Human Evolution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Human Evolution Human Evolution By: William Henderer Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………..…page 3 Chapter One: Body Changes…………………………………………………page 4 Chapter Two: Tools…………………………………………………………...page 8 Chapter Three: Culture………………………………………………………page 11 Chapter Four: Migration…………………………………………………….page 16 Chapter Five: Anthropology………………………………………………...page 20 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………..page 23 Works Cited…………………………………………………………………page 24 Images Cited………………………………………………………………...page 25 2 Introduction I chose this topic because I have always been interested in why humans are so much more advanced than other species. I have definitely enjoyed doing the research and writing the paper. It was difficult at times, but I pulled through and got it done. The biggest questions I had were, “Why do we need to evolve?”, “How did we become so advanced?” and “How similar are we compared to each other?”. It took a lot of research to answer these questions, but I eventually found the answers. While researching I came across a theme to human evolution. Not many people realize this, but human evolution makes humanity what it is currently. When we look deeper into our origins, human evolution can vastly broaden our perspective. We can look at things around us and realize how long it took humans to develop things. It makes us think more about what seem to be simple things and piques our curiosity about what it means to be human. 3 Chapter One Body Changes Human fossil records have helped us understand early humans. The first beings that closely resembled modern humans were living approximately one million years ago. The first hominids*, also known as human ancestors, lived in Africa about eight to six million years ago. Current fossil records go back only seven million years. The fossil records show immense amounts of information about the brain. The percent of body space that the brain takes up has grown from 1.2% to 2.75%. Chimpanzees have a low, small brain case. However, some early humans had long and large brain cases. Neanderthals, one of the more recent hominids, had large skulls and brains that were even bigger than modern humans. Just because neanderthals had a bigger brain, this did not mean they were more intelligent. *any member of the group consisting of all modern and extinct humans and great apes (including gorillas, chimpanzees, and orangutans) and all their immediate ancestors. Brain size between species varied quite a bit. Larger brains can overheat easily which may have caused hair loss. Interestingly enough, homo 4 heidelbergensis, who lived around 250,000 to 1,000,000 years ago, had a similar size brain to a modern human. In the past three million years, human brain size has nearly tripled. This could be the result of eating more protein on a regular basis. Brain size has dramatically changed human intelligence. Some hominids* developed adaptations to the environment in which they lived. Neanderthal heads were lower, longer, and had round eye sockets with heavy brows, and large teeth. Paranthropus robustus, who lived two to one million years ago, had a ridge on the top of its skull, strong muscles for chewing, and large grinding teeth. Australopithecus afarensis, who lived three to two million years ago, had small canine teeth, thick cheek teeth and thicker bones. Homo erectus, who lived 2,500,000 to 250,000 years ago, had strong chewing muscles, a dome shaped head, and flat wide face. All of these species fared well with these adaptations to the environment. *any member of the group consisting of all modern and extinct humans and all ​ their immediate ancestors, specifically species more closely related to modern humans than to chimpanzees. Humans' skulls have changed dramatically from those of apes. Chins receded at ausrulopithuceus afarensis. Modern humans have a bone that keeps the tongue in one place letting humans make all kinds of sounds. The modern human skull is higher, more rounded with a flat face, and teeth and jaws are much smaller than apes. 5 The rest of the body changed immensely as well. Neanderthals had humongous bones, inflated chests, and were quite strong. Chimpanzees have longer arms than legs, unlike modern humans who have longer legs than arms. Australopithecus afarensis had big and strong arms. Like modern humans Australopithecus afarensis had an s shaped back, broad knees, and forward facing toes. These are only a few changes. Hominins' bodies started to look somewhat similar to modern humans 1.8 million years ago. Modern humans were the only living hominin species 30,000 years ago. Australopithecus garhi, who lived around 2.5 million had long legs which gave us the legs we have today. Our legs helped us survive, they helped us run from predators and go places faster. Evolution is supposed to help us reproduce, and that is how longer legs helped. They stayed with our ancestors, who passed them down to us. Arm and leg length has grown quite a bit relatively recently. Humans still have not changed that much in the past 100,000 years. It is harder for modern humans to reproduce because humans’ big heads put quite a bit of strain on our smaller pelvises. Neanderthals were probably able to survive the ice age because their small limbs lost heat slowly. Humans’ bodies have had some major changes in structure over the years. 6 Chapter Two Tools As humans became more complex their tools became increasingly more complex with them. Tools looked very different, depending on where and when they were made. Most tools did one of the following: grind, chop, or cut. In different regions, tools would look different because the culture that used the tools may have used them in different ways. Gorillas do not use tools as much as chimpanzees, but they still will crack a nut with a rock. Chimpanzees on the other hand, will actually take a leaf and use it to get water out of a tree, they also will use leaves to shelter from the rain. Neanderthals hunted with spears and axes. There were various kinds of tools for many circumstances. Many species used different tools for hunting. Neanderthals mostly ate meat which they had to hunt for, also, they would eat fish and plants. Homo habilis cut open nuts and shells with rocks. They also used tools to crush bones for the fatty bone marrow inside. Tools were not only used for hunting. Sometimes humans would be buried with special tools. Many tools could help reach things. After the Ice Age, people started to farm and made tools to do so. Flint sickles were used to harvest crops. Small shovels were made to dig holes in the ground. People also made places to put crops to save for the winter. Tools were complex and hard to make. By taking a stone and hitting it against another stone you could chip off bits of rock and make a tool. Different types of rocks were better for other tools. A stone could be fastened to a shaft to make a thrusting spear. It can take a long time to make one tool. 7 There are four main steps in making a stone tool. The first step is burying the rocks and building a fire on top of them. The next step is to chip off flakes of stone. After that the rocks would be pushed down upon so the rocks shape into what tool the maker wants it to be. Finally use bones to make fine sharp tips. The type of rock used is important. Early stone tools were just rock grabbed off the ground. Tools were made from many different types of rocks, some better than others. Sometimes people would travel ten miles to find good rocks like obsidian. It can be hard to tell the difference between normal rocks and tools, however if the rock is not native to the area then it is probably a tool. Sometimes scientists put together pieces of chipped rock back together to make the original stone. Some rocks were valued deeply and for some strange reason, the largest tools were found in China, nobody knows why. 8 Chapter Three Art There were two different periods throughout prehistoric art. The early period, which is associated with hand stencil spray painting ( with pigment not paint) and drawings of large animals. The later period consisted mostly of migrating humans on a stylistic background. The early period is dated about 39,000 years old. While the late period is dated to 10,000 years ago. In different time periods there were different art styles, this is still true today. Paint was essential for drawing all kinds of animals and people. People would work extremely hard to get paint. Haematite, limonite, and specularite can produce a wide variety of colors for paint. People would crush the minerals to get colored powder which they would use to paint. Some paint was specifically used as body paint. Some Scientists believe that color coding might have been a method of communication. Many people painted cave art in Europe. Over 90 different caves containing paintings have been found, but more are to be discovered. In caves people used red, yellow, brown, and black paint. Most of this cave painting happened 40,000 years ago. Cave painting is probably the most well known ancient painting that people did. 9 Art can show scientists what was around in the past. During December of 1994, three explorers came together to explore caves near Avignon, France. They found over 300 cave paintings of animals that were over 32,000 years old. Art like this can tell researchers about the animals that lived long ago without needing to find the bones. Using carbon dating they can find out when the painting was made thus telling them when the animals lived.
Recommended publications
  • Art and Symbolism: the Case Of
    ON THE EMERGENCE OF ART AND SYMBOLISM: THE CASE OF NEANDERTAL ‘ART’ IN NORTHERN SPAIN by Amy Chase B.A. University of Victoria, 2011 A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Archaeology Memorial University of Newfoundland May 2017 St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador ABSTRACT The idea that Neandertals possessed symbolic and artistic capabilities is highly controversial, as until recently, art creation was thought to have been exclusive to Anatomically Modern Humans. An intense academic debate surrounding Neandertal behavioural and cognitive capacities is fuelled by methodological advancements, archaeological reappraisals, and theoretical shifts. Recent re-dating of prehistoric rock art in Spain, to a time when Neandertals could have been the creators, has further fuelled this debate. This thesis aims to address the underlying causes responsible for this debate and investigate the archaeological signifiers of art and symbolism. I then examine the archaeological record of El Castillo, which contains some of the oldest known cave paintings in Europe, with the objective of establishing possible evidence for symbolic and artistic behaviour in Neandertals. The case of El Castillo is an illustrative example of some of the ideas and concepts that are currently involved in the interpretation of Neandertals’ archaeological record. As the dating of the site layer at El Castillo is problematic, and not all materials were analyzed during this study, the results of this research are rather inconclusive, although some evidence of probable symbolic behaviour in Neandertals at El Castillo is identified and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Aestheticus’
    Conceptual Paper Glob J Arch & Anthropol Volume 11 Issue 3 - June 2020 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Shuchi Srivastava DOI: 10.19080/GJAA.2020.11.555815 Man and Artistic Expression: Emergence of ‘Homo Aestheticus’ Shuchi Srivastava* Department of Anthropology, National Post Graduate College, University of Lucknow, India Submission: May 30, 2020; Published: June 16, 2020 *Corresponding author: Shuchi Srivastava, Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, National Post Graduate College, An Autonomous College of University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India Abstract Man is a member of animal kingdom like all other animals but his unique feature is culture. Cultural activities involve art and artistic expressions which are the earliest methods of emotional manifestation through sign. The present paper deals with the origin of the artistic expression of the man, i.e. the emergence of ‘Homo aestheticus’ and discussed various related aspects. It is basically a conceptual paper; history of art begins with humanity. In his artistic instincts and attainments, man expressed his vigour, his ability to establish a gainful and optimistictherefore, mainlyrelationship the secondary with his environmentsources of data to humanizehave been nature. used for Their the behaviorsstudy. Overall as artists findings was reveal one of that the man selection is artistic characteristics by nature suitableand the for the progress of the human species. Evidence from extensive analysis of cave art and home art suggests that humans have also been ‘Homo aestheticus’ since their origins. Keywords: Man; Art; Artistic expression; Homo aestheticus; Prehistoric art; Palaeolithic art; Cave art; Home art Introduction ‘Sahityasangeetkalavihinah, Sakshatpashuh Maybe it was the time when some African apelike creatures to 7 million years ago, the first human ancestors were appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • Early and Middle Pleistocene Faunal and Hominins Dispersals Through Southwestern Asia
    Early and Middle Pleistocene Faunal and Hominins Dispersals through Southwestern Asia The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bar-Yosef, Ofer and Miriam Belmaker. Forthcoming. Early and Middle Pleistocene faunal and hominins dispersals through Southwestern Asia. Quaternary Science Reviews 29. Published Version doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.02.016 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4270472 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP 1 Early and Middle Pleistocene Faunal and Hominins Dispersals through 2 Southwestern Asia 3 4 5 Ofer Bar-Yosef and Miriam Belmaker 6 Department of Anthropology 7 Harvard University 8 11 Divinity Avenue 9 Cambridge MA 02138 10 Phone ++ 1 617 495 1279 11 Fax ++ 1 617 496 8041 12 1 12 Abstract 13 This review summarizes the paleoecology of the Early and Middle Pleistocene of 14 southwestern Asia, based on both flora and fauna, retrieved from a series of ‘windows’ 15 provided by the excavated sites. The incomplete chrono-stratigraphy of this vast region 16 does not allow to accept the direct chronological correlation between the available sites 17 and events of faunal and hominin dispersals from Africa. It also demonstrates that 18 hominins survived in a mixed landscape of open parkland with forested surrounding hills. 19 In addition, the prevailing environmental conditions are not sufficient to explain the 20 differences between ‘core and flake’ and the Acheulian industries that probably reflect 21 the learned traditions of different groups of hominins successful adaptations to new 22 ecological niches away from the African savanna.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Painting: Demons and Depictions
    EPAPER LIVE TV DAWNNEWS URDU IMAGES HERALD AURORA CITYFM89 TEELI ADVERTISE EVENTS / SUPPLEMENTS CLASSIFIEDS OBITUARIES TODAY'S PAPER | MAY 03, 2021 Cave painting: Demons and depictions Zulfiqar Ali Kalhoro | Published August 16, 2015 Painting in Lahuat Rock Shelter From time to time rock paintings have been discovered in different regions of Pakistan such as the Musa Khel region of Loralai District in Balochistan, the Buner, Swat and Mansehra Districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhawa and Khaplu and Astor in Gilgit-Baltisan. The earliest specimen of rock paintings is located at Malvi in the Musa Khel Tehsil of Lora Lai District, Balochistan. There are nine rock shelters at this site which depict pre- historic and pre-Buddhist paintings. But what may be surprising is that both petroglyphs and pictographs have been found in the Gadap Tehsil of Karachi while rock carvings have been found at Lahaut (Nain Mol), Rahim Bakhsh Gabol and Maher in Gadap Tehsil. The rock carvings at Rahim Bakhsh Village are engraved on bedrock and include carvings of geometric designs, shoe prints and arrows. Apart from the petroglyphs at the Rahim Bakhsh rock-art site, one also finds both petroglyphs and pictograms in the Maher Valley. Petroglyphs are found at Baithi Lak (pass) near the Lahaut rock shelter. This is the main Lak through which people enter into the valley of Maher. There are many petroglyphs on the sandstone rock wall with the majority of these engravings being geometric designs. Painting of the so-called Maher Deity Rock paintings are located in a rock shelter at Lahaut in Maher Valley, situated about 60 km north of Karachi.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paleo-Anthropocene and the Genesis of the Current Landscape of Israel
    aaaJournal of Landscape Ecology (2017), Vol: 10 / No. 3 THE PALEO-ANTHROPOCENE AND THE GENESIS OF THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE OF ISRAEL OREN ACKERMANN1*, AREN M. MAEIR2, SUEMBIKYA (SUE) FRUMIN2, TAL SVORAY3, EHUD WEISS2, HELENA M. ZHEVELEV4, LIORA KOLSKA HORWITZ5 1Israel Heritage Department and the Department of Land of Israel Studies and Archaeology, Ariel University, Israel, P.O.B. 3, Ariel 4070000 2The Martin (Szusz) Department of Land of Israel Studies and Archaeology, Bar-Ilan University, Israel 3Department of Geography and Environmental Development, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O.B. 653, Beer-Sheva, 84105 Israel 4The Laboratory of Geomorphology and Soil, The Department of Geography and Environment, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 52900 Israel. [email protected] 5National Natural History Collections, Faculty of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel *The first draft of this paper was written when O.A. was a staff member at Ashkelon Academic College and at Bar-Ilan University, corresponding author: [email protected] Received: 12th August 2017, Accepted: 30th November 2017 ABSTRACT Worldwide, human impact on natural landscapes has intensified since prehistoric times, and this is well documented in the global archaeological record. The period between the earliest hominids and the Industrial Revolution of the late 18-19th centuries is known as the Paleo-Anthropocene. The current study reviews key geoarchaeological, floral and faunal factors of the Paleo-Anthropocene in Israel, an area that has undergone human activities in various intensities since prehistoric times. It discusses significant human imprints on these three features in the Israeli landscape, demonstrating that its current form is almost entirely anthropogenic.
    [Show full text]
  • Biface Distributions and the Movius Line: a Southeast Asian Perspective
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2012 Biface distributions and the Movius Line: A Southeast Asian perspective Adam Brumm University of Wollongong, [email protected] Mark W. Moore University of New England Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers Part of the Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brumm, Adam and Moore, Mark W.: Biface distributions and the Movius Line: A Southeast Asian perspective 2012, 32-46. https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers/4441 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Biface distributions and the Movius Line: A Southeast Asian perspective Abstract The ‘Movius Line’ is the putative technological demarcation line mapping the easternmost geographical distribution of Acheulean bifacial tools. It is traditionally argued by proponents of the Movius Line that ‘true’ Acheulean bifaces, especially handaxes, are only found in abundance in Africa and western Eurasia, whereas in eastern Asia, in front of the ‘line’, these implements are rare or absent altogether. Here we argue, however, that the Movius Line relies on classifying undated surface bifaces as Acheulean on typological grounds alone, a long-standing and widely accepted practice in Africa and western Eurasia, but one that is not seen as legitimate in eastern Asian contexts. A review of the literature shows that bifaces are relatively common as surface finds in Southeast Asia and on this basis we argue that the Movius Line is in need of reassessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Paintings Cave Paintings Created by Primitive People Are Found on Every ▼ Cave Paintings at Continent
    Cave Paintings Cave paintings created by primitive people are found on every ▼ Cave Paintings at continent. The oldest ones were made about 35,000 years ago. Tassili n’Ajer, Algeria Cave paintings in Europe and Africa often show images of These paintings depict women, children, and hunting and daily activities. In the Americas and Australia, on cattle. Located in Algeria, the Tassili n’Ajer the other hand, the paintings tend to be more symbolic and (tah•SEEL•ee nah• ZHEER) site contains more than less realistic. 15,000 images. They depict shifts in climate, Scholars are not sure about the purpose of cave paintings. animal migrations, and changes in human life. They may have been part of magical rites, hunting rituals, or The oldest paintings date back to about 6000 B.C. Images continued to be painted until an attempt to mark the events during various seasons. Another around the second century A.D. theory is that cave paintings (especially the more realistic ones) may simply be depictions of the surrounding world. RESEARCH LINKS For more on cave paintings, go to classzone.com ▼ Cave Paintings at Cuevas de las Manos in Argentina Cuevas de las Manos (Cave of the Hands) is located in the Rio Pinturas ravine, northeast of Santa Cruz, Argentina. Its rock walls display numerous hand paintings in vivid colors. The Tehuelches (tuh•WEHL•cheez) people created the paintings between 13,000 and 9,500 years ago. The cave is about 78 feet deep and, at the entrance, about 48 feet wide and 32 feet high. 12 ▲ Replica of Lascaux Cave Painting, France Discovered in 1940 , the Lascaux (lah•SKOH) cave contains more than 600 painted animals and symbols.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Painting UNIT 1
    All Grades ART ~ Lesson A CYCLE 1 Cave Painting UNIT 1 !! Students will create a cave painting using charcoal and acrylic. Printing"the"Handout" guarantees"families"see" Before the Lesson: the"“home"follow@up" assignment”"and"have" 1.! Review Lesson and Art Handout (below) to understand philosophy and ideas. terms"and"visual"aids" 2.! Print “Animal Template” (below) on card-stock and cut out for"studying"during"the" 3.! Print “Handout” (below) week.""" 4.! Review materials list below and make sure you have everything ready. 5.! Review In-Class section below to make sure you understand the activity. 6.! Optional: Print “ Visual Aids” (below, images are the same as Handout) Materials Needed: !! 1-2 Colors of Acrylic Paint !! 1 Paintbrush per student !! 1 Water Jar per student !! Animal templates (see below, print enough so that each student can have at least one animal at a time). !! 1 11x17 sheet of sketch paper per student !! 1 Willow Stick or piece of charcoal per student Check$with$your$local$ !! 1 Handout on paper, in color per student (or per family) co7op$director"to" !! 1 Large fan know"what"supplies"are" !! Roll of paper towels already"on@hand"and" which"ones"you"need"to" !! Bottle of cleaning spray procure"by"buying"or" !! 1 Smock per student borrowing."""" !! 1 set of Visual Aids on paper, in color (see below, images are same as Handout Feel$free$to$substitute$ materials"when" Classroom Preparation (always plan at least 30 minutes): desired/needed.""" •! Cover the floor with plastic. •! Set up tables throughout the room, covered with plastic.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Age Technology
    World’s Early People DIGGING UP DNA STONE AGE TECHNOLOGY IN PARTNERSHIP WITH Worlds_Early_People_FC.indd 1 2/7/17 11:22 AM 2 Who Lived in the Stone Age? When you think of “old,” what comes to But they helped hominins to thrive. mind? Last year’s shoes? Life before the The first species to make tools is from the Internet? Try a little earlier – 2.5 million genus (category) we call Homo (human). It years earlier! is known as Homo habilis, or “handy That’s about the time some of the first person.” It most likely lived in Africa 1.5 hominins, or humanlike species that walk to 2.4 million years ago. Homo habilis upright, started making tools from rocks. represented a big change. How big? Big Their tools were simple – mainly stones enough that we call its time the Paleolithic split to form a point or a sharp edge. era, or the Old Stone Age. l THE BRAINS ability to make of Homo habilis and use tools. were about Homo habilis’s half the size of tools and brain- present-day human power helped it brains. However, spread. Over the brains of Homo millennia, it habilis were larger adapted, or made than the brains changes that of the hominins helped it survive, to that came before live in regions that it. This may have earlier species had contributed to its found too harsh. d HOMO ERECTUS, or early as 2.5 million communities, hunt “upright person,” years ago, Homo for food, create art, was probably a lot erectus was at its and control fire like Homo habilis, peak about 1.9 for warmth and but taller and thin- million years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of Our Reality and Myths
    Psychology and Behavioral Science International Journal ISSN 2474-7688 Opinion Psychol Behav Sci Int J Volume 15 Issue 2 - August 2020 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Prof. Dr. Peter Jörg Plath DOI: 10.19080/PBSIJ.2020.15.555909 Construction of our Reality and Myths Peter Jörg Plath* and Ernst-Christoph Haß University of Bremen, Germany Submission: June 22, 2020; Published: August 11, 2020 *Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. Peter Jörg Plath, University of Bremen (retired), Vogelgesangstraße 26, D - 1727 9 Lychen, Germany Abstract We are currently thinking about how to describe the structure of the global corona crisis. In terms of synergy, this crisis is obviously an instability in the social system that has led to the spread of the virus and the related shutdown of the most important economies in the world and of these drastic changes, in the economy, in our lives, in the way we move in public spaces and in human relationships. But all of this is connected withall public the emergencelife. This development and expansion is associated of new communication with great efforts, options especially as well by as the new industrialized stories, narratives countries, and to fakes. reduce It the is the economic hour of consequences birth of new myths! In this context, it seems appropriate to us to take excerpts from our work on the origins of the myths of the technical revolution and to make them accessible to a wider public. In the following we will refer to our lecture “Structure Formation by Social Reflection – Myths and Reality” which we gave at the Frolov conference in Moscow at the Institute for Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Painting
    Cave Painting Cave paintings from Lascaux caves (Montignac, Dordogne, France) Some of the earliest examples of art include cave paintings found all over the world. Going as far back in time as tens of thousands of years, the paintings often show animals and humans in connection with the natural environment. These images give us a glimpse of the mind of the maker, communicating natural and possibly spiritual messages through symbolic drawings. Making art is a very human cultural experience, and our expression of art has been a constant practice right from the start. Neolithic cave paintings found in Tassil-n-Ajjer (Plateau of the Chasms) region of the Sahara Be inspired by cave paintings and make your own cave art! See below for examples of cave art from the Maxwell Museum Ancestors exhibit and click here for a video tutorial for making your own cave painting. Cave painting reproductions, Maxwell Museum – Salon Noir, Niaux, France Draw your own forms or use these traditional forms for inspiration. Resources: Cave painting online exhibit – Google Arts and Culture https://artsandculture.google.com/project/chauvet-cave Cave painting lesson plan from the National Endowment for the Humanities https://edsitement.neh.gov/lesson-plans/cave-art-discovering-prehistoric-humans-through-pictures UNESCO page on cave art around the world https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/?search=cave+art&order=country Lascaux guided tour – French Ministry of Culture https://archeologie.culture.fr/lascaux/fr#/en/00.xml/index.html Cave Art 101 – National Geographic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjejoT1gFOc Lascaux Cave Paintings – Project #113 – United Art and Education https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1HC3UeBAng Lessons on Lascaux – Dick Blick https://www.dickblick.com/lesson-plans/lessons-on-lascaux/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0yH0Ia3NDE Lulu inspired by cave art .
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Kingdom of Punt and Its Factor in Egyptian History Abstract
    The Ancient Kingdom of Punt and its Factor in Egyptian History By Said M-Shidad Hussein April 21, 2014 Part 1 ____________________________________________________________________________ Abstract: The purpose of this study is to shed more light on the location of ancient land of Punt and the nature of its relationship with ancient Egypt through discussion on the following points: origin of Somali history (introduction); review of the opposite arguments on the location of Punt; Punt as a kingdom; the scope of its trade; the evidences in the exported Plants and Animals; Greco- Roman account for the location of Punt; linguistic evidences; ethnographic significance of Puntite names; genetic evidence; archaeological and cultural connections; continuation of commercial aspect; Conclusion. Note: In this document, as in many of other records, the names Somali, Somaliland, Somali Peninsula, and the Eastern Horn of Africa are substitutable; the terms ‘North East Africa’ and ‘Horn of Africa’ (from Sudan to the north and the east of Kenya) also do mean a same thing, although if it’s said ‘the Horn’ only, it usually refers to the Somali Peninsula, not the greater Horn of Africa; but still the term ‘Horn of Africa’ is used elastically depending on the context. On the same token, the terms Southwest Asia, Near East, and Middle East are interchangeable. I.Introduction: Origins of Somali History Origin: Notwithstanding some previously-presented hypotheses on origin of the Somalis, Somalia is a six millennia-old nation that has been occupying the Somali Peninsula throughout the time of its history. Even the last and most accepted one of these hypotheses which originates the Somali from Omo-Tana region cannot be valid anymore, and it is not logical even, because of various, ignored accounts.
    [Show full text]