DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Entry Into WWI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Entry Into WWI U.S. Entry Into WWI So we know that the fighting of WWI started in Europe. In what year??? Who was president? The U.S. at this point declared their neutrality toward the war. They were still focused on what concept??? What was it called? America stayed out of the war for as long as they could but their hand was forced by what country? U.S. Entry Into WWI Crash Course- Who started WWI? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pFCpKtwCkI U.S. Entry Into WWI Unrestricted submarine warfare- So Great Britain set up a naval blockade (What does this word mean?) of Germany. Germany retaliates by stating they will sink ANY naval vessel without warning. Sinking of the Lusitania- May 7, 1915, the Germans sunk the British ship, Lusitania. 1,200 people were killed including 128 Americans. This outraged many Americans and some argue this helped bring the U.S. into WWI. So, in war there is an understanding that you do not target civilians. Germany broke this rule. U.S. Entry Into WWI The Sussex Pledge- The Sussex Pledge promised a change in Germany’s naval warfare policy. Sussex Pledge promised that: Passenger ships would not be targeted Merchant ships would not be sunk until the presence of weapons had been established, nor without provision for the safety of passengers and crew. The Germans made this promise to the then neutral U.S. on May 4th, 1916. On February 1st, 1917, they went back on their promise and resumed unrestricted submarine warfare. U.S. Entry Into WWI Zimmerman Telegraph- a top secret, coded message sent by German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmerman to his country’s diplomatic delegation in Mexico in January 1917. The communication was an attempt to draw Mexico into warfare should the United States join the Allies in Europe. The interception and de-coding of the Zimmermann Telegram revealed a promise to the Mexican Government that Germany would help Mexico recover the territory it had ceded to the USA (Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona) following the Mexican-American War. The Zimmerman telegram sparked nationwide outrage during WWI and helped to bring about American participation in the Great War. U.S. Entry Into WWI Finally, in April 1917, the U.S. declared war on Germany. Stayed out for how long? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmyc_p20o_c U.S. Entry Into WWI Trench Warfare- a form of warfare in which opposing armies fight each other from trenches dug in the battlefield. Fighting with trenches, mines, and barbed wire. Horrible living conditions, great slaughter, little to no gains, stalemate, used in WWI. http://www.history.com/topics/world-war- i/world-war-i-history/videos/bet-you-didnt-know- trench-warfare New weapons (airplanes, automatic weapons, poison gas, tanks)- humans proved to be remarkably ingenuous and adaptable when it came to finding new ways to maim and kill during WWI. U.S. Entry Into WWI New Weapons continued- The major impact of technology on World War I (WWI) was that it made the war much more difficult for the infantry soldiers who did most of the fighting. The new technologies led to trench warfare and the lack of new tactics led to massive slaughter at the hands of the new technology. U.S. Entry into WWI New technology in the form of machine guns and rapid-fire artillery gave a huge advantage to any army fighting on the defensive in this war. When the war settled down into stalemate on the Western Front, each side had really good defensive positions with their machine guns and their artillery. Even so, both sides felt the need to launch offensives at times. This meant that they were going to hurl infantrymen at the entrenched enemy with their technological advantages. This led to massive slaughter. U.S. Entry into WWI With the war bogged down, another new technology made war even more miserable. This was poison gas. Both sides felt that the use of poison gas would allow them to break through the enemy defenses, but no such thing happened. http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-i/world- war-i-history/videos/tech-developments-of-world- war-i http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-i/world- war-i-history U.S. Entry into WWI Woodrow Wilson was elected again in 1916. He ran on the slogan “He Kept Us Out of War.” Remember, we didn’t enter the war until?????? Public opinion on WWI was divided in the U.S. Some Americans, notably socialists, Christian pacifists, anarchists, women’s groups, unionists, and intellectuals opposed the war. Some believed the government was entering the war not to “make the world safe for democracy,” as Wilson claimed, but rather to serve the interest of capitalists. Other Americans strongly supported the U.S. entry into the war in light of the Zimmerman telegram and the sinking of the Lusitania. U.S. Entry into WWI Committee on Public Information- a propaganda agency that tried to drum up support for U.S. entry into WWI. It depicted Germans and other enemies on bad terms, and served to censor the press. U.S. Entry into WWI Espionage Act of 1917- made it a crime for a person to mail or print information that inspired dissent against the American war effort or promoted it’s enemies. Sedition Act of 1918- any treacherous act or draft dodging was forbidden, outlawed disgracing the government, the Constitution, or military uniforms, and forbade aiding the enemy. U.S. Entry into WWI What is the 1st Amendment? Schenck v. United States- Congress could restrict speech if the words “are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger.” Schenck was convicted for mailing pamphlets urging potential army inductees to resist conscription. U.S. Entry into WWI Well, what can we do to support our country through a time of war? Any ideas? Thoughts? U.S. Entry into WWI Victory gardens- private gardens which American citizens were encouraged to create as a source of food during the war period. Liberty bonds- government bonds sold to gain money for WWI. U.S. Entry into WWI Selective service act- law provided for the registration of all American men between the ages of 21 and 30 for a military draft. War Industries Board- agency established during WWI to increase efficiency & discourage waste in war-related industries. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The United States Home Front During World War I
    The United States Home Front During World War I War bonds Elaborate propaganda campaigns were launched to encourage Americans to (1914-1918, page 1 of 2) buy Liberty Bonds. Zimmerman Telegram The home front of the United States in World War I saw a systematic A 1917 diplomatic proposal from Germany encouraging Mexico to declare war on mobilization of the entire population and the entire economy to produce the the US. soldiers, food supplies, munitions, and money needed to win the war. Germany anticipated their resumption of unrestricted submarine warfare Although the United States entered the war in 1917, there had been very early in 1917 would bring the neural US into the war, so the goal was to little planning, or even recognition of the problems that the British and have Mexico preoccupy the US on their continent. other Allies had to solve on their home fronts. Germany promised money and a military alliance with Mexico, and As a result, the level of confusion was high in the first 12 months, promised them a return of the territories of Texas, New Mexico and then efficiency took control. Arizona (which were lost from Mexico between 1836-1848). Germany had been attempting to get Mexico to attack the US Key Dates: since 1914, hoping that in doing so it would cease the Lend Lease 28 July 1914 World War I begins activities. 7 May 1915 The Lusitania is sunk The proposal was intercepted and decoded by British intelligence, January 1917 The Zimmerman Telegram reveled and the revelations of the contents outraged American public February 1917 Russian Revolution begins (leaves WWI in October) opinion and helped generate support for the US declaration of April 1917 US enters World War I war on Germany in April 1917 11 November 1918 World War I ends After contemplation, Mexico rejects the proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2Nd December 1917
    Centre for First World War Studies A Moonlight Massacre: The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2nd December 1917 by Michael Stephen LoCicero Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts & Law June 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The Third Battle of Ypres was officially terminated by Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig with the opening of the Battle of Cambrai on 20 November 1917. Nevertheless, a comparatively unknown set-piece attack – the only large-scale night operation carried out on the Flanders front during the campaign – was launched twelve days later on 2 December. This thesis, a necessary corrective to published campaign narratives of what has become popularly known as „Passchendaele‟, examines the course of events from the mid-November decision to sanction further offensive activity in the vicinity of Passchendaele village to the barren operational outcome that forced British GHQ to halt the attack within ten hours of Zero. A litany of unfortunate decisions and circumstances contributed to the profitless result.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, 22 January, 1917. 823
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 22 JANUARY, 1917. 823 W. Bid. E. Garrison Battalions. ° Temp. 2nd Lt. G. P. Bennett to be Adjt. Dorset. E. and temp. Lt. whilst so empld., vice Capt. S. Temp. Capt. F. S. Reynolds, from 1st Danby. 20 Sept. 1916. Garr. Bn. Hamps. R., to be temp. Capt. 12 Temp. 2nd Lt. E. Parker to .be temp. Lt. Jan. 1917, but with seniority from 20 Mar. 28 Dec. 1916. 1915. Bord. E. Temp. Lt. S. J. Price (2nd Lt., Wore. R.) High. L.I. to be actg. Capt. whilst comdg. a Co. 27 Cadet John. Macgavin Maclean to be Oct. 1916. temp. 2nd Lt. 19 Dec.'1916. Temp. 2nd Lt. A. E. Greenhill to be Labour Battalions. actg. Capt. whilst comdg. a Co. 3 Dec. E. Fus. 1916. Temp. 2nd Lt. C. E. S. Newman, from E. Suss. E. R.E., to be temp. 2nd Lt. 16 Dec. 1916, Temp. Capt. W. T. Heagerty to be temp but with seniority from 2 July 1916. Maj. 1 Aug. 1916. Works Battalions. N. Lan. E. The undermentioned temp. 2nd Lts. to be Midd'x E. temp. 2nd Lta>.: — Charles Wright to be temp. 2nd Lt. 8 T. D. Penrice, from North'd Fus. 25 Jan. 1917. • Sept. 1915, but with seniority from 18 Nov. 1914. Durh. L.I. L. A. Soman, from Norf. R. (attd.) 9 May Capt. F. L. Overend (S. Staff. R. (T.F.)) 1916, but with seniority from 1 Mar. 1915. is apptd. to a Bn. 9 Dec. 1916, but with seniority from 19 Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 26 January, 1917
    966 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 26 JANUARY, 1917. Devonshire Regt.—The undermentioned 2nd Dorsetshire Regt.—Capt. (Hon. Maj.) C. C. Lts. (temp. Lts.) relinquish the temp, rank Hughes-D'Aeth to be acting Maj. 22nd of Lt. on alteration in posting: — Aug. 1916. 2nd Lt. (temp. Lt.) G. L. Kingwell, with precedence as from 10th Dec. 1914. 25th South Lancashire Regt.—Capt. (temp. Maj.) Oct. 1916. R. P. Nash to be Maj. 8th Oct. 1916. 2nd Lt. (temp. Lt.) W. H. Eadcliffe, with Royal Highlanders.—Lt. I. MacK. Law to be precedence, as from 20th Sept. 1914. 4th Capt., with precedence as from 18th Nov. Nov. 1916. 1916. 27th Jan. 1917. The undermentioned 2nd Lts. (acting Lt. (temp! Capt.) H. R. C. Arbuthnott to Capts.) relinquish the acting rank of Capt. be Capt., and remain seconded. 14th Nov. on alteration in posting: — 1916. J. B. Partington, with precedence as from Lt. (temp. Capt.) A. H. M. Wedderburn 9th Oct. 1914. 26th Oct. 1916. to be Capt., with precedence as from 14th R. H. Kennaway, with precedence as from Nov. 1916, and remain seconded. 27th Jan. 20th Sept. 1914. 4th Nov. 1916. 1917. Lt. (temp. Capt.) A. W. Duke to be Capt., Lancashire Fus.—2nd Lt. A. D. Perry to be and remain seconded. 14th Nov. 1916. acting Capt. whilst comdg. a Co. 25th Nov. Lt. (temp. Capt.) R. P. D. Bruce to be 1916. Capt. 14th Nov. 1916. Cheshire Regt.—Capt. (temp. Maj.) F. C. 2nd Lt. J. D. O. Ooates to be Lt., with Gregory to be Maj., with precedence as from precedence as from 14th Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Source and Background Documents D
    Note: Original spelling is retained for this document and all that follow. Appendix 1: Primary source and background documents Document No. 1: Germany's Declaration of War with Russia, August 1, 1914 Presented by the German Ambassador to St. Petersburg The Imperial German Government have used every effort since the beginning of the crisis to bring about a peaceful settlement. In compliance with a wish expressed to him by His Majesty the Emperor of Russia, the German Emperor had undertaken, in concert with Great Britain, the part of mediator between the Cabinets of Vienna and St. Petersburg; but Russia, without waiting for any result, proceeded to a general mobilisation of her forces both on land and sea. In consequence of this threatening step, which was not justified by any military proceedings on the part of Germany, the German Empire was faced by a grave and imminent danger. If the German Government had failed to guard against this peril, they would have compromised the safety and the very existence of Germany. The German Government were, therefore, obliged to make representations to the Government of His Majesty the Emperor of All the Russias and to insist upon a cessation of the aforesaid military acts. Russia having refused to comply with this demand, and having shown by this refusal that her action was directed against Germany, I have the honour, on the instructions of my Government, to inform your Excellency as follows: His Majesty the Emperor, my august Sovereign, in the name of the German Empire, accepts the challenge, and considers himself at war with Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Times Supplements, 1910-1917
    The Times Supplements, 1910-1917 Peter O’Connor Musashino University, Tokyo Peter Robinson Japan Women’s University, Tokyo 1 Overview of the collection Geographical Supplements – The Times South America Supplements, (44 [43]1 issues, 752 pages) – The Times Russian Supplements, (28 [27] issues, 576 pages) – The Japanese Supplements, (6 issues, 176 pages) – The Spanish Supplement , (36 pages, single issue) – The Norwegian Supplement , (24 pages, single issue) Supplements Associated with World War I – The French Yellow Book (19 Dec 1914, 32 pages) – The Red Cross Supplement (21 Oct 1915, 32 pages) – The Recruiting Supplement (3 Nov 1915, 16 pages) – War Poems from The Times, August 1914-1915 (9 August 1915, 16 pages) Special Supplements – The Divorce Commission Supplement (13 Nov 1912, 8 pages) – The Marconi Scandal Supplement (14 Jun 1913, 8 pages) 2 Background The Times Supplements published in this series comprise eighty-five largely geographically-based supplements, complemented by significant groups and single-issue supplements on domestic and international political topics, of which 83 are published here. Alfred Harmsworth, Lord Northcliffe (1865-1922), acquired The Times newspaper in 1908. In adding the most influential and reliable voice of the British establishment and of Imperially- fostered globalisation to his growing portfolio of newspapers and magazines, Northcliffe aroused some opposition among those who feared that he would rely on his seemingly infallible ear for the popular note and lower the tone and weaken the authority of The Times. Northcliffe had long hoped to prise this trophy from the control of the Walters family, convinced of his ability to make more of the paper than they had, and from the beginning applied his singular energy and intuition to improving the fortunes of ‘The Thunderer’.
    [Show full text]
  • How Did German Policy from January 1917 Onward Cause
    HOW DID GERMAN POLICY FROM JANUARY 1917 ONWARD CAUSE THE UNITED STATES TO DECLARE WAR? Zimmerman Papers were famous because they exposed a German plot to enlist Mexico into an alliance with Germany in a war against the U.S. Prior to U.S. entry into WWI, Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare most challenged the nations' neutrality - Freedom of navigation on the seas was central to President Wilson's foreign policy from 1914 to 1917 - Germany's declaration of its intent to wage unrestricted submarine warfare had the greatest effect in moving the U.S. toward WWI Evidence supporting this position includes: - The sinking of the Lusitania - The Sussex Pledge - Wilson's decision to break off diplomatic relations with Germany - Wilson's war message to Congress, April 1917 On April 2, 1917, Wilson asked Congress for a declaration of war on Germany for the following reasons: - German submarines sinking U.S. merchant ships most influenced President Wilson's decision - German's autocratic government & Germany's plans for military victory - Sympathy for the democracies of Britain & France - The Russian Revolution - According to Wilson WWI was waged "to make the world safe for democracy" After President Wilson's second inauguration, many Americans consider his campaign slogan "He kept us out of war" ironic: because "He requested Congress issued a declaration of war on Germany" ASSESS THE INFLUENCE OF U.S.' INVOLVEMENT IN WWI ON THE FOLLOWING: - AFRICAN AMERICANS - WOMEN - CIVIL LIBERTIES - BUSINESS - PROPAGANDA African Americans - The first massive
    [Show full text]
  • The Dawn of American Cryptology, 1900–1917
    United States Cryptologic History The Dawn of American Cryptology, 1900–1917 Special Series | Volume 7 Center for Cryptologic History David Hatch is technical director of the Center for Cryptologic History (CCH) and is also the NSA Historian. He has worked in the CCH since 1990. From October 1988 to February 1990, he was a legislative staff officer in the NSA Legislative Affairs Office. Previously, he served as a Congressional Fellow. He earned a B.A. degree in East Asian languages and literature and an M.A. in East Asian studies, both from Indiana University at Bloomington. Dr. Hatch holds a Ph.D. in international relations from American University. This publication presents a historical perspective for informational and educational purposes, is the result of independent research, and does not necessarily reflect a position of NSA/CSS or any other US government entity. This publication is distributed free by the National Security Agency. If you would like additional copies, please email [email protected] or write to: Center for Cryptologic History National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6886 Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755 Cover: Before and during World War I, the United States Army maintained intercept sites along the Mexican border to monitor the Mexican Revolution. Many of the intercept sites consisted of radio-mounted trucks, known as Radio Tractor Units (RTUs). Here, the staff of RTU 33, commanded by Lieutenant Main, on left, pose for a photograph on the US-Mexican border (n.d.). United States Cryptologic History Special Series | Volume 7 The Dawn of American Cryptology, 1900–1917 David A.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Gone Mad a First World War Military History Armies Collapse
    The World Gone Mad A First World War Military History Armies Collapse Europe - 1917 Situation in January 1917 Nobody is sure who is going to win Germany has stabilized the East War cannot be won there however Serbia & Romania are out Romanian food & oil helping sustain Germany Allies trapped at Salonika (still) Italians on the Isonzo River (still) Western Front stalemate (still) BUT, the blockade is starting to bite hard “The Turnip Winter” Allied Plan for 1917 Chantilly Conference Strategy: Overwhelm the Central Powers ability to move reserves. Coordinated attacks on three fronts (four offensives) The German View GHQ had to bear in mind that the enemy’s great superiority in men and material would even be more painfully felt in 1917 than in 1916. If the war lasted, our defeat seemed inevitable. The future looked dark. General Erich Ludendorff Quartermaster General, GHQ German Plan for 1917 Germany must do something or lose the war The Plan Force the Russians out of the war Move 100+ divisions (≈ 1M men) to the western front Unrestricted submarine warfare in the N. Atlantic This will bring America into the war……but, “Rolling the iron dice” This will remove England from the war Finish off the French; WIN THE WAR!! ALL before America has an impact (1919/1920?) Given what has happened to date, this is ambitious!! Eastern Front Russian Revolution (March 1917) Provisional Government (Lvov) Russian army is disintegrating But the Russian gov’t doesn’t know it, but… …..the Germans do. The “Kerensky Offensive” (July) Complete failure Riga (1st use of Hutier Tactics) Russian army finished “Voting with their feet” Bolsheviks take over (Oct) Stormtrooper Tactics General Hutier & Colonel Bruckmüller Hand picked, highly trained, and heavily armed men Sub-machine guns Flamethrowers Massive #’s of grenades Few traditional riflemen Lot’s of artillery Key players in the East - 1917 0 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of America's Entries Into World War I and World War II
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2009 A Comparative Study of America's Entries into World War I and World War II. Samantha Alisha Taylor East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Taylor, Samantha Alisha, "A Comparative Study of America's Entries into World War I and World War II." (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1860. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1860 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Comparative Study of America's Entries into World War I and World War II _____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History _____________________ by Samantha Alisha Taylor May 2009 _____________________ Stephen Fritz, Chair Elwood Watson Ronnie Day Keywords: World War One, World War Two, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, American Entry ABSTRACT A Comparative Study of America's Entries into World War I and World War II by Samantha Alisha Taylor This thesis studies events that preceded America‟s entries into the First and Second World Wars to discover similarities and dissimilarities.
    [Show full text]
  • Communist Party of India (Marxist) XXXII, 4 October-December 2016
    marxistTheoretical Quarterly of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) XXXII, 4 October-December 2016 Editorial Note 3 Irfan Habib The Road to the October Revolution in Russia, 1917 7 Amar Farooqui The October Revolution and the National Movement in India 21 Fidel Castro Ruz When the People Rule 37 Communist Party of Portugal “We Were, Are, and Will be Communists!” 54 Communist Party of Greece “Socialism is Timely and Necessary” 68 marxistTheoretical Quarterly of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) EDITORIAL BOARD SITARAM YECHUry (EDItor) PRAKash Karat B. V. RAGHAVULU ASHOK DHAWALE C ONTRIBUtors Irfan Habib is Professor Emeritus at the Department of History, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. Amar Farooqui is Professor of History at the University of Delhi, Delhi. Fidel Castro Ruz (1926-2016) was the leader of the Cuban Revolution who served as the President of Cuba (1976-2008) and the First Secretary of the Communist Party of Cuba (1961-2011). For subscription and other queries, contact The Manager, Marxist, A.K.Gopalan Bhavan, 27-29 Bhai Veer Singh Marg, New Delhi 110001 Phone: (91-11) 2373 8725. Email: [email protected] Printed by Sitaram Yechury at Progressive Printers, A 21, Jhilmil Industrial Area, Shahdara, Delhi 110095, and published by him on behalf of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) from A.K.Gopalan Bhavan, 27-29 Bhai Veer Singh Marg, New Delhi 110001 Marxist, XXXII, 4, October-December 2016 IRFAN HABIB The Road to the October Revolution in Russia, 1917 After the British Empire, it was the Russian Empire before 1917 which by territorial extent formed the largest state in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • January 25,1917
    Rep._~ _ Journal. JANUARY BELFAST, MAINE, THURSDAY, 25, 1917. NUMBER 4 s £ ,, Today Jcuina1. The funeral of the late OBITUARY. Charles H. Sargen NEWS OF >"”> took Notes. THE GRANGES. place at bis late home, No. 46 Cede: Legislative Belfast Free to Library. .. ,r 1 doing Germany., atreet. at 2 PERSONAL. Ed for 35 a Friday p. m„ Rev. J. Wilbor C hurches. .Secret So White, aged 70, years resident o Rich. Comet Grange, Swanville, held an it; ardson of the the Governor and alhday u' Breckenridge. died suddenly while at breakfast the church At hearing before c Notes. News ol Baptiat as session Jan were NEW Mrs. H. V..fislatwe last in officiating, 16th and their officers in- BOOKS. JANUARY, 1917. J. Morris h*s returned from a viait in Real Es- Saturday morning the dining room of sisted by H. Council in Augusta last Friday afternoon Transfers Harry Upton of Colby College stalled in Boston and the Denver hotel. He had arisen at his usual Who he by District Deputy Edward Evans of vicinity. [ Bosket Ball. ..Th« at the requeat of the Clarence Higgins said that wished tb hour, and appeared in normal health, though family sang Mr Belfast, assisted Mr. and Mrs. Fred Nicker- l ibrary. state that the by Mrs. A E. Greenlaw of Camden is the |.;. before seating himself at the breakfast Sargent's favorite hymn, “Face to to all parties interested appro- Missions. guest table, Face.' son of Monroe, in an able and of Mr. 5 rd Letter..Pick* he had of not The bearers State-aided in- very pleasing and Mrs.
    [Show full text]