Challenges for Vulnerable Young People in Accessing Higher Education: a Case Study of Orange Farm Informal Settlement, South Africa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Challenges for Vulnerable Young People in Accessing Higher Education: a Case Study of Orange Farm Informal Settlement, South Africa CHALLENGES FOR VULNERABLE YOUNG PEOPLE IN ACCESSING HIGHER EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY OF ORANGE FARM INFORMAL SETTLEMENT, SOUTH AFRICA By WF MKWANANZI (Student no: 2006 0000 59) Dissertation submitted in partial requirement for the degree of Master’s in Development Studies in the FACULTY OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT at the UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE SUPERVISOR: Professor Melanie Walker BLOEMFONTEIN 2013 DECLARATION I declare that “Challenges for vulnerable young people in accessing higher education: A case study of Orange Farm informal settlement, South Africa” submitted for the Master’s in Development Studies at the Centre for Development Support, University of the Free State, is my own independent work, and has not been submitted for any degree or examination in any institution. Full Name: Wadzanai Faith Mkwananzi Signature: ………………………………… Date: ………………………… Faith ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The successful completion of this dissertation is as a result of contributions from different individuals, whom I wish to acknowledge, with gratitude: • I respect and thank my supervisor, Professor Melanie Walker, for granting me the opportunity to work on my dissertation under her guidance and support. I am grateful to her for introducing me to the capabilities approach. Her selfless sharing of knowledge and insights throughout the study has built in me an interest in social justice and higher education research. • I am extremely fortunate and grateful to have received the research scholarship from the Centre for Higher Education and Capabilities Research (CHECaR). The funding made the completion of this dissertation possible. • I am highly grateful to Doctor Sonja Loots for working through my drafts and providing valuable feedback throughout the writing process. • I owe profound gratitude to my colleague, Oliver Mutanga, for dedicating time to go through my work and share ideas. • I am thankful to the whole CHECaR research team for constant encouragement and support. My sincere thanks to Lucretia Smith for her timely support in administrative matters related to my study. • I would not forget all the research participants who agreed to be interviewed, thereby making this study possible. ii Faith KEYWORDS Access Agency Aspirations Capability approach Challenges Conversion factors Disadvantaged Freedom Higher education Human development Social justice Vulnerable young people Orange Farm iii Faith ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS CA – Capabilities approach CBO – Community-based organisation CHE – Council of Higher Education DHET – Department of Higher Education and Training DoE – Department of Education HDR – Human Development Report HE – Higher education NGO – Non-governmental organisation NPHE – National Plan for Higher Education UNAIDS – United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS UNCRC – United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child UNICEF – United Nations Children’s Fund iv Faith ABSTRACT This study outlines the challenges for vulnerable young people in accessing higher education, based on a case study conducted at Orange Farm informal settlement. Statistics show that student enrolment in higher education (HE) institutions has dramatically increased over the past years, from 473 000 (CHE, 1999) in 1993 to 938 201 in 2011, a clear indication that HE is increasingly addressing issues of access. Despite these positive trends, which should greatly benefit previously marginalised communities, there are still marginalised groups in our society which we know little about. This study seeks to build wider awareness of one such group, vulnerable young people. One way of highlighting what is needed by vulnerable young people to access HE is through the capabilities approach (CA). The CA addresses issues of aspirations, agency and conversion factors, and has been used to analyse the situation of deprived people and create policies that give them access to the necessary resources and the ability to make choices (Alkire, 2002). In approaching vulnerability, Misztal’s (2011) three types of vulnerabilities, namely dependence on others, unpredictability and irreversibility will be used. Since this study is concerned with individual attitudes, perceptions and opinions rather than statistics, the researcher adopted a qualitative approach. The primary data collection strategy was face-to-face interviews with selected young people living in care and with their caregivers. Two graduates were also interviewed to determine whether they experienced similar challenges than those faced by young people today. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. The findings from the data revealed little difference between the challenges that the young people are faced with currently and those experienced by graduates in the past. v Faith TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................. ii KEYWORDS .................................................................................................................................. iii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................................................... iv ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................... v TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ vi LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................... x LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................xi CORE ELEMENTS OF THE STUDY ........................................................................................... xii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH PROBLEM .............................................. 2 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................... 2 Problem statement ....................................................................................................... 3 Research argument ..................................................................................................... 3 Research aim and questions ....................................................................................... 3 Value of the study ................................................................................................................. 4 CHAPTER OUTLINE ............................................................................................................ 4 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 2: CONTEXT AND CONCEPTUAL ORIENTATION ............................................. 7 VULNERABILITY .................................................................................................................. 7 Defining “vulnerable young people” .......................................................................... 7 Conceptualising vulnerability ..................................................................................... 8 CONTEXTUALISING HIGHER EDUCATION IN SOUTH AFRICA ........................................ 9 The South African Constitution ................................................................................ 10 The White Paper on Education and Training (1997 ................................................. 11 The Higher Education Act (Act 101 of 1997) ............................................................ 11 The 2001 National Plan for Higher Education .......................................................... 11 The 2012 National Development Plan ....................................................................... 12 ORANGE FARM ................................................................................................................. 12 Poverty ....................................................................................................................... 13 HIV/AIDS prevalence in Orange Farm ....................................................................... 15 Education ................................................................................................................... 16 Developments ............................................................................................................ 16 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 17 vi Faith CHAPTER 3: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ........................................................................ 19 BACKGROUND TO MAINSTREAM DEVELOPMENT APPROACHES ............................... 19 Participatory approach to development ................................................................... 19 Basic needs approach ............................................................................................... 20 Human centred approach .......................................................................................... 20 Human scale development ........................................................................................ 20 THE CAPABILITIES APPROACH ......................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • CITY of JOHANNESBURG – 24 May 2013 Structure of Presentation
    2012/13 and 2013/14 BEPP/USDG REVIEW Portfolio Committee CITY OF JOHANNESBURG – 24 May 2013 Structure of Presentation 1. Overview of the City’s Development Agenda – City’s Urban Trends – Development Strategy and Approach – Capex process and implementation 2. Part One: 2012/13 Expenditure – Quarter One USDG expenditure 2012/13 – Quarter Two USDG expenditure 2012/13 – Quarter Three USDG expenditure 2012/13 – Quarter Four USDG expenditure 2012/13 – Recovery plan on 2012/13 USDG expenditure Part Two: 2013/14 Expenditure – Impact of the USDG for 2013/14 – Prioritization of 2013/14 projects 2 JOHANNESBURG DEMOGRAPHICS • Total Population – 4.4 million • 36% of Gauteng population • 8% of national population • Johanesburg is growing faster than the Gauteng Region • COJ population increase by 38% between 2001 and 2011. JOHANNESBURG POPULATION PYRAMID Deprivation Index Population Deprivation Index Based on 5 indicators: •Income •Employment •Health •Education •Living Environment 5 Deprivation / Density Profile Based on 5 indicators: •Income •Employment •Health •Education • Living Environment Development Principles PROPOSED BUILDINGS > LIBERTY LIFE,FOCUS AROUND MULTI SANDTON CITY SANDTON FUNCTIONAL CENTRES OF ACTIVITY AT REGIONAL AND LOCAL SCALE BARA TRANSPORT FACILITY, SOWETO NEWTOWN MAKING TRANSPORTATION WORK FOR ALL RIDGE WALK TOWARDS STRETFORD STATION BRT AS BACKBONE ILLOVO BOULEVARD BUILD-UP AROUND PUBLIC TRANSPORT NODESVRIVONIA ROADAND FACING LOWDENSGATE CORRIDORS URBAN RESTRUCTURING INVESTMENT IN ADEQUATE INFRASTRUCTURE IN STRATEGIC LOCATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Orange Farm Report.Indd
    THE IMPACT OF THE COMMUNITY WORK PROGRAMME ON VIOLENCE IN ORANGE FARM Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (CSVR) study on the Community Work Programme (CWP) Malose Langa August 2015 Acknowledgements This report is based on research carried out in Orange Farm in 2014. I would like to thank the many people, including staff and participants within the Community Work Programme and others, who contributed to the research by participating in interviews and focus groups and in other ways. The research was also supported by feedback from members of the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (CSVR) Urban Violence Study Group, including Hugo van der Merwe, Themba Masuku, Jasmina Brankovic, Kindisa Ngubeni and David Bruce. Many others at CSVR also assisted with this work in one way or another. David Bruce assisted with the editing of the report. © September 2015, Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation 3rd Floor, Forum V, Braampark Office Park, 33 Hoofd Street, Braamfontein P O Box 30778, Braamfontein, 2017, South Africa; Tel: (011) 403-5650. Fax: (011) 388-0819. Email: [email protected]. CSVR website: http://www.csvr.org.za This work was carried out with financial support from the UK Government’s Department for International Development and the International Development Research Centre, Canada. The opinions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of DFID or IDRC. International Development Research Centre Centre de recherches pour le développement international Table of Contents Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • SIDA Gauteng 2011[2].Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Letter from Ria Schoeman PhD 4 Abbreviations and Acronyms 4 Helpline and Hotlines in South Africa MUNICIPALITIES 5 City of Johannesburg 29 City of Tshwane 45 Ekurhuleni 61 Metsweding 64 Sedibeng 72 West Rand 1 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ARV: Antiretroviral OVC: Orphans and Vulnerable Children PMTCT Prevention of Mother-To-Child Transmission STI: Sexually transmitted infection HELPLINE AND HOTLINES IN SOUTH AFRICA Abortion Helpline 080 117 785 Aid for AIDS Helpline 0860 100 646 Alcoholics Anonymous 0861 HELPAA (0861 435 722) Ambulance (Private) 082 911 Ambulance (Public) 10177 Cell phone Emergency Number 112 Child Victims of Sexual, Emotional 0800 035 553 and Physical Abuse Helpline Childline 0800 055 555 Crime Stop 0860 010 111 Department of Education Helpline 0800 202 933 Department of Health Helpline 0800 005 133 Department of Home Affairs Hotline 0800 601 190 Department of Social Development 0800 121 314 Substance Abuse Helpline Emergency Contraception Hotline 0800 246 432 Gay and Lesbian Network Helpline 0860 333 331 HIV Medicines Helpline 0800 212 506 HIV-911 Referral Centre 0860 HIV 911 (0860 448 911) Human Rights Advice Line 0860 120 120 Lifeline Southern Africa 0861 322 322 Legal Aid South Africa Advice Line 0800 204 473 loveLife Sexual Health Line 0800 121 900 (thetha junction) Marie Stopes Clinic Toll Free Number 0800 117 785 mothers2mothers 0800 668 4377 MRI Criticare Emergency Service 0800 111 990 National AIDS Helpline 0800 012 322 National HIV Health Care Workers Hotline 0800 212 506 National Youth Information
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic Projections
    Demographic Projections This section represents a summary of the demographic projections and statistics utilised in understanding the situational analysis for the SHSUP. A detailed report was submitted in the first Phase of the SHSUP and guided the findings and future processes of the plan. Estimated Population / Household Growth In developing the SHSUP with a longer-term time horizon, the City has utilised a demographic projection that was developed in conjunction with the CSIR. Supplementary inputs have been made by the lead Project Team’s associate, Demacon. The projections and “headline” statistics were the basis of the modelling component of the SHSUP and were utilised in the development and testing of the model. Tables 3 and 4 illustrate the anticipated growth of population and households between 2010 and 2030. There were three scenarios considered, a Base, Low and High rate of growth. For the purposes of the model, the Base scenario was selected as the most appropriate scenario for future growth. The projections of this Base scenario suggest that the population would grow from 3.7 million to 4.3 million within the 20 year time period. In terms of household growth, this translates into an additional 460,000 households (29,500 people / 23,300 households per annum). What is important to note is the large discrepancy between the high and low projections. In terms of the population count, this differs by as much as 2 million (representing a 36% population growth between 2010 and 2030 on the High projection) and a 2% increase on the low
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY CLINICS 1.1 Johannesburg Metro District Area (1)
    COMMUNITY CLINICS 1.1 Johannesburg Metro District Area (1) JMD - Adult Specialist Psychiatric Clinics DR. CLINICS ADDRESS TELEPHONE REPEAT CLINICS CLINICS 77 Ingelby Rd Brixton (011) 837-7449 A. Patel (Mon-Fri) Tuesday Crosby S.Dlalisa| K. Manthoko| 17 Rihlampfu St Chiawelo (011) 984-8336 C.Seguba (sessional) Monday Chiawelo (Tues-Thurs) Discoverers Hospital, T.Manana | R. Singo Discoverers (011) 674-1200 Thursday Corner Goldman Mon-(Wednesday) &Mitchell Street J.Mavundla | C. Diyane| 34 Elias Motsoaledi Dobsonville (011) 988-1820 Z Melato (sessional) Tuesdays Road, Soweto (Mon, Wed, Thursday) Corner Impala & K.Moagi|P.Mhlambi East bank (011) 443-7828 Tuesdays Springbok Rd (Mon- Fri) V.Nyembe| L. Eldorado 21Ascot Road, Ext (011) 342- 1164 Mthethwa Friday Park 8, Eldorado Park (Mon-Thurs) Corner Katz &Smith Ennerdale 0730069508, M.Latedisa | R. Kantoro Friday Walk ,Ext9, Ext 9 0828575972 (Mon-Wed) Ennerdale Hillbrow Community Health Centre, E.Gatlane| E. Mabaso Hillbrow (011) 694-3755 Tues Corner Smith and (Mon-Fri) Klein Str 34 Ford Str, B. Ndlazi|J. Makgatho Jeppe (011) 614- 7233 Friday Jeppestown (Monday-Thurs) 95 Nirvana Drive, N.Khumalo |G.Khan Lenasia (011) 852-3823 Mon Lenasia ( Tues-Thurs) Lenasia 3 Cosmos Str, (011) 213- T. Gamede (Mon- Friday South Lenasia South 9600/9631 Thurs) Hekroodt Circle, S.Mnguni| R. Yumba Meadowlands Zone 2, (011) 936-4613 Friday (Mon-Thurs) Meadowlands Old Potch Rd Kwa- W.Melato| L.Gova Thursday Lillian Ngoyi (011) 938-1556 Xuma 1804 (Mon-Fri) 1412 Elias N.Tsotetsi|M.Mnembe| Mofolo Motsoaledi Rd, (011) 982 5542 K. Konyane (sessional) Tuesday Mofolo South (Mon&Wed) D.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalytic Projects Summary Fact Sheet
    CATALYTIC PROJECTS SUMMARY FACT SHEET PROJECT NAME Syferfontein LOCALITY MAP _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ April 2016 Technical Report Completed September 2016 Fact Sheet Completed CATALYTIC PROJECTS SUMMARY FACT SHEET PROJECT NAME Syferfontein LAND CONDITION Greenfield DEVELOPER Gauteng Province CLASSIFICATION Project Not Ready PROVINCE Gauteng MUNICIPALITY Westonaria The land development area is located in the south-western extents of Gauteng Province, to the west of the N1 and south of the N12 freeways. It forms part of a cluster of predominantly residential developments including Kagiso, Leratong, Lufhereng, Soweto, Protea Glen, Lenasia, Lawley, Ennerdale, Orange Farm, Evaton and Sebokeng, most of which are part of the City of Johannesburg. The project is located within the jurisdiction of Westonaria Local Municipality, more specifically to the south of Bekkersdal settlement. The objective of Syferfontein Mixed Housing Development is to create a new city in Westonaria that provides for a sustainable mixed use, mixed income and mixed density city with capacity for 60 128 housing opportunities. The development will cater for the population growth and influx experienced in the West Rand and south Gauteng, and enhance integration between Westonaria PROJECT and the City of Johannesburg(CoJ). DESCRIPTION The development is regarded as an economic intervention in the area because it will draw economic activities to an area with current lack of infrastructure and services. The bulk of the development will comprise of medium to higher density residential development, and supplemented with a comprehensive range of community facilities, retail, commercial and even light industrial activity. Even though the development area is located wholly within Westonaria Local Municipality, four of the properties are registered in the name of the City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Land Planning, Transport Poverty and Sustainable Cities: the Case of Johannesburg
    COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujdigispace.uj.ac.za (Accessed: Date). Historical land planning, transport poverty and sustainable cities: the case of Johannesburg Dr Michelle Claire Lawton Department of Geography, Environmental Management and Energy Studies Faculty of Science University of Johannesburg Mini-dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment for the degree Masters of Science in Environmental Management Supervisor: Mrs Tracey J. McKay Co-Supervisor: Dr June Meeuwis December 2014 ANTI-PLAGIARISM DECLARATION University of Johannesburg Department of Geography, Environmental Management & Energy Studies Title: Dr Full name: Michelle Claire Lawton Student number: 909906451 Course: Mini dissertation MSc in Environmental Management 1. I understand what plagiarism is and am aware of the University’s policy in this regard. 2. I know that plagiarism is wrong. Plagiarism is to present someone else’s ideas as my own. I know that I would plagiarise if I do not give credit to my sources, or if I lift sentences or paragraphs from a book, article or internet source without proper citation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 BOMMASTANDI of ALEXANDRA TOWNSHIP
    Chapter 1 BOMMASTANDI OF ALEXANDRA TOWNSHIP 1.1. Background In 1912 the following billboard written in Sotho, Zulu and English appeared in Alexandra Township advertising freehold properties. First, this advert points to the obvious; Africans were already engaging in private property at the turn of the 20th century. This township was subdivided into 2,500 stands which were sold to individuals. Title deeds were given to the individuals once payment was concluded. Second, it indicates that Africans were acquiring private property away from a „traditional village‟ where access to property is said to be communal. A closer look at the acquisition processes of such properties unsettles the notion of private property as individual. It becomes increasingly clear in the study that in spite of the naming of an individual in the titled deed it was not uncommon for family resources to be pooled during acquisition of the said property and hence a shared ownership among members of extended families would be understood. The following conversations attest to some of these experiences. Mme Mihloti explains how her parents and her siblings purchased their properties. 1 Ko 15th o ka re ke nako e abuti a bereka le mosu ausi, ke bona ba neng ba thusa mokgalabe. ......... Bona ke itse ba berekile ba thusa, ba ntshitse chelete ausi le abuti, ena Lucas. …….1 (It seemes like when my brother and sister were working, they are the ones who helped the old man with purchasing the property at 15th Avenue. I do know that they contributed some money helping our father in acquiring the properties…… Another example is drawn from mme Hunadi‟s family.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Johannesburg Ward Councillors by Region, Suburbs and Political Party
    CITY OF JOHANNESBURG WARD COUNCILLORS BY REGION, SUBURBS AND POLITICAL PARTY No. Councillor Name/Surname & Par Region: Ward Ward Suburbs: Ward Administrator: Cotact Details: ty: No: 1. Cllr. Msingathi Mazibukwana ANC G 1 Streford 5,6,7,8 and 9 Phase 1, Bongani Dlamini 078 248 0981 2 and 3 082 553 7672 011 850 1008 011 850 1097 [email protected] 2. Cllr. Dimakatso Jeanette Ramafikeng ANC G 2 Lakeside 1,2,3 and 5 Mzwanele Dloboyi 074 574 4774 Orange Farm Ext.1 part of 011 850 1071 011 850 116 083 406 9643 3. Cllr. Lucky Mbuso ANC G 3 Orange Farm Proper Ext 4, 6 Bongani Dlamini 082 550 4965 and 7 082 553 7672 011 850 1073 011 850 1097 4. Cllr. Simon Mlekeleli Motha ANC G 4 Orange Farm Ext 2,8 & 9 Mzwanele Dloboyi 082 550 4965 Drieziek 1 011 850 1071 011 850 1073 Drieziek Part 4 083 406 9643 [email protected] 5. Cllr. Penny Martha Mphole ANC G 5 Dreziek 1,2,3,5 and 6 Mzwanele Dloboyi 082 834 5352 Poortjie 011 850 1071 011 850 1068 Streford Ext 7 part 083 406 9643 [email protected] Stretford Ext 8 part Kapok Drieziek Proper 6. Shirley Nepfumbada ANC G 6 Kanama park (weilers farm) Bongani Dlamini 076 553 9543 Finetown block 1,2,3 and 5 082 553 7672 010 230 0068 Thulamntwana 011 850 1097 Mountain view 7. Danny Netnow DA G 7 Ennerdale 1,3,6,10,11,12,13 Mzwanele Dloboyi 011 211-0670 and 14 011 850 1071 078 665 5186 Mid – Ennerdale 083 406 9643 [email protected] Finetown Block 4 and 5 (part) Finetown East ( part) Finetown North Meriting 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Mapping: Using Local Knowledge for Planning Health
    Stadler et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2013, 13:96 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/13/96 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Cognitive mapping: using local knowledge for planning health research Jonathan Stadler1*, Charles Dugmore2, Emilie Venables1, Catherine MacPhail1 and Sinead Delany-Moretlwe1 Abstract Background: Cognitive mapping is a participatory research methodology that documents, in visual form, a construct of the local environment in which people live and work. We adapted this method to provide detailed data about study locales to inform recruitment and retention strategies for HIV prevention community based clinical trials. Methods: Four cognitive mapping studies were undertaken between 2005 and 2010, in and around Johannesburg in Orange Farm, and Hillbrow. Participants included members of clinical trial Community Advisory Boards (CAB), young people recruited from schools in Hillbrow and an organization for out of school youth, and men recruited from a database of men in the community interested in taking part in research. These groups participated in reconnaissance walks and in depth interviews, and drew detailed sketch maps. Results: The cognitive maps defined the physical boundaries of the research locales, provided insights into their social histories, and identified important characteristics of the population such as movement, social and sexual networks, ethnic and other divisions. Important differences between the official cartographic maps and the cognitive maps were raised. The mapping data was applied by identifying key areas for recruitment that recruitment staff members were less familiar with and that may otherwise have been overlooked. Conclusions: Cognitive mapping is an effective, rapid and low cost method that can be used to inform recruitment and retention strategies for community-based clinical trial research.
    [Show full text]
  • 150 6-5-2015 Gautliq Layout 1
    T E U N A G THE PROVINCE OF G DIE PROVINSIE UNITY DIVERSITY GAUTENG P IN GAUTENG R T O N V E IN M C RN IAL GOVE Provincial Gazette Extraordinary Buitengewone Provinsiale Koerant Selling price . Verkoopprys: R2,50 Other countries . Buitelands: R3,25 MAY Vol. 21 PRETORIA, 6 2015 MEI No. 150 We oil hawm he power to preftvent kllDc AIDS HEIRINE 0800 012 322 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Prevention is the cure N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 501528—A 150—1 2 No. 150 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY, 6 MAY 2015 ANNUAL PRICE INCREASE FOR PUBLICATION OF A LIQUOR LICENCE: FOR THE FOLLOWING PROVINCES: (AS FROM 1 APRIL 2015) GAUTENG LIQUOR LICENCES: R221.00. NORTHERN CAPE LIQUOR LICENCES: R221.60. ALL OTHER PROVINCES: R134.70. CONTENTS • INHOUD Page Gazette No. No. No. GENERAL NOTICE 1422 Gauteng Liquor Act (2/2003): Applications for liquor licences in terms of section 24: Divided into the following regions: ................................................... Johannesburg ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 150 Tshwane.................................................................................................................................................................. 22 150 Ekurhuleni..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies Employed by Orange Farm Caregivers of Children with Disabiliti
    101 “Our children have the right to an education too”: Strategies Employed by Orange Farm Caregivers of Children with Disabilities in Pursuit of the Right to a Basic Education Jean Elphick1*, Zosa De SasKropiwnicki2, Rosalind Elphick3 1. Operational Manager of Afrika Tikkun Empowerment Programme,&Department of Anthropology and Development Studies, University of Johannesburg, South Africa 2. Senior Lecturer, Department of Anthropology and Development Studies, University of Johannesburg, South Africa 3. Research Fellow of the University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa ABSTRACT Purpose: This paper aims to understand the agency that caregivers who participated in a CBR empowerment component programme exercised, in order to promote the rights of their children with disabilities to a basic education. Methods: An interdisciplinary theoretical framework and qualitative methodology were used to examine the agency and the opportunity structures within which the caregivers operate. Focus group discussions, case study interviews and secondary Programme data were analysed using manual thematic analysis. Results: Thousands of children with disabilities in South Africa are effectively denied the right to a basic education as a result of discriminatory norms, stigmatising discourses and unjust power relations. Yet, a group of caregivers have successfully advocated for their children with disabilities in the township of Orange Farm, Gauteng. Their lobbying has contributed to the establishment, by the State, of a new school. Conclusion and Implications: The findings suggest that human rights advocacy movements, as well as disability organisations, would do well to recognise and encourage the power and agency possessed by caregivers of children with disabilities. Catalysing civic action and providing opportunities for active citizenry and self-help seem to nurture increased efficacy and competence at navigating systems and accessing rights.
    [Show full text]