American-Style Justice in No Man's Land Peter Nicolas University of Washington School of Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American-Style Justice in No Man's Land Peter Nicolas University of Washington School of Law University of Washington School of Law UW Law Digital Commons Articles Faculty Publications 2002 American-Style Justice in No Man's Land Peter Nicolas University of Washington School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, and the Jurisdiction Commons Recommended Citation Peter Nicolas, American-Style Justice in No Man's Land, 36 Ga. L. Rev. 895 (2002), https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty- articles/297 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEORGIA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 36 SUMMER 2002 NuMBER 4 ARTICLE AMERICAN-STYLE JUSTICE IN NO MAN'S LAND PeterNicolas* I. INTRODUCTION For much of the nineteenth century, the geographic region known today as the Oklahoma Panhandle and bounded on the east by the hundredth meridian of longitude, on the south by Texas, on the west by New Mexico, and on the north by Colorado and Kansas, was commonly referred to as the Public Land Strip, the Neutral Strip, or more ominously, "No Man's Land."1 The region was so-named * Assistant Professor, University of Washington School of Law. The author would like to thank Wendy Condiotty, Magdalena Cuprys, Ann Hemmens, Paul Holcomb, Nancy McMurrer, Cheryl Nyberg, Barbara Swatt, Lisa Wagenheim and the editors of the Georgia Law Review for their valuable research, feedback and assistance. 1 See Act of May 2, 1890, ch. 182, § 1, 26 Stat. 81, 81-82 (describing territory "commonly called No Man's Land"); Cook v. United States, 138 U.S. 157, 165 (1891) ("ITIhe Public Land Strip, ... commonly called No Man's Land .... is 167 miles in length, 34% miles in width, lies between the 100th meridian of longitude and the Territory of New Mexico, and is bounded on the south by that part of Texas known as the Panhandle, and by Kansas and Colorado on the north."); JEFFREY BURTON, INDIAN TERRITORY AND THEUNITED STATES, 1866-1906: COURTS, GOVERNMENT, AND THE MOVEMENT FOR OKLAHOMA STATEHOOD 4 (1995) CWest of the hundredth meridian is a neck of land containing 5,672 square miles now known as the 895 896 GEORGIA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 36:895 because, for much of the nineteenth century, it fell outside of the jurisdiction of any state or territorial, and, seemingly, any federal court.2 This unusual circumstance was the result of a geographic gap created by the federal statutes defining the boundaries of Texas, Colorado; New Mexico, Kansas, and Indian Territory. Given the evident lack of any court with jurisdiction over No Man's Land, it was perhaps inevitable4 that the region became the setting for a notorious murder, known as the Massacre of Wild Horse Lake.' On July 25, 1888, a group of Kansans associated with one faction of local Kansas politics, led by one Cyrus E. Cook, ambushed and murdered four other Kansans associated with a rival political faction inside the boundaries of No Man's Land.6 After the Oklahoma Panhandle and formerly called the Public Land Strip, Neutral Land Strip, or No Man's Land."). 2 See BURTON, supra note 1, at 4 (It was not part of Indian Territory and was not attached to any State or Territory until it was included in Oklahoma Territory under the provisions of the Organic act of May 2, 1890."); THE FEDERAL COURTS OFTHE TENTH CIRCUIT: AHISTORY 180 (James K. Logan, ed., 1992) ("The Oklahoma panhandle, Indian country west ofthe 100th meridian, remained beyond any federal or state jurisdiction, literally a No Man's Land, until 1889.") [hereinafter FEDERAL COURTS OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT]. See generally BURTON, supra note 1, at 160-61. 3 See Act of Jan. 6, 1883, ch. 13, § 2, 22 Stat. 400, 400 (providing "all that part of the Indian Territory lying north of the Canadian river and east of Texas and the one hundredth meridian not set apart and occupied by the Cherokee, Creek, and Seminole... shall... be annexed to and constitute a part of the United States judicial district of Kansas."); Act of Feb. 28, 1861, ch. 59, § 1, 12 Stat. 172, 172 (defining boundaries of Colorado territory); Act of May 30, 1854, ch. 59, § 19, 10 Stat. 277, 283 (defining southern boundary of Kansas); Act of Sept. 9, 1850, ch. 49, § 1, 9 Stat. 446, 446 (defining boundaries for State of Texas); id. § 2, 9 Stat. 446, 447 (defining eastern boundary of New Mexico territory as running from intersection of "the thirty-second degree of north latitude ... with the one hundred and third degree of longitude west of Greenwich; thence north with said degree of longitude to the parallel of thirty-eighth degree of north latitude .... "); Cook v. United States, 138 U.S. 157, 166 (1891) ("[A]t the date of the alleged homicide the Public Land Strip was not within the jurisdiction of any particular state or federal district, .... "). " The inevitability was not necessarily due to the inherent lawlessness of the people actually resident in No Man's Land, as most of the violent episodes resulted from the actions of outsiders. See Elmer E. Brown, No Man's Land-Note on Early Settlement, in 4 CHRONICLES OF OKLAHOMA, No. 2, 89, 98 (1926) ('In the years without legal restraint only three or four homicides occurred which were the result of differences between residents. The outstanding cases of homicide were due to differences between residents of the states temporarily in No-Man's-Land."); BURTON, supranote 1, at 160 ("But even this period, before No-Man's-Land was brought by statute into the Paris division of the Eastern District of Texas, knew only a few isolated cases of murder among those actually living in the Neutral Strip."). 5 FEDERAL COURTS OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT, supra note 2, at 181. 6 Id.; BURTON, supra note 1, at 160; GEORGE RAINEY, No MAN'S LAND: THE HISTORIC 20021 NO MAN'S LAND 897 incident occurred, the perpetrators made no secret of their act and indeed boasted of it, believing themselves to be immune from prosecution since the killing occurred in No Man's Land.7 The incident thus raised an interesting jurisdictional question: Can you literally get away with murder if you kill someone in No Man's Land? Throughout this country's history, as American trade and expansionism have taken Americans westward and around the globe, Congress has used its authority to create and define the jurisdiction of the federal courts to fill jurisdictional gaps in geographic enclaves where the alternative is no forum at all. In some instances, Congress has simply extended the territorial reach of an existing Article III federal district court. In the case of No Man's Land, for example, shortly after the Massacre of Wild Horse Lake, Congress vested the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas with judicial jurisdiction over the region,8 even though it fell outside the boundaries of the State of Texas.9 In other instances, Congress has created new, specialized federal courts having jurisdiction over disputes arising within a particular geographic region, as it has done for most of the U.S. territories." In addition to using the federal courts to serve this geographic gap-filling function, Congress has also used its authority over the courts to provide a federal forum where the existing fora, while theoretically available, were perceived by Congress as inadequate to protect the rights of particular parties either due to parochial bias or other actual or perceived deficiencies. In some such instances, Congress has vested existing Article III federal courts with jurisdic- tion over disputes involving particular parties, as in the case of STORY OFALANDED ORPHAN 198-204 (Enid, Oklahoma, privately published 1937). 7 RAINEY, supra note 6, at 204. a Act of Mar. 1,1889, ch. 333, § 17,25 Stat. 783,786. The following year, Congress made No Man's Land a part of the newly created Oklahoma Territory, thus placing it under the jurisdiction of the Oklahoma territorial courts. Act of May 2, 1890, ch. 182, § 1, 26 Stat. 81, 81-82. 9 See Act of Mar. 1, 1889, ch. 333, § 1, 25 Stat. 783, 783 (defining Indian Territory boundaries, thus describing it as including region known as No Man's Land). 10 See, e.g., 48 U.S.C. § 1821(a) (1994) CThere is established for and within the Northern Mariana Islands a court of record to be known as the District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands."). 898 GEORGIA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 36:895 diversity and alienage jurisdiction, where the risk of state court bias" prompted Congress to provide for federal court jurisdiction over most disputes between citizens of different states 12 and between a citizen of a state and a citizen of a foreign state." In other instances, Congress has created new, specialized federal courts to adjudicate disputes arising in foreign countries involving American citizens, such as the United States Court for China,'4 which was established to protect U.S. nationals from what was perceived to be "barbarous and cruel punishments inflicted" by the courts of non-Christian countries. 5 " See THE FEDERALIST NO. 80, at 495 (Alexander Hamilton) (Henry Cabot Lodge ed., 1888) C'[The peace of the WHOLE ought not to be left at the disposal of a PART."); id. at 497. [I]n order to the inviolable maintenance of that equality of privileges and immunities to which the citizens of the Union will be entitled, the national judiciary ought to preside in all cases in which one State or its citizens are opposed to another State or its citizens.
Recommended publications
  • Oklahoma Territory 1889-1907
    THE DIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE SOME ASPECTS OF LIFE IN THE "LAND OP THE PAIR GOD"; OKLAHOMA TERRITORY, 1889=1907 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OP PHILOSOPHY BY BOBBY HAROLD JOHNSON Norman, Oklahoma 1967 SOME ASPECTS OP LIFE IN THE "LAND OF THE FAIR GOD"; OKLAHOMA TERRITORY, 1889-1907 APPROVED BY DISSERTATION COMMITT If Jehovah delight in us, then he will bring us into this land, and give it unto us; a land which floweth with milk and honey. Numbers li^sS I am boundfor the promised land, I am boundfor the promised land; 0 who will come and go with me? 1 am bound for the promised land. Samuel Stennett, old gospel song Our lot is cast in a goodly land and there is no land fairer than the Land of the Pair God. Milton W, Reynolds, early Oklahoma pioneer ill PREFACE In December, 1892, the editor of the Oklahoma School Herald urged fellow Oklahomans to keep accurate records for the benefit of posterity* "There is a time coming, if the facts can be preserved," he noted, "when the pen of genius and eloquence will take hold of the various incidents con­ nected with the settlement of what will then be the magnifi» cent state of Oklahoma and weave them into a story that will verify the proverb that truth is more wonderful than fic­ tion." While making no claim to genius or eloquence, I have attempted to fulfill the editor's dream by treating the Anglo-American settlement of Oklahoma Territory from 1889 to statehood in 1907» with emphasis upon social and cultural developments* It has been my purpose not only to describe everyday life but to show the role of churches, schools, and newspapers, as well as the rise of the medical and legal professions* My treatment of these salient aspects does not profess to tell the complete story of life in Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • The Osage Nation, the Midnight Rider, and the EPA
    CLEAN MY LAND: AMERICAN INDIANS, TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY by RAYMOND ANTHONY NOLAN B.A., University of Redlands, 1998 M.A., St. Mary’s College of California, 2001 M.A., Fort Hays State University, 2007 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2015 Abstract This dissertation is a case study of the Isleta Pueblos of central New Mexico, the Quapaw tribe of northeast Oklahoma, and the Osage Nation of northcentral Oklahoma, and their relationship with the federal government, and specifically the Environmental Protection Agency. As one of the youngest federal agencies, operating during the Self-Determination Era, it seems the EPA would be open to new approaches in federal Indian policy. In reality, the EPA has not reacted much differently than any other historical agency of the federal government. The EPA has rarely recognized the ability of Indians to take care of their own environmental problems. The EPA’s unwillingness to recognize tribal sovereignty was no where clearer than in 2005, when Republican Senator James Inhof of Oklahoma added a rider to his transportation bill that made it illegal in Oklahoma for tribes to gain primary control over their environmental protection programs without first negotiating with, and gaining permission of, the state government of Oklahoma. The rider was an erosion of the federal trust relationship with American Indian tribes (as tribes do not need to heed state laws over federal laws) and an attack on native ability to judge tribal affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Territory Inventory
    Shirley Papers 180 Research Materials, General Reference, Oklahoma Territory Inventory Box Folder Folder Title Research Materials General Reference Oklahoma Territory 251 1 West of Hell’s Fringe 2 Oklahoma 3 Foreword 4 Bugles and Carbines 5 The Crack of a Gun – A Great State is Born 6-8 Crack of a Gun 252 1-2 Crack of a Gun 3 Provisional Government, Guthrie 4 Hell’s Fringe 5 “Sooners” and “Soonerism” – A Bloody Land 6 US Marshals in Oklahoma (1889-1892) 7 Deputies under Colonel William C. Jones and Richard L. walker, US marshals for judicial district of Kansas at Wichita (1889-1890) 8 Payne, Ransom (deputy marshal) 9 Federal marshal activity (Lurty Administration: May 1890 – August 1890) 10 Grimes, William C. (US Marshal, OT – August 1890-May 1893) 11 Federal marshal activity (Grimes Administration: August 1890 – May 1893) 253 1 Cleaver, Harvey Milton (deputy US marshal) 2 Thornton, George E. (deputy US marshal) 3 Speed, Horace (US attorney, Oklahoma Territory) 4 Green, Judge Edward B. 5 Administration of Governor George W. Steele (1890-1891) 6 Martin, Robert (first secretary of OT) 7 Administration of Governor Abraham J. Seay (1892-1893) 8 Burford, Judge John H. 9 Oklahoma Territorial Militia (organized in 1890) 10 Judicial history of Oklahoma Territory (1890-1907) 11 Politics in Oklahoma Territory (1890-1907) 12 Guthrie 13 Logan County, Oklahoma Territory 254 1 Logan County criminal cases 2 Dyer, Colonel D.B. (first mayor of Guthrie) 3 Settlement of Guthrie and provisional government 1889 4 Land and lot contests 5 City government (after
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog 2020-21
    CATALOG 2020-2021 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY-OKLAHOMA CITY CATALOG 2020-2021 ACADEMIC POLICIES 1 CATALOG 2020-2021 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY-OKLAHOMA CITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Administration ..............................................................................................................................3 Academic Calendar .......................................................................................................................3 Oklahoma State University-Oklahoma City ...................................................................................4 Services to Students ......................................................................................................................6 Assistance, Resources, Policies .....................................................................................................8 Student Life.................................................................................................................................11 Security .......................................................................................................................................13 Financial Aid ...............................................................................................................................17 Business Services........................................................................................................................22 Money Matters ............................................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • United States Courts Eighth Circuit Report 1982
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. UNITED STATES COURTS EIGHTH CIRCUIT REPORT 1982 ) P. LAY LESTER C. GOODCHILD Idge Circuit Executive 1/ , " ~¥L·"'J'~;""J,!J:!:~u::.t>;~;"';"'~"\;ti""o:4i,,*,'}~~~i'ii:I&~';:I;"1',\.~~;;'- ..,....:....:\.. · ........ b__ ,:, ''\-' _.':t. un ",a) '~,~ ,"-!.. ~,--.,.&·~".d"_.-~'''~.,.''''''''!_ ..~_,~'\_>"'''"&!~ ____ ---=..-~~l''.Co"",. ~">':>-".""". "",~""",, ,,'.'. "'._o_d'A,." .... " _ "_.'~".""" l0785~ U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this documer.t are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this c~d material has been granted by Public Domain united States Courts to the National Criminal Jus'ice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the c~ owner. _. .., UNITED STATES COURTS EIGHTH CIRCUIT REPORT ,19>82 DONALD P. LAY LESTER C. GOODCHILD Chief Judge ' Circuit Executive ' FORWARD This report is issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 332 (e) (10). The format follows '?he report issued last year for the calendar years 1980 and 1981. Sections I and II provide information relating to the members of the JUdicial family, the support staff and the administration of the Federal Courts. Section III presents operational data relating to the Judicial process within the Court of Appeals and the District Courts in the Eighth Circuit. Wherever possible data appearing in last years report is updated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Five Minute History of Oklahoma
    Chronicles of Oklahoma Volume 13, No. 4 December, 1935 Five Minute History of Oklahoma Patrick J. Hurley 373 Address in Commemoration of Wiley Post before the Oklahoma State Society of Washington D. C. Paul A. Walker 376 Oklahoma's School Endowment D. W. P. 381 Judge Charles Bismark Ames D. A. Richardson 391 Augusta Robertson Moore: A Sketch of Her Life and Times Carolyn Thomas Foreman 399 Chief John Ross John Bartlett Meserve 421 Captain David L. Payne D. W. P. 438 Oklahoma's First Court Grant Foreman 457 An Unusual Antiquity in Pontotoc County H. R. Antle 470 Oklahoma History Quilt D. W. P. 472 Some Fragments of Oklahoma History 481 Notes 485 Minutes 489 Necrology 494 A FIVE MINUTE HISTORY OF OKLAHOMA By Patrick J. Hurley, former Secretary of War. From a Radio Address Delivered November 14, 1935. Page 373 The State of Oklahoma was admitted to the Union 28 years ago. Spaniards led by Coronado traversed what is now the State of Oklahoma 67 years before the first English settlement in Virginia and 79 years before the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock. All of the land now in Oklahoma except a little strip known as the panhandle was acquired by the United States from France in the Louisiana Purchase. Early in the nineteenth century the United States moved the five civilized tribes, the Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws, and Seminoles, from southeastern states to lands west of the Mississippi River, the title to which was transferred to the tribes in exchange for part of their lands in the East.
    [Show full text]
  • Along the Ohio Trail
    Along The Ohio Trail A Short History of Ohio Lands Dear Ohioan, Meet Simon, your trail guide through Ohio’s history! As the 17th state in the Union, Ohio has a unique history that I hope you will find interesting and worth exploring. As you read Along the Ohio Trail, you will learn about Ohio’s geography, what the first Ohioan’s were like, how Ohio was discovered, and other fun facts that made Ohio the place you call home. Enjoy the adventure in learning more about our great state! Sincerely, Keith Faber Ohio Auditor of State Along the Ohio Trail Table of Contents page Ohio Geography . .1 Prehistoric Ohio . .8 Native Americans, Explorers, and Traders . .17 Ohio Land Claims 1770-1785 . .27 The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 . .37 Settling the Ohio Lands 1787-1800 . .42 Ohio Statehood 1800-1812 . .61 Ohio and the Nation 1800-1900 . .73 Ohio’s Lands Today . .81 The Origin of Ohio’s County Names . .82 Bibliography . .85 Glossary . .86 Additional Reading . .88 Did you know that Ohio is Hi! I’m Simon and almost the same distance I’ll be your trail across as it is up and down guide as we learn (about 200 miles)? Our about the land we call Ohio. state is shaped in an unusual way. Some people think it looks like a flag waving in the wind. Others say it looks like a heart. The shape is mostly caused by the Ohio River on the east and south and Lake Erie in the north. It is the 35th largest state in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Demographic Compositions of U.S. Circuit and District Courts
    GETTY STEELE IMAGES/KIM Examining the Demographic Compositions of U.S. Circuit and District Courts By Democracy and Government Reform Team February 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Examining the Demographic Compositions of U.S. Circuit and District Courts By Democracy and Government Reform Team February 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 7 The demographic compositions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals 10 1st Circuit 23 8th Circuit 12 2nd Circuit 25 9th Circuit 14 3rd Circuit 27 10th Circuit 16 4th Circuit 29 11th Circuit 18 5th Circuit 31 D.C. Circuit 20 6th Circuit 32 Federal Circuit 22 7th Circuit 33 The demographic compositions of the U.S. District Courts 36 District courts housed 66 District courts housed within the 1st Circuit within the 7th Circuit 39 District courts housed 71 District courts housed within the 2nd Circuit within the 8th Circuit 44 District courts housed 76 District courts housed within the 3rd Circuit within the 9th Circuit 48 District courts housed 86 District courts housed within the 4th Circuit within the 10th Circuit 54 District courts housed 91 District courts housed within the 5th Circuit within the 11th Circuit 60 District courts housed 97 District court housed within the 6th Circuit within the D.C. Circuit 110 Conclusion 111 Endnotes Introduction and summary Authors’ note: This report reflects data as of November 18, 2019. Its main goal is to provide advocates and policymakers with an accessible resource demonstrating general trends pertaining to the lack of demographic diversity across all of the lower federal courts. Some individual data points may have altered slightly between November and publication and are not reflected within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 35 No. 1 the Seal of Cimarron Territory by the Editor
    Vol. 35 No. 1 The Seal of Cimarron Territory by the Editor ------------------------------------------ 2 History of No-Man’s Land by Morris L. Wardell ------------------------------------- 11 Shade’s Well by Laura V. Hammer ------------------------------------------------------ 34 Memoirs of Oklahoma by Kittie M. Harvey ------------------------------------------- 41 Judge Albert C. Hunt by Judge N.B. Johnson ------------------------------------------- 53 The Butterfield Overland Mail One Hundred Years Ago By Muriel H. Wright --------------------------------------------------------------- 55 Dr. and Mrs. Richard Moore Crain by Carolyn Thomas Foreman ------------------- 72 Health Conditions in Indian Territory, 1830 to Civil War By Bernice Norman Crockett ---------------------------------------------------- 80 Notes and Documents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 91 Book Reviews ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 110 Minutes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 118 THE SEAL OF CIMARRON TERRITORY The original Seal of Cimarron Territory, reproduced1 on the front cover of this number of The Chronicles was lost more than fifty years ago, leaving its existence only a tradition in Oklahoma history: The last paper bearing an impression of the Seal, a perfect impress on gold leaf, is in the margin of a letter written under the heading, ' ' Off ice of Dyke Ballinger, County Attorney, Beaver, Oklahoma, ? ' as follows
    [Show full text]
  • People of the Three Fires: the Ottawa, Potawatomi, and Ojibway of Michigan.[Workbook and Teacher's Guide]
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 321 956 RC 017 685 AUTHOR Clifton, James A.; And Other., TITLE People of the Three Fires: The Ottawa, Potawatomi, and Ojibway of Michigan. Workbook and Teacher's Guide . INSTITUTION Grand Rapids Inter-Tribal Council, MI. SPONS AGENCY Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.; Dyer-Ives Foundation, Grand Rapids, MI.; Michigan Council for the Humanities, East Lansing.; National Endowment for the Humanities (NFAH), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO ISBN-0-9617707-0-8 PUB DATE 86 NOTE 225p.; Some photographs may not reproduce ;4011. AVAILABLE FROMMichigan Indian Press, 45 Lexington N. W., Grand Rapids, MI 49504. PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Guides - Classroom Use - Guides '.For Teachers) (052) -- Guides - Classroom Use- Materials (For Learner) (051) EDRS PRICE MFU1 /PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *American Indian Culture; *American Indian History; American Indians; *American Indian Studies; Environmental Influences; Federal Indian Relationship; Political Influences; Secondary Education; *Sociix- Change; Sociocultural Patterns; Socioeconomic Influences IDENTIFIERS Chippewa (Tribe); *Michigan; Ojibway (Tribe); Ottawa (Tribe); Potawatomi (Tribe) ABSTRACT This book accompanied by a student workbook and teacher's guide, was written to help secondary school students to explore the history, culture, and dynamics of Michigan's indigenous peoples, the American Indians. Three chapters on the Ottawa, Potawatomi, and Ojibway (or Chippewa) peoples follow an introduction on the prehistoric roots of Michigan Indians. Each chapter reflects the integration
    [Show full text]
  • Of Tribal Courts and "Territories" Is Full Faith and Credit Required?
    California Western Law Review Volume 23 Number 2 Article 4 1987 Of Tribal Courts and "Territories" Is Full Faith and Credit Required? William V. Vetter Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr Recommended Citation Vetter, William V. (1987) "Of Tribal Courts and "Territories" Is Full Faith and Credit Required?," California Western Law Review: Vol. 23 : No. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr/vol23/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CWSL Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Western Law Review by an authorized editor of CWSL Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vetter: Of Tribal Courts and "Territories" Is Full Faith and Credit Requi Of Tribal Courts and "Territories" Is Full Faith and Credit Required? WILLIAM V. VETTER* In the last fifteen to twenty years, Indian tribal governments have become increasingly active, expanding both the nature and amount of their concerns and efforts. The number and variety of cases being heard in tribal courts are also increasing. A number of those courts are hearing cases which involve persons who are not members of the reservation tribe. Unless tribal court judgments can be enforced outside of the reservation, judgments against non- members may be useless. Article IV, section one of the United States Constitution re- quires that every state give "Full Faith and Credit" to the public acts, records and judicial proceedings of other states. Acts of Con- gress implementing that provision have extended its requirements and benefits to other governments associated with the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Michigan History 1618-1701
    CHRONOLOGY OF MICHIGAN HISTORY 1618-1701 1618 Etienne Brulé passes through North Channel at the neck of Lake Huron; that same year (or during two following years) he lands at Sault Ste. Marie, probably the first European to look upon the Sault. The Michigan Native American population is approximately 15,000. 1621 Brulé returns, explores the Lake Superior coast, and notes copper deposits. 1634 Jean Nicolet passes through the Straits of Mackinac and travels along Lake Michigan’s northern shore, seeking a route to the Orient. 1641 Fathers Isaac Jogues and Charles Raymbault conduct religious services at the Sault. 1660 Father René Mesnard establishes the first regular mission, held throughout winter at Keweenaw Bay. 1668 Father Jacques Marquette takes over the Sault mission and founds the first permanent settlement on Michigan soil at Sault Ste. Marie. 1669 Louis Jolliet is guided east by way of the Detroit River, Lake Erie, and Lake Ontario. 1671 Simon François, Sieur de St. Lusson, lands at the Sault, claims vast Great Lakes region, comprising most of western America, for Louis XIV. St. Ignace is founded when Father Marquette builds a mission chapel. First of the military outposts, Fort de Buade (later known as Fort Michilimackinac), is established at St. Ignace. 1673 Jolliet and Marquette travel down the Mississippi River. 1675 Father Marquette dies at Ludington. 1679 The Griffon, the first sailing vessel on the Great Lakes, is built by René Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, and lost in a storm on Lake Michigan. ➤ La Salle erects Fort Miami at the mouth of the St.
    [Show full text]