DOCSLIB.ORG

Airtightness of Buildings — Towards Higher Performance Final Report — Domestic Sector Airtightness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Airtightness of Buildings — Towards Higher Performance Final Report — Domestic Sector Airtightness Airtightness of buildings — towards higher performance Final Report — Domestic Sector Airtightness Airtightness of buildings — towards higher performance Final Report — Domestic Sector Airtightness Dr David Johnston, Dominic Miles-Shenton, Prof. Malcolm Bell, Dr Jez Wingfield, Centre for the Built Environment, Leeds Metropolitan University Department for Communities and Local Government This research was commissioned by the previous government. The views and analysis expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department for Communities and Local Government. This document is being published in the interests of transparency. Department for Communities and Local Government Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone: 030 3444 0000 Website: www.communities.gov.uk © Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2011 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. If you require this publication in an alternative format please email [email protected] DCLG Publications Tel: 030 0123 1124 Fax: 030 0123 1125 Email: [email protected] Online via the website: www.communities.gov.uk ISBN: 978 1 4098 2863 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...................................................................................................................................... 4 Airtightness design and construction........................................................................................................ 4 Implementation of pressure testing........................................................................................................... 5 Logistics of pressure testing ..................................................................................................................... 6 Options for regulatory testing.................................................................................................................... 7 Further work.............................................................................................................................................. 8 Introduction................................................................................................................................................... 9 Structure of the Report ................................................................................................................................. 9 Literature Review.......................................................................................................................................... 9 Participatory Action Research — Phase 1 ................................................................................................. 10 Selection of developers, sites and house types ..................................................................................... 10 Design assessments and site surveys.................................................................................................... 11 Airtightness results.................................................................................................................................. 12 Participatory Action Research — Phase 2 ................................................................................................. 16 Participatory Action Research — Phase 3 ................................................................................................. 17 Selection of house types......................................................................................................................... 17 Design assessments and site surveys.................................................................................................... 17 Measures adopted to improve airtightness............................................................................................. 18 Airtightness results.................................................................................................................................. 18 Discussion Papers...................................................................................................................................... 23 Discussion paper 1 — Performance and implementation ...................................................................... 23 Discussion paper 2 — Impacts of pressure testing ................................................................................ 24 Suggestions for Further Work .................................................................................................................... 27 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................ 27 Pressurisation test results....................................................................................................................... 27 Constructing dwellings to be airtight....................................................................................................... 28 The existing testing regime and the logistics of compulsory pressure testing........................................ 29 References ................................................................................................................................................. 32 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... 33 List of Appendices ...................................................................................................................................... 34 Executive Summary 1 This report constitutes milestone D11 — Final Report — Domestic Sector Airtightness of the Communities and Local Government/ODPM Project reference CI 61/6/16 (BD2429) Airtightness of Buildings — Towards Higher Performance (Borland and Bell, 2003). This report presents the overall conclusions and key messages obtained from the project through design assessments, construction observations, discussions with developers and pressurisation test results. It also summarises discussion on the airtight performance of current UK housing, the implementation and impact of current and future legislation, and identifies potential areas for future work. 2 Following an initial literature review, the project adopted an action research methodology that involved the research team working very closely with five developers to investigate the practical design and construction issues that arise in making improvements to the airtightness of speculatively built mainstream housing. Two construction types were represented in the project: masonry cavity and steel frame. The action research was carried out in three phases. Phase 1 sought to track in detail the design and construction of 25 dwellings (five per developer) built to the regulatory requirements of the 2002 revision to Part L of the Building Regulations and then to measure air leakage in the completed dwellings. During this phase no attempts were made to influence the nature of the design or construction. Phase 2 involved extensive feedback to each developer on the results of Phase 1, including the analysis of detailed design drawings and observations of dwelling construction. This was used to improve the understanding of the airtightness issues and to prompt the developers into making improvements to the processes they were adopting. The feedback phase was followed by a further construction phase (Phase 3) in which the design and construction of 25 dwellings were observed and detailed feedback provided to each developer at every opportunity. Upon completion of the second cohort of dwellings airtightness was measured and the results compared with the first phase results. The data were then used to assess the impact of the different methods adopted and the implications for future regulatory policy. Airtightness design and construction 3 The key conclusions that have emerged from the pressurisation test results obtained during the course of this project are as follows: a) Although the size, structure and non-random nature of the samples preclude it being taken as fully representative of UK house production, the results obtained from Phase 1 suggest that the dwellings tested were broadly in line with the existing data on the stock as a whole and that, at least in these cases, the impact of the 2002 edition of Approved Document Part L1 on airtightness has been minimal. b) Given the qualitative nature of the project, it was not possible to extrapolate the Phase 1 results to the post 2002 new build stock with any degree of confidence. However, the results were broadly in line with the results from pressurisation tests on 99 post 2002 dwellings (also not a random sample) reported by Grigg (2004). The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Investigation of the Impact of Commercial Building Envelope Airtightness on HVAC Energy Use
    NISTIR 7238 Investigation of the Impact of Commercial Building Envelope Airtightness on HVAC Energy Use Steven J. Emmerich Tim McDowell Wagdy Anis NISTIR 7238 Investigation of the Impact of Commercial Building Envelope Airtightness on HVAC Energy Use Steven J. Emmerich Building and Fire Research Laboratory Timothy P. McDowell TESS, Inc. Wagdy Anis Shepley Bulfinch Richardson and Abbott Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Building Technologies June 2005 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary Technology Administration Phillip J. Bond, Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology Hratch Semerjian, Acting Director ABSTRACT This report presents a simulation study of the energy impact of improving envelope airtightness in U.S. commercial buildings. Despite common assumptions, measurements have shown that typical U.S. commercial buildings are not particularly airtight. Past simulation studies have shown that commercial building envelope leakage can result in significant heating and cooling loads. To evaluate the potential energy savings of an effective air barrier requirement, annual energy simulations were prepared for three nonresidential buildings (a two-story office building, a one-story retail building, and a four-story apartment building) in 5 U.S. cities. A coupled multizone airflow and building energy simulation tool was used to predict the energy use for the buildings at a target tightness level relative to a baseline level based on measurements in existing buildings. Based on assumed blended national average heating and cooling energy prices, predicted potential annual heating and cooling energy cost savings ranged from 3 % to 36 % with the smallest savings occurring in the cooling-dominated climates of Phoenix and Miami.
    [Show full text]
  • Airbase 6142... [1248Kb]
    House Airtightness Variation with Age M.R. Bassett Building Physicist, Building Research Association of New Zealand Total number of pages( excluding cover page)= 5 Full address/phone/fax Building Research Association of New Zealand Private Bag 50908, Porirua, New Zealand Ph (04)235-7600 Fax (04)235-6070 SUMMARY - This paper focuses on changes to the air tightness of houses in the first year after construction. Monthly blower door results for 7 houses are presented and the seasonal and longer term effects compared with equivalent measurements in a variety of overseas climates. The picture that emerges is of small airtightness changes in stable coastal climates and larger seasonal swings where the summer to winter temperature differences are more extreme. There are some exceptions in the New Zealand data, however, that could be attributed to water leaks in the roofs of two houses .. 1. AIR INFILTRATION AND HOUSE VENTILATION if they exist, or used in comparisons of buildings of different types, age or location around the world. The airtightness of housing has been studied because background air leakage can contribute to ventilation, and hence to building energy efficiency and indoor air quality. There have been considerable changes in building materials and construction methods over the years, and the background ventilation provided by air infiltration has been shown by Bassett (1992) to have generally declined. This has provided the motivation to design and build ventilation systems that more accurately cater for energy efficiency and indoor air quality. There are no targets for house airtightness in NZ building codes, and yet when windows are kept closed for security or soundisolationreasons, air infiltration will be the sole provider of ventilation.
    [Show full text]
  • What Impacts Does Increasing Airtightness Have on Mould, Condensation and Measures of Indoor Air Quality?
    “What impacts does increasing airtightness have on mould, condensation and measures of indoor air quality?” Rapid Review Report V 2.0 Authors Leela Kempton, Daniel Daly, Mark Dewsbury Sustainable Buildings Research Centre, University of Wollongong [email protected] [email protected] Title What impacts does increasing airtightness have on mould, condensation and measures of indoor air quality? ISBN Date September 2020 Keywords Airtightness, Ventilation, Indoor air quality, mould, moisture, condensation Publisher CRC LCL Preferred citation Kempton, L, Daly, D, Dewsbury, M (2020), Rapid Review: What impacts does increasing airtightness have on mould, condensation and measures of indoor air quality? CRC Low Carbon Living, Sydney. Rapid Review - Airtightness 2 Acknowledgements This research is funded by the CRC for Low Carbon Living Ltd supported by the Cooperative Research Centres program, an Australian Government initiative Disclaimer Any opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the CRCLCL or its partners, agents or employees. The CRCLCL gives no warranty or assurance and makes no representation as to the accuracy or reliability of any information or advice contained in this document, or that it is suitable for any intended use. The CRCLCL, its partners, agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability for any errors or omissions or in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of this document. Peer review statement The CRCLCL recognises the value of knowledge exchange and the importance of objective peer review.
    [Show full text]
  • Blower Door Testing Results Speak for Themselves, and We™Re Blown Away!
    Blower Door Testing Results Speak for Themselves, and We’re Blown Away! A Call for Innovation Once a city owned parking lot, the apartment complex spreads across six floors, with an average of five windows for each of the building’s 105 apartments. Sound familiar? We’re referring to the Eagles Landing DensElement® Barrier System case study in Burlington, Vermont. The one with just under 600 windows—That’s the one! Well, we decided to check in with the building envelope consultant, Zero by Degrees at the time, now known as BVH Integrated Services, upon the completion of the project to get the scoop on the performance of the DensElement® Barrier System. Mike LaCrosse, project manager, at BVH Integrated Services, provided his feedback. He said, “I was impressed with the DensElement® Barrier System, and admittedly, my experience with the system is limited, but it seems to be a respectable product, especially in comparison against a self-adhered membrane installation.” LaCrosse added, “Due to the nature of the PROSOCO material, the entire system is what I would call a highly “inspectable” system. Meaning you can visually inspect the system and identify air leakage pathways with relative ease, even without testing it, although we prefer qualitative testing regardless. The same can be true of self-adhered membrane systems, but leakage path ways are often a bit more nuanced. With the PROSOCO, there is either a hole that leaks, or there isn’t.” Between visual inspections and qualitative testing of the DensElement® Barrier System throughout construction, LaCrosse felt confident in the building’s air tightness performance.
    [Show full text]
  • New Buildings and Major Renovations Version 3.2 December 2019 Includes Updated Section: Energy and Atmosphere
    New Buildings and Major Renovations Version 3.2 December 2019 Includes Updated Section: Energy and Atmosphere Center for Sustainable Building Research College of Design · University of Minnesota All rights reserved. © Regents of the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus, College of Design. All rights reserved. 2019 1 © Regents of the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus, College of Design. All rights reserved. 2019 2 Print Version Contents Print Version Contents ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3 B3 Guideline Version History ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Guidelines Organization ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Applicability ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Process ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Performance Management Guidelines ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Air Leakage of Residential Buildings in Mixed and Cold Climates
    Effects of Air Leakage of Residential Buildings in Mixed and Cold Climates Florian Antretter Achilles Karagiozis, PhD Anton TenWolde Andreas Holm, PhD Member ASHRAE Member ASHRAE Member ASHRAE ABSTRACT This paper deals with the effects of air leakage in residential buildings and provides an overview of the influence of air leakage on the measured performance of the interior temperature and relative humidity in two very different US climate zones (IECC zone 4, Knoxville) and (IECC zone 6, Madison). The air leakage of residential buildings depends on a number of factors like building age, volume or the climate zone, as it is a common assumption that in colder climate zones more importance is attached to airtight buildings than in warmer climates. To quantify these differences and to show the dependence of air leakage on various influences an investigation in occupied build- ings has been carried out. The air tightness of a number of homes in the mixed climate of eastern Tennessee and in the cold climate of south-central Wisconsin was measured on a seasonal basis. The interior conditions were monitored for each of the homes to investigate the link to the respective air leakage of the buildings. The results show that an estimation of the air leakage of residential buildings can be made with knowledge of some simple boundary conditions. Seasonal changes do not have a significant influence on the air leakgage. This information is critical for developing reasonable boundary conditions for hygrothermal models. INTRODUCTION or removal by the HVAC systems and the moisture flux caused Heat, air and moisture transport is a complex phenome- by operation of the ventilation equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Blower Door Brochure
    BUILDING PERFORMANCE TESTING TOOLS ® Minneapolis Blower Door™ • Measure airtightness level of building envelopes • Diagnose air leakage problems • Estimate natural infiltration rates • Estimate efficiency losses from building air leakage • Code compliance For 30 years, the Minneapolis Blower Door™ has been the system of choice for utility programs, energy raters, HVAC contractors, builders, insulation contractors and weatherization professionals. © 2013 The Energy Conservatory ™ Anatomy of the Minneapolis Blower Door 1 1 Lightweight, durable door frame and panel 2 • Snap-together aluminum frame with compact case. • Sets up in seconds and fits an 8-foot door without special parts. 2 • Precision cam lever mechanism securely clamps the nylon panel into the door opening. 2 DG-700 pressure and flow gauge 3 • Most accurate Digital Pressure Gauge on the market to meet all airtightness testing standards for residential and commercial buildings. • Two precision sensors provide simultaneous display of 3 building pressure and fan flow. Stable auto-zero to eliminate sensitivity to orientation and temperature. • Specialized @50 and @25 test modes make it simple to conduct one-point airtightness tests. • Four separate time-averaging modes accurately measure fluctuating pressures (1, 5, 10 second & long-term). • “Baseline” feature lets you measure and record a 4 baseline pressure reading and then display the 5 baseline-adjusted reading. • USB, serial or WiFi Link for computer connection. 3 Fan-cooled, solid-state digital speed controller • State of the art precision control of fan speed. • Compatible with Cruise Control feature and automated testing. 4 Powerful and reliable calibrated fan 5 Automated Testing • Powerful 3/4 hp motor. Automated testing with your computer automatically • Comes with rings A and B to measure down to 300 CFM.
    [Show full text]
  • Condensation Risk Due to Variations in Airtightness and Thermal Insulation of an Office Building in Warm and Wet Climate
    Condensation Risk Due to Variations in Airtightness and Thermal Insulation of an Office Building in Warm and Wet Climate Authors: Wanghee Cho, Shizuo Iwamoto, Shinsuke Kato Date Submitted: 2019-01-31 Keywords: warm and wet climate, office building, airtightness, thermal insulation, microbial growth, condensation risk (CR) Abstract: Condensation in a building encourages microbial growth, which can have an adverse effect on the health of occupants. Furthermore, it induces the deterioration of the building. To prevent problems caused by condensation, from the design step of a building, predictions of the spatial, temporal and causation for condensation occurrences are necessary. By using TRNSYS simulation coupled with TRNFLOW, condensation assessment of an entire office building in Tokyo, Japan, was conducted throughout the year, including when the air-conditioning system was not operated, by considering the absorption-desorption properties of the building materials and papers in the office and the airflow within the entire building. It was found that most of the condensation occurred during winter and was observed mainly in the non-air-conditioned core parts, especially the topmost floor. Additional analyses, which identified the effect of variations in the thermal insulation of the external walls, roof and windows and the airtightness of the windows on condensation, showed that the lower airtightness of windows resulted in decreased condensation risks, and condensation within the building was suppressed completely when the thermal insulation
    [Show full text]
  • Large Building Airtightness: Where We're at and Where We're Going
    Impact of Large Building Airtightness Requirements Buildings XIII Conference December 6th, 2016 Lorne Ricketts | MASc, P.Eng. 1 Outline Intro to Requirements Measured Performance Industry Impact What it Is, and What it Isn’t Airtightness vs Air Leakage 2 Why We Care Infiltration and Exfiltration Affect: Building Energy Consumption – Heat Loss and Gains ($) Indoor Air Quality - Pollutants Building Durability - Condensation Occupant Comfort - Thermal & Acoustics 3 Many Air Barrier Systems Available Loose Sheet Applied Sealed Gypsum Sheathing Liquid Applied Mass Walls Membrane – Taped Joints – Sealant Filler at Joints Sealants/Membranes (concrete) & StrappingBUT, IT’S THE DETAILS THAT MATTER Self-Adhered vapor Self-Adhered vapor Sprayfoam Curtainwall, window-wall impermeable membrane permeable membrane & glazing systems 4 BRAND House Wrap BRAND Materials Components Accessories Whole Building Airtightness 5 Standards & Qualifications Washington State & Seattle, ABAA Target, GSA, IBC/IECC Option < 2.0 L/(s·m²) [0.40 cfm/ft²] @ 75 Pa US Army Corps of Engineers & IGCC < 1.26 L/(s·m²) [0.25 cfm/ft²] at 75 Pa Passive House 0.6 ACH50 (~0.60 L/(s·m²) [0.12 cfm/ft²] at 75 Pa) LEED, 6-sided apartment test (~1.25 L/(s·m²) [0.25 cfm/ft²] at 50 Pa) UK (AATMA) Large Buildings ~0.70 to 1.75 L/(s·m²) at 75 Pa [~0.14 to 0.34 cfm/ft² at 75 Pa] 6 Measured Performance 7 Where We’re At – The Numbers Airtightness testing data was compiled in a database from the following sources: Published literature Industry members Unpublished data provided
    [Show full text]
  • Air Leakage Control in Large Res. Buildings
    Development Air Leakage of Testing Control and Measurement in Multi ‐ Unit Strategies Residential to Quantify Air Buildings Leakage CLIENT Silvio Plescia in Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation MURBS 700 Montreal Road Ottawa ON K1A 0P7 SUBMITTED BY RDH Building Engineering Ltd. 224 West 8th Avenue Vancouver BC V5Y 1N5 PROJECT # 5314.00 DATE April 2, 2013 R:\5314 ‐ CMHC Air Leakage Control in MURBs\Report\CMHC Air Leakage Control in MURBs ‐ Research Report Final.docx Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................... 1 RÉSUMÉ ................................................................................ 3 1. Project Overview ........................................................... 5 1.1. Background ........................................................ 5 1.2. Scope .................................................................. 5 2. Airflow in Multi‐Unit Residential Buildings ................... 6 2.2. Driving Forces ..................................................... 7 2.2.1 Wind ..................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Stack Effect ......................................................... 10 2.2.3 Mechanical Systems ........................................... 13 2.3. Cumulative Effect of Driving Forces ................. 15 2.4. Control of Airflow in MURBs ............................ 16 2.4.1 Exterior Enclosure Air Barrier Systems ............... 16 2.4.2 Occupant Behaviour ........................................... 28 2.4.3 Compartmentalization
    [Show full text]
  • Airtightness of a Building Envelope
    Marina Paramonova AIRTIGHTNESS OF A BUILDING ENVELOPE Bachelor’s thesis Degree Programme in Building Services Engineering 2019 Author (authors) Degree Time Marina Paramonova Bachelor of Building December 2019 Service Engineering Title 45 pages Airtightness of a building envelope 10 pages of appendices Supervisor Anna Forsström Abstract The main investigation object of this paper if the airtightness of a building envelope and its influence of energy efficiency, indoor air quality and thermal conditions inside the building. First of all, the legislation regulations for the airtightness of buildings and the measuring methods were discovered. Secondly, the airtightness measurement took place at the end of the construction process in the daycare center in a city in Finland. When the building was commissioned, the indoor climate parameters were monitored to discover the influence of the airtightness of the building envelope and air leakages on indoor air quality and thermal comfort of occupants. Finally, the results were analyzed. It was found out that the building envelope has high airtightness. It was discovered that there is no significant influence on thermal conditions inside the building. The temperature and relative humidity did not fluctuate much. However, it was discovered that the low air leakage rate leads to a reduction of fresh air income inside the building, which leads to the increase of indoor air pollutants and the decrease in indoor air quality. That means that the ventilation system should be adjusted if the predicted number of occupants increases. The study showed that the improvement of airtightness leads to a reduction of the energy demand of the building.
    [Show full text]
  • Ensuring Good Indoor Air Quality in Buildings Ensuring Good Indoor Air Quality in Buildings 3
    www.bregroup.com Ensuring good indoor air quality in buildings Vina Kukadia and Stuart Upton March 2019 BRE Trust Bucknalls Lane Watford BRE Trust Herts The BRE Trust uses profits made by BRE Group to fund WD25 9XX new research and education programmes, that will help T: +44 (0)333 321 8811 it meet its goal of ‘Building a better world together’. E: [email protected] The BRE Trust is a registered charity in England & Wales: www.bregroup.com No. 1092193, and Scotland: No. SC039320. PEN © BRE 03 19 March 2019 2 Ensuring good indoor air quality in buildings Ensuring good indoor air quality in buildings 3 Buildings in urban areas are exposed to pollutants from outdoor Introduction sources, such as road traffic, boiler flues and other combustion plants, industrial processes and construction activities – so good According to the latest UN data, 54.5% of the world’s ventilation is essential. In the past ventilation has depended on population was living in urban settlements in 2016, with air permeability through cracks and gaps in the building fabric, 23%, or 1.7 billion, living in cities with at least a million combined with air bricks, windows and mechanical ventilation. inhabitants. That percentage is estimated to rise to 60% This does not necessarily improve indoor air quality and can result by 2030. In the same period the number of cities with 10 in excessive energy consumption. The modern approach is to ‘build million inhabitants is expected to rise from 31 to 41. With tight, ventilate right’. This means making buildings airtight and the growth in urbanisation comes the risk of increased air installing ventilation systems that reduce the ingress of outdoor Table of contents pollutants, while preventing the build up of indoor pollutants.
    [Show full text]