DOCSLIB.ORG

Sewage — a Future Waste Problem?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sewage — a Future Waste Problem? Indicator Fact Sheet Signals 2001– Chapter Waste Sewage sludge - a future waste problem? (W5.1) Sludge from waste water treatment, 1992-1998 and expectations for 2000 and 2005 45,0 40,0 35,0 30,0 25,0 20,0 Kg perKg capita 15,0 10,0 5,0 0,0 l in e tria ds c ay land uga land us ran in Spa ort Ire F Sweden A F Greece Norw Denmark Germany P Belgium Luxembourg Netherlan United Kingdom 1992 1995 1998 2000 2005 (W5.1) Sludge from waste water treatment 1992 to 1998 and forecast for 2000 and 2005. Member States sorted by the level of generation in 1995. Sources: Report from the Commission: Implementation of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment, as amended by Commission Directive 98/15/EC of 27 February 1998. 15 January 1999. Information from ETC/W survey May 2000 1 (W5.2) Treatment of sewage sludge, selected EEA member countries, 1998 45,0 40,0 35,0 30,0 25,0 Kg per20,0 capita 15,0 10,0 5,0 0,0 Denmark Germany : Ã7UHDWPHQWÃRIÃVHZDJHÃVOXGJHÃVHOHFWHGÃ(($ÃPHPEHUÃFRXQWULHVÃÃLuxembourg à 6RXUFHÃ(7&:ÃVXUYH\Ã0D\ÃÃDQGÃLQIRUPDWLRQÃIURPà November 1998, following directive 86/278/EEC on sewage sludgeFinland à (W5.3) Contamination of sewage sludge, selected EEA member countries 1995 to 1997 Portugal Mercury Austria Total landfilling 2,5 Netherlands 2,0 1,5 1,0 Norway 0,5 Total recycling Mg 0,0per kg Phosfor United Kingdom report from Member States to the Commission concerning sewage sludge treatment, Germany Total incineration Spain Denmark France France Ireland Finland Belgium Greece Greece 1995 Ireland 1996 Luxembourg 1997 Norway Sweden UK 2 Cadmium 3,0 2,5 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 Mg per kg phosfor kg per Mg y e n c d d n n n UK la la ourg den rma ra n re b e F Fi Greece I Norway we G Denmark S Luxem 1995 1996 1997 Lead 200 150 100 50 0 Mg per kg phosfor nd UK la way reland r France Fin Greece I Germany Denmark embourg No Sweden ux L 1995 1996 1997 NOTE: VERTICAL AXIS TITLES – milligrams per kg dry matter Note: Average content reported by member countries. Commission in Council Directive 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 on use of sludge in agriculture maximum content: Cadmium 20 mg/kg and Mercury 16mg/kg dry matter. à 6RXUFHÃreport from Member States to the Commission concerning sewage sludge treatment, November 1998, following directive 86/278/EEC on sewage sludge and ETC-W survey May 2000. à K The increase in the total generation of sewadge sludge is the side effect of an environmentally positive development in treating waste water. Despite the expected increase in recycling, the total amount of sludge for disposal is expected to increase. à à à Results and assessment Relevance of the indicator for describing developments in the environment Sludge can be a valuable fertiliser for agriculture. It is a good source of phosphorus and its nitrogen content can also be valuable, especially for crops with a long growing season (ISWA 1998). The organic content of the sludge can help improve the soil structure. In general, sludge stimulates beneficial biological activity in the soil (DEPA, 1997). The percentage of nutrients in sludge will 3 increase with more effective cleaning of waste water. Phosphorus being a limited resource makes recycling of sludge for agricultural purposes an appealing solution for sustainable management of sludge. However, sludge is also contaminated with heavy metals, bacteria and viruses and a number of organic substances, and both EU and national regulations set limits for contaminant concentrations in order to protect the soil and humans from pollution. Landfilling of sludge has hitherto been an inexpensive means of disposal, but both national restrictions and the proposed Landfill Directive will make landfilling more expensive. Several countries have introduced general restrictions on the landfilling of organic waste. Incineration reduces the sludge to ash, which can then be landfilled. In most cases supplementary fuel is needed in order to burn the sludge and there is usually no net gain of energy (Johnke, 1998). à Policy relevance and policy references Many new treatment plants are due for completion by 2005 and the amount of sewage sludge is expected to increase by 50 % as a result of more stringent demands for water treatment in the Council Directive concerning urban waste water treatment (91/171/EEC). However the European Commission is considering more rigid limit values for heavy metals and possibly limit values for some organic compounds, and this will limit the potential for recycling. This could be through an amendment to Directive 86/278/EEC on sewage sludge. Several Member countries have already established more stringent limit values for heavy metals and some have also introduced limit values for a number of organic pollutants. The economic consequences of a restricted agricultural application of sewage sludge are considerable. Depending on the alternative chosen, the cost may rise from 75 EURO per tonne for agricultural use to 400 EURO for incineration in some countries (ISWA, 1998). One German source even indicates prices up to 600 EURO per tonne for thermal treatment (Johnke, 1998). Thus, phasing out the use of the problematic compounds may be an economically sound solution. Assessment The total amount of sludge produced in the 15 EU Member States is predicted to increase from 6.6 million tonnes of dry matter in 1992 to least 9.4 million tonnes in 2005. Differences in generation of sludge per capita between Member countries are due to different degrees of waste water cleaning. The difference between the highest and the lowest is 30 kg per capita. Assuming that the content of dry matter is approximately the same in all Member countries, there is a need for further waste water treatment in some countries. Even if this is done, this will not raise the EU average to that of the most active countries within the next five years. This means that there will still be a need for further investment in the waste water treatment and the problems of proper treatment of sewage sludge will still be increasing after 2005. The Commission expects the proportion of sludge used for agriculture and soil conditioning to have increased by 73 % by 2005, to 53 % of the total produced. The proportion incinerated is predicted to increase to 25 % of the total produced and the amount sent to landfill to decease by 33 % from 1992 to 2005. 4 Due to more stringent demands for water treatment in the Council Directive concerning urban waste water treatment (91/171/EEC), many new treatment plants are due for completion by 2005 and the amount of sewage sludge is expected to increase by 50 %. For some countries, the quantity will increase by nearly 300 %. The expected increase is itself a challenge for waste management and the choices of treatment and disposal methods will have large economic and environmental implications. Landfill is expected to fall by 24 % while incineration will increase by about 300 %. Incineration reduces the sludge to ash that requires less landfill capacity. However, an increase in recycling of 75 % will secure that the overall recycling percentage for sludge will increase to more than 50 %. Recycling of sewage sludge mainly means spreading on soil as fertiliser for agriculture or forestry. Growing attention to producing clean and non-contaminated food for human consumption will probably raise debate on this treatment of sludge. On the one hand recycling programmes are encouraged by public opinion; on the other hand the demand for clean and healthy food is growing. The results of surveys in Member countries on contamination of sewage sludge show a development in the right direction: less use of heavy metals lead to less contaminated sludge and thereby to more recycling. However, the increased use of sewage sludge as fertiliser needs to be balanced so that the contamination of agricultural land will neither affect the quality of food nor lead to damage of the environment. A recent positive sign is the fall in the content of heavy metals combined with a higher content of nitrogen and phosphorus due to more efficient waste water cleaning, which has been observed in Denmark, Germany, France and Finland. 5 Data Destination of sludge from treatment plants and forecasts of the destination (in thousands of 1 tonnes of dry matter per year) Disposal B DK D GR E F IRL L NL A P FIN S UK Total Surface Water - - - - 38 - 14 - - - - - : 282 334 1992 Recycling. 17 110 1.018 1 275 402 4 5 134 63 38 87 : 472 2.626 Landfill 34 25 846 65 180 131 16 4 177 58 75 63 : 130 1.804 Incineration – 40 274 - 35 110 – - 12 66 – - : 90 627 Not Specified 8 - 70 - - - 3 - 1 3 13 - : 24 122 Total 59 175 2.208 66 528 643 37 9 324 190 126 150 243 998 5.756 Surface Water - - - - 54 - 15 - - - - - - 267 336 1995 Recycling. 22 120 1.151 1 390 489 7 7 95 63 44 86 120 648 3.243 Landfill 39 25 857 65 257 114 14 3 192 58 88 72 106 114 2004 Incineration – 40 411 - 50 161 – - 56 66 – - - 110 894 Not Specified 17 - 93 - - - 4 - 23 3 15 - 11 19 185 Total 78 185 2.512 66 751 764 40 10 366 190 147 158 236 1.158 6.661 Surface Water - - - - 57 - - - - - - - : 240 297 1998 Recycling. 33 125 1.270 4 410 572 25 9 100 68 74 85 : 672 3.447 Landfill 37 25 744 82 268 92 17 1 108 58 147 65 : 118 1.762 Incineration 11 50 558 - 52 214 – 3 150 66 – - : 144 1.248 Not Specified 32 - 89 - - – 1 - 23 4 25 - : 19 193 Total 113 200 2.661 86 787 878 43 13 381 196 246 150 : 1.193 6.947 Surface Water - - - - 57 - - - - - - - : - 57 2000 Recycling.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Legislation for the Reuse of Biosolids on Agricultural Land in Europe: Overview
    sustainability Review Legislation for the Reuse of Biosolids on Agricultural Land in Europe: Overview Maria Cristina Collivignarelli 1 , Alessandro Abbà 2, Andrea Frattarola 1, Marco Carnevale Miino 1 , Sergio Padovani 3, Ioannis Katsoyiannis 4,* and Vincenzo Torretta 5 1 Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, University of Pavia, via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy; [email protected] (M.C.C.); [email protected] (A.F.); [email protected] (M.C.M.) 2 Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brescia, via Branze 43, 25123 Brescia, Italy; [email protected] 3 ARPA Lombardia, Pavia Department, via Nino Bixio 13, 27100 Pavia, Italy; [email protected] 4 Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Chemical and Environmental Technology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece 5 Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, via G.B. Vico 46, 21100 Varese, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 September 2019; Accepted: 25 October 2019; Published: 29 October 2019 Abstract: The issues concerning the management of sewage sludge produced in wastewater treatment plants are becoming more important in Europe due to: (i) the modification of sludge quality (biological and chemical sludge are often mixed with negative impacts on sludge management, especially for land application); (ii) the evolution of legislation (landfill disposal is banned in many European countries); and (iii) the technologies for energy and material recovery from sludge not being fully applied in all European Member States. Furthermore, Directive 2018/851/EC introduced the waste hierarchy that involved a new strategy with the prevention in waste production and the minimization of landfill disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of a Water Treatment Sludge in a Sewage Sludge Dewatering Process
    E3S Web of Conferences 30, 02006 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183002006 Water, Wastewater and Energy in Smart Cities Use of a water treatment sludge in a sewage sludge dewatering process Justyna Górka1,*, Małgorzata Cimochowicz-Rybicka1 , and Małgorzata Kryłów1 1 University of Technology, Department of Environmental Engineering, 24 Warszawska, Cracow 31- 155, Poland Abstract. The objective of the research study was to determine whether a sewage sludge conditioning had any impact on sludge dewaterability. As a conditioning agent a water treatment sludge was used, which was mixed with a sewage sludge before a digestion process. The capillary suction time (CST) and the specific filtration resistance (SRF) were the measures used to determine the effects of a water sludge addition on a dewatering process. Based on the CST curves the water sludge dose of 0.3 g total volatile solids (TVS) per 1.0 g TVS of a sewage sludge was selected. Once the water treatment sludge dose was accepted, disintegration of the water treatment sludge was performed and its dewaterability was determined. The studies have shown that sludge dewaterability was much better after its conditioning with a water sludge as well as after disintegration and conditioning, if comparing to sludge with no conditioning. Nevertheless, these findings are of preliminary nature and future studies will be needed to investigate this topic. 1 Introduction Dewatering of sludge is a very important stage of the sludge processing. It reduces both sludge mass and volume, which consequently reduces costs of a further sludge processing, facilitates its transport and allows for its thermal processing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Waste Water Treatment Plant for the Disposal of Organic Waste from Mobile Toilets
    A Novel Waste Water Treatment Plant for The Disposal of Organic Waste from Mobile Toilets A Novel Waste Water Treatment Plant for The Disposal of Organic Waste from Mobile Toilets G. BONIFAZI, R. GASBARRONE, R. PALMIERI, G. CAPOBIANCO, S. SERRANTI Departments of Medical Sciences and Biotechnologies and of Chemical Eng. Materials, Environment- Sapienza University of Rome, Abstract The EU wastewater management industry is continuously looking for innovative technological solutions that can enter the market with a reduced environmental impact. This paper focuses on the problems associated to the disposal of human waste and on the specific market of the so-called mobile toilets. These are independent portable units equipped with sanitary tools that use chemical agents to disinfect the vessel and not connected to the sewer network. With growing awareness towards effective sanitation, mobile toilets have gained immense popularity in recent years and are now widely used at construction sites, event venues, public places, and in several other application like temporary refugee housing, migrants’ camps, military missions, cases of natural disasters, airplanes, trains, campers, caravans and campsites. This paper illustrates a new process for the disposal of organic waste from mobile toilets. Keywords: Waste Water Treatment Plants, Chemical Portable Toilets, Use of sludges in agriculture. 1. Introduction into surface and ground water and to avoid toxic effects on soil, plants, animals and humans. In The use of sludge in agriculture within the EU is most cases, national authorities have currently regulated only by the limits of heavy implemented policies supporting the use of metals (Cd, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn) listed in sludge in agriculture, as it is considered to be the Council Directive 86/278/EEC.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2 Sewage Sludge Incineration
    2.2 Sewage Sludge Incineration There are approximately 170 sewage sludge incineration (SSI) plants in operation in the United States. Three main types of incinerators are used: multiple hearth, fluidized bed, and electric infrared. Some sludge is co-fired with municipal solid waste in combustors based on refuse combustion technology (see Section 2.1). Refuse co-fired with sludge in combustors based on sludge incinerating technology is limited to multiple hearth incinerators only. Over 80 percent of the identified operating sludge incinerators are of the multiple hearth design. About 15 percent are fluidized bed combustors and 3 percent are electric. The remaining combustors co-fire refuse with sludge. Most sludge incinerators are located in the Eastern United States, though there are a significant number on the West Coast. New York has the largest number of facilities with 33. Pennsylvania and Michigan have the next-largest numbers of facilities with 21 and 19 sites, respectively. Sewage sludge incinerator emissions are currently regulated under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart O and 40 CFR Part 61, Subparts C and E. Subpart O in Part 60 establishes a New Source Performance Standard for particulate matter. Subparts C and E of Part 61--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)--establish emission limits for beryllium and mercury, respectively. In 1989, technical standards for the use and disposal of sewage sludge were proposed as 40 CFR Part 503, under authority of Section 405 of the Clean Water Act. Subpart G of this proposed Part 503 proposes to establish national emission limits for arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, and total hydrocarbons from sewage sludge incinerators.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Recovery from Sewage Sludge: the Case Study of Croatia
    energies Article Energy Recovery from Sewage Sludge: The Case Study of Croatia Dinko Đurđevi´c 1,* , Paolo Blecich 2 and Željko Juri´c 1 1 Energy Institute Hrvoje Požar, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 April 2019; Accepted: 16 May 2019; Published: 20 May 2019 Abstract: Croatia produced 21,366 tonnes of dry matter (DM) sewage sludge (SS) in 2016, a quantity expected to surpass 100,000 tonnes DM by 2024. Annual production rates for future wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) in Croatia are estimated at 5.8–7.3 Nm3/people equivalent (PE) for biogas and 20–25 kgDM/PE of sewage sludge. Biogas can be converted into 12–16 kWhel/PE of electricity and 19–24 kWhth/PE of heat, which is sufficient for 30–40% of electrical and 80–100% of thermal autonomy. The WWTP autonomy can be increased using energy recovery from sewage sludge incineration by 60% for electricity and 100% of thermal energy (10–13 kWhel/PE and 30–38 kWhth/PE). However, energy for sewage sludge drying exceeds energy recovery, unless solar drying is performed. 2 The annual solar drying potential is estimated between 450–750 kgDM/m of solar drying surface. The lower heating value of dried sewage sludge is 2–3 kWh/kgDM and this energy can be used for assisting sludge drying or for energy generation and supply to WWTPs. Sewage sludge can be considered a renewable energy source and its incineration generates substantially lower greenhouse gases emissions than energy generation from fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility of Heavy Metals in Municipal Sewage Sludge from Different Throughput Sewage Treatment Plants
    Pol. J. Environ. Stud. Vol. 21, No. 6 (2012), 1603-1611 Original Research Mobility of Heavy Metals in Municipal Sewage Sludge from Different Throughput Sewage Treatment Plants Jarosław Gawdzik1*, Barbara Gawdzik2** 1Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, Division of Waste Management, Al. 1000-lecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland 2Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Jan Kochanowski University of Humanities and Sciences, Świętokrzyska 15, 25-406 Kielce, Poland Received: 27 June 2011 Accepted: 11 May 2012 Abstract Sewage sludge heavy metals can be dissolved, precipitated, co-precipitated with metal oxides, and adsorbed or associated on the particles in biological debris. Heavy metals are found in the form of oxides, hydroxides, sulphides, sulphates, phosphates, silicates, organic bindings forming complexes with humic com- pounds, and complex sugars. Polish regulations specifying the maximum levels of heavy metals in municipal sewage sludge used for agricultural purposes refer to the total content of lead, cadmium, mercury, nickel, zinc, copper, and chromium. The aim of our study was to evaluate the mobility of heavy metals in sewage sludge from wastewater treatment plants in Świętokrzyskie Province. Stabilized sewage sludge from wastewater treatment was ana- lyzed in accordance with the extraction method proposed by the Community Bureau of Reference (BCR). Zinc, cadmium, lead, and nickel were determined by means of the standard addition with the use of a Perkin-Elmer 3100-BG FAAS atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Chromium and copper were tested using the FAAS technique. The sequence analysis revealed the presence of heavy metals in all fractions (F-I, F-II, F-III, F-IV).
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Economy in Wastewater Treatment Plant– Challenges and Barriers †
    Proceedings Circular Economy in Wastewater Treatment Plant– Challenges and Barriers † Ewa Neczaj * and Anna Grosser Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-343-250-917 † Presented at the 3rd EWaS International Conference on “Insights on the Water-Energy-Food Nexus”, Lefkada Island, Greece, 27–30 June 2018. Published: 31 July 2018 Abstract: The urban wastewater treatment plants can be an important part of circular sustainability due to integration of energy production and resource recovery during clean water production. Currently the main drivers for developing wastewater industry are global nutrient needs and water and energy recovery from wastewater. The article presents current trends in wastewater treatment plants development based on Circular Economy assumptions, challenges and barriers which prevent the implementation of the CE and Smart Cities concept with WWTPs as an important player. WWTPs in the near future are to become “ecologically sustainable” technological systems and a very important nexus in SMART cities. Keywords: circular economy; wastewater treatment plant; resource recovery 1. Introduction The circular economy (CE) is the concept in which products, materials (and raw materials) should remain in the economy for as long as possible, and waste should be treated as secondary raw materials that can be recycled to process and re-use [1]. This distinguishes it from a linear economy based on the, ‘take-make-use-dispose’ system, in which waste is usually the last stage of the product life cycle. CE is a concept promotes sustainable management of materials and energy by minimalizing the amount of waste generation and their reuse as a secondary material.
    [Show full text]
  • Synergistic Passivation of Fly Ash and TMT on Heavy Metals in Sewage Sludge
    sustainability Article Synergistic Passivation of Fly Ash and TMT on Heavy Metals in Sewage Sludge Dong-Fang Wang, Shi-He Li, Xian-Qing Wang, Ling-Xu Li and Xuan Zhang * College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Ji’nan 250353, China; [email protected] (D.-F.W.); [email protected] (S.-H.L.); [email protected] (X.-Q.W.); [email protected] (L.-X.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-531-89631680 Received: 11 November 2018; Accepted: 10 December 2018; Published: 12 December 2018 Abstract: Large amounts of fly ash and sewage sludge are produced annually in China. The treatment and disposal of such byproducts have become urgent problems that need to be solved. In order to achieve the possibility of realizing land applications for sewage sludge, fly ash and trimercapto-s- triazine trisodium salt (TMT) were used as immobilizing agents, and their passivation effects on four kinds of heavy metals (Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn) were evaluated. The results showed that the resulting sewage sludge met Chinese standard GB/T23486-2009. When the addition was 10–20% fly ash or 0.4–0.6% TMT, the optimum immobilization effect was obtained. The synergistic passivation of 20% fly ash +0.5% TMT was superior to that of either fly ash or TMT alone. The addition of sewage sludge during the ryegrass growth process significantly increased the plant height, the number of tillers, the chlorophyll content, and the biomass of the ryegrass over the brown soil. The adverse effect of the heavy metals on the ryegrass growth could be alleviated by the passivation effect of fly ash and TMT.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Atlas of Excreta, Wastewater Sludge, and Biosolids Management: Moving Forward the Sustainable and Welcome Uses of a Global Resource
    GLOBAL ATLAS OF EXCRETA, WASTEWATER SLUDGE, AND BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT: MOVING FORWARD THE SUSTAINABLE AND WELCOME USES OF A GLOBAL RESOURCE GLOBAL ATLAS OF EXCRETA, WASTEWATER SLUDGE, AND BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT: MOVING FORWARD THE SUSTAINABLE AND WELCOME USES OF A GLOBAL RESOURCE For further information please contact: Graham P. Alabaster Chief, Section I, Water, Sanitation and Infrastructure Branch Human Settlements Financing Division UN-HABITAT P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi 00100, Kenya Tel: +254 20 762 3054 Fax: +254 20 762 3588 [email protected] www.unhabitat.org Ronald J. LeBlanc Chairman – Greater Moncton Sewerage Commission Président – Commission d’épuration des eaux usées du Grand Moncton 355 chemin Hillsborough Road Riverview, New Brunswick (Nouveau-Brunswick) CANADA E1B 1S5 Tel: +1 506-387-7977 Fax: +1 506-387-7389 [email protected] www.gmsc.nb.ca Edited by: Ronald J. LeBlanc, Peter Matthews, Roland P. Richard Graphic design and layout: Daniel Vilnersson Cover pho to © Metrogro/Nikki Stefonick World map on chapter title pages is based on UN map no. 4136 rev. 5, September 2006. © United Nations Printed by HS/1030/08E ISBN: 978-92-1-132009-1 DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this atlas do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations, the Greater Moncton Sewerage Com- mission and the Editors concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or regarding its economic system or degree of development. The analysis and conclusions of this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or its Member States, the Greater Moncton Sewerage Commission and the Editors.
    [Show full text]
  • Sludge Treatment and Disposal Biological Wastewater Treatment Series
    Sludge Treatment and Disposal Biological Wastewater Treatment Series The Biological Wastewater Treatment series is based on the book Biological Wastewater Treatment in Warm Climate Regions and on a highly acclaimed set of best selling textbooks. This international version is comprised by six textbooks giving a state-of-the-art presentation of the science and technology of biological wastewater treatment. Titles in the Biological Wastewater Treatment series are: Volume 1: Wastewater Characteristics, Treatment and Disposal Volume 2: Basic Principles of Wastewater Treatment Volume 3: Waste Stabilisation Ponds Volume 4: Anaerobic Reactors Volume 5: Activated Sludge and Aerobic Biofilm Reactors Volume 6: Sludge Treatment and Disposal Biological Wastewater Treatment Series VOLUME SIX Sludge Treatment and Disposal Cleverson Vitorio Andreoli, Marcos von Sperling and Fernando Fernandes (Editors) Published by IWA Publishing, Alliance House, 12 Caxton Street, London SW1H 0QS, UK Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7654 5500; Fax: +44 (0) 20 7654 5555; Email: [email protected] Website: www.iwapublishing.com First published 2007 C 2007 IWA Publishing Copy-edited and typeset by Aptara Inc., New Delhi, India Printed by Lightning Source Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1998), no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher, or, in the case of photographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the appropriate reproduction rights organization outside the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Hard Facts About the Risks and Benefits of Using Treated Sewage Sludge/Biosolids on Land
    Hard Facts about the Risks and Benefits of using Treated Sewage Sludge/Biosolids on Land Benefits Biosolids, also known as treated sewage sludge reduce the need for frequent water are a source of organic matter, nitrogen, applications and can facilitate water phosphorus, and micronutrients. These materials conservation. are beneficial to agriculture, silviculture, • Sometimes biosolids are chemically stabilized horticulture, and land reclamation activities and with liming agents. Liming agents increase they improve agricultural productivity. More soil pH and can improve the soils ability to specifically, the benefits derived from biosolids soak in water. Higher pH soils tend to bind used as a soil amendment are as follows: most heavy metals, decreasing the chance of • Nitrogen is a basic nutrient for plant growth. the metals migrating to the ground water. It is present in different forms. In biosolids, it Risks and Benefits taken from the California State Water is present in the forms of ammonia, nitrates, Resources Control Board, “General Waste Discharge and organic nitrogen. The ammonia and Requirements for the Discharge of Biosolids to Land for Use as a Soil Amendment in Agricultural, Silvicultural, Horticultural, and nitrate forms of nitrogen are available for Land Reclamation Activities.” August, 2000. plant usage. Organic nitrogen is released slowly over many months, providing a continuous supply of nitrogen for crops and minimizing the potential for movement of nitrogen to ground water. Total nitrogen available to the plant at any given time is less than the total of these mineral forms due to the dynamic cycling of nitrogen in the soil. • Phosphorus is a basic nutrient for plant growth and is present in all biosolids in varying concentrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fecal Sludge Management in Developing Countries a Planning Manual
    First edition 2002 Fecal Sludge Management in Developing Countries A planning manual F l o r i a n K l i n g e l , Agnès Montangero, Doulaye Koné, and Martin Strauss Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science & Technology Department for Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries Planning of Fecal Sludge Management Foreword This manual has been produced by SANDEC, the Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries, which is part of the Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG). The main principles for strategic sanitation planing have been adopted from the guide “Strategic Planning for Municipal Planning” from GHK Research and Training Ltd. SANDEC has carried out a case study of fecal sludge management in order to enlighten the issues specific to planning of fecal sludge management. This study took place in the City of Nam Dinh, in Vietnam. The corresponding study report “Septage Management Study Nam Dinh” has been issued by SANDEC and the Nam Dinh Urban Development Project (funded by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation). This manual is a first approach to provide guidance on strategic planning of fecal sludge management. It is intended to further develop this manual. Therefore SANDEC will highly appreciate your comments and suggestions on the manual. For further information and comments, please contact Mr. Martin Strauss at: Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG) Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries (SANDEC) Management of Sludge
    [Show full text]