Tour of Rose History
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gardens R by DANIEL J
gARDENS r BY DANIEL J. FOLEY Editor of Horticulture REPRINTED FROM THE HERBARIST A Publication of The Herb Society of America No. 19 $<X>$«><>$*3><><>3><><>&3>3^^ For Use and for Delight :>>&<X><2><»3>'3K3x3>O<3K><>c?<>3><^ BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 1953 MARY GARDENS r c By DANIEL J. FOLEY MORE than a quarter of a century ago when I first began to explore the plant realm, I remember a visit I made one warm afternoon in June. It was to an old Salem garden where sweet William and fox- gloves, delphiniums and Canterbury bells, ferns and sweet rocket and a host of other plants flourished in a series of meandering bor- ders. The flower beds were edged with violets which were kept trim and formal by reason of the " bobbing " or shearing their owner gave them on several occasions through the summer months. I recall an espaliered peach tree which covered one side of the old tool shed, but most of all I remember a figure of Our Lady enshrined in a shady corner of the garden. My inquisitiveness got the better of me and I asked about the shrine. The dear old lady who tended the garden told me that she had dedicated her garden to Mary and, some- how, the thought lingered with me. At that time I knew nothing of the tradition of the Mary Gardens of the Middle Ages, but a few years later, while doing some research in college, I discovered a host of ancient plant traditions associated with the life of Our Lady. -
Taxonomic Review of the Genus Rosa
REVIEW ARTICLE Taxonomic Review of the Genus Rosa Nikola TOMLJENOVIĆ 1 ( ) Ivan PEJIĆ 2 Summary Species of the genus Rosa have always been known for their beauty, healing properties and nutritional value. Since only a small number of properties had been studied, attempts to classify and systematize roses until the 16th century did not give any results. Botanists of the 17th and 18th century paved the way for natural classifi cations. At the beginning of the 19th century, de Candolle and Lindley considered a larger number of morphological characters. Since the number of described species became larger, division into sections and subsections was introduced in the genus Rosa. Small diff erences between species and the number of transitional forms lead to taxonomic confusion and created many diff erent classifi cations. Th is problem was not solved in the 20th century either. In addition to the absence of clear diff erences between species, the complexity of the genus is infl uenced by extensive hybridization and incomplete sorting by origin, as well as polyploidy. Diff erent analytical methods used along with traditional, morphological methods help us clarify the phylogenetic relations within the genus and give a clearer picture of the botanical classifi cation of the genus Rosa. Molecular markers are used the most, especially AFLPs and SSRs. Nevertheless, phylogenetic relationships within the genus Rosa have not been fully clarifi ed. Th e diversity of the genus Rosa has not been specifi cally analyzed in Croatia until now. Key words Rosa sp., taxonomy, molecular markers, classifi cation, phylogeny 1 Agricultural School Zagreb, Gjure Prejca 2, 10040 Zagreb, Croatia e-mail: [email protected] 2 University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Biometrics, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Received: November , . -
Multiflora Rose, Rosa Multiflora Thunb. Rosaceae
REGULATORY HORTICULTURE [Vol. 9, No.1-2] Weed Circular No. 6 Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture April & October 1983 Bureau of Plant Industry Multiflora Rose, Rosa multiflora Thunb. Rosaceae. Robert J. Hill I. Nomenclature: A) Rosa multiflora Thunb. (Fig. 1); B) Multiflora rose; C) Synonyms: Rosa Dawsoniana Hort., R. polyantha Sieb. & Zucc., R. polyanthos Roessia., R. thyrsiflora Leroy, R. intermedia, Carr., and R. Wichurae Kock. Fig. 1. Multiflora rose. A) berrylike hips, B)leaf, note pectinate stipules (arrow), C) stem (cane). II. History: The genus Rosa is a large group of plants comprised of about 150 species, of which one-third are indigenous to America. Gray's Manual of Botany (Fernald 1970) lists 24 species (13 native; 11 introduced, 10 of these fully naturalized) for our range. Gleason and Cronquist (l968) cite 19 species (10 introductions). The disagreement in the potential number of species encountered in Pennsylvania arises from the confused taxonomy of a highly variable and freely crossing group. In fact, there are probably 20,000 cultivars of Rosa known. Bailey (1963) succinctly states the problem: "In no other genus, perhaps, are the opinions of botanists so much at variance in regard to the number of species." The use of roses by mankind has a long history. The Romans acquired a love for roses from the Persians. After the fall of Rome, roses were transported by the Benedictine monks across the Alps, and by the 700's AD garden roses were growing in southern France. The preservation and expansion of these garden varieties were continued by monasteries and convents from whence they spread to castle gardens and gradually to more humble, secular abodes. -
Drought Tolerant Roses
DROUGHT TOLERANT, LOW-MAINTENANCE ROSES ‘Aglaia’ ‘Alberic Barbier’ (Wichuraiana) ‘Albertine’ ‘American Pillar’ (Wichuraiana) ‘Anemone’ (Laevigata hybrid) ‘Banshee’ (Damask) ‘Belinda's Dream’ ‘Belle of Portugal’ ‘Blush Noisette’ ‘Caldwell Pink’ ‘Carefree Beauty’ ‘Cecile Brunner’ ‘Climbing Cecile Brunner’ ‘Climbing Pinkie’ ‘Climbing Souvenir de la Malmaison’ ‘Complicata’ ‘Crepuscule’ ‘Dorothy Perkins’ (Wichuraiana) ‘Double Plum’ ‘Dr. Van Fleet’ ‘Duchesse de Brabant ‘Else Poulsen’ ‘Fortune's Double Yellow’ ‘Francois Juranville’ ‘Frühlingsgold’ (Shrub) ‘Gardenia’ (Wichuraiana) ‘Gloire des Rosomanes’ ‘Golden Chersonese’ (Ecae hybrid) ‘Homestead’ (Hybrid China) ‘John Hopper’ ‘Knock Out’ ‘La Reine’ ‘Lady Hillingdon’ ‘Lawrence Johnston’ (Climber) ‘Marie Daly’ ‘Marie Pavie’ ‘Marie van Houtte’ ‘Mermaid’ ‘Mme. Alfred Carriere’ ‘Mme. Gabriel Luizet’ ‘Mme. Gregoire Staechelin’ ‘Mme. Plantier’ ‘Mrs. Herbert Stevens’ ‘Navaroo Ridge Noisette’ ‘New Dawn’ (Wichuraiana) ‘Papa Gontier’ ‘Paul Ricault’ ‘Paul's Double Musk’ ‘Penelope’ ‘Perle d'Or’ ‘Purezza’ (Banksiae hybrid) ‘Rambling Rector’ ‘Ramona (Laevigata hybrid) ‘Red Dorothy Perkins’ (Wichuraiana) ‘Russelliana’ ‘Sea Foam’ ‘Silver Moon’ wichuraiana ‘Stanwell Perpetual’ (Shrub) ‘Thérèse Bugnet’ (Rugosa hybrid) ‘The Fairy’ ‘Veilchenblau’ ‘Westerland’ ‘White Dorothy’ (Wichuraiana) ‘William Baffin’ ‘Wolley-Dod’ Rosa banksiae (“Lady Banks Rose”) Rosa californica Rosa californica ‘Elsie’ Rosa foetida bicolor (“Austrian Copper”) Rosa foetida persiana (“Persian Yellow”) Rosa gallica Rosa glauca Rosa laevigata (“Cherokee Rose”) Rosa minutifolia Rosa rubiginosa Rosa rugosa cultivars Rosa setigera Rosa spinosissima Rosa wichuraiana Rosa x Harisonii (“Harison's Yellow’”; Shrub) Rosa hugonis Rosa x odorata ‘Mutabilis’ Rosa xanthina (especially. f. hugonis) . -
Some Rose Species
ARNOLD ARBORETUM HARVARD UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION SERIES 4. VOL. VIII JUNE 28, 1940 NUMBER 6 SOME ROSE SPECIES are too little used in our present day landscaping. There mayROSES be several reasons for this, but after a careful examination of the types available, one is not surprised to find that there are cer- tain species which deserve a place in almost every garden. Attention is here called to some of the more outstanding rose species for use in modern gardens. The exact number of rose species has been a much debated point for many years. In 1892 Gandoger recognized 4266 species, while a few years before Bentham and Hooker recognized only 30-a rather striking difference of opinion! Be this as it may, Professor Alfred Rehder suggests that there are probably between 150 and 200 species of roses in the temperate and subtropical regions of the northern hem- isphere. On the basis of Rehder’s estimate, it is of interest to note that over one half of these occur in the living collections at the Arnold Arboretum, and that one nursery (Bobbink and Atkins) has recently listed 93 species and botanical varieties as being grown by them and ready for sale in the form of two year old, field grown plants. With these figures as a background, let us examine some of the im- portant reasons why more of these rose species should be grown in the garden. In the first place, as these are the wild roses of the world, they are entitled to a place in any wild garden, in the woodlands or at the border of roadways and woods. -
Transactions Dumfriesshire and Galloway Natural History Antiquarian Society
Transactions of the Dumfriesshire and Galloway Natural History and Antiquarian Society LXXXIV 2010 Transactions of the Dumfriesshire and Galloway Natural History and Antiquarian Society FOUNDED 20th NOVEMBER, 1862 THIRD SERIES VOLUME LXXXIV Editors: ELAINE KENNEDY FRANCIS TOOLIS ISSN 0141-1292 2010 DUMFRIES Published by the Council of the Society Office-Bearers 2009-2010 and Fellows of the Society President Morag Williams MA Vice Presidents Dr A Terry, Mr J L Williams, Mrs J Brann and Mr R Copeland Fellows of the Society Mr J Banks BSc, Mr A D Anderson BSc, Mr J Chinnock, Mr J H D Gair MA, Dr J B Wilson MD, Mr K H Dobie, Mrs E Toolis and Dr D F Devereux Mr L J Masters and Mr R H McEwen — appointed under Rule 10 Hon. Secretary John L Williams, Merkland, Kirkmahoe, Dumfries DG1 1SY Hon. Membership Secretary Miss H Barrington, 30 Noblehill Avenue, Dumfries DG1 3HR Hon. Treasurer Mr L Murray, 24 Corberry Park, Dumfries DG2 7NG Hon. Librarian Mr R Coleman, 2 Loreburn Park, Dumfries DG1 1LS Hon. Editors Mr James Williams (until November 2009) Elaine Kennedy, Nether Carruchan, Troqueer, Dumfries DG2 8LY (from January 2010) Dr F Toolis, 25 Dalbeattie Road, Dumfries DG2 7PF Dr J Foster (Webmaster), 21 Maxwell Street, Dumfries DG2 7AP Hon. Syllabus Convener Mrs E Toolis, 25 Dalbeattie Road, Dumfries DG2 7PF Hon. Curators Joanne Turner and Siobhan Ratchford Hon. Outings Organisers Mr J Copland and Mr A Gair Ordinary Members Mrs P G Williams, Mr D Rose, Mrs C Iglehart, Mr A Pallister, Mrs A Weighill, Mrs S Honey CONTENTS Rosa Gigantea - George Watt, including ‘On the Trail of Two Knights’ by Girija Viraraghavan by Morag Williams ........................................................... -
Ancy Is the Ability of a Plant to Flower More Than Once During the Course of a Growing Season Or Year
UNSH Newsletter Edition 2020.4 APRIL No part of this Newsletter can be reproduced without permission from the Editor. The Rose Society of NSW: Upper North Shore & Hills Regional Email: unsh. [email protected] Phone: 9653 2202 (9am - 7 pm) Facebook: UNSH Rose Regional UNSH meets on 3rd Sunday of each month in 2020. Meeting time: 2 pm Autumn/Winter;4 pm Spring/Summer PLEASE ARRIVE 15 minutes earlier to ‘Sign On’; buy raffle tickets Patron: Sandra Ross UNSH Rose Advisors: Brigitte & Klaus Eckart Chair & Editor: Kate Stanley Assistant Chair: David Smith UNSH Signature Roses: Sombreuil & Kardinal Treasurer: Judy Satchell Secretary: Paul Stanley STOP PRESS: The World Federation Rose Convention in Adelaide that was to be held in 2021, has just announced a postponement to 27th October- 3rd November 2022. LOOK ON PAGE 2 FOR WHAT’S HAPPENING AT UNSH Hybrid Tea Rose ‘Elina’ flowering now at ‘Birchgrove’. A stunning rose that has a spicy fragrance. Historically, Hybrid Tea roses are the choice of rose for exhibitors, as they have strong stems to hold up huge blooms which stay hydrated well; their form keeps in tact during transport and they hold onto their petals well. Floribundas and Miniature/ Minifloras are also prolifically used to exhibit now. UNSH introduced perfumed, Old Garden Roses on a larger scale into their two rose shows, to complete the rose profile available. ‘Elina‘ DICJANA, Hybrid tea ,lemon yellow,1984,Syn:Peaudouce, large, luminous, very double, 30-35 petals, 5-5.5.ins,tall growth, borne singly. R e – m o n t - a n c y ‘Remontancy is the ability of a plant to flower more than once during the course of a growing season or year. -
Rose Sampletext
A rose is a woody perennial flowering plant of the genus Rosa, in the • Synstylae – white, pink, and crimson flowered roses from all areas. family Rosaceae, or the flower it bears. There are over a hundred species and thousands of cultivars. They form a group of plants that can be erect shrubs, climbing or trailing with stems that are often Uses armed with sharp prickles. Flowers vary in size and shape and are Roses are best known as ornamental plants grown for their flowers in usually large and showy, in colours ranging from white through the garden and sometimes indoors. They have been also used for yellows and reds. Most species are native to Asia, with smaller numbers commercial perfumery and commercial cut flower crops. Some are used native to Europe, North America, and northwestern Africa. Species, as landscape plants, for hedging and for other utilitarian purposes such cultivars and hybrids are all widely grown for their beauty and often as game cover and slope stabilization. They also have minor medicinal are fragrant. Roses have acquired cultural significance in many uses. societies. Rose plants range in size from compact, miniature roses, to Ornamental plants climbers that can reach seven meters in height. Different species The majority of ornamental roses are hybrids that were bred for their hybridize easily, and this has been used in the development of the wide flowers. A few, mostly species roses are grown for attractive or scented range of garden roses. foliage (such as Rosa glauca and Rosa rubiginosa), ornamental thorns The name rose comes from French, itself from Latin rosa, which was (such as Rosa sericea) or for their showy fruit (such as Rosa moyesii). -
Rosas Antiguas- Búsquedas Y Hallazgos En El Territorio De Argentina
Conferencia en Uruguay, 19/08/2014 Rosas antiguas- Búsquedas y Hallazgos en el Territorio de Argentina Rafael Maino Las Rosas Antiguas Se considera antigua a toda rosa que existía antes del año 1867, fecha de introducción en el mercado de Rosas de la primera variedad Híbrida de Te, llamada 'La France'. Proyección de fotos Foto 2 'La France' Esta fecha es relativa pues hay variedades posteriores que se pueden considerar como antiguas por sus características más similares a aquellas que a las modernas, o sea, intervienen con alguna libertad puntos de vista individuales, ( en las muestras y concursos se debe respetar la decisión internacional en cuanto a esta fecha establecida como clasificatoria, ante la posibilidad que un jurado rechace los ejemplares presentados, aunque a veces estos sean benévolos y de amplio criterio, puede suceder lo contrario...) Los coleccionistas buscan cualquier posible información para fechar e identificar las más antiguas, las que cultivaban nuestros antepasados, y evitar así la posibilidad de desaparición que las acecha. Aunque no sean muy llamativos, algunos elementos nos permiten distinguir los rosales antiguos de los rosales creados por la horticultura contemporánea. Estos últimos, poseen en gral. y con algunas excepciones (p.ej. 'Clair Matin'), grandes hojas brillantes de cinco folíolos, repartidas en espacios por las ramas y su aspecto cambia muy poco de una variedad a otra. En cambio, los rosales antiguos poseen hojas de textura más variada, formadas por un mayor número de folíolos de tamaño más reducido. Los tallos de los rosales contemporáneos, provistos de fuertes espinas espaciadas, son más rectos y rígidos que los de los rosales antiguos. -
Rose Species Wealth
The Pharma Innovation Journal 2021; 10(7): 155-160 ISSN (E): 2277- 7695 ISSN (P): 2349-8242 NAAS Rating: 5.23 Rose species wealth: An overview TPI 2021; 10(7): 155-160 © 2021 TPI www.thepharmajournal.com Sindhuja Suram Received: 03-04-2021 Accepted: 09-05-2021 Abstract Sindhuja Suram Plant species are the gene pools for crop improvement. The rose species across the world lead to the Assistant Professor, Department improving new varieties. Most of the species are habituated to china. More than 350 promising varieties of Floriculture and Landscape and 14 species are maintained in India. A total of 25 species in the genus Rosa have been reported to Architecture, College of grow in the wild. Eight of these have contributed to the development of modern ornamentals in the group Horticulture, Sri Konda Laxman ‘Hybrid Teas’. The use of wild roses for various purposes was studied. Distribution of all Rosa species Telangana State Horticultural available in India was mapped. Two species - R. clinophylla and R. gigantea perform well in a wide University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India range of warm climates in India. R. clinophylla is perhaps the world’s only tropical rose species. R. gigantea grows luxuriantly in sub-tropical climates without harsh frosts are the species habituated in India. A large number of heritage roses exist in India. Two of the most interesting of these ‘found roses’ are Telangana pink and Kakinada red rose. The mapped species will be acting as gene pools for future rose breeding in India. Keywords: Rose species, breeding, genetic resources, wild roses, India Introduction The rose, the “Queen of flowers” belongs to genus Rosa and the Rosaceae family. -
2015 63 ASOCIACION ARGENTINA DE ROSICULTURA Fundada En El Año 1951 SOCIOS FUNDADORES F
Asociación Argentina de Rosicultura 2015 63 ASOCIACION ARGENTINA DE ROSICULTURA Fundada en el año 1951 SOCIOS FUNDADORES F. Macadam, O.S. Bush, T.E.B. Poole, C.H. Chevallier Boutell PRESIDENTES 1951/52 F. Macadam 1952/53 C.H. Chevallier Boutell 1953/54 T.E.B. Poole 1954/56 D.O. Williams 1956/58 C.H. Chevallier Boutell 1958/60 F. Macadam 1960/62 T.E.B. Poole 1962/64 J.H. Cameron 1964/65 F. Macadam 1965/67 L.N. Allan 1967/70 R.M. Powell, D.S.O., O.B.E. 1970/75 F. Kirton 1975/81 Sra. Poppy Niven 1981/83 Sra. Susan Begg 1983/84 Sra. Millicent Trench 1984/87 Sra. Madeleine Brisson 1987 Sra. Haydée Panzarini 1988 Sra. Aileen Thompson 1988/91 Sra. Ann Cowan 1991/94 Sra. Mary Howlin 1994/97 Sra. Valentina Casucci 1997/2000 Sra. Anita Monsegur 2000/2003 Sra. Lyda Chevallier Boutell 2003/2006 Sra. Nilda Crivelli 2006/2009 Sra. Esther Garabato 2009/2012 Sra. Nilda Crivelli 2012/2015 Sra. Bettina Crosta 2015/2018 Sra. Susana Ferrer SOCIOS HONORARIOS Sr. Robert Begg - Sra. M. Howlin - Sra. Valentina Casucci - Sra. A. Monsegur Sra. L. Chevalier Boutell - Sra. Lillian Brown de Basso - Sra. B. Vitassovich Sra. Nilda Crivelli - Sra. Norma Ordónez - Sr. Carlos Monsegur - Sra. Esther Garabato Sra. María Inés Montes - Sra. A. Balduzzi - Sra. Delia Caminotti - Sra. Myriam Richardson 64 Sra. Clotilde Mare65 - Sra. Mary Santarelli INDICE COMISION DIRECTIVA 2015 - 2018 Editorial ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Presidente Honorario Mensaje de la Presidente saliente ..................................................................................................... 5 Valentina Casucci Mensaje de la Presidente entrante .................................................................................................... 6 La Exposición de Primavera 2014 ................................................................................................... -
Supplementary Materialsofmolecular Identification And
Supplementary materials of Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Placement of Rosa arabica Crép. (Rosaceae), a Critically Endangered Plant Species Table S1. BLAST results for each barcode (single locus) of tested samples. Database search match for similarities and phylogenetic relationships of ITS, matK, rbcL, and trnL‐F sequences. Similarity Marker Retrieved taxa Accession No. Matching % Rosa arabica MT358870 ‐ Rosa canina FM164424.1 100.00 Rosa eglanteria FM164946.1 98.00 Rosa dumalis subsp. Dumalis FM164950.1 93.48 Rosa mollis FJ948761.1 98.00 Rosa phoenicia AB043829.1 90.48 Rosa gallica AB043824.1 95.0 Rosa rubiginosa AJ631885.1 97.49 Rosa sherardii FJ947108.1 96.00 Rosa laevigata KP093154.1 91.52 Rosa henryi KP0931151.1 91.52 Rosa moschata AB043004.1 90.76 ITS Rosa kwangtungensis KP093152.1 91.52 Rosa moschata subsp. plena AB043005.1 91.43 Rosa multiflora AY635026.1 91.19 Rosa odorata var. erubescens FJ527705.1 90.90 Rosa primula FJ527717.1 90.76 Rosa xanthina FJ416655.1 90.90 Rosa longicuspis FJ416657.1 90.88 Rosa multiflora var. Carnea FJ527701.1 92.00 Rosa soulieana FM164950.1 95.00 Rosa odorata var. Gigantea HM593916.1 92.00 Rosa odorata. var. odorata HM593912.1 93.00 Rosa davidii FJ384670.1 90.62 Rosa caudata HM593912.1 93.00 Life 2020, 10, 335; doi:10.3390/life10120335 www.mdpi.com/journal/life Life 2020, 10, 335 2 of 11 Rosa persetosa FJ416658.1 89.96 Rosa fedtschenkoana MH712606.1 91.45 Rosa davurica FJ527710.1 90.36 Rosa carolina DQ242526.1 90.82 Rosa virginiana DQ242527.1 90.82 Rosa blanda MG237272.1 90.10 Rosa rugosa