Dendritic Cell-Mediated Th2 Immunity and Immune Disorders

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dendritic Cell-Mediated Th2 Immunity and Immune Disorders International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Dendritic Cell-Mediated Th2 Immunity and Immune Disorders 1, 1,2, 1,2 1,2, Sunil Kumar y , Yideul Jeong y , Muhammad Umer Ashraf and Yong-Soo Bae * 1 Science Research Center (SRC) for Immune Research on Non-Lymphoid Organ (CIRNO), Sungkyunkwan University, Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16419, Korea; [email protected] (S.K.); [email protected] (Y.J.); [email protected] (M.U.A.) 2 Department of Biological Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16419, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-299-4149; Fax: +82-31-290-7087 These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 30 March 2019; Accepted: 29 April 2019; Published: 1 May 2019 Abstract: Dendritic cells (DCs) are the professional antigen-presenting cells that recognize and present antigens to naïve T cells to induce antigen-specific adaptive immunity. Among the T-cell subsets, T helper type 2 (Th2) cells produce the humoral immune responses required for protection against helminthic disease by activating B cells. DCs induce a Th2 immune response at a certain immune environment. Basophil, eosinophil, mast cells, and type 2 innate lymphoid cells also induce Th2 immunity. However, in the case of DCs, controversy remains regarding which subsets of DCs induce Th2 immunity, which genes in DCs are directly or indirectly involved in inducing Th2 immunity, and the detailed mechanisms underlying induction, regulation, or maintenance of the DC-mediated Th2 immunity against allergic environments and parasite infection. A recent study has shown that a genetic defect in DCs causes an enhanced Th2 immunity leading to severe atopic dermatitis. We summarize the Th2 immune-inducing DC subsets, the genetic and environmental factors involved in DC-mediated Th2 immunity, and current therapeutic approaches for Th2-mediated immune disorders. This review is to provide an improved understanding of DC-mediated Th2 immunity and Th1/Th2 immune balancing, leading to control over their adverse consequences. Keywords: dendritic cells; Th2 immunity; genetic factors; environmental factors; Th2 disorders; therapeutic approaches 1. Introduction Dendritic cells (DCs) are the professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that play an important role in immune defense by activating the adaptive immune system. DCs were first discovered by Steinman and Cohn in 1973 [1], and extensive studies have since been conducted related to the various DC subsets in humans and mice and their characteristics [2]. Different DC subsets or the same DC subset in different environments can induce different T-cell immunity [3–5]. T helper type 2 (Th2) immunity mainly performs two important interconnected functions, i.e., providing direct protection against the extracellular parasites (helminths), but this protective immunity occasionally leads to adverse reactions, such as an allergic response [6–8]. The protective functions of Th2 immunity for pathogen clearance are mediated by the induction of Th2 cytokines (interleukin 4 (IL-4), 5 (IL-5), 6 (IL-6), 10 (IL-10), and 13 (IL-13)) and the recruitment of B cells and eosinophils, while allergic responses are mediated by hypersecretion of IgE from B cells and histamines from mast cells and basophils. Genetic and environmental factors have also been considered to influence the Th2 immune response. Environmental factors include pathogens (bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites), foods, and allergens (house dust mites (HDMs), pollens, etc.), whereas genetic factors include the specific genes of DCs Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2159; doi:10.3390/ijms20092159 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2159 2 of 28 essential for induction of Th2 immunity. Other factors, such as hormones and lipids, also affect Th2 immunity, but details on these subjects are beyond the scope of this review. This review mainly covers DC-mediatedInt. J. Mol. Th2 Sci. 2018 immunity., 19, 2159 2 of 28 DCs are the first lines of immune defense that come into play once encountered with a foreign antigen(bacteria, and decide viruses, whether fungi, toand tolerate parasites), or elicitfoods, a and strong allergens immune (house response dust mites against (HDMs), it. Ifpollens, the response has alreadyetc.), intensified,whereas genetic the immunefactors include system the must specific decide genes what of DCs kind essential of response for induction is appropriate of Th2 to clear immunity. Other factors, such as hormones and lipids, also affect Th2 immunity, but details on these the pathogens. To accomplish this task, DCs engulf and present these antigens via cross-presentation subjects are beyond the scope of this review. This review mainly covers DC-mediated Th2 + + machineryimmunity. to CD4 naïve T or CD8 T cells (Figure1), leading to the birth of a specific T-cell subset, like T helperDCs types are the 1 (Th1),first lines 2 (Th2),of immune and defense 17 (Th17), that co andme into T regulatory play once enco (Treg)untered subsets with a orforeign cytotoxic T lymphocytesantigen (CTLs) and decide to orchestrate whether to immunetolerate or responses elicit a strong in both immune humans response and against mice [it.9]. If Athe pool response of cytokines releasedhas during already this intensified, process actuallythe immune governs system the must fates decide of these what T kind cells of to response acquire is specific appropriate T-cell to polarity. Differentiationclear the ofpathogens. Th1 cells To is triggeredaccomplish bythis interleukin task, DCs 12engulf (IL-12) and andpresent characterized these antigens by high-levelvia cross-presentation machinery to CD4+ naïve T or CD8+ T cells (Figure 1), leading to the birth of a γ secretionspecific of cytokines: T-cell subset, Interferon like T helper gamma types (IFN- 1 (Th1),), interleukin 2 (Th2), and 2 (IL-2), 17 (Th17), and and lymphotoxin, T regulatory which (Treg) recruits + macrophages,subsets or B-lymphocytes, cytotoxic T lymphocytes CD8 T (CTLs) cells, naturalto orchestrate killer immune (NK) cells,responses and in neutrophils both humans to and the site of infectionmice to impart[9]. A pool protective of cytokines Th1 rele immunityased during in this both process humans actually and governs mice [the10]. fates Conversely, of these T cells Th2 to cells are triggeredacquire by IL-4 specific and T-cell characterized polarity. Differentiation by high-level of Th1 secretion cells is triggered of IL-4, by IL-5, interleukin and IL-13, 12 (IL-12) which and activate B cells tocharacterized produce immunoglobulinby high-level secretion E (IgE) of cytokines: and recruit Interferon basophils gamma to (IFN- mediateγ), interleukin Th2-specific 2 (IL-2), immune and lymphotoxin, which recruits macrophages, B-lymphocytes, CD8+ T cells, natural killer (NK) responses in both humans and mice [11]. Despite the crucial role of T-cell subsets in host defense, cells, and neutrophils to the site of infection to impart protective Th1 immunity in both humans and they aremice also [10]. associated Conversely, with Th2 severe cells are immune triggered pathologies, by IL-4 and includingcharacterized hypersensitivity, by high-level secretion tumorigenesis, of and autoimmunityIL-4, IL-5, and [IL-13,12]. The which mechanisms activate B cells controlling to produce immunoglobulin the differentiation E (IgE) of and Th1, recruit Th17, basophils and Treg cells are wellto described. mediate Th2-specific However, immune the detailsresponses of in Th2 both di humansfferentiation and mice by [11]. specific Despite subsets the crucial of role DCs of remain controversial.T-cell subsets Gao in et host al. (2013)defense, investigated they are also associated the role ofwith the severe IRF4 immune+ DC subset pathologies, in initiating including the Th2 responsehypersensitivity, in mice [13]. Murphytumorigenesis, et al. (2015)and autoimmu suggestednity that[12]. a Klf4-expressingThe mechanisms DCcontrolling subset isthe required differentiation of Th1, Th17, and Treg cells are well described. However, the details of Th2 for Th2 responses in mice [14]. A recent study by Ahmed et al. (2017) has shown that a DC subset differentiation by specific subsets of DCs remain controversial. Gao et al. (2013) investigated the role expressingof the SH2 IRF4 domain-containing+ DC subset in initiating adaptor the Th2 response protein in B mice (SHB) [13]. ensures Murphy Th2 et al. homeostasis (2015) suggested by that regulating DC-mediateda Klf4-expressing Th2 immunity DC subset in an is atopicrequired dermatitis for Th2 responses (AD) mouse in mice model [14]. A [recent15]. These study findingsby Ahmed prompted et us to investigateal. (2017) has the shown role of that these a DC genes subset in expressing DC-mediated SH2 domain-containing Th2 immunity. Inadaptor this review, protein weB (SHB) discuss DC subsetsensures and genes Th2 ofhomeostasis interest in by DCs regulating essential DC-mediated for induction Th2 ofimmunity Th2 immune in an atopic responses dermatitis in the (AD) context of mouse model [15]. These findings prompted us to investigate the role of these genes in DC-mediated allergic diseases and illustrate the well-coordinated interplay of different signaling pathways, such as Th2 immunity. In this review, we discuss DC subsets and genes of interest in DCs essential for transcriptioninduction factors, of Th2 cytokines, immune epigenetics, responses in and the microRNAs, context of allergic which arediseases essential and toillustrate obtain anthe optimal Th2 response.well-coordinated interplay of different signaling pathways, such as transcription factors, cytokines, epigenetics, and microRNAs, which are essential to obtain an optimal Th2 response. Figure 1.FigureSchematic 1. Schematic diagram diagram for for the the cross-presentation cross-presentation ma machinerychinery of ofDCs. DCs. DCs DCstake up take extracellular up extracellular antigen, process it to antigenic peptides, and present these peptides not only with MHC II through antigen, process it to antigenic peptides, and present these peptides not only with MHC II through the MIIC to CD4+ T cells (left), but also with MHC I through proteasome and the TAP/ER pathway to CD8+ T cells (right). Int. J. Mol.
Recommended publications
  • Urticaria Is a Skin Condition Commonly Known As Hives. It Produces an Itchy Rash That Tends to Come and Go and Can Last for a Variable Period of Time
    Hives Also known as Urticaria What is urticaria? Urticaria is a skin condition commonly known as hives. It produces an itchy rash that tends to come and go and can last for a variable period of time. The condition can be acute (lasting less than 6 weeks) or chronic (lasting longer than 6 weeks). Most cases of urticaria have no known cause. What causes urticaria? Urticaria occurs when certain substances such as histamine are released from specific cells in the skin. This process is usually triggered by various immunologic mechanisms, most commonly involving the presee of irulatig IgE atiodies, although other pathays ay also e ioled. The ause of this iuologi triggerig is uko i the ajority of ases, ut a soeties e associated with various types of infections, chronic immunologic diseases or allergy to foods or medications. The use of intravenous dyes during some radiological tests can sometimes trigger urticaria as well. Physical urticaria is a type of urticaria that may be caused by exposure of the skin to cold, heat, pressure or rubbing. What does urticaria look like? Urticaria typically looks like a raised rash that may be a normal skin colour or pinkish or red in colour. The rash may occur anywhere on the body and often starts off as small round spots that quickly enlarge and spread. The rash can be very itchy but it usually only lasts for a few hours before settling, and eventually resolving completely within 24 to 48 hours. Which other problems may occur with urticaria? A viral illness can occur before urticaria develops, especially in children.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Allergy Outline
    Allergy Evaluation-What it all Means & Role of Allergist Sai R. Nimmagadda, M.D.. Associated Allergists and Asthma Specialists Ltd. Clinical Assistant Professor Of Pediatrics Northwestern University Chicago, Illinois Objectives of Presentation • Discuss the different options for allergy evaluation. – Skin tests – Immunocap Testing • Understand the results of Allergy testing in various allergic diseases. • Briefly Understand what an Allergist Does Common Allergic Diseases Seen in the Primary Care Office • Atopic Dermatitis/Eczema • Food Allergy • Allergic Rhinitis • Allergic Asthma • Allergic GI Diseases Factors that Influence Allergies Development and Expression Host Factors Environmental Factors . Genetic Indoor allergens - Atopy Outdoor allergens - Airway hyper Occupational sensitizers responsiveness Tobacco smoke . Gender Air Pollution . Obesity Respiratory Infections Diet © Global Initiative for Asthma Why Perform Allergy Testing? – Confirm Allergens and answer specific questions. • Am I allergic to my dog? • Do I have a milk allergy? • Have I outgrown my allergy? • Do I need medications? • Am I penicillin allergic? • Do I have a bee sting allergy Tests Performed in the Diagnostic Allergy Laboratory • Allergen-specific IgE (over 200 allergen extracts) – Pollen (weeds, grasses, trees), – Epidermal, dust mites, molds, – Foods, – Venoms, – Drugs, – Occupational allergens (e.g., natural rubber latex) • Total Serum IgE (anti-IgE; ABPA) • Multi-allergen screen for IgE antibody Diagnostic Allergy Testing Serological Confirmation of Sensitization History of RAST Testing • RAST (radioallergosorbent test) invented and marketed in 1974 • The suspected allergen is bound to an insoluble material and the patient's serum is added • If the serum contains antibodies to the allergen, those antibodies will bind to the allergen • Radiolabeled anti-human IgE antibody is added where it binds to those IgE antibodies already bound to the insoluble material • The unbound anti-human IgE antibodies are washed away.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Mucosal Immune
    Recent advances in basic science Recent advances in inflammatory bowel disease: Gut: first published as 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303955 on 8 October 2013. Downloaded from mucosal immune cells in intestinal inflammation M Zaeem Cader,1,2 Arthur Kaser1 1Department of Medicine, ABSTRACT Recent years have seen a rapid and exciting Division of Gastroenterology & The intestine and its immune system have evolved to expansion in our understanding of the mucosal Hepatology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s meet the extraordinary task of maintaining tolerance to immune system with novel insights into environ- Hospital, Cambridge, UK the largest, most complex and diverse microbial mental influences of diet and the microbiota; the 2Wellcome Trust PhD commensal habitat, while meticulously attacking and convergence and integration of fundamental cellu- Programme for Clinicians, containing even minute numbers of occasionally lar processes such as autophagy, microbial sensing Cambridge Institute for incoming pathogens. While our understanding is still far and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress; as well as Medical Research, School of Clinical Medicine, University of from complete, recent studies have provided exciting the discovery of new cell types, for example innate Cambridge, Cambridge, UK novel insights into the complex interplay of the many lymphoid cells (ILCs). distinct intestinal immune cell types as well as the The gut is unlike the systemic immune system in Correspondence to discovery of entirely new cell subsets. These studies have several respects and much of the extensive reper- Dr Arthur Kaser, Department of Medicine, Division of also revealed how proper development and function of toire of immune cells and their characteristics are Gastroenterology and the intestinal immune system is dependent on its specific indeed unique to the intestine.
    [Show full text]
  • White Blood Cells and Severe COVID-19: a Mendelian Randomization Study
    Journal of Personalized Medicine Article White Blood Cells and Severe COVID-19: A Mendelian Randomization Study Yitang Sun 1 , Jingqi Zhou 1,2 and Kaixiong Ye 1,3,* 1 Department of Genetics, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; [email protected] (Y.S.); [email protected] (J.Z.) 2 School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China 3 Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-706-542-5898; Fax: +1-706-542-3910 Abstract: Increasing evidence shows that white blood cells are associated with the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the direction and causality of this association are not clear. To evaluate the causal associations between various white blood cell traits and the COVID-19 susceptibility and severity, we conducted two-sample bidirectional Mendelian Randomization (MR) analyses with summary statistics from the largest and most recent genome-wide association studies. Our MR results indicated causal protective effects of higher basophil count, basophil percentage of white blood cells, and myeloid white blood cell count on severe COVID-19, with odds ratios (OR) per standard deviation increment of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.60–0.95), 0.70 (95% CI: 0.54–0.92), and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73–0.98), respectively. Neither COVID-19 severity nor susceptibility was associated with white blood cell traits in our reverse MR results. Genetically predicted high basophil count, basophil percentage of white blood cells, and myeloid white blood cell count are associated with a lower risk of developing severe COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Diseases, PLAID, APLAID, FCAS3 and CVID and One Gene
    Four diseases, PLAID, APLAID, FCAS3 and CVID and one gene (PHOSPHOLIPASE C, GAMMA-2; PLCG2 ) : striking clinical phenotypic overlap and difference Necil Kutukculer1, Ezgi Yilmaz1, Afig Berdeli1, Raziye Burcu G¨uven Bilgin1, Ayca Aykut1, Asude Durmaz1, Ozgur Cogulu1, G¨uzideAksu1, and Neslihan Karaca1 1Ege University Faculty of Medicine May 15, 2020 Abstract We suggest PLAID,APLAID and FCAS3 have to be considered as same diseases,because of our long-term clinical experiences and genetic results in six patients.Small proportion of CVID patients are also PLAID/APLAID/FCAS3 patients and all these have disease-causing-mutations in PLCG2-genes,so it may be better to define all of them as “PLCG2 deficiency”. Key Clinical Message: Germline mutations in PLCG2 gene cause PLAID,APLAID,FCAS3, and CVID.Clinical experiences in patients with PLCG2 mutations led us to consider that PLAID, APLAID and FCAS3 are same diseases.It may be better to define all of them as “PLCG2 deficiency”. INTRODUCTION The PLCG2 gene which is located on the 16th chromosome (16q23.3) encodes phospholipase Cg2 (PLCG2), a transmembrane signaling enzyme that catalyzes the production of second messenger molecules utilizing calcium as a cofactor and propagates downstream signals in several hematopoietic cells (1). Recently, het- erozygous germline mutations in human PLCG2 were linked to some clinical phenotypes with some overlap- ping features|PLCg2-associated antibody deficiency and immune dysregulation syndrome (PLAID) (OMIM 614878) and autoinflammation, antibody deficiency, and immune dysregulation syndrome (APLAID) (OMIM 614878) (2-4) and familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome (FCAS3) (OMIM 614468) (5). All of them are autosomal dominant inherited diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Allergen Regulations 105 Cmr 590.000
    ALLERGEN REGULATIONS 105 CMR 590.000: STATE SANITARY CODE CHAPTER X – MINIMUM SANITATION STANDARDS FOR FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS (1) ADD new definition in 105 CMR 590.002(B): Major Food Allergen means: (1) Milk, eggs, fish (such as bass, flounder, or cod), crustaceans (such as crab, lobster, or shrimp), tree nuts (such as almonds, pecans, or walnuts), wheat, peanuts, and soybeans; and (2) A FOOD ingredient that contains protein derived from a FOOD named in subsection (1). "Major food allergen" does not include: (a) Any highly refined oil derived from a FOOD specified in subsection (1) or any ingredient derived from such highly refined oil; or (b) Any ingredient that is exempt under the petition or notification process specified in the federal Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-282). (2) Amend the definitions of “menu” and “menu board” in 590.002(B) as follows: Menu means a printed list or pictorial display of a food item or items and their price(s) that are available for sale from a food establishment, and includes menus distributed or provided outside of the establishment. Menu Board means any list or pictorial display of a food item or items and their price(s) posted within or outside a food establishment. (3) Amend as follows 105 CMR 590.003(B) (Management and Personnel – federal 1999 Food Code Chapter 2) (B) FC 2-102.11 Demonstration … The areas of knowledge include: . (17) No later than February 1, 2011: (a) Describing FOODS identified as MAJOR FOOD ALLERGENS and describing the symptoms that MAJOR FOOD ALLERGENS could cause in a sensitive individual who has an allergic reaction; and (b) Ensuring that employees are properly trained in food allergy awareness as it relates to their assigned duties.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Allergen Labeling Exemption Petitions and Notifications: Guidance for Industry
    Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Food Allergen Labeling Exemption Petitions and Notifications: Guidance for Industry Additional copies are available from: Office of Food Additive Safety, HFS-205 Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Food and Drug Administration 5001 Campus Drive College Park, MD 20740 (Tel) 240-402-1200 http://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances You may submit either electronic or written comments regarding this guidance at any time. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the guidance to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition June 2015 Petitions and Notifications Guidance Page 1 of 18 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Statutory Authority III. Recommendations for Preparing Submissions IV. Additional Information for Petitions V. Additional Information for Notifications VI. Appendices Petitions and Notifications Guidance Page 2 of 18 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Food Allergen Labeling Exemption Petitions and Notifications Guidance for Industry This guidance represents the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for implementing this guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive QSAR Tools to Aid in Early Process Development of Monoclonal Antibodies
    Predictive QSAR tools to aid in early process development of monoclonal antibodies John Micael Andreas Karlberg Published work submitted to Newcastle University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Engineering November 2019 Abstract Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become one of the fastest growing markets for diagnostic and therapeutic treatments over the last 30 years with a global sales revenue around $89 billion reported in 2017. A popular framework widely used in pharmaceutical industries for designing manufacturing processes for mAbs is Quality by Design (QbD) due to providing a structured and systematic approach in investigation and screening process parameters that might influence the product quality. However, due to the large number of product quality attributes (CQAs) and process parameters that exist in an mAb process platform, extensive investigation is needed to characterise their impact on the product quality which makes the process development costly and time consuming. There is thus an urgent need for methods and tools that can be used for early risk-based selection of critical product properties and process factors to reduce the number of potential factors that have to be investigated, thereby aiding in speeding up the process development and reduce costs. In this study, a framework for predictive model development based on Quantitative Structure- Activity Relationship (QSAR) modelling was developed to link structural features and properties of mAbs to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) retention times and expressed mAb yield from HEK cells. Model development was based on a structured approach for incremental model refinement and evaluation that aided in increasing model performance until becoming acceptable in accordance to the OECD guidelines for QSAR models.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Genes Used in Cell Type Enrichment Analysis
    List of genes used in cell type enrichment analysis Metagene Cell type Immunity ADAM28 Activated B cell Adaptive CD180 Activated B cell Adaptive CD79B Activated B cell Adaptive BLK Activated B cell Adaptive CD19 Activated B cell Adaptive MS4A1 Activated B cell Adaptive TNFRSF17 Activated B cell Adaptive IGHM Activated B cell Adaptive GNG7 Activated B cell Adaptive MICAL3 Activated B cell Adaptive SPIB Activated B cell Adaptive HLA-DOB Activated B cell Adaptive IGKC Activated B cell Adaptive PNOC Activated B cell Adaptive FCRL2 Activated B cell Adaptive BACH2 Activated B cell Adaptive CR2 Activated B cell Adaptive TCL1A Activated B cell Adaptive AKNA Activated B cell Adaptive ARHGAP25 Activated B cell Adaptive CCL21 Activated B cell Adaptive CD27 Activated B cell Adaptive CD38 Activated B cell Adaptive CLEC17A Activated B cell Adaptive CLEC9A Activated B cell Adaptive CLECL1 Activated B cell Adaptive AIM2 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive BIRC3 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive BRIP1 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive CCL20 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive CCL4 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive CCL5 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive CCNB1 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive CCR7 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive DUSP2 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive ESCO2 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive ETS1 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive EXO1 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive EXOC6 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive IARS Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive ITK Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive KIF11 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive KNTC1 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive NUF2 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive PRC1 Activated
    [Show full text]
  • Cytokine Nomenclature
    RayBiotech, Inc. The protein array pioneer company Cytokine Nomenclature Cytokine Name Official Full Name Genbank Related Names Symbol 4-1BB TNFRSF Tumor necrosis factor NP_001552 CD137, ILA, 4-1BB ligand receptor 9 receptor superfamily .2. member 9 6Ckine CCL21 6-Cysteine Chemokine NM_002989 Small-inducible cytokine A21, Beta chemokine exodus-2, Secondary lymphoid-tissue chemokine, SLC, SCYA21 ACE ACE Angiotensin-converting NP_000780 CD143, DCP, DCP1 enzyme .1. NP_690043 .1. ACE-2 ACE2 Angiotensin-converting NP_068576 ACE-related carboxypeptidase, enzyme 2 .1 Angiotensin-converting enzyme homolog ACTH ACTH Adrenocorticotropic NP_000930 POMC, Pro-opiomelanocortin, hormone .1. Corticotropin-lipotropin, NPP, NP_001030 Melanotropin gamma, Gamma- 333.1 MSH, Potential peptide, Corticotropin, Melanotropin alpha, Alpha-MSH, Corticotropin-like intermediary peptide, CLIP, Lipotropin beta, Beta-LPH, Lipotropin gamma, Gamma-LPH, Melanotropin beta, Beta-MSH, Beta-endorphin, Met-enkephalin ACTHR ACTHR Adrenocorticotropic NP_000520 Melanocortin receptor 2, MC2-R hormone receptor .1 Activin A INHBA Activin A NM_002192 Activin beta-A chain, Erythroid differentiation protein, EDF, INHBA Activin B INHBB Activin B NM_002193 Inhibin beta B chain, Activin beta-B chain Activin C INHBC Activin C NM005538 Inhibin, beta C Activin RIA ACVR1 Activin receptor type-1 NM_001105 Activin receptor type I, ACTR-I, Serine/threonine-protein kinase receptor R1, SKR1, Activin receptor-like kinase 2, ALK-2, TGF-B superfamily receptor type I, TSR-I, ACVRLK2 Activin RIB ACVR1B
    [Show full text]
  • Kate Fitzgerald
    In This Issue: 2020 Young Investigator Awardees pg. 3-9 In Memorium page pg. 14-15 New Member Mini-Bios pg. 19-21 Trials of Interferon Lambda pg. 31 Cytokines 2021 Hybrid Meetin pg. 24-27 Signals THE INTERNATIONAL CYTOKINE & INTERFERON SOCIETY + NEWSLETTER APRIL 2021 I VOLUME 9 I NO. 1 A NOTE FROM THE ICIS PRESIDENT Kate Fitzgerald Dear Colleagues, Greetings from the International Cytokine and Interferon Society! I hope you and your family are staying safe during these still challenging times. Thankfully 2020 is behind us now. We have lived through the COVID-19 pandemic, an event that will continue to impact our lives for some time and likely alter how we live in the future. Despite the obvious difficulties of this past year, I can’t help but marvel at the scientific advances that have been made. With everything from COVID-19 testing, to treatments and especially to the rapid pace of vaccine development, we are so better off today than even a few months back. The approval of remarkably effective COVID-19 vaccines now rolling out in the US, Israel, UK, Europe and across the globe, brings light at the end of the tunnel. The work of many of you has helped shape our understanding of the host response to Sars-CoV2 and the ability of this virus to limit antiviral immunity while simultaneously driving a cytokine driven hyperinflammatory response leading to deadly consequences for patients. The knowledge gained from all of your efforts has been put to good use to stem the threat of this deadly virus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Immune Cells in the Uveal Tract of the Normal Eye
    THE DISTRIBUTION OF IMMUNE CELLS IN THE UVEAL TRACT OF THE NORMAL EYE PAUL G. McMENAMIN Perth, Western Australia SUMMARY function of these cells in the normal iris, ciliary body Inflammatory and immune-mediated diseases of the and choroid. The role of such cell types in ocular eye are not purely the consequence of infiltrating inflammation, which will be discussed by other inflammatory cells but may be initiated or propagated authors in this issue, is not the major focus of this by immune cells which are resident or trafficking review; however, a few issues will be briefly through the normal eye. The uveal tract in particular considered where appropriate. is the major site of many such cells, including resident tissue macro phages, dendritic cells and mast cells. This MACRO PHAGES review considers the distribution and location of these and other cells in the iris, ciliary body and choroid in Mononuclear phagocytes arise from bone marrow the normal eye. The uveal tract contains rich networks precursors and after a brief journey in the blood as of both resident macrophages and MHe class 11+ monocytes immigrate into tissues to become macro­ dendritic cells. The latter appear strategically located to phages. In their mature form they are widely act as sentinels for capturing and sampling blood-borne distributed throughout the body. Macrophages are and intraocular antigens. Large numbers of mast cells professional phagocytes and play a pivotal role as are present in the choroid of most species but are effector cells in cell-mediated immunity and inflam­ virtually absent from the anterior uvea in many mation.1 In addition, due to their active secretion of a laboratory animals; however, the human iris does range of important biologically active molecules such contain mast cells.
    [Show full text]