DOCSLIB.ORG

Lodge Farm Fisheries Landscape & Visual Effects Assessment Angling Lakes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LODGE FARM FISHERIES LANDSCAPE & VISUAL EFFECTS ASSESSMENT ANGLING LAKES December 2012 Our Ref: JSL1930/REP/01 Rev B RPS Lakesbury House Hiltingbury House Chandlers Ford Hampshire S053 5SS Tel: 023 8081 0440 Fax: 023 8081 0449 Email: [email protected] rpsgroup.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: Paul Hopper Authorised by: Craig Thomson Date: December 2012 Project Number/Document JSL1930/REP/01 Rev B Reference: COPYRIGHT © RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Lodge Farm Fisheries and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of RPS. rpsgroup.com CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 2 METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................. 4 3 PLANNING POLICY AND GUIDANCE .............................................................................................. 9 4 LANDSCAPE BASELINE.................................................................................................................14 5 VISUAL BASELINE..........................................................................................................................20 6 ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS...........................................................................................................22 7 CONCLUSIONS ...............................................................................................................................29 FIGURES: FIG 1 Landscape Planning Designations FIG 2 District Landscape Character Parcels FIG 3 Topography FIG 4 Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) FIG 5 TO 9 Viewpoints 1 to 5 APPENDICES: APPENDIX 1 Extract from Bassetlaw Landscape character Assessment 2008: ’10 Ranskill’ APPENDIX 2 Visual Receptors within the Study Area APPENDIX 3 Visual Effects from Representative Viewpoints rpsgroup.com 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.1.1 This assessment of potential landscape and visual effects forms part of a planning submission to Nottinghamshire County Council for the development of an area of land currently under agricultural land management to the south of Bawtry, north Nottinghamshire (hereinafter referred to as the proposal site). The planning submission proposes the creation of two fishing lakes through the excavation of materials (comprising sandstone and sand and gravels) from the proposal site and their transport to Scrooby Top Quarry to the immediate west. Following completion of the construction works the area of development will be landscaped and treated to form two waterbodies prior to the angling uses commencing. 1.1.2 This assessment considers the effects the development (hereinafter referred to as the scheme) would have on the existing landscape, its characteristic features and the people who view it. It describes the existing landscape and views (baseline conditions) against which the degree of any change resulting from the scheme can be assessed. For the purposes of this assessment the potential landscape and visual effects of the scheme have been assessed at the following stages: Landscape Effects: 8 Construction Phase; and 8 Residual landscape effects at Year 15. Visual Effects: 8 Construction Phase; 8 Year 1 following completion of the scheme (including restoration proposals); and 8 Residual visual effects at Year 15. 1.1.3 It is intended that the scheme will precede the permitted extraction of sand and gravel from an adjoining area to the immediate north of the proposal site; this adjoining area would be restored to form a single waterbody with nature conservation/ low key recreational watersports as afteruses. For the purposes of this assessment, the potential landscape and visual effects of the scheme in association with the area of working to the north have been considered as part of the assessment of potential cumulative effects. The main focus of this assessment is therefore the potential landscape and visual effects associated with the scheme rather than its potential effects in association with the planned area of working to the north. 1.1.4 This assessment considers the effects the development (hereinafter referred to as the scheme) would have on the existing landscape, its characteristic features and the people who view it. It describes the existing landscape and views (baseline conditions) against which the degree of any change resulting from the scheme can be assessed. 1.2 Approach to Assessment 1.2.1 The methodology for the landscape and visual assessment of the scheme follows relevant standards and guidance that is set out in: Landscape Institute and Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (2002) ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Second Edition’; and 1 rpsgroup.com Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage (2002) ‘Landscape Character Assessment – Guidance for England and Scotland. 1.2.2 Further information on the methodological approach is provided in chapter 2. 1.2.3 The assessment was carried out in November 2012. Fieldwork was undertaken on 8 November 2012. 1.3 Scope of Work 1.3.1 In order to undertake the assessment, several clear stages were identified and addressed in accordance with the prescribed methodology, including: A desktop review of current statutory and non-statutory documents; A desktop review of existing landscape characterisation material; Establishment of a Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) for the construction phase of the scheme; Identification of a range of visual receptor groups within the study area; and An assessment of the magnitude and significance of effects upon the landscape, its character and the visual environment during the construction and the operational phase of the scheme. 1.4 Sources of Information 1.4.1 The desk top study commenced with a review of data collected from the following sources: National, County and Local Planning Policy; The Countryside Agency (now Natural England); Ordnance Survey; and Aerial photography. 1.5 Proposal Site Location and Context 1.5.1 The scheme would be sited at National Grid Reference 465540,389298 near Bawtry, Nottinghamshire. The proposal site extends to approximately 4.9 ha inclusive of soils storage areas. It adjoins the existing (active) Scrooby Top Quarry, between Bawtry in the north and Ranskill in the south. 1.5.2 Other than the currently active mineral workings in the surrounding area is predominantly agriculture. There are also blocks of woodland and a number of waterbodies, most of which are the result of former mineral extraction. 1.6 Study Area 1.6.1 It is accepted practice within landscape and visual assessment work that the extent of the study area is broadly defined by the visual envelope to the proposal site and the extent of the zone of theoretical visibility (ZTV) arising from the scheme itself. 1.6.2 The study area is defined by a 5 km radius from the approximate centre of the proposal site. The extent of visibility of a proposed development depends on a number of factors including the scale of the development, the relationship between the viewpoint and the development itself, the 2 rpsgroup.com context within which the development is seen and the prevailing meteorological and weather conditions. 1.6.3 The greater part of the study area lies within the administrative area of Bassetlaw District Council with a relatively small part of the study area within the adjoining Doncaster Metropolitan District Council. 1.7 Proposed Development 1.7.1 The scheme comprises the creation of two angling lakes through the excavation of materials comprising sandstone and sand and gravels using mechanical means and the transport of the materials to the existing Scrooby Top Quarry. 1.8 Inter-relationships with other Projects 1.8.1 As previously stated, the scheme would precede the working of a neighbouring permitted minerals reserve to the immediate north of the proposal site. The stages at which the potential cumulative landscape and visual effects of the two schemes has been assessed in this study are as follows: Table 1: Cumulative Effects Angling Lakes (the scheme) Scrooby South (the adjoining scheme to the north) Construction Phase: Soils stripped and material Not yet commenced. excavated, soils replaced and area of working restored, including seeding and planting. Year 1 following scheme completion, inclusive Soils stripped and stored mineral being of seeding and planting forming part of scheme extracted and processed through Scrooby development proposals. Top Quarry. Year 15 following scheme completion. New Scheme complete and new landscape landscape fully established. forming part of scheme has over 15 years establishment. Lakes continue to be used for angling. 1.8.2 The existing processing plant at Scrooby Top and other active mineral extraction sites within the study area are part of the baseline conditions and are not cumulative schemes. 3 rpsgroup.com 2 METHODOLOGY 2.1 Relevant Methodological Guidance 2.1.1 The assessment of landscape and visual effects arises within the EIA process essentially through Article 3 of the 1997 Directive (Council Directive 97/11/EC). This assessment has been based on the relevant guidance on landscape and visual assessment. This includes: Landscape Institute and Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (2002) ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment:
Recommended publications
  • Bassetlaw District Local Development Framework Site Allocations Issues

    Bassetlaw District Local Development Framework Site Allocations Issues

    Bassetlaw District Local Development Framework 2012 Site Allocations Issues & Options Consultation Summary Report Site Allocations Issues and Options Consultation Summary Document Table of Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 2 Initial advertising and promotion of the Issues and Options stage ................................... 5 Notification and advertising of the initial consultation period ......................................... 5 Consultation events and meetings .................................................................................... 9 Extension of the formal consultation period, additional events and further promotion of the consultation. .......................................................................................................... 10 3 Bassetlaw District Council Employees ............................................................................. 13 4 Public consultation events ............................................................................................... 14 Beckingham ...................................................................................................................... 14 Blyth ................................................................................................................................. 15 Carlton in Lindrick ............................................................................................................ 17 Clarborough Hayton ........................................................................................................
  • £560,000 LEES, 23 Town Street, Sutton Cum Lound

    £560,000 LEES, 23 Town Street, Sutton Cum Lound

    LEES , 23 Town Street, Sutton cum Lound £560 ,000 LEES, 23 Town Street, Sutton cum Lound, after leaving the town turn right at the base of the railway bridge DINING ROOM 15’4” x 12’4” (4.68m x 3.75m) wi th French doors sign posted Mattersey. You will enter the village of Sutton cum opening to rear garden, fine square arch with decorative Retford, DN22 8PT Lound on Town Street and after passing the shop on the right mouldings, ornate corniced ceiling, radiator hand side Lees will be found a little further on the left hand side. DESCRIPTION Lees is a beautifully appointed and sympathetically extended ACCOMMODATION detached cottage offering generously proportioned family living accommodation of charm. In recent times the property has been RECEPTION HALL hardwood panelled entrance door, ornate cosmetically enhanced. This fine property exudes a traditional corniced ceiling, wood stripped flooring, elegant staircase character hosting such features as ornate cornicing, period ascending to Galleried Landing with spindled balustrade, radiators antique high relief fireplaces, carpenter crafted reclaimed timber accents, mouldings and cabinets. Such features are successfully combined with a comprehensive modern specification including an array of appliances to the breakfasting kitchen, luxuriously appointed en suite bathroom and house bathroom. The specification also includes gas fired central heating. The well planned accommodation is ideal for family occupation allowing informal living, yet also able to facilitate formal entertaining. Without doubt a particular feature of Lees is its position within the heart of this much desired village and its excellent landscape architect designed grounds, in all extending CONSERVATORY “P” SHAPED 26’2” x 16’5” narrowing to 6’6” to approximately 0.34 hectares (0.83 acres) or thereabouts.
  • Team Vicar for St Bartholomew's Sutton-Cum-Lound, All Saints

    Team Vicar for St Bartholomew's Sutton-Cum-Lound, All Saints

    Team Vicar for St Bartholomew’s Sutton-cum-Lound, All Saints Babworth, St John’s Scofton and St Michael’s West Retford, within the Retford Area Team Ministry and within the Deanery of Bassetlaw & Bawtry CONTENTS Introduction page 1 The Parish of St Bartholomew, Sutton cum Lound page 2 The Parish of All Saints, Babworth page 2 The Parish of St John’s, Scofton page 3 The Town of Retford page 4 The Parish of Retford page 5 The Churches of the Parish of Retford – St Michael’s page 6 The Retford Area Team Ministry page 7 Introduction We are looking for an enthusiastic and able Team Vicar who will spend approximately half time ministering among the village communities based around Sutton-cum-Lound, Babworth, and Scofton and half time ministering in the Parish of Retford with responsibility for St Michael’s, West Retford. See the individual church profiles for details of each church. The intention is that the person appointed will exercise elements of traditional parish ministry (Sunday worship and occasional offices etc). However, a significant part of their time will be spent leading on the Growing Disciples element of the diocesan vision to welcome 7,000 new disciples into our churches in the years ahead. As a diocese we are working through the implications of last year’s report produced by the Church of England entitled: ‘Released for Mission – Growing the Rural Church’. We believe this will help us to deliver our vision. The priest appointed will be based in Sutton-cum-Lound whilst working across the parishes.
  • Hydrogeological and Hydrological Impact Assessment

    Hydrogeological and Hydrological Impact Assessment

    UK Coal Operations Limited Proposed extension of time for colliery spoil tipping Environmental Statement operations at Harworth Colliery No. 2 Spoil Heap TECHNICAL APPENDIX 6 – Hydrogeological and Hydrological Impact Assessment Hydrogeological and Hydrological Impact Assessment in support of an extension to Planning Permission for Harworth Colliery No 2 Spoil Heap Report ref: HC/HIA Final June 2013 Report prepared for: UK Coal Mining Ltd Harworth Park Blyth Road HARWORTH DN11 8DB BARKERS CHAMBERS • BARKER STREET • SHREWSBURY • UNITED KINGDOM • S Y 1 1 S B TEL : 01743 355770 FAX: 01743 357771 EMAIL : [email protected] Hydrogeological and Hydrological Impact Assessment in support of an extension to Planning Permission for Harworth Colliery No 2 Spoil Heap Report ref: HC/HIA Final June 2013 For Data Protection L Brown MSc FGS CGeol C C Leake BSc MSc FGS UK Coal Mining Ltd Hydrogeological Impact Assessment: Harworth Colliery No 2 Spoil Heap Final CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives 1 1.3 Data sources 1 1.4 Methodology of investigation 1 2 SITE SETTING 3 2.1 Location 3 2.2 Landform 3 3 BASELINE CONDITIONS 4 3.1 Background 4 3.2 Hydrology 4 3.2.1 Rainfall 4 3.2.2 Watercourses 4 3.2.3 Springs 5 3.2.4 Ponds and waterbodies 5 3.2.5 River flows 5 3.2.6 Surface water abstraction 5 3.2.7 Discharge consents 6 3.2.8 Surface water quality 7 3.3 Landfill sites 7 3.4 Protected sites and areas of ecological interest 8 3.5 Geology 9 3.5.1 Regional 9 3.5.2 Local geology 10 3.6 Hydrogeology 11 3.6.1 Aquifer status and regional context
  • Sutton Cum Lound Neighbourhood Plan (Review)

    Sutton Cum Lound Neighbourhood Plan (Review)

    Sutton cum Lound Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2016-2031 Final Version (Reviewed March 2021) Sutton cum Lound Neighbourhood Plan 2016-2031 Sutton cum Lound Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group on behalf of Sutton cum Lound Parish Council, residents and businesses 1 Sutton cum Lound Neighbourhood Plan 2016-2031 1 Contents 2 What is the Sutton cum Lound Neighbourhood Plan? ................................................................... 4 3 Why do we want a Neighbourhood Plan? ...................................................................................... 5 4 How does this Neighbourhood Plan work within the planning system? ........................................ 6 5 Consultation .................................................................................................................................... 7 6 Status of Projects and Actions ......................................................................................................... 8 7 Sutton cum Lound in context .......................................................................................................... 8 A. The People ...................................................................................................................................... 8 B. Amenities ........................................................................................................................................ 9 C. Economy .......................................................................................................................................... 9
  • Twenty-Fifth Annual Report 1991-92

    Twenty-Fifth Annual Report 1991-92

    NaITINGHAMSHIRE BUILDING PRESERVATION TRUST LIMITED A company limited by guarantee and Registered in England Registration No. 897822 Registered Charity No. 254094 Registered Office: 2 Priory Road, West Bridgford, Nottingham NG2 SHU Telephone: Nottingham 819622 (STD 0602) Twenty-Fifth Annual Report 1991-92 REPORT ON THE YEAR'S ACTIVITIES OffICERS During the year, the Trust has suffered from the effects of the recession, Chairman: Cllr. R.P. Gilbert especially from the fall in property prices and the slump in the housing market. Vi ce-Chairman: Cllr. M.E. Adlington This would be an ideal time to purchase buildings under threat and to invest in Honorary Legal Adviser: Mr. C.P. McKay MA future projects for the revolving fund programme. Honorary Secretary: Mr. G.A. Turner RIBA Ho norary Treasurer: Mr. J. farrer IPfA IRRV Unfortuna tely, the Trust, like many ot·her Building Preserva tion Trusts, is caught in the situation where its capital and money borrowed is tied up in buildings which stand restored but unsold. This six almshouses at St. Leonard's Court, Newark, purchased by the Trust and MEMBERS Of THE COUNCIL Of MANAGEMENT largely financed by a loan from the Architectural Heri t.age Fund, have been restored and refurbished to a high standard. The contribution to the street scene Mrs. C. Atkins (CPRE - Nottinghamshire Branch) in the heart of Newark Town Centre is considerable and represents an excellent Mrs. J. Bennett example of conservation in action. The decision whether to let the properties on Cllr. K. Bullivant (Nottinghamshire County Council) short term leases or to reduce the selling price dramatically has been exercising Mr.
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2018, East Midlands

    Heritage at Risk Register 2018, East Midlands

    East Midlands Register 2018 HERITAGE AT RISK 2018 / EAST MIDLANDS Contents The Register III Nottingham, City of (UA) 66 Content and criteria III Nottinghamshire 68 Criteria for inclusion on the Register V Ashfield 68 Bassetlaw 69 Reducing the risks VII Broxtowe 73 Key statistics XI Gedling 74 Mansfield 75 Publications and guidance XII Newark and Sherwood 75 Key to the entries XIV Rushcliffe 78 Entries on the Register by local planning XVI Rutland (UA) 79 authority Derby, City of (UA) 1 Derbyshire 2 Amber Valley 2 Bolsover 4 Chesterfield 5 Derbyshire Dales 6 Erewash 7 High Peak 8 North East Derbyshire 10 Peak District (NP) 11 South Derbyshire 11 Leicester, City of (UA) 14 Leicestershire 17 Charnwood 17 Harborough 20 Hinckley and Bosworth 22 Melton 23 North West Leicestershire 24 Lincolnshire 25 Boston 25 East Lindsey 27 Lincoln 35 North Kesteven 37 South Holland 39 South Kesteven 41 West Lindsey 45 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 50 North Lincolnshire (UA) 52 Northamptonshire 56 Corby 56 Daventry 56 East Northamptonshire 58 Kettering 61 Northampton 61 South Northamptonshire 62 Wellingborough 65 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2018 / EAST MIDLANDS LISTED BUILDINGS THE REGISTER Listing is the most commonly encountered type of statutory protection of heritage assets. A listed building Content and criteria (or structure) is one that has been granted protection as being of special architectural or historic interest. The LISTING older and rarer a building is, the more likely it is to be listed. Buildings less than 30 years old are listed only if Definition they are of very high quality and under threat.
  • Bassetlaw Heritage at Risk Strategy & Update To

    Bassetlaw Heritage at Risk Strategy & Update To

    Bassetlaw Heritage at Risk Strategy & Update to Heritage at Risk Register – July 2020 Prepared by the Conservation Team July 2020 Document details Title: Bassetlaw District Council: Bassetlaw Heritage At Risk Strategy & Update to Heritage at Risk Register – July 2020. Summary: This document sets out the Council’s strategy to tackle heritage identified as being ‘at risk’, both in the short, medium and long term. Approved: This strategy document, including the updated Heritage at Risk Register, was adopted at Cabinet on 7th July 2020. Document availability: Copies of this document, together with details of heritage ‘at risk’ in general, are available on the Council’s website (www.bassetlaw.gov.uk) or by contacting the Conservation Team by telephone (01909 533427) or email ([email protected]). 2 Foreword Bassetlaw has a rich tapestry of built heritage, spread across the district, covering a vast range of types of buildings and structures, both large and small in scale, many of which are designated. These sites are often in prominent locations and help to establish or reinforce a settlement’s sense of place. In some cases, these ‘heritage assets’ can fall into disrepair, for a variety of reasons. In these circumstances, the buildings and structures are identified as being ‘at risk’. Heritage ‘at risk’ can impact on local communities and the environment in which we live – not only are there the visual signs of neglect, but there can also be social, economic and public safety concerns too. As the Heritage Champion for Bassetlaw District Council, it is my role to raise the profile of built heritage in Bassetlaw, particularly with regard to its care and its future.
  • Idle & Sands, Retford

    Idle & Sands, Retford

    Idle & Sands, Retford Benefice (includes the churches at Babworth and Ranby, Bothamsall, Eaton and Gamston, Elkesley, Scofton with Osberton, Sutton cum Lound & West Drayton) Parish Profile For the post of Vicar February 2021 Welcome We hope that you will enjoy reading though this profile. We love this part of North Nottinghamshire and the people of its village communities. We believe God is at work in our churches and we long that other people might come to faith in Jesus Christ and be a blessing where they live and work. We hope that as you read this profile you will capture something of our hopes and dreams for the future and discern whether you might be our new vicar. CONTENTS Our Diocese Page 2 Our Deanery Page 4 Our New Vicar Page 5 Our Ministry Team Page 6 Our Area Page 6 Our Schools Page 8 Our Vicarage Page 8 Our Churches Page 8 Our Current Worship Pattern Page 13 Our Finances Page 13 Our Mission Statistics Page 14 For more information, please see various relevant links on our Facebook pages. Idle & Sands parish www.facebook.com/Parish-of-Idle-and-Sands-Retford-103196687863553 Eaton & Gamston: www.facebook.com/allsaintseatonandgamston Elkesley: www.facebook.com/ElkesleyStGiles Scofton: www.facebook.com/Scofton-Parish-Church-434076296687730 Sutton-cum-Lound: www.facebook.com/St-Bartholomews-Church-Sutton-cum-Lound-973862712656862 1 Our Diocese THE DIOCESE OF SOUTHWELL & NOTTINGHAM GROWING DISCIPLES WIDER, YOUNGER AND DEEPER A statement from the Bishop of Southwell & Nottingham, the Rt Revd Paul Williams and Archdeacon of Nottingham, the Ven Phil Williams (covering the Archdeaconry of Newark) The Diocese of Southwell and Nottingham incorporates the City of Nottingham, the whole County of Nottinghamshire and five parishes in South Yorkshire.
  • History of Lound, Retford, Nottinghamshire

    History of Lound, Retford, Nottinghamshire

    History of Lound, Retford, Nottinghamshire Lound is a Scandinavian name, being the modern form of the old Norse ‘Lund’, a term denotes a wood or grove. Some indicate it may be a copse in which pagan rites were celebrated. The name is common and there are several instances in Nottinghamshire, such as Haughton Lound, Northlund at Blyth, Eastlund at Trowell and perhaps Birkland of which the suffix has become perverted into ‘land’. Until far into the 13th century this village constantly occurs in records as Lound next to Mattersey and sometimes as Lound upon Idle. Fortunately, for its inhabitants it lies more than a mile from that once badly-flooding river, and its sandy soil preserved it from becoming an unproductive marsh. More commonly, the village is referred to in records, old and new, under the compound name of Sutton-cum-Lound, Sutton being the larger of the two, but unfortunately, the annals of both villages are so intermixed that it is difficult to distinguish between them. The earliest known documentary reference to Lound date back to 986, when like Sutton, it 1 formed part of King Edwy’s large grant of lands to Oskytel, Archbishop of York. By 992 both villages were incorporated among the permanent possessions of the archbishopric and by the time of the Norman Conquest, Sutton and its dependencies, of which Lound was one, had attained some importance. The archbishop was then the largest proprietor, his Sutton manor (estate or territorial unit) included land in Lound, Barnby Moor and Scrooby. Together, they were taxed in 1066 at £8 - no small sum in those days and as Scrooby Palace was not in being.
  • Listed Buildings at Risk in Bassetlaw 2012

    Listed Buildings at Risk in Bassetlaw 2012

    Listed Buildings at Risk in Bassetlaw 2012 BUILDINGS AT RISK REGISTER 2012 AT RISK REGISTER BUILDINGS 2012 LISTED 2 Listed Buildings at Risk in Bassetlaw 2012 Document details Title: Listed Buildings at Risk in Bassetlaw 2012. Summary: This document provide service users with information about how redundant, vulnerable or decay historic buildings and a register of which buildings are currently regarded as being at risk by the Council. Approved: This document was approved by Planning Committee on 6th February 2013 at Retford Town Hall. The document was published on 7th February 2013. Document availability: Copies of the document are available at Bassetlaw District Council Planning Services and on the Council’s website: www.bassetlaw.gov.uk/ Listed Buildings at Risk in Bassetlaw 2012 3 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 4 What is a Building at Risk? 6 What is a listed building? 6 What does a listed building grade indicate? 7 Why produce a Register? 7 What buildings are included in the Register? 8 When is a building taken off the Register? 9 What are the reasons for historic buildings being at risk? 9 How can the District Council ensure that buildings are being restored? 9 What help is available for owners of buildings at risk? 10 2. THE REGISTER 11 Key to the entries 12 Register entries 14 3. STRUCTURES REMOVED FROM THE REGISTER 77 4. REDUCING THE RISKS 89 5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 91 Useful contacts 92 Grants 93 Publications and guidance 93 Heritage at risk on the web 94 Contact us 95 Summary table of listed buildings at risk 95 4 Listed Buildings at Risk in Bassetlaw 2012 1.
  • The State and the Country House in Nottinghamshire, 1937-1967

    The State and the Country House in Nottinghamshire, 1937-1967

    THE STATE AND THE COUNTRY HOUSE IN NOTTINGHAMSHIRE, 1937-1967 Matthew Kempson, BSc. MA. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2006 Abstract This thesis considers the state preservation and use of Nottinghamshire country houses during the mid-twentieth century, from the initiation of mass requisition in 1937 until 1967 when concerns for architectural preservation moved away from the country house. This thesis reviews literature on the landed estate in the twentieth century and the emergence of preservationist claims on the country house. Three substantive sections follow. The first discusses the declining representation of landowners within local governance in Nottinghamshire and the constitution of the County Council, and considers how estate space was incorporated within broadened concerns for the preservation of the historic environment and additionally provided the focus for the implementation of a variety of modern state and non-state functions. The second section considers how changing policy and aesthetic judgements impacted upon the preservation of country houses. Through discussion of Rufford Abbey, Winkburn Hall and Ossington Hall I consider the complexities of preservationist claims and how these conflicted with the responsibilities of the state and the demands of private landowners. The third section considers how estate space became valued by local authorities in the implementation of a variety of new modern educational uses, including the teacher training college at Eaton Hall and a school campus development at Bramcote Hills. The thesis concludes by considering the status of the country house in Nottinghamshire since 1967, and contemporary demands on the spaces considered historically in this study.