Cover Next Page > Cover Next Page >

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cover Next Page > Cover Next Page > cover next page > title: Problems and Perspectives in Religious Discourse : Advaita Vedanta Implications author: Grimes, John. publisher: State University of New York Press isbn10 | asin: 0791417913 print isbn13: 9780791417911 ebook isbn13: 9780585044361 language: English subject Language and languages--Religious aspects, Language and languages--Philosophy, Advaita, Vedanta. publication date: 1994 lcc: BL65.L2G76 1994eb ddc: 200/.14 subject: Language and languages--Religious aspects, Language and languages--Philosophy, Advaita, Vedanta. cover next page > If you like this book, buy it! < previous page cover-0 next page > PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES IN RELIGIOUS DISCOURSE Advaita Vedanta * Implications JOHN GRIMES State University of New York Press < previous page cover-0 next page > If you like this book, buy it! < previous page cover-1 next page > Published by State University of New York Press, Albany © 1994 State University of New York All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information, address State University of New York Press, State University Plaza, Albany, NY 12246 Production by Christine Lynch Marketing by Theresa A. Swierzowski Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Grimes, John, Ph.D. Problems and perspectives in religious discourse: Advaita Vedanta * implications / John Grimes. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7914-1791-3 (alk. paper).: ISBN 0-7914-1792-1 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Language and languagesReligious aspects. 2. Language and languagesPhilosophy. 3. Advaita. 4. Vedanta. I. Title. BL65.L2G76 1994 1994 200'.14dc20 93-18516 CIP 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 < previous page cover-1 next page > If you like this book, buy it! < previous page cover-2 next page > Contents Preface vii vii Special Feature of the Work viii Reasons Theme was Chosen ix Contributions of the Work x Acknowledgments I. Introduction 1 1 The World of Advaita Vedanta * 3 The Problem 6 Two Assertions 7 Religion and Language II. Advaita and Religious Discourse 11 11 Certainty 14 Advaita vis-à-vis Religious Discourse 15 Logic of Religious Discourse 16 Qualifications for Religious Knowledge 18 How Religious Knowledge is Conveyed 20 Advaita vis-à-vis Other Systems 21 The Nature of Religious Discourse 24 Three Assertions 25 Consequences III. Advaita Vedanta*: A Perspective 29 29 What is Advaita Vedanta* 35 Perspective 38 Key Concept IV. Advaita Vedanta* Prospectus 43 43 Religious Discourse The Problem 45 Indirect Approaches 47 The Gap 49 Religious DiscourseIts 'Use' 50 Peculiarities of Religious Discourse 52 The Theme of Advaita Vedanta* 53 Sankara's* Solution 56 Advaita and Language < previous page cover-2 next page > If you like this book, buy it! < previous page page_vi next page > Page vi V. Methods and Perspectives 59 59 Introduction 60 Method 66 Methodology 68 Relation to Epistemology 70 Language and Knowledge 73 BrahmanAtman * 76 BrahmanThe Objective Vision 78 Is the Absolute Known or Not? 81 Atman*The Subjective Vision 83 Atman* is Brahman VI. East and West 85 85 Introduction 90 Part 1 115 Part 2 VII. Advaita's Solution 121 121 Introduction 123 Two Approaches to Religious Discourse 124 Consequences of the Two Approaches 133 Two Levels of Language 135 A Two-Level Theory of Religious Discourse 139 Can the Absolute Be Signified Directly? 146 Second-Level Problems 150 Satkaryavada* and Asatkaryavada* 157 One Level LanguageAbsolute Language 162 Language About the Absolute VIII. Retrospect of Results 169 172 Comment Notes 175 Bibliography 193 Index 207 < previous page page_vi next page > If you like this book, buy it! < previous page page_vii next page > Page vii Preface Special Feature of the Work The present work is an attempt to look at the problem(s) connected with religious discourse in a new light. It proposes a new solution to an ancient problem. 1 It delineates a way of bringing together the dilemma found inherent in religious declarations, both Eastern and Western, with one branch of Indian philosophy, that is, Advaita Vedanta*. Its chief concern is to overcome the "gap" which has rendered religious discourse problematic. Religious discourse attempts to point to, describe, and guide one to the "promised land"whether that be God, the Absolute, heaven, happiness, peace, or however one wants to describe the "goal of life." Such an agenda renders religious statements frought with paradoxes and self-contradictions. Can what is claimed to be inexpressible ever be expressed? Is it possible to believe in that which appears to be inherently contradictory? What do the words used in religious discourse mean and what function(s) do they have? Are they cognitive, factual, and verifiable, or are they noncognitive, non-factual, and unverifiable? This work posits and depicts two paradigmatic approaches to these questions. Either religious discourse refers to an "other" and the approach to this remote and foreign "other" must be through perception or mediated concepts, or, religious discourse refers to the very constitutive being of anything whatsoever and as such is self-evident, immediate, and certain.2 This is not a false dilemma. Either the Divine is somehow totally different from oneself (dvaita or bheda), different-cum-non-different (visistadvaita* or bhedabheda) or non-different (advaita). And even among those systems who advocate non-duality, except for Advaita Vedanta*, there is "some sort" otherness" posited. < previous page page_vii next page > If you like this book, buy it! < previous page page_viii next page > Page viii The former approach postulates a gap between Divinity/God/Reality and the individual while the latter approach emphasizes absolute identity. Most, if not all of the proposed solutions to the problem of religious discourse, both of the West and of the East, fall under the approach to an "other." Advaita's solution declares that religious discourse primarily concerns individuals, here and now, and not a God, above and beyond. Methodologically its analysis commences with empirical existence and culminates in (trans-empirical) essence, declaring that in fact the two are not different. It refers to that which is immediately evident and immanently present 3 (Atman/Brahman*unlike the general approaches to an "other," which, in one degree or another, search "elsewhere.'' Reasons the Theme was Chosen This theme was chosen for a number of reasons. The problem(s) of religious discourse has existed within philosophy for thousands of years and to this day there is no one definitive solution. In fact, the majority of solutions presented are not even viable possibilities,4 being as they are contradictions and inconsistencies.5 Merely because this topic has virtually "run its course'' in current Western academic circles (as the topic of the day) does not in any way lesson this analysis. As far as my knowledge goes, no one has attempted to solve this problem of religious discourse from the perspective of Advaita Vedanta* in a thorough manner. Second, the problem of religious discourse has been a contemporary subject of enquiry, both within the disciplines of Philosophy and Religious Studies. Though the central issue of the debate has currently turned from the question of whether God's existence can be proven,6 it still centers upon the elusive concept of "God" and oft times finds itself wrestling with the non-anthropomorphic Absolute or Ground of Being. In fact, the Absolute (in its non-dual aspect) has become a topic of some fascination in recent years. Finally, this theme allows one to do philosophy with a religious theme. It is still almost a "voice in the wilderness" when < previous page page_viii next page > If you like this book, buy it! < previous page page_ix next page > Page ix the claim is put forward that Indian philosophy is philosophy (or can be presented as pure philosophy on anyone's definition of exactly what philosophy is) and not only, merely, exclusively theology. 7 Indian philosophy is still, in many instances, incorrectly taught in Western circles as something outlandish, sexually oriented, culturally degenerating, unrealistic, quietistic, illusionistic, and/or undesirable. Such teachers do not even suspect that Indian philosophy has an intellectual content.8 Thus, this theme, gives scope for demonstrating how philosophical issues are as relevant to Indian philosophy as religious issuesEast or West. Contributions of the Work The uniqueness of this work and its contributions to philosophy/religious studies are three-fold. First, this thesis proposes that all religious discourse can be interpreted not only as cognitive, but also as valid. This in itself is not a unique claim, but it becomes so when Advaita adds that since the referent of religious discourse is immediately present as the constitutive being of everything whatsoever, and therefore is self-evident and certain, it is fundamental and prior to all proofs which must presuppose it. Yet, it does not presuppose itself as it is the one indubitable fact of experience which can never be denied without self-contradiction. Flew's challenge of falsifiability is met at the empirical (vyavaharika*) level (wherein, according to Advaita, ignorance (avidya*) holds court). But actually, and here is the real uniqueness of Advaita, all language directly and cognitively asserts the Reality. "Those who have eyes can see; those who have ears can hear."
Recommended publications
  • Topic 5. the Nature of Jiva and Isvara. 1. Both Are Reflections. the Reflection of Consciousness in Maya Which Is Indescribable As Real Or Unreal Is Isvara
    Topic 5. The nature of jiva and isvara. 1. Both are reflections. The reflection of consciousness in maya which is indescribable as real or unreal is Isvara. The reflection of consciousness in the infinite number of limited parts of maya, which have avarana and vikshepasakti and which are known as avidya is jiva. The part of maya with both avarana and vikshepa sakti is avidya. This is the view of Prakatarthakara. 2. Mulaprakriti is maya when it is predominantly pure sattva not overcome by rajas and tamas and it is avidya when it is impure sattva subordinated by rajas and tamas. The reflection in maya is Isvara and the reflection in avidya is jiva. This is the view of Swami Vidyaranya in Tattvaviveka, chapter 1 of Panchadasi. 3. Mulaprakriti itself with vikshepasakti being predominant is maya and is the upadhi of Isvara. With avarana sakti being predominent, mulaprakriti is avidya and it is the upadhi of jiva. Because of this, jiva has the experience of being ignorant, but not Isvara. This is the view of some. 4. Samkshepasariraka view—The reflection of consciousness in avidya is Isvara and the reflection in the mind is jiva. In the above views in which Isvara and jiva are reflections, the bimba (prototype) is pure consciousness (Brahman ) which is attained by the liberated. 5. Chitradipa view: Giving up the threefold aspect of Brahman as pure consciousness, Isvara, and jiva, a fourfold aspect is postulated. The reflection in ajnana tinged with the vasanas in the minds of all living beings, which is dependent on Brahman is Isvara.
    [Show full text]
  • Dvaita Vs. Advaita
    > Subject: dvaita vs advaita > I have a very basic question to this very learned group. could someone please > tell us what exactly does dvaita and advaitha mean. kanaka One of the central questions concerning Vedanta philosophers is the relationship of the individual self to the Absolute or Supreme Self. The sole purpose for this question is to determine the nature of contemplative meditation and to determine whether moksha, the state of release, is something worth seeking. The Dvaita school, inaugurated by Madhvacharya (Ananda Tirtha), argues that there is an inherent and absolute five-fold difference in Reality -- between one soul and another, between the soul and God, between God and matter, between the soul and matter, and between matter and matter. These differences are not only individuations, but also inherent qualitative differences, i.e., in its essentially pure state, one individual self is _not_ equal to another in status, but only in genus. Therefore, there are inherently female jIvas, inherently male jIvas, brahmin jIvas, non-brahmin jIvas, and this differentiation exists even in liberation. Consequently, any sort of unity, whether it be mystical or ontological, between the individual self and God is impossible in Dvaita. Hence the term ``Dvaita'' or ``dualism''. Liberation consists of experiencing one's essential nature in parama padam as a reflection of God's glory. Such liberation is achieved through bhakti or loving devotion. The Advaita school, represented in its classical and most powerful form by Sankaracharya, argues that only the Absolute Self exists, _and_ all else is false. The universe and our existence as individuals is not _unreal_, mind you, but a false imposition on a real substrate, the non-dual, undifferentiated principle of consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the 'Desire' Desirable
    IS THE ‘DESIRE’ DESIRABLE (SWAMI SHUDDHABODHANANDA SARASWATI) ……………Continued from previous issue Disciple: Yes guro, but if I am not impertinent, may I ask another question? Guru : Go ahead. Disciple: It is true that the desire is a produced entity whereas saguna-brahma or Isvara is the Creator. Therefore we are told that Bhagavan’s statement ‘I am kaama’ does not mean an equation in the form of ‘Isvara is equal to kaama’. But the sruti itself tells us in the form of an equation: ‘Sarvam Brahman’ (Everything is Brahman). Is there not a contradiction? Guru : My dear, both these statements are from two different standpoints. The statement from the Gita takes for granted the Isvara, jagat and everything that is there in it at the level of vyavahara to describe Isvara’s glories which are useful to mumukshus and devotees in their saadhanaa. But the sruti declarations such as sarvam Brahma’ is only to reveal the immanent (sarvavyapi) nature of Brahman as the basis (adhisthana) of the entire adhyasta jagat. The jagat has no independent existence apart from Brahman. Such sruti statements do not intend to confer the status of nirvikari (changeless) Brahman on the vikari (ever-changing) jagat. The samanadhikaranya (juxtaposition) ‘sarvam Brahma’ is used only for the sake of dissolving Creation (prapancha-pravilapanartham) (Br.Su.bh.1-3-1). The principle is: though the jagat is non-different (ananya)from Brahman on account of the cause-effect relation between the two, the true nature of jagat is Brahman but the true nature of Brahman is not jagat (Br.Su.bh.2-1-9).
    [Show full text]
  • Against a Hindu God
    against a hindu god Against a Hindu God buddhist philosophy of religion in india Parimal G. Patil columbia university press——new york columbia university press Publishers Since 1893 new york chichester, west sussex Copyright © 2009 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Patil, Parimal G. Against a Hindu god : Buddhist philosophy of religion in India / Parimal G. Patil. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-231-14222-9 (cloth : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-0-231-51307-4 (ebook) 1. Knowledge, Theory of (Buddhism) 2. God (Hinduism) 3. Ratnakirti. 4. Nyaya. 5. Religion—Philosophy. I. Title. BQ4440.P38 2009 210—dc22 2008047445 ∞ Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 References to Internet Web sites (URLs) were accurate at the time of writing. Neither the author nor Columbia University Press is responsible for URLs that may have expired or changed since the manuscript was prepared. For A, B, and M, and all those who have called Konark home contents abbreviations–ix Introduction–1 1. Comparative Philosophy of Religions–3 1. Disciplinary Challenges–5 2. A Grammar for Comparison–8 3. Comparative Philosophy of Religions–21 4. Content, Structure, and Arguments–24 Part 1. Epistemology–29 2. Religious Epistemology in Classical India: In Defense of a Hindu God–31 1. Interpreting Nyaya Epistemology–35 2. The Nyaya Argument for the Existence of Irvara–56 3. Defending the Nyaya Argument–69 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction*
    INTRODUCTION | 1 Introduction* Radhavallabh Tripathi IT is almost an impossible task for a single person to present a comprehensive view on the status and trends of Sanskrit studies in a vast country like India. What is being done here would just appear to be a sketchy account, containing snippets of information, that is to be further corroborated, properly analysed and explored. India is divided into 28 states, 7 union territories and 644 districts. There is hardly any district or region where Sanskrit is not studied in some form or the other. Sanskrit is mentioned in the list of 22 major languages, officially accepted in the Constitution of India, and it is also one of the three languages there, that have an all India character. Teaching, Education and Research In India there are 282 universities as per the records with the AIU, at least 112 of which have postgraduate and research departments of Sanskrit. The number of colleges teaching Sanskrit is around 10,000. “Modern methods” are adopted in these institutions for teaching programmes in Sanskrit. Apart from these universities and colleges, there are 16 Sanskrit universities and a number of Sanskrit pÀÇhaœÀlÀs or Sanskrit * This is an enlarged and revised version of my paper “Sanskrit Studies in India” published in the Bulletin of IASS, 2012. 2 | SIXTY YEARS OF SANSKRIT STUDIES: VOL. 1 colleges where traditional method also known as pÀÇhaœÀlÀ paddhati is practised. As per a recent state-wise survey conducted by the Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan (RSkS) the number of Sanskrit pÀÇhaœÀlÀs in Madhya Pradesh is 644, in Chhattisgarh 32, in Uttar Pradesh 1347, Uttarakhand 115, in Karnataka it is 290, in Orissa 433, Punjab 8, Rajasthan 1698, Sikkim 36, Tamil Nadu 55, and in Himachal Pradesh 129, Andhra Pradesh 509, Assam 83, Bihar 717, Goa 4, Gujarat 63, Haryana 74, Jammu & Kashmir 43, Jharkhand 3, Kerala 31, Maharashtra 63, Manipur 8.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Gita Bhashyam
    Sincere Thanks to: Sri Oppiliappan Koil V. Sadagopan Swamy for releasing this eBook in the Godha Series at Sadagopan.Org SrI: Art Work by Sau. R. Chitralekha ” fi À Introduction to tAtparya CandrikA - Bhagavad Gita śAstra avatArikA Dear RasikAs of Srimad Bhagavad GitA: On behalf of the Members of Sri Hayagreeva likhita kaimkarya ghoshThI, it is my bhAgyam as its SampAtakar to release the First of the nineteen e- books as the special samarpNam during the year long celebration of SvAmi Vedanta Desikan’s avatAram at Tooppul in 1268 C.E. The focus of this set of e-books is on Bhagavad Ramanuja’s GitA BhAshyam and SvAmi Desikan’s Commentary on that BhAshyam named tAtparya CandrikA. We will commence this series with an introduction today and seek GitAcAryan’s blessings to have Kaimkarya pUrti on the 2018 PurattAsi SrAvaNam day. There are many BhAshyams for Srimad Bhagavad GitA. From the ViśishTAdvaita darśanam point of view, SvAmi Alavandar’s GitArtha sangraham, Bhagavad Ramanuja’s GitA BhAshyam based on the Sri sUkti of SvAmi Alavandar and SvAmi Desikan’s own GitA BhAshyam elaborating on Bhagavad Ramanuja’s GitA BhAshyam named “tAtparya CandrikA“ are the earliest BhAshyams and have provided the inspiration for subsequent Gita BhAshyams in Sanskrit, MaNipravALam, Kannada and Tamil. It is interesting to note that there are a few English translations and commentaries on GitA BhAshyam of AcArya Ramanuja, where as none exists until now for the word by word meanings and commentaries in English for the insightful GitA BhAshyam/tAtparya CandrikA of SvAmi Desikan Himself. Sri Hayagreeva likhita kaimkarya ghoshThI with the help of VidvAn Sri.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophy of the Panchadasi
    THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE PANCHADASI SWAMI KRISHNANANDA The Divine Life Society Sivananda Ashram, Rishikesh, India Website: www.swami-krishnananda.org ABOUT THIS EDITION Though this eBook edition is designed primarily for digital readers and computers, it works well for print too. Page size dimensions are 5.5" x 8.5", or half a regular size sheet, and can be printed for personal, non-commercial use: two pages to one side of a sheet by adjusting your printer settings. 2 CONTENTS Preface .......................................................................................................... 4 Chapter I: Discrimination of Reality .................................................. 7 Chapter II: Discrimination of the Elements ................................ 29 Chapter III: Discrimination of the Five Sheaths ........................ 44 Chapter IV: Discrimination of Duality ............................................ 53 Chapter V: Discrimination of the Mahavakyas ........................... 65 Chapter VI: Light on the Analogy of a Painted Picture ............ 68 Chapter VII. Light on Supreme Satisfaction ..............................104 Chapter VIII: Light on the Internal Self ........................................136 Chapter IX: Light on Meditation .....................................................149 Chapter X: Light on the Drama Theatre .....................................175 Chapter XI: The Bliss of Yoga ..........................................................180 Chapter XII: The Bliss of the Self ...................................................200
    [Show full text]
  • 1 BLOCK-1 INTRODUCTION the Indian Philosophical Systems Are Classified According As They Accept the Authority of the Vedas Or No
    BLOCK-1 INTRODUCTION The Indian philosophical systems are classified according as they accept the authority of the Vedas or not. The systems of Indian philosophy are classified into two groups: Orthodox Systems and Heterodox Systems. The orthodox systems are: Vaisheshika, Nyaya, Samkhya, Yoga, Purva-Mimamsa, and Uttar-Mimamsa. The orthodox systems form pairs as follows: Nyaya-Vaisheshika, Yoga-Samkhya, Mimamsa-Vedanta. In each of the pairs, the first system is concerned with the practice and the second system focuses on the theoretical aspects. It becomes difficult, sometimes, to name a single founder or a promoter of a system. However, the following are widely acknowledged as proponents of the above systems: Gautama for Nyaya, Kanada for Vaisheshika, Patanjali for Yoga, Kapila for Samkhya, Jaimini for Purva-Mimamsa and Sankara for Uttar-Mimamsa. The present block, consisting of 5 units, introduces Orthodox Systems -I beginning with the Nyaya Philosophy. Unit 1 is on “Nyaya Philosophy.” In this unit, you will learn the Nyāyika’s doctrine of valid sources of knowledge and their arguments on self and liberation. Further, you will also learn the Nayāyika’s views on God. After studying this unit, you should be able to explain different kinds of perception, nature and characteristics of inference, concept of self, views on liberation, and arguments on testimony as a valid source of knowledge Unit 2 highlights the significance of the “Vaiseshika School” in the development of Indian philosophy. In this unit, you will learn the Vaiśeṣika’s arguments on categories, epistemology, God, bondage, and liberation. The School is earlier to Samkhya and contemporary with Jainism and Buddhism.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Isavasyopanishad
    Sincere Thanks To ‘SrI nrsimha seva rasikan’ Oppiliappan Koil SrI VaradAcAri SaThakopan svAmi for hosting this title in his eBook series at www.sadagopan.org Cover Design and eBook assembly: Smt Jayashree Muralidharan www.sadagopan.org Table of contents 1. Foreword by Oppiliappan Koil SrI Varadachari Sadagopan 1 2. ISavasyopanishat - Author’s Introduction 5 3. Mantras of the Upanishat 7 - 9 4. Commentaries for the Mantras 10 - 69 SrI RAmAnujAchArya - Kanchi (Thanks: www.anudinam.org) www.sadagopan.org SrI: Some Reflections on the ISAvAsya upanishat following the ViSishTAdvaita darSanam by Oppiliappan Koil SrI Varadachari Sadagopan *** Dear Aastikaas: It is aDiyEn’s pleasure to release as an eBook, the scholarly commentaries on Upanishads by SrI SrIbhAshyam SrInivAsAchAr svAmi, the sishyar of the great scholar/AcAryan, U.Ve. SrI RaghunAtha TAtAchAr svAmi. aDiyEn is very happy that SrIman SrIbhAshyam SrInivAsAchAryulu svAmi has kindly accepted the likhita kaimkarya team’s request to enrich our ebook series with Upanishadic commentaries following the RAmAnuja darSanam. aDiyEn is privileged to provide a brief summary of this Upanishad belonging to the Kanva samhita of Sukla Yajur Vedam. This profound Upanishad with just 18 mantrams deals most successfully with the three tattvams according to Dr. N.S.AnantharangAchar svAmi: (1) The nature of the Supreme Brahman (2) the nature of the means to realization and (3) the nature of the parama purushArtham (the supreme goal of life). These 18 mantrams in turn are viewed as belonging to four distinct sub-groups as classified by Vedanta Vidwan, Dr. N.S.AnantarangAchar svAmi: 1. Mantras 1 and 2 make up the first group; they serve as an introduction to Atma Vidya and the essence of Karma Yoga taught in great detail to the confused Arjuna by Lord PArthasArati in the battle field of Kuru kshetra.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophy of the Panchadasi by Swami Krishnananda 2 PREFACE
    TTHHEE PPHHIILLOOSSOOPPHHYY OOFF TTHHEE PPAANNCCHHAADDAASSII by Swami Krishnananda The Divine Life Society Sivananda Ashram, Rishikesh, India (Internet Edition: For free distribution only) Website: www.swami-krishnananda.org CONTENTS Preface 3 1. Discrimination Of Reality 5 2. Discrimination Of The Elements 15 3. Discrimination Of The Five Sheaths 22 4. Discrimination Of Duality 26 5. Discrimination Of The Mahavakyas 32 6. Light On The Analogy Of A Painted Picture 34 7. Light On Supreme Satisfaction 50 8. Light On The Internal Self 64 9. Light On Meditation 70 10. Light On The Drama Theatre 82 11. The Bliss Of Yoga 85 12. The Bliss Of The Self 94 13. The Bliss Of Non-Duality 101 14. The Bliss Of Knowledge 111 15. The Bliss Of Objects 116 The Philosophy of the Panchadasi by Swami Krishnananda 2 PREFACE The Panchadasi is a standard text on the philosophy of the Vedanta, consisting of fifteen chapters, written by Sage Vidyaranya. Historians and teachers of philosophy sometimes hold that the later portions of this work were written by Bharatitirtha. Whatever be the authorship of this treatise, it stands as an unparalleled compendium expounding the fundamental principles of the Vedanta propounding the non-dual existence of Brahman, the supremacy of the Absolute. In accordance with the accepted definition of the Ultimate Reality as Sat-Chit-Ananda (Existence-Knowledge-Bliss), the fifteen chapters of the Panchadasi are grouped into three sections of five chapters each, which are designated as Viveka, or Discrimination, Dipa, or Illumination, and Ananda, or Bliss, corresponding to the Existence, Consciousness and Bliss aspects of Reality, which is the theme of the fifteen chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Visistadvaita a Philosophy of Religion
    Visistadvaita A Philosophy of Religion K.R.Paramahamsa 1 Dedicated to the Being of Sri Sathya Sai TAT Embodied 2 3 Table of Contents Page No Preface 7 1. Visistadvaita - A Darsana 11 2. The Theory of Knowledge 19 General 19 Dharmabhuta-jnaana(Phenomenological Consciousness) 24 Svarupa-jnaana(Existential Consciousness) & Dharmabhuta-jnaana (Phenomenological Consciousness)-Interrelationship 31 3. The Theory of Judgment 36 4. The Theory of Relations 41 5. Truth, Error and Avidya 46 Truth 46 Error 49 Avidya 54 6. Saguna Brahman 62 The Brahman as Adhara 74 The Brahman as Satya 79 The Brahman as Jnaana 83 The Brahman as Ananta 91 The Brahman as Bhuvana Sundara 96 The Brahman as Saririn 110 The Brahman as Sesin 121 The Brahman as Niyantr 128 The Brahman as Redeemer 141 7. Cosmology 157 8. The Psychology of Jivatman 162 9. Mukti-Mumuksutva 170 Mukti 170 Mumuksutva 181 4 5 10.Ways to Salvation 185 Preface Karma-yoga 185 Jnaana-yoga 189 Visistadvaita, as a philosophy of religion, not only interprets Bhakti-yoga 195 metaphysics in terms of religion, and religion in terms of Prapatti-yoga 204 metaphysics, but equates the two by the common designation 11.The Mysticism of Visistadviata 216 darsana. Darsana connotes a Vedanta philosophical system as 12.The Theology of Srivaisnavism 223 well as spiritual perception of Reality, and may be explained as an 13.Srivaisnavism of Visistadvaita 231 integral intuition of the Brahman. 14.Evolution of Vaisnavism 240 Narayana-Visnu 240 In extreme monism, the Brahman is jnaana and is realized Sankarsana-Baladeva 246 by jnaana.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter V Jiva and Brahma^T
    CHAPTER V JIVA AND BRAHMA^T 151 CHAPTSR V JIVA AND BRAHMAN In the preceding chapter we considered in broad outline the way Vacaspati. understands the nature of 3rahinan and Jagat, and the pattern of relationship between I them. We also outlined the way SaAkara presents his account of them. This was done to present the fundamentally contrastive features anthem to enable the concerned to see that the former cannot be taken to be either extension of I the latter or to which Sankara's philosophy inevitably leads. In fact we argued that Vacaspati's account of Brahman, Jagat and relationship between them would not have been so different I from that of Sahara's# were he not influenced by sane t post-Sankara Advaitins on the one hand and some non-Advaitic trends of thought on the other. This means that Vacaspati's account under consideration takes the sort of shape it does I through his attempt to combine Sankara's Advaita and some post-Sankara Advaita trends and/or some non-Advaitic influences on him which he could not sever his relation from, as he was susceptible to them through his having written number of works pertaining to them. In this chapter we intend to consider Vacaspati's account of the nature of Jiva and its relation with Brahman to bring to the notice of the concerned some 152 important tenets of them and their marked differences with the account of Jiva and its relation with Brahman as given by Sankara. This would give us another clue to consider to what extent/ if at all, Vacaspati's Advalta could t>e said I to be an extension of Sankara's.
    [Show full text]