Estimating Prey Size and Number in Crayfish-Eating Snakes, Genus Regina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Estimating Prey Size and Number in Crayfish-Eating Snakes, Genus Regina Herpetologíca, 40(1), 1984, 82-88 © 1984 by The Herpetologists' League, Inc. ESTIMATING PREY SIZE AND NUMBER IN CRAYFISH-EATING SNAKES, GENUS REGINA J. S. GODLEY, R. W. McDiARMID, AND N. N. ROJAS ABSTRACT: Snakes of the genus Regina feed almost exclusively on crayfish. The paired, sym- metrical gastroliths of crayfish are not digested and are detectable from x-rays of the snake. Gastrolith length is directly proportional to carapace length and can be obtained from x-rays. Carapace length can be converted to kcal of ingested energy. Using these relationships and repeated captures of radio-telemetered Regina, estimates of food consumption and energy intake by free- living snakes are feasible. New information on prey selectivity, feeding behavior, and predator- prey size relations in Regina grahami and R. septemvittata are presented and compared with similar data for other snakes. Key words: Reptilia; Serpentes; Colubridae; Regina; Food habits; Predator-prey size relation- ships; Crayfish THE foraging ecology of snakes is less ing of specific events in the crayfish molt often studied than many aspects of snake cycle and the relationship of these events biology. Some species are rare and others to prey selection in R. grahami and R. are secretive; consequently, obtaining ad- septemvittata. Briefly, individuals of var- equate samples is a common problem ious species of crayfish molt one to 12 times (Turner, 1977). In addition, most snakes per year depending upon sex, age and en- eat relatively large prey at infrequent in- vironment. Usually less than 15% of a tervals (e.g.. Beavers, 1976; Fitch, 1960, population is molting at any one time (Ca- 1965; Godley, 1980; Greene, 1983a,fe; pelli and Magnuson, 1975; Drach, 1939; Schoener, 1977; Seib, 1981), and their Prins, 1968; Stein, 1977; Stevenson, 1975). digestive tracts seldom contain food. Be- Prior to molt, calcium is extracted from cause of the prey's advanced state of the exoskeleton and stored in paired, sym- digestion in the hindgut (Brown, 1958; metrical gastroliths located in the cardiac Godley, 1980; Henderson, 1970; Skoczy- stomach (McWhinnie, 1962; Richards, las, 1970), positive identification of prey 1951; Stein and Murphy, 1976; Travis, species and important measures of prey 1960). The gastroliths are resorbed shortly size often are obtainable only while the after molt and contribute to the formation prey is in the snake's stomach. of a new exoskeleton. Gastroliths reappear Here we describe an accurate, non-in- upon initiation of the next molt cycle. vasive technique for estimating the num- Gastrolith growth and résorption are dis- ber and sizes of prey in the entire diges- tinct events and are tightly synchronized tive tracts of crayfish-eating snakes, genus with other identifiable stages in the molt Regina. The technique is designed specif- cycle (McWhinnie, 1962; Stevenson, 1975). ically for dietary studies of R. grahami As we shall show, these gastroliths provide and R. septemvittata, two species that feed a convenient, quantitative "marker" for almost exclusively on soft, freshly molted estimating rates of feeding and energy in- crayfish (Branson and Baker, 1974; Burg- take in R. grahami and R. septemvittata, hardt, 1968; Hall, 1969; Kofron, 1978; and perhaps in other species that feed ex- Mushinsky and Hebrard, 1977; Strecker, tensively on molting crayfish (Neill, 1951; 1926; Wood, 1949). We also provide new Penn, 1950). information on prey selectivity, feeding behavior, and predator-prey size relations MATERIALS AND METHODS in these species and summarize similar We estimated the number, size and data for other species of snakes. feeding sequence of crayfish ingested by The technique requires an understand- 36 R. grahami (USNM 12864-65, 12891, 82 March 1984] HERPETOLOGICA 83 12940-70, 13038-39) from New Orleans, were examined after dissection measure- Orleans Parish, Louisiana, and two ments were recorded. Because methods (197638) from Badger Lake, Monona varied between the snake species, results County, Iowa, by exposing identifiable are presented separately. prey with a single ventro-medial incision through the gut wall. The orientation RESULTS (head or abdomen first) and the ingestion position (dorsal, ventral or lateral) of the Regina grahami crayfish relative to the snake's skull were Only the remains of crayfish, repre- recorded prior to removal of prey from senting at least three species, Orconectes the snake's stomach. After removal, the palmeri croelanus (Creaser), Procamba- crayfish's carapace length (CL = maxi- rus clarkii (Girard) and P. vioscai (Penn), mum dorsal midline distance from tip of were recovered from the stomachs of 38 rostrum to posterior edge of carapace) and R. grahami. Of these prey, measurements gastrolith length (GL = maximum longi- of both GL and CL were obtainable from tudinal length of gastroliths) were mea- 17 crayfish (all were in molt stages Ai or sured with vernier calipers to the nearest early Aj), CL only from two crayfish (one 0.1 mm. Only GL was obtained from in- in stage B, the other in stage Aj or As but testinal contents; paired, symmetrical gas- gastroliths broken during processing), GL troliths were assumed to represent the di- only from six crayfish (all in stages Ai or gested remains of a single crayfish. The As but carapace partially digested), and molt stage of the crayfish (Drach, 1939; two crayfish were represented only by sin- McWhinnie, 1962; Stevenson, 1975) also gle, very large (57 and 63 mm total length) was recorded. Molt stages pertinent to this chaela, each in a different snake. The study are as follows. A;•Exoskeleton is largest chaela from an intact crayfish soft, gelatinous and easily torn; gastrolith (CL = 31.5 mm) in the sample was 36.0 is fully formed; duration is of a few hours. mm, suggesting that the latter two snakes Aj•Exoskeleton is leathery; gastrolith is encountered crayfish too large to consume reduced to about 50% of former size by whole and instead removed the only large end of stage; duration is ca. 24 h. B• portion (chaela) that could be disarticu- Rostrum and cephalic carapace are firmer lated. In addition, GL measurements from but flexible; gastrolith is very small to ab- 20 crayfish were obtained from intestinal sent at end of stage; duration is of one to contents. All of these crayfish appeared to three days. have been in molt stage Ai or early A2. Similar data were obtained from a se- Although most of the exoskeletons of ries of 36 R. septemvittata collected in crayfish were partially digested, the gas- Montgomery Co., Ohio (USNM 128974- troliths seemed normal and unaffected by 98, 129016-27). However, before dissec- passage through the snake's digestive tract. tion, each specimen was radiographed in In fact, captives of all species of Regina dorso-ventral view. The radiographs were defecate gastroliths which macroscopical- exposed for 30 s at instrument readings of ly are indistinguishable from those dis- 5 mamp and between 20 and 23 kV de- sected from live crayfish of a similar molt pending on snake size. Gastrolith mea- stage (J. S. Godley, personal observation). surements were taken from the radio- As is typical of freshly molted crayfish graphs with a dial caliper. Because (McWhinnie, 1962 for Orconectes virilis), gastroliths are slightly oblong in shape and GL is a linear function of CL (Fig. 1) and the x-rays provided only a single plane of provides an excellent estimate of crayfish view, the longest dimension of either gas- size. Most of the variance about this line trolith of the pair was chosen to represent probably is caused by three sources of ex- the GL. To avoid possible bias, GL mea- perimental error: (1) differences in GL: surements taken from the radiographs CL ratios among the three species of cray- 84 HERPETOLOGICA [Vol. 40, No. 1 food, 14 contained one crayfish, six had two crayfish each, two contained three, Y.0.157X-0.5S2 • 5,0 and three had eaten four crayfish. SVL Ê r = 0.8 8 0 was positively correlated with the total E number of prey whether individuals with empty digestive tracts were included (Spearman rank correlation, r^ = 0.47; P = 0.0076, n = 38) or excluded (r, = 0.58, P = 0.0024, n = 25) from the analysis. Prey orientation could be determined for 26 of 27 crayfish recovered from the R. grahami stomachs; 12 were ingested head first and 14 abdomen first, suggest- 20 30 Carapace Length (mm) ing no orientation preference (x^ = 0.08, F > 0.75). Vertical position of prey could FIG. 1.•Relationship of gastrolith length and car- be determined for 22 of the 27 prey and apace length from 17 crayfish removed from the was not significantly different from ran- stomachs of Regina grahami. dom (x' = 4.0, 2 df, F > 0.10) with 12 crayfish ingested on their side with re- spect to the snake's skull, eight with ven- fish represented in the sample, (2) differ- ters up, and two with venters down. Anal- ences in crayfish molt stage, and (3) the ysis of covariance with GL as the difficulties of accurately measuring the CL dependent variable, SVL as the covariate, of soft-bodied crayfish taken from a and prey orientation and position as in- snake's stomach. In a sample of 18 Pro- dependent variables showed no significant cambarus fallax from Hillsborough Co., effects for the latter two variables. Florida, which were sacrificed within six h of molting, the correlation coefficient Regina septemvittata between GL and CL was 0.98 (J. S. God- In this species, specimens were x-rayed ley, unpublished data). The slope of this prior to dissection to determine if radio- line was not significantly different from graphs could provide reliable estimates of that shown in Fig. 1 (F^ai = 2.48, F = feeding activity.
Recommended publications
  • Biosearch 2008 Report
    Scientific Exploration of the Nyika National Park, Malawi 2008 Edited by C.P. and M.J. Overton Scientific Exploration of the Nyika National Park, Malawi, Central Africa 2008 Edited by C. P. & M. J. Overton 1 Printed and published by Biosearch Nyika Wayfarer Lodge, Welbourn, Lincs LN5 0QH Tel: 01400 273323 e-mail:[email protected] www.biosearch.org.uk Price £15.00 © April 2009, Biosearch Nyika C.P. & M. J. Overton Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of the Publishers. Reference: Overton, C.P. & M.J. (ed.) 2008 Scientific Exploration of the Nyika National Park, Malawi 2008 Wayfarer Lodge, Welbourn, Lincolnshire, UK LN5 0QH Cover photographs; front and back by Marianne Overton 2 CONTENTS Foreword Peter Overton 5 Maps Hilary Strickland and Sophie Martin 7 Leader report Peter Overton 11 Expedition Team Personal submissions 25 Provisions Peter Overton 31 Cameras in the field Ian Pilcher 35 Temperatures Kaele Pilcher 39 Women in Malawi Laura Humphries 41 Birds Peter Overton and Richard Nyirenda 45 Herpetology Shaun Allingham and Michael Overton 51 Photo pages List with credits 63 Bats Kaele and Ian Pilcher 77 Poaching Bridget Starling 85 Large mammals Katie Cottrell and Philippa Stubbs 95 Plant communities Steven Mphamba and Martin Preston 131 Medicinal Plants Imran Khan and Lewis Mtumbuka 123 Expedition Song Philippa Stubbs 141 Memories of Africa 143 Biosearch Team Photo 145 Artwork Sophie Martin 147 3 4 FOREWORD Peter Overton The 2008 Expedition was the latest in a series that has run since 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • KEFENOKEE NATIONAL WILDLI Waycross, Georgi
    KEFENOKEE NATIONAL WILDLI Waycross, Georgi (Left to rib _ .4, l, 1 , L, .-- enrollee Robin DeMuro (Staff) 1981 (Left to right) 7, 6, 9, 8 (Staff) 1981 (Left to right) 10, 3 (Staff) 1981 (Left to right) Back Row : 4, 18, 16, 5, 15 ; Front Row : 12, 23, 17 (Staff) 1981 a Flanks Lake - 11 (Staff) 1981 (Left to right) On Wagon : 19, 22 ; On Ground : 21, 20 (Staff) 1981 PERSONNEL 1 . John R . Eadie (EOD 08/07/72) Refuge Manager (GS 13, PFT) 2 . Lloyd A . Culp, Jr . (EOD 12/04/78) Asst . Refuge Manager (GS 11, PFT) 3 . Royce R . Huber (EOD 12/30/79) Asst . Refuge Manager (GS 9, PFT) 4 . Ronald A . Phernetton (EOD 01/09/74) Forester (GS 11, PFT) 5 . Tony R. Gooch (EOD 08/18/80) Forestry Technician (GS 5, Career- Seasonal) 6 . James A . Burkhart (EOD 06/11/78) Chief Outdoor Recreation Planner (GS 11, PFT) 7 . William C . Kent (EOD 06/03/79) Outdoor Recreation Planner (GS 7, PFT) 8 . Norman T . Lindsay (EOD 04/23/79) Outdoor Recreation Planner (GS 7, PFT) 9 . Thomas Worthington (EOD 10/07/79) Outdoor Recreation Planner (GS 7, PFT) 10 . Douglas E . Nuss (EOD 01/16/77) Biological Technician (GS 8, PFT) 11 . Augustus H . Saville (EOD 07/22/80) Biological Technician (GS 7, PFT) 12 . Omer L . Bowen (EOD 03/11/63) Biological Technician (GS 8, PFT) 13 . Cecile Davis (EOD 10/16/72) Administrative Clerk (GS 6, PFT) 14 . Dartha Pittman MOD 12/06/76) Clerk-Stenographer (CS 5, PPT) 15 . Jay Burch (EOD 12/07/61) Maintenance Mechanic (WG 9, PFT) 16 .
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist and Provisional Conservation Status of Namibian Reptiles
    Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 1 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST AND PROVISIONAL CONSERVATION STATUS OF NAMIBIAN REPTILES MICHAEL GRIFFIN BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM PRIVATE BAG 13306 WINDHOEK NAMIBIA Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 2 Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 3 CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 5 INTRODUCTION 5 METHODS AND DEFINITIONS 6 SPECIES ACCOUNTS Genus Crocodylus Nile Crocodile 11 Pelomedusa Helmeted Terrapin 11 Pelusios Hinged Terrapins 12 Geochelone Leopard Tortoise 13 Chersina Bowsprit Tortoise 14 Homopus Nama Padloper 14 Psammobates Tent Tortoises 15 Kinixys Hinged Tortoises 16 Chelonia GreenTurtle 16 Lepidochelys Olive Ridley Turtle 17 Dermochelys Leatherback Turtle 17 Trionyx African Soft-shelled Turtle 18 Afroedura Flat Geckos 19 Goggia Dwarf Leaf-toed Geckos 20 Afrogecko Marbled Leaf-toed Gecko 21 Phelsuma Namaqua Day Gecko 22 Lygodactylus Dwarf Geckos 23 Rhoptropus Namib Day Geckos 25 Chondrodactylus Giant Ground Gecko 27 Colopus Kalahari Ground Gecko 28 Palmatogecko Web-footed Geckos 28 Pachydactylus Thick-toed Geckos 29 Ptenopus Barking Geckos 39 Narudasia Festive Gecko 41 Hemidactylus Tropical House Geckos 41 Agama Ground Agamas 42 Acanthocercus Tree Agama 45 Bradypodion Dwarf Chameleons 46 Chamaeleo Chameleons 47 Acontias Legless Skinks 48 Typhlosaurus Blind Legless Skinks 48 Sepsina Burrowing Skinks 50 Scelotes Namibian Dwarf Burrowing Skink 51 Typhlacontias Western Burrowing Skinks 51 Lygosoma Sundevall’s Writhing Skink 53 Mabuya Typical Skinks 53 Panaspis Snake-eyed Skinks 60 Annotated
    [Show full text]
  • Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge Amphibians, Fish, Mammals and Reptiles List
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge Amphibians, Fish, Mammals and Reptiles List The Okefenokee swamp is covered with Mammals ___Seminole Bat cypress, blackgum, and bay forests (Lasiurus seminolus). A common bat of scattered throughout a flooded prairie ___Virginia Opossum the Okefenokee which is found hanging in made of grasses, sedges, and various (Didelphis virginiana pigna). Common on Spanish Moss during the day. the swamp edge and the islands within aquatic plants. The peripheral upland and ___Hoary Bat the almost 70 islands within the swamp the Swamp. A night prowler. “Pogo” is often seen by campers. (Lasiurus cinereus cinereus). This are forested with pine interspersed with yellowish-brown bat flies high in the air hardwood hammocks. Lakes of varying ___Southern Short-Tailed Shrew late at night and will hang in trees when sizes and depths, and floating sections (Barina carolinensis). A specimen was resting. It is the largest bat in the East of the peat bed, are also part of the found on Floyds Island June 12, 1921. It and eats mostly moths. Okefenokee terrain. kills its prey with poisonous saliva. ___Northern Yellow Bat People have left their mark on the swamp. ___Least Shrew (Lasiurus intermedius floridanus). A 12-mile long canal was dug into the (Cryptotus parva parva). Rarely seen but Apparently a rare species in the area. It eastern prairies in the 1890’s in a failed probably fairly common. Specimens have likes to feed in groups. attempt to drain the swamp. During the been found on several of the islands, on early 1900’s large amounts of timber were the swamp edge, and in the pine woods ___Evening Bat removed, so that very few areas of virgin around the swamp.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Sebastian River Preserve State Park
    St. Sebastian River Preserve State Park Advisory Group Draft Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks June 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ............................................................................... 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN .................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW .................................................. 8 Management Authority and Responsibility ............................................. 8 Park Management Goals ..................................................................... 9 Management Coordination .................................................................. 9 Public Participation .......................................................................... 10 Other Designations .......................................................................... 10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT .................................... 16 Natural Resources ........................................................................... 16 Topography ................................................................................. 16 Geology .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Journal of Herpetology ISSN 1836-5698 (Print)1 Issue 12, 30 April 2012 ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Australasian Journal of Herpetology
    Australasian Journal of Herpetology ISSN 1836-5698 (Print)1 Issue 12, 30 April 2012 ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Australasian Journal of Herpetology Hoser 2012 - Australasian Journal of Herpetology 9:1-64. Available online at www.herp.net Contents on pageCopyright- 2. Kotabi Publishing - All rights reserved 2 Australasian Journal of Herpetology Issue 12, 30 April 2012 Australasian Journal of Herpetology CONTENTS ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) A New Genus of Coral Snake from Japan (Serpentes:Elapidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 3-5. A revision of the Asian Pitvipers, referred to the genus Cryptelytrops Cope, 1860, with the creation of a new genus Adelynhoserea to accommodate six divergent species (Serpentes:Viperidae:Crotalinae). Raymond T. Hoser, 6-8. A division of the South-east Asian Ratsnake genus Coelognathus (Serpentes: Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 9-11. A new genus of Asian Snail-eating Snake (Serpentes:Pareatidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 10-12-15. The dissolution of the genus Rhadinophis Vogt, 1922 (Sepentes:Colubrinae). Raymond T. Hoser, 16-17. Three new species of Stegonotus from New Guinea (Serpentes: Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 18-22. A new genus and new subgenus of snakes from the South African region (Serpentes: Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 23-25. A division of the African Genus Psammophis Boie, 1825 into 4 genera and four further subgenera (Serpentes: Psammophiinae). Raymond T. Hoser, 26-31. A division of the African Tree Viper genus Atheris Cope, 1860 into four subgenera (Serpentes:Viperidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 32-35. A new Subgenus of Giant Snakes (Anaconda) from South America (Serpentes: Boidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 36-39.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68 (2013) 425–431
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68 (2013) 425–431 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Testing monophyly without well-supported gene trees: Evidence from multi-locus nuclear data conflicts with existing taxonomy in the snake tribe Thamnophiini ⇑ John David McVay a, , Bryan Carstens b a Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, 202 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, United States b Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 318 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States article info abstract Article history: Ideally, existing taxonomy would be consistent with phylogenetic estimates derived from rigorously ana- Received 6 October 2012 lyzed data using appropriate methods. We present a multi-locus molecular analysis of the relationships Revised 19 April 2013 among nine genera in the North American snake tribe Thamnophiini in order to test the monophyly of the Accepted 22 April 2013 crayfish snakes (genus Regina) and the earth snakes (genus Virginia). Sequence data from seven genes Available online 9 May 2013 were analyzed to assess relationships among representatives of the nine genera by performing multi- locus phylogeny and species tree estimations, and we performed constraint-based tests of monophyly Keywords: of classic taxonomic designations on a gene-by-gene basis. Estimates of concatenated phylogenies dem- Monophyly onstrate that neither genera are monophyletic, and this inference is supported by a species tree estimate, Regina Virginia though the latter is less robust. These taxonomic findings were supported using gene tree constraint tests Liodytes and Bayes Factors, where we rejected the monophyly of both the crayfish snakes (genus Regina) and the Haldea earth snakes (genus Virginia); this method represents a potentially useful tool for taxonomists and phy- Stepping stone sampling logeneticists when available data is less than ideal.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles & Amphibians
    AWF FOUR CORNERS TBNRM PROJECT : REVIEWS OF EXISTING BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION i Published for The African Wildlife Foundation's FOUR CORNERS TBNRM PROJECT by THE ZAMBEZI SOCIETY and THE BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR AFRICA 2004 PARTNERS IN BIODIVERSITY The Zambezi Society The Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P O Box HG774 P O Box FM730 Highlands Famona Harare Bulawayo Zimbabwe Zimbabwe Tel: +263 4 747002-5 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.biodiversityfoundation.org Website : www.zamsoc.org The Zambezi Society and The Biodiversity Foundation for Africa are working as partners within the African Wildlife Foundation's Four Corners TBNRM project. The Biodiversity Foundation for Africa is responsible for acquiring technical information on the biodiversity of the project area. The Zambezi Society will be interpreting this information into user-friendly formats for stakeholders in the Four Corners area, and then disseminating it to these stakeholders. THE BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR AFRICA (BFA is a non-profit making Trust, formed in Bulawayo in 1992 by a group of concerned scientists and environmentalists. Individual BFA members have expertise in biological groups including plants, vegetation, mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, insects, aquatic invertebrates and ecosystems. The major objective of the BFA is to undertake biological research into the biodiversity of sub-Saharan Africa, and to make the resulting information more accessible. Towards this end it provides technical, ecological and biosystematic expertise. THE ZAMBEZI SOCIETY was established in 1982. Its goals include the conservation of biological diversity and wilderness in the Zambezi Basin through the application of sustainable, scientifically sound natural resource management strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecological Characterization of the Tampa Bay Watershed
    Biological Report 90(20) December 1990 An Ecological Characterization of the Tampa Bay Watershed Fish and Wildlife Service and Minerals Management Service u.s. Department of the Interior Chapter 6. Fauna N. Scott Schomer and Paul Johnson 6.1 Introduction on each species, as well as the limited scope.of this document, often excludes such information from our Generally speaking, animal species utilize only a discussion. Where possible, references to more limited number of habitats within a restricted geo­ detailed infonnation on local fish and wildlife condi­ graphic range. Factors that regulate habitat use and tions are included. geographic range include the behavior, physiology, and anatomy ofthe species; competitive, trophic, and 6.2 Invertebrates symbiotic interactions with other species; and forces that influence species dispersion. Such restrictions may be broad, as in the ca.<re of the common crow, 6.2.1 Freshwater Invertebrates which prospers in a wide variety of settings over a Data on freshwater invertebrate communities in va.')t geographic area; or narrow as in the case of the the Tampa Bay area are reported by Cowen et a1. mangrove terrapin, which is found in only one habitat (1974) in the lower Hillsborough River, Cowell et aI. and only in the near tropics of the western hemi­ (1975) in Lake Thonotosassa; Dames and Moore sphere. Knowledge of animal-species occurrence (1975) in the Alafia and Little Manatee Rivers; and within habitat') is fundamental to understanding and Ross and Jones (1979) at numerous locations within managing
    [Show full text]
  • COLUBRIDAE Regina Baird and Girard
    REPTILIA: SQUAMATA: COLUBRIDAE n p~ ~~ - Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. short, semiaquatic, somewhat fossorial crayfish predators. Adult females are generally longer and stouter than adult males. Adult Ernst, C.H., J.W. Gibbons, and M.E. Dorcas. 2002. Regina. females have 118-178 ventrals. 47-87 subcaudals, and shorter tails that comprise 16-30% of body length. The shorter, more Regina Baird and Girard slender males have 110-175 ventrals, 55-89 subcaudals, and Crayfish Snakes longer tails that comprise 17.5-34.0% of body length. The short head is slightly distinct from the neck, and comprises only 3.8- Regina Baird and Girard 1853:45. Type species, Coluher sep- 5.6% of body length. The nares are small and dorsolareral. Eye temvirratus Say 1825; designated by the International Com- diameter is 1417% of head length; the pupil is usually small, mission on Zoological Nomenclature (1962:145). and makes up about 24-50% of eye diameter in adults (Rossman Liodytes Cope 1885: 194. Type species, Helicops alleni Garman 1963). The nasal scale is partially divided by the naris, and the 1874. internasal scales are narrowed anteriorly (R.alleni has only one internasal scale). Present are a single loreal scale, 1-3 preoculars, CONTENT. Currently, four extant species, Regina alleni, R. 2-4 postoculars, I + 2(1-3) temporals, 6-9 supralabials, and 8- grahamii, R. rigidn, and R. septemvittata, and one fossil species, I I infralabials. The parietal scales may extend ventrolaterally R. intermedia, are recognized, but a possible second fossil between the postoculars and anterior temporal to narrowly touch species, Natrix hillmani, may also belong to Regina (see Fossil the supralabials in some R.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads; (2) Reduced Number of Modem Telephone Lines at the Refuge; (3) Reduced Costs to Service Due to Decreased Calls Into the Service Modem Pool
    REVIEW AND APPROVALS OKEFENOKEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE FOLKSTON, GEORGIA ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 2000 Refuge Manager ^ / Date Refuge Supervisor, Area HI / Date Chief of Refuges Date TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION iii HIGHLIGHTS iv CLIMATIC CONDITIONS v MONITORING AND STUDIES 1 l.a. Surveys and Censuses 1 l.b. Studies and Investigation 18 HABITAT RESTORATION 24 2.a. Wetland Restoration: On-refuge 24 2.b. Upland Restoration: On-refuge 24 2.c. Wetland Restoration: Off-refuge 24 2.d. Upland Restoration: Off-refuge 24 HABITAT MANAGEMENT 25 3.a. Water Level Management 25 3.b. Moist Soil Management 29 3.c. Graze/Mow/Hay 29 3.d. Farming 29 3.e. Forest Management 29 3.£ Fire Management 40 3.g. Control Pest Plants 52 FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 53 4.a. Bird Banding 53 4.b. Disease Monitoring and Treatment 53 4.c. Reintroductions 53 4.d. Nest Structures 53 4.e. Pest, Predator and Exotic Animal Control 53 COORDINATION ACTIVITIES 54 5.a. Interagency Coordination 54 5.b. Tribal Coordination 54 5.c. Private Land Activities (excluding restoration) 54 5.d. Oil and Gas Activities 58 5.e. Cooperative/Friends Organizations 58 -i- RESOURCE PROTECTION 60 6.a. Law Enforcement 60 6.b. Wildfire Preparedness 61 6.c. Permits & Economic Use Management 61 6.d. Contaminant Investigation and Cleanup 62 6.e. Water Rights Management 62 6.f Cultural Resource Management 62 6.g. Federal Facility Compliancy Act 62 6.h. Land Acquisition 62 6.L Wilderness and Natural Areas 62 6.j. Threats and Conflicts 62 ALASKA ONLY 63 PUBLICEDUCATION AND RECREATION 64 8.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Lampropeltis Getula (SERPENTES: COLUBRIDAE)
    ECOLOGY, CONSERVATION, AND MORPHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF THE KINGSNAKE, Lampropeltis getula (SERPENTES: COLUBRIDAE) By KENNETH L. KRYSKO A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2001 Copyright 2001 by Kenneth L. Krysko ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to express my greatest appreciation to my parents, Barbara and Len Krysko, for surviving all of my errors as a child, as well as the recent ones. If it were not for them and their outlook on wildlife and the environment I would not have developed such a passion for all biology-related fields. The research conducted as part of my Master of Science in Biology program at Florida International University, Miami, FL (1995), laid the groundwork for parts of this dissertation. It was in Miami that I was first exposed to all of the political and environmental problems in our state, including the many factors that have disrupted the Everglades ecosystem. I wish to thank my committee members at FIU: George H. Dalrymple (chair), Maureen Donnelly, Scott Quackenbush, Kelsey Downum, and Martin Tracey for their guidance and support. I truly thank my PhD committee members at the University of Florida: F. Wayne King (chair), D. Bruce Means, Walter S. Judd, L. Richard Franz, Brian W. Bowen, Raymond R. Carthy, and Joseph C. Shaefer. They have provided me with many different views on school, research and life. I am especially grateful to F. Wayne King, Kent Vliet, and Jon Reiskind for providing me with research and teaching assistantships throughout my graduate studies.
    [Show full text]