DOCSLIB.ORG

Buffalo Bayou Park Master Plan [Update] Shepherd to Sabine January 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Buffalo Bayou Park Master Plan [Update] Shepherd to Sabine January 2012 Buffalo Bayou Park master plan [update] Shepherd to Sabine January 2012 contents 1 SUMMARY 7 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 31 MASTER PLAN 47 THE PROJECT 107 PROTECTING THE INVESTMENT The Buffalo Bayou Partnership (BBP) wishes to thank: Catalyst Funder Environmental Advisory Committee Kinder Foundation Diana Foss, texas parks & wildlife department Jaime Gonzalez, katy prairie conservancy 2010 & 2011 Master Plan Funders T.J. Marks, houston parks & recreation department The Wortham Foundation Evelyn Merz, sierra club Board of Directors Buffalo Bayou Partnership Harris County Flood Control District (HCFCD) Mickey Merritt, texas forest service The Carruth Foundation Woody Woodrow, u.s. fish & wildlife service Central Houston Civic Improvement, Inc. Sami Ahmad Harry Lamberton Chair Houston Architecture Foundation Consultants Chuck Carlberg 2010 Ed Allday C.C. Lee, AIA, LEED AP Lionstone Group SWA Group master plan Bob Phillips 2011 Carol Ballard Martha K. Long Houston Arts Alliance Aviles Engineering Corporation geotechnical BPA/Eric Ruckstuhl riparian plants Vice Chair Jack Blanton, Jr. Susan McEldoon Judy and Scott Nyquist Joe Blanton native plants Judy Nyquist 2010 Carol Butler Roxann Neumann The Powell Foundation Infill Planning Design & Development lighting George W. (Trey) Strake 2010 Christina Cabral Adrian Patterson Sonny Flores 2011 Steering Committee Stephen Korns lighting concept Mark Cover Daron Peschel Sis Johnson 2011 Nancy G. Kinder, chair Moore Archeological Consultants archeology Collin J. Cox Sarah Powell Brady Carruth, buffalo bayou partnership PageSoutherlandPage Architects Treasurer Janelle Daniel Mohammad Ashraf Ramji Gary Dudley, kinder foundation RDP Engineers, Inc. structural engineering Bob Phillips 2010 Kathy Flanagan-Payton Edna Ramos Andy Icken and Joe Turner, city of houston Sami Ahmad 2011 AECOM—HCFCD preliminary engineering Sonny Flores Shannon B. Sasser, AIA Mike Talbott, harris county flood control district & site survey Secretary Lisa Foronda Dorothee Sauter CORE Design Studio graphic design Lorie Westrick, AIA 2010 Debby Francis Chad Shaw BBP Contracts Committee Guy Hagstette, AIA project management Leslye Lucas Weaver 2011 Mark Cover, chair John G. Garza Jeff Taylor Sami Ahmad photography Steven J. Gibson William J. Taylor, III Mike Garver Jim Olive, Photolive, Inc. cover, pgs. 2, 70 bottom left Daniel M. Gilbane Dancie Perugini Ware Jerry Higdon G. Lyon Photography, Inc., pg. 24 Van Stephens pg. 70 top left Gerald D. (Jerry) Higdon Leslye Lucas Weaver 2011 Shannon Sasser Jim Caldwell pg. 70 right middle Sis Johnson Margaret Wolfe Jeff Taylor summary 1 1 summary Buffalo Bayou from downtown to Shepherd Drive is Houston’s Group, this more detailed project-based Master Plan seeks to Iconic Landscape. The result of a century-old civic vision to enhance the green space, improve recreational amenities, restore 1.1 develop a greenbelt extending from downtown west to a regional the bayou channel, and improve access to nearby neighborhoods park, now known as Memorial Park, this green space is one of and the city at large, transforming the area into Buffalo Bayou Park, Houston’s triumphs of civic will and planning implemented over a the centerpiece and focal point for Houston’s growing network of period of decades in the early 20th century. While the view from linear parks along the region’s bayous. The Master Plan builds upon Memorial Drive and Allen Parkway still offers green vistas and completed and current projects: dramatic contrasts with the downtown skyline, the green space • HCFCD’s Pilot Project west of downtown, which has tested itself is suffering from years of under-funded maintenance and the channel restoration concepts and public support for this work, absence of a master plan to guide improvements, both of which are completed in late 2010. preventing this unique natural asset from fulfilling its potential as • The Rosemont Bridge (east of Studemont) and connector trails one of this country’s great urban parks. by the City’s Memorial Heights Tax Increment Reinvestment With significant philanthropic support led by the Kinder Foundation, Zone #5 (TIRZ #5) and completed in early 2011. the Buffalo Bayou Partnership (BBP) embarked on a privately-funded • Spanish artist Jaume Plensa’s Tolerance at the Rosemont master plan for the area in partnership with the City of Houston Bridge’s south approach by Houston Arts Alliance and (City) and the Harris County Flood Control District (HCFCD) in 2010 completed in early 2011. that was updated in late 2011. As the owner of the land, the City will oversee this redevelopment process and the park’s ongoing • Reconstruction of the Sandy Reed Memorial Trail by the City operations, which includes a commitment to fund maintenance and and TxDOT, which began in late 2011. operations upon completion of construction. More than 50 years Based on this Master Plan and strong support from Houston’s after its last investment in this area, HCFCD was invited to conduct citizens and philanthropic community, the City, BBP and HCFCD preliminary and final engineering studies of the bayou channel to are moving forward on final design and engineering of the Project, determine how the channel might be restored and maintained in which is described in Chapter 4. Channel restoration work and an environmentally sensitive manner while also improving its storm improvements to the green space are scheduled to begin in mid-2012. water storage and conveyance capacity. Based on the plan presented This schedule should allow for a seamless transition from TxDOT’s in this report, the Kinder Foundation is prepared to increase its hike and bike trail construction project into overall green space funding to $30,000,000, and BBP is raising up to $20,000,000 more improvements overseen by the City, BBP and HCFCD. If approvals in private funds so the ambitious improvements described in this and permits are obtained in a timely manner, construction should Master Plan can be implemented in an era of limited government be complete by mid-2015. Chapter 4 also describes the Approved resources. BBP also will maintain and operate the park until 2041 and Master Plan that governs the Project and any future improvements possibly until 2096. to Buffalo Bayou Park. Based on BBP’s visionary master plan for Buffalo Bayou from Shepherd Drive ten miles east to the Turning Basin released in 2002, Buffalo Bayou and Beyond produced by the Thompson Design 3 Memorial Heights St. Thomas Meadow Cemetery Overlook Jackson Hill High Bridge Live Oak Seating Circle Greentree Natural Area ProjectProject SiteSite PlanPlan Overlook STUDEMONT STREET JACKSON HILL STREET HILL JACKSON SHEPHERD DRIVE SHEPHERD MEMORIAL DRIVE ALLEN PARKWAY ROCHOW STREET WAUGH DRIVE MONTROSE BOULEVARD Shepherd Gateways Tirrell Meadow Tirrell Cascade Information/Kayak Lost Lake Bat Colony Viewing Area Wortham Fountain Dog Park Rental/Picnics Plaza Memorial Viaduct Police Memorial Sabine Information/Bicycle Artwork Footbridge Tapley Tributary Maintenance Yard Springs The Water Works Rentals SAWYER STREET STUDEMONT STREET SABINE STREET SABINE MEMORIAL DRIVE ALLEN PARKWAY STANFORD STREET TAFT STREET TAFT GILLETTE STREET MONTROSE BOULEVARD Stanford Lower Taft Footpath Cottonwood Bowl Skyline Event Allen Playground & Crosby Overlook Meadow Overlook Meadow Parkway Picnic Pavilion Promenade 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Buffalo Bayou Community Plan Lit Tle Cyp Res S 1960 Upper Cypress Creek G a Watershed Rn E
    S p ri ng C re ek k Sp e ring re C C re 2920 e w k Will o 99 Buffalo Bayou Community Plan Lit tle Cyp res s 1960 Upper Cypress Creek G a Watershed rn e r Land protection, restoration, s shallow storage B Cypres ayo s C u ree k Greens Bayou Addicks Watershed G Retention, r e e creekside storage n s Addicks ReservoirWhite Oak Ba B Excavate y a o Ha y l o u ls B 75,000 acre feet ayo u C u a r p 99 e B n e t a e r r C Tunnel interceptors H s r u e B e to help reduce flooding 40-Foot n k t along Bualo Bayou in a g y Flood Tunnel 10,000 cfs B o a u y o u B u Barker Reservoir u o al y Excavate o B a 86,000 acre feet FLOOD PROTECTION PLAN COSTS ou Brays Bay Construct additional storage in the Cypress u Stream yo a 45 Reservoir boundary S B ¨¦§ Creek over�low/upper Addicks watershed $ 0.20 B i ms County Line Restore/offset Addicks storage capacity* $ 0.60 B ¤£90A Restore/offset Barker storage capacity* $ 0.90 B FEMA Flood Type )"288 Construct Buffalo Bayou Bypass Tunnel** $ 4.20 B * Provide storage to offset previously available volume Total Cost $ 6.00 B Floodway )"35 Mitigate/restore wetlands $ 0.10 B 100-year Floodplain ** on private property. Lower �lowline of reservoirs so that excavated areas drain by gravity to �lood tunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo and Whiteoak Bayou Tmdl
    Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Pathogens in Buffalo Bayou and Whiteoak Bayou Contract No. 582-6-70860 Work Order No. 582-6-70860-21 TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR BUFFALO AND WHITEOAK BAYOU TMDL Prepared by University of Houston CDM Principal Investigator Hanadi Rifai Prepared for Total Maximum Daily Load Program Texas Commission on Environmental Quality P.O. Box 13087, MC - 150 Austin, Texas 78711-3087 TCEQ Contact: Ronald Stein TMDL Team (MC-203) P.O. Box 13087, MC - 203 Austin, Texas 78711-3087 [email protected] MAY 2008 Contract #- -582-6-70860/ Work Order # 582-6-70860-21 –Technical Support Document TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………..……………..….vi LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………………………..……… ... ….ix CHAPTER 1 : PROBLEM DEFINITION...................................................................................... 1 1.1 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION................................................................................. 1 1.2 ENDPOINT DESIGNATION.................................................................................... 5 1.3 CRITICAL CONDITION........................................................................................... 8 1.4 MARGIN OF SAFETY.............................................................................................. 8 CHAPTER 2 : SUMMARY OF EXISTING DATA...................................................................... 9 2.1 WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS...................................................................... 9 2.1.1 LAND USE........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries Flood Control Project Addicks & Barker Dams & Reservoirs 101 Past, Present & Future
    1 BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT ADDICKS & BARKER DAMS & RESERVOIRS 101 PAST, PRESENT & FUTURE “The views, opinions and findings contained in this report are those of the authors(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.” Location 2 Piney Point Gage Houston Average Annual Rainfall – 49.77 inches ADDICKS, BARKER AND BUFFALO BAYOU WATERSHEDS 3 Early Houston Floods 4 31 May-2 June 1929 and 7-10 December 1935 Buffalo Bayou & Tributaries 1940’s Original Plan 5 Ungated Conduits 6 at Addicks and Barker Dams Jan. 20, 1945 Houston 1950, 1992, 2016 7 GATING OF UNGATED CONDUITS 8 9 CHANGES AND THEIR IMPACTS Project Modifications • Deletion of South Canal = Results of Changes • Deletion of Cypress Creek Levee • Gating of the Structures • More Frequent Pools • Faster Rising Pools + Downstream Changes • Larger Pools • Increased Development • Decreased Releases • Longer Lasting Pools – + Upstream Changes • Increased Development • Increased Run-off • More Rapid Run-off Top Ten Pools – Addicks and Barker Reservoirs 10 ADDICKS DAM & RESERVOIR BARKER DAM & RESERVOIR SURFACE AREA CAPACITY IN % CAPACITY % CAPACITY OF SURFACE AREA CAPACITY IN % CAPACITY % CAPACITY OF DATE ELEV. (1) IN ACRES ACRE-FEET (2) MAX. POOL (3) GOL (4) DATE ELEV. (1) IN ACRES ACRE-FEET (2) MAX. POOL (3) GOL (4) 30 Aug '17 109.09 16,982 217,726 100.0+ 100.0 30 AUG '17 101.56 15,149 170,941 81.6 100.0 23 APR '16 102.65 12,834 123,067 61.1 96.5 25 APR '16
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Use Attainability Analysis of Buffalo/White Oak Bayou
    PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A RECREATIONAL USE ATTAINABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE BUFFALO BAYOU/WHITE OAK BAYOU STREAM SYSTEM IN HOUSTON, TEXAS BY Dr. Kirk Winemiller Dr. David Scott Dr. Scott Shafer John Baker Bibiana Correa Po-Hsin Lai TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS August 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements 5 Introduction 6 Historic Information 7 Description of the Study Area 13 Methods 14 Results 19 Summary 40 Recommendations 43 References 44 Appendix 1: On-Site Observations of Recreation Uses along Buffalo Bayou 46 Appendix 2: Environmental Assessment Methodology Definitions 53 2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Description of surveyed streams in Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Measurements were conducted during the summer of 2008. Stream type represents the dominant condition in the stream. Table 2. Stream Flow measurements in Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Measurements were conducted during the summer of 2008 on eleven cross sections. Table 3. Maximum depth and mean of physicochemical water characteristics of Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Values are presented from upstream to down stream and were calculated from measurements conducted during the summer of 2008, excluding obvious outliers. Abbreviations: VMD = Secchi disk was still visible at maximum depth. Table 4. Location, general surroundings, and point sources present at 85 sampled stations in the Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Table 5. Stream channel and corridor assessment per sampled station in the Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Table 6. Human activity registered in Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System during the summer of 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Harris County, Texas and Incorporated Areas VOLUME 1 of 12
    Harris County, Texas and Incorporated Areas VOLUME 1 of 12 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NO. COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NO. Baytown, City of 485456 Nassau Bay, City of 485491 Bellaire, City of 480289 Pasadena, City of 480307 Bunker Hill Village, City of 1 480290 Pearland, City of 480077 Deer Park, City of 480291 Piney Point Village, City of 480308 El Lago, City of 485466 Seabrook, City of 485507 Galena Park, City of 480293 Shoreacres, City of 485510 Hedwig Village, City of1 480294 South Houston, City of 480311 Hilshire Village, City of 480295 Southside Place, City of 480312 Houston, City of 480296 Spring Valley Village, City of 480313 Humble, City of 480297 Stafford, City of 480233 Hunter’s Creek Village, City of 480298 Taylor Lake Village, City of 485513 Jacinto City, City of 480299 Tomball, City of 480315 Jersey Village, City of 480300 Webster, City of 485516 La Porte, City of 485487 West University Place, City of 480318 Missouri City, City of 480304 Harris County Unincorporated Areas 480287 Morgans Point, City of 480305 1 No Special Flood Hazard Areas identified REVISED: November 15, 2019 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 48201CV001G NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Bayou East Master Plan Brings the Community’S Vision for Its Waterfront to Life
    Authentic Connected Inclusive Resilient A VISION FOR BUFFALO BAYOU EAST BUFFALO BAYOU PARTNERSHIP MICHAEL VAN VALKENBURGH ASSOCIATES Landscape Architecture HR&A ADVISORS Economic Development HUITT-ZOLLARS Engineering and Transportation LIMNOTECH Hydrology UTILE Urban Design and Architecture The Buffalo Bayou East Master Plan brings the community’s vision for its waterfront to life. Like other cities such as New York, Boston and St. Louis While most of Buffalo Bayou Partnership’s green space where Frederick Law Olmstead designed park systems, development has occurred west of Downtown, for more Houston hired Cambridge, Massachusetts landscape than a decade the organization has been acquiring architect Arthur Coleman Comey in 1912 to provide property and building a nascent trail system along the a plan that would guide the city’s growth. In his plan, waterway’s East Sector. The Buffalo Bayou East Master Houston: Tentative Plans for Its Development, Comey Plan brings the community’s vision for its waterfront asserted: “The backbone of a park system for Houston to life. Informed by significant outreach and engagement, will naturally be its creek valleys, which readily lend the plan envisions integrating new parks and trails, themselves to ‘parking’ … All the bayous should dynamic recreational and cultural destinations, and be ‘parked’ except where utilized for commerce.” connections to surrounding neighborhoods. Building upon Comey’s vision, Buffalo Bayou Partnership’s This plan is an important step forward for the future of (BBP) 2002 Buffalo Bayou and Beyond Master Plan Houston’s historic bayou—a project that will take decades and envisioned a network of green spaces along the Bayou require creative partnerships to unfold.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 107-337 107Th Congress an Act to Authorize the Secretary of the Interior to Study the Suitability and Feasibility Dec
    PUBLIC LAW 107-337—DEC. 16, 2002 116 STAT. 2883 Public Law 107-337 107th Congress An Act To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility Dec. 16, 2002 of establishing the Buffalo Bayou National Heritage Area in west Houston, Texas. [H.R. 1776] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Buffalo Bayou National SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. Heritage Area Study Act. This Act may be cited as the "Buffalo Bayou National Heritage Area Study Act". SEC. 2. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING BUFFALO BAYOU, TEXAS. (a) FINDINGS.—^The Congress finds the following: (1) The area beginning at Shepherd Drive in west Houston, Texas, and extending to the Turning Basin, commonly referred to as the "Buffalo Bayou", made a unique contribution to the cultural, political, and industrial development of the United States. (2) The Buffalo Bayou is distinctive as the first spine of modern industrial development in Texas and one of the first ailong the Gulf of Mexico coast. (3) The Buffalo Bayou played a significant role in the struggle for Texas independence. (4) The Buffalo Bayou developed a prosperous and produc­ tive shipping industry that survives today. (5) The Buffalo Bayou led in the development of Texas' petrochemical industry that made Houston the center of the early oil boom in America. (6) The Buffalo Bayou developed a sophisticated shipping system, leading to the formation of the modem day Houston Ship Channel. (7) The Buffalo Bayou developed a significant industrial base, and served as the focal point for the new city of Houston.
    [Show full text]
  • How's the Water?
    This story was made with Esri's Story Map Cascade. Read it on the web at http://arcg.is/1OKTKW. How’s the Water? 2018 Houston-Galveston Area Council Basin Highlights Report Watershed Characterizations for the Houston Ship Channel/Buffalo Bayou Tidal, Chocolate Bayou Tidal, and Chocolate Bayou Above Tidal Clean water is essential. Just as clean water is essential for life itself, it is also essential for the quality of our lives. Water is all around us. It flows through rural areas, our neighborhoods, and our cities. These waterways come in all shapes and sizes, from small drainage ditches and meandering creeks to seemingly lazy bayous and major rivers. All of them connect to one of the most productive estuaries in the nation, Galveston Bay, and ultimately the Gulf of Mexico. We walk and picnic near them, splash, swim, fish, and sail on them. Keeping them clean must be a priority for all of us. These waters help fuel a strong economy, bringing in billions of dollars a year and providing tens of thousands of jobs in commercial and recreational fishing and tourism. The 2018 Basin Highlights Report provides an overview of water quality and data trends in the Houston- Galveston region’s surface waters. Houston Ship Channel This report characterizes the Houston Ship Channel/Buffalo Bayou Tidal (Segment 1007), Chocolate Bayou Tidal (Segment 1107), and Chocolate Bayou Above Tidal (Segment 1108) watersheds to identify • Specific water quality issues and trends. • Sources of point and nonpoint pollution. • Current strategies and plans to reduce pollution within these watersheds. • Current and potential stakeholders working within these watersheds Since 1991, the Texas Clean Rivers Program (link: https://www.tceq.texas.gov/waterquality/clean-rivers) (CRP) has provided a framework for addressing water quality issues through an all-inclusive watershed approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects on Water Quality Due to Flood-Water Detention by Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Houston, Texas
    EFFECTS ON WATER QUALITY DUE TO FLOOD-WATER DETENTION BY BARKER AND ADDICKS RESERVOIRS, HOUSTON, TEXAS By Fred Liscum, R. L. Goss, and E. M. Paul U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 86-4356 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Austin, Texas 1987 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch 649 Federal Building U.S. Geological Survey 300 E. Eighth Street Box 25425, Federal Center Austin, TX 78701 Denver, CO 80225 II CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 3 Description of study area 3 Purpose and scope 5 Study approach 5 Data collection 5 Data analysis 8 Description of water quality 16 Field measurements, biochemical oxygen demand, and bacteria 21 Physical and aesthetic properties 25 Major inorganic constituents and related properties 27 Nutrients and total organic carbon 30 Trace el ements 32 Pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls 33 Effects on water quality due to flood-water detention 36 Variation of discharge-weighted average values for selected hydro!ogic events 37 Summary of events 37 Event of May 1-22, 1981 40 Barker Reservoir system 40 Addicks Reservoi r system 41 Summary 41 Statistical analysis of discharge-weighted average values 41 Variation of means, max i mums, and mini mums for selected constituents and properties 45 Summary and conclusions 51 References cited 57 Appendix A - Field measurements, biochemical oxygen demand, and bacteria 58 Appendix B - Physical and aesthetic properties 67 Appendix C - Major inorganic constituents and related properties 72 Appendix D - Nutrients and total organic carbon 82 Appendix E - Trace elements 88 Appendix F - Pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls 89 III ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Bayou Park Vegetation Plan
    BUFFALO BAYOU PARK VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared for: Texas Forest Service 301 Tarrow, Suite 364 College Station, TX 77840-7896 TABLE OF CONTENTS BUFFALO BAYOU PARK VEGETATION MANAGEMEN PLAN 1. Overview 1.1 Buffalo Bayou Park Site Plan 1 1.2 Plan Summary 2 1.3 How to Use This Plan 3 2. Goals and Objectives 2.1 Overall Goals of the West Sector 4 2.2 Urban Forestry Goals 4 2.3 Buffalo Bayou Park Vegetation Management Plan Goals and Objectives 4 3. Context of Plan 3.1 West Sector History 6 3.2 Previous Plans and Policies 7 4. Assessment of Existing Resources 4.1 Geology 8 4.2 Soils 8 4.3 Slope Stability and Erosion 8 4.4 Flooding 8 4.5 Line-Intercept Transect Vegetation Analysis 8 4.6 Vegetation Inventory Analysis 8 4.7 Vegetative Zones 9 5. Significant Management Zones 5.1 Riparian Management Zone 15 5.2 Tributary Management Zone 19 5.3 Forest Management Zone 23 5.4 Wildflower Management Zone 27 5.5 Prairie Management Zone 31 5.6 Wetland Management Zone 36 6. Maintenance Procedures 6.1 Current Management Practices in Buffalo Bayou Park 40 6.2 Tree Maintenance Guidelines (USDA Urban Forestry Manual, Summary) 40 6.3 Non-herbicide Invasive Species Control 44 6.4 Herbicide Invasive Species Control (USDA SRS-62, Summary) 45 7. Streambank Stabilization Demonstration Project 7.1 Project Objectives 50 7.2 Streambank Erosion 50 7.3 Types of Streambank Stabilization 50 7.4 Soil Bioengineering 51 7.5 Streambank Stabilization Demonstration Project 51 APPENDIX I Line-Intercept Transect Sample Locations APPENDIX II Invasive and Non-native Plant
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Bayou Tidal Segment: 1013 San Jacinto River Basin
    2002 Texas Water Quality Inventory Page : 1 (based on data from 03/01/1996 to 02/28/2001) Buffalo Bayou Tidal Segment: 1013 San Jacinto River Basin Basin number: 10 Basin group: C Water body description: From a point 100 meters (110 yards) upstream of US 59 in Harris County to a point 400 meters (440 yards) upstream of Shepard Drive in Harris County Water body classification: Classified Water body type: Tidal Stream Water body length / area: 4 Miles Water body uses: Aquatic Life Use, Contact Recreation Use, General Use, Fish Consumption Use Standards Not Met in 2002 Assessment Area Use Support Status Parameter Category Entire segment Contact Recreation Use Not Supporting bacteria 5a Standards Not Met and Concerns in Previous Years Support Status Assessment Area Use or Concern Parameter Category Entire segment Aquatic Life Use Not Supporting copper (chronic) in water 5c Additional Information: The fish consumption and general uses are fully supported. This segment was identified on the 2000 303(d) List as not supporting the aquatic life use due to copper in water. Because there were insufficient data available in 2002 to evaluate changes in water quality, this segment will be identified asnot meeting the standard for copper in water until sufficient data are available to demonstrate use support. 2002 Concerns: Assessment Area Use or Concern Concern Status Description of Concern Entire segment Nutrient Enrichment Concern Concern nitrate+nitrite nitrogen Entire segment Nutrient Enrichment Concern Concern orthophosphorus Entire segment Nutrient Enrichment Concern Concern total phosphorus Monitoring sites used: Assessment Area Station ID Station Description Entire segment 11345 BUFFALO BAYOU TIDAL AT MCKEE ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Tech Report of AMERICA’S FOURTH LARGEST CITY
    CHARTING THE INNOVATION LANDSCAPE The Houston Tech REport OF AMERICA’S FOURTH LARGEST CITY. HOUSTON: A CITY OF INNOVATION The nation’s fourth largest city is one of the youngest, fastest Houston’s economy, the region has become a thriving hub of ACCELERATING CHANGE growing, and most diverse populations anywhere in the world. digital technology talent and companies thanks to our access This global diversity creates a genuine cultural identity and way to customers and expertise. Long known and admired as the energy capital of the world and and the Mayor’s Task Force on Innovation, HX is a non-profit of life that is uniquely Houston and world class. the most diverse city in the United States, with a broad STEM- organization created to accelerate the growth of Houston’s innovation A strong educational system with nationally ranked trained workforce and a robust corporate presence, Houston’s tech ecosystem. While our shared roots are proudly planted in Texas, Houston’s universities, graduate schools, and community colleges innovation potential lagged— until recently. reach and influence is truly global. Not only because of the produces a large supply of young talent. Our exceptional Over the past four years, HX has helped unlock the collaborative substantial foreign investment in our region or the logistics quality of life offers the cultural, recreational and entertainment Four years ago, recognizing the opportunity to capitalize on its potential of founders and investors in the startup scene, local capabilities that provide unparalleled access to foreign markets, amenities of a modern, cosmopolitan city, but at a cost of living cultural and economic strengths, and the need to develop its startup government, academic institutions, and the corporate sector to but also the groundbreaking innovation that is helping solve the well below the national average.
    [Show full text]