DOCSLIB.ORG

Lithuania for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lithuania for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital CONVENTION BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA AND THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME AND ON CAPITAL The Republic of Estonia and the Republic of Lithuania, wishing to conclude a Convention for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and on capital, have agreed as follows: Article 1. Persons Covered This Convention shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the Contracting States. Article 2. Taxes Covered 1. This Convention shall apply to taxes on income and on capital imposed on behalf of a Contracting State or of its local authorities, irrespective of the manner in which they are levied. 2. There shall be regarded as taxes on income and on capital all taxes imposed on total income, on total capital, or on elements of income or of capital, including taxes on gains from the alienation of movable or immovable property, as well as taxes on capital appreciation. 3. The existing taxes to which the Convention shall apply are, in particular: a) in Estonia: income tax (tulumaks); (hereinafter referred to as “Estonian tax”); b) in Lithuania: (i) the tax on profits (pelno mokestis); (ii) the tax on income of natural persons (pajamu, mokestis); (iii) the immovable property tax (nekilnojamojo turto mokestis); (hereinafter referred to as “Lithuanian tax”). 4. The Convention shall apply also to any identical or substantially similar taxes which are imposed after the date of signature of the Convention in addition to, or in place of, the existing taxes. The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall notify each other of any significant changes which have been made in their respective taxation laws. Article 3. General Definitions 1. For the purposes of this Convention, unless the context otherwise requires: a) the term “Estonia” means the Republic of Estonia and, when used in the geographic sense, means the territory of Estonia and any other area adjacent to the territorial waters of Estonia within which, under the laws of Estonia and in accordance with international law, the rights of Estonia may be exercised with respect to the sea bed and its sub-soil and their natural resources; b) the term “Lithuania” means the Republic of Lithuania and, when used in the geographic sense, means the territory of the Republic of Lithuania and any other area adjacent to the territorial waters of the Republic of Lithuania within which, under the laws of the Republic of Lithuania and in accordance with international law, the rights of Lithuania may be exercised with respect to the sea bed and its sub-soil and their natural resources; c) the term “person” includes an individual, a company and any other body of persons; d) the term “company” means any body corporate or any entity which is treated as a body corporate for tax purposes; e) the terms “enterprise of a Contracting State” and “enterprise of the other Contracting State” mean respectively an enterprise carried on by a resident of a Contracting State and an enterprise carried on by a resident of the other Contracting State; f) the term “national” means: (i) any individual possessing the nationality of a Contracting State; (ii) any legal person, partnership or association deriving its status as such from the laws in force in a Contracting State; g) the term “international traffic” means any transport by a ship or aircraft operated by an enterprise of a Contracting State, except when the ship or aircraft is operated solely between places in the other Contracting State; h) the term “competent authority” means: (i) in Estonia, the Minister of Finance and his authorised representative; (ii) in Lithuania, the Minister of Finance and his authorised representative. 2. As regards the application of the Convention by a Contracting State at any time by a Contracting State, any term not defined therein shall, unless the context otherwise requires, have the meaning that it has under the law of that State for the purposes of the taxes to which the Convention applies, any meaning under the applicable tax laws of that State prevailing over a meaning given to the term under other laws of that State. Article 4. Resident 1. For the purposes of this Convention, the term “resident of a Contracting State” means any person who, under the laws of that State, is liable to tax therein by reason of his domicile, residence, place of management, place of incorporation or any other criterion of a similar nature, and also includes that State and any local authority thereof. However, this term does not include any person who is liable to tax in that State in respect only of income from sources in that State or capital situated therein. 2. Where by reason of the provisions of paragraph 1 an individual is a resident of both Contracting States, then his status shall be determined as follows: a) he shall be deemed to be a resident only of the State in which he has a permanent home available to him; if he has a permanent home available to him in both States, he shall be deemed to be a resident only of the State with which his personal and economic relations are closer (centre of vital interests); b) if the State in which he has his centre of vital interests cannot be determined, or if he has not a permanent home available to him in either State, he shall be deemed to be a resident only of the State in which he has an habitual abode; c) if he has an habitual abode in both States or in neither of them, he shall be deemed to be a resident only of the State of which he is a national; d) if he is a national of both States or of neither of them, the competent authorities of the Contracting States shall settle the question by mutual agreement. 3. Where by reason of the provisions of paragraph 1 a person other than an individual is a resident of both Contracting States, the competent authorities of the Contracting States shall endeavour to settle the question by mutual agreement. In the absence of such agreement, for the purposes of the Convention, the person shall not be entitled to claim any benefits provided by this Convention. Article 5. Permanent Establishment 1. For the purposes of this Convention, the term “permanent establishment” means a fixed place of business through which the business of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on. 2. The term “permanent establishment” includes especially: a) a place of management; b) a branch; c) an office; d) a factory; e) a workshop, and f) a mine, an oil or gas well, a quarry or any other place of extraction of natural resources. 3. A building site, a construction, assembly or installation project or a supervisory activity connected therewith constitutes a permanent establishment only if such site, project or activity last for a period of more than six months. 4. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Article, the term “permanent establishment” shall be deemed not to include: a) the use of facilities solely for the purpose of storage, display or delivery of goods or merchandise belonging to the enterprise; b) the maintenance of a stock of goods or merchandise belonging to the enterprise solely for the purpose of storage, display or delivery; c) the maintenance of a stock of goods or merchandise belonging to the enterprise solely for the purpose of processing by another enterprise; d) the maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for the purpose of purchasing goods or merchandise or of collecting information, for the enterprise; e) the maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for the purpose of carrying on, for the enterprise, any other activity of a preparatory or auxiliary character; f) the maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for any combination of activities mentioned in sub-paragraphs a) to e), provided that the overall activity of the fixed place of business resulting from this combination is of a preparatory or auxiliary character. 5. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2, where a person – other than an agent of an independent status to whom paragraph 6 applies – is acting on behalf of an enterprise and has, and habitually exercises, in a Contracting State an authority to conclude contracts in the name of the enterprise, that enterprise shall be deemed to have a permanent establishment in that State in respect of any activities which that person undertakes for the enterprise, unless the activities of such person are limited to those mentioned in paragraph 4 which, if exercised through a fixed place of business, would not make this fixed place of business a permanent establishment under the provisions of that paragraph. 6. An enterprise shall not be deemed to have a permanent establishment in a Contracting State merely because it carries on business in that State through a broker, general commission agent or any other agent of an independent status, provided that such persons are acting in the ordinary course of their business. However, when the activities of such an agent are devoted wholly or almost wholly on behalf of that enterprise, he will not be considered an agent of an independent status within the meaning of that paragraph. 7. The fact that a company which is a resident of a Contracting State controls or is controlled by a company which is a resident of the other Contracting State, or which carries on business in that other State (whether through a permanent establishment or otherwise), shall not of itself constitute either company a permanent establishment of the other.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flash Reports on Labour Law January 2017 Summary and Country Reports
    Flash Report 01/2017 Flash Reports on Labour Law January 2017 Summary and country reports EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Unit B.2 – Working Conditions Flash Report 01/2017 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 ISBN ABC 12345678 DOI 987654321 © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Flash Report 01/2017 Country Labour Law Experts Austria Martin Risak Daniela Kroemer Belgium Wilfried Rauws Bulgaria Krassimira Sredkova Croatia Ivana Grgurev Cyprus Nicos Trimikliniotis Czech Republic Nataša Randlová Denmark Natalie Videbaek Munkholm Estonia Gaabriel Tavits Finland Matleena Engblom France Francis Kessler Germany Bernd Waas Greece Costas Papadimitriou Hungary Gyorgy Kiss Ireland Anthony Kerr Italy Edoardo Ales Latvia Kristine Dupate Lithuania Tomas Davulis Luxemburg Jean-Luc Putz Malta Lorna Mifsud Cachia Netherlands Barend Barentsen Poland Leszek Mitrus Portugal José João Abrantes Rita Canas da Silva Romania Raluca Dimitriu Slovakia Robert Schronk Slovenia Polonca Končar Spain Joaquín García-Murcia Iván Antonio Rodríguez Cardo Sweden Andreas Inghammar United Kingdom Catherine Barnard Iceland Inga Björg Hjaltadóttir Liechtenstein Wolfgang Portmann Norway Helga Aune Lill Egeland Flash Report 01/2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alevist Vallamajani from Borough to Community House
    Eesti Vabaõhumuuseumi Toimetised 2 Alevist vallamajani Artikleid maaehitistest ja -kultuurist From borough to community house Articles on rural architecture and culture Tallinn 2010 Raamatu väljaandmist on toetanud Eesti Kultuurkapital. Toimetanud/ Edited by: Heiki Pärdi, Elo Lutsepp, Maris Jõks Tõlge inglise keelde/ English translation: Tiina Mällo Kujundus ja makett/ Graphic design: Irina Tammis Trükitud/ Printed by: AS Aktaprint ISBN 978-9985-9819-3-1 ISSN-L 1736-8979 ISSN 1736-8979 Sisukord / Contents Eessõna 7 Foreword 9 Hanno Talving Hanno Talving Ülevaade Eesti vallamajadest 11 Survey of Estonian community houses 45 Heiki Pärdi Heiki Pärdi Maa ja linna vahepeal I 51 Between country and town I 80 Marju Kõivupuu Marju Kõivupuu Omad ja võõrad koduaias 83 Indigenous and alien in home garden 113 Elvi Nassar Elvi Nassar Setu küla kontrolljoone taga – Lõkova Lykova – Setu village behind the 115 control line 149 Elo Lutsepp Elo Lutsepp Asustuse kujunemine ja Evolution of settlement and persisting ehitustraditsioonide püsimine building traditions in Peipsiääre Peipsiääre vallas. Varnja küla 153 commune. Varnja village 179 Kadi Karine Kadi Karine Miljööväärtuslike Virumaa Milieu-valuable costal villages of rannakülade Eisma ja Andi väärtuste Virumaa – Eisma and Andi: definition määratlemine ja kaitse 183 of values and protection 194 Joosep Metslang Joosep Metslang Palkarhitektuuri taastamisest 2008. Methods for the preservation of log aasta uuringute põhjal 197 architecture based on the studies of 2008 222 7 Eessõna Eesti Vabaõhumuuseumi toimetiste teine köide sisaldab 2008. aasta teaduspäeva ettekannete põhjal kirjutatud üpris eriilmelisi kirjutisi. Omavahel ühendab neid ainult kaks põhiteemat: • maaehitised ja maakultuur. Hanno Talvingu artikkel annab rohkele arhiivimaterjalile ja välitööaine- sele toetuva esmase ülevaate meie valdade ja vallamajade kujunemisest alates 1860.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital
    CONVENTION BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA AND THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME AND ON CAPITAL The Government of the Republic of Estonia and the Government of the Kingdom of Norway, Desiring to conclude a Convention for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and on capital, Have agreed as follows: Article 1 PERSONAL SCOPE This Convention shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the Contracting States. Article 2 TAXES COVERED 1. The existing taxes to which the Convention shall apply are: a) In Estonia: (i) the personal income tax (üksikisiku tulumaks); (ii) the corporate income tax (ettevõtte tulumaks); (iii) the licence tax (tegevusloa maks); (hereinafter referred to as "Estonian tax"); b) In Norway: (i) the national tax on income (inntektsskatt til staten); (ii) the county municipal tax on income (inntektsskatt til fylkeskommunen); (iii)the municipal tax on income (inntektsskatt til kommunen); (iv) the national contributions to the Tax Equalisation Fund (fellesskatt til Skattefordelingsfondet); (v) the national tax on capital (formuesskatt til staten); (vi) the municipal tax on capital (formuesskatt til kommunen); (vii) the national tax relating to income and capital from the exploration for and the exploitation of submarine petroleum resources and activities and work relating thereto, including pipeline transport of petroleum produced (skatt til staten vedrørende inntekt og formue i forbindelse med undersøkelse etter og utnyttelse av undersjøiske petroleumsforekomster og dertil knyttet virksomhet og arbeid, herunder rørledningstransport av utvunnet petroleum); and (viii) the national dues on remuneration to non-resident artistes (avgift til staten av honorarer som tilfaller kunstnere bosatt i utlandet); (hereinafter referred to as "Norwegian tax").
    [Show full text]
  • Estonia in the Eurozone – a Strategic Success
    oswCommentary issue 53 | 20.06.2011 | Centre for eastern studies Estonia in the eurozone y – a strategic success ENTAR m Paweł Siarkiewicz Com es C The adoption of the euro in January 2011 topped off Estonia’s integration policy. In the opinion of Estonian politicians, this country has never been so secure and stable in its history. Tallinn sees the introduction of the tudies euro primarily in the political context as an entrenchment of the Estonian s presence in Europe. The process of establishing increasingly close rela- tions with Western European countries, which the country has consisten- astern tly implemented since it restored independence in 1991, has been aimed e at severing itself its Soviet past and at a gradual reduction of the gap existing between Estonia and the best-developed European economies. The Estonian government also prioritises the enhancement of co-operation as part of the EU and NATO as well as its principled fulfilment of the Centre for country’s undertakings. It sees these as important elements for building the country’s international prestige. y The meeting of the Maastricht criteria at the time of an economic slump ENTAR m and the adoption of the euro during the eurozone crisis proved the deter- mination and efficiency of the government in Tallinn. Its success has been Com based on strong support from the Estonian public for the pro-European es C (integrationist) policy of Estonia: according to public opinion polls, appro- ximately 80% of the country’s residents declare their satisfaction with EU membership, while support for the euro ranges between 50% and 60%.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Taxation Treaty Between Ireland and the Republic of Estonia
    Double Taxation Treaty between Ireland and Estonia Convention between the Government of Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Estonia for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital gains The Government of Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Estonia, desiring to conclude a Convention for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital gains, have agreed as follows: 1 Article 1 Personal Scope This Convention shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the Contracting States. 2 Article 2 Taxes Covered 1. This Convention shall apply to taxes on income and capital gains imposed on behalf of a Contracting State or of its local authorities, irrespective of the manner in which they are levied. 2. There shall be regarded as taxes on income and capital gains all taxes imposed on total income or on elements of income, including taxes on gains from the alienation of movable or immovable property. 3. The existing taxes to which this Convention shall apply are in particular: a. in the case of Ireland: i. the income tax; ii. the corporation tax; iii. the capital gains tax; (hereinafter referred to as "Irish tax"); b. in the case of Estonia: i. the income tax (tulumaks); ii. the local income tax (kohalik tulumaks); (hereinafter referred to as" Estonian tax"). 4. The Convention shall apply also to any identical or substantially similar taxes which are imposed after the date of signature of the Convention in addition to, or in place of, the existing taxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Way to Liberal Economic System
    Center for Social & Economic Research ESTONIAN WAY TO LIBERAL ECONOMIC SYSTEM Jarosław Bauc CASE, Center for Social & Economic Research Warsaw, Poland Warsaw, April 1995 Materials published in this series have a character of working papers which can be a subject of further publications in the future. The views and opinions expressed here reflect Authors' point of view and not necessary those of CASE . Paper was prepared for the project: "Economic Reforms in the former USSR" (Reformy gospodarcze na terenie dawnego ZSRR), financed by the Committee of Scientific Reasearch (Komitet Badań Naukowych). CASE Research Foundation, Warsaw 1995 ISBN 83-86296-34-8 Editor: CASE - Center for Social & Economic Research 00-585 Warszawa, Bagatela 14 tel/fax (48-2) 628 65 81; tel/fax (48-22) 29 43 83 Estonian Way to Liberal Economic System 1. Starting point of reform and general features of development Estonia 1 has adopted the one of the most radical programs of stabilization and transformation amongst not only the former Soviet Union countries but among previously centrally planned economies as well. The commodity and service markets were balanced mainly through the price liberalization and introduction of the internally convertible national currency. This was supplimented with the austerity in public consumption and surpluss in the state budget. The changes were also associated with a radical shift in the foreign trade rearientation. The economy that previously was oriented to almost costless recources from the former Soviet Union and work mostly for the Soviet "markets" seems to be very well adjusted to western markets and broad participation in the world economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile Estonia 2020
    Estonia Country Profile EU Tax Centre June 2020 Key tax factors for efficient cross-border business and investment involving Estonia EU Member Yes. State Double Tax With the following countries, territories and jurisdictions: Treaties Albania France Kyrgyzstan Slovakia Armenia Georgia Latvia Slovenia Austria Germany Lithuania Spain Azerbaijan Greece Luxembourg Sweden Bahrain Hong Kong SAR Malta Switzerland Belarus Hungary Mexico Thailand Belgium Iceland Moldova Turkey Bulgaria India Netherlands Turkmenistan Canada Ireland North Macedonia UAE China Isle of Man Norway UK Croatia Israel Poland Ukraine Czech Rep. Italy Portugal US Cyprus Japan Romania Uzbekistan Denmark Jersey Serbia Vietnam Finland Kazakhstan Singapore Rep. of Korea Most important Public limited company (aktsiaselts, AS), forms of doing Private limited company (osaühing, OÜ). business Legal entity Minimum share capital of a public limited liability company is EUR 25,000, capital Minimum share capital of a private limited liability company is EUR 2,500. requirements Residence and A legal person is a resident if it is established pursuant to Estonian law. tax system Resident companies are taxed on their worldwide income when distributed © 2020 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated. 1 (not taxable as long as it is retained in the company), and non-resident companies are taxed on Estonian source business income when distributed. Compliance Taxable amount must be reported monthly whenever profits are distributed or requirements for payments treated as profit distribution/taxable expenses are made. Form TSD CIT purposes (a combined tax return for CIT and payroll taxes) with Annexes and Form INF1 should be filed by the 10th day of the month following the payment.
    [Show full text]
  • Miracle of Estonia: Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness Policy in Estonia
    FORUM ON “AFTER FIFTEEN YEARS OF MARKET REFORMS IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES: NEW CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES FOR THE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR” Trade, Industry and Enterprise Development Week UNECE 24-25 May MIRACLE OF ESTONIA: ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND COMPETITIVENESS POLICY IN ESTONIA by Mrs. Signe Ratso Deputy Secretary General of EU and International Co-operation Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications of the Republic of Estonia [email protected] UNECE Palais des Nations, Geneva 2005 STARTING POSITION - WILLINGNESS FOR REFORMS BUT NO CONCRETE EXPERIENCES! Over ten years Estonia has experienced great changes in its economy and society. As Estonia was part of the Soviet Union, the economic activity was dictated by the needs of centrally planned system and Estonia was almost cut off from the Western European countries. Regaining the independence put Estonia to completely different situation – metaphorically, Estonia had to start from zero. Weak starting position: • State owned companies • Guaranteed product-markets • Fixed prices • Deficit in goods and services • No open economy, no real value for money • No real financial intermediation • Guaranteed jobs, no motivation. The overall goal of economic policy was exactly the same as in many other countries – to achieve sustainable, socially and regionally balanced economic growth. It has been characteristic of Estonian economic reform that no branch of economy has been preferred, practically the only determining factor in the restructuring has been the ability of an enterprise to adapt itself to economic conditions, especially its ability to orientate itself to the Western market. Estonia chose very liberal form of market economy and set up simple and clear rules for that.There exist two types of economist, where ones prefer quick reforms, who support shock therapy approach and the others step-by step approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of 2007 Cyber Attacks Against Estonia: Information Warfare
    Analysis of the 2007 Cyber Attacks Against Estonia from the Information Warfare Perspective Rain Ottis Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence, Tallinn, Estonia [email protected] Abstract: Following the relocation of a Soviet-era statue in Tallinn in April of 2007, Estonia fell under a politically motivated cyber attack campaign lasting twenty-two days. Perhaps the best known attacks were distributed denial of service attacks, resulting in temporary degradation or loss of service on many commercial and government servers. While most of the attacks targeted non-critical services like public websites and e-mail, others concentrated on more vital targets, such as online banking and DNS. At the time of this writing – more than six months after the cyber attacks – no organization or group has claimed responsibility for the cyber attacks, although some individuals have been linked with carrying them out. This paper will argue that the key to understanding the cyber attacks that took place against Estonia in 2007 lies with the analysis of an abundance of circumstantial evidence that ran parallel to the cyber attacks. These consisted of political, economic and information attacks on Estonia, as well as isolated cases of physical violence. Clear political signatures were even detected in the malicious network traffic. All told, it is clear that the cyber attacks were linked with the overall political conflict between Estonia and Russia. While some analysts have considered last year’s events in Estonia an international, grass roots, display of public opinion, there are some direct and many indirect indications of state support behind what can be best described as an information operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Albania Andorra Austria Belgium Cyprus Denmark Estonia Finland
    Unaccompanied minors receive Greek language classes at a reception centre. Albania Andorra Austria Belgium Cyprus Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Holy See Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Monaco Netherlands Norway Portugal San Marino Spain Working environment Sweden This subregion is critically important to the international protection regime. According to provisional figures, nine out of Switzerland ten asylum applications in Europe were lodged in countries of this subregion in the first half of 2010. In the same period, more United Kingdom of Great Britain and than 90 per cent of decisions in Europe to grant refugee status have been taken here, and the subregion is host to nearly all Northern Ireland refugees accepted for resettlement in Europe. 290 UNHCR Global Appeal 2011 Update UNHCR/J. BJÖRGVINSSON UNHCR Global Appeal 2011 Update 291 The countries in this subregion face diverse but often The number of asylum-seekers arriving by sea in Southern interrelated challenges. Twenty of them are EU Member States Europe has fallen sharply. Cooperation between European States and therefore actively engaged in the efforts of the European and third countries to prevent irregular arrivals, including Union (EU) to build a Common European Asylum System. through interception at sea, appears to have led to this decline. Some are located at the EU’s external borders, others are not. All This continues to generate concerns over access to territory and face the challenge of protecting refugees within complex mixed asylum procedures for those seeking protection. migratory flows. In view of the wide disparities in the numbers of asylum Furthermore, the subregion includes 15 of UNHCR’s top 20 applications received in different States, the implementation of donor countries, accounts for more than 40 per cent of the Dublin II Regulation, which identifies the State private-sector contributions to UNHCR, and has an active civil responsible for examining an asylum application, has society and influential media.
    [Show full text]
  • Flash Reports on Labour Law November 2019 Summary and Country Reports
    Flash Reports on Labour Law November 2019 Summary and country reports Written by The European Centre of Expertise (ECE), based on reports submitted by the Network of Labour Law Experts November 2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Unit B.2 – Working Conditions Contact: Marie LAGUARRIGUE E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels Flash Report 11/2019 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the author(s). The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the position or opinion of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person/organisation acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of any information contained in this publication. This publication has received financial support from the European Union Programme for Employment and Social Innovation "EaSI" (2014-2020). For further information please consult: http://ec.europa.eu/social/easi. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 ISBN ABC 12345678 DOI 987654321 © European Union, 2019 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • PISA 2009 – Lessons for Estonia
    PISA 2009 – Lessons for Estonia Maie Kitsing Tartu 2011 PISA 2009 – Lessons for Estonia Ministry of Education and Research Munga 18, Tartu 50088 ESTONIA Tel: +372 735 0120 Fax: +372 735 0250 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.hm.ee © Ministry of Education and Research, External Evaluation department, 2011 Published by: Ministry of Education and Research, External Evaluation Department Author: Maie Kitsing Design: Taavi Suisalu Translation: Gunda Tire ISBN 978-9985-72-199-5 Sisukord Sisukord 3 Introduction 5 I. Overview of PISA 7 II. PISA 2009 results 9 III. PISA – chance to learn from other countries 18 IV. Policy and teacher training implications 20 V. Main lessons for Estonia from PISA 2009 24 References 27 Appendix 1. Policy implications from PISA results 28 Appendix 2. Description of a great education system and Estonian examples 29 Appendix 3. Description of a good education system and Estonian examples 30 Introduction Jaak Aaviksoo, Minister of Education and Research Once again we have a detailed overview about the knowledge and skills of Estonian students at the end of comprehensive education. It is a great pleasure to recognize that internationally Estonian students excel in their performance in reading literacy as well as in science and mathe- matics. In reading literacy Estonia ranks fifth in Europe, tenth among the OECD countries and thirteenth in the world. Although the survey results indicate good stu- dent performance, we also learn about the bott- lenecks of the Estonian education system. It is essential to notice those as students finishing the compre- hensive school should have a solid foundation on which to build their future- make reasonable choices, participate in lifelong learning and contribute to the development of the state and society.
    [Show full text]