Arrival in the Virginia Colony
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Somerset Parish Registers. Marriages. IX
S o m e rse t a ri s h e i s t R g e rs . "m a rria ges. ED ITED BY W . PH LL MOR E . I I M A. P W , . , A ND E M E . TC H . W . SEAGER, . , , O R mell Tamni n um o . f , I X VOL. I oubou SS U ED TO THE S U BS CR I BER S BY PHILLIMOR E Co . I , 1 HAN CER Y LANE . 24, C 1 907 . R P E F A C E . This ninth volume of Somerset Marriage Registers in clude s the first portion of the Registers of the important ’ parish of St . Mary s , Taunton , but the number of Marriages recorded in it are so numerous that it has been found t requisite to divide it into two por ions. The remaining l l X portion will fo low immediately in Vo ume . c For its trans ription , Mr . Seager has been responsible . c c s of As before, ontra tion have been made use = = f he r sh o f. w o . o t w idow e r or wid w . p pa i = = f in he o nt o . o m n o . t u s . s inste r s n e c c p , i gl w a , y = f. n f dio c . in the o ce se o or so o . di ' = Z = r e n e . o r e a n . z m r ia e . b b a che l or s n m c. -
Final Copy 2019 01 23 Wilkin
This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Wilkins, Vernon Title: A Field the Lord hath Blessed the Person, Works, Life and Polemical Ecclesiology of Richard Field, DD, 15611616 General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. “A Field the Lord hath Blessed” The Person, Works, Life and Polemical Ecclesiology of -
Parish Ers. Tdarriag Es
P i h r a r s e s . flDarria e s . t g GENER A L ED ITOR TH M . O S . BLA F . GG . S A , . K ] ; ' ' V X éL. V: ED ITED BY 5 . AN DREWS, Ion b on : [93 0 05 to r m : S U BSCRIBER S B l Lx mon E Cc . LTD . n p . , 1 2 H ANC ERY LA NE 4, C . 1 91 3. P R E F A C E . TH E present is a continuation of the tenth volume of the V ~ 1 0 ol. X u H am pshire Series . , iss ed in 9 7 , contai ned the f a M arriages of the im portant parish o St . Thomas Becket , XV 1 6 1 00 . Portsmouth , from 53 to 7 inclusive This , Vol , 1 0 1 1 continues them from 7 to 7 7 5. At least another volume will be required to bring these Marriages down to the year 1 8 i o . 37 , when C vil Registrati n began O f o 1 0 1 to 1 8 the abstracts here given , th se from 7 7 5 who we . re made by M r A T . Everitt and M iss G Barell , did of the former volume . The proofs these have been checked with the origi nal Registers and the abstracts conti nued to 1 7 7 5 by M r . S. Andrews . of The whole are printed by permission the Vicar, the i M dlcot . e t Rev. R S 1 37 9] It should be remem bered that previ ous to 1 7 52 the year on 2 th of of was calculated as beginning the s March, instead w t of u s o on the Jan ary, th at a marriage taki ng place say z oth 1 2 on 1 2 6 o February 7 5, would be that date in 7 , acc rding to our reckoning ;but as the civil and ecclesiastical year were z oth . -
Wiltshire Parish Registers : Marriages
Gc M, L 942.31019 Aalp V.6 l'^79270 •^•^ GENEALOGY COLLECTION "•^ ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00727 9315 / iy''-^-^^^ i-^^~^4iA iUjL^/.,!^^/o^^ 5^ '->^' \Si, J^U .44?^^/^,< WILTSHIRE ^7,.t- PARISH REGlStER^: phillimore's parish register series. VOL. CV. (wilts., vol. VI.) One hundred and fifty printed. : Wiltshire Parish Registers Edited by W. P. W. PHILLIMORE, M.A., B.C.L., AND JOHN SADLER. VOL. VI. Xondon Issued to the Subscribers by Phillimore & Co., 124, Chancery Lane. 1908. PREFACE. In this volume are printed the Marriage entries in the Registers of eleven parishes— six of which commence in the sixteenth century ; three in the seventeenth ; and the remaining two in the early years of the eighteenth. Once more evidence is afforded of the risks to which these important records have been exposed in the past. At Great Somerford the earlier Register has been lost as the result of a fire in 170^ at the house of the Parish Clerk; presumably the volume was kept there, for a memorandum in the earliest Register at present remaining states that it "was burnt with ye house." One naturally turns to the Transcripts supposed to have been sent regularly to the Bishop, and from this source the records of twenty-eight Marriages have been obtained ; but unfortunately the transcripts for the whole period have not been found. The Register of Little Somerford begins a year later, 1708, but there is no explanation of the absence of the earlier volume. At Patney a different kind of danger is reported. There the Register, which was begun in 1592, was "found by chance in parsson Biggs his garden 1635", and the entries were transcribed into the present earliest volume. -
Chaucer Blackwell Companions to Literature and Culture
A New Companion to Chaucer Blackwell Companions to Literature and Culture This series offers comprehensive, newly written surveys of key periods and movements and certain major authors, in English literary culture and history. Extensive volumes provide new perspectives and positions on contexts and on canonical and post‐canonical texts, orientating the beginning student in new fields of study and providing the experi- enced undergraduate and new graduate with current and new directions, as pioneered and developed by leading scholars in the field. Published Recently 78. A Companion to American Literary Studies Edited by Caroline F. Levander and Robert S. Levine 79. A New Companion to the Gothic Edited by David Punter 80. A Companion to the American Novel Edited by Alfred Bendixen 81. A Companion to Literature, Film, and Adaptation Edited by Deborah Cartmell 82. A Companion to George Eliot Edited by Amanda Anderson and Harry E. Shaw 83. A Companion to Creative Writing Edited by Graeme Harper 84. A Companion to British Literature, 4 volumes Edited by Robert DeMaria, Jr., Heesok Chang, and Samantha Zacher 85. A Companion to American Gothic Edited by Charles L. Crow 86. A Companion to Translation Studies Edited by Sandra Bermann and Catherine Porter 87. A New Companion to Victorian Literature and Culture Edited by Herbert F. Tucker 88. A Companion to Modernist Poetry Edited by David E. Chinitz and Gail McDonald 89. A Companion to J. R. R. Tolkien Edited by Stuart D. Lee 90. A Companion to the English Novel Edited by Stephen Arata, Madigan Haley, J. Paul Hunter, and Jennifer Wicke 91. -
The Newsletter of Trinity College Oxford | Winter 2009
The Newsletter of Trinity College Oxford | Winter 2009 | Chapel Choir | College manuscripts | Trinity chefs | Old Members' news | qeb=mobpfabkq n a university where the nation’s most prominent atheist is in Iresidence, it might seem odd to muse about dons’ private hell. Yet putting Richard Dawkins’ views to one side for the moment and taking soundings of how Oxford’s tutorial fellows would not like to spend eternity, I’m sure that a 24/7, 365 days a year admissions process would score highly. For both applicants and interviewers the process is usually stressful, though many (admittedly successful) candidates assure me that they enjoyed the experience. (I keep an eye on these burgeoning masochists.) For the tutors, wading through on average between four and five times the number of applications as there are places is a heavy and, for once to use the adjective without exaggeration, I make no apology for dwelling on the admissions process. It awesome responsibility. Once the tutors have made their decision, generates more myths than the Ancient Greeks managed and is one balancing exam results real and projected with the personal of the sticks used most often to beat Oxford by the ill-informed or statements, references, tests (increasingly used to supplement other the ill-intentioned. The Laura Spence affair was of course the locus information) and the interview itself, the outcome has to be classicus of both schools. Among the many myths, here are a couple communicated as quickly as possible but, above all, accurately. At of facts. Nobody is discriminated against in the admissions Trinity, the Senior Tutor and her team in the College Office triple process – other than on academic potential. -
Sorted by County, Then Plaintiff
CP40/ Hilary 1135 1548 For text go to the AALT: http://aalt.law.uh.edu by Rosemary Simons Frame Side County Action Plaintiff Defendant 164 f [illegible] concord Bennett, Thomas; Heron, John, gent Dorothea, his wife 2454 d alias? debt Bonner, Edward, Bishop Popley, William, of Chittern All Saynts, of London Wilts, gent 186 f Beds trespass: Awerthe, George, esq; Clamber alias Hulsey, John, of close(?) Butler, Edward, gent Dunstaple, husbandman 1650 d Beds debt Balderne, John Bryan alias Fawkener, William, of Dunstaple, innholder 45 f Beds debt Barnardyston, George, Dey, John of Bolnest, yeoman administrator of; (Barnardyston, John) 1962 d Beds debt Bray alias Hall, William, Chace, Thomas, of Little Graunsdem, of Bykelswade, maltman Hunts, husbandman; Scotte, Thomas, of Eyton, yeoman 1658 d Beds debt Cave, Anthony, of Ryley, Robert, of Leighton Buzard, glover; Tyckford, Bucks, esq Gray, Thomas, of Leighton Buzard, tanner 859 f Beds trespass: Cobbe, William Barenger, Thomas, of Sharnebroke, close laborer; Gregorye, William, of Sharnebroke, laborer 1958 d Beds debt Danyell, Edward Pedder, Thomas; Pedder, Robert execution 179 f Beds debt Denell, John Perott, William, of Lygrave, Luton, husbandman; Mademale, Richard, of Whippesnade, husbandman 512 f Beds debt Dyve, Lewis, esq Manyngham, John, of Baldok, Herts, draper; Manyngham, of Luton, draper 504 f Beds debt Fetherston, John, brother Fetherston, Thomas, of Potten, vicar, of Thomas executor of; (Atkynson, Thomas, of Lydlyngton, tanner) 187 f Beds debt Flecher alias Cooke, Smyth, William, of -
The Registers of Wath-Upon-Dearne, Yorkshire
M. U Gc 942.74019 W333W 1325194 GENEAL.CGY COL-L-ECTION I'n'lM'^lllSm'Mril/. PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00721 5046 tibe publications ot tbc l^orksbire Parisb IRcGistev Sodetig IDol. 14. 50sue5 to Sttb0cr(bec0 tor tbe J^ear 1902. XLhc IReoisters of Math ^ upon^^earne l?or[?0bire Baptisms anb Burials, 1598—1778 nDarriages, 1598—1779 TRANSCRIBED AND EDITED BY J. W. CLAY, F.S.A. PRIVATELY PRINTED FOR THE YORKSHIRE PARISH REGISTER SOCIETY T902. W. H. MILNES, PRINTER, WAKEFIELD. 1325191 f^ PREFACE. \ The First Volume, containing Baptisms, Marriages, and Burials, consists of three parchment volumes of unequal size bound together. first has entries from The 1598 to 1629, 7^ by 13^ inches ; the second, from 1630 to 1652, 9 by 13^ inches; the third, 1652 to 1724, 6^ by 15 inches. It has been badly bound, the leaves not being in consecutive order. In addition the entries in the third part are very ^ mixed up, so it has been considered the best plan to place them all in their proper yearly order. The edges of many of the leaves are much frayed, which makes the deciphering sometimes difficult. The Second Volume, also parchment, contains the Baptisms and Burials, 1725 to 1778, and the Marriages, 1725 to 1753. The Third Volume is solely Marriages, 1754 to August, 1779, and is paper with the modern printed forms. The thanks of the Society are due to the Vicar (the Rev. H. W, Ward, M.A.) for allowing the Register to be printed and also for the kind way he has assisted the Editor. -
The Archdeacons of Leicester, 1092-1992 by Terence Y
The Archdeacons of Leicester, 1092-1992 by Terence Y. Cocks The Archdeaconry of Leicester was founded in or shortly before 1092 by Remigius, first bishop of Lincoln. It formed part of the diocese of Lincoln until 1839, when it was transferred to that of Peterborough, with which it remained until the bishopric of Leicester was restored in 1926. In extent the archdeaconry was practically co-terminous with the county of Leicester, until 1921 when it was pivided and the archdeaconry of Loughborough was formed. Archdeacons .were the bishop's principal administrative officers, and for centuries the position was one of considerable prestige, influence and wealth (the last not always acquired by praiseworthy methods) . Consequently archdeaconries were often held by men who were already prominent or who later became so. This is certainly the case with that of Leicester, which over the centuries has been held by clerics who achieved celebrity in a variety of ways: scholars, social reformers, future bishops and senior churchmen, and, prior to the Reformation, statesmen. This paper deals with the careers of the archdeacons themselves and their achievements in other spheres rather than with their archidiaconal activities. The present-day bishopric of Leicester was established by an Order in Council dated 5 November (effective 12 November) 1926. The see must therefore be regarded as one of recent creation, though there had been nine Saxon bishops of Leicester and three suffragan bishops (in the diocese of Peterborough) who bore the title between 1888 and 1926. 1 Far different is the case of the archdeaconry of Leicester, which is one of the oldest in the Church of England; the year 1992 is taken as marking its 900th anniversary. -
The Royal Funerary and Burial Ceremonies of Medieval English Kings
The Royal Funerary and Burial Ceremonies of Medieval English Kings, 1216-1509 Anna M. Duch Doctor of Philosophy University of York History May 2016 2 Abstract When Ernst Kantorowicz published The King’s Two Bodies in 1957, far greater importance was placed upon the body politic, the office of King, than on the body natural, the king as a man. In part, this thesis sets out to overturn this notion: the royal corpse was the central and most vital element of the royal funerary and burial ceremonies, and concern for the royal body and its soul lasted for centuries. Although the King always lived, the mortal king did not become inert or null upon death. The English royal funeral has been understudied. The practical mechanics of English kings’ funerals (including the preservation of the body, the role of the Church, and the events of the ceremonies) have not been laid out clearly. This thesis seeks to update the analysis of both individual kingly funerals and the overarching development of royal exequies over three centuries, from John in 1216 to Henry VII in 1509. It is my argument that the language used in the royal prescriptive funerary and burial texts permitted individual variation based on personal preferences, the unique circumstances of the death, and the requirements of the Church for a Christian burial. The royal prescriptive texts were elastic, enabling a wide variety of kings during the medieval period to be laid to rest fittingly and honorably, according to their station. These prescriptive texts did not cover commemoration, an omission that allowed flexibility in celebrating the legacy of a deceased king.