2016 AFL-CIO Endorsed Candidates Federal State Senate Wisconsin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

2016 AFL-CIO Endorsed Candidates Federal State Senate Wisconsin

2016 AFL-CIO Endorsed Candidates Federal State Senate President Hillary Clinton SD 02 John Powers US Senate Russ Feingold SD 04 Lena Taylor Congress SD 06 LaTonya Johnson WI 02 Mark Pocan SD 10 Diane Odeen WI 04 Gwen Moore SD 12 Bryan Van Stippen WI 06 Sarah Lloyd SD 14 Brian Smith WI 07 Mary Hoeft SD 16 Mark Miller WI 08 Thomas Nelson SD 18 Mark Harris SD 22 Robert Wirch SD 24 Julie Lassa SD 26 Fred Risser SD 30 Dave Hansen SD 32 Jennifer Shilling Wisconsin Assembly AD 01 Lynn Utesch AD 39 Jim Zahn AD 68 Howard White AD 04 Tony Lee AD 40 Dmitri Martin AD 70 Mark Holbrook AD 05 Sam Kelly AD 42 George Ferriter AD 71 Katrina Shankland AD 07 Daniel Riemer AD 43 Don Vruwink AD 72 David Gorski AD 08 JoCasta Zamarripa AD 44 Debra Kolste AD 73 Nick Milroy AD 09 Josh Zepnick AD 45 Mark SpreitZer AD 74 Beth Meyers AD 10 David Bowen AD 46 Gary Hebl AD 75 Joe Huftel AD 12 Fred Kessler AD 47 Jimmy Anderson AD 76 Chris Taylor AD 14 Chris Rockwood AD 48 Melissa Sargent AD 77 Terese Berceau AD 16 Leon Young AD 49 Jesse Bennett AD 78 Lisa Subeck AD 17 David Crowley AD 50 Art Shrader AD 79 Dianne Hesselbein AD 18 Evan Goyke AD 51 Jeff Wright AD 80 Sondy Pope AD 19 Jonathan Brostoff AD 52 Paul CZisny AD 81 Dave Considine AD 20 Christine Sinicki AD 54 Gordon HintZ AD 85 Mandy Wright AD 21 Jack Redmond AD 55 Bob Baker AD 86 Nancy Stencil AD 25 Ronald Kossik AD 56 Mariana Stout AD 87 EliZabeth Riley AD 28 Jeff Peterson AD 57 Amanda Stuck AD 88 Noah Reif AD 29 Scottie Ard AD 60 David Pelikan AD 89 Heidi Fencl AD 30 Scott Nelson AD 61 Amee Janus AD 90 Eric Genrich AD 31 Clinton Anderson AD 63 Andy Mitchell AD 91 Dana Wachs AD 32 Christine Welcher AD 64 Peter Barca AD 92 Chris Danou AD 33 Brandon White AD 65 Tod Ohnstad AD 94 Steve Doyle AD 37 Jordan Turner AD 66 Cory Mason AD 95 Jill Billings AD 38 Scott Michalak AD 67 Dennis Hunt AD 96 Alicia Leinberger M I ILW N W AUKEE • MADISO.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Epigraphic Evidence for Boundary Disputes in the Roman Empire
EPIGRAPHIC EVIDENCE FOR BOUNDARY DISPUTES IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE by Thomas Elliott A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2004 Approved by _____________________________________ Advisor: Professor Richard Talbert _____________________________________ Reader: Professor Jerzy Linderski _____________________________________ Reader: Professor Mary Boatwright _____________________________________ Reader: Professor George Houston _____________________________________ Reader: Professor Melissa Bullard ii This page intentionally left blank. iii © 2004 Thomas Elliott ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iv This page intentionally left blank. v ABSTRACT THOMAS ELLIOTT: Epigraphic Evidence for Boundary Disputes in the Roman Empire (Under the direction of Richard Talbert) This dissertation presents all published Greek and Latin epigraphic documents relating to internal boundary disputes of the Roman empire. In date, it spans the period from 2 BC to the third century AD. Spatially, the documents derive from 12 provinces ( Achaia, Africa, Asia, Baetica, Cilicia, Creta et Cyrene, Dalmatia, Iudaea, Lusitania, Macedonia, Moesia and Syria ), plus Italy. The presentation of each includes a text, English translation, bibliography and commentary. Analytical chapters expand upon recent published work by G. Burton and B. Campbell. Terminological analysis permits classification of epigraphic and literary evidence into five categories: boundary disputes, restoration of public and sacred lands, other land disputes, the assignment of boundaries and other authoritative demarcations involving Roman officials. The analysis also provides a more focused definition of several Latin and Greek words that indicate the delivery of a verdict by a Roman official ( decretum, sententia, iudicium, ἀποφάσις, κρίσις, ἐπικρίμα ).
[Show full text]
The Reforms of Trajan and the End of the Pre–Neronian Denarius
AIIN, 61 (2015), pp. 21–42 THE REFORMS OF TRAJAN AND THE END OF THE PRE–NERONIAN DENARIUS Numismatists habitually attribute the creation of Roman imperial coinage to Augustus, and commonly refer to imperial currency as ‘Augustan’.1 Consequently any changes to the imperial coinage tend to be regarded as adulterations of this original ‘Augustan system’. The changes that took place under Nero, for example, are usually treated as the first signs of thoughtless manipulation of this system, and in addition these changes are understood as evidence of the empire’s financial weakness.2 The same is claimed of Trajan’s changes to the denarius and aureus.3 However, other interpretations of these changes are possible, and this paper attempts to set out evidence to support the argument that the Neronian and Trajanic reforms are linked, and that both were attempts to establish a stable currency. It is quite clear that Nero’s role in establishing a stable currency has been understated or completely misunderstood. Thanks to new compositional and metrological studies it is now possible to appreciate the importance of the Neronian reforms.4 It was the Neronian aureus and denarius standards, and not the Augustan, that persisted through the first and second centuries. As far as the precious metal issues are concerned, the Neronian coinage marked the beginning of a new era. Subsequent emperors continued to maintain these standards (with one 1 HARL 1996: 73–96. 2 CRAWFORD 1978: 151–2; WALKER 1978: 110–14; DUNCAN–JONES 1994: 221 n. 35. 3 BOLIN 1958: 201; WALKER 1978: 151–3.
[Show full text]
Numbers 1 to 100
Numbers 1 to 100 PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 02:36:24 UTC Contents Articles −1 (number) 1 0 (number) 3 1 (number) 12 2 (number) 17 3 (number) 23 4 (number) 32 5 (number) 42 6 (number) 50 7 (number) 58 8 (number) 73 9 (number) 77 10 (number) 82 11 (number) 88 12 (number) 94 13 (number) 102 14 (number) 107 15 (number) 111 16 (number) 114 17 (number) 118 18 (number) 124 19 (number) 127 20 (number) 132 21 (number) 136 22 (number) 140 23 (number) 144 24 (number) 148 25 (number) 152 26 (number) 155 27 (number) 158 28 (number) 162 29 (number) 165 30 (number) 168 31 (number) 172 32 (number) 175 33 (number) 179 34 (number) 182 35 (number) 185 36 (number) 188 37 (number) 191 38 (number) 193 39 (number) 196 40 (number) 199 41 (number) 204 42 (number) 207 43 (number) 214 44 (number) 217 45 (number) 220 46 (number) 222 47 (number) 225 48 (number) 229 49 (number) 232 50 (number) 235 51 (number) 238 52 (number) 241 53 (number) 243 54 (number) 246 55 (number) 248 56 (number) 251 57 (number) 255 58 (number) 258 59 (number) 260 60 (number) 263 61 (number) 267 62 (number) 270 63 (number) 272 64 (number) 274 66 (number) 277 67 (number) 280 68 (number) 282 69 (number) 284 70 (number) 286 71 (number) 289 72 (number) 292 73 (number) 296 74 (number) 298 75 (number) 301 77 (number) 302 78 (number) 305 79 (number) 307 80 (number) 309 81 (number) 311 82 (number) 313 83 (number) 315 84 (number) 318 85 (number) 320 86 (number) 323 87 (number) 326 88 (number)
[Show full text]
THE KING and I: the HISTORICAL SETTING of REVELATION 1:9 and the APOSTLE JOHN on PATMOS Gordon Franz 41 Garwood Rd. Fair Lawn, N
THE KING AND I: THE HISTORICAL SETTING OF REVELATION 1:9 AND THE APOSTLE JOHN ON PATMOS Gordon Franz 41 Garwood Rd. Fair Lawn, NJ 07410 (201) 797-6359 Emperor Domitian, the self-proclaimed "Lord and God",' became more superstition toward the last few years of his life (AD 90-96). On the day before his murder, he consulted an astrologer. He also was consulting Apollo, the god of music and poetry, and in addition the god of light, truth and prophecy! The emperor minted coins depicting Apollo on one side and a raven, a bird associated with prophecy, on the reverse side (Jones 1990:266) . One could tell the future by watching this bird's flight (Kanitz 1973-74:47), so Domitian looked to it to foretell his immediate future. Ironically, Suetonius, a Roman historian and senator, records, "A few months before he (Domitian) was killed, a raven perched on the Capitalium and cried, 'All will be well,' an omen which some interpreted as follows: '... a raven ... could not say "It is well," only declared "It will be."" (Domitian 23:2; 1992:385). Emperor Domitian died soon after and all was well! The Apostle John, exiled on the island of Patmos about AD 95, received a more sure word of prophecy. Not from a raven, nor Apollo, but from the Lord Jesus Christ Himself. The Book of the Revelation begins, "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show His servants – things which must shortly take place" (Rev. 1:1). He goes on to say, "Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written in it; for the time is near" (Rev.
[Show full text]
On the Cusp of an Era
On the Cusp of an Era BIAL-18-srinivasan_CS2.indd i 16-3-2007 14:55:12 Brill’s Inner Asian Library Editors Nicola di Cosmo Devin Deweese Caroline Humphrey VOLUME 18 BIAL-18-srinivasan_CS2.indd ii 16-3-2007 14:55:12 On the Cusp of an Era Art in the Pre-Kuß§Öa World Edited by Doris Meth Srinivasan LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 BIAL-18-srinivasan_CS2.indd iii 16-3-2007 14:55:13 On the cover: Lavender Flowers near Maimana. © Luke Powell This book is printed on acid-free paper. ISSN 1566-7162 ISBN 978 90 04 15451 3 © Copyright 2007 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. printed in the netherlands BIAL-18-srinivasan_CS2.indd iv 16-3-2007 14:55:13 CONTENTS Chapter One Pre-Kußà»a Art: A New Concept ................ 1 Doris Meth Srinivasan Chapter Two Pathways Between Gandhàra and North India during Second Century B.C.–Second Century A.D. ........................................................................ 29 Saifur Rahman Dar Chapter Three Passages to India: •aka and Kußà»a Migrations in Historical Contexts .......................................
[Show full text]
The Logistics of the Roman Army at War (264 B.C. - A.D
THE LOGISTICS OF THE ROMAN ARMY AT WAR (264 B.C. - A.D. 235) JONATHAN P. ROTH BRILL THE LOGISTICS OF THE ROMAN ARMY AT WAR (264 B.C. - A.D. 235) COLUMBIA STUDIES IN THE CLASSICAL TRADITION under the direction of WILLIAM V. HARRIS (Editor) • PAUL OSKAR KRISTELLER EUGENE F. RICE, JR. • ALAN CAMERON JAMES A. COULTER • RICHARD BRILLIANT SUZANNE SAID VOLUME XXIII THE LOGISTICS OF THE ROMAN ARMY AT WAR (264 B.C. - A.D. 235) BY JONATHAN P. ROTH BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON • KÖLN 1999 This book is printed on acid -free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roth, Jonathan, 1955– The logistics of the Roman army at war (264 B.C.-A.D. 235) / by Jonathan P. Roth. p. cm. — (Columbia studies in the classical tradition, ISSN 0166-1302 ; v. 23) Includes bibliographical references and indexes. ISBN 9004112715 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Rome—Army—Supplies and stores. 2. Rome—Army– –Transportation—Equipment and supplies. 3. Logistics. 4. Rome– –History, Military—265-30 B.C. 5. Rome—History, Military—30 B.C.-476 A.D. I. Title. II. Series. DG89.R675 1998 355.4’11’0937—dc21 98–42368 CIP Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Roth, Jonathan P.: The logistics of the Roman army at war : (264 b.c. - a.d. 235) / by Jonathan P. Roth. – Leiden ; Boston ; Köln : Brill, 1998 (Columbia studies in the classical tradition ; Vol. 23) ISBN 90–04–11271–5 ISSN 0166-1302 ISBN 90 04 11271 5 © Copyright 1999 by The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York All rights reserved.
[Show full text]
The Movement and Emplacement of the Legions and Auxiliary Units of The
THE LEGIONS AND AUXILIARY UNITS IN MOESIA THE MOVEMENT AND EMPLACEMENT OF THE LEGIONS AND AUXILIARY UNITS OF THE ROMAN ARMY IN MOESIA FROM 29 BC TO AD 235 By CONOR WHATELY, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Alis McMaster University © Copyright by Conar Whately, September 2005 MASTER OF ARTS (2005) MCMASTER UNIVERSITY (Classics) HAMILTON, ONTARIO TITLE: The Movement and Emplacement of the Legions and Auxiliary units of the Roman Army in Moesia from 29 BC to AD 235 AUTHOR: Conar Whately, B.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. E. Haley NUMBER OF PAGES: viii, 137 ABSTRACT This thesis is a history of the legions and auxiliary units of the Roman province of Moesia from 29 BC to AD 235. Sorne of the principal battles and campaigns undetiaken in the area are discussed; however, the focus of the study is the movement of those units both in and out of the province, and also their emplacement, where possible, in the numerous forts so far found in Moesia. A variety of different types of evidence are used: inscriptions, and in particular stone inscriptions and the bronze diplomas are the most valuable sources; the ancient authors are impOliant, and Tacitus, Josephus, Cassius Dio, and Ptolemy are the most valuable, although others are used. There are a handful of conclusions drawn from this study. Generally, during the Julio Claudian period military units tended to cluster around each other. In the second and third centuries, they are more spread out, and tend to be fairly evenly distributed along the Danube.
[Show full text]
Jerusalem in the First Millennium Ad: Stratigraphy Vs
1 Gunnar HEINSOHN [May 2021] JERUSALEM IN THE FIRST MILLENNIUM AD: STRATIGRAPHY VS. THE SCHOLARLY BELIEF IN ANNO DOMINI CHRONOLOGY For Ruthie LAHAV, Tony RIGG, and Dori DERDIKMAN who gave me a home when I came to JERUSALEM. I Can Jerusalem substantiate the 700 years missing in the strata of first millennium Rome, Ravenna, or Constantinople? 2 II Jerusalem’s enigmatic periods of walls without gates and of gates without walls. 5 III Two attacks of Gallus and the repetition of 1-66 AD during 284-350/51 AD. 21 IV Umayyad Iliya and Hadrian’s Aelia. 46 V Severan power and Justinian’s arch itecture in Jerusalem's final blossoming before the Tenth Century Collapse. 88 VI Conclusion [summarizing table on page 111] 107 VII Bibliography 112 Appx 1 Synopsis of same events in Roman and Jewish history that were artificially separated by 284 AD-years [by Jan Beaufort]. 119 Appx 2 Theodosian wall builders: Eudocia and Audofleda 122 Address and acknowledgements 124 2 I. CAN JERUSALEM SUBSTANTIATE THE 700 YEARS MISSING IN THE STRATA OF FIRST MILLENNIUM ROME, RAVENNA, OR CONSTANTINOPLE? Alert readers of former texts of the author (in https://q-mag.org/the-1st-millennium-ad-chronology-controversy.html) let him know that the excavators of Rome may be right that the city did not build any new housing between the 230s and 930s AD, which is why hard evidence is lacking even for the wealthiest and mightiest (see illustration below; Heinsohn 2018a). No residential quarters, latrines, aqueducts, sewers, roads, ports, fast food eateries (thermopolia), bakeries, etc.
[Show full text]
Introduction
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87238-6 - A Concise History of Romania Keith Hitchins Excerpt More information Introduction The 2,000 years of history of a people tempts the writer, and the reader, to seek out long-term trends to provide guidance through complex and contradictory evolutions. So it is with the history of the Romanians. From medieval times to the early twentieth century they followed stages similar to those of other nations in Eastern Europe and even of Europe as a whole: feudalism, of a sort, and a mainly agricultural economy and rural society, until the nine- teenth century, and, then, down to the First World War, the transi- tion, slow at the beginning, to an industrial economy and an urban society, where agriculture and the village nonetheless predomi- nated. All the while, from the eighteenth century, the shape of a modern Romanian nation, intellectually at least, was taking form. Then came the interwar period, only twenty years long, when the modernization impulses accelerated, and then, for forty years, came the Communists, who pursued modernization with methods and goals of their own. The post-Communist years offer hints that the Romanians may once again be headed along the path taken two centuries earlier. What especially may defi ne the Romanians over the long term is their place between East and West. It grants the writer a wide perspective from which to arrange the events of their history. They confronted the dilemma of choice between these two poles from the beginning of their statehood in the fourteenth century, when the principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia were founded.
[Show full text]
87 PS 108 Philip J
007/78 g Bronx 108/82 007/78 House 009/78 056/78 037/78 040/78 g 001/80 Grace Dodge 025/80 027/80 023/80 024/80 064/78 Vocational HS 093/80 030/80 062/78 008/78 B 026/80 r o n x 2 P 1 a 4 r 0 k 006/78 029/80 055/78 E g 093/87 PS 108 Philip J. d AD 78 R Abinanti n to 2 s 1 003/80 002/80 o 2 B 0 1 0 0 y 1 w G r e AD 80 052/82 v 022/80 i R x n 2 005/78 o 0 r 2 020/80 6 B 0 010/78 6 PS 105 Sen 6 7 Abraham 021/80 028/80 Bernstein 004/78 d 004/80 R 2 g d l 0 r 2 5 0 o 0 5 W 7 e 070/78 l g g n PS 32 u 017/80 003/78 J Hutchinson 072/86 016/80 019/80 River Community gCenter W 005/80 h i 001/79 t e 2 P 055/82 0 l 0 a y 1 i 001/78 n AD 86 w s k 7 d 042/78 R 1 P R 9 d 0 1 t r r 2 9 e o 1 v 018/80 i p n R o i 049/86 069/78 x n n U o 006/80 1 r 9 059/82 B 9 8 1 8 9 1 y 64 d S 1 w ag R am G o re 665 015/80 058/82 d r S l 63 t e r 8 007/80 v o i R 002/78 W 682 011/80 7 x e 1 4 l 6 n 6 9 4 g 9 o e 0 1 1 9 n r 5 057/78 v 1 9 g u B A PS 57 087/79 1 J l PS 83 Adult l 039/82 Crescent a E h g Annex Behavioral c 1 r 8 i 2 B Health Center S t 1 0 9 1 1 0 B 0 9 r 0 g 067/79 0 002/79 o 8 1 n 2 0 9 1 9 1 x 1 P 0 8 a 057/82 4 2 r 1 0 k 2 S 090/87 665 V ve i r A c 010/80 1 018/87 41 e t 8 6 d 4 o 85 4 6 n 66 1 1 la r 1 e 1 2 1 0 in 8 h 8 S 4 R 6 1 8 6 08 6 A 2 t 3 5 2 0 3 0 m 1 2 e 1 H 1720 8 3 o t 5 9 h 1 E 1 1 r 003/87 0 2 n e y 0 1 0 a 9 1 8 v s Mayflower 1 1 3 d 3 1 013/80 2 1 t 1 a 1 A 8 S 1 8 2 y 2 9 8 004/79 5 t 8 3 8 0 0 S 0 6 P l 3 0 1 091/87 0 l 4 0 0 Terrace l 1 t 8 e 1 0 8 2 0 6 w 1 1 y y 003/79 1 e 3 n w 1 k g 8 o 119/82 2 1 9 1 6 P 0 H 0 3 2 0 3 8 001/87
[Show full text]
CHURCH and ROMAN LAW © Copyright by Wydawnictwo KUL
© Copyright by Wydawnictwo KUL CHURCH AND ROMAN LAW © Copyright by Wydawnictwo KUL Publications of the Faculty of Law, Canon Law and Administration of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin Volume 1 EDITORIAL BOARD Piotr Stanisz (Chair) Artur Kuś Paweł Smoleń Delaine Swenson Stanisław Tymosz Stanisław Wrzosek © Copyright by Wydawnictwo KUL Antoni Dębiński CHURCH AND ROMAN LAW Wydawnictwo KUL Lublin 2010 © Copyright by Wydawnictwo KUL English translation Konrad Szulga Revision and proofreading Jan Kobyłecki Cover design Agnieszka Gawryszuk All pictures by courtesy of the University Library of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin This book has been published with the financial assistance of: the Faculty of Law, Canon Law and Administration of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin and the Educational Foundation © Copyright by Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin 2010 ISBN 978-83-7702-012-8 PUBLISHER Wydawnictwo KUL PRINTING AND BINDING ul. Zbożowa 61, 20-827 Lublin elpil tel. 81 740-93-40, fax 81 740-93-50 ul. Artyleryjska 11 e-mail: [email protected] 08-110 Siedlce http:// wydawnictwo.kul.lublin.pl e-mail: [email protected] © Copyright by Wydawnictwo KUL CONTENTS ________________________________________ List of Abbreviations ........................................... 7 Foreword .................................................... 9 CHAPTER ONE THE AREAS OF INTERPENETRATION 1. Legal Dualism............................................... 17 2. Imperial Legislation Serving the Church ........................... 28 3. Ecclesiastical Canons and Imperial leges ........................... 38 4. Ecclesia vivit lege Romana?..................................... 44 CHAPTER TWO THE ALLURE OF ROMAN LAW 5. The Development of Legal Science between the 11th and 13th Centuries . 65 6. Reception of Roman Law by the Church .......................... 82 7. Prohibition of Roman Law Studies from the 12th through the 13th Century 97 CHAPTER THREE A RESPECTFUL RESERVE 8.
[Show full text]
Reconsidering the Date of John's Gospel
Reconsidering the Date of John’s Gospel by Thomas L. Stegall Introduction The date when the Gospel of John was written is normally considered to be of little theological consequence or concern to most Christians. However, this subject merits a fresh survey of the evidence in order to address the lingering theories of liberal critical scholarship in addition to the recent claims of some Free Grace evangelicals that John is the only evangelistic book in the Bible and that it was written extremely early in church history.1 In addition, if a second century date is permitted for the composition of John in its final form as claimed by some critical, non-evangelical scholars,2 then the historical reliability and divine authority of the book is automatically impugned. Conversely, on the opposite end of the spectrum, if a timeframe as early as the 30s-45 A.D. is accepted for the completion of John, it may lend support to the view that this book has theological-evangelistic priority and preeminence within the New Testament canon. This article will therefore reinvestigate the question of John’s date by first reviewing the rationale of critical, unbelieving scholarship for a very late date that extends into the second century. The bulk of the article will then weigh the evidence for the two main views held by current New Testament scholarship— the more popular later-date view of the 80s-90s and the less common pre-70 view. This will be followed by an assessment of the extremely early 30s-45 view. A reexamination of the evidence demonstrates that a reasonable range of dates may be maintained anywhere from the 60s-90s, with the weight of the evidence tipping slightly in favor of a pre-70 date.
[Show full text]