DOCSLIB.ORG

Wisconsin Legislative Almanac

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Wisconsin Legislative Almanac The Road to Election data for all 132 Wisconsin legislative districts By Joe Handrick @joeminocqua “Joe Handrick is the best Wisconsin political numbers guy in Legislative Wisconsin and the 2020 Almanac is a must-have for Almanac political junkies." The Road to ~~ Dan O’Donnell, Award-winning broadcaster Contents Introduction Page 1 How Districts Are Classified in This Almanac — Explaining the three multi-race composites State Assembly Page 2 The Big Picture—State Assembly Page 3 State Assembly—The Total and Likely Range of Seats That Can Be Won By Either Party Page 4—51 Assembly Republicans — Profiles of individual districts held by GOP Page 52 The Trump Effect, as seen in safe GOP seats Page 53 State Assembly — Safe DEM Seats Page 54—60 Assembly Democrats — Profiles of individual districts held by DEMs State Senate Page 61 The Big Picture — State Senate Page 62 State Senate — The Total and Likely Range of Seats That Can Be Won By Either Party Page 63—68 Senate Republicans — Profiles of individual districts held by GOP Page 69 State Senate — Safe Seats and ODD Numbered Seats (not up for re-election in 2020) Pages 70—72 Senate Democrats — Profiles of individual districts held by DEMs Summary Page 73 Summary — Pathways to Majority Page 1 How Districts Are Classified In This Almanac To the right are the color codes and percentages used throughout this Safe GOP 58% GOP and up Safe DEM 42% GOP and below Almanac. Unless otherwise noted, all Strong GOP 55—57% GOP Strong DEM 43—45% GOP percentages are expressed in terms of the Republican share of the vote. Lean GOP 53—54% GOP Lean DEM 46-—47% GOP There are 3 distinct multi-race composites given for each district: A Highly Competitive 48—52% Pre-2015 Composite, A Post-2015 Composite, and A Generic Composite. “How Republican (or Democrat) is District X?” Explaining the Three Multi-Race Composites In prior editions of this Almanac, we were able to assign each Assembly and Senate district a partisan composite number based on statewide elections over the prior decade. Even as the state would swing back and forth (for example, from the big Doyle DEM win in 2006 to the big Walker GOP win in 2010), the general pattern was relatively predictable: Dane and MKE counties would vote heavy for the DEMs, the WOW counties (Waukesha, Ozaukee, and Washington) would go big for the GOP, and the Fox Valley and western Wisconsin would swing back and forth and choose the winner. This basic pattern still holds to some degree. The arrival of Donald Trump in 2016, however, has altered what a GOP statewide win or a DEM statewide win looks like. Trump’s victory in 2016 was different than anything we had seen before. Compared to past GOP victories, he did poorly in WOW (he still won in WOW, but not by the massive margins of the past). At the same time, Trump did exceptionally well in rural Wisconsin — both in GOP rural areas (such as Vilas county) but also in historically DEM rural areas (such as Ashland and Trempealeau counties). Meanwhile, the Fox Valley has continued to show a tendency to “swing” back and forth and MKE and Dane counties continue to be dark blue. The question in 2020 is whether this new pattern (GOP weaker in suburbs but stronger in rural areas) that we saw in 2016 and 2018 is a permanent re-alignment or will Wisconsin revert to historical patterns after Trump leaves the scene. Polling suggests the new pattern will hold in 2020. Because voting patterns changed so much in 2016, this Almanac provides three composite rankings — • Pre 2015 Composite: A composite built using statewide races from 2012 and 2014. • Post 2015 Composite: A composite of statewide races in the era of Trump — 2016 and 2018. • Generic Composite: A combination of State Treasurer and Secretary of State races from the entire decade. These generic races are the ones least influenced by the personalities of individual candidates and, therefore, are most reflective of the generic GOP/DEM makeup of a district. They do not, however, include any presidential year elections. Because Trump will likely be on the ballot in 2020, it is likely this new pattern will hold in the upcoming election, making the “Post 2015” composite of great use for the 2020 elections. 13th Assembly District To the right is an example of how these three composites are presented Multi-Race Composites for each featured district in the Almanac. This particular seat is a Pre 2015 Post 2015 Generic suburban Milwaukee seat where GOP numbers fell dramatically later in the 59% 51% 55% decade. SAFE HIGHLY STRONG REPUBLICAN COMPETITIVE REPUBLICAN Page 2 The BIG Picture — State Assembly 99 Districts Sorted by the Post- # of Held by Held by Classification Seats GOP DEM 2015 Multi-Race Composite* Safe GOP 30 30 0 (58% and greater GOP) In the 2018 elections, Republicans won all 48 “Post-2015 Composite” Republican seats Strong GOP 12 12 0 (55% - 57% GOP) in the Wisconsin Assembly. Lean GOP 6 6 0 (53% - 54% GOP) Republicans won 14 of 16 highly Highly competitive swing districts. Competitive 16 14 2 (48% - 52%) Republicans also won a strong Lean DEM 1 0 1 (53% - 54% DEM) DEM seat bringing their total in the Assembly to 63 members. Strong DEM 5 1 4 (55% - 57% DEM) Democrats won 34 of 35 Safe DEM 29 0 29 (58% and greater DEM) Democrat seats and 2 highly competitive seats, for a total of 36 TOTAL 99 63 36 99 Districts Sorted by Pre –2015 99 Districts Sorted by Generic Multi-Race Composite* District Composite* # of # of Classification Seats Classification Seats Safe GOP 23 (58% and greater GOP) Safe GOP 29 (58% and greater GOP) Strong GOP 19 (55% - 57% GOP) Strong GOP 15 (55% - 57% GOP) Lean GOP 8 (53% - 54% GOP) Lean GOP 10 (53% - 54% GOP) Highly Highly Competitive 11 (48% - 52%) Competitive 10 (48% - 52%)) Lean DEM 3 (53% - 54% DEM) Lean DEM 0 (53% - 54% DEM) Strong DEM 7 (55% - 57% DEM) Strong DEM 6 (55% - 57% DEM) Safe DEM 28 (58% and greater DEM) Safe DEM 29 (58% and greater DEM) * SEE prior page for description of “Post-2015” , “Pre-2015”, and “Generic” multi-race composites. ASSEMBLY — The Total and Likely Range of... Page 3 ...Seats That Can be Won By Either Party While Democrats and many in the media continue to blame the Democrat’s legislative woes on redistricting, the greater prob- lem for Democrats is their inability to win in competitive districts. Although the map creates more Republican seats than Dem- ocrat seats (due to Democratic voter hyper-concentration), Democrats are capable of winning a majority of districts — they just have not been able to. On this page we use three methods to show the total range and likely range of seats that can be won by either party. Any seat that is not designated as “safe” can be won by either party. However, a win by the opposite party in a “strong” seat is rare and usually involves an abnormal circumstance (such as a scandal). Therefore, the “total range” employed in Method 2 (SEE below) groups the “strong” seats with the “safe” seats for purposes of defining a “total range” of winnable seats. Method 1: Based on statewide elections, 2012-2018 There have been 13 statewide races between 2012 and 2018 (not including the 2012 recall). There are 43 Assembly seats in which the GOP candidate won in all thirteen races and 34 seats in which the DEM candidate won in all thirteen. This leaves 22 districts that have been won by each of the parties in statewide races over the decade. Therefore, using this method: • The total possible GOP range in the Assembly is between 43 and 65 seats. Median = 54 seats. • The total possible DEM range in the Assembly is between 34 and 56 seats. Median = 45 seats. Method 2: Using the “Post 2015 Composite” as presented in this Almanac The GOP low end (Safe GOP plus Strong GOP) is 42 seats while the high end (add in Lean Republican, Highly Competitive and Lean DEM) is 65 seats. Meanwhile the DEM low end (Safe DEM plus Strong DEM) is 34 seats while the DEM high end is 57 seats. Therefore, using this method: • The total possible GOP range in the Assembly is between 42 and 65 seats. Median = 53.5 seats. • The total possible DEM range in the Assembly is between 34 and 57 seats. Median = 45.5 seats Method 3: Based on Districts Actually Won Currently the GOP holds an Assembly district (AD 51) that is only 45% Republican in the Post 2015 Composite. This demonstrates it is possible for either party to win any seat that is 45% or better for that party. If the Republicans won every seat equal to or better than 45% they could be at 65 seats. If the Democrats won every seat equal or better than 45% for their party, they could be at 61 seats. Therefore, using this method: • The total possible GOP range in the Assembly is between 38 and 65 districts. Median = 51.5 seats. • The total possible DEM range in the Assembly is between 34 and 61 districts. Median = 47.5 seats. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ This Almanac is based on the partisan composite that is used in Method 2. Using this method, the TOTAL RANGE Total Range for the GOP is 42 to 65 seats and the Total Range for the Democrats is 34 to 57 seats. The likely range (taking into account incumbency) is, of course, much more narrow than the total LIKELY RANGE range.
Recommended publications
  • Women in Criminal Trials in the Julio-Claudian Era

    Women in Criminal Trials in the Julio-Claudian Era

    Women in Criminal Trials in the Julio-Claudian Era by Tracy Lynn Deline B.A., University of Saskatchewan, 1994 M.A., University of Saskatchewan, 2001 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Classics) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) September 2009 © Tracy Lynn Deline, 2009 Abstract This study focuses on the intersection of three general areas: elite Roman women, criminal law, and Julio-Claudian politics. Chapter one provides background material on the literary and legal source material used in this study and considers the cases of Augustus’ daughter and granddaughter as a backdrop to the legal and political thinking that follows. The remainder of the dissertation is divided according to women’s roles in criminal trials. Chapter two, encompassing the largest body of evidence, addresses the role of women as defendants, and this chapter is split into three thematic parts that concentrate on charges of adultery, treason, and other crimes. A recurring question is whether the defendants were indicted for reasons specific to them or the indictments were meant to injure their male family members politically. Analysis of these cases reveals that most of the accused women suffered harm without the damage being shared by their male family members. Chapter three considers that a handful of powerful women also filled the role of prosecutor, a role technically denied to them under the law. Resourceful and powerful imperial women like Messalina and Agrippina found ways to use criminal accusations to remove political enemies. Chapter four investigates women in the role of witnesses in criminal trials.
  • "Pre-Severan Diplomata and the Problem of 'Special Grants."' In

    "Pre-Severan Diplomata and the Problem of 'Special Grants."' In

    DuSaniC, Slobodan. "Pre-Severan Diplomata and the Problem of 'Special Grants."' In Heer und Integrationspolitik: Die Romischen Militardiplome als historische Quelle, edited by Werner Eck and Hartmut Wolff, 190-240. Koln: Bohlau, 1986. HEER UND INTEGRATIONSPOLITIK Die romischen Militardiplome als historische Quelle herausgegeben von WERNER ECK und HARTMUT WOLFF 1986 BOHLAU VERLAG KOLNWIEN The Problem of 'Special Grants' 191 ly (the exclusion of candidates from the provincial forces) and statisti- cally, and certainly appears more difficult to assess from the stand- point of the radical conception5. The following argumentation is Pre-Severan Diplomata and the Problem centred around the salient points of the radical theory susceptible of of 'Special Grants' modification or improvement when one considers how they have been treated in recent scholarship. Many remaining details will be Von dealt with subsequently, in other places. Slobodan DuSaniC (1) The fundamental difficulty with the (so-called) traditional thesis6,which takes the 'normal' diploma as an automatic reward for every man having spent, in major non-legionary troops, the pre- This paper has been written' in the conviction that the (so-called) scribed term of service (XXV plurave stipendia for the auxiliaries, radical theory, which "postulates that virtually all the constitutions/ XXVI [XXVIIAplurave stipendia for the sailors), arises from the indi- diplomata name only those units/soldiers possessing extraordinary cations that the material known so far (CIL XVI + RMD I + RMD 11) meritu2(mainly participants in expeditiones belli but also in certain markedly deviates from the numbers to be expected in view of the peacetime efforts3 matching, in importance, such expeditions), pro- effectives of certain units, classes of soldiers and provincial armies vides the most economical basis for interpreting the extremely com- plex features of the diplomata militaria as a documentary genre.
  • Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47–410

    Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47–410

    no nonsense Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47–410 – interpretation ltd interpretation Contract number 1446 May 2011 no nonsense–interpretation ltd 27 Lyth Hill Road Bayston Hill Shrewsbury SY3 0EW www.nononsense-interpretation.co.uk Cadw would like to thank Richard Brewer, Research Keeper of Roman Archaeology, Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales, for his insight, help and support throughout the writing of this plan. Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47-410 Cadw 2011 no nonsense-interpretation ltd 2 Contents 1. Roman conquest, occupation and settlement of Wales AD 47410 .............................................. 5 1.1 Relationship to other plans under the HTP............................................................................. 5 1.2 Linking our Roman assets ....................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Sites not in Wales .................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Criteria for the selection of sites in this plan .......................................................................... 9 2. Why read this plan? ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Aim what we want to achieve ........................................................................................... 10 2.2 Objectives.............................................................................................................................
  • Julius Caesar to Caligula)

    Julius Caesar to Caligula)

    Notable instances of intellectual repression in Rome (Julius Caesar to Caligula) NB: Legal bases: • Twelve Tables (450 BC) (TT 8.1, cited by Cicero in Rep. 4.12, p. 79 in your text, who wholeheartedly agrees with the law) prohibited defamatory writings: ‘If any person had sung or composed against another person a song (=poem) such as was causing slander or insult to another…’ Penalty (in 450 BC, evidently) was to be clubbed to death. • maiestas (treason): first introduced 103 BC, underwent a variety of changes, though the important one was the law passed by Julius Caesar (lex Iulia maiestatis, ca. 45 BC) which made banishment the chief penalty. This was the law invoked frequently in the first century of the Principate (notably by Tiberius, but by almost all of his successors as well). Julius Caesar ca. 45 BC: expert on oracles exiled by Julius Caesar Augustus 31 BC(?): Octavian (=Augustus) burns all documents relevant to triumviral period 28 BC: philosopher (Anaxilaos), expert in magic, banished ca. 27 BC: Augustus curtails publication of the acta senatus (‘senatorial record’) ca. 18 BC(?): Augustus forbids publication of anonymous attacks 12 BC: Augustus, now pontifex maximus, burns all oracular books and writings. First known instance of ‘book burning’ (usually done under charge of maiestas) AD 6 (?): Corvus, professor of rhetoric, charged with ‘harming the state’ for discussing birth control and celibacy in his classroom. Outcome of trial unknown. ca. AD 6-8: Titus Labienus, Augustan orator and an historian, has his writings confiscated and burned by senatorial decree (on grounds that his writings were treasonous).
  • A Sarc O P Hagu S F Rom T H E Family of Herodes Atticus

    A Sarc O P Hagu S F Rom T H E Family of Herodes Atticus

    HESPERIA 70 (200I) ICONOG RAPHY Pages46z-492 AND THE DYNAMIGS O F PATRO NAG E A SARCO P HAGU S FROM T H E FAMILYOF HERODESATTICUS ABSTRACT A sarcophagusfiom the estateof HerodesAtticus in Kephisiacommemo- ratesthe intimate connections ofthe familywiththe cityof Sparta,the Battle of Marathon,and the cultstatue of Nemesisat Rhamnous.Theiconographic allusionsto Marathonalso reflect the prioritiesof the SecondSophistic, an intellectualmovement that appealed to the pastto establishcultural and po- liticalsuperiority. The unusualand meaningfill decorative program suggests thatthe family commissioned this sarcophagus. The earlierview that the more unusualAttic sarcophagiwere prefabricated, but that theirthemes simply provedunpopular, should be modifiedin lightof this study. INTRODUCTION In Septemberof 1866,during the construction of a housein the Kephisia suburbof Athens,workers discovered a marbleburial chamber, roughly squarein plan.1Robbers had long since plundered the chamber, removing thedeceased and most ofthe portable possessions. In 1866,the significant remainingartifacts included four carved marble sarcophagi and only a handfillof smallobjects.2 Otto Benndorf,who wrotethe firstcomplete descriptionof the chamberand its contents,was also the firstto suggest 1. I thankthe Universityof Mich- andNeel Smithfor discussing with me this study,still stand in the tomb iganfor support that allowed me to someof the ideaspresented here. Photo- today.Cramped space in the tomb undertakepreliminary research in graphswere kindly provided byJan San- makesit difficultto providea complete Athensfor this article;and the College ders;the BritishMuseum; the Deutsches photographicrecord. I thereforerefer of the Holy Crossboth for funds to ArchaologischesInstitut, Rome; the in manyinstances to the line drawings purchasephotographs and for a leaveof GreekArchaeological Service; and the of the Ledasarcophagus produced by absencethat allowed me to continue KunsthistorischesMuseum, Vienna.
  • Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre

    Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre

    GB 1204 Ch 46 Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 22324 ! National Arc F Kent Archives Offic Ch 46 Watts Charity MSS., 1579-1972 Deposited by Mr. Chinnery, Clerk to the Charity, Rochester, 1st May 1974, and 5th February, 1976 Catalogued by Alison Revell, June 1978 INTRODUCTION For information concerning the establishment of Watts's Charity, under Richard Watts of Rochester's will, in 1579 and its subsequent history, The Report of Commissioners for Inquiring Concerning Charities - Kent, 1815-39 Pp. 504-9, provides most of the basic facts. Other Rochester Charities are dealt with in the same Report (see pages 55-57, and 500-513). The Report also deals with various early legal cases concerning the Charity, and the uses to which its funds should be put, most notably the cases of the parishes of St. Margaret 's Rochester, and Strood, against the parishioners of St. Nicholas in 1680, and of the parishioners of Chatham against the Trustees of the Charity in 1808 (see L1-4B in this catalogue). The original will of Richard Watts, drawn up in 1579 and proved in the following year in the Consistory Court of Rochester, is kept in this Office under the catalogue mark, DRb PW12 (1579), with a registered copy in the volume of registered wills, DRb PWr 16 (ffl05-107). A copy is also catalogued in this collection as Ch46 L1A. Further Watts Charity material is found in the Dean and Chapter of Rochester MSS, under the KAO catalogue number, DRc Cl/1-65, and consists mainly of accounts of the Providers of the Poor of Rochester, between the years 1699 and 1819.
  • In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

    In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

    Case: 17-17531, 04/02/2018, ID: 10821327, DktEntry: 13-1, Page 1 of 111 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WINDING CREEK SOLAR LLC, Case No. 17-17531 Plaintiff-Appellant, On Appeal from the United States v. District Court for the Northern District of California CARLA PETERMAN; MARTHA No. 3:13-cv-04934-JD GUZMAN ACEVES; LIANE Hon. James Donato RANDOLPH; CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN; MICHAEL PICKER, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission, Defendants-Appellees. Case No. 17-17532 WINDING CREEK SOLAR LLC, On Appeal from the United States Plaintiff-Appellee, District Court for the Northern District v. of California No. 3:13-cv-04934-JD CARLA PETERMAN; MARTHA Hon. James Donato GUZMAN ACEVES; LIANE RANDOLPH; CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN; MICHAEL PICKER, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission, Defendants-Appellants. APPELLANT’S FIRST BRIEF ON CROSS-APPEAL Thomas Melone ALLCO RENEWABLE ENERGY LTD. 1740 Broadway, 15th Floor New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (212) 681-1120 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Appellant WINDING CREEK SOLAR LLC Case: 17-17531, 04/02/2018, ID: 10821327, DktEntry: 13-1, Page 2 of 111 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Winding Creek Solar LLC is 100% owned by Allco Finance Limited, which is a privately held company in the business of developing solar energy projects. Allco Finance Limited has no parent companies, and no publicly held company owns 10 percent or more of its stock. /s/ Thomas Melone i Case: 17-17531, 04/02/2018, ID: 10821327, DktEntry: 13-1, Page 3 of 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ...................................................
  • (CSR) BOARD of DIRECTORS MEETING Embassy Suites Hotel

    (CSR) BOARD of DIRECTORS MEETING Embassy Suites Hotel

    SUMMARY OF MOTIONS CALIFORNIA STATE RETIREES (CSR) BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Embassy Suites Hotel - San Francisco Airport, Burlingame February 27, 2014 4. Introductions, Agenda Changes/Corrections and Unscheduled Items CSR 1/14/1 MOTION: Sears, second by Walgenbach – that the CSR Board of Directors accept the agenda as modified. CARRIED. 5. Approval of the November 8, 2013 Meeting Minutes CSR 2/14/1 MOTION: Lease, second by Evans – that the CSR Board of Directors approve the minutes of the November 8, 2013 meeting as printed. CARRIED. 11A. Finance Committee CSR 3/14/1 MOTION: Rose, second by Walgenbach – that each chapter may retain a maximum of twelve months of estimated dues income in its bank account at any one time. When a chapter accumulates a greater amount based upon a quarterly assessment, the chapter shall send the excess funds to the Corporation or the Chief Financial Officer will cause the withholding of further dues payments to the chapter until its total funds falls below the threshold. CARRIED. 11E. PAC Committee CSR 4/14/1 MOTION: Behrens, second by Waggoner – that the CSR Board of Directors endorse the following Assembly incumbents seeking reelection: Ken Cooley (AD 8), Marc Levine (AD 10), Jim Frazier (AD 11), Susan Eggman (AD 13), Susan Bonilla (AD 14), Rob Bonta (AD 18), Phil Ting (AD 19), Bill Quirk (AD 20), Adam Gray (AD 21), Kevin Mullin, AD 22), Rich Gordon (AD 24), Nora Campos, AD 27), Mark Stone (AD 29), Luis Alejo (AD 30), Henry Perea (AD 31), Rudy Salas Jr. (AD 32), Katcho Achadjian (AD 35), Steve Fox (AD 36),
  • Human Rights, Social Welfare, and Greek Philosophy Legitimate

    Human Rights, Social Welfare, and Greek Philosophy Legitimate

    Global Journal of HUMAN-SOCIAL SCIENCE: H Interdisciplinary Volume 15 Issue 8 Version 1.0 Year 2015 Type: Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Inc. (USA) Online ISSN: 2249-460x & Print ISSN: 0975-587X Human Rights, Social Welfare, and Greek Philosophy Legitimate Reasons for the Invasion of Britain by Claudius By Tomoyo Takahashi University of California, United States Abstract- In 43 AD, the fourth emperor of Imperial Rome, Tiberius Claudius Drusus, organized his military and invaded Britain. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the legitimate reasons for The Invasion of Britain led by Claudius. Before the invasion, his had an unfortunate life. He was physically distorted, so no one gave him an official position. However, one day, something unimaginable happened. He found himself selected by the Praetorian Guard to be the new emperor of Roma. Many scholars generally agree Claudius was eager to overcome his physical disabilities and low expectations to secure his position as new Emperor in Rome by military success in Britain. Although his personal motivation was understandable, it was not sufficient enough for Imperial Rome to legitimize the invasion of Britain. It is important to separate personal reasons and official reasons. Keywords: (1) roman, (2) britain, (3) claudius, (4) roman emperor, (5) colonies, (6) slavery, (7) colchester, (8) veterans, (9) legitimacy. GJHSS-H Classification: FOR Code: 180114 HumanRightsSocialWelfareandGreekPhilosophyLegitimateReasonsfortheInvasionofBritainbyClaudius Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of: © 2015. Tomoyo Takahashi. This is a research/review paper, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • The Persecution of Christians in the First Century

    The Persecution of Christians in the First Century

    JETS 61.3 (2018): 525–47 THE PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS IN THE FIRST CENTURY ECKHARD J. SCHNABEL* Abstract: The Book of Acts, Paul’s letters, 1 Peter, Hebrews, and Revelation attest to nu- merous incidents of persecution, which are attested for most provinces of the Roman empire, triggered by a wide variety of causes and connected with a wide variety of charges against the fol- lowers of Jesus. This essay surveys the twenty-seven specific incidents of and general references to persecution of Christians in the NT, with a focus on geographical, chronological, and legal matters. Key words: persecution, mission, hostility, opposition, Jerusalem, Rome, Peter, Paul, Acts, Hebrews, Revelation This essay seeks to survey the evidence in the NT for instances of the perse- cution of Jesus’ earliest followers in their historical and chronological contexts without attempting to provide a comprehensive analysis of each incident. The Greek term diōgmos that several NT authors use, usually translated as “persecu- tion,”1 is defined as “a program or process designed to harass and oppress some- one.”2 The term “persecution” is used here to describe the aggressive harassment and deliberate ill-treatment of the followers of Jesus, ranging from verbal abuse, denunciation before local magistrates, initiating court proceedings to beatings, flog- ging, banishment from a city, execution, and lynch killings. I. PERSECUTION IN JUDEA, SYRIA, AND NABATEA (AD 30–38/40) 1. Persecution in Jerusalem, Judea (I). Priests in Jerusalem, the captain of the tem- ple, and Sadducees arrested the apostles Peter and John who spoke to a crowd of * Eckhard J.
  • 10 Bc 5 Bc 1 Ad 5 10 15 20

    10 Bc 5 Bc 1 Ad 5 10 15 20

    AD 14 AD 18 4 BC AD 4 Augustus Caiaphas Death of King Emperor Augustus Caesar, the fi rst appointed as Herod the formally adopts his emperor of a Jewish High Great of Judea stepson Tiberius as Rome, dies Priest his successor 10 BC 5 BC 1 AD 5 10 15 20 AD 6 7 BC Jesus a� ends Jesus born in Passover in Bethlehem Jerusalem of Judea as a boy (Luke 2:1-20) (Luke 2:40-52) TIMELINE | PAGE 1 AD 26 Pon� us Pilate begins governorship of Judea 25 30 AD 32 AD 31 Jesus miraculously AD 29 Jesus appoints feeds 5000 John the Bap� st’s and sends his (Ma� hew 14:13-33; ministry begins; Jesus apostles on their AD 30 Mark 6:31-52; is bap� zed and begins fi rst mission Jesus a� ends Luke 9:10-17; John 6) his ministry (Ma� hew 9:35- Passover in (Ma� hew 3:1-17; 11:1; Mark 6:6-13; Jerusalem and Mark 1:2-11; Luke 9:1-10) Luke 3:1-23) cleanses the temple (John 2:13-25) AD 32 AD 30 Jesus a� ends Jesus establishes the Feast of his ministry in Tabernacles in Galilee Jerusalem (Ma� hew 4:12-17; (John 7-9) Mark 1:14-15; Luke 4:14-15) TIMELINE | PAGE 2 AD 43 AD 36 AD 37 AD 40 AD 41 Roman Pon� us Pilate Death of Emperor Caligula Emperor Caligula conquest of governorship of Emperor orders a statue of assassinated and Britain begins Judea ends Tiberius himself be erected in Claudius crowned under Emperor the temple; Jewish the new Emperor Claudius peasants stop this from happening 35 40 AD 37 Paul visits Peter and James in Jerusalem (Acts 9:23-30; Gala� ans 1:18-24) AD 38-43 Missions to the Gen� les begin; church in An� och established AD 33 (Acts 10-11) Jesus crucifi ed
  • Biblical Chronology

    Biblical Chronology

    Sept 78 78 38 45 98 180 Aug 77 77 July 75 32 170 76 76 Jun Pentecost 75 75 181 Legion Legion May - th 27 Masada of Fall Matt28 - RISEN MINISTRY Marcus Marcus Aurelius 161 160 WEEK LAST 74 Apr 74 Passover Mar Matt 21 Matt 73 73 20 - Feb 150 66 77/103 90 72 72 MINISTRY Transfiguration Matt17 Pius Pius Jan Destruction Jerusalem of Destruction LATER PEREAN PEREAN LATER 33 71 71 161 Temple destroyed Temple - Dedication Dec Jerusalem occupied by the Roman 10 Roman the by Jerusalemoccupied 140 Titus to Jerusalem of Fall 135 79 - 70 Antoninus 138 70 - Nov GALBA OTHO VITELLIUS Matt16 VESPASIAN 69 MINISTRY 69 69 Oct CIVIL WAR CIVIL Tabernacles JUDEAN LATER AMUEL Second JewishSecond Revolt,132 S 130 68 FIRST FIRST 68 BEN Sept JEWISH REVOLT 87 4/64/67 104 Jude ? Jude Aug 70? 67 67 - HANNIAS 138 P 66 - 120 Peter II July 15 BEN Hadrian 117 - 66 66 I Peter I Florus Jun 66 - Pentecost ATTHIAS (or AD 67) AD (or HEOPHILUS 65 65 Revelation M T 65 Gessius PAUL Matt14 of the of TWELVE 110 Paul & Peter of Martyrdom 46 52 104 May SPECIAL TRAINING SPECIAL . 64 IITim 64 BEN Apr Albinus Albinus July July 19, 64 Passover 64 117 - AMALIEL - Burning of Rome ESUS Titus the Baptist the J G 63 63 63 Trajan 98 Mar Tim. I 100 John of Death I,II,III I,II,III John First First Christian Persecution Lucceius BEN 98 - 62 63 62 Feb - Nerva 96 AMNAEUS ESUS FINAL FINAL TRAVELS Release from Imprisonment from Release J D 62 Acts Phil.