POEM Final Technical Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

POEM Final Technical Report E.02.06-POEM-D6.2-Final Technical Report Document information Project Title POEM Project Number E.02.06 Project Manager University of Westminster Deliverable Name Final Technical Report Deliverable ID 6.2 Edition 01.01.00 Template Version 03.00.00 Task contributors University of Westminster Fundación Instituto de Investigación Innaxis Abstract Central to the POEM (Passenger-Oriented Enhanced Metrics) project is the design of new performance metrics and their evaluation through a European network simulation model under novel flight and passenger prioritisation scenarios. A normative day with full passenger itineraries is simulated. Trade-offs between the (new) flight-centric and passenger-centric metrics are explored. The propagation of delay through the network is characterised using classical and complexity science techniques. The importance of using passenger-centric metrics in fully assessing system performance is repeatedly observed, since key changes are not expressed through any of the currently-used flight metrics. Most prioritisation scenarios perform similarly for high cancellation and high delay days, thus demonstrating robustness in terms of their efficacy under increased disruption. Smaller airports are significantly implicated in the propagation of delay. Back-propagation is also an important characteristic of the persistence of delay in the network. Project E.02.06 Edition 01.01.00 6.2 – Final Technical Report Authoring & Approval Prepared By - Authors of the document. Name & Company Position & Title Date Andrew Cook / University of Westminster Project Leader 05/08/2013 Graham Tanner / University of Westminster Consortium Member Samuel Cristóbal / Innaxis Consortium Member Massimiliano Zanin / Innaxis Researcher Reviewed By - Reviewers internal to the project. Name & Company Position & Title Date Graham Tanner / University of Westminster Consortium Member 08/08/2013 Samuel Cristóbal / Innaxis Consortium Member Reviewed By - Other SESAR projects, Airspace Users, staff association, military, Industrial Support, other organisations. Name & Company Position & Title Date - - - Approved for submission to the SJU By - Representatives of the company involved in the project. Name & Company Position & Title Date Andrew Cook / University of Westminster Project Leader 10/08/2013 Rejected By - Representatives of the company involved in the project. Name & Company Position & Title Date - - - Rational for rejection - Document History Edition Date Status Author Justification New document for review by 01.00.00 10/08/2013 Deliverable Andrew Cook EUROCONTROL References to other POEM 01.01.00 30/09/2013 Final Deliverable Andrew Cook outputs made more explicit Intellectual Property Rights (foreground) Foreground owned by one or several Members or their Affiliates. 2 of 135 ©SESAR JOINT UNDERTAKING, 2013. Created by the University of Westminster and Innaxis for the SESAR Joint Undertaking within the frame of the SESAR Programme co-financed by the EU and EUROCONTROL. Reprint with approval of publisher and the source properly acknowledged. Project E.02.06 Edition 01.01.00 6.2 – Final Technical Report Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................. 9 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 10 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT .............................................................................................................. 10 1.2 INTENDED READERSHIP ........................................................................................................................ 10 1.3 EUROPEAN UNION POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................... 11 1.4 INPUTS FROM OTHER PROJECTS .......................................................................................................... 11 2 SUMMARY AND UPDATE OF POEM ................................................................................................... 12 2.1 OVERVIEW AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................ 12 2.2 SUMMARY OF THE METRICS .................................................................................................................. 13 2.3 SUMMARY OF THE PRIORITISATION SCENARIOS ................................................................................... 14 2.4 SUMMARY AND UPDATE OF THE MODEL ............................................................................................... 16 2.4.1 Core model .................................................................................................................................. 16 2.4.2 Traffic inputs for three simulation days ................................................................................... 21 2.4.3 Assigning passengers to flights ............................................................................................... 30 2.5 MODEL CALIBRATION ............................................................................................................................ 37 3 RESULTS OF THE MODEL .................................................................................................................... 39 3.1 THE CHALLENGES OF ESTABLISHING CAUSALITY ................................................................................. 39 3.2 CLASSICAL RESULTS............................................................................................................................. 43 3.3 FACTOR ANALYSIS (DERIVED METRICS) ............................................................................................... 54 3.3.1 Review and update of the factor analytical approach ........................................................... 54 3.3.2 Applying factor analysis to the model data ............................................................................. 56 3.4 NETWORK AND COMPLEXITY ANALYSES ............................................................................................... 64 3.4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 64 3.4.2 Reactionary delay and the propagation of delay ................................................................... 66 3.4.3 Granger causality analyses ...................................................................................................... 73 3.5 COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE ANALYTICAL METHODS ................................................................ 81 4 BEYOND POEM – A LOOK AHEAD ..................................................................................................... 83 4.1 DISSEMINATION .................................................................................................................................... 83 4.2 FURTHER RESEARCH ............................................................................................................................ 83 5 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 84 APPENDIX A KEY MODEL RULES AND VARIABLES ...................................................................... 87 APPENDIX B FINAL DATA PREPARATION AND CLEANING ....................................................... 115 APPENDIX C FACTOR ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ...................................................................... 120 APPENDIX D PASSENGER VALUE OF TIME.................................................................................... 129 APPENDIX E BASELINE TRAFFIC DAY DISRUPTION ................................................................... 132 APPENDIX F FURTHER ANALYSES OF AIRPORT REACTIONARY DELAY ............................ 133 3 of 135 ©SESAR JOINT UNDERTAKING, 2013. Created by the University of Westminster and Innaxis for the SESAR Joint Undertaking within the frame of the SESAR Programme co-financed by the EU and EUROCONTROL. Reprint with approval of publisher and the source properly acknowledged. Project E.02.06 Edition 01.01.00 6.2 – Final Technical Report List of tables Table 1. Summary of prioritisation scenarios ........................................................................................ 15 Table 2. Rules and scenarios................................................................................................................ 15 Table 3. Cancellation event types ......................................................................................................... 22 Table 4. Article 5 (cancellation), Regulation 261 .................................................................................. 23 Table 5. Daily cancellation rates for 2012 (full year c.f. September; 2 s.f.) .......................................... 25 Table 6. Example allocation of additional cancellations ....................................................................... 29 Table 7. Identified passenger allocation issues .................................................................................... 31 Table 8. SEP10 passenger breakdown by flight leg and allocation proportion targets .......................
Recommended publications
  • Appendices Appendix 1
    APPENDICES APPENDIX 1. SOURCES AND METHODS FOR THE SETTLEMENT MAP The median figures represented on the map refer to total agricultural population. The discrimination of agricultural and non-agricultural population is available in the local detail of the census materials only from Hungary and Eastern Germany. In all other countries, the medians for total rural population have been reduced proportionately to the ratio between rural and agricultural population. This procedure risks to some extent to over-estimate the size of agricultural villages, but this is largely compensated by the fact that agglomera­ tions of an urban character, where the majority of the population belongs to non-agricultural occupations, are not included in the area for which the com­ putation is made. The "agrotowns" in some Southern areas are on the other hand included among the agricultural settlement. The results thus obtained are, of course, reliable mainly in their broad features, and details should be read with caution. For the calculations here presented, administrative subdivisions have been followed. For reasons obvious in connection with a survey like this one, the administrative units are generally on the provincial level, and sometimes even larger subdivisions have had to be accepted as basis. It has not been possible to make the distribution to correspond with homogeneous geographical regions. Contrasts occurring at short distances are therefore largely hidden. In many instances it might have been desirable to calculate more fractiles, e.g. quartiles. In regions where the settlement consists of a combination of large rural centers and scattered farms, the median values may represent a size of village which is of rare occurrence.
    [Show full text]
  • Undergraduate Catalogue 2015-2016
    Undergraduate Catalogue 2015-2016 Seton Hall University Publication Number CLVIII Volume I. Produced by the Seton Hall University Office of the Provost in conjunction with the Department of Public Relations and Marketing. The information presented in this catalogue is current as of July 2015. While this catalogue was prepared on the basis of updated and current information available at the time, the University reserves the right to make changes, as certain circumstances require. For more information, visit our web site at www.shu.edu All of Seton Hall’s programs and policies are consistent with the University’s mission and are carried out in accordance with the teachings of the Catholic Church and the proscriptions of the law. The University supports and implements all state and federal anti- discrimination laws, including Executive Order 11246, as amended, which prohibits discrimination in employment by institutions with federal contracts; Titles VI and VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibit discrimination against students and all employees on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin or sex; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibits discrimination against students and all employees on the basis of sex; Sections 503 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which require affirmative action to employ and advance in employment qualified disabled veterans of the Vietnam Era; the Equal Pay Act of 1963, which prohibits discrimination in salaries; the Age Discrimination in Employment Acts of 1967 and 1975, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of age and; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Traffic Management Abbreviation Compendium
    Air Traffic Management Abbreviation Compendium List of Aviation, Aerospace and Aeronautical Acronyms DLR-IB-FL-BS-2021-1 Institute of Air Traffic Management Abbreviation Compendium Flight Guidance Document properties Title Air Traffic Management Abbreviation Compendium Subject List of Aviation, Aerospace and Aeronautical Acronyms Institute Institute of Flight Guidance, Braunschweig, German Aerospace Center, Germany Authors Nikolai Rieck, Marco-Michael Temme IB-Number DLR-IB-FL-BS-2021-1 Date 2021-01-28 Version 1.0 Title: Air Traffic Management Abbreviation Compendium Date: 2021-01-28 Page: 2 Version: 1.0 Authors: N. Rieck & M.-M. Temme Institute of Air Traffic Management Abbreviation Compendium Flight Guidance Index of contents 2.1. Numbers and Punctuation Marks _______________________________________________________ 6 2.2. Letter - A ___________________________________________________________________________ 7 2.3. Letter - B ___________________________________________________________________________ 55 2.4. Letter - C __________________________________________________________________________ 64 2.5. Letter - D _________________________________________________________________________ 102 2.6. Letter - E __________________________________________________________________________ 128 2.7. Letter - F __________________________________________________________________________ 152 2.8. Letter - G _________________________________________________________________________ 170 2.9. Letter - H _________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Formal and Legal Basis for Combating Terrorism
    http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/8142-184-3.22 Michał Stępiński 1. FORMAL AND LEGAL BASIS FOR COMBATING TERRORISM The threat of the use of CBRN-E in terrorist attacks means that law enforcement agencies must always be prepared to respond to such threats. This is just one part of the fight against terrorism. Efficiency in under such conditions requires interdisciplinary knowledge of: – The formal and legal basis for combating terrorism; – Decision-making under emergency conditions (e.g. in terrorist attacks); – Terrorism as a threat to public order; – Anti-terrorist actions involving CBRN materials. Knowledge of these areas will help incident responders to identify the threats posed by terrorism to public safety, to understand the functioning of the various anti-terrorist systems, and to prepare them for decision-making in response to terrorist incidents – particularly CBRN-E. Ensuring public security is one of the basic functions of the modern state. Terrorism is one of the greatest threats to the world and forces us to take action in the fight against it, to prevent and react to attacks. Like any state activity, the fight against terrorism must be based on legally binding acts and organisational arrangements. These must be influenced by both the domestic and international environments. Escalation of the potential for terrorist threats makes it necessary to continually improve anti-terrorism systems. Understanding the formal and legal bases for combating terrorism, and knowing what the legal and public security procedures are at the site of a terrorist attack, are all necessary preparations in the fight against terrorism. Security specialists should: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • July 11, 1958 Catholic Church
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall The aC tholic Advocate Archives and Special Collections 7-11-1958 The Advocate - July 11, 1958 Catholic Church Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/catholic-advocate Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, and the Missions and World Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Catholic Church, "The Advocate - July 11, 1958" (1958). The Catholic Advocate. 28. https://scholarship.shu.edu/catholic-advocate/28 Five Others The Advocate Planned More ‘Consecrations’ Reported From China Publication of the Archdiocese of Newark, N. J. •«b,<r lPt Pr„. "yjßffijfyi*Official ,on ; „ Y..rly and of the Diocese of N. HONG ’ ; Paterson, J. « KONG—Both Catholic and communist sources m »«».&!(* j r«t» »» Wltm »rovld.d for In »«ctl«n IIM. Act f Ort. :»♦ s, my. .uthorlfd Nov. ». | W ’ e re , P our more “bishops” have been “consecrat- VOL. 7, NO. 28 j>> Chinese Reds Jail FRIDAY, JULY 11, 1958 e in communist China. In PRICE: TEN CENTS addition, there are reports that five others will be to “elevated” the episcopacy soon. Two More Priests The latest follow a reports by week the announcement ROME (NC) Two Chinese of four Cardinal Ill other “consecrations.” of the Burke priests Hengyang (Hunan) Msgr. , Additional details Bloomfield on that devel- diocese have been imprisoned Xavier of Sienhsien by opment, Chao, S.J., including the names of the Chinese In in the cathedral communists, accord- those “consecrated” officiating there. and the offi- Yugoslavia ing to a report by Fides, Pastor ciating According to the communist mission Dies at 70 ZAGREB, Bishop, have become news agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurocontrol Airial
    w AIRIAL w EUROCONTROL Air Navigation Inter-site Acronym List w w w AIRIAL lists abbreviations and acronyms used in EUROCONTROL documents and publications. This PDF version is generated automatically from the AIRIAL online database (hyperlink) as regularly updated. w User input is an important part of the AIRIAL system. Should you have any feedback (new acronyms for inclusion in the list or proposals for corrections or amendments), please use the 'Add New' function available on the AIRIAL webpage, or contact us at [email protected] w w The AIRIAL Editorial Board blanc Denis Deramaut (Central Flow Management Unit) Robin Deransy (EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre) Angela Friesen (Directorate Resources) Michel Nicolay (Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre) Rik Simoens (EUROCONTROL Institute of Air Navigation Services) Lut Stessens (Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre) Mark Whitely (Corporate Network Design) blanc Stephen Fairhurst (AIRIAL Project Manager) w w w w Browsing of the material available on the EUROCONTROL site (including the copying of such material in RAM or other temporary forms of storage necessary to facilitate such browsing) is authorised. ReproductionEUROCONTROL is authorised for personal use only provided AIRIAL the source is duly acknowledged.All other uses are prohibited. w Information on air navigation and air traffic control does not engage the responsibility of the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation. While our goal is to keep this information timely and accurate, we cannot guarantee either.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Reports on Terrorism 2019
    Country Reports on Terrorism 2019 BUREAU OF COUNTERTERRORISM Country Reports on Terrorism 2019 is submitted in compliance with Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 2656f (the “Act”), which requires the Department of State to provide to Congress a full and complete annual report on terrorism for those countries and groups meeting the criteria of the Act. Table of Contents Foreword Glossary For More Information Chapter 1-Country Reports on Terrorism Africa East Asia and the Pacific Europe The Middle East and North Africa South and Central Asia Western Hemisphere Chapter 2-State Sponsors of Terrorism Chapter 3-The Global Challenge of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, or Nuclear Terrorism Chapter 4-Terrorist Safe Havens (Update to 7120 Report) Chapter 5-Foreign Terrorist Organizations Chapter 6-Legislative Requirements and Key Terms Appendix B-Terrorism Deaths, Injuries, and Kidnappings of U.S. Citizens 1 2019 Country Reports on Terrorism Foreword In 2019, the United States and our partners made major strides to defeat and degrade international terrorist organizations. Along with the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS, in March, the United States completed the destruction of the so-called “caliphate” in Iraq and Syria. In October, the United States launched a military operation that resulted in the death of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the self-proclaimed “caliph” of ISIS. As part of the maximum pressure campaign against the Iranian regime – the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism – the United States and our partners imposed new sanctions on Tehran and its proxies. In April, the United States designated Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), including its Qods Force, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) – the first time such a designation has been applied to part of another government.
    [Show full text]
  • Scarcity and Surfeit the Ecology of Africa's Conflicts
    Scarcity and Surfeit The ecology of Africa's conflicts EDITED BY Jeremy Lind and Kathryn Sturman African Centre for Technology Studies and Institute for Security Studies Funded by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Governments of Sweden and Switzerland Published by the lnstitute for Security Studies, South Africa, 2002 Block C, 301 Brooklyn Court, Bronkhorst Street, New Muckleneuk, Pretoria First published in 2002 by the Institute for Security Studies All rights reserved by the publisher. Cover photographs: Upper front cover picture copyright: FotoStock SA. Lower front cover picture copyright: SA History Online Maps: Department of Public Information, Cartographic Section, United Nations Cover design: A1 Graphics/Andre Snyders Language editing: Denise Fourie and Kathryn Sturman Copyright in this volume and its individual chapters is vested in the Institute for Security Studies and the African Centre for Technology Studies. No chapter may be reproduced in whole or in part without the express permission, in writing, of the publisher. it should be noted that any opinions expressed are the responsibility of the individual authors and not the ISS nor ACTS. The publisher cannot be held legally accountable for facts and opinions expressed in this volume. ISBN: 1-919913-18-1 Preface vi Disclaimer viii Contributors ix 1. Contemporary Conflict Analysis in Perspective 1 1060 Gomes Porto Introduction Developing Theories of Conflict Analysis 'Greed versus Grievance': Tautological Debate or Two Sides of the Same Coin? The Multi-Level Nature and Dynamic Life Cycles of Armed Conflicts: Towards an Analytical Framework Ecological Sources of Conflict 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Urges Congress Put Defenses of Nation in Better
    I > ' ■ • ■' ij- - - VOMpAT, MABOH1, IMI * • I I iriidj iOanrlfrBtrr ‘Enating ifrraUii A v «n i« Dnflg Clrmlatlsii hr the w u m eC The committee In charge of The Americkn Legion Auxiliary quarters. The 81JM0 coatrlbutad ao ticketa for the dinner-dance of win meet thU evening in the Le­ Wins Scholarship Red Cross O ff far la from corporation gifts nndar About Town Frank J. Manafleld Marine Ctorpa gion home. Coupon chairman Mra. the chairmanship o f Henry It. 9 ,496 t ' -------- Laague and Auxiliary, in celebra­ Dorothy NeUl aaka the membere Mallory and from garages and Myatle lUvtew, W oaa«i’a Ben«> tion of the fourth annlveraary, to bring in their coupona on varl- To Good Start aenice stations under the chair­ flt AMocUttoo, wlU mMt toioor> will meat tomorrow evening at oua products. Each coupon win manship o f Robert Bchaller, ■Neul'^ Spring Manehetter^A CUy o f VOiogo Charm row In Odd FeOowa hall. the home o f Mra. Lee Darling, enUtle them to a ticket on a Tou are reminded that U you live In Manchester jrou should give In All ipiard* are aaked to be prea* Church atreet. The affair la ached, drawing. The coupons ere turned First Ten Yards on the (TWELVE PAGES) PRICE POUR' ent aa rrhearaala will begin for tiled for Saturday evening at the In to the national organisation Manchester because it is through yO L. L X m , NO. ea rate if) MANCHESTER, CONN, TUESDAY, MARCH 2,1948 the Boor work at the convention Garden Grove, and all ticket re- from ell over the country and Grid Campaign Attain* thal Chapter that your needs will 129 in New London, Saturday, May tuma ahould be made at once.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Network Operations Report 2016
    ANNUAL NETWORK OPERATIONS REPORT 2016 ANNEX I - USERS VIEW 1 Airspace Users’ Key Points on Network Performance Summary of Airspace Users’ views presented at the 89th meeting of the Route Network Development Sub-Group (RNDSG) held at EUROCONTROL Headquarters between 27 September and 29 September 2016. Agenda Item 5.1.1: The Users’ View of the Summer Season 2016 (Presented by the International Air Transport Association – IATA) 1.1 Airline Bottom Line By tradition, the airline industry is characterized by capital intensity in combination with relatively low average profit margins of just a few percentages. With fuel representing an important part of airline total costs (alongside overflight charges, labor, maintenance, etc.), operational efficiency including route efficiency is key to successful business performance. Airlines need to operate their declared gate-to-gate flight schedule in the most cost effective and optimized manner, based on their individual trajectory business requirements, enabled by transparency and auditability of imposed constraints, in all phases of flight. 1.2 Network Performance So far in 2016, traffic is up around 2.3% compared to 2015, with average daily traffic levels now similar to the record year 2008. An all-time high was recorded on September 9 with 34594 flights. Year-to-date network enroute ATFM delay per flight is up compared to last year (around 1 min versus 0.76 min), and year- to-date network airport ATFM delay per flight remains at the 2015 level (around 0.66 min). ATC industrial action and weather, both considered to be uncontrollable from a network management perspective, are having a significant negative impact on network delay performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Submission by the European Roma Rights Centre Concerning Bulgaria
    WRITTEN SUBMISSION BY THE EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE CONCERNING BULGARIA To the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, for consideration at its 92nd Session (24 April - 12 May 2017) CHALLENGING DISCRIMINATION PROMOTING EQUALITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Hate Speech and Hate Crimes Against Roma and Crimes and the Deficiencies of the Bulgarian Justice System 3 Hate Speech Against Romani People 7 Hate Crimes Against Romani People 7 Violence and Hate Speech Against Roma 8 Forced Evictions and Discrimination Against Roma in Housing 10 Access to Education 10 Discrimination of Roma in Access to Health Care 11 Segregated Maternity Wards 11 Unequal Access to Healthcare 12 Recommendations 13 2 INTRODUCTION The European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) is a Roma-led international public interest law organisation which monitors the human rights of Roma in Europe and provides legal defence in cases of human rights violations.1 The ERRC is deeply concerned at the lack of progress made by Bulgarian authorities since CERD issued its concluding observations on Bulgaria in 2009 with specific reference to the committee’s recommendations concerning the situation of Roma and other minorities. Bulgarian authorities continue to target Romani com- munities for forced evictions, and the de facto segregation of Roma continues in all areas of life, in particular in the spheres of residential segregation and segregation in healthcare facilities. Limited progress has been made with regards to enforcing legislation persecuting racially motivated hate crimes. Hate speech continues to affect Romani minorities in particular, leading to a number of instances of violence. In a number of cases, Bulgarian authorities have failed to protect Romani citizens from violent racist mobs attacking Romani communities and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Report Sports Activities and Amusement and Recreation Activities 2016 BULGARIA
    Industry Report Sports activities and amusement and recreation activities 2016 BULGARIA seenews.com/reports This industry report is part of your subcription access to SeeNews | seenews.com/subscription CONTENTS I. KEY INDICATORS II. INTRODUCTION III. REVENUES IV. EXPENSES V. PROFITABILITY VI. EMPLOYMENT 1 SeeNews Industry Report In 2015 there were a total of 3,064 companies operating in the industry. In 2014 their number totalled 2,851. I. KEY INDICATORS NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN SPORTS ACTIVITIES AND The Sports activities and amusement and recreation AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION ACTIVITIES INDUSTRY BY activities industry in Bulgaria was represented by 3,377 SECTORS companies at the end of 2016, compared to 3,064 in the SECTOR 2016 2015 2014 previous year and 2,851 in 2014. OTHER AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION 2,000 1,815 1,692 ACTIVITIES The industry's net profit amounted to BGN 18,409,000 in FITNESS FACILITIES 513 452 427 2016. OTHER SPORTS ACTIVITIES 423 371 323 ACTIVITIES OF AMUSEMENT PARKS AND 190 182 178 The industry's total revenue was BGN 487,724,000 in 2016, THEME PARKS up by 5.19% compared to the previous year. OPERATION OF SPORTS FACILITIES 172 166 157 ACTIVITIES OF SPORT CLUBS 79 78 74 The combined costs of the companies in the Sports activities and amusement and recreation activities industry reached BGN 465,208,000 in 2016, up by 9.97% year-on- year. III. REVENUES The industry's total revenue makes up 0.53% to the country's Gross domestic product (GDP) in 2016, compared The total revenue in the industry was BGN 487,724,000 in to 0.52% for 2015 and 0.45% in 2014.
    [Show full text]