DOCSLIB.ORG

A Study in Authenticity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Study in Authenticity A Study in Authenticity Admissible Concealed Indicators of Authority and Other Features of Forgeries—A Case Study on Clement of Alexandria, Letter to Theodore, and the Longer Gospel of Mark Timo S. Paananen DOCTORAL DISSERTATION to be presented for public discussion with the permission of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Helsinki, in Auditorium XIV, University Main Building, on the 29th of May, 2019 at 12 o’clock. Helsinki 2019 - -* * 4' ( ) *5 4' ( ) *5 .* 46 * ' (5 -* 7 4 * ' (5 .* 46 * ' (5 .$ 978-951-51-5250-3 4%% *5 .$ 978-951-51-5251-0 4 5 ' ) * /120 Abstract A standard approach in historically minded disciplines to documents and other artefacts that have become suspect is to concentrate on their dissimilarities with known genuine artefacts. While such an approach works reasonably well with relatively poor forgeries, more skilfully done counterfeits have tended to divide expert opinions, demanding protracted scholarly attention. As there has not been a widespread scholarly consensus on a constrained set of criteria for detecting forgeries, a pragmatic maximum for such dissimilarities—as there are potentially an infinite numbers of differences that can be enumerated between any two artefacts—has been impossible to set. Thus, rather than relying on a philosophically robust critical framework, scholars have been accustomed to approaching the matter on a largely case-by-case basis, with a handful of loosely formulated rules for guidance. In response to these shortcomings, this dissertation argues that a key characteristic of inquiry in historically minded disciplines should be the ability to distinguish between knowledge-claims that are epistemically warranted—i.e., that can be asserted post hoc from the material reality they have become embedded in with reference to some sort of rigorous methodological framework—and knowledge-claims that are not. An ancient letter by Clement of Alexandria (ca. 150–215 CE) to Theodore, in which two passages from the Longer Gospel of Mark (also known as the Secret Gospel of Mark) are quoted, has long been suspected of having been forged by Morton Smith (1915–1991), its putative discoverer. The bulk of this dissertation consists of four different articles that each use different methodological approaches. The first, a discourse analysis on scholarly debate over the letter’s authenticity, illuminates the reasons behind its odd character and troubled history. Second, archival research unearths how data points have become corrupted through unintended additions in digital-image processing (a phenomenon labelled line screen distortion here). Third, a quantitative study of the handwriting in Clement’s Letter to Theodore shows the inadequacy of unwittingly applying palaeographic standards in cases of suspected deceptions compared to the standards adhered to in forensic studies. Additionally, Smith’s conduct as an academic manuscript hunter is found to have been consistent with the standard practices of that profession. Finally, a study of the conceptual distinctions and framing of historical explanations in contemporary forgery discourse reveals the power of the methodologic approach of WWFD (What Would a Forger Do?), which has recently been used in three varieties (unconcealed, concealed, and hyperactive) to construe suspected documents as potential forgeries—despite its disregard of justificatory grounding in favour of coming up with free-form, first-person narratives in which the conceivable functions as its own justification. Together, the four articles illustrate the pitfalls of scholarly discourse on forgeries, especially that surrounding Clement’s Letter to Theodore. The solution to the poor argumentation that has characterized the scholarly study of forgeries is suggested to be an exercise in demarcation: to decide (in the abstract) which features should be acceptable as evidence either for or against the ascription of the status of forgery to an historical artefact. Implied within this suggestion is the notion of constraint, i.e., such that a constrained criterion would be one that cannot be employed to back up both an argument and its counter-argument. A topical case study—a first step on the road to creating a rigorous standard for constrained criteria in determining counterfeits—is the alternative narrative of an imagined creation of Clement’s Letter to Theodore by Smith around the time of its reported discovery (1958). Concealed indicators of authority, or the deliberate concealment of authorial details within the forged artefact by the forger, is established as a staple of the literary strategy of mystification, and their post hoc construction as acceptable evidence of authorship is argued to follow according to criteria: 1) that the beginning of the act of decipherment of a concealed indicator of authority has to have been preceded by a literary primer that is unambiguous to a high degree, 2) that, following the prompting of the literary primer, the act of deciphering a concealed indicator of authority has to have adhered to a technique or method that is unambiguous to a high degree, and 3) that, following the prompting of the literary primer and the act of decipherment, both of which must have been practiced in an unambiguous manner to a high degree, the plain-text solution to the concealed indicator of authority must likewise be unambiguous to a high degree. Acknowledgements Much of the research of this dissertation was made possible by the three years of full- time funding provided by the Finnish Cultural Foundation and, in part, by the University of Helsinki. I wish to acknowledge the contributions of my supervisors, Docent Matti Myllykoski and Professor Ismo Dunderberg. I am especially grateful to Roger Viklund, with whom I co- authored two of the four research articles in this dissertation. Dr. Scott G. Brown and Professor Allan J. Pantuck also played key roles, freely offering their comments and criticisms along the journey. I am also indebted to the external reviewers of this dissertation, Professors Tony Burke and Mark Goodacre. Various other scholars have also left their mark on this doctoral work: Professors Michel Desjardins, James F. McGrath, Pierluigi Piovanelli, Bart D. Ehrman, as well as the members of the University of Waterloo/Wilfrid Laurier University Biblical Colloquium. I wish furthermore to acknowledge the gracious peer feedback given by my graduate student colleagues in our research seminar (New Testament Studies) at the University of Helsinki. The idiosyncrasies of the English of this dissertation were professionally corrected by Kenneth W. Lai. All remaining mistakes and quirky syntactic structures are due to my own linguistic preferences and consciously made contrary to his better judgment. Finally, I acknowledge my indebtedness to Dr. Maiju Paananen—my wife, my lover, and my friend. Table of Contents 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................9 1.1 The Manuscript of Clement’s Letter to Theodore...............................................................18 1.2 The Alternative Narrative: The Manuscript of Clement’s Letter to Theodore as a Fake21 1.3 Some Preliminary (and Pre-emptive) Considerations..................................................29 2 Methods and Materials.............................................................................................................32 2.1 “Stalemate to Deadlock”: A Discourse Analysis by Any Other Name..........................32 2.2. “Distortion of the Scribal Hand”: A Rankean Trip to the Archive..............................33 2.3. “Control of the Scribal Hand”: Palaeography and Forensic Studies in the Qualitative and Quantitative Abstract..................................................................................34 2.4 “WWFD”: An Analytic Study of Method..........................................................................35 2.5 Methods for Studying the Alternative Narrative...........................................................35 2.5.1 Classifying the Arguments within the Alternative Narrative..............................36 2.5.1.1 The Literary, Derivative Relationship (hoax).................................................37 2.5.1.2 Concealed Indicators of Authority and Jokes.................................................42 2.5.2 Studying the Arguments within the Alternative Narrative..................................47 2.5.3 Contrasting the Arguments within the Alternative Narrative.............................60 2.5.3.1 Contrasting Literary, Derivative Relationships (Hoax).................................60 2.5.3.2 Contrasting Concealed Authorial Indicators and Jokes................................65 2.5.3.3 Summary and Further Discussion....................................................................80 3 Results and Discussion..............................................................................................................84 3.1 Suggested Criteria for the Control of Concealed Indicators of Authority and Deliberate Actions of the Author...........................................................................................90 3.1.1 Concealment of indicators of authority..................................................................94 3.1.1.1 Primer Solutions (1): Inattentional Blindness................................................95 3.1.1.2 Primer Solutions (2): Cryptanalytic Hyperactivity........................................96
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Forgers and Fiction: How Forgery Developed the Novel, 1846-79
    Forgers and Fiction: How Forgery Developed the Novel, 1846-79 Paul Ellis University College London Doctor of Philosophy UMI Number: U602586 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U602586 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 Abstract This thesis argues that real-life forgery cases significantly shaped the form of Victorian fiction. Forgeries of bills of exchange, wills, parish registers or other documents were depicted in at least one hundred novels between 1846 and 1879. Many of these portrayals were inspired by celebrated real-life forgery cases. Forgeries are fictions, and Victorian fiction’s representations of forgery were often self- reflexive. Chapter one establishes the historical, legal and literary contexts for forgery in the Victorian period. Chapter two demonstrates how real-life forgers prompted Victorian fiction to explore its ambivalences about various conceptions of realist representation. Chapter three shows how real-life forgers enabled Victorian fiction to develop the genre of sensationalism. Chapter four investigates how real-life forgers influenced fiction’s questioning of its epistemological status in Victorian culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Fiction and Literary Forgery in Eighteenth-Century Britain
    English Faculty Publications English 2008 Forging Literary History: Historical Fiction and Literary Forgery in Eighteenth-Century Britain Anne H. Stevens University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/english_fac_articles Part of the European History Commons, Intellectual History Commons, and the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Repository Citation Stevens, A. H. (2008). Forging Literary History: Historical Fiction and Literary Forgery in Eighteenth- Century Britain. Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 37 217-232. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/english_fac_articles/20 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Article in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Article has been accepted for inclusion in English Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Porging Literary History: Historica{ Piction ant£ Literary Porgery in lEieliteentli-Century CBritain ANNE H. STEVENS n his article "History's Greatest Forger: Science, Fiction, and Fraud I Along the Seine," historian of science Ken Alder purports to have discovered a letter in a French archive by Denis Vrain-Lucas, a notorious nineteenth-century forger who made a fortune selling letters he claimed to have discovered in a hitherto-unknown casque ofpapers by such luminaries as Galileo, Alexander the Great, and Mary Magdalene (all written in French!).
    [Show full text]
  • Scholar Adventurers Also by Richard D
    ichard THE SCHOLAR ADVENTURERS ALSO BY RICHARD D. ALTICK Preface to Critical Reading The Cowden Clarkes The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public, 1800-1900 The Art of Literary Research Lives and Letters: A History of Literary Biography in England and America Browning's Roman Murder Story: A Reading of The Ring and the Book (with James F. Loucks II) To Be in England Victorian Studies in Scarlet Victorian People and Ideas The Shows of London Paintings from Books: Art and Literature in Britain, 1760-1900 Deadly Encounters: Two Victorian Sensations EDITIONS Thomas Carlyle: Past and Present Robert Browning: The Ring and the Book THE Scholar Adventurers RICHARD D. ALTICK Ohio State University Press, Columbus Copyright ©1950, 1987 by Richard D. Altick. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publicatlon Data Altick, Richard Daniel, 1915- The scholar adventurers. Reprint. Originally published: New York : Macmillan, 1950. With new pref. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. English literature—Research. 2. Learning and scholarship—History. 3. Great Britain—Intellectual life. I. Title. P56.A7 1987 820'.72'0922 87-11064 ISBN O-8142-O435-X CONTENTS Preface to the Ohio State University Press Edition vii Introduction: The Unsung Scholar 1 I. The Secret of the Ebony Cabinet 16 II. The Case of the Curious Bibliographers 37 III. The Quest of the Knight-Prisoner 65 IV. Hunting for Manuscripts 86 V. Exit a Lady, Enter Another 122 VI. A Gallery of Inventors 142 VII. The Scholar and the Scientist 176 VIII. Secrets in Cipher 200 IX. The Destructive Elements 211 X.
    [Show full text]
  • Faking, Forging, Counterfeiting
    Daniel Becker, Annalisa Fischer, Yola Schmitz (eds.) Faking, Forging, Counterfeiting Daniel Becker, Annalisa Fischer, Yola Schmitz (eds.) in collaboration with Simone Niehoff and Florencia Sannders Faking, Forging, Counterfeiting Discredited Practices at the Margins of Mimesis Funded by the Elite Network of Bavaria as part of the International Doctoral Program MIMESIS. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. The Open Access ISBN for this book is 978-3-8394-3762-9. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommer- cial-NoDerivs 4.0 (BY-NC-ND) which means that the text may be used for non- commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. To create an adaptation, translation, or derivative of the original work and for commercial use, further permission is required and can be obtained by contac- ting [email protected] © 2018 transcript Verlag, Bielefeld Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Na- tionalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de Cover concept: Maria Arndt, Bielefeld
    [Show full text]
  • Britishness and Problems of Authenticity in Post-Union Literature from Addison to Macpherson
    "Where are the originals?" Britishness and problems of authenticity in post-Union literature from Addison to Macpherson. Melvin Eugene Kersey III Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. University of Leeds, School of English September 2001 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his/her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the generous help, encouragement and support of many people. My research has benefited beyond reckoning from the supervision of Professor David Fairer, whose inspired scholarship has never interfered with his commitment to my research. It is difficult to know whether to thank or to curse Professor Andrew Wawn for introducing me to James Macpherson's Ossianic poetry during my MA at Leeds, but at any rate I am now doubly indebted to him for his insightful reading of a chapter of this thesis. I am also grateful to Professor Paul Hammond for his enormously helpful comments and suggestions on another chapter. And despite the necessary professional distance which an internal examiner must maintain, I have still enjoyed the benevolent proximity effect of Professor Edward Larrissy. I am grateful to Sue Baker and the administrative staff of the School of English for providing me with employment and moral support during this thesis, especially Pamela Rhodes. Special thanks to the inestimable help, friendship and rigorous mind of Dr. Michael Brown, and to Professor Terence and Sue Brown for their repeated generous hospitality in Dublin.
    [Show full text]
  • Crafting Critical Feminist Narrative Pedagogies Through Women’S and Queer Life Writing
    ABSTRACT TEACHING A TRANSFORMATIVE STORY: CRAFTING CRITICAL FEMINIST NARRATIVE PEDAGOGIES THROUGH WOMEN’S AND QUEER LIFE WRITING Rhiannon Catherwood, PhD Department of English Northern Illinois University, 2017 Diana L. Swanson, Director This dissertation bridges narrative psychology, pedagogical theory, and the study of marginalized life writing. Narrative psychologists argue that human beings instinctively process their experiences in terms of story, including educational experiences. Literary critics focusing on life writing argue that authors of differing backgrounds produce distinctly different genres of life narrative, evidencing different patterns of thought and reasoning. The principal concern of teaching professionals should be to create an inclusive atmosphere which maximizes the learning potential of a diverse body of students. This means developing educational practices which reflect the diverse ways in which students perceive and relate to the world around them. This dissertation incorporates queer and feminist literary theory and criticism, textual analysis of a variety of autobiographies, memoirs, and personal essays, research on the application of narrative theory to pedagogy, and critical feminist pedagogy. Building on existing research on narrative pedagogy with analysis of the distinct qualities of women’s autobiography and queer autobiography, this project suggests changes to both classroom practices and curriculum development. By changing the genre of our educational narratives, we can transform the atmosphere of campuses and classrooms into one in which previously marginalized students are centralized and empowered. NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY DE KALB, ILLINOIS MAY 2017 TEACHING A TRANSFORMATIVE STORY: CRAFTING CRITICAL FEMINIST NARRATIVE PEDAGOGIES THROUGH WOMEN’S AND QUEER LIFE WRITING BY RHIANNON CATHERWOOD © 2016 Rhiannon Catherwood A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH Doctoral Director: Diana L.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalist and Hoaxer: William Francis Mannix and the Long History Of
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2017 Journalist and Hoaxer: William Francis Mannix and the Long History of Faked News Madelyn Kay Duhon Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Mass Communication Commons Recommended Citation Duhon, Madelyn Kay, "Journalist and Hoaxer: William Francis Mannix and the Long History of Faked News" (2017). LSU Master's Theses. 4415. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4415 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JOURNALIST AND HOAXER: WILLIAM FRANCIS MANNIX AND THE LONG HISTORY OF FAKED NEWS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Mass Communication in The Manship School of Mass Communication by Madelyn K. Duhon B.A., Louisiana State University, 2015 May 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Jack Hamilton, for time and effort he invested into this project. It would not have been possible without his patience, insight, and expertise, all of which was appreciated every step of this writing process. Your demanding standards helped me produce my best work. I would like to thank the members of my committee, Len Apcar and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Love and Madness: a Forgery Too True
    Lévy (2006). Love and Madness: A Forgery Too True. Plagiary: Cross‐Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsi‐ fication, 88‐99. Love and Madness: A Forgery Too True Ellen Lévy E‐mail: levy@univ‐tlse2.fr Abstract another cause célèbre. Croft’s self-reflexive text This article moves from an account of the crime of seems to use the Chatterton material to announce the Reverend James Hackman, who in 1779 mur- its own status, while playfully punishing itself with the dered Martha Ray, the mistress of Lord Sandwich, hanging of Dodd. In an age that saw the flowering and was subsequently executed for his deed, to the of the literary professional, Croft was one of many publishing history of the volumes to which his crime hack writers working the ground of the profitable gave rise. It then looks in more specific detail at one spin-off from a sensational public event. Although of these volumes, Love and Madness: A Story Too his novel delves sensitively into the psychological True (1780), which purported to be the authentic make-up of a young man fascinated with violence correspondence of the murderer and his victim but and death, it also displays a professional’s flair for which was actually an epistolary novel written by an what will sell. The reactions to his text indicate that exact contemporary of the young assassin. Love by the latter part of the century, artistic merit was and Madness was from the start a "bestseller" but, establishing itself as a criterion of evaluation that also from the start, its ambiguous nature was recog- could be separated from factuality.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF the Poet and the Murderer: a True Story of Literary Crime and the Art of Forgery
    PDF The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery Simon Worrall - free pdf download The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery PDF Download, Download The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery PDF, The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery Download PDF, Read The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery Full Collection Simon Worrall, Read Best Book Online The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery, Free Download The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery Full Version Simon Worrall, The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery Free Read Online, PDF The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery Full Collection, online pdf The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery, pdf free download The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery, book pdf The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery, by Simon Worrall pdf The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery, Download Online The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery Book, Download The Poet And The Murderer: A True Story Of Literary Crime And The Art Of Forgery Online Free, Read Online The Poet
    [Show full text]
  • John Payne Collier
    JOHN PAYNE COLLIER “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project John Payne Collier HDT WHAT? INDEX JOHN PAYNE COLLIER JOHN PAYNE COLLIER 1789 January 11, Sunday: John Payne Collier was born in London. His journalist father John Dyer Collier would obtain for him a position as leader writer, drama critic, and reporter on the Morning Chronicle. He would continue in such positions until 1847, writing also occasionally for The Times of London. NOBODY COULD GUESS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN NEXT John Payne Collier “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX JOHN PAYNE COLLIER JOHN PAYNE COLLIER 1811 John Payne Collier entered the Middle Temple of the British legal profession. He would not be called to the bar until 1829, in part because of his indiscreet publication in 1819 under the pen name “Amicus Curiae,” of CRITICISMS ON THE BAR. LIFE IS LIVED FORWARD BUT UNDERSTOOD BACKWARD? — NO, THAT’S GIVING TOO MUCH TO THE HISTORIAN’S STORIES. LIFE ISN’T TO BE UNDERSTOOD EITHER FORWARD OR BACKWARD. “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project John Payne Collier HDT WHAT? INDEX JOHN PAYNE COLLIER JOHN PAYNE COLLIER 1819 John Payne Collier’s CRITICISMS ON THE BAR was published under the pen name “Amicus Curiae.” He was brought before the House of Commons on an accusation that as a journalist he had reported incorrectly on a speech by Joseph Hume. THE FUTURE IS MOST READILY PREDICTED IN RETROSPECT “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project John Payne Collier HDT WHAT? INDEX JOHN PAYNE COLLIER JOHN PAYNE COLLIER 1820 John Payne Collier’s THE POETICAL DECAMERON, OR, TEN CONVERSATIONS ON ENGLISH POETS AND POETRY, PARTICULARLY OF THE REIGNS OF ELIZABETH AND JAMES I.
    [Show full text]
  • Fakes in Art
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Universidade de Lisboa: Repositório.UL UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE LETRAS PROGRAMA EM TEORIA DA LITERATURA Fakes in Art Maria Teresa Gonçalves Doutoramento em Estudos de Literatura e Cultura Teoria da Literatura 2013 UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE LETRAS PROGRAMA EM TEORIA DA LITERATURA Fakes in Art Maria Teresa Gonçalves Dissertação orientada por: Professor Doutor Miguel Tamen Doutoramento em Estudos de Literatura e Cultura Teoria da Literatura 2013 To my parents. Contents Acknowledgements 1 Abstract 4 Introduction 5 1. Judgement and Attribution of a Work of Art: What Do Experts Look at? 8 2. Attribution: Luckily It Is Not a Science 27 3. Reattribution and Value 64 4. Authenticity and Value: What Is Wrong with a Forgery? 102 5. Trust, Silence and Implausible Confessions 157 Works Cited 182 Acknowledgements Writing the acknowledgements section has the effect of making all the hard work, worries and doubts that writing a dissertation entails seem less hard. Knowing there would be a lot of people to thank and share this work with is one of the reasons why it was worth doing. First, I would like to thank Professor Miguel Tamen for his support, patient guidance and invaluable suggestions throughout all the stages of the process. His supervision and seminars reminded me how thrilling changing one’s mind can be. To Professor António M. Feijó I owe much encouragement and stimulating questions. Some years ago, I learnt that spending a whole semester reading Hamlet is not too long – something I would never have realised had I not attended his lectures.
    [Show full text]