DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloaded from Brill.Com09/25/2021 12:48:51AM Via Free Access T  E,  143, 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MARTIN SPIES Munich, Germany A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF HOLARCTIC PARACHIRONOMUS LENZ (DIPTERA: CHIRONOMIDAE), WITH TWO NEW SPECIES AND A PROVISIONAL KEY TO NEARCTIC ADULT MALES Spies, M. 2000. A contribution to the knowledge of Holarctic Parachironomus Lenz (Diptera: Chironomidae), with two new species and a provisional key to Nearctic adult males. – Tijd- schrift voor Entomologie: 143: 125-143, figs. 1-13, tables 1-5. [ISSN 0040-7496]. Published 5 July 2000. The Palaearctic Parachironomus monochromus (van der Wulp, 1874) and the Holarctic P. tenuicaudatus (Malloch, 1915) are redescribed in the male adult, pupal and larval stages. North American records of monochromus are shown to be misidentifications, and two new Nearctic species are described: P. hazelriggi, sp. n. (adult male, pupa, larva), and P. gillespieae, sp. n. (adult male). P. pediformis Lenz, 1951 is a new junior synonym of P. tenuicaudatus. A provisional key is given for Nearctic adult males of the genus, including several unnamed species. P. digitalis (Edwards, 1929), guarani Spies, Fittkau & Reiss, 1994, and parilis (Walker, 1856) are newly recorded from the Nearctic region. Correspondence: Martin Spies, Schrämelstr. 151, D-81247 München, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Key words. – Diptera; Chironomidae; Parachironomus; Holarctic; taxonomy; description; key. During studies on nuisance Chironomidae in the autapomorphies or simple character sets have been greater Los Angeles urban area (USA, California), identified distinguishing them from all their con- adult males of the genus Parachironomus Lenz were geners. Thus, the selection of species for the present encountered, which according to the North Ameri- work perhaps does not form a monophyletic group- can reference literature represented the originally Eu- ing, but is rather a result of the author’s interpretation ropean species monochromus (van der Wulp, 1874). of the available information. More associations of still Simultaneously collected pupal exuviae, however, did undiscovered or poorly known Parachironomus imma- not match the descriptions of monochromus, but ap- ture stages, and the integration of data on all stages are peared to be P. tenuicaudatus (Malloch, 1915). Cer- required for an authoritative Holarctic revision. tain transatlantic differences in monochromus male hypopygial morphology – first noticed by Goetghe- MATERIAL AND METHODS buer (1951) – were also apparent. A wide array of material and references has been The species analyzed here have in the course of 140 studied to resolve these inconsistencies and identify years been mentioned in many publications. For prac- the southern Californian species, extending the origi- tical reasons it is not possible to evaluate all that mate- nal problem. The North American Parachironomus rial. Analogously, the historic listings under each fauna clearly is not as well described as assumed, and species heading below do not contain all known refer- a full review of Holarctic scope is required. As a first ences, but instead only those essential to finding nec- step, the present study attempts to resolve a limited essary information. For example, since most authors set of outstanding problems, and identifies others. treating North American material followed Townes’ The species treated here are presently inseparable as (1945) concepts, such contributions are only cited in larvae (3 of 4 known), and differ little to moderately in special cases. Unverified records are indicated by a ‘?’. pupal and adult male morphologies (P. monochromus Relevant details are discussed in ‘Notes’ sections fol- more noticeably in both stages). However, no shared lowing the historic listings. 125 Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 12:48:51AM via free access T E, 143, 2000 Wherever possible, standard morphological termi- INHS Illinois Natural History Survey (Cham- nology is followed (combined from Sæther 1980, paign) Cranston & Reiss 1983, Coffman 1986, Pinder & ISNB Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Reiss 1986, and Oliver & Dillon 1989). Some special Belgique (Brussels, Belgium) adult characters are evaluated according to Spies et al. JES James E. Sublette (Tucson, Arizona) (1994: 62). Pupal setae showing at least partial lamel- JHE John H. Epler (Crawfordville, Florida) lar widening are called ‘semi-taeniate’ or ‘taeniate’ af- MJB Michael J. Bolton (Columbus, Ohio) ter a suggestion by Langton (1994). The whorl of OCVCD Orange County Vector Control District clear spines in the ventral, postero-lateral corners of (Garden Grove, California) some abdominal segments on the pupa is called ‘vor- PHL Peter H. Langton (Coleraine, Northern tex’ (plural ‘vortices’) after Langton (1999). Also see Ireland) the latter reference for definitions of the pupal WFBM W. F. Barr Entomological Museum, Uni- paratergites and parasternites. versity of Idaho (Moscow) Two new terms are here introduced to facilitate de- USNM United States National Museum of Natural scription of group- or species-diagnostic character History (Washington, D.C.) states. ‘Caudal’ setae of the adult male anal tergite are ZMAN Zoölogisch Museum, Universiteit van Am- those grouped around the origin of the anal point sterdam (Netherlands) and/or lining a proximal stretch of the latter. ‘Portal se- ZSM Zoologische Staatssammlung München tae’ identifies a bilaterally paired set often clearly distin- (Germany) guishable anterior to the ventralmost caudal setae, on a ledge or prominence(s) posteroventral to (‘at the en- SYSTEMATIC PART trance of’) the inner genital area (see figs. 1-5). Outside of the present study, examples for portal setae and their Parachironomus monochromus (van der Wulp) taxonomic value (see Spies et al. 1994) are Parachirono- (figs. 1, 3) mus manaos Spies, Fittkau & Reiss, 1994, P. puberulus (Edwards, 1931), and P. vistosus Paggi, 1979. Chironomus unicolor van der Wulp, 1859a: 5, 1859b: 5, For the adult male stage, table 5 allows direct com- 1859c: 32, 1859d: 162 (primary homonym of C. unicolor parisons of non-hypopygial characters. The text de- Walker, 1848; adult male). Chironomus monochromus van der Wulp, 1874: 129 (re- scriptions give features not listed in the table, but also placement name for C. unicolor van der Wulp, 1859 nec repeat those warranting special mention. Walker, 1848). Meristic data are generally presented in the format: Chironomus (Cryptochironomus) claviforceps Edwards, 1929: value range (number of values). If the value distribu- 389 (adult male; see below under ‘Notes’, item 1). tion is significantly skewed, n is preceded by the me- Tendipes (Parachironomus) monochromus: Kruseman, 1933: 192 (synonymization of claviforceps Edwards; adult dian value: x-y (M; n). male). Data on bilaterally paired and discrete structures Tendipes (Cryptochironomus) monochromus: Goetghebuer, (e.g. number of thoracic dorsocentral setae) are given 1937-1954: 46 (adult male). for one body side only. Structures interpretable as ? ‘Parachironomus monochromus v. d. Wulp. var. Goetgh.’: fused pairs without a distinct gap are evaluated in full Lenz, 1938: 712 (larva, pupa; see below under ‘Notes’, (e.g. caudal setae around anal point origin). item 2). Parachironomus monochromus: Lehmann, 1970: 146 (adult male); ? Rodova, 1978: 99 (adult female); Albu, 1980: Abbreviations of life stages: ex = exuviae, L = larva, 131 (adult male; see below under ‘Notes’, item 4); Lang- P = pupa, ph = pharate. ton, 1991: 274 (pupa); Kobayashi & Suzuki, 1999: 82 Abbreviations of names and institutions (USA un- (adult male; see below under ‘Notes’, item 4). less otherwise stated): AEI American Entomological Institute (Gaines- Notes on nomenclature and identification ville, Florida) 1. Goetghebuer (1921) was the first subsequent au- ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadel- thor to apply the name monochromus van der Wulp to phia (Pennsylvania) a morphological concept. He used it for specimens BAC Broughton A. Caldwell (Lawrenceville, clearly belonging to P. tenuicaudatus (Malloch), and Georgia) for that reason later (1928: 81, 155) called baciliger BMNH The Natural History Museum (London, Kieffer a junior synonym. Edwards (1929) followed UK) Goetghebuer’s opinion, and separately described his FAMU Florida A&M University (Tallahassee) new claviforceps. Kruseman (1933) verified that van GLACVCD Greater Los Angeles County Vector der Wulp’s type of monochromus was lost, and reinter- Control District (Santa Fe Springs, Califor- preted the species because Goetghebuer’s specimens nia) had the legs unicolorous, not partially darkened as 126 Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 12:48:51AM via free access S: Holarctic Parachironomus van der Wulp had described them. Thus, claviforceps Pex+(; Bavaria, pond nr. Wolfsegg E of Landshut, 14.v.1983, F. Reiss (ZSM). 2(; Bavaria, Inn river at Perach, Edwards, instead of baciliger Kieffer, became a junior 9.vi.1977, leg. Utschick (ZSM). – NETHERLANDS: 3(; synonym of monochromus. Goetghebuer (1937-1954) Voorst, ‘Yselarm’, 18.viii.1930, M. C. Jansen & G. Kruse- accepted Kruseman’s solution which has been the ba- man (ZMAN, author’s coll.). – UNITED KINGDOM: 1(; Eng- sis of the Palaearctic concept for monochromus van der land, Hertfordshire, Letchworth, vi.1918, F. W. Edwards Wulp ever since. (syntype claviforceps Edwards; at BMNH). 1(; England, The author has slide-mounted three males from the Cambridgeshire, March, fishpond in Maple Grove, 4.v.1973, G. W. Simpson (PHL). 1 LexPex; as previous exc. Kruseman collection at ZMAN, as well as the male 5.vi.1973 (PHL). 1 Pex;
Recommended publications
  • CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research

    CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research

    CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research No. 25 ISSN 0172-1941 (printed) 1891-5426 (online) November 2012 CONTENTS Editorial: Inventories - What are they good for? 3 Dr. William P. Coffman: Celebrating 50 years of research on Chironomidae 4 Dear Sepp! 9 Dr. Marta Margreiter-Kownacka 14 Current Research Sharma, S. et al. Chironomidae (Diptera) in the Himalayan Lakes - A study of sub- fossil assemblages in the sediments of two high altitude lakes from Nepal 15 Krosch, M. et al. Non-destructive DNA extraction from Chironomidae, including fragile pupal exuviae, extends analysable collections and enhances vouchering 22 Martin, J. Kiefferulus barbitarsis (Kieffer, 1911) and Kiefferulus tainanus (Kieffer, 1912) are distinct species 28 Short Communications An easy to make and simple designed rearing apparatus for Chironomidae 33 Some proposed emendations to larval morphology terminology 35 Chironomids in Quaternary permafrost deposits in the Siberian Arctic 39 New books, resources and announcements 43 Finnish Chironomidae 47 Chironomini indet. (Paratendipes?) from La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Photo by Carlos de la Rosa. CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research Editors Torbjørn EKREM, Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Peter H. LANGTON, 16, Irish Society Court, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, Northern Ireland BT52 1GX The CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research is devoted to all aspects of chironomid research and aims to be an updated news bulletin for the Chironomidae research community. The newsletter is published yearly in October/November, is open access, and can be downloaded free from this website: http:// www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/chironomus. Publisher is the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, Norway.
  • Dear Colleagues

    Dear Colleagues

    NEW RECORDS OF CHIRONOMIDAE (DIPTERA) FROM CONTINENTAL FRANCE Joel Moubayed-Breil Applied ecology, 10 rue des Fenouils, 34070-Montpellier, France, Email: [email protected] Abstract Material recently collected in Continental France has allowed me to generate a list of 83 taxa of chironomids, including 37 new records to the fauna of France. According to published data on the chironomid fauna of France 718 chironomid species are hitherto known from the French territories. The nomenclature and taxonomy of the species listed are based on the last version of the Chironomidae data in Fauna Europaea, on recent revisions of genera and other recent publications relevant to taxonomy and nomenclature. Introduction French territories represent almost the largest Figure 1. Major biogeographic regions and subregions variety of aquatic ecosystems in Europe with of France respect to both physiographic and hydrographic aspects. According to literature on the chironomid fauna of France, some regions still are better Sites and methodology sampled then others, and the best sampled areas The identification of slide mounted specimens are: The northern and southern parts of the Alps was aided by recent taxonomic revisions and keys (regions 5a and 5b in figure 1); western, central to adults or pupal exuviae (Reiss and Säwedal and eastern parts of the Pyrenees (regions 6, 7, 8), 1981; Tuiskunen 1986; Serra-Tosio 1989; Sæther and South-Central France, including inland and 1990; Soponis 1990; Langton 1991; Sæther and coastal rivers (regions 9a and 9b). The remaining Wang 1995; Kyerematen and Sæther 2000; regions located in the North, the Middle and the Michiels and Spies 2002; Vårdal et al.
  • Kiefferulus Tendipediformis GOETGH. Und Tanytarsus Excavatus EDW. — Zwei Für Österreich Neue Chironomidenarten (Diptera, Nematocera)

    Kiefferulus Tendipediformis GOETGH. Und Tanytarsus Excavatus EDW. — Zwei Für Österreich Neue Chironomidenarten (Diptera, Nematocera)

    ©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Ann. Naturhistor. Mus. Wien 78 385-391 Wien, Dezember 1974 Kiefferulus tendipediformis GOETGH. und Tanytarsus excavatus EDW. — zwei für Österreich neue Chironomidenarten (Diptera, Nematocera) Von RUTH LICHTENBEEG X) (Mit einer Textabbildung) Manuskript eingelangt am 2. April 1974 Zusammenfassung Im Rahmen von Untersuchungen an einem südlich von Wien gelegenen Ziegelteich (Hallateich) wurden neben verschiedenen anderen Wasserinsekten auch Chironomiden gesammelt. Die in der vorliegenden Arbeit aufgezählten Chironomiden gehören den Unterfamilien der Chironominae und Tanypodinae an (Orthocladiinae waren in dem aufgesammelten Material weniger vertreten und sind hier nicht berücksichtigt). Die hier genannten Chironomidenarten sind alle in stehenden größeren oder kleineren Gewässern verbreitet. In dem bearbeiteten Material werden zwei Arten angeführt, die bisher aus Österreich nicht bekannt waren : Kiefferulus tendipediformis GOETGH. und Tanytarsus excavatus EDW. Summary Occasionally of investigations on a pond south of Vienna (Hallateich) Chironomidae had also been collected. The species mentioned here belong to the subfamilies of Chirono- minae and Tanypodinae (Orthocladiinae had been found not so frequent and are not considered). They all are common in standing waters of different sizes. In the samples were two species, which had not yet been known from Austria : Kiefferulus tendipediformis GOETGH. and Tanytarsus excavatus EDW. Einleitung Im Rahmen hydrobiologischer Untersuchungen an einem südlich von Wien bei Vösendorf gelegenen Ziegelteich (Hallateich) wurden von 1963 bis 1968 während einiger Nächte auch Lichtfänge durchgeführt. In den Proben einer Nachtausfahrt vom August 1965 waren unter anderem auch Imagines der beiden aus Österreich bisher noch nicht bekannten Chironomidenarten Kiefferulus tendipediformis GOETGH. und Tanytarsus excavatus EDW. in größerer Anzahl vertreten. x) Anschrift der Verfasserin : Dr.
  • Chironominae 8.1

    Chironominae 8.1

    CHIRONOMINAE 8.1 SUBFAMILY CHIRONOMINAE 8 DIAGNOSIS: Antennae 4-8 segmented, rarely reduced. Labrum with S I simple, palmate or plumose; S II simple, apically fringed or plumose; S III simple; S IV normal or sometimes on pedicel. Labral lamellae usually well developed, but reduced or absent in some taxa. Mentum usually with 8-16 well sclerotized teeth; sometimes central teeth or entire mentum pale or poorly sclerotized; rarely teeth fewer than 8 or modified as seta-like projections. Ventromental plates well developed and usually striate, but striae reduced or vestigial in some taxa; beard absent. Prementum without dense brushes of setae. Body usually with anterior and posterior parapods and procerci well developed; setal fringe not present, but sometimes with bifurcate pectinate setae. Penultimate segment sometimes with 1-2 pairs of ventral tubules; antepenultimate segment sometimes with lateral tubules. Anal tubules usually present, reduced in brackish water and marine taxa. NOTESTES: Usually the most abundant subfamily (in terms of individuals and taxa) found on the Coastal Plain of the Southeast. Found in fresh, brackish and salt water (at least one truly marine genus). Most larvae build silken tubes in or on substrate; some mine in plants, dead wood or sediments; some are free- living; some build transportable cases. Many larvae feed by spinning silk catch-nets, allowing them to fill with detritus, etc., and then ingesting the net; some taxa are grazers; some are predacious. Larvae of several taxa (especially Chironomus) have haemoglobin that gives them a red color and the ability to live in low oxygen conditions. With only one exception (Skutzia), at the generic level the larvae of all described (as adults) southeastern Chironominae are known.
  • "SRS Ecology Environmental Information Document," Chapter 7

    "SRS Ecology Environmental Information Document," Chapter 7

    Chapter 7 Additional Information to Support Research on the Ecology of SRS This page is intentionally left blank. WSRC-TR-97-0223 7-2 WSRC-TR-97-0223 Environmental Information Document-SRS Ecology Chapter 7-Additional Information Introduction Introduction The preceding chapters of this document have dealt primarily with the direct effects of man's activities on Savannah River Site (SRS) natural resources. Since its creation in 1950, SRS has served as a unique resource for scientists studying the ecology of the Southeast, beginning with Dr. E. P. Odum's early work on theories of plant community succession that he tested in the old agricultural fields of SRS. This chapter identifies additional sources of data on the SRS natural environment and sum marizes an ecological investigation of the Burial Ground Complex. Scientists at the Savan nah River Technology Center (SRTC), the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL), and the Savannah River Forest Station (SRFS) have published more than 2000 technical papers detailing research done at SRS under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Information on this research is available through the various organizations, all of which are at the SRS. Remote Sensing Data Remote sensing data have been used to evaluate SRS's natural resources and to monitor the environmental effects of operations since the early 1950s. From the beginning, the U.S. For est Service used vertical aerial photography to support SRS timber resource management. Numerous other overflights have been conducted, such as those by the National High Alti tude Program and the DOE Remote Sensing Laboratory.
  • A Guide for the Identification of Two Subfamilies of Larval Chironomidae

    A Guide for the Identification of Two Subfamilies of Larval Chironomidae

    Envlronment Canada Environnement Canada Fisheries Service des pêches .1 and Marine Service et des sciences de la mer L .' 1 '; ( 1 l r A Guide for the Identification of Two Subfamil ies of Larval Chironomidae: ,1"'--- The Chironominae and Tanypodlnae . : - - . ) / Found .in Benthic Studies Jin the / r~---.-_ c L___ r - - '" - .Ç"'''''-. Winnipeg River in the Vicinity ot Pine Falls, Manitoba in 1971 and 1972 by P. L. Stewart J.S. Loch Technical Report Series No. CEN/T-73-12 Resource Management Branch Central Region DEPARTMÈNT OF THE ENViRONMENT FISHERIES AND MARINE SERViCE Fisheries Operations Directorate Central Region Technical Reports Series No. CEN/T-73-12 A guide for the identification of two subfami lies of larva l Chironomidae~ the Chironominae and Tanypodinae found in benthic studies in the Winnipeg Riv~r in the vicinity of Pine Falls, Manitoba, in 1971 and 1972. by: P.L. Stewart qnd J.S. Loch ERRATA Page13: The caption for Figure 5A should read: Mentum and ventromental plates..•... instead of: submentum and ventromental plates..•.. Page 14: The caption for Figure 5B should read: Mentum and ventromental plates . instead of: submentum and ventromental plates.... DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT FISHERIES AND MARINE SERVICE Fisheries Operations Directorate Central Region Technical Report Series No: CEN/T-73-12 A GUIDE FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF IWO SUBF.AMILIES OF LARVM.... CHIRONOMIDAE: THE CHIRONOMINAE AND TANYPODINAE FOUND IN BENTHIC STUDIES IN THE WINNIPEG RIVER IN THE vrCINITY OF PINE FM....LS, MANITOBA IN 1971 and 1972 by P. L. Stewart and J. S. Loch Resource Management Branch Fisheries Operations Directorate Central Region, Winnipeg November 1973 i ABSTRACT Identifying characteristics of the genera of two subfamilies of larvae of the midge family, C~onomldae (Vlpt~a), the C~ono­ mlnae and the Tanypodlnae, are presented with illustrations for the purpose of simplifying identification of these two groups by novice and more experienced personnel involved in assessment of benthic faunal composition.
  • Checklist of the Family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland

    Checklist of the Family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 63–90 (2014)Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland 63 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland Lauri Paasivirta1 1 Ruuhikoskenkatu 17 B 5, FI-24240 Salo, Finland Corresponding author: Lauri Paasivirta ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Kahanpää | Received 10 March 2014 | Accepted 26 August 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/F3343ED1-AE2C-43B4-9BA1-029B5EC32763 Citation: Paasivirta L (2014) Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 63–90. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 Abstract A checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) recorded from Finland is presented. Keywords Finland, Chironomidae, species list, biodiversity, faunistics Introduction There are supposedly at least 15 000 species of chironomid midges in the world (Armitage et al. 1995, but see Pape et al. 2011) making it the largest family among the aquatic insects. The European chironomid fauna consists of 1262 species (Sæther and Spies 2013). In Finland, 780 species can be found, of which 37 are still undescribed (Paasivirta 2012). The species checklist written by B. Lindeberg on 23.10.1979 (Hackman 1980) included 409 chironomid species. Twenty of those species have been removed from the checklist due to various reasons. The total number of species increased in the 1980s to 570, mainly due to the identification work by me and J. Tuiskunen (Bergman and Jansson 1983, Tuiskunen and Lindeberg 1986).
  • Table of Contents 2

    Table of Contents 2

    Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) List of Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Taxa from California and Adjacent States including Standard Taxonomic Effort Levels 1 March 2011 Austin Brady Richards and D. Christopher Rogers Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 Acknowledgments 5 2.0 Standard Taxonomic Effort 5 2.1 Rules for Developing a Standard Taxonomic Effort Document 5 2.2 Changes from the Previous Version 6 2.3 The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic List 6 3.0 Methods and Materials 7 3.1 Habitat information 7 3.2 Geographic Scope 7 3.3 Abbreviations used in the STE List 8 3.4 Life Stage Terminology 8 4.0 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species 8 5.0 Literature Cited 9 Appendix I. The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic Effort List 10 Phylum Silicea 11 Phylum Cnidaria 12 Phylum Platyhelminthes 14 Phylum Nemertea 15 Phylum Nemata 16 Phylum Nematomorpha 17 Phylum Entoprocta 18 Phylum Ectoprocta 19 Phylum Mollusca 20 Phylum Annelida 32 Class Hirudinea Class Branchiobdella Class Polychaeta Class Oligochaeta Phylum Arthropoda Subphylum Chelicerata, Subclass Acari 35 Subphylum Crustacea 47 Subphylum Hexapoda Class Collembola 69 Class Insecta Order Ephemeroptera 71 Order Odonata 95 Order Plecoptera 112 Order Hemiptera 126 Order Megaloptera 139 Order Neuroptera 141 Order Trichoptera 143 Order Lepidoptera 165 2 Order Coleoptera 167 Order Diptera 219 3 1.0 Introduction The Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) is charged through its charter to develop standardized levels for the taxonomic identification of aquatic macroinvertebrates in support of bioassessment. This document defines the standard levels of taxonomic effort (STE) for bioassessment data compatible with the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) bioassessment protocols (Ode, 2007) or similar procedures.
  • Bibliograp Bibliography

    Bibliograp Bibliography

    BIBLIOGRAPHY 9.1 BIBLIOGRAPHY 9 Adam, J.I & O.A. Sæther. 1999. Revision of the records for the southern United States genus Nilothauma Kieffer, 1921 (Diptera: (Diptera: Chironomidae). J. Ga. Ent. Soc. Chironomidae). Ent. scand. Suppl. 56: 1- 15:69-73. 107. Beck, W.M., Jr. & E.C. Beck. 1966. Chironomidae Ali, A. 1991. Perspectives on management of pest- (Diptera) of Florida - I. Pentaneurini (Tany- iferous Chironomidae (Diptera), an emerg- podinae). Bull. Fla. St. Mus. Biol. Sci. ing global problem. J. Am. Mosq. Control 10:305-379. Assoc. 7: 260-281. Beck, W.M., Jr., & E.C. Beck. 1970. The immature Armitage, P., P.S. Cranston & L.C.V. Pinder (eds). stages of some Chironomini (Chiro- 1995. The Chironomidae. Biology and nomidae). Q.J. Fla. Acad. Sci. 33:29-42. ecology of non-biting midges. Chapman & Bilyj, B. 1984. Descriptions of two new species of Hall, London. 572 pp. Tanypodinae (Diptera: Chironomidae) from Ashe, P. 1983. A catalogue of chironomid genera Southern Indian Lake, Canada. Can. J. Fish. and subgenera of the world including syn- Aquat. Sci. 41: 659-671. onyms (Diptera: Chironomidae). Ent. Bilyj, B. 1985. New placement of Tanypus pallens scand. Suppl. 17: 1-68. Coquillett, 1902 nec Larsia pallens (Coq.) Barton, D.R., D.R. Oliver & M.E. Dillon. 1993. sensu Roback 1971 (Diptera: Chironomi- The first Nearctic record of Stackelbergina dae) and redescription of the holotype. Can. Shilova and Zelentsov (Diptera: Chironomi- Ent. 117: 39-42. dae): Taxonomic and ecological observations. Bilyj, B. 1988. A taxonomic review of Guttipelopia Aquatic Insects 15: 57-63. (Diptera: Chironomidae).
  • The University of Kansas Field Station and Ecological Reserves

    The University of Kansas Field Station and Ecological Reserves

    The University of Kansas Field Station and Ecological Reserves A HALF CENTURY OF RESEARCH AND EDUCATION THE MISSION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS FIELD STATION AND ECOLOGICAL RESERVES IS TO FOSTER SCHOLARLY RESEARCH, ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION, AND SCIENCE-BASED STEWARDSHIP OF NATURAL RESOURCES. CONTENTS From the Director 1 Overview 2 Robinson Tract 36 Research Management Plan 7 Geohydrologic Experimental and Monitoring Site 37 Summaries of Tracts 9 Hall Nature Reserve 38 Research 13 Breidenthal Biological Reserve 39 Rice Woodland 41 Land Management and Stewardship 21 Wall Woods 41 Teaching and Outreach 22 Fitch Natural History Reservation 42 Research Support 24 University of Kansas Support, Affiliate Administration 24 Programs, and Other Resources 45 Global Perspective 25 Organizational Chart 47 Tracts and Facilities 26 Resident Faculty and Staff Investigators 48 Nelson Environmental Study Area 26 Externally Funded Research: 1985–2000 52 Frank B. Cross Reservoir 29 Kansas Aquatic Mesocosm Program 30 Theses and Dissertations: 1949–2000 54 Biotic Succession/Habitat Publications: 1949–2000 58 Fragmentation Facility 32 Credits 68 Rockefeller Experimental Tract 34 From the Director The University of Kansas Field Station and Ecological Reserves Woods, which was designated in 1980 as a National Natural Landmark, (KSR) recently celebrated its 50th anniversary. It seems fitting at this time and provides opportunities to study native plants and animals within a to summarize the growth and development of the field station during its minimally disturbed setting. first half century, and to recognize the contributions of the many dedicated The 44-hectare (108-acre) Robinson Tract, another portion of the people whose efforts have produced a rich tradition of research, education original farm of Governor Robinson, was added in 1970 and in addition to and stewardship.
  • Cryptochironomus. an Identification Key to the Larvae and Pupal Exuviae in Europe

    Cryptochironomus. an Identification Key to the Larvae and Pupal Exuviae in Europe

    ©Erik Mauch Verlag, Dinkelscherben, Deutschland,1 Download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Lauterbornia 55: 1-22, D-86424 Dinkelscherben, 2005-08-19 Cryptochironomus. An identification key to the larvae and pupal exuviae in Europe Henk J. Vallenduuk and E. Morozova With 35 figures and 5 tables Keywords: Cryptochironomus, Diptera, Insecta, The Netherlands, Volga, Russia, Europe morphology, identification, distribution, larva, pupa, exuvia Schlagwörter: Cryptochironomus, Diptera, Insecta, Niederlande, Wolga, Russland, Europa, Morphologie, Bestimmung, Verbreitung, Larve, Puppe, Exuvie The genus Cryptochironomus Kieffer is represented in Europe by about ten species. An illustrated key to the pupal exuviae and larvae is given to the known and suggested species. The autecology unfortunately is little known. 1 Introduction For the assessment of species specific characters it is necessary to have larvae for which the specific identification is certain. Only by rearing larvae to adults can this be achieved. Some years ago we began collecting larvae and rearing them to adult. When successful, this provides the adult and the pupal and larval exuviae. The pupal exuviae enable accurate identifications using the keys of Langton (1991) and Langton & Visser (2003). (The pupal exuviae of C rypto­ chironomus defectus (Kieffer) was not included in the earlier key, but as a result of our rearing program, has been included in the 2003 one.) The adults of Cryptochironomus are very difficult to separate. Morozova has also investigated the larvae cytologically. When all instars of all species have been obtained, it will be possible to make a full revision of the genus; Morozova has embarked on this. In the meantime, the interpretation of the species is that of Langton & Visser (2003).
  • Fly Times 59

    Fly Times 59

    FLY TIMES ISSUE 59, October, 2017 Stephen D. Gaimari, editor Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch California Department of Food & Agriculture 3294 Meadowview Road Sacramento, California 95832, USA Tel: (916) 262-1131 FAX: (916) 262-1190 Email: [email protected] Welcome to the latest issue of Fly Times! As usual, I thank everyone for sending in such interesting articles. I hope you all enjoy reading it as much as I enjoyed putting it together. Please let me encourage all of you to consider contributing articles that may be of interest to the Diptera community for the next issue. Fly Times offers a great forum to report on your research activities and to make requests for taxa being studied, as well as to report interesting observations about flies, to discuss new and improved methods, to advertise opportunities for dipterists, to report on or announce meetings relevant to the community, etc., with all the associated digital images you wish to provide. This is also a great placeto report on your interesting (and hopefully fruitful) collecting activities! Really anything fly-related is considered. And of course, thanks very much to Chris Borkent for again assembling the list of Diptera citations since the last Fly Times! The electronic version of the Fly Times continues to be hosted on the North American Dipterists Society website at http://www.nadsdiptera.org/News/FlyTimes/Flyhome.htm. For this issue, I want to again thank all the contributors for sending me such great articles! Feel free to share your opinions or provide ideas on how to improve the newsletter.