DOCSLIB.ORG

Lifeweb Project Expression of Interest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lifeweb Project Expression of Interest LIFEWEB PROJECT EXPRESSION OF INTEREST NOTES: • The total text provided should generally range between 3 and 5 pages. • Please attach any supporting materials with your submission. • Project Expressions of Interest are accepted in this PDF version and a user-friendly online version available at http://www.cbd.int/lifeweb/projectprofile . SECTION I: BASIC INFORMATION COUNTRY Federated States of Micronesia PROJECT TITLE UTILIZING EFFECTIVE REMOTE MANAGEMENT MECHANISMS TO ENHANCE THE FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA’S LANDSCAPE AND SEASCAPE CONNECTIVITY GEOGRAPHIC SCALE Please check one of the following. X Sub-national X National Multi-national SUBMITTED BY Please check one of the following. X Government Indigenous or Local Community NGO SCOPE Please check all that apply to this project. X Creating new protected area(s) X Strengthening management of existing protected area(s) X Improving the protected area enabling environment If this project’s scope involves the strengthening management of existing protected area(s) , please indicate the names of the area(s) that will be strengthened, among those registered in the World Data Base on Protected Areas (WDPA). If the area(s) are not registered in the WDPA, please indicate the complete name(s) and you will be contacted by the WDPA inviting you to register it. WDPA Registered: Non-WDPA Registered: 1. Oroluk Marine Sanctuary 1. Minto Reef Marine Sanctuary 2. Nukuoro Area of Biological Significance (ABS) 3. Esan Reef ABS 4. Namoluk ABS 5. Nomwin ABS 6. Nomwinweito ABS 7. Pollap ABS 8. Satawal ABS 9. Woleai Atoll ABS 10. Sorol ABS 11. Ulithi ABS 12. Ngulu ABS MAP AND PICTURES Please attach a map situating the project area. If possible, please send at least two pictures and any additional media of the area. See country map (project area) at following URLs http://www.visit-fsm.org/ or http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/islands_oceans_poles/statesmicronesia.jpg ; see picture attachments below SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION LOCAL CONTEXT AND PROBLEMS TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE PROJECT Please describe the area context and challenges (including threats to biodiversity ) being faced. You are welcome to attach supporting documents. The Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) 1 is the largest and most diverse part of the greater Micronesian sub-region of the vast Pacific region. It is a federation of four semi-autonomous island States, in geographic sequence from east to west - Kosrae, Pohnpei, Chuuk and Yap - comprised of 607 islands with land elevation ranging from sea level to the highest elevation of about 2,500 feet (760 m). FSM’s total landmass is 438 square miles (702 km²), with a declared Exclusive Economic Zone covering over 1 million square miles (1.6 million km²). Traditional, social and cultural institutions are still very strong in Micronesia. Micronesian society is based on the extended family, which is responsible for the family welfare, especially in relation to customary family land. The indigenous population is Micronesian with most of the people residing on the main islands of the State capitals. Its marine and terrestrial biodiversity are the nation’s living wealth in which species endemism is high among the terrestrial biota. The high endemism within the nation is a direct result of the isolation of the islands to one another and to other landmasses in the greater Micronesian region. Land and aquatic tenure varies between States where the two most Eastern States – Kosrae and Pohnpei, land is both privately and State owned, while aquatic areas are managed by the State as public trusts. In Chuuk, most land and aquatic areas are privately owned and acquired through inheritance, gift or, recently, by purchase. In Yap, almost all land and aquatic areas are owned or managed by individual estates and usage is subject to traditional control. In all States, land cannot be sold to non-citizens of the FSM, thus these land and aquatic ownership patterns greatly influence the strategies and actions required to sustainably manage the biodiversity of the nation. Thus a necessity in engaging these local stakeholders to raise their awareness on and address certain threats which include explicit increasing pressures from climate change, resource over-harvest, non-application of efficient- selective technology and land-based sources of pollution. The responsibility for environmental issues is shared between the FSM National Government and the individual FSM State governments. The sharing of responsibility has at times resulted in legislation that appears duplicated at the State and National levels. It has also resulted in gaps in legislation and areas in which the location of responsibility between the State and National Governments has been less than clear. Each State has made efforts to control development and manage natural resources through the creation of land use plans, coastal zone plans, legislation and regulations. The National Government provides guidance and technical assistance to the States when needed and requested on matters related to planning, economic development, natural resources, fisheries, and the environment. The Federated States of Micronesia Protected Areas Network (FSM-PAN) Project <http://www.protectedareas.org/ > has been developed to address the Convention on Biological Programme of Work on Protected Areas in which the project’s four outcomes set the foundation of establishing a protected areas network to address the above mentioned natural resource management issues in a systematic framework. Most of the FSM’s existing PAs use a combination of traditional and legislative controls. This dual authority approach has been quite successful, and it is locally perceived to 1 http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/islands_oceans_poles/statesmicronesia.jpg be an effective way of establishing protected areas. The development of a national protected areas network offers a major opportunity to provide a framework for the FSM’s national and state governments to collaborate on the dual objectives of protecting the country’s terrestrial and marine biodiversity and assisting with local management of natural resources through establishing an interconnected network of protected areas. The decentralized political situation in the FSM and the prevalence of private and/or traditional control of lands and waters throughout the nation necessitates broad public consultations to build public understanding of and will toward the importance of conservation and the role of protected areas. In addition, many of the nation’s areas of biodiversity significance are remote and isolated, requiring a significant management role by local communities and land-owners. It is envisioned that most protected areas will be initiated at the community level, where they will be well-supported locally and address local resource over-exploitation concerns. Involving as many stakeholders as possible in the development of the national protected areas network will ensure eventual success. ECOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTION Please indicate the extent to which the area(s) is/are ecological priority(s) for the national protected area system, based on contribution to ecological representation, connectivity, viability and/or irreplaceability within the protected area system. If possible, please refer to the national ecological gap analysis or other geographic prioritisation exercises and attach supporting documents. Through a 2003 enabling activity under the FSM National Biodiversity Strategic Plan Project <http://www.fsmgov.org/biodiv02.pdf >, a geographic prioritization exercise was conducted by FSM national and state governments, technical partners, institutional and local experts which identified 130 Areas of Biological Significance (ABS) nation-wide where produced a Blueprint for Conserving the Biodiversity of the FSM <http://conserveonline.org/library/MicroPg1-47_main.pdf/view.html >. Currently the FSM-PAN Project is conducting gap analysis iterations utilizing the MARXAN analysis tool and collaborating with similar on-going geographical prioritization projects (e.g. FSM Forestry State-wide Assessment and Resource Strategies Project), gap assessment projects (e.g. FSM Atoll Food Security Vulnerability and Adaptive Assessment) and geodatabase project. OBJECTIVES AND RESULTS Please provide a brief description of objectives and estimate of funding required for each, as well as the overall expected results. FUNDING OBJECTIVES EXPECTED RESULT REQUIRED 1. Strengthening existing and garnering more $ 35,405 ••• Increased Organizational Signatories to the social and political support on national and sub- FSM National Implementation Support national remote management schemes Partnership Agreement for through existing effective and innovative Implementation of COP-7 Program of Work engagement mechanisms (FSM-NISP) and institutional commitment ••• Enabling environment for enhanced protected areas network incorporating landscape and seascape connectivity ••• Proactive integrative traditional, sub- national and national governance system on a remote management network ••• Contributing to the Micronesia Challenge targets 2. Promoting connectivity and creating $ 63,392 ••• Demonstrating landscape and seascape appropriate linkages amongst the targeted linkages within a national context remote sites within FSM Protected Areas ••• Food Security vulnerability and adaptive Network (FSM-PAN) coverage to enhance baseline set through an integrative atoll climate change adaptation and/or resiliency ecosystem assessment of targeted FSM outlying atolls ••• Expanding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mangroves Occurring on the Many Islands in the South Pacific Are Only a Small Component When Compared to the Worldwide Inventory of Mangroves
    TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND SUPPORT FOR MANGROVE AND LITTORAL FOREST MANAGEMENT, PLANNING AND TRAINING FOR SMALL ISLANDS IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC Jan. 25, 2004 by James Denny Ward USDA Forest Service i FOREWORD Mangroves occurring on the many islands in the South Pacific are only a small component when compared to the worldwide inventory of mangroves. Although the mangroves found on the smaller islands may not seem as important on the global scale, they are extremely important to the small individual countries. Some of their benefits include shoreline protection, biodiversity, fisheries and a source for traditional products like building material, fuelwood and various cultural uses. These benefits are even more important to small island countries with limited resources and contributed to the survival of the indigenous people in earlier times. Realizing the importance of the mangrove resource the Forest & Trees Support Programme of SPC and the Heads of Forestry in the Pacific in cooperation with the USDA Forest Service conducted several missions during the last 10 years to assist the smaller island countries with preserving, protecting and managing their mangroves . The USDA Forest Service’s Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry based in Hawaii has been providing assistance to the Federated States of Micronesia and other islands with close ties to the United States for several years. Research conducted by this group has contributed greatly to the information base needed to manage mangroves throughout the South Pacific. This report is not all-inclusive but it is hoped that it will contain sufficient information to assist small islands in developing a management strategy for their individual countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals of Pakin Atoll, Eastern Caroline Islands
    Micronesica 29(1): 37-48 , 1996 Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals of Pakin Atoll, Eastern Caroline Islands DONALD W. BUDEN Division Mathematics of and Science, College of Micronesia, P. 0 . Box 159 Kolonia, Polmpei, Federated States of Micronesia 96941. Abstract-Fifteen species of reptiles, 18 birds, and five mammals are recorded from Pakin Atoll. None is endemic to Pakin and all of the residents tend to be widely distributed throughout Micronesia. Intro­ duced species include four mammals (Rattus exulans, Canis fami/iaris, Fe/is catus, Sus scrofa), the Red Junglefowl (Gallus gal/us) among birds, and at least one lizard (Varanus indicus). Of the 17 indigenous birds, ten are presumed or documented breeding residents, including four land birds, a heron, and five terns. The Micronesian Honeyeater (My=omela rubratra) is the most common land bird, followed closely by the Micro­ nesian Starling (Aplonis opaca). The vegetation is mainly Cocos forest, considerably modified by periodic cutting of the undergrowth, deliber­ ately set fires, and the rooting of pigs. Most of the present vertebrate species do not appear to be seriously endangered by present levels of human activity. But the Micronesian Pigeon (Ducula oceanica) is less numerous on the settled islands, probably reflecting increased hunting pressure, and sea turtles (especially Chelonia mydas) and their eggs are harvested indiscriminately . Introduction Terrestrial vertebrates have been poorly studied on many of the remote atolls of Micronesia, and distributional records are lacking or scanty for many islands. The present study documents the occurrence and relative abundance of reptiles, birds, and mammals on Pakin Atoll for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 7 August 2015
    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/23/FSM/1 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 August 2015 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Twenty-third session 2–13 November 2015 National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21* Federated States of Micronesia * The present document has been reproduced as received. Its content does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations. GE.15-13374(E) *1513374* A/HRC/WG.6/23/FSM/1 Acronyms AIDS Auto Immune Deficiency Syndrome CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women CPBR Child Protection Baseline Report CRPD Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability EpiNet Epidemiology Network FHSS Family Health and Safety Study FSM Federated States of Micronesia HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus IAC Inter-Agency Conference ILO International Labor Organization IOM International Organization for Migration MedEvac Medical Evacuation NWC National Women’s Conference OHCHR Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights SDP Strategic Development Plan UNCAC United Nations Conventions Against Corruption UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNFPA United Nations Population Fund VAW Violent Against Women WHO World Health Organization 2 A/HRC/WG.6/23/FSM/1 Background 1. The Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) is comprised of four major island groups totaling 607 islands in the North Pacific Ocean and forming four states in the federation: Chuuk, Kosrae, Pohnpei, and Yap. 2. The FSM was colonized by Spain, Germany, and Japan in the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century, and was administered as a United Nations strategic trusteeship by the United States of America after World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Island Countries and Territories Issued: 19 February 2008
    OCHA Regional Office for Asia Pacific Pacific Island Countries and Territories Issued: 19 February 2008 OCHA Presence in the Pacific Northern Papua New Guinea Fiji Mariana Humanitarian Affairs Unit (HAU), PNG Regional Disaster Response Islands (U.S.) UN House , Level 14, DeloitteTower, Advisor (RDRA), Fiji Douglas Street, PO Box 1041, 360 Victoria Parade, 3rd Floor Fiji +10 Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea Development Bank Building, Suva, FIJI Tel: +675 321 2877 Tel: +679 331 6760, +679 331 6761 International Date Line Fax: +675 321 1224 Fax: +679 330 9762 Saipan Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Head: Vini Talai Head: Peter Muller Agana +12 Guam (U.S.) Pacific Ocean +10 MARSHALL ISLANDS Legend Depth (m) OCHA Presence Below 5,000 1,001 to 2,000 MICRONESIA (FSO) Koror Majuro Country capital Palikir 4,001 to 5,000 501 to 1,000 Territory capital PALAU +11 Illustrative boundary 3,001 to 4,000 101 to 500 +9 +10 Time difference with UTC 2,001 to 3,000 o to 100 Tarawa (New York: UTC -5 Equator NAURU Geneva: UTC +1) IMPORTANT NOTE: The boundaries on this map are for illustrative purposes only Yaren Naming Convention and were derived from the map ’The +12 +12 KIRIBATI UN MEMBER STATE Pacific Islands’ published in 2004 by the Territory or Associated State Secretariat of the Pacific Community. INDONESIA TUVALU -11 -10 PAPUA NEW GUINEA United Nations Office for the Coordination +10 +12 of Humanitarian affairs (OCHA) Funafuti Toke lau (N.Z.) Regional Office for Asia Pacific (ROAP) Honiara Executive Suite, 2nd Floor, -10 UNCC Building,
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Navigation in the Pacific
    Hokkaido Vladivostok New York Philadelphia Beijing North Korea Sea of Tianjin Japan P'yongyang Sacramento Washington Seoul Japan Honshu NORTH San Francisco United States of America China South Tokyo Nagoya Korea Pusan Osaka Los Angeles PACIFIC Cheju-Do Shikoku San Diego Shanghai Kyushu OCEAN New Orleans Guadalupe Island (Mex.) Midway Baja Ryukyu Ogasawara- Islands (US) California Trench Okinawa-Jima (Jap.) Gunto (Jap.) Gulf of Miami Minami-Tori- Hawaiian Islands (US) Shima (Jap.) Mexico Havana Taiwan Kauai Cuba Oahu Mexico Hainan Dao Honolulu Guadalajara Jamaica Mariana Mexico Northern Wake Island (US) Hawaii Revillagigedo Island (Mex.) Kingston Philippine Ridge Belize South Luzon Mariana Islands Johnston Atoll (US) China Sea (US) Guatemala Honduras Manila Saipan Sea Guam (US) Marshall Islands El Salvador Nicaragua Philippines Enewetak Managua Costa Rica Panama Yap Islands Micronesia San José Palawan Ratak Clipperton Island (Fr.) Mindanao Pohnpei Chain Davao Melekeok Satawai Panama Chuuk Palikir Majuro Palmyra Atoll (US) Ralik Cocos Islands (CR) Brunei Palau Kosrae Chain Malaysia Line Malpelo Island (Col.) Federated States of Micronesia Gilbert Islands Howland Island (US) Islands Colombia Halmahera Kalimantan Tarawa Baker Island (US) Bismarck Archipelago Quito Jarvis Island (US) Galapagos Islands (Ec.) Sulawesi New Ireland Nauru Guayaquil Phoenix Islands Kiribati Malden Rabaul Ecuador Seram New Guinea Papua Bougainville Solomon Nanumea Vaiaku Indonesia New Guinea New Britain Santa Isabel Islands Polynesia Surabaya Funafuti Marquesas Islands
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Turtle Newsletter
    Marine Turtle Newsletter Number 41 September 1987 Editor: Nat B. Frazer Department of Biology Mercer University 1400 Coleman Avenue Macon, GA 31207 USA Associate Editor: John P. Eylers Editorial Board: Peter C. H. Pritchard, Anders G. J. Rhodin, Harold F. Hirth, N. Mrosovsky REPORT FROM OROLUK Oroluk is a low coral atoll in the Caroline Islands in the mid-Pacific region. It is located about 1600 km ESE of Guam and about 300 km east from Pohnpei Island. This small island (18 hectares) historically has had large numbers of nesting green turtles, and Pritchard (1977) felt Oroluk was the most important nesting ground in the state. From June through July 1985 and May through August 1986 turtles were tagged and their activities watched. The arrival of turtle project personnel on Oroluk in May 1986 was a sad day for them. The residents of the island (7 people) killed three female turtles and cooked turtle eggs to take with them on the field trip ship back to Pohnpei. Project staff also found that two turtles tagged in May 1985 were eaten in August of the same year. During the 1986 period, some preliminary work was done to protect two nests with wire cages and to look at hatching success. Humerus bones were collected, and forwarded to Dr. George Balazs of US National Marine Fisheries Service in Honolulu. So far, one turtle tagged during the project has been seen elsewhere. A 99 cm female was tagged while nesting on Oroluk 2 June 1986 and laid 72 eggs. The turtle was captured alive in Nan- Way Bay in Taiwan on 18 April 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • IOM Micronesia
    IOM Micronesia Federated States of Micronesia Republic of the Marshall Islands Republic of Palau Newsletter, July 2018 - April 2019 IOM staff Nathan Glancy inspects a damaged house in Chuuk during the JDA. Credit: USAID, 2019 Typhoon Wutip Destruction Typhoon Wutip passed over Pohnpei, Chuuk, and Yap States, FSM between 19 and 22 February with winds of 75–80 mph and gusts of up to 100 mph. Wutip hit the outer islands of Chuuk State, including the ‘Northwest’ islands (Houk, Poluwat, Polap, Tamatam and Onoun) and the ‘Lower and ‘Middle’ Mortlocks islands, as well as the outer islands of Yap (Elato, Fechailap, Lamotrek, Piig and Satawal) before continuing southwest of Guam and slowly dissipating by the end of February. FSM President, H.E. Peter M. Christian issued a Declaration of Disaster on March 11 and requested international assistance to respond to the damage caused by the typhoon. Consistent with the USAID/FEMA Operational Blueprint for Disaster Relief and Reconstruction in the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), a Joint Damage Assessment (JDA) was carried out by representatives of USAID, OFDA, FEMA and the Government of FSM from 18 March to 4 April, with assistance from IOM. The JDA assessed whether Wutip damage qualifies for a US Presidential Disaster Declaration. The JDA found Wutip had caused damage to the infrastructure and agricultural production of 30 islands, The path of Typhoon Wutip Feb 19-22, 2019. Credit: US JDA, 2019. leaving 11,575 persons food insecure. Response to Typhoon Wutip IOM, with the support of USAID/OFDA, has responded with continued distributions of relief items stored in IOM warehouses such as tarps, rope and reverse osmosis (RO) units to affected communities on the outer islands of Chuuk, Yap and Pohnpei states.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Pohnpei Land Use Plan and Implementation Strategy
    ASSESSING POHNPEI LAND USE PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY by Carrie A. Hall Internship Report Submitted To Marine Resource Management Program College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 97331 1997 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Acknowledgments I would like to thank the University of Micronesia and South Pacific Program for providing me the opportunity to work on Pohnpei and be part of this exciting project. I would also like to express my appreciation for all those I worked with on Pohnpei and who contributed to this project, especially my counterparts Emensio Emperiam and Charles Aiken and fellow technical assistants for all for their help, support, and making my stay in Pohnpei wonderful. A special thanks also, to my advisor Jim Good and graduate committee members Bruce DeYoung and Flaxen Conway for their help and advice with the writing of this internship report. Lastly, I would like to thank my family for their support and all my friends who made my time in Corvallis enjoyable. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 1 BACKGROUND 3 Physical Setting 3 History . 7 Social Setting 9 Population 9 Schooling 9 Family . 10 Religion 10 Social Setting 10 Political Setting 11 Economic Setting 12 LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING IN POHNPEI 14 Previous Planning Attempts 14 Why Past Attempts May Have Failed and a Possible Remedy 15 Why Past Attempts May Have Failed . 15 Why Community Involvement is Needed 16 Types of Community Involvement . 17 A Possible Remedy . 19 Current Situation . 21 Organization and Initial Structure For Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Solomon Islands B ! Fagani C D ! Waimapuru ! ! Solomon Sea Mainga Tawani Vanuatu ! ! Rennel Island Manakia
    FRAME B 155°E 160°E Rorovana ! ! ! Torokina Panguna Karakun Koiaris ! ! Papua New Guin! ea Taki ! ! Jaba Sininai ! Pupuku PACIFIC OCEAN Aitara ! ! ! Kaekui Mission ! Birambira ! Tokuaka Susuka !Kombokisa !! Kutakana Lukuvaru Shortland Island PACIFIC OCEAN ! ! Ghaomai Choiseul Zambanarungga Shortland I ! ! Vure ! Trevanion Noka ! ! Mono I Matamotu ! ! ! Masoko Java Malemgeulu ! ! Paraso ! Zuzuao Santa Cruz Islands Apakhö ! ! ! Point Lunga ! Eleoteve Arambu Filuo Vana!! ! ! Litoghahira Sambora Santa Isabel Island FRAME D Kolomb!angara! Ganongga ! New Georgia Islands ! Tapurai Tuarugu ! Biluro ! ! Mburuku Loalonga ! Lokiha ! ! ! Sepi ! Ageraba Harai Mbareho ! Fokinkorra ! S o l o m o n I s l a n d s Auki Kunura ! ! Kwaimbaambaala ! Vura Nggaulai'ato'o ! ! ! Siota !! Manikiriu Tulagi Paunairo Vatupilei ! ! Palikir Abungari !. Koror !. Marshall Islands Malaita Palau Guranja Honiara Micronesia Hularu ! ! .! !Gembua ! Guadalcanal Rere ! Kiribati ! ! PACIFIC OCEAN Solomon Sea Mbaole ! Sitaronda Ahenawai Anoni'usu Nauru Ralavu Raurembo ! Mwarada ! ! ! Ione ! Lakatana ! Ahia I n d o n e s i a Makina 10°S Papua New 10°S Guinea Solomon Sea Honiara Heuru !. Port Moresby !. ! Etamarorai Solomon Islands B ! Fagani C D ! Waimapuru ! ! Solomon Sea Mainga Tawani Vanuatu ! ! Rennel Island Manakia !.Port-Vila ! San Cristobal Australia Vinegau ! New Caledonia Na Wosi ! Funakumwa ! ! !. Hauraha Nouméa FRAME A Napasiwai FRAME C 155°E 160°E Date Created: 04- JUL - 2011 Map Num: LogCluster_SLB_LCA_004 Kilometers .! National Capital Road Network National Boundary Coord.System/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 S O L O M O N GLIDE Num: ! Village (selection) Secondary Surface Waterbody The boundaries and names and the designations 0 50 100 150 200 used on this map do not imply official endorsement I S L A N D S FRAME A Nominal Scale 1:62,420,000 at A4 Tertiary or acceptance by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Invitation for Bids
    Invitation for Bids (Please refer to Corrigendum 1 IFB, published on 22 September 2020) Date: 4 May 2020 Grant No. Grant Nos. 0680-FSM and Title: FSM Renewable Energy Development Project ICB-FSMREDP-01 Contract No. Supply and installation of both rooftop and ground mounted Solar PV and Title: Generation including an integrated Battery Storage system; and Supply and installation of both rooftop and ground mounted Solar PV Generation Deadline for Extended to 9 October 2020 at 2:00pm (local time Palikir, Pohnpei, Submission of Federated States of Micronesia) Bids: 1. The Government of the Federated States of Micronesia has received financing from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) toward the cost of the FSM Renewable Energy Development Project (FSMREDP). Part of this financing will be used for payments under the contracts named above. Bidding is open to prequalified Bidders from eligible source countries of ADB. 2. The Government of Federated States of Micronesia - Department of Resources and Development (“the Employer”) invites sealed bids from prequalified eligible Bidders for the construction and completion of: Lot 1 Island of Yap. To supply and install an 800 kW / 800 kWh BESS at the Yap State Public Service Corporation power station, to supply and install 300 kW rooftop solar PV at the sports centre, and at least 1.6 MW of ground mounted solar PV connected to the Yap main grid near to the power station (but not including system integration work to be done by others). Lot 2 Island of Kosrae. To supply and install at least 1.0 MW of ground mounted and rooftop solar PV connected to the Kosrae main grid.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Instructions for The
    FIELD INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE INVENTORY OF THE PACIFIC ISLANDS 2013 Hawaii Edition Forest Inventory and Analysis Program Pacific Northwest Research Station USDA Forest Service THIS MANUAL IS BASED ON: FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS NATIONAL CORE FIELD GUIDE FIELD DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR PHASE 2 PLOTS VERSION 5.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSES OF THIS MANUAL ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 ORGANIZATION OF THIS MANUAL .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 UNITS OF MEASURE ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2.3 PLOT SETUP .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2.4 PLOT INTEGRITY ......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (SPREP) Compile and Review Invasive Alien Species Infor
    Report for the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) Compile and Review Invasive Alien Species Information for the Federated States of Micronesia and its constituent states Chuuk, Kosrae, Pohnpei and Yap March 2015 Shyama Pagad Biodiversity Data Management Ltd. Programme Officer, IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group 1 Table of Contents Glossary and Definitions ....................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Key Information Sources ....................................................................................................................... 6 SECTION 1 .............................................................................................................................................. 8 Alien and Invasive Species in FSM and constituent States of Chuuk, Kosrae, Pohnpei and Yap ...... 8 Results of information review .............................................................................................................. 8 SECTION 2 ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Pathways of introduction and spread of invasive alien species ....................................................... 10 SECTION 3 ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]