DOCSLIB.ORG

Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 version 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and DD MM YY Environment (DPIPWE) GPO Box 44 HOBART, Tasmania 7001 Australia Designation date Site Reference Number +61 3 6165 4396 [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: August 2011 3. Country: Australia 4. Name of the Ramsar site: The precise name of the designated site in one of the three official languages (English, French or Spanish) of the Convention. Alternative names, including in local language(s), should be given in parentheses after the precise name. Jocks Lagoon 5. Designation of new Ramsar site or update of existing site: This RIS is for (tick one box only): a) Designation of a new Ramsar site ; or b) Updated information on an existing Ramsar site 6. For RIS updates only, changes to the site since its designation or earlier update: a) Site boundary and area The Ramsar site boundary and site area are unchanged: or If the site boundary has changed: i) the boundary has been delineated more accurately ; or ii) the boundary has been extended ; or iii) the boundary has been restricted** and/or If the site area has changed: i) the area has been measured more accurately ; or ii) the area has been extended ; or iii) the area has been reduced** ** Important note: If the boundary and/or area of the designated site is being restricted/reduced, the Contracting Party should have followed the procedures established by the Conference of the Parties in the Annex to COP9 Resolution IX.6 and provided a report in line with paragraph 28 of that Annex, prior to the submission of an updated RIS. Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 2 In 2001, the boundary of the Jocks Lagoon Ramsar site was mapped more accurately and the area was been recalculated from 18.1ha to 18.58ha. The boundary of the site remains the same. b) Describe briefly any major changes to the ecological character of the Ramsar site, including in the application of the Criteria, since the previous RIS for the site: The previous RIS described the site as meeting Ramsar Criterion 4. This was based on the presence of the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum playfairi at the site (Croome and Tyler 1987). The genus Prorocentrum was previously thought to be entirely marine and is therefore of scientific interest. Jocks Lagoon is one of only seven known sites where this species exists. However, the presence of this species at the site is not evidence of providing support for the species at a critical stage, or for providing refuge in adverse conditions. Rather, it provides further justification for the site meeting criterion three – supporting populations important for regional biodiversity. Therefore, the site is not considered to meet this criterion currently or at the time of listing. Additions to the justification of listing criteria since the time of listing include: • two Ramsar habitat types that had not previously been recorded at the site [Ts (intermittent sedgeland marsh) and U (peat sedgeland and teatree)] • three more rare wetland dependent plant species: slender twigsedge (Baumea gunnii); zigzag bogsedge (Schoenus brevifolius); and yellow onion orchid (Microtidium atratum). 7. Map of site: Refer to Annex III of the Explanatory Note and Guidelines, for detailed guidance on provision of suitable maps, including digital maps. a) A map of the site, with clearly delineated boundaries, is included as: i) a hard copy (required for inclusion of site in the Ramsar List): ; ii) an electronic format (e.g. a JPEG or ArcView image) (Figure 1); iii) a GIS file providing geo-referenced site boundary vectors and attribute tables . b) Describe briefly the type of boundary delineation applied: e.g. the boundary is the same as an existing protected area (nature reserve, national park, etc.), or follows a catchment boundary, or follows a geopolitical boundary such as a local government jurisdiction, follows physical boundaries such as roads, follows the shoreline of a waterbody, etc. The boundary of Jocks Lagoon Ramsar site includes all of Lot 1 on Central Plan Register (CPR) 5655 from the Tasmanian Information and Land Services, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment (Figure 2). CPR 5655 horizontal datum is Australian Geodetic Datum (AGD66) Universal Transverse Mercator Projection Australian Map Grid (UTM AMG66) and Australian Height Datum (Tasmania) for vertical datum. 8. Geographical coordinates (latitude/longitude, in degrees and minutes): Provide the coordinates of the approximate centre of the site and/or the limits of the site. If the site is composed of more than one separate area, provide coordinates for each of these areas. Latitude: 41 degrees 20' 41.9" South; Longitude: 148 degrees 18' 29.4" East 9. General location: Include in which part of the country and which large administrative region(s) the site lies and the location of the nearest large town. Jocks Lagoon Ramsar Site is situated on the north-east coast of Tasmania, approximately 5 km south-east of the township of St Helens. It lies on the eastern side of a narrow strip of land that extends out to St Helens Point (Figure 2). It lies between parallel dunes and is 200 to 300 metres inland (westward) of the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 3 east coast of Tasmania. The Site is in the Break O’Day municipality, which has a population 6,000 residents (Break O’Day Council, 2009). 10. Elevation: (in metres: average and/or maximum & minimum) The whole area is less than 20 m ASL 11. Area: (in hectares) 18.58 hectares 12. General overview of the site: Provide a short paragraph giving a summary description of the principal ecological characteristics and importance of the wetland. Jocks Lagoon is a small, dystrophic freshwater lagoon, lying primarily on privately owned land and partly in the St Helens Conservation Area (Figure 3). It is one of a chain of lagoons, swamps and wetlands occurring along St Helens providing a freshwater resource in an otherwise dry coastal area. Jocks Lagoon was considered to have the highest wetland values in the area. The Lagoon is a high quality representative example of this type of wetland in the region. Access to the site is possible by 2-wheel drive vehicle or on foot. It is approximately 150 metres wide and 650 metres long, with a north-south orientation. It receives water from a small inlet stream with a catchment approximately three kilometres wide and one kilometre long and also from local groundwater. Although dark from tannins the waters of the lagoon are clear, low nutrient and acidic. The northern half of Jocks Lagoon is mostly a large area of open water with isolated patches of emergent rush and sedge. In contrast, much of the southern half of the lagoon is covered with rush and sedge emerging from the water surface. The water level of the lagoon fluctuates with rainfall and reaches a depth of two to three metres. The aquatic flora of the lagoon is diverse and includes several rare species (Section 2.4). 13. Ramsar Criteria: Tick the box under each Criterion applied to the designation of the Ramsar site. See Annex II of the Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for the Criteria and guidelines for their application (adopted by Resolution VII.11). All Criteria which apply should be ticked. 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 8 • 9 14. Justification for the application of each Criterion listed in 13 above: Provide justification for each Criterion in turn, clearly identifying to which Criterion the justification applies (see Annex II for guidance on acceptable forms of justification). Criterion 1: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it contains a representative, rare, or unique example of a natural or near-natural wetland type found within the appropriate biogeographic region. – Jocks Lagoon is a high quality representative of a wetland with Ramsar wetland types K (coastal freshwater lagoons), E (saline water shores), Ts (freshwater lakes and pools <8ha) and U (non-forested freshwater marshes on peat soils) within the Tasmanian Drainage Division. The site is in near natural condition, with minimal disturbance. There is dense vegetation cover within the site and its surrounds, minimising erosion of the site, which is considered to be in good geomorphic condition (Dunn 2005). Criterion 3: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it supports populations of plant and/or animal species important for maintaining the biological diversity of a particular biogeographic region.Jocks Lagoon supports rare, poorly reserved and scientifically valuable species. It provides wetland habitat for five threatened flora species considered to be at risk in Tasmania. These are: Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 4 Jointed twigsedge (Baumea articulata, rare, Tasmanian TSP ACT 1995). Jocks Lagoon is one of the few wetlands in Tasmania containing the jointed twigsedge and is considered a key site for the species (DPIW 2009). In Tasmania, jointed twigsedge is associated with rivers on the north-east coast (DPIW 2009); Slender twigsedge (Baumea gunnii, rare, Tasmanian TSP ACT 1995). In Tasmania, slender twigsedge inhabits wet moors, creeks and riverbanks (DPIW 2009) but was not previously known at the site until it was found in a botanical survey undertaken by Micah Visoiu (DPIPWE botanist) concurrently with a site visit for the 2011 ECD; Zigzag bogsedge (Schoenus brevifolius, rare, Tasmanian TSP ACT 1995). This species is only shown as occurring in six localities on the Tasmanian rare species database (DPIW 2009). The species was not previously known at the site but was found as part of the botanical survey undertaken by Micah Visoiu (DPIPWE botanist) concurrently with a site visit for the 2011 ECD.
Recommended publications
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance

    Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance

    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
  • Conospermum Hookeri Hookeri (Tasmanian Smokebush)

    Conospermum Hookeri Hookeri (Tasmanian Smokebush)

    Listing Statement for Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian smokebush) Conospermum hookeri tasmanian smokebush FAMILY: Proteaceae T A S M A N I A N T H R E A T E N E D S P E C I E S L I S T I N G S T A T E M E N T GROUP: Dicotyledon Photos: Naomi Lawrence Scientific name: Conospermum hookeri (Meisn.) E.M.Benn., Fl. Australia 16: 485 (1995) (Meisn.) Common name: tasmanian smokebush Name history: previously known in Tasmania as Conospermum taxifolium. Group: vascular plant, dicotyledon, family Proteaceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: vulnerable Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Vulnerable Distribution: Biogeographic origin: endemic to Tasmania Tasmanian NRM regions: North, South Tasmanian IBRA Bioregions (V6): South East, Northern Midlands, Ben Lomond, Flinders Figure 1. Distribution of Conospermum hookeri Plate 1. Conospermum hookeri in flower. showing IBRA (V6) bioregions 1 Threatened Species Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian smokebush) Conospermum hookeri may be limited by low seed SUMMARY: Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian production rates. Other species of Conospermum smokebush) is a small shrub in the Proteaceae are known to have low reproductive outputs. family. It is endemic to Tasmania, occurring Approximately 50% of flowers of Conospermum along the East Coast from Bruny Island to species form fruit though only a small Cape Barren Island in 10 locations, two proportion of these produce viable seed presumed locally extinct and another of (Morrison et al. 1994). uncertain status. The number of subpopulations is estimated to be 40, with five Conospermum hookeri makes a highly significant presumed locally extinct or of uncertain status.
  • Caring for Our Country Achievements

    Caring for Our Country Achievements

    caring for our country Achievements Report COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS AND CRITICAL AQUATIC HABITATS 2008 –2013 Coastwest, community seagrass monitoring project, Roebuck Bay, Broome, Western Australia. Source: Environs Kimberley Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats Fragile ecosystems are being protected and rehabilitated by improving water quality, protecting Ramsar wetlands and delivering the Great Barrier Reef Rescue package. Coastwest, community seagrass monitoring project, Roebuck Bay, Broome, Western Australia. Source: Environs Kimberley 3 Table of contents Introduction 6 Reef Rescue outcomes 9 Outcome 1 Reduce the discharge of dissolved nutrients and chemicals from agricultural lands to the Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 25 per cent. 9 Outcome 2 Reduce the discharge of sediments and nutrients from agricultural lands to the Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 10 per cent 9 Case study: Minimal soil disturbance in cane farming—Tully/Murray catchment, Queensland 10 Case study: Repairing bank erosion in the Upper Johnstone catchment, Queensland 12 Case study: Sugar cane partnerships, Mackay Whitsunday region, Queensland 13 Case study: Horticulturalists nurturing the reef, Mackay Whitsunday region, Queensland 14 Case study: Land and Sea Country Indigenous Partnerships Program, Queensland 15 Outcome 3.1 Deliver actions that sustain the environmental values of priority sites in the Ramsar estate, particularly sites in northern and remote Australia. 17 Case study: Currawinya Lakes Ramsar wetland, Queensland 18 Case study: Macquarie Marshes Ramsar wetland, New South Wales 22 Case study: Interlaken Ramsar wetland, Tasmania 23 Case study: Peel–Yalgorup System Ramsar wetland, Western Australia 25 Outcome 3.2 Deliver actions that sustain the environmental values of an additional 25 per cent of (non-Ramsar) priority coastal and inland high conservation value aquatic ecosystems [now known as high ecological value aquatic ecosystems] including, as a priority, sites in the Murray–Darling Basin.
  • Extent and Impacts of Dryland Salinity in Tasmania

    Extent and Impacts of Dryland Salinity in Tasmania

    National Land and Water Resources Audit Extent and impacts of Dryland Salinity in Tasmania Project 1A VOLUME 2 - APPENDICES C.H. Bastick and M.G. Walker Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment August 2000 DEPARTMENT of PRIMARY INDUSTRIES, WATER and ENVIRONMENT LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1 LAND SYSTEMS IN TASMANIA CONTAINING AREAS OF SALINITY................................................................1 Appendix 2 EXTENT, TRENDS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF DRYLAND SALINITY IN TASMANIA...................................16 Appendix 3 GROUND WATER ....................................................................28 Appendix 4(a) SURFACE WATER MONITORING .......................................32 Appendix 4(b) SURFACE WATER IN TASMANIA - An Overview ..............36 Appendix 5 POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF SALINITY ON BIODIVERSITY VALUES IN TASMANIA.............................46 Appendix 1 LAND SYSTEMS IN TASMANIA CONTAINING AREAS OF SALINITY 1 LAND SYSTEMS IN TASMANIA CONTAINING AREAS OF SALINITY · The Soil Conservation section of the Tasmanian Department of Agriculture between 1980 and 1989 carried out a series of reconnaissance surveys of the State's land resources. · It was intended that the data collected would allow a more rational approach to Tasmania's soil conservation problems and serve as a base for further studies, such as the detailed mapping of land resources in selected areas and the sampling of soils for physical and chemical analyses. It was therefore decided that this would be a logical framework on which to develop the Dryland Salinity Audit process. · Land resources result from the interaction of geology, climate, topography, soils and vegetation · Areas where these are considered to be relatively uniform for broad scale uses are classified as land components. Land components are grouped into larger entities called land systems, which are the mapping units used for this Audit.
  • Atlas of Coastal Saltmarsh Wetlands in Northern

    Atlas of Coastal Saltmarsh Wetlands in Northern

    ATLAS OF COASTAL SALTMARSH WETLANDS IN NORTHERN TASMANIA Maps, photos and text: Vishnu Prahalad Design and layout: Michael Helman Published by NRM North, August 2014 NRM NORTH INTRODUCTION TO THE ATLAS Coastal saltmarshes in subtropical and temperate Australia (including Tasmania) were listed in 2013 as a vulnerable ecological community under Federal environment legislation (Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999). Tis listing acknowledges that wetlands have sufered habitat fragmentation and loss of community integrity coupled with threats from human activities, invasive species and sea level rise. In Tasmania, studies show that close to half of these important coastal ecosystems have been lost due to these threats. Te vulnerability of Tasmanian saltmarshes is further underscored by a lack of broad awareness of the important values provided by these habitats. Saltmarsh wetlands perform important ecological functions that support a range of ecosystem services and biodiversity values in the coastal landscape, though they remain underappreciated and in many cases, lack baseline mapping information. Particularly in Northern Tasmania, saltmarsh wetlands were unmapped in several areas including the Tamar Estuary. Mapping these wetlands is, therefore, an important activity and also needs to be accompanied by products aimed at both communicating the mapping results and providing tools for better understanding and engagement in conserving these habitats and their ecological services. Tis atlas provides a visual summary of mapping undertaken as part of the Steps to Saltmarsh Conservation in Northern Tasmania project (completed in July 2014). Information is drawn from the GIS mapping layer that records the extent and location of saltmarshes and the accompanying database that contains information on a range of attributes pertaining to these mapped natural assets.
  • King Island News for 8 Days Over Easter This Year

    King Island News for 8 Days Over Easter This Year

    YELLOW THROAT The newsletter of BirdLife Tasmania a branch of BirdLife Australia Number 69, May 2013 Bob Brown at General Meeting Greg Irons to speak in July Life Sciences Building, University of Greg became the director of the Bonorong Wildlife Tasmania, Thursday, 9 May, 8.00 p.m. Sanctuary at just 25 years of age, and has so far enlisted more than 800 volunteers. The rescue service runs 24 Dr Bob Brown, founder and former leader of the Greens hours a day, seven days a week, and in the last 12 months Party, former senator for Tasmania, and current director of has taken over 5000 calls. As a private sanctuary that cares the Australian chapter of Sea Shepherd, will be the speaker for orphaned and injured wildlife, Bonorong depends on at the May General Meeting. Dr Brown will be speaking donations and visitor entries. about the impact that birds have had in his life. Greg is also a familiar face in the children’s ward of the Royal Hobart Hospital, visiting with baby wombats and Meeting venue: Life Sciences Lecture Theatre 1, Life blue-tongue lizards to brighten sick children’s days and Sciences Building, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay. help spread his conservation message. Greg’s deep under- Access and parking are from College Road or from the standing of Tasmania’s wildlife, and his passion for parking area outside the University Centre via the conservation values, is helping preserve the state’s pedestrian bridge over Churchill Avenue. precious environment. Bonorong Wildlife Sanctuary BYO Barbecue for BirdLife Tasmania, 18 May Bonorong Wildlife Sanctuary is hosting a BYO barbecue for BirdLife Tasmania members on Saturday 18 May at 5.00 p.m.
  • Little Waterhouse Lake Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description

    Little Waterhouse Lake Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description

    Little Waterhouse Lake Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description Final 2 March 2012 Blank Page Little Waterhouse Lake Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description by LE Project No: LE0907b 2 March 2012 Little Waterhouse Lake Ramsar Site ECD…4 Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 7 ECD DISCLAIMER ................................................................................................................................................. 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 9 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 24 1.1. PURPOSE ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 1.2. SITE DETAILS ............................................................................................................................................. 25 1.3. DATE OF DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................. 27 1.4. RELEVANT TREATIES, LEGISLATION OR REGULATIONS
  • Bioassessment of Freshwater Lentic Wetlands Using the Reference Condition Approach

    Bioassessment of Freshwater Lentic Wetlands Using the Reference Condition Approach

    Bioassessment of freshwater lentic wetlands using the reference condition approach Toni Furlonge August 2016 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Science Institute for Applied Ecology University of Canberra Copyright notice © The author (2016). Except as provided in the Copyright Act 1968, this thesis may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the author. I certify that I have made all reasonable efforts to secure copyright permissions for third-party content included in this thesis and have not knowingly added copyright content to my work without the owner's permission ii Statement of contribution The thesis entitled Bioassessment of freshwater lentic wetlands using the reference condition approachincludes a published paper (Chapter 4) and one manuscript prepared for publication (Chapter 5), which were written under the supervision of Dr. Fiona Dyer and Prof. Jenny Davis (Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra). These people provided guidance throughout the writing and comments on manuscript drafts. I have not received other assistance than stated above. As chair of the supervisory panel I agree with the above statement. ......................................................................... Dr. Fiona Dyer Date: 09 / 03 / 201 v Acknowledgements My first and foremost gratitude is to my supervisors Dr Fiona Dyer and Professor Jenny Davis. Thank you for your guidance,andencouragement to continue writing when I felt isolated. Thank you for being patient when you had to explain the same thing to me more than once. I thank TreforReynoldson and Professor Peter Davies for being available to discuss my questions, and Richard Norris in spirit for our initial research discussions.
  • Appendix 7-2 Protected Matters Search Tool (PMST) Report for the Risk EMBA

    Appendix 7-2 Protected Matters Search Tool (PMST) Report for the Risk EMBA

    Environment plan Appendix 7-2 Protected matters search tool (PMST) report for the Risk EMBA Stromlo-1 exploration drilling program Equinor Australia B.V. Level 15 123 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Australia February 2019 www.equinor.com.au EPBC Act Protected Matters Report This report provides general guidance on matters of national environmental significance and other matters protected by the EPBC Act in the area you have selected. Information on the coverage of this report and qualifications on data supporting this report are contained in the caveat at the end of the report. Information is available about Environment Assessments and the EPBC Act including significance guidelines, forms and application process details. Report created: 13/09/18 14:02:20 Summary Details Matters of NES Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act Extra Information Caveat Acknowledgements This map may contain data which are ©Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia), ©PSMA 2010 Coordinates Buffer: 1.0Km Summary Matters of National Environmental Significance This part of the report summarises the matters of national environmental significance that may occur in, or may relate to, the area you nominated. Further information is available in the detail part of the report, which can be accessed by scrolling or following the links below. If you are proposing to undertake an activity that may have a significant impact on one or more matters of national environmental significance then you should consider the Administrative Guidelines on Significance. World Heritage Properties: 11 National Heritage Places: 13 Wetlands of International Importance: 13 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: None Commonwealth Marine Area: 2 Listed Threatened Ecological Communities: 14 Listed Threatened Species: 311 Listed Migratory Species: 97 Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act This part of the report summarises other matters protected under the Act that may relate to the area you nominated.
  • Ramsar National Report to COP13

    Ramsar National Report to COP13

    Ramsar National Report to COP13 Section 1: Institutional Information Important note: the responses below will be considered by the Ramsar Secretariat as the definitive list of your focal points, and will be used to update the information it holds. The Secretariat’s current information about your focal points is available at http://www.ramsar.org/search-contact. Name of Contracting Party The completed National Report must be accompanied by a letter in the name of the Head of Administrative Authority, confirming that this is the Contracting Party’s official submission of its COP13 National Report. It can be attached to this question using the "Manage documents" function (blue symbol below) › Australia You have attached the following documents to this answer. Ramsar_National_Report-Australia-letter_re_submission-signed-Jan_2018.docx.pdf - Letter from Head of Australia's Ramsar Administrative Authority Designated Ramsar Administrative Authority Name of Administrative Authority › Commonwealth Environmental Water Office Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy Head of Administrative Authority - name and title › Mr Mark TaylorAssistant Secretary, Wetlands, Policy and Northern Water UseCommonwealth Environmental Water Office Mailing address › GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Telephone/Fax › +61 2 6274 1904 Email › [email protected] Designated National Focal Point for Ramsar Convention Matters Name and title › Ms Leanne WilkinsonAssistant Director, Wetlands Section Mailing address › Wetlands, Policy and
  • THE TASMANIAN FRESHWATER PROJECT Freshwater Condition

    THE TASMANIAN FRESHWATER PROJECT Freshwater Condition

    THE TASMANIAN FRESHWATER PROJECT Freshwater Condition An initiative of the Tasmanian Independent Science Council Prepared by Christine Coughanowr August 2021 1 ABOUT THE TASMANIAN FRESHWATER PROJECT What’s happening with freshwater in Tasmania? What is the condition of our rivers, lakes, wetlands and estuaries? Are our water supplies clean, plentiful and well-managed? Who is minding the store and doing the maths? What are risks of getting it wrong? Tasmania prides itself on having a clean, green image, underpinned by a perception of abundant and pristine freshwater resources. A closer look suggests that many of our rivers are already under significant stress and are likely to become further damaged as climate change progresses. Added to this is the increasing demand for further extractions to support ambitious irrigation, hydropower, aquaculture, mining and other developments. Can our freshwater systems sustain this potential rate of extraction? In short - we don’t know, in part due to a lack of robust monitoring, delayed reporting, limited metering of water use, and a tendency to set ambitious growth targets without first doing the maths. Finally, current water policies and regulations do not clearly underpin sustainable use, and pricing arrangements send conflicting signals. The Tasmanian Freshwater Project is an initiative of the Tasmanian Independent Science Council. Its purpose is to provide an overview of this resource based on reports, publications and other information sources that are currently available. The Project also identifies major gaps in our understanding, raises key issues and recommends a number of actions to better conserve our freshwater systems and support sustainable use. The Tasmanian Freshwater Project is envisaged as four main review papers: • Freshwater condition • Freshwater use • Freshwater policy, planning and regulation • Freshwater economics This paper is the first to be published.
  • Lavinia Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description

    Lavinia Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description

    Lavinia Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description March 2012 Blank Page Client/Logo Lavinia Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description by Final March 2012 ECD for Lavinia Ramsar Site…4 Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTORY NOTES ................................................................................................................................... 8 DISCLAIMER ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 9 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 33 1.1 PURPOSE OF AN ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 33 1.2 SITE DETAILS ............................................................................................................................................. 34 1.3 DATE OF DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................. 37 1.4 RELEVANT TREATIES, LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS .......................................................................