DOCSLIB.ORG

Lance Lloyd, Lloyd Environmental Pty Ltd Date: 27Th May 2018 Title: Review of EES for the Level Crossing Near Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lance Lloyd, Lloyd Environmental Pty Ltd Date: 27Th May 2018 Title: Review of EES for the Level Crossing Near Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands Review of EES for the Level Crossings near Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands ..1 To: Andrew Sherman, Russell Kennedy Lawyers From: Lance Lloyd, Lloyd Environmental Pty Ltd Date: 27th May 2018 Title: Review of EES for the Level Crossing near Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands Reviewers Details: Lancelot Neil Lloyd, BSc, MSc. Master of Science, University of Adelaide, 1987 Bachelor of Science, University of Adelaide, 1981 Lloyd Environmental Pty Ltd PO Box 348, Somers, Victoria, 3927 Australian Society of Fish Biology (Member, 1981 to present) Australian Institute of Biology (Member since 1989; President, 2005 to 2016) Australian Freshwater Sciences Society (Life Member, 1981 to present) River Basin Management Society (Member, 1990 to present [Honorary Life Member since 2015]; President, 1999-2002) Lloyd Environmental Pty Ltd is a specialist consulting practice providing quality services to water and environment sectors in Australia. The company was established in 1998 and is led by Lance Lloyd, BSc, MSc, who has 30 years’ experience and provides: o a detailed knowledge of and experience in the Ramsar Convention Obligations and the National and State responsibilities relating to Ramsar sites; o vast experience in wetland management and planning (and specifically of Ramsar wetlands); o high level knowledge of the majority of South Australian, Victorian and Tasmanian Ramsar sites; o substantial expertise and experience in ecosystem restoration and rehabilitation; and o high level and strategic analytical skills, including community and landholder consultation. Lance has been an innovator in the Ramsar process, having been appointed by the Department of the Environment (then SEWPaC) to a panel for ‘The Development and Technical Review of Ramsar Wetland Documentation’, working closely with the Department to update and refine the Guidelines for the preparation of Ecological Character Descriptions (ECD), preparation of ECDs and Ramsar Information Sheets (RIS), and reviewing multiple ECDs, RISs and Ramsar Management Plans. Lance has undertaken ecological or environmental studies at each of Victoria’s Ramsar sites over the last 24 years. He has published in an international scientific journal on the Ramsar process in recent years. He has undertaken EPBC Act assessments for the Dept of Environment and Energy (Commonwealth Govt) at Ramsar and other wetlands to assess possible impacts on Ramsar and EPBC values. He is currently completing a Ramsar Management Plan for Cape Barren Island in Tasmania. Further details are found in the attached curriculum vitae. Review of EES for the Level Crossings near Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands ..2 Scope: Russell Kennedy Lawyers have retained my services, on behalf of Kingston City Council in order to: o provide an expert opinion in relation to the Edithvale and Bonbeach Level Crossing Removal Project Environmental Effects Statement ("EES") and to appear to give expert evidence at Planning Panels Victoria ("PPV"). o provide expert advice on the potential impacts of the level crossing removal at Edithvale and Bonbeach stations on the Ramsar Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands ("Wetlands"). o assess any implications under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth of Australia) with respect to any potential cumulative impact on the Wetlands, listed threatened species and migratory species, as well as any impact on Matters of National Environmental Significance under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Therefore my comments and assessments only relate to the wetland and Ramsar values of the Ramsar listed Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands ("Wetlands") and not any other sites affected by the works. Background and Methods: In undertaking this review, I have read all the relevant documents within the Edithvale and Bonbeach Level Crossing Removal Projects Environment Effects Statement (EES) and Technical documents necessary to assess what impacts the works may have upon wetland ecosystems, ecological character and Ramsar status of the Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands. I have reviewed the Ramsar documentation for the Site to understand these values fully and conducted a site visit in mid-May 2018 to gain a first-hand knowledge of the site and confirm my understanding from the literature already undertaken. In particular, I have focussed upon the sections of the EES, which are particularly relevant to my advice: EES Chapter 2: RATIONALE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS EES Chapter 3: KEY FINDINGS EES Chapter 5: MODELLING THE WATER ENVIRONMENT EES Chapter 6: EDITHVALE-SEAFORD WETLANDS AND GROUNDWATER DEPENDENT ECOSYSTEMS EES Chapter 9: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK EES Chapter 10 SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EES TECHNICAL REPORT A Groundwater Impact Assessment, LXRA-LX31-00-GE-EES- 0001 Revision: 1. February 2018 EES TECHNICAL REPORT B: Ecological Impact Assessment: Wetlands and Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems. LXRA-LX31-00-PA-EES-0006 Revision:0. February 2018 EES TECHNICAL REPORT D Ecological Impact Assessment: Project Areas. LXRA-LX31- 00-PA-EES-0001 Revision: 0. February 2018 EES TECHNICAL REPORT E Surface Water Impact Assessment (LXRA-LX31-00-HW-EES- 0001) EES Attachment II. Environmental Risk Report. LXRA-LX31-00-PA-EES-0011 Revision: 0. February 2018 EES Attachment III: Matters of National Environmental Significance Review of EES for the Level Crossings near Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands ..3 Also additional reports such as the Ramsar Site ECD addendum and the Ramsar Site Management Plan were reviewed to ensure these documents were considered by the EES and additional information on the sites were understood: Hale, J. and Butcher, R. (2017) Addendum to Ecological Character Description for the Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands Ramsar Site. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning. East Melbourne. Quinn, D., Sutton, F., Hale, J., and McMahon, A. (2016). Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands Ramsar Site Management Plan. Melbourne Water, Melbourne, Victoria. Site Details: The area under consideration of this review is the Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands Ramsar Site, which is located southeast of the Melbourne bounded suburbs of Edithvale, Chelsea Heights and Aspendale Gardens. The Ramsar Site consists of two separate wetlands: Edithvale (104 ha) and Seaford (158 ha) which are both predominantly owned by Melbourne Water with some sections of Seaford Wetlands being owned by the City of Frankston (Quinn et al. 2016). The Ramsar Site, being in an urban setting, has been altered and impacted by historical disturbance of water regime, water quality and vegetation, which has resulted in a modified ecological condition (Quinn et al. 2016). Despite this, ecological values are still significant, although the ecosystem components are in a constant state of flux, primarily responding to water levels and salinity (Quinn et al. 2016). The Ecological Vegetation Classes (EVCs) present at the Wetlands are: o Damp Sands Herb-rich Woodland (EVC 3); o Swamp Scrub (EVC 53); o Tall Marsh (EVC 821); o Brackish Aggregate Wetland (EVC 656); o Brackish Aquatic Herbland (EVC 537); o Plains Sedgy Wetland (EVC 647); o Aquatic Herbland (EVC 653); o Brackish Herbland (EVC 538); and o Wet Saltmarsh (EVC 9). There are four Ramsar wetland types within the Wetlands. In order of dominance, these are: Ts - Seasonal / intermittent freshwater marshes/pools on inorganic soils; Ss - Seasonal/intermittent saline/brackish/alkaline marshes/pools; Xf - Freshwater, tree-dominated wetlands; P - Seasonal/ intermittent freshwater lakes (Quinn et al. 2016). Review of EES for the Level Crossings near Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands ..4 In Ramsar Sites, the major value of the site, and the triggers for EPBC Act referrals, are determined by the ecological character of the Site and this is defined by the listing criteria and the Critical Components, Processes and Services (CPS) identified for the Site. Hale and Butcher (2017) updated the Ecological Character Description with the CPS and the Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) for the Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands Ramsar Site, which are now used to assess any changes to ecological character at all Ramsar Sites (Table 1). Table 1. The Critical Components, Processes and Services (CPS) and Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) for the Edithvale-Seaford Wetlands Ramsar Site (these were all meet in 2016; Hale and Butcher 2017). Critical CPS Limit of Acceptable Change Physical habitat for Wetland habitat that comprises open water, emergent native waterbirds vegetation (sedges, rushes and reeds) and exposed mudflats. Waterbird diversity Abundance of waterbirds will not decline below the following and abundance (calculated as a rolling five-year average of maximum annual count): o Total waterbirds – 2500 o Migratory waders – 900 o Australasian waders - 125 o Ducks - 650 o Fishers - 200 o Large wading birds - 100 o Herbivores – 450 Abundance of sharp-tailed sandpiper will not decline below 0.5% of the population as stated in the most recent Wetlands International population estimate (based on a five-year rolling average of annual maximum counts). Waterbird breeding Breeding of the following species at least once every five years: o Black swan o Blue-billed duck o Chestnut teal o Dusky moorhen o Purple swamphen o Swamp harrier Threatened species: Presence of Australasian bittern in at least three out of every five birds years. Presence of curlew sandpiper in at least one out of every five years. 2 This represents 3.9% of the 2016 population estimate of Hansen et al. (2016). Discussion: The following discussion examines
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Conospermum Hookeri Hookeri (Tasmanian Smokebush)
    Listing Statement for Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian smokebush) Conospermum hookeri tasmanian smokebush FAMILY: Proteaceae T A S M A N I A N T H R E A T E N E D S P E C I E S L I S T I N G S T A T E M E N T GROUP: Dicotyledon Photos: Naomi Lawrence Scientific name: Conospermum hookeri (Meisn.) E.M.Benn., Fl. Australia 16: 485 (1995) (Meisn.) Common name: tasmanian smokebush Name history: previously known in Tasmania as Conospermum taxifolium. Group: vascular plant, dicotyledon, family Proteaceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: vulnerable Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Vulnerable Distribution: Biogeographic origin: endemic to Tasmania Tasmanian NRM regions: North, South Tasmanian IBRA Bioregions (V6): South East, Northern Midlands, Ben Lomond, Flinders Figure 1. Distribution of Conospermum hookeri Plate 1. Conospermum hookeri in flower. showing IBRA (V6) bioregions 1 Threatened Species Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian smokebush) Conospermum hookeri may be limited by low seed SUMMARY: Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian production rates. Other species of Conospermum smokebush) is a small shrub in the Proteaceae are known to have low reproductive outputs. family. It is endemic to Tasmania, occurring Approximately 50% of flowers of Conospermum along the East Coast from Bruny Island to species form fruit though only a small Cape Barren Island in 10 locations, two proportion of these produce viable seed presumed locally extinct and another of (Morrison et al. 1994). uncertain status. The number of subpopulations is estimated to be 40, with five Conospermum hookeri makes a highly significant presumed locally extinct or of uncertain status.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 Version
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 14, 3rd edition). A 4th edition of the Handbook is in preparation and will be available in 2009. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM Y Y Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE) GPO Box 44 HOBART Tasmania 7001 Designation date Site Reference Number Australia Ph: +61 3 6233 8011 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: July 2012 3. Country: Australia 4. Name of the Ramsar site: The precise name of the designated site in one of the three official languages (English, French or Spanish) of the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Character Description for Roebuck Bay
    ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DESCRIPTION FOR ROEBUCK BAY Wetland Research & Management ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DESCRIPTION FOR ROEBUCK BAY Report prepared for the Department of Environment and Conservation by Bennelongia Pty Ltd 64 Jersey Street, Jolimont WA 6913 www.bennelongia.com.au In association with: DHI Water & Environment Pty Ltd 4A/Level 4, Council House 27-29 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 www.dhigroup.com.au Wetland Research & Management 28 William Street, Glen Forrest WA 6071 April 2009 Cover photographs: Roebuck Bay, © Jan Van de Kam, The Netherlands Introductory Notes This Ecological Character Description (ECD Publication) has been prepared in accordance with the National Framework and Guidance for Describing the Ecological Character of Australia’s Ramsar Wetlands (National Framework) (Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2008). The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) prohibits actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a Ramsar wetland unless the Commonwealth Environment Minister has approved the taking of the action, or some other provision in the EPBC Act allows the action to be taken. The information in this ECD Publication does not indicate any commitment to a particular course of action, policy position or decision. Further, it does not provide assessment of any particular action within the meaning of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), nor replace the role of the Minister or his delegate in making an informed decision to approve an action. This ECD Publication is provided without prejudice to any final decision by the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia on change in ecological character in accordance with the requirements of Article 3.2 of the Ramsar Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Notice to Mariners Is
    LOCAL NAVIGATION WARNING GIPPSLAND PORTS The following navigation warning is published for general information. AUSTRALIA - VICTORIA LNW NO.1 OF 2021 GIPPSLAND PORTS NAVIGATION ADVICE OCEAN ACCESS BAR CROSSINGS ARE DANGEROUS DATE: Tuesday 9th March 2021 PREVIOUS Local Navigation Warning No10 of 2018 is referred. NOTICE: DETAILS: A recent Marine Incident has occurred at McLoughlins Beach ocean access entrance highlighting the risks involved for vessel operators attempting to make passage through and across ocean entrance sand bars. Gippsland Ports is the Local Port Manager for 5 Local Ports; Each of the following ports is a recognised Bar Port. • Port of Corner Inlet and Port Albert • Port of Gippsland Lakes • Port of Anderson Inlet • Port of Snowy River (Marlo) • Port of Mallacoota Inlet. Only the Ports of Corner Inlet, Port Albert and the Gippsland Lakes (Lakes Entrance Bar) have recognised aids to navigation to guide the Mariner through and across their respective ocean entrance sand bars. The entrances to these ports remain open at all times, however sound local knowledge and favorable environmental conditions are required to make a safe passage. The Port of Snowy River (Marlo), Port of Mallacoota Inlet and Port of Anderson Inlet are dynamic in nature with ever changing channel configuration and depths. Ocean access can be closed off at Marlo and Mallacoota during times of drought. There are no aids to navigation to guide the mariner through and across their respective ocean entrance sand bars. Lake Tyers - Sydenham Inlet and Tamboon Inlet, all remain closed until sufficient back up of water creates an ocean access entrance.
    [Show full text]
  • Scooter News - 2016 Race Calendar
    SCOOTER NEWS - 2016 RACE CALENDAR This is a guide only - always check with the organisers before heading out! Date VIC MX/Off Road Club Events State/National Events Other Fun Stuff 1 19/09/2016 SCOOTER NEWS - 2016 RACE CALENDAR This is a guide only - always check with the organisers before heading out! Date VIC MX/Off Road Club Events State/National Events Other Fun Stuff 2 19/09/2016 SCOOTER NEWS - 2016 RACE CALENDAR This is a guide only - always check with the organisers before heading out! Date VIC MX/Off Road Club Events State/National Events Other Fun Stuff SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBER 1. 2016 Lucas Oils Logan Glass Australian Moto-Trials Champs, Stanthorpe QLD, 24-25th Sept 2. VERi Vinduro Blackwood, 25th Sept CANCELLED 3. Gippsland Cancer Charity Ride, 1. Traralgon MCC, Club Practice Day, Stockdale, 23-25th Sept 25th Sept 4. Honda Myrtleford Alpine Rally, 2. Portland MCC, Club Day, 25th Sept 24th Sept 3. Honda Myrtleford Alpine Rally, 24th 5. 2016 Yamaha Victorian ATV MX Sept 1. Aust Jnr MX Champs, Riverland State Champs, Castlemaine, 24- 24-25 4. Northwest MCC, Ride for Harry with SA, 24 Sept - 1 Oct 25th Sept Sat night band and spit roast, Ironman 2. Yamaha VORC Rnd 11, Sprints 6. Frankston MCC, 70th SEPT & Pony Express, 24th Sept (Seniors Only), Yarram MCC, 25th Anniversary Day, FRI 23rd Sept 5. Harley Club of Vic, MotoGC HCV Dirt Sept 7. Yamaha VORC Presentation Track Champs Round 1, Broadford, Night, Manningham Club, 30th Sept 25th Sept 8. MX School Holidays Coaching 6. Goulburn Valley MCC, Club Practice Clinic, Broadford (MV), 24th Sept Day, Mooroopna, 25th Sept CANCELLED 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Inshore Habitats Around Tasmania for Life History
    National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Entry Jordan, Alan Richard, 1964- Assessment of inshore habitats around Tasmania for life-history stages of commercial finfish species Bibliography ISBN 0 646 36875 3. 1. Marine fishes - Tasmania - Habitat. 2. Marine fishes - Tasmania - Development. I. Jordan, Alan, 1964 - . II. Tasmania Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute. 597.5609946 Published by the Marine Research Laboratories - Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania 1998 Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute Marine Research Laboratories Taroona, Tasmania 7053 Phone: (03) 6227 7277 Fax: (03) 62 27 8035 The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the Marine Research Laboratories or the Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute. ASSESSMENT OF INSHORE HABITATS AROUND TASMANIA FOR LIFE-HISTORY STAGES OF COMMERCIAL FINFISH SPECIES A.R. Jordan, D.M. Mills, G. Ewing and J.M. Lyle December 1998 FRDC Project No. 94/037 Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute Marine Research Laboratories Assessment of inshore habitats for finfish in Tasmania 94/037 Assessment of inshore habitats around Tasmania for life-history stages of commercial finfish species. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Dr A. R. Jordan and Dr J. M. Lyle ADDRESS: Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute Marine Research Laboratories Taroona, Tasmania 7053 Phone: (03) 62 277 277 Fax: (03) 62 278 035 Email: [email protected] OBJECTIVES: 1. To determine the abundance and distribution of commercial fish species associated with selected inshore soft-bottom habitats around Tasmania. 2. To categorise the habitat types in these areas and determine the size/age structure of commercial fish species by habitat as a means of assessing the critical habitat requirements of such species.
    [Show full text]
  • Numbers of Bar-Tailed Godwits (Limosa Lapponica Baueri) in New Zealand and Australia During the Austral Summer of 2019–2020
    643 Notornis, 2020, Vol. 67: 643-650 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand Inc. Numbers of bar-tailed godwits (Limosa lapponica baueri) in New Zealand and Australia during the austral summer of 2019–2020 ROB SCHUCKARD* PO Box 98, Rai Valley 7145, New Zealand DAVID S. MELVILLE 1261 Dovedale Road, RD2 Wakefield, Nelson 7096, New Zealand ADRIAN RIEGEN 231 Forest Hill Rd, Waiatarua, Auckland 0612, New Zealand PETER DRISCOLL PO Box 6227, Mooloolah Valley, Queensland 4053, Australia JORIS DRIESSEN BirdLife Australia, 2-05/60 Leicester St, Carlton Victoria 3053, Australia LINDALL R. KIDD BirdLife Australia, 2-05/60 Leicester St, Carlton Victoria 3053, Australia Abstract: Bar-tailed godwits (Limosa lapponica) were counted throughout New Zealand and on the east coast of Australia during the 2019–2020 austral summer, in the first attempt to assess the total population of the subspecies baueri on the southern hemisphere non-breeding grounds. Survey coverage in New Zealand was nationwide (158 sites surveyed); surveys in Australia covered 314 sites between Great Sandy Strait in southern Queensland, and the Gulf St Vincent in South Australia. Areas north of Great Sandy Strait were either partially counted or were not visited over this survey period. Partial surveys were excluded from the survey results. The total number of godwits counted was 116,446. If allowance is made for an additional ~10,000 birds expected to have been present in northern Queensland (based on previous surveys), the total population of baueri in New Zealand and Australia would have been about 126,000. The 2019 breeding season was very successful, with the highest recorded number of juvenile birds since 2011 and 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Caring for Our Country Achievements
    caring for our country Achievements Report COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS AND CRITICAL AQUATIC HABITATS 2008 –2013 Coastwest, community seagrass monitoring project, Roebuck Bay, Broome, Western Australia. Source: Environs Kimberley Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats Fragile ecosystems are being protected and rehabilitated by improving water quality, protecting Ramsar wetlands and delivering the Great Barrier Reef Rescue package. Coastwest, community seagrass monitoring project, Roebuck Bay, Broome, Western Australia. Source: Environs Kimberley 3 Table of contents Introduction 6 Reef Rescue outcomes 9 Outcome 1 Reduce the discharge of dissolved nutrients and chemicals from agricultural lands to the Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 25 per cent. 9 Outcome 2 Reduce the discharge of sediments and nutrients from agricultural lands to the Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 10 per cent 9 Case study: Minimal soil disturbance in cane farming—Tully/Murray catchment, Queensland 10 Case study: Repairing bank erosion in the Upper Johnstone catchment, Queensland 12 Case study: Sugar cane partnerships, Mackay Whitsunday region, Queensland 13 Case study: Horticulturalists nurturing the reef, Mackay Whitsunday region, Queensland 14 Case study: Land and Sea Country Indigenous Partnerships Program, Queensland 15 Outcome 3.1 Deliver actions that sustain the environmental values of priority sites in the Ramsar estate, particularly sites in northern and remote Australia. 17 Case study: Currawinya Lakes Ramsar wetland, Queensland 18 Case study: Macquarie Marshes Ramsar wetland, New South Wales 22 Case study: Interlaken Ramsar wetland, Tasmania 23 Case study: Peel–Yalgorup System Ramsar wetland, Western Australia 25 Outcome 3.2 Deliver actions that sustain the environmental values of an additional 25 per cent of (non-Ramsar) priority coastal and inland high conservation value aquatic ecosystems [now known as high ecological value aquatic ecosystems] including, as a priority, sites in the Murray–Darling Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Numbers of Piscivorous Birds in Western Port and West Corner Inlet, Victoria, 1987–2012 P
    Trends in Numbers of Piscivorous Birds in Western Port and West Corner Inlet, Victoria, 1987–2012 P. W. Menkhorst, R. H. Loyn, C. Liu, B. Hansen, M. Mackay and P. Dann February 2015 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Unpublished Client Report for Melbourne Water Trends in numbers of piscivorous birds in Western Port and West Corner Inlet, Victoria, 1987–2012 Peter W. Menkhorst 1, Richard H. Loyn 1,2 , Canran Liu 1, Birgita Hansen 1,3 , Moragh Mackay 4 and Peter Dann 5 1Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 2Current address: Eco Insights Pty Ltd 4 Roderick Close, Viewbank, Victoria 3084 3Current address: Collaborative Research Network, Federation University (Mt Helen) PO Box 663, Ballarat, Victoria 3353 4Riverbend Ecological Services 2620 Bass Highway, Bass, Victoria 3991 5Research Department, Phillip Island Nature Parks P0 Box 97, Cowes, Victoria 3991 February 2015 in partnership with Melbourne Water Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Heidelberg, Victoria Report produced by: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning PO Box 137 Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Phone (03) 9450 8600 Website: www.delwp.vic.gov.au Citation: Menkhorst, P.W., Loyn, R.H., Liu, C., Hansen, B., McKay, M. and Dann, P. (2015). Trends in numbers of piscivorous birds in Western Port and West Corner Inlet, Victoria, 1987–2012. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Unpublished Client Report for Melbourne Water. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Victoria. Front cover photo: Crested Terns feed on small fish such as Southern Anchovy Engraulis australis (Photo: Peter Menkhorst).
    [Show full text]
  • Extent and Impacts of Dryland Salinity in Tasmania
    National Land and Water Resources Audit Extent and impacts of Dryland Salinity in Tasmania Project 1A VOLUME 2 - APPENDICES C.H. Bastick and M.G. Walker Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment August 2000 DEPARTMENT of PRIMARY INDUSTRIES, WATER and ENVIRONMENT LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1 LAND SYSTEMS IN TASMANIA CONTAINING AREAS OF SALINITY................................................................1 Appendix 2 EXTENT, TRENDS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF DRYLAND SALINITY IN TASMANIA...................................16 Appendix 3 GROUND WATER ....................................................................28 Appendix 4(a) SURFACE WATER MONITORING .......................................32 Appendix 4(b) SURFACE WATER IN TASMANIA - An Overview ..............36 Appendix 5 POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF SALINITY ON BIODIVERSITY VALUES IN TASMANIA.............................46 Appendix 1 LAND SYSTEMS IN TASMANIA CONTAINING AREAS OF SALINITY 1 LAND SYSTEMS IN TASMANIA CONTAINING AREAS OF SALINITY · The Soil Conservation section of the Tasmanian Department of Agriculture between 1980 and 1989 carried out a series of reconnaissance surveys of the State's land resources. · It was intended that the data collected would allow a more rational approach to Tasmania's soil conservation problems and serve as a base for further studies, such as the detailed mapping of land resources in selected areas and the sampling of soils for physical and chemical analyses. It was therefore decided that this would be a logical framework on which to develop the Dryland Salinity Audit process. · Land resources result from the interaction of geology, climate, topography, soils and vegetation · Areas where these are considered to be relatively uniform for broad scale uses are classified as land components. Land components are grouped into larger entities called land systems, which are the mapping units used for this Audit.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar COP8 DOC. 6 Report of the Secretary General Pursuant To
    "Wetlands: water, life, and culture" 8th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) Valencia, Spain, 18-26 November 2002 Ramsar COP8 DOC. 6 Report of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 8.2 (b), (c), and (d) concerning the List of Wetlands of International Importance 1. Article 8.2 of the Convention states that: “The continuing bureau duties [the Ramsar Bureau, or convention secretariat] shall be, inter alia : … b) to maintain the List of Wetlands of International Importance and to be informed by the Contracting Parties of any additions, extensions, deletions or restrictions concerning wetlands included in the List provided in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 21; c) to be informed by the Contracting Parties of any changes in the ecological character of wetlands included in the List provided in accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 32; d) to forward notification of any alterations to the List, or changes in character of wetlands included therein, to all Contracting Parties and to arrange for these matters to be discussed at the next Conference; e) to make known to the Contracting Party concerned, the recommendations of the Conferences in respect of such alterations to the List or of changes in the character of wetlands included therein.” 2. The present report of the Secretary General conveys to the 8th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties the information requested under Article 8 concerning the List of Wetlands of International Importance since the closure of
    [Show full text]