6 Organometallic Chemistry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

6 Organometallic Chemistry 9/26/10 W 4:00- 6:50 PM (08/23/10 – 12/13/10) 3615 Bayou Building Zerong Wang, 3531-6 Bayou, Tel. (281)-283-3795, Fax (281)-283-3709 Office Hours: TTH 1:00-2:30 PM Middle Term Test & Final Exam Oct. 13 Nov. 10 Dec. 8 1 9/26/10 Scores Item Points Total points Attendance 200 points 200 points Middle Term 200 points 400 points Final Exam 400 points 400 points Total Points 1000 points Grade Percentage A 92.0-100% B- 78.0-79.9% D+ 63.0-64.9% A- 89.0-91.9% C+ 75.0-77.9% D 58.0-62.9% B+ 86.0-88.9% C 68.0-74.9% D- 55.0-57.9% B 80.0-85.9% C- 65.0-67.9% F <55.0% 2 9/26/10 Attendance & Performance Each class for 20 points of attendance for the following dates Sept. 22 Ch. 5,6 Sept. 29 Ch. 7,8 Oct. 6 Ch. 9,10 Oct. 20 Ch. 11 Oct. 27 Ch. 12,13 Nov. 3 Handout Nov. 17 Handout In addition, performance will be counted into your total scores, things considered for the performance include coming to class on time (e.g., not late for more than 15 minutes), and not leaving the class before the lecture ends. Organometallic Chemistry • Definition of organometallic chemistry: transformations of organic compounds using metals. • Organometallic chemistry is at the interface between inorganic and organic chemistry. – Inorganic: subset of coordination chemistry – Organic: subset of synthetic methods • Other interdisciplinary areas – Bioorganometallic chemistry – Surface organometallic chemistry – Fullerene-metal complexes 6 3 9/26/10 Traditional Organometallic Compounds in Organic Chemistry Organometallic Compounds - Reagents with carbon- metal bonds H H C C - + H3CH2CH2CH2C-Li (H3C)2Cu Li H MgBr Butyllithium vinylmagnesium bromide Dimethylcopper lithium Carbon-Metal Bonds in Organometallic Compounds C X C MgX - + δ+ δ- δ δ _ C X C MgX C Alkyl halides: Carbanions: nucleophile electrophiles react with electrophile 4 9/26/10 Polarity of Bonds Metal Alkyls • General formula R-M (R = alkyl, M = metal) • The C-M bond is a covalent bond! • However, C--M+ or R--M+ bond tend to be polarized. • This is especially true for organometallic compounds conataining the more electropositive metals, i.e. alkali and alkaline earth metals. • Generally, the alkyl fragment of the organometallic compound is very reactive; however this depends on the metal, changing the metal alters the polarization of the R-M bond. • Thus different organometallic compounds are used in many different types of organic reactions. 5 9/26/10 Alkyl halides will react with some metals (M0) in ether or THF to form organometallic reagents Preparation of Organolithium Compounds 2 Li(0) R-X R-Li + LiX diethyl ether - + δ δ _ very strong bases C Li C very strong nucleophiles organolithium reagents are most commonly used as very strong bases and in reactions with carbonyl compounds M(0) H O R-X R-M 2 R-H + M-OH Preparation of Organomagnesium Compounds: Grignard Reagents Mg(0) R-X R-MgX (Grignard reagent) THF R-X can be an alkyl, vinyl, or aryl halide (chloride, bromide, or iodide) Solvent: diethyl ether (Et2O) or tetrahydrofuran (THF) H CH C CH CH 3 2 O 2 3 O diethyl ether (Et2O) tetrahydrofuran (THF) Alcoholic solvents and water are incompatible with Grignard reagents and organolithium reagents. Reactivity of the alkyl halide: -I > -Br > -Cl >> -F alkyl halides > vinyl or aryl halides 6 9/26/10 Most halides can be used directly to make an organometallic lithium or magnesium compound except alkynyl halides. These can be made, but special methods (later) are required. R-X + 2 Li R-Li + LiX R-X + Mg R-Mg-X alkyl sp3 -C-X -C-Li or -C-MgX halide vinyl sp2 =C-X =C-Li or =C-MgX halide sp2 aryl X Li or MgX halide alkynyl sp C-X doesn’t work directly * halide X R-CO-CH=CH-R HO-CH2CH2-R R1-CO-CH=CH2 epoxide R-COOH CO R1-CO-R CuI 2 R R1-X R1-COOR2 R1-R R-Li R1-C-OH R1-CO-R2 R1-C=CH R2 R-CO-Cl O 2 R1-CHO R-OH R-CO-R R1-C=C-Li R-CO-R1 7 9/26/10 Reactions of Grignard reagents The solvent or alkyl halides can not contain functional groups that are electrophilic or acidic. These are incompatible with the formation of the organomagnesium or organolithium reagent. Grignard reagents will deprotonate alcohols 0 _ Mg + H3O HO Br HO MgBr O H HO H _ BrMg Other incompatible groups: -CO2H, -OH, -SH, NH2, CONHR (amides) Reactive functional groups: aldehydes, ketones, esters, amides, halides, -NO2, -SO2R, nitriles 8 9/26/10 ( CARBON-METAL ) carbanion - + δ δ - Carbon-metal bonds : + are polar bonds that can be represented by a resonance hybrid of covalent and ionic covalent ionic structures. Carbon-metal bonds most reactive bond percent ionic strongest base are frequemtly classified as to how C-K 51 much “ionic character” they have, by using C-Na 47 Li and Mg an index called the C-Li 43 are the percent ionic character. C-Mg 35 metals used This index states the most often importance of the C-Zn 18 ionic resonance con- C-Cd 15 tributor relative to the covalent structure. C-Cu 9 best nucleophile least reactive Organocopper Compounds - + • Lithium Dialkylcopper (organocuprate ) [(R)2Cu] Li • Cuprates are less reactive than organolithium • R acts as a Nucleophile • Oxidation state of copper is Cu(I). • Nucleophile “R” will attack various organic electrophiles. • Organocuprates are used in cross-coupling reactions to form higher alkanes. • Cross-Coupling Reaction: coupling of two different alkyls R and R’ to yield a new alkane (R-R’). This type of reaction is used to make new C-C between alkyl groups. 9 9/26/10 Molecules in Organometallic Chemistry Involves at least one TRANSITION METAL that form more than two bonds with other groups (coordinates), known as organometallic complex. Have more than one coordinates that do not involve in the reactions but stablize the complex. Coordinates bind to the transition metal via s, p bonds, involving dsp or spd orbitals, and possibly with anti- bonding orbital participated. Coordinates can be as simple as hydrogen atom (hydride), H2, NO, N2, CO, CN, or complicated molecules such as alkene, carbene, phosphine, etc. Types of Metal-Ligand Interactions • Sigma (σ) donor ligands Pi (π) donor ligands Examples of donor and acceptor ligands • Pi (π) acceptor ligands Sigma donor Pi donor* Pi acceptor* - NH3 HO CO - - - H2O F , Cl CN - - H RCOO PR3 These ligands also act as σ donors. 10 9/26/10 Why 18 electrons? antibonding Electron Counting understanding structure and reactivity Cr = 6 Rh = 9 2*Bz = 12 + 3* P→ = 6 e-count 18 Cl = 1 + e-count 16 tot. charge 0 tot. charge 0 2*Bz - - ox state 0 3*P→ - Cl -1 - ox state +1 11 9/26/10 Why Count Electrons ? • Basic tool for understanding structure and reactivity. • Simple extension of Lewis structure rules. • Counting should be “automatic”. • Not always unambiguous ⇒ don’t just follow the rules, understand them! Predicting Reactivity 12 9/26/10 Predicting Reactivity Most likely associative: II 16-e Pd 16-e PdII 18-e PdII Predicting Reactivity 13 9/26/10 Predicting Reactivity Almost certainly dissociative: 16-e Cr(0) 18-e Cr(0) 18-e Cr(0) The Basis of Electron Counting • Every element has a certain number of valence orbitals: 1 { 1s } for H 4 { ns, 3´np } for main group elements 9 { ns, 3´np, 5´(n-1)d } for transition metals s px py pz dxy dxz dyz dx2-y2 dz2 14 9/26/10 The Basis of Electron Counting • Every orbital wants to be “used", i.e. contribute to binding an electron pair. • Therefore, every element wants to be surrounded by 1/4/9 electron pairs, or 2/8/18 electrons. – For main-group metals (8-e), this leads to the standard Lewis structure rules. – For transition metals, we get the 18-electron rule. • Structures which have this preferred count are called electron-precise. Compounds Are Not Always Electron-Precise ! The strength of the preference for electron-precise structures depends on the position of the element in the periodic table. • For very electropositive main-group elements, electron count often determined by steric factors. – How many ligands "fit" around the metal? – "Orbitals don't matter" for ionic compounds • Main-group elements of intermediate electronegativity (C, B) have a strong preference for 8-e structures. • For the heavier, electronegative main-group elements, there is 2- the usual ambiguity in writing Lewis structures (SO4 : 8-e or 12-e?). Stable, truly hypervalent molecules (for which every Lewis structure has > 8-e) are not that common (SF6, PF5). Structures with < 8-e are very rare. 15 9/26/10 Compounds Are Not Always Electron-Precise ! The strength of the preference for electron-precise structures depends on the position of the element in the periodic table. For early transition metals, 18-e is often unattainable for steric reasons The required number of ligands would not fit. For later transition metals, 16-e is often quite stable In particular for square-planar d8 complexes. For open-shell complexes, every valence orbital wants to be used for at least one electron More diverse possibilities, harder to predict. Prediction of Stable Complexes Cp Fe, ferrocene: 18-e 2 Cp Co, cobaltocene: 19-e Cp Ni, nickelocene: 20-e Very stable. 2 2 Chemically reactive, Behaves as an aromatic Strong reductant, reacts with air.
Recommended publications
  • Organometrallic Chemistry
    CHE 425: ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY SOURCE: OPEN ACCESS FROM INTERNET; Striver and Atkins Inorganic Chemistry Lecturer: Prof. O. G. Adeyemi ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY Definitions: Organometallic compounds are compounds that possess one or more metal-carbon bond. The bond must be “ionic or covalent, localized or delocalized between one or more carbon atoms of an organic group or molecule and a transition, lanthanide, actinide, or main group metal atom.” Organometallic chemistry is often described as a bridge between organic and inorganic chemistry. Organometallic compounds are very important in the chemical industry, as a number of them are used as industrial catalysts and as a route to synthesizing drugs that would not have been possible using purely organic synthetic routes. Coordinative unsaturation is a term used to describe a complex that has one or more open coordination sites where another ligand can be accommodated. Coordinative unsaturation is a very important concept in organotrasition metal chemistry. Hapticity of a ligand is the number of atoms that are directly bonded to the metal centre. Hapticity is denoted with a Greek letter η (eta) and the number of bonds a ligand has with a metal centre is indicated as a superscript, thus η1, η2, η3, ηn for hapticity 1, 2, 3, and n respectively. Bridging ligands are normally preceded by μ, with a subscript to indicate the number of metal centres it bridges, e.g. μ2–CO for a CO that bridges two metal centres. Ambidentate ligands are polydentate ligands that can coordinate to the metal centre through one or more atoms. – – – For example CN can coordinate via C or N; SCN via S or N; NO2 via N or N.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Invisible Hands of Sample Preparation for Cryo-EM
    FOCUS | REVIEW ARTICLE FOCUS | REVIEWhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01130-6 ARTICLE Understanding the invisible hands of sample preparation for cryo-EM Giulia Weissenberger1,2,3, Rene J. M. Henderikx1,2,3 and Peter J. Peters 2 ✉ Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is rapidly becoming an attractive method in the field of structural biology. With the exploding popularity of cryo-EM, sample preparation must evolve to prevent congestion in the workflow. The dire need for improved microscopy samples has led to a diversification of methods. This Review aims to categorize and explain the principles behind various techniques in the preparation of vitrified samples for the electron microscope. Various aspects and challenges in the workflow are discussed, from sample optimization and carriers to deposition and vitrification. Reliable and versatile specimen preparation remains a challenge, and we hope to give guidelines and posit future directions for improvement. ryo-EM is providing macromolecular structures with the optimum biochemical state of the sample. Grid preparation up to atomic resolution at an unprecedented rate. In this describes the steps needed to make a sample suitable for analysis Ctechnique, electron microscopy images of biomolecules in the microscope. These steps involve chemical or plasma treat- embedded in vitreous, glass-like ice are combined to generate ment of the grid, sample deposition and vitrification. The first three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions. The detailed structural breakthroughs came about from a manual blot-and-plunge method models obtained from these reconstructions grant insight into the developed in the 1980s15 that is still being applied to achieve formi- function of macromole cules and their role in biological processes.
    [Show full text]
  • 18- Electron Rule. 18 Electron Rule Cont’D Recall That for MAIN GROUP Elements the Octet Rule Is Used to Predict the Formulae of Covalent Compounds
    18- Electron Rule. 18 Electron Rule cont’d Recall that for MAIN GROUP elements the octet rule is used to predict the formulae of covalent compounds. Example 1. This rule assumes that the central atom in a compound will make bonds such Oxidation state of Co? [Co(NH ) ]+3 that the total number of electrons around the central atom is 8. THIS IS THE 3 6 Electron configuration of Co? MAXIMUM CAPACITY OF THE s and p orbitals. Electrons from Ligands? Electrons from Co? This rule is only valid for Total electrons? Period 2 nonmetallic elements. Example 2. Oxidation state of Fe? The 18-electron Rule is based on a similar concept. Electron configuration of Fe? [Fe(CO) ] The central TM can accommodate electrons in the s, p, and d orbitals. 5 Electrons from Ligands? Electrons from Fe? s (2) , p (6) , and d (10) = maximum of 18 Total electrons? This means that a TM can add electrons from Lewis Bases (or ligands) in What can the EAN rule tell us about [Fe(CO)5]? addition to its valence electrons to a total of 18. It can’t occur…… 20-electron complex. This is also known Effective Atomic Number (EAN) Rule Note that it only applies to metals with low oxidation states. 1 2 Sandwich Compounds Obeying EAN EAN Summary 1. Works well only for d-block metals. It does not apply to f-block Let’s draw some structures and see some new ligands. metals. 2. Works best for compounds with TMs of low ox. state. Each of these ligands is π-bonded above and below the metal center.
    [Show full text]
  • Aromaticity in Polyhydride Complexes of Ru, Ir, Os, and Pt† Cite This: DOI: 10.1039/C5cp04330a Elisa Jimenez-Izala and Anastassia N
    PCCP View Article Online PAPER View Journal r-Aromaticity in polyhydride complexes of Ru, Ir, Os, and Pt† Cite this: DOI: 10.1039/c5cp04330a Elisa Jimenez-Izala and Anastassia N. Alexandrova*ab Transition-metal hydrides represent a unique class of compounds, which are essential for catalysis, organic i À i À synthesis, and hydrogen storage. In this work we study IrH5(PPh3)2,(RuH5(P Pr3)2) ,(OsH5(PPr3)2) ,and À OsH4(PPhMe2)3 polyhydride complexes, inspired by the recent discovery of the s-aromatic PtZnH5 cluster À anion. The distinctive feature of these molecules is that, like in the PtZnH5 cluster, the metal is five-fold Received 23rd July 2015, coordinated in-plane, and holds additional ligands attheaxialpositions.Thisworkshowsthattheunusual Accepted 17th September 2015 coordination in these compounds indeed can be explained by s-aromaticity in the pentagonal arrangement, DOI: 10.1039/c5cp04330a stabilized by the atomic orbitals on the metal. Based on this newly elucidated bonding principle, we additionally propose a new family of polyhydrides that display a uniquely high coordination. We also report the first www.rsc.org/pccp indications of how aromaticity may impact the reactivity of these molecules. 1 Introduction many catalytic cycles, where they have either been used as catalysts or invoked as key intermediates.15,16 Aromaticity in Aromaticity is a very important concept in the contemporary general is associated with high symmetry, stability, and specific chemistry: the particular electronic structure of aromatic reactivity. Therefore, the stability of transition-metal hydride systems, where electrons are delocalized, explains their large complexes might have an important repercussion in the kinetics energetic stabilization and low reactivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Three-Center−Two-Electron Bonds in Covalent Molecules with Bridging Hydrogen Atoms Gerard Parkin*
    Article Cite This: J. Chem. Educ. 2019, 96, 2467−2475 pubs.acs.org/jchemeduc Representation of Three-Center−Two-Electron Bonds in Covalent Molecules with Bridging Hydrogen Atoms Gerard Parkin* Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: Many compounds can be represented well in terms of the two-center−two-electron (2c−2e) bond model. However, it is well-known that this approach has limitations; for example, certain compounds require the use of three- center−two-electron (3c−2e) bonds to provide an adequate description of the bonding. Although a classic example of a compound that features a 3c−2e bond is provided by − fi diborane, B2H6,3c 2e interactions also feature prominently in transition metal chemistry, as exempli ed by bridging hydride compounds, agostic compounds, dihydrogen complexes, and hydrocarbon and silane σ-complexes. In addition to being able to identify the different types of bonds (2c−2e and 3c−2e) present in a molecule, it is essential to be able to utilize these models to evaluate the chemical reasonableness of a molecule by applying the octet and 18-electron rules; however, to do so requires determination of the electron counts of atoms in molecules. Although this is easily achieved for molecules that possess only 2c− 2e bonds, the situation is more complex for those that possess 3c−2e bonds. Therefore, this article describes a convenient approach for representing 3c−2e interactions in a manner that facilitates the electron counting procedure for such compounds. In particular, specific attention is devoted to the use of the half-arrow formalism to represent 3c−2e interactions in compounds with bridging hydrogen atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxidation State & Electron Counting
    Formalisms – Oxidation State & Electron Counting Understanding the nature of the metal center is critical in understanding how it reacts. There are four things we need to know: (1) The oxidation state of the metal (2) The number of d electrons on the metal in that oxidation state (3) The coordination number of the metal (4) The availability (or lack thereof) of any coordination sites on the metal Oxidation State – The charge left on the metal after all ligands have been removed in their normal, closed shell, configuration. There are two ways to figure out the oxidation state. The one we will use involves breaking the metal–ligand bonds heterolytically with both electrons going with the ligand. Examples: M Cl M Cl (+1) M H M H M CO M CO (+1) (0) M PPh3 M PPh3 (0) H H H H OR OR M M M M M M (+1) H H (0) H H R (0) R Formalisms – Oxidation State & Electron Counting Now that we know the oxidation state of the metal we can figure out the d-electron count. This can be done easily by consulting the periodic table. The 4s and 3d orbitals are very close in energy and for complexes of transition metals it is a good approximation that the d orbitals are filled first. Group # 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 First row 3d Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Second row 4d Zr Nb Mo Tc Ru Rh Pd Ag Third row 5d Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt Au 0 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 – I 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 oxidation state II 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 III 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IV 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 # of d-electrons Formalisms – Oxidation State & Electron Counting Why is knowing the number of d-electrons important? 18 electron rule – In mononuclear diamagnetic complexes, the toal number of electrons in the bonding shell (the sum of the metal d electrons plus those contributed by the ligands) never exceeds 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 2--2016
    Chem 462 Lecture 2--2016 z [MLnXm] Classification of Ligands Metal Oxidation States Electron Counting Overview of Transition Metal Complexes 1.The coordinate covalent or dative bond applies in L:M 2.Lewis bases are called LIGANDS—all serve as σ-donors some are π-donors as well, and some are π-acceptors 3. Specific coordination number and geometries depend on metal and number of d-electrons 4. HSAB theory useful z [MLnXm] a) Hard bases stabilize high oxidation states b) Soft bases stabilize low oxidation states Classification of Ligands: The L, X, Z Approach Malcolm Green : The CBC Method (or Covalent Bond Classification) used extensively in organometallic chemistry. L ligands are derived from charge-neutral precursors: NH3, amines, N-heterocycles such as pyridine, PR3, CO, alkenes etc. X ligands are derived from anionic precursors: halides, hydroxide, alkoxide alkyls—species that are one-electron neutral ligands, but two electron 4- donors as anionic ligands. EDTA is classified as an L2X4 ligand, features four anions and two neutral donor sites. C5H5 is classified an L2X ligand. Z ligands are RARE. They accept two electrons from the metal center. They donate none. The “ligand” is a Lewis Acid that accepts electrons rather than the Lewis Bases of the X and L ligands that donate electrons. Here, z = charge on the complex unit. z [MLnXm] octahedral Square pyramidal Trigonal bi- pyramidal Tetrahedral Range of Oxidation States in 3d Transition Metals Summary: Classification of Ligands, II: type of donor orbitals involved: σ; σ + π; σ + π*; π+ π* Ligands, Classification I, continued Electron Counting and the famous Sidgewick epiphany Two methods: 1) Neutral ligand (no ligand carries a charge—therefore X ligands are one electron donors, L ligands are 2 electron donors.) 2) Both L and X are 2-electron donor ligand (ionic method) Applying the Ionic or 2-electron donor method: Oxidative addition of H2 to chloro carbonyl bis triphenylphosphine Iridium(I) yields Chloro-dihydrido-carbonyl bis-triphenylphosphine Iridium(III).
    [Show full text]
  • Metal-Ligand Bonding and Inorganic Reaction Mechanisms Year 2
    Metal-Ligand Bonding and Inorganic Reaction Mechanisms Year 2 RED Metal-ligand and metal-metal bonding of the transition metal elements Synopsis Lecture 1: Trends of the transition metal series. Ionic vs Covalent bonding. Nomenclature. Electron counting. Lecture 2: Thermodynamics of complex formation. Why complexes form. Recap of molecular orbital theory. 18-electron rule. Lecture 3: Ligand classes. -donor complexes. Octahedral ML6 molecular orbital energy diagram. Lecture 3: - acceptor ligands and synergic bonding. Binding of CO, CN , N2, O2 and NO. Lecture 4: Alkenes, M(H2) vs M(H)2, Mn(O2) complexes, PR3. Lecture 5: 2- - 2- 3- donor ligands, metal-ligand multiple bonds, O , R2N , RN , N . Lecture 6: ML6 molecular orbital energy diagrams incorporating acceptor and donor ligands. Electron counting revisited and link to spectrochemical series. Lecture 7: Kinetics of complex formation. Substitution mechanisms of inorganic complexes. Isomerisation. Lecture 8: Ligand effects on substitution rates (trans-effect, trans-influence). Metal and geometry effects on substitution rates. Lecture 9: Outer sphere electron transfer. Lecture 10: Inner Sphere electron transfer. Bridging ligands. 2 Learning Objectives: by the end of the course you should be able to i) Use common nomenclature in transition metal chemistry. ii) Count valence electrons and determine metal oxidation state in transition metal complexes. iii) Understand the physical basis of the 18-electron rule. iv) Appreciate the synergic nature of bonding in metal carbonyl complexes. v) Understand the relationship between CO, the 'classic' -acceptor and related ligands such as NO, CN, N2, and alkenes. 2 vi) Describe the nature of the interaction between -bound diatomic molecules (H2, O2) and their relationship to -acceptor ligands.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Syllabus
    D. Cremer, CHEM 6341, Models and Concepts in Chemistry 1 CHEM 6341 Models and Concepts in Chemistry, Spring term Class location: TBD Lectures, time and location: TBD Lab times and location: TBD Instructor: Dieter Cremer, 325 FOSC, ext 8-1300, [email protected] http://smu.edu/catco/ Office Hours: By appointment Units: 3 Grading: ABC Letter Grade Class number TBD 1. Rationale: In chemistry, every year 2 million new chemical facts are added to what is known since decades and centuries. No chemist can memorize just a fraction of this data. Nevertheless, chemists must be able to adjust their knowledge to all new chemical observations. This is effectively done by a series of models and concepts, which summarizes myriads of data in a simple way. The course focuses on a general understanding of chemistry in terms of models and concepts that describe structure, stability, reactivity and other properties of molecules in a simple, yet very effective way. The concept of electronegativity, the concept of the chemcial bond, molecular orbital theory, orbital symmetry, the Mulliken-Walsh model, the concept of the potential energy surface, the Jahn-Teller effects, conjugation and delocalization models, the Hückel and Möbius (anti)aromaticity concepts, through-space and through-bond interaction models, the concept of the hydrogen bond, the Woodward-Hoffman rules, the Evans-Dewar-Zimmermann rules, and the isolobal concept will be discussed among other topics. Many chemical problems from organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry, transition metal chemistry, and biochemistry will be presented and the applicability of the various models and concepts as well as their limitations will be demonstrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetry 2010, 2, 1745-1762; Doi:10.3390/Sym2041745 OPEN ACCESS Symmetry ISSN 2073-8994
    Symmetry 2010, 2, 1745-1762; doi:10.3390/sym2041745 OPEN ACCESS symmetry ISSN 2073-8994 www.mdpi.com/journal/symmetry Review n– Polyanionic Hexagons: X6 (X = Si, Ge) Masae Takahashi Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-22-795-4271; Fax: +81-22-795-7810 Received: 16 August 2010; in revised form: 7 September 2010 / Accepted: 27 September 2010 / Published: 30 September 2010 Abstract: The paper reviews the polyanionic hexagons of silicon and germanium, focusing on aromaticity. The chair-like structures of hexasila- and hexagermabenzene are similar to a nonaromatic cyclohexane (CH2)6 and dissimilar to aromatic D6h-symmetric benzene (CH)6, although silicon and germanium are in the same group of the periodic table as carbon. Recently, six-membered silicon and germanium rings with extra electrons instead of conventional substituents, such as alkyl, aryl, etc., were calculated by us to have D6h symmetry and to be aromatic. We summarize here our main findings and the background needed to reach them, and propose a synthetically accessible molecule. Keywords: aromaticity; density-functional-theory calculations; Wade’s rule; Zintl phases; silicon clusters; germanium clusters 1. Introduction This review treats the subject of hexagonal silicon and germanium clusters, paying attention to the two-dimensional aromaticity. The concept of aromaticity is one of the most fascinating problems in chemistry [1,2]. Benzene is the archetypical aromatic hexagon of carbon: it is a planar, cyclic, fully conjugated system that possesses delocalized electrons. The two-dimensional aromaticity of planar monocyclic systems is governed by Hückel’s 4N + 2 rule, where N is the number of electrons.
    [Show full text]
  • The 18 Electron Guideline: a Primmer This Can Be Given to Students to Read
    Created by Burke Scott Williams ([email protected]) and posted on VIPEr on 01/10/2009. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike License in 2009. To view a copy of this license visit http://creativecommons.org/about/license/ The 18 Electron Guideline: A Primmer This can be given to students to read The 18 electron “rule” is a very useful tool for predicting which complexes will behave as “closed shell” or “saturated” species. Generally speaking, transition metal compounds with more or fewer than 18 valence electrons will be less stable than close analogs that do have 18 electrons. The 18 electron “rule” (s orbital, 3 p-orbitals, 5 d-orbitals, 2 e- in each) ( is a close analog to the “octet rule” (1 s orbital, 3 p-orbitals, 2 e- in each) in general and organic chemistry, but the much larger number of exceptions in transition metal chemistry is such that it’s really more of a “guideline” than a “rule”. But how do we learn to count to 18? There are two primary methods (somewhat analogous to the “oxidation state/ionic model” and the “formal charge/covalent model” in general chemistry. In these more traditional models, we can count the electrons around carbon in CO2 in one of two ways: Oxidation State method: 1. Remove “ligands” (oxygen) as closed shell (full octet) species, and assign oxidation states to the resultant cations and anions: C4+ + 2 O2- 2. Now bring the “ligands” back in. Each bond is worth two electrons (4 for double bonds, 6 for triple) 2 double bonds = 8 electrons, carbon is an “8 electron species” Formal Charge method: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperconjugative Aromaticity and Protodeauration Reactivity of Polyaurated Indoliums
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13663-8 OPEN Hyperconjugative aromaticity and protodeauration reactivity of polyaurated indoliums Kui Xiao1, Yu Zhao2, Jun Zhu 2* & Liang Zhao 1* Aromaticity generally describes a cyclic structure composed of sp2-hybridized carbon or hetero atoms with remarkable stability and unique reactivity. The doping of even one sp3-hybridized atom often damages the aromaticity due to the interrupted electron con- 1234567890():,; jugation. Here we demonstrate the occurrence of an extended hyperconjugative aromaticity (EHA) in a metalated indole ring which contains two gem-diaurated tetrahedral carbon atoms. The EHA-involved penta-aurated indolium shows extended electron conjugation because of dual hyperconjugation. Furthermore, the EHA-induced low electron density on the indolyl nitrogen atom enables a facile protodeauration reaction for the labile Au-N bond. In contrast, the degraded tetra-aurated indolium with a single gem-dimetalated carbon atom exhibits poor bond averaging and inertness in the protodeauration reaction. The aromaticity difference in such two polyaurated indoliums is discussed in the geometrical and electronic perspectives. This work highlights the significant effect of metalation on the aromaticity of polymetalated species. 1 Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Phosphorus Chemistry and Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, China. 2 State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces and Collaborative Innovation Center
    [Show full text]