Organometrallic Chemistry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Organometrallic Chemistry CHE 425: ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY SOURCE: OPEN ACCESS FROM INTERNET; Striver and Atkins Inorganic Chemistry Lecturer: Prof. O. G. Adeyemi ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY Definitions: Organometallic compounds are compounds that possess one or more metal-carbon bond. The bond must be “ionic or covalent, localized or delocalized between one or more carbon atoms of an organic group or molecule and a transition, lanthanide, actinide, or main group metal atom.” Organometallic chemistry is often described as a bridge between organic and inorganic chemistry. Organometallic compounds are very important in the chemical industry, as a number of them are used as industrial catalysts and as a route to synthesizing drugs that would not have been possible using purely organic synthetic routes. Coordinative unsaturation is a term used to describe a complex that has one or more open coordination sites where another ligand can be accommodated. Coordinative unsaturation is a very important concept in organotrasition metal chemistry. Hapticity of a ligand is the number of atoms that are directly bonded to the metal centre. Hapticity is denoted with a Greek letter η (eta) and the number of bonds a ligand has with a metal centre is indicated as a superscript, thus η1, η2, η3, ηn for hapticity 1, 2, 3, and n respectively. Bridging ligands are normally preceded by μ, with a subscript to indicate the number of metal centres it bridges, e.g. μ2–CO for a CO that bridges two metal centres. Ambidentate ligands are polydentate ligands that can coordinate to the metal centre through one or more atoms. – – – For example CN can coordinate via C or N; SCN via S or N; NO2 via N or N. The term can also be used to describe instances where a ligand can behave as monodentate or a chelating ligand. Bite angle is the ligand–metal–ligand angle formed when a polydentate ligand coordinates to a metal centre. 1 A Chelate (Greek word for “claw” is a polydentate ligand that forms a ring that includes a metal. Examples are EDTA, acac–, en. Heterobimetallic describes a complex in which there are two different metal centres. Homobimetallic complexes have two metal centres that are the same elements. These need not have identical ligands or coordination number, but are usually found as symmetric dimers. Homoleptic complexes are compounds in which all the ligands that bound to the metal centre are identical. A ligand is a molecule or ion that is bonded directly to a metal centre, usually by a covalent or coordinate bond. Monodentate ligands have only one point of attachment to the metal centre and occupy one coordination site only. Examples of monodentate ligands are NH3, CO, NMe3, H2O and PMe3. Polydentate ligands have more than one point of attachment to the centre and occupy more than one coordination site. By definitions above bidentate ligands and ambidentate ligands are special cases of polydentate ligands. The primary coordination sphere of a metal involves the set of ligands closest to the metal that are directly bonded. Mobile cations and anions are said to be in the outer or secondary sphere. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY Many examples of organometallic compounds involving alkyls, alkenes, alkynes, carbonyls and aromatics are known. Organometallic chemistry is a relatively recent area of chemistry (40-50 years), even though organometallic compounds have been known since 1760; e.g. As2Me4O was made in 1760. Organometallic Chemistry has really been around for millions of years Naturally occurring Cobalimins contain Co—C bonds Vitamin B12: Some other historical landmarks are: 1827 Zeise’s salt: Na[PtCl3(C2H4)] 1849 Frankland: [(C2H5)2Zn] 1890 Mond: [Ni(CO)4] – the first binary metal carbonyl, and useful in purifying Ni 1931 Hieber: [Fe(CO)4H2] – the first hydride to be made. 2 1951 Ferrocene: [Fe(cp)2] – the first sandwich complex. Nobel -Prize Winners in the area of Organometallic: Victor Grignard and Paul Sabatier (1912) Grignard reagent K. Ziegler, G. Natta (1963) Zieglar-Natta catalyst E. O. Fisher, G. Wilkinson (1973) Sandwich compounds K. B. Sharpless, R. Noyori (2001) Hydrogenation and oxidation Yves Chauvin, Robert H. Grubbs, Richard R. Schrock (2005) Metal-catalyzed alkene metathesis BONDING Bonding is essentially covalent and can be Metal–Carbon σ (as in metal carbonyls and alkyls) or Metal–Carbon bonds (as in metal alkenes, alkynes and arenes). -– + Ionic compounds are often formed with electropositive metals, e.g. (C6H5)3C Na and – 2+ (C5H5 )2Ca . These ionic compounds are insoluble in hydrocarbon solvents and are very sensitive to air and moisture. ELECTRON COUNTING The 18-electron rule The 18-electron rule is like the octet rule to the organometallic chemists. It is useful in predicting the reactivity of organomettalic compounds. It is also often violated 18-electron rule is also known as the effective atomic number rule (EAN rule). The rule is used to determine the number of valence electrons in a complex to determine whether that complex is likely to be stable or not. 18 electrons arise from electrons from completely filled five d, three p, and one s orbitals. “A stable complex is obtained when the sum of metal d-electrons, the electron donated from the ligands, and the overall charge of the complex equals 18.” 3 Counting electrons in organometallic complexes Two distinct methods are used to count electrons: the neutral or covalent method and the effective atomic number or ionic method. These are just two different methods of an accounting system that give the same final answer. All you need to do is to understand one and keep to that to avoid confusion. What are d-electrons The configuration of transition metal as [Ar]4s23dn. This representation is only true for isolated metal atoms. When a metal ion is put into an electronic field (surrounded with ligands), the d-orbitals drop in energy and fill first. The organometallic chemist therefore, considers the transition metal valence electrons to be all the d-electrons. Thus a transition metal such as Ti in the zero oxidation state attains a d4, and not d2 configuration. Thus for zero-valent metals, the electron count simply corresponds to the column it occupies in the periodic table. Fe, for example, in the 8th column is d8 and not d6; Re3+ is d4 (seventh column for Re, and then add 3 position charges or subtract three negative ones). That is, d-occupancy = group number – oxidation state Electronic contribution of ligands Method 1: The ionic (charged) model The basic premise of this method is that we remove all of the ligands from the metal and, if necessary, add the proper number of electrons to each ligand to bring it to a closed valence shell state. For example, if we remove ammonia from a complex, NH3, has a completed octet and acts as a neutral molecule. When it bonds to the metal centre if does so through its lone pair (in a classic Lewis acid-base sense) and there is no need to change the oxidation state of the metal to balance charge. Ammonia is called a neutral 2-electron donor. In contrast, if we remove a methyl group from the metal and complete its octet, then we – formally have CH3 . 4 If we bond this methyl anion to the metal, the lone pair forms one metal-carbon bond and the methyl group acts as a 2-electron donor ligand. To keep charge neutrality we must oxidize the metal by one electron (i.e. assign a positive charge to the metal). This, in turn, reduces the d-electron count of the metal centre by one. Method 2: the covalent (neutral) model The major premise of this method is that we remove all of the ligand from the metal, but rather than take them to a closed shell state, we do whatever is necessary to make them neutral. Consider ammonia again: when we remove it from the metal, it is a neutral molecule with one lone pair of electrons. Therefore, as with ionic, ammonia is a neutral 2-electron donor. For methyl, we diverge from the ionic model. When we remove it from the metal and make the fragment neutral we have a neutral radical. Both the metal and methyl radical must donate one electron each to form a metal-carbon bond. The methyl group is, therefore, a one-electron donor, not a two-electron donor as it is under the ionic formation. Notice that this method does not give us any immediate information about the oxidation state of the metal, so we must go back and assign that later. Some commonly encountered ligands donate the following numbers of valence electrons. 1-electron donor: H• (in any bonding mode), and terminal Cl•, Br•, I•, R• (e.g. R = alkyl or Ph) or RO•; 2 2-electron donor: CO, PR3, P(OR)3, R2C=CR2 (η -alkene), R2C: (carbine); 3 • • • • • 3-electron donor: η -C3H5 (allyl radical), RC (carbine), μ-Cl , μ-Br , -I , μ-R2P ; 4 4 4-electron donor: η -diene, η -C4R4 (cyclobutadienes); 5 • • • • • 5-electron donor: η -C5H5 , μ3-Cl , μ3-Br , μ3-I , μ3-R2P ; 6 6 6 6-electron donor: η -C6H6 (and other η -arenes, e.g. η -C6H5Me); 1- or 3-electron donor: NO Counting electrons provided by bridging ligands, metal-metal bonds and net charges requires care. • • When X (X = CI, Br, I) or R2P the ligand uses the unpaired electron and a lone pair to bridge two metal centres, i.e. one electron is donated to M, and two to the second metal, M´ In a doubly bridged species such as (CO)2Rh(μ-Cl)2Rh(CO)2 the μ-Cl atoms are equivalent as are the Rh atoms, and the two Cl bridges together contribute three electrons to each Rh.
Recommended publications
  • 5.111 Principles of Chemical Science, Fall 2005 Transcript – Lecture 28
    MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 5.111 Principles of Chemical Science, Fall 2005 Please use the following citation format: Sylvia Ceyer and Catherine Drennan, 5.111 Principles of Chemical Science, Fall 2005. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare). http://ocw.mit.edu (accessed MM DD, YYYY). License: Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike. Note: Please use the actual date you accessed this material in your citation. For more information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 5.111 Principles of Chemical Science, Fall 2005 Transcript – Lecture 28 All right. We have a few more PowerPoint things before I am going to attempt using the board. Again, we are in the transition metal unit. And today we are going to introduce something called crystal field theory. And this is in Chapter 16 in your book. Let me just tell you about two different theories. Again, chemistry is an experimental science. We collect data and then we try to come up with theories that explain the data, so the theories are not sort of 100%. And some are more simple and some are more complicated to try to explain what we observe. And some of these theories, although they are pretty simple approximations of what is really going on, do a pretty good job of explaining the things that we are observing. All right. There are two different kinds of theories that you will hear about with transition metals. You will hear about crystal field theory and ligand field theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Planar Cyclopenten‐4‐Yl Cations: Highly Delocalized Π Aromatics
    Angewandte Research Articles Chemie How to cite: Angew.Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59,18809–18815 Carbocations International Edition: doi.org/10.1002/anie.202009644 German Edition: doi.org/10.1002/ange.202009644 Planar Cyclopenten-4-yl Cations:Highly Delocalized p Aromatics Stabilized by Hyperconjugation Samuel Nees,Thomas Kupfer,Alexander Hofmann, and Holger Braunschweig* 1 B Abstract: Theoretical studies predicted the planar cyclopenten- being energetically favored by 18.8 kcalmolÀ over 1 (MP3/ 4-yl cation to be aclassical carbocation, and the highest-energy 6-31G**).[11–13] Thebishomoaromatic structure 1B itself is + 1 isomer of C5H7 .Hence,its existence has not been verified about 6–14 kcalmolÀ lower in energy (depending on the level experimentally so far.Wewere now able to isolate two stable of theory) than the classical planar structure 1C,making the derivatives of the cyclopenten-4-yl cation by reaction of bulky cyclopenten-4-yl cation (1C)the least favorable isomer.Early R alanes Cp AlBr2 with AlBr3.Elucidation of their (electronic) solvolysis studies are consistent with these findings,with structures by X-raydiffraction and quantum chemistry studies allylic 1A being the only observable isomer, notwithstanding revealed planar geometries and strong hyperconjugation the nature of the studied cyclopenteneprecursor.[14–18] Thus, interactions primarily from the C Al s bonds to the empty p attempts to generate isomer 1C,orits homoaromatic analog À orbital of the cationic sp2 carbon center.Aclose inspection of 1B,bysolvolysis of 4-Br/OTs-cyclopentene
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution: a “Complex Approach” PCCP
    Volume 23 Number 9 7 March 2021 Pages 5033–5682 PCCP Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics rsc.li/pccp ISSN 1463-9076 PERSPECTIVE Janez Cerkovnik et al . An analysis of electrophilic aromatic substitution: a “complex approach” PCCP View Article Online PERSPECTIVE View Journal | View Issue An analysis of electrophilic aromatic substitution: a ‘‘complex approach’’† Cite this: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., a a b 2021, 23, 5051 Nikola Stamenkovic´, Natasˇa Poklar Ulrih and Janez Cerkovnik * Electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS) is one of the most widely researched transforms in synthetic organic chemistry. Numerous studies have been carried out to provide an understanding of the nature of its reactivity pattern. There is now a need for a concise and general, but detailed and up-to-date, overview. The basic principles behind EAS are essential to our understanding of what the mechanisms underlying EAS are. To date, textbook overviews of EAS have provided little information about the Received 5th October 2020, mechanistic pathways and chemical species involved. In this review, the aim is to gather and present the Accepted 21st December 2020 up-to-date information relating to reactivity in EAS, with the implication that some of the key concepts DOI: 10.1039/d0cp05245k will be discussed in a scientifically concise manner. In addition, the information presented herein suggests certain new possibilities to advance EAS theory, with particular emphasis on the role of modern Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. rsc.li/pccp
    [Show full text]
  • Iron-Catalysed Transformation of Molecular Dinitrogen Into Silylamine Under Ambient Conditions
    ARTICLE Received 6 Sep 2012 | Accepted 6 Nov 2012 | Published 4 Dec 2012 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2264 Iron-catalysed transformation of molecular dinitrogen into silylamine under ambient conditions Masahiro Yuki1, Hiromasa Tanaka2, Kouitsu Sasaki1, Yoshihiro Miyake1, Kazunari Yoshizawa2 & Yoshiaki Nishibayashi1 Although stoichiometric transformations using transition metal–N2 complexes have been well investigated towards the goal of nitrogen fixation under mild reaction conditions, only a few examples of the catalytic transformations of N2 using transition metal–N2 complexes as catalysts have been reported. In almost all the catalytic systems, the use of Mo is essential to realize the catalytic transformation of N2, where Mo–N2 complexes are considered to work as effective catalysts. Here we show the first successful example of the Fe-catalysed transfor- mation of N2 into N(SiMe3)3 under ambient conditions, in which iron complexes such as iron pentacarbonyl [Fe(CO)5] and ferrocenes have been found to work as effective catalysts. A plausible reaction pathway is proposed, where Fe(II)–N2 complex bearing two Me3Si groups as ancillary ligands has an important role as a key reactive intermediate, with the aid of density-functional-theory calculations. 1 Institute of Engineering Innovation, School of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan. 2 Institute for Materials Chemistry and Engineering, International Research Center for Molecular Systems, Kyushu University, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.Y. (email: [email protected]) or to Y.N. (email: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • EI-ICHI NEGISHI Herbert C
    MAGICAL POWER OF TRANSITION METALS: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE Nobel Lecture, December 8, 2010 by EI-ICHI NEGISHI Herbert C. Brown Laboratories of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2084, U.S.A. Not long ago, the primary goal of the synthesis of complex natural products and related compounds of biological and medicinal interest was to be able to synthesize them, preferably before anyone else. While this still remains a very important goal, a number of today’s top-notch synthetic chemists must feel and even think that, given ample resources and time, they are capable of synthesizing virtually all natural products and many analogues thereof. Accepting this notion, what would then be the major goals of organic synthesis in the twenty-first century? One thing appears to be unmistakably certain. Namely, we will always need, perhaps increasingly so with time, the uniquely creative field of synthetic organic and organometallic chemistry to prepare both new and existing organic compounds for the benefit and well-being of mankind. It then seems reasonably clear that, in addition to the question of what compounds to synthesize, that of how best to synthesize them will become increasingly important. As some may have said, the primary goal would then shift from aiming to be the first to synthesize a given compound to seeking its ultimately satisfactory or “last synthesis”. If one carefully goes over various aspects of organic synthetic methodology, one would soon note how primitive and limited it had been until rather recently, or perhaps even today. For the sake of argument, we may propose here that the ultimate goal of organic synthesis is “to be able to synthesize any desired and fundamentally synthesizable organic compounds (a) in high yields, (b) efficiently (in as few steps as possible, for example), (c) selectively, preferably all in t98–99% selectivity, (d) economically, and (e) safely, abbreviated hereafter as the y(es)2 manner.” with or without catalyst R1M + R2X R1R2 + MX R1, R2: carbon groups.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 5. Chemical Bonding
    5. Chemical Bonding: The Covalent Bond Model 5.1 The Covalent Bond Model Almost all chemical substances are found as aggregates of atoms in the form of molecules and ions produced through the reactions of various atoms of elements except the noble-gas elements which are stable mono-atomic gases. Chemical bond is a term that describes the attractive force that is holding the atoms of the same or different kind of atoms in forming a molecule or ionic solid that has more stability than the individual atoms. Depending on the kinds of atoms participating in the interaction there seem to be three types of bonding: Gaining or Losing Electrons: Ionic bonding: Formed between many ions formed by metal and nonmetallic elements. Sharing Electrons: Covalent bonding: sharing of electrons between two atoms of non-metals. Metallic Bonding: sharing of electrons between many atoms of metals. Ionic Compounds Covalent Compounds Metallic Compounds 1. Metal and non-meal Non-metal and non-meal Metal of one type or, element combinations. elements combinations. combinations of two or metal elements combinations. 2. High melting brittle Gases, liquids, or waxy, low Conducting, high melting, crystalline solids. melting soft solids. malleable, ductile crystalline solids. 3. Do not conduct as a solid Do not conduct electricity at Conduct electricity at solid but conducts electricity any state. and molten states. when molten. 4. Dissolved in water produce Most are soluble in non-polar Insoluble in any type of conducting solutions solvents and few in water. solvents. (electrolytes) and few These solutions are non- are soluble in non-polar conducting (non- solvents.
    [Show full text]
  • FAROOK COLLEGE (Autonomous)
    FAROOK COLLEGE (Autonomous) M.Sc. DEGREE PROGRAMME IN CHEMISTRY CHOICE BASED CREDIT AND SEMESTER SYSTEM-PG (FCCBCSSPG-2019) SCHEME AND SYLLABI 2019 ADMISSION ONWARDS 1 CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the documents attached are the bona fide copies of the syllabus of M.Sc. Chemistry Programme to be effective from the academic year 2019-20 onwards. Date: Place: P R I N C I P A L 2 FAROOK COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS) MSc. CHEMISTRY (CSS PATTERN) Regulations and Syllabus with effect from 2019 admission Pattern of the Programme a. The name of the programme shall be M.Sc. Chemistry under CSS pattern. b. The programme shall be offered in four semesters within a period of two academic years. c. Eligibility for admission will be as per the rules laid down by the College from time to time. d. Details of the courses offered for the programme are given in Table 1. The programme shall be conducted in accordance with the programme pattern, scheme of examination and syllabus prescribed. Of the 25 hours per week, 13 hours shall be allotted for theory and 12 hours for practical; 1 theory hour per week during even semesters shall be allotted for seminar. Theory Courses In the first three semesters, there will be four theory courses; and in the fourth semester, three theory courses. All the theory courses in the first and second semesters are core courses. In the third semester there will be three core theory courses and one elective theory course. College can choose any one of the elective courses given in Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Forces Understanding the Relative Melting/Boiling Points of Two
    Chapter 8 – Chemical Forces Understanding the relative melting/boiling points of two substances requires an understanding of the forces acting between molecules of those substances. These intermolecular forces are important for many additional reasons. For example, solubility and vapor pressure are governed by intermolecular forces. The same factors that give rise to intermolecular forces (e.g. bond polarity) can also have a profound impact on chemical reactivity. Chemical Forces Internuclear Distances and Atomic Radii There are four general methods of discussing interatomic distances: van der Waal’s, ionic, covalent, and metallic radii. We will discuss the first three in this section. Each has a unique perspective of the nature of the interaction between interacting atoms/ions. Van der Waal's Radii - half the distance between two nuclei of the same element in the solid state not chemically bonded together (e.g. solid noble gases). In general, the distance of separation between adjacent atoms (not bound together) in the solid state should be the sum of their van der Waal’s radii. F F van der Waal's radii F F Ionic Radii – Ionic radii were discussed in Chapter 4 and you should go back and review that now. One further thing is worth mentioning here. Evidence that bonding really exists and is attractive can be seen in ionic radii. For all simple ionic compounds, the ions attain noble gas configurations (e.g. in NaCl the Na+ ion is isoelectronic to neon and the Cl- ion is isoelectronic to argon). For the sodium chloride example just given, van der Waal’s radii would predict (Table 8.1, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Eleven: Chemical Bonding
    © Adrian Dingle’s Chemistry Pages 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. All rights reserved. These materials may NOT be copied or redistributed in any way, except for individual class instruction. Revised August 2011 AP TOPIC 8: Chemical Bonding Introduction In the study of bonding we will consider several different types of chemical bond and some of the theories associated with them. TYPES OF BONDING INTRA INTER (Within (inside) compounds) (Interactions between the STRONG molecules of a compound) WEAK Ionic Covalent Hydrogen Bonding Dipole-Dipole London Dispersion (Metal + Non-metal) (Non-metals) (H attached to N, O or F) (Polar molecules) Forces Giant lattice of ions Discrete molecules Strong, permanent dipole Permanent dipoles (Non-polar molecules) Induced dipoles Dative or (Co-ordinate) (Electron deficient species) Discrete molecules To help distinguish the difference in strength of intra and inter bonds consider the process of boiling of water. When water boils the product is steam (gaseous water). The products are not hydrogen and oxygen. This is because the weak inter molecular forces are broken not the much stronger intra molecular forces. C:\Documents and Settings\AdrianD\My Documents\Dropbox\ADCP\apnotes08.doc Page 1 of 26 © Adrian Dingle’s Chemistry Pages 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. All rights reserved. These materials may NOT be copied or redistributed in any way, except for individual class instruction. Revised August 2011 Intra Bonding Ionic (the transfer of electrons between atoms to form ions that form giant ionic lattices) Atoms have equal numbers of protons and electrons and consequently have no overall charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalytic Systems Based on Cp2zrx2 (X = Cl, H), Organoaluminum
    catalysts Article Catalytic Systems Based on Cp2ZrX2 (X = Cl, H), Organoaluminum Compounds and Perfluorophenylboranes: Role of Zr,Zr- and Zr,Al-Hydride Intermediates in Alkene Dimerization and Oligomerization Lyudmila V. Parfenova 1,* , Pavel V. Kovyazin 1, Almira Kh. Bikmeeva 1 and Eldar R. Palatov 2 1 Institute of Petrochemistry and Catalysis of Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospekt Oktyabrya, 141, 450075 Ufa, Russia; [email protected] (P.V.K.); [email protected] (A.K.B.) 2 Bashkir State University, st. Zaki Validi, 32, 450076 Ufa, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-347-284-3527 i i Abstract: The activity and chemoselectivity of the Cp2ZrCl2-XAlBu 2 (X = H, Bu ) and [Cp2ZrH2]2- ClAlEt2 catalytic systems activated by (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] or B(C6F5)3 were studied in reactions with 1-hexene. The activation of the systems by B(C6F5)3 resulted in the selective formation of head- to-tail alkene dimers in up to 93% yields. NMR studies of the reactions of Zr complexes with organoaluminum compounds (OACs) and boron activators showed the formation of Zr,Zr- and Zr,Al-hydride intermediates, for which diffusion coefficients, hydrodynamic radii, and volumes were estimated using the diffusion ordered spectroscopy DOSY. Bis-zirconium hydride clusters of type x[Cp ZrH ·Cp ZrHCl·ClAlR ]·yRnAl(C F ) − were found to be the key intermediates of alkene 2 2 2 2 6 5 3 n dimerization, whereas cationic Zr,Al-hydrides led to the formation of oligomers. Citation: Parfenova, L.V.; Kovyazin, P.V.; Bikmeeva, A.K.; Palatov, E.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Concepts of Chemical Bonding
    Basic Concepts of Chemical Bonding Cover 8.1 to 8.7 EXCEPT 1. Omit Energetics of Ionic Bond Formation Omit Born-Haber Cycle 2. Omit Dipole Moments ELEMENTS & COMPOUNDS • Why do elements react to form compounds ? • What are the forces that hold atoms together in molecules ? and ions in ionic compounds ? Electron configuration predict reactivity Element Electron configurations Mg (12e) 1S 2 2S 2 2P 6 3S 2 Reactive Mg 2+ (10e) [Ne] Stable Cl(17e) 1S 2 2S 2 2P 6 3S 2 3P 5 Reactive Cl - (18e) [Ar] Stable CHEMICAL BONDSBONDS attractive force holding atoms together Single Bond : involves an electron pair e.g. H 2 Double Bond : involves two electron pairs e.g. O 2 Triple Bond : involves three electron pairs e.g. N 2 TYPES OF CHEMICAL BONDSBONDS Ionic Polar Covalent Two Extremes Covalent The Two Extremes IONIC BOND results from the transfer of electrons from a metal to a nonmetal. COVALENT BOND results from the sharing of electrons between the atoms. Usually found between nonmetals. The POLAR COVALENT bond is In-between • the IONIC BOND [ transfer of electrons ] and • the COVALENT BOND [ shared electrons] The pair of electrons in a polar covalent bond are not shared equally . DISCRIPTION OF ELECTRONS 1. How Many Electrons ? 2. Electron Configuration 3. Orbital Diagram 4. Quantum Numbers 5. LEWISLEWIS SYMBOLSSYMBOLS LEWISLEWIS SYMBOLSSYMBOLS 1. Electrons are represented as DOTS 2. Only VALENCE electrons are used Atomic Hydrogen is H • Atomic Lithium is Li • Atomic Sodium is Na • All of Group 1 has only one dot The Octet Rule Atoms gain, lose, or share electrons until they are surrounded by 8 valence electrons (s2 p6 ) All noble gases [EXCEPT HE] have s2 p6 configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Invisible Hands of Sample Preparation for Cryo-EM
    FOCUS | REVIEW ARTICLE FOCUS | REVIEWhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01130-6 ARTICLE Understanding the invisible hands of sample preparation for cryo-EM Giulia Weissenberger1,2,3, Rene J. M. Henderikx1,2,3 and Peter J. Peters 2 ✉ Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is rapidly becoming an attractive method in the field of structural biology. With the exploding popularity of cryo-EM, sample preparation must evolve to prevent congestion in the workflow. The dire need for improved microscopy samples has led to a diversification of methods. This Review aims to categorize and explain the principles behind various techniques in the preparation of vitrified samples for the electron microscope. Various aspects and challenges in the workflow are discussed, from sample optimization and carriers to deposition and vitrification. Reliable and versatile specimen preparation remains a challenge, and we hope to give guidelines and posit future directions for improvement. ryo-EM is providing macromolecular structures with the optimum biochemical state of the sample. Grid preparation up to atomic resolution at an unprecedented rate. In this describes the steps needed to make a sample suitable for analysis Ctechnique, electron microscopy images of biomolecules in the microscope. These steps involve chemical or plasma treat- embedded in vitreous, glass-like ice are combined to generate ment of the grid, sample deposition and vitrification. The first three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions. The detailed structural breakthroughs came about from a manual blot-and-plunge method models obtained from these reconstructions grant insight into the developed in the 1980s15 that is still being applied to achieve formi- function of macromole cules and their role in biological processes.
    [Show full text]