Padmapāda's Illusion Argument Author(s): Stephen H. Phillips Source: Philosophy East and West, Vol. 37, No. 1 (Jan., 1987), pp. 3-23 Published by: University of Hawai'i Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1399080 . Accessed: 06/08/2013 16:10 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. University of Hawai'i Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Philosophy East and West. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 130.65.109.155 on Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:10:28 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Stephen H. Phillips Padmapida's illusion argument INTRODUCTION Advaita Vedanta's traditionof reflectionon perceptualillusion arises out of a concernwith mukti, a "liberation"or "salvation" thatis conceivedas a radical changeof awareness,thus as a "mysticalexperience." Developing the teachings of the Upanishads and the BhagavadgTta,Sankara (circa 700 A.D.) and his followerstry to articulatea worldview that would explainthe possibility of this mysticalstate and show it to be the summumbonum (paramapuruasrtha). It is problematicwhether any Advaita philosopher,even thegreat Sanikara himself, is a "mysticphilosopher," that is, one who attemptsto describehis own mystical experienceand to theorizetherefrom.