DOCSLIB.ORG

Response to Submissions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Response to Submissions Browse LNG Precinct ©WOODSIDE ©WOODSIDE Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct SAR Response to Submissions September 2011 Summary Report Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct - Strategic Assessment Report Department of State Development Response to Submissions - Summary Report Government of Western Australia Preface The Department of State Development ( DSD) provides leadership to drive responsible development for Western Australia's future. Working closely with industry, communities and government agencies the Department delivers significant State initiatives and facilitates major resource, industrial and infrastructure projects. It also works to attract strategic investment to Western Australia, assist the development of export markets, and enable the development of strategic industrial land and infrastructure for the benefit of the State and its people. The State of Western Australia, through the Minister for State Development, is proposing to develop an onshore, common-user Liquefied Natural Gas ( LNG) precinct to process natural gas from the Browse Basin gas fields off the West Kimberley coast (the BLNG Precinct). In delivering the Precinct, the Western Australian Government is committed to balancing the needs of industry, the local community and the environment for the benefit of all Western Australians. The development of the Precinct would result in billions of dollars of capital investment, create thousands of jobs and provide significant opportunity for existing and future local businesses. The development will also provide the opportunity to substantially improve the education, health, social and economic well-being of Aboriginal people and significantly reduce disadvantage within the Kimberley community. DSD has been working in partnership with industry, the Kimberley Land Council ( KLC) and Traditional Owners to identify the most suitable location and to coordinate the establishment of the Precinct. This Strategic Assessment process is the culmination of four years of work to identify the most suitable site, based on technical, environmental and heritage criteria. On 30 June 2011 the State Government, the Goolarabooloo Jabirr Jabirr ( GJJ) Native Title Claim Group and Woodside Energy Ltd finalised agreements to secure access to the land required for the Precinct and to secure benefits worth more than $1.5 billion over a 30 year period for Traditional Owners, and the broader Kimberley Indigenous Community. This Response to Submissions report has been prepared in accordance with guidelines established by the Environmental Protection Authority. The purpose of the public review is to enable transparency and accountability by providing the opportunity for the public to provide comment on the proposal and to enable the provision of new relevant information for consideration by regulators. DSD is committed to the public review process and subsequent modification of the Precinct concept and management arrangements as appropriate. While the State recognises that there is some opposition within segments of the local community, it is considered that, given the extensive studies, broad community consultation, and the agreement of the Traditional Owners of the land in question, this location delivers the best overall environmental and social outcome for Western Australia. In relation to the proposal for the development, over 11,000 submissions were received during the public review period. The majority of these were ‘proforma’ submissions, of which there were approximately eight different versions. In total, there were 202 individual submissions (including the eight proforma versions), ranging from single page letters through to substantial reports. Of these 202 submissions, 26 were submitted by ‘named’ organisations which comprised a mix of Non-Government Organisations ( NGOs), Government agencies and stakeholder groups. A comprehensive process of analysing and responding to all 202 submissions was undertaken. A number of common concerns emerged from the submissions received. Some of these concerns are relevant at the general project and policy level, while others apply to the technical detail of the assessment process. Some of the concerns related to how the information was originally presented and described in the Strategic Assessment Report (SAR ). This Summary Report responds to common issues arising as part of the public review process, and detailed responses to individual questions are presented in a comprehensive compendium appended to this report (Appendix A). An electronic version of both this Summary Report and Appendix A is provided in a pouch at the back of this document. DSD has committed to a governance structure that is appropriate for the BLNG development. To that end, a BLNG Precinct Control Group will be established to oversee and coordinate the implementation of the Precinct Plan. The Precinct Control Group, consisting of the Department of State Development, LandCorp, Broome Port Authority and Traditional Owners, will recommend actions, plans, and strategies to Cabinet through the Minister for State Development. Traditional Owners representation will ensure the active engagement and responsibility for recommendations in recognition of the Traditional Owners' status as the custodians of the land. SAR Response to Submissions – September 2011 Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct - Strategic Assessment Report Department of State Development Response to Submissions - Summary Report Government of Western Australia SAR Response to Submissions – September 2011 Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct - Strategic Assessment Report Department of State Development Response to Submissions - Summary Report Government of Western Australia Nomenclature, Acronyms, Measurements and Units List Nomenclature, Acronyms, Measurements and Units List i Response to Submissions 1 Overview and Project Benefits 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Project Benefits 2 1.3 Submission Process 6 1.4 Document Structure 13 2 Management Response 15 2.1 The Strategic Assessment Process 15 2.2 Derived Proposal Process 19 2.3 Governance Issues 21 2.4 Management Plans 27 2.5 Land Access and Informed Consent 34 3 Stakeholder Engagement Process 35 3.1 Past Stakeholder Engagement Process 35 3.1.1 Northern Development Taskforce Stakeholder Engagement 37 3.1.2 Social Impact Assessment Engagement Activities 40 3.1.3 Public Review Period 42 3.2 Future Stakeholder Engagement 44 3.2.1 Opportunities for Engagement with Future Commercial Proponents 44 3.2.2 Opportunities for Engagement with the Foundation Proponent 45 3.2.3 Precinct Engagement Plan 46 4 Key Themes and Response to Issues Raised 47 4.1 Overview of Key Themes and Issues 47 4.2 Site Selection and Approvals Process 47 4.3 Project Description 56 4.4 General and Policy Issues 62 4.4.1 Emergency Response 62 4.4.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 63 SAR Response to Submissions – September 2011 Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct - Strategic Assessment Report Department of State Development Response to Submissions - Summary Report Government of Western Australia 4.5 Marine Factors 66 4.5.1 Marine Fauna 68 4.5.2 Marine Ecosystem Integrity 73 4.5.3 Water Quality 74 4.6 Terrestrial Factors 76 4.6.1 Terrestrial Fauna 77 4.6.2 Terrestrial Ecology 79 4.6.3 Air Quality 83 4.7 Social Factors 88 4.7.1 Social Impact Management Compliance 90 4.7.2 Human Health 91 4.7.3 Precinct Worker Behaviour 95 4.7.4 Broome Community Services 95 4.7.5 Community Identity and Tourism 96 4.7.6 Cost of Living and Accommodation 97 4.7.7 Education, Training and Employment 99 4.7.8 Local Procurement 101 4.7.9 ASIA Recommendations 103 4.8 Heritage Factors 104 4.8.1 Legislative Framework 105 4.8.2 Dinosaur Footprints 111 4.8.3 National Heritage Listing 113 4.8.4 Aboriginal Heritage 114 4.8.5 Cultural Heritage Management 116 5 Cumulative Environmental Impacts 119 6 Proposed Changes to Commitments in the SAR 121 7 References 131 Annexure Annexure 1 - Index of Questions and Answers in Appendix A 139 Annexure 2 - Native Title Documentation 145 Annexure 3 - Governance and Environmental Management Commitments (as per Indigenous Agreements) 153 SAR Response to Submissions – September 2011 Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct - Strategic Assessment Report Department of State Development Response to Submissions - Summary Report Government of Western Australia Annexure 4 - Management Strategies 165 Annexure 5 - Dampier Peninsula Planning Strategy 191 Annexure 6 - Groundwater Dependent Ecosystem Review 195 Annexure 7 - ASIA Recommendations 213 Annexure 8 - Cumulative Environmental Impacts 243 Tables Table 1.1 Summary of Kimberley Conservation Initiatives 3 Table 1.2 List of Named Organisations that Made a Submission 7 Table 1.3 Overview of Key Concerns Raised in Submissions 9 Table 2.1 State Management Strategies – Required for Precinct Management 31 Table 2.2 State Framework for Management of Social and Economic Impacts 32 Table 3.1 Summary of Stakeholder Participation in NDT Working Group Meetings 37 Table 3.2 ASIA Community Meetings (September 2009 – January 2010) 41 Table 4.1 Summary of Site Selection Analyses Conducted 48 Table 4.2 Summary of Key Proposal Characteristics 59 Table 4.3 Key Concerns Raised by Submissions - Marine Factors 66 Table 4.4 Key Concerns Raised by Submissions - Terrestrial Factors 76 Table 4.5 Sensitivity of Hydrogen Sulphide Modelling Results to Gas-field Composition 86 Table 4.6 Key Concerns Raised by Submissions - Social Factors 89 Table 4.7 Summary of Proposed Human Health Impact Management Measures 92 Table 4.8 Key Concerns
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Browse LNG Precinct ©WOODSIDE Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct Strategic Assessment Report (Draft for Public Review) December 2010
    Browse LNG Precinct ©WOODSIDE Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct Strategic Assessment Report (Draft for Public Review) December 2010 Appendix D-1 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VOLUME 1: Scope and Profile Government of Western Australia Department of State Development Browse LNG Precinct Strategic Social Impact Assessment Volume I: Scope and Profile August 2009 (updated December 2009) VOLUME 1 Contents Lists of Tables, Figures and Acronyms ......................................................................................... 5 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. 5 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... 6 List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 9 The Social Impact Assessment Overview .................................................................................. 9 Volume I: Social Impact Scoping and Profiling Report ............................................................. 9 Broome and the Kimberley: Population Now.............................................................. 10 Broome and the Kimberley: Population Projections .................................................. 10 The Population
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER JULY 2019 5 40 Years Walking the Long Road to Justice 5 Ngarrawanji, Yurrinyagem Taam and Malarngowem Native Title Determinations
    dfsf KIMBERLEY LAND COUNCIL NEWSLETTER 2019 JULY • GETTING BACK COUNTRY • CARING FOR COUNTRY • SECURING THE FUTURE PO •Box GETTING 2145 Broome BACK COUNTRYWA 6725 Ph:• CARING (08) 9194 FOR 0100 COUNTRY Fax: (08) • SECURING 9193 6279 THEwww.klc.org.au FUTURE Don’t miss pages 4 – 7 for all the latest on the Ngarrawanji, Yurriyangem Taam and Malarngowen native title determinations! 4 KLC supports Traditional Owners over unauthorised land clearing Nyikina Mangala Traditional owners have confirmed an international corporation is undertaking a land-clearing operation on Yakka Munga Station and has breached a registered Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) and destroyed important cultural sites. On the 5th of June 2019 Traditional Owners discovered at Yakka Munga Station and confirmed that the management company Shanghai Zenith has begun clearing land to make way for what we believe are irrigation channels and to harvest water. Aboriginal people are warned that this newsletter may contain images of deceased people. Mr Skinner addresses Tom Lyon, Noonkanbah Photo: Michael Gallagher Looking back on the KLC aspiration of Aboriginal people to protect 1999 - 20 years ago their sacred sites and their relationship Conservation Reserves to land. Mining companies want to deal with Aboriginal people on terms dictated CALM reserves cover 4 per cent of by the company and not as a result of the Kimberley. CALM has plans to turn paper negotiated agreements between another 6 per cent of the Kimberley land themselves and the appropriate groups. and sea country into national parks. All The practice of mining companies of it is within native title claim areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Countries of the North-West: Literature Review on Indigenous
    SEA COUNTRIES OF THE NORTH-WEST Literature review on Indigenous connection to and uses of the North West Marine Region Prepared by Dr Dermot Smyth Smyth and Bahrdt Consultants For the National Oceans Office Branch, Marine Division, Australian Government Department of the Environment and Water Resources * July 2007 * The title of the Department was changed to Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts in late 2007. SEA COUNTRIES OF THE NORTH-WEST © Commonwealth of Australia 2007. This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts or the Minister for Climate Change and Water. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2010-2011 the Kimberley Land Council Is the Native Title Representative Body for the Traditional Owners of the Kimberley Region
    ANNUAL REPORT 2010-2011 The Kimberley Land Council is the Native Title Representative Body for the Traditional Owners of the Kimberley region. We represent 29 native title claim groups across the Kimberley. Our organisation was established by Aboriginal people for Ab- original people and was formed during the political upheaval of the great Noonkanbah battle and the struggle for land rights. Our representative area covers 412,451 square kilometres and the KLC has worked hard to deliver native title to our members. The Kimberley is now 65 per cent determined native title land. We stand by our vision to Look after country, Get back country and Get control of our future. As a result, our focus as a grass-roots community organisation, is to work with ourTraditional Owners in the areas of native title, agreement making and land and sea management. Our organisation has a long and proud history and we look to continue to achieve positive outcomes for Kimberley Tradition- al Owners into the future. Kimberley Land Council Kimberley 2010/2011 Land Council Contents PART ONE | INTRODUCTION PART TWO | ACHIEVING THE PART THREE | LOOKING ReportAnnual VISION AFTER COUNTRY Our mission, vision and values .........................................3 Report on performance ........23 Land and sea management Introduction ................................5 Message from the Getting back country | The Overview ....................................83 Chairmen ...................................7 native title claims experience Land and sea projects ............87 Kimberley
    [Show full text]
  • Bardi Temperature Terms Claire Bowern and Laura Kling Yale University
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ZENODO Bardi Temperature Terms Claire Bowern and Laura Kling Yale University 1 Introduction Here we present a sketch of how to talk about temperature in the Bardi language of North Western Australia. Bardi has just three terms which refer primarily to the temperature of an item; these terms also have secondary connotations of ripeness or freshness. Bardi conforms to the most part to the generalizations proposed by Plank (2003), even though the number of temperature terms is small; however, a few areas they differ, notably in etymological stability. We present a brief overview of the language, local climate, and data sources in Section 1; in Section 2 we describe the lexicalization of temperature concepts. In Section 3 we present some comments on the grammar of temperature constructions, while Section 4 contains some additional comments on the semantics of temperature descriptions and their use in metaphor. Finally, in Section 5 we move to considering the etymological sources of temperature terms in Bardi and the Nyulnyulan family (to which Bardi belongs). 1.1 Background information about the language and people Bardi is a non-Pama-Nyungan Australian Aboriginal language in the Nyulnyulan family. While the precolonial population was probably about 400 people, in the last ninety years that number has declined to fewer than five, as the community switches to English instead of Bardi. The language has traditionally been spoken at the tip of the Dampier Peninsula, in the Kimberley Region of northern Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • What's New in Native Title June July 2015
    WHAT‟S NEW IN NATIVE TITLE June/ July 2015 1. Case Summaries – June _________________________________________ 1 2. Case Summaries – July _________________________________________ 22 3. Legislation ___________________________________________________ 33 4. Native Title Determinations ______________________________________ 38 5. Registered Native Title Bodies Corporate & Prescribed Bodies Corporate __ 38 6. Indigenous Land Use Agreements _________________________________ 40 7. Future Acts Determinations ______________________________________ 40 8. Native Title in the News _________________________________________ 42 9. Related Publications ___________________________________________ 42 10. Training and Professional Development Opportunities _________________ 50 11. Events ______________________________________________________ 51 1. Case Summaries – June Barkandji Traditional Owners #8 v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2015] FCA 604 16 June 2015, Consent Determination, Federal Court of Australia – Broken Hill, NSW, Jagot J In this decision, Jagot J recognised the native title rights and interests of the Barkandji and Malyangapa People in relation to an area covering approximately 128,482 square kilometres in New South Wales. The determination area comprised of both exclusive possession and non-exclusive possession native title. The claim was first filed on 8 October 1997. The respondent parties included the state of New South Wales, the Broken Hill City Council, Wentworth Shire Council and companies such as Telstra Corporation Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • What's in a Name? a Typological and Phylogenetic
    What’s in a Name? A Typological and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Names of Pama-Nyungan Languages Katherine Rosenberg Advisor: Claire Bowern Submitted to the faculty of the Department of Linguistics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts Yale University May 2018 Abstract The naming strategies used by Pama-Nyungan languages to refer to themselves show remarkably similar properties across the family. Names with similar mean- ings and constructions pop up across the family, even in languages that are not particularly closely related, such as Pitta Pitta and Mathi Mathi, which both feature reduplication, or Guwa and Kalaw Kawaw Ya which are both based on their respective words for ‘west.’ This variation within a closed set and similar- ity among related languages suggests the development of language names might be phylogenetic, as other aspects of historical linguistics have been shown to be; if this were the case, it would be possible to reconstruct the naming strategies used by the various ancestors of the Pama-Nyungan languages that are currently known. This is somewhat surprising, as names wouldn’t necessarily operate or develop in the same way as other aspects of language; this thesis seeks to de- termine whether it is indeed possible to analyze the names of Pama-Nyungan languages phylogenetically. In order to attempt such an analysis, however, it is necessary to have a principled classification system capable of capturing both the similarities and differences among various names. While people have noted some similarities and tendencies in Pama-Nyungan names before (McConvell 2006; Sutton 1979), no one has addressed this comprehensively.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australia Skr Issuing Authority Based on Indigenous Peoples of Western Australia
    WESTERN AUSTRALIA SKR ISSUING AUTHORITY BASED ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA 1. BE ADVISED that We, the Indigenous Tribal Peoples mentioned hereunder, as law-abiding Peoples, are invoking the Homestead principle and the Bill of Bracery (32 Hen. VIII, c.9) to stake lawful and legitimate claims upon all the gold and other precious metals present in the land and soil that we first occupied and owned for over 40,000 years prior to colonial settlements; 2. TAKE NOTICE that we did not invite European colonizers upon our land and soil. Europeans set foot upon our land and soil without valid visas and without our consent. They are yet to receive formal immigrant recognition from us as mentioned hereunder; 3. TAKE NOTICE that under customary international law and the disadvantages posed by Section 25 and Section 51(xxvi) of the Constitution of Australia, and despite the Act of Recognition of 13 February 2013 formally recognizing the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, our land and resources’ rights were pre-ordained prior to uninvited colonization; 4. TAKE NOTICE that there are 66 operating gold mines in Australia including 14 of the world's largest, 11 of which are in Western Australian making it the country's major gold producer, accounting for almost 70 per cent of Australia's total gold production. 5. TAKE NOTICE that the six biggest gold mines are Boddington (two million ounces have been mined and extracted since 2012) Fimiston, Jundee, Telfer, and Sunrise Dam. 6. TAKE NOTICE that none of us mentioned hereunder received one penny of the wealth that has been mined off our lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Karajarri: Native Title and Governance in the West Kimberley
    Chapter 5 Karajarri: native title and governance in the West Kimberley Jessica K Weir Introduction In 2002 and 2004, Karajarri had their native title rights and interests recognised to over 31,000 square kilometres of land in the West Kimberley, south of Broome.1 This is an area about half the size of Tasmania, with pastoral stations, mining interests, coastal and desert lands, and the large Aboriginal community of Bidyadanga.2 Bidyadanga has a young and growing population of around 800 people, with pressing infrastructure needs, including housing. Karajarri live as a minority within the diverse Bidyadanga population. Karajarri had one of the first native title determinations to be recognised in the Kimberley and had the first native title application in which applicants were represented exclusively by the Kimberley Land Council (KLC).3 Karajarri were thereby forging new ground in the Kimberley, as the Chair of the Karajarri Traditional Lands Association (KTLA) Registered Native Title Body Corporate (RNTBC), Mervyn Mulardy Jnr, said: No one in their wildest dreams could imagine getting beyond winning native title. Even KLC wasn’t prepared. All was focused on winning native title and getting the land, there was never a plan for after native title… So there was no structure for us. No way for us to go to the next level.4 This chapter considers this ‘next level’. With native title recognition, native title holders are formally included in a range of land and water decision-making processes, including community development issues. To manage these relationships, as well as to protect and hold their native title, the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (NTA) prescribes that native title holders establish Published by AIATSIS Research Publications 147 Living with native title an RNTBC.5 This very contemporary intercultural governance context involves the interplay of two distinct cultural traditions, and the innovation of new practices that draw on and combine different sources of cultural and legal authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter August 2012
    KIMBERLEY LAND COUNCIL getting country back caring for country securing the future Newsletter gust 2012 PO BOX 2145 BROOME WA 6725 Ph: (08) 9194 0100 Fax: (08) 9193 6279 www.klc.org.au N0 2, Au Farewell to an inspirational warrior Frank Sebastian was one of the visionary founders of the Kimberley Land Council in 1978 and we are deeply saddened by his passing on June 24, 2012. Mr Sebastian was fondly known to all as Gudjai and he will leave a lasting legacy at the KLC. Gudjai was at the frontline of the Noonkanbah march and was a strong advocate for Indigenous rights. KLC Co-Chair Tom Birch described Gudjai as a fighter and an inspirational leader. “Gudjai was one of the founding members of the KLC and he has been instrumental in building our organisation into what it is today,’’ he said. “He was a strong advocate of land rights as seen in his days as a young warrior protesting at Noonkanbah, and more recently in his fight for native title for all Kimberley Aboriginal people. “Gudjai was passionate about the KLC. He was a lifetime member of our organisation and an Executive Director right up to the end.Kimberley Gudjai will alwaysLand Councilbe a part of the KLC family and Augustwe are proud 2012 to have known this true Indigenous leader.’’ 1 Looking Back @ the KLC while also generating jobs. Five years ago: 2007 “Being recognised as the rightful owners The Ngurrara native title determination of our traditional lands means Aboriginal was handed down on November 9, 2007 – communities can take control of country recognising an area larger than Tasmania as and of our own future and that is why exclusive possession native title land.
    [Show full text]
  • Captured-State-Report.Pdf
    KEY Current or former Labor politicians Link individuals to entities they Lobby groups or membership groups with WA’s revolving doors currently, or have previously, significant lobbying resources Current or former Liberal politicians worked for. Government agencies or departments Current or former Nationals politicians Fossil fuel companies Non Fossil fuel companies with strong ties to the oil & gas or resources sector. A map of the connections between politics, government Individuals who currently, or have previously, worked for entities they agencies and the gas industry, withafocus on WA are connected to on the map. IndependentParliamentary KEY Current or former Labor politicians Link individuals to entities they Lobby groups or membership groups with WA’s revolving doors currently, or have previously, significant lobbying resources Current or former Liberal politicians worked for. Government agencies or departments Current or former Nationals politicians Fossil fuel companies Non Fossil fuel companies with strong ties to the oil & gas or resources sector. A map of the connections between politics, government Individuals who currently, or have previously, worked for entities they agencies and the gas industry, withafocus on WA are connected to on the map. CapturedIndependentParliamentary State The influence of the gas lobby on WA KEY Current or former Labor politicians Link individuals to entities they Lobby groups or membership groups with WA’s revolving doors currently, or have previously, significant lobbying resources Current or former Liberal politicians worked for. Government agencies or departments Current or former Nationals politicians Fossil fuel companies Non Fossil fuel companies with strong ties to the oil & gas or resources sector. A map of the connections between politics, government Individuals who currently, or have previously, worked for entities they agencies and the gas industry, withafocus on WA are connected to on the map.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuable and Endangered
    Endangered Working Together to Understand and Manage Threats to Monsoon Vine Thickets of the Dampier Peninsula A Summary of Key Findings Environs Kimberley West Kimberley Nature Project 2011 – 2013 Introduction Dampier Peninsula monsoon vine thickets span the traditional country of Yawuru, Goolarabooloo, Jabirr Jabirr, Jawi One Arm Pont Djabera Djabera, Nyul Nyul, Nimanburru and Bardi Jawi Dampier Peninsula people. They contain traditional bush foods, seasonal fruits, Derby Broome carving timber, medicines, tools, Biidin or Jila (freshwater Bardi wells) ceremonial areas and law grounds. Exmouth Monsoon vine thickets (MVT’s) on the coastal sands dunes of the Dampier Peninsula, Kimberley region, WA, are a culturally significant Threatened Ecological Community Beagle Bay (TEC), listed as Endangered by the Commonwealth (EPBC Nyul Nyul Act, 1999) and Vulnerable by the State of Western Australia. The Endangered listing, announced in 2013, recognises that Djabera Djabera MVT’s face a “very high risk of extinction in the wild in the Nimanburru near future”. Bardi Jawi and Nyul Nyul Rangers, with support of Traditional Owners, have worked with Environs Kimberley Jabirr Jabirr and partners to use cultural knowledge, local observation Goolarabooloo and science to understand how fire and weeds are Nyikina threatening Dampier Peninsula’s MVT’s and improve planning and cooperative management. DAMPIER PENINSULA Ngumbarl Vine Thicket Locations We have been working together since 2007, and on this Broome Landmarks Bardi Local Language Groups project since
    [Show full text]