Bindunbur Native Title Trial
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Browse LNG Precinct ©WOODSIDE Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct Strategic Assessment Report (Draft for Public Review) December 2010
Browse LNG Precinct ©WOODSIDE Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct Strategic Assessment Report (Draft for Public Review) December 2010 Appendix D-1 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VOLUME 1: Scope and Profile Government of Western Australia Department of State Development Browse LNG Precinct Strategic Social Impact Assessment Volume I: Scope and Profile August 2009 (updated December 2009) VOLUME 1 Contents Lists of Tables, Figures and Acronyms ......................................................................................... 5 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. 5 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... 6 List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 9 The Social Impact Assessment Overview .................................................................................. 9 Volume I: Social Impact Scoping and Profiling Report ............................................................. 9 Broome and the Kimberley: Population Now.............................................................. 10 Broome and the Kimberley: Population Projections .................................................. 10 The Population -
Mulan Layout Plan 2 Draft Version 6 Background Report
Mulan Layout Plan 2 Background Report Ratified Draft Version Control: Version 1 - June 2009 Version 2 - November 2009 Version 3 - March 2010 Version 4 - April 2013 Version 5 - August 2013 Version 6 - July 2020 MULAN LAYOUT PLAN 2 Layout Plan 2 (LP2) was prepared during 2008 and 2009 in partnership with the Mulan resident community and in consultation with relevant government agencies and authorities by the former Department of Planning. Following completion of draft LP2, the Mulan resident community representatives declined to endorse LP2. SPP3.2 provides that if a resident community declines to endorse a Layout Plan, the plan may not be endorsed by any other party. State agencies and authorities require a validated spatial framework for Mulan to ensure that services are provided efficiently. To provide this, the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) ratified Version 1 of Mulan Layout Plan 2 (LP2) on 9 June 2009. During the period November 2009 until August 2013 the WAPC endorsed 4 further versions of LP2. The endorsed versions are listed in part 7 of this report. The WAPC endorsed Version 6 of LP2 in July 2020. Version 6 incorporates administrative changes to the map-set and includes the addition of this report. LP2 remains a draft until such time as it has been endorsed by the resident community and other relevant parties, including the WAPC. As part of the machinery of government (MOG) process, a new department incorporating the portfolios of Planning, Lands, Heritage and Aboriginal lands and heritage was established on 1st of July 2017 with a new department title, Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage. -
NEWSLETTER JULY 2019 5 40 Years Walking the Long Road to Justice 5 Ngarrawanji, Yurrinyagem Taam and Malarngowem Native Title Determinations
dfsf KIMBERLEY LAND COUNCIL NEWSLETTER 2019 JULY • GETTING BACK COUNTRY • CARING FOR COUNTRY • SECURING THE FUTURE PO •Box GETTING 2145 Broome BACK COUNTRYWA 6725 Ph:• CARING (08) 9194 FOR 0100 COUNTRY Fax: (08) • SECURING 9193 6279 THEwww.klc.org.au FUTURE Don’t miss pages 4 – 7 for all the latest on the Ngarrawanji, Yurriyangem Taam and Malarngowen native title determinations! 4 KLC supports Traditional Owners over unauthorised land clearing Nyikina Mangala Traditional owners have confirmed an international corporation is undertaking a land-clearing operation on Yakka Munga Station and has breached a registered Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) and destroyed important cultural sites. On the 5th of June 2019 Traditional Owners discovered at Yakka Munga Station and confirmed that the management company Shanghai Zenith has begun clearing land to make way for what we believe are irrigation channels and to harvest water. Aboriginal people are warned that this newsletter may contain images of deceased people. Mr Skinner addresses Tom Lyon, Noonkanbah Photo: Michael Gallagher Looking back on the KLC aspiration of Aboriginal people to protect 1999 - 20 years ago their sacred sites and their relationship Conservation Reserves to land. Mining companies want to deal with Aboriginal people on terms dictated CALM reserves cover 4 per cent of by the company and not as a result of the Kimberley. CALM has plans to turn paper negotiated agreements between another 6 per cent of the Kimberley land themselves and the appropriate groups. and sea country into national parks. All The practice of mining companies of it is within native title claim areas. -
Sea Countries of the North-West: Literature Review on Indigenous
SEA COUNTRIES OF THE NORTH-WEST Literature review on Indigenous connection to and uses of the North West Marine Region Prepared by Dr Dermot Smyth Smyth and Bahrdt Consultants For the National Oceans Office Branch, Marine Division, Australian Government Department of the Environment and Water Resources * July 2007 * The title of the Department was changed to Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts in late 2007. SEA COUNTRIES OF THE NORTH-WEST © Commonwealth of Australia 2007. This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts or the Minister for Climate Change and Water. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. -
ANNUAL REPORT 2010-2011 the Kimberley Land Council Is the Native Title Representative Body for the Traditional Owners of the Kimberley Region
ANNUAL REPORT 2010-2011 The Kimberley Land Council is the Native Title Representative Body for the Traditional Owners of the Kimberley region. We represent 29 native title claim groups across the Kimberley. Our organisation was established by Aboriginal people for Ab- original people and was formed during the political upheaval of the great Noonkanbah battle and the struggle for land rights. Our representative area covers 412,451 square kilometres and the KLC has worked hard to deliver native title to our members. The Kimberley is now 65 per cent determined native title land. We stand by our vision to Look after country, Get back country and Get control of our future. As a result, our focus as a grass-roots community organisation, is to work with ourTraditional Owners in the areas of native title, agreement making and land and sea management. Our organisation has a long and proud history and we look to continue to achieve positive outcomes for Kimberley Tradition- al Owners into the future. Kimberley Land Council Kimberley 2010/2011 Land Council Contents PART ONE | INTRODUCTION PART TWO | ACHIEVING THE PART THREE | LOOKING ReportAnnual VISION AFTER COUNTRY Our mission, vision and values .........................................3 Report on performance ........23 Land and sea management Introduction ................................5 Message from the Getting back country | The Overview ....................................83 Chairmen ...................................7 native title claims experience Land and sea projects ............87 Kimberley -
Bardi Temperature Terms Claire Bowern and Laura Kling Yale University
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ZENODO Bardi Temperature Terms Claire Bowern and Laura Kling Yale University 1 Introduction Here we present a sketch of how to talk about temperature in the Bardi language of North Western Australia. Bardi has just three terms which refer primarily to the temperature of an item; these terms also have secondary connotations of ripeness or freshness. Bardi conforms to the most part to the generalizations proposed by Plank (2003), even though the number of temperature terms is small; however, a few areas they differ, notably in etymological stability. We present a brief overview of the language, local climate, and data sources in Section 1; in Section 2 we describe the lexicalization of temperature concepts. In Section 3 we present some comments on the grammar of temperature constructions, while Section 4 contains some additional comments on the semantics of temperature descriptions and their use in metaphor. Finally, in Section 5 we move to considering the etymological sources of temperature terms in Bardi and the Nyulnyulan family (to which Bardi belongs). 1.1 Background information about the language and people Bardi is a non-Pama-Nyungan Australian Aboriginal language in the Nyulnyulan family. While the precolonial population was probably about 400 people, in the last ninety years that number has declined to fewer than five, as the community switches to English instead of Bardi. The language has traditionally been spoken at the tip of the Dampier Peninsula, in the Kimberley Region of northern Western Australia. -
Native Title
annual report 2010–2011 report annual AUSTRALIA F O COURT FEDERAL 2010–2011 ANNUAL REPORT O FEDERAL COURT Singleton, NT Singleton, F AUSTRALIA Awabakal Local Aboriginal Land Council, Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council, Awabakal Local Byron Bay, Rubibi Community, Karajarri People (Area A), Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Metropolitan Local A), Karajarri People (Area Rubibi Community, Byron Bay, Determination, Ngururrpa, Ngurrara Part A, Githalbul People, Eastern Kuku Yalanji People, People, Yalanji Eastern Kuku Githalbul People, A, Ngurrara Part Ngururrpa, Determination, ON COUNTRY Gunai/Kurnai People, Gunai/Kurnai People, Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council, Wellesley Islands Sea Claim, Darug People, Davenport/Murchison, Davenport/Murchison, Darug People, Wellesley Islands Sea Claim, Aboriginal Land Council, Darkinjung Local , Urapunga, Meriam People, Bar-Barrum People, Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council (2001), Tjurabalan Aboriginal Land Council (2001), Darkinjung Local Bar-Barrum People, Meriam People, Urapunga, , Land Council (Municipality of Ku-Ring-Gai), Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council (Shire of Hornsby), Darkinjung Aboriginal Land Council (Shire of Hornsby), Metropolitan Local Land Council (Municipality of Ku-Ring-Gai), Kulkalgal People, Djabugay People, Ngarluma/Yindjibarndi, Nowra Local Aboriginal Land Council, Ngaanyatjarra Lands Aboriginal Land Council, Nowra Local Ngarluma/Yindjibarndi, Djabugay People, Kulkalgal People, NT Portion 2406, NT Portion 2406, Torres -
What's New in Native Title June July 2015
WHAT‟S NEW IN NATIVE TITLE June/ July 2015 1. Case Summaries – June _________________________________________ 1 2. Case Summaries – July _________________________________________ 22 3. Legislation ___________________________________________________ 33 4. Native Title Determinations ______________________________________ 38 5. Registered Native Title Bodies Corporate & Prescribed Bodies Corporate __ 38 6. Indigenous Land Use Agreements _________________________________ 40 7. Future Acts Determinations ______________________________________ 40 8. Native Title in the News _________________________________________ 42 9. Related Publications ___________________________________________ 42 10. Training and Professional Development Opportunities _________________ 50 11. Events ______________________________________________________ 51 1. Case Summaries – June Barkandji Traditional Owners #8 v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2015] FCA 604 16 June 2015, Consent Determination, Federal Court of Australia – Broken Hill, NSW, Jagot J In this decision, Jagot J recognised the native title rights and interests of the Barkandji and Malyangapa People in relation to an area covering approximately 128,482 square kilometres in New South Wales. The determination area comprised of both exclusive possession and non-exclusive possession native title. The claim was first filed on 8 October 1997. The respondent parties included the state of New South Wales, the Broken Hill City Council, Wentworth Shire Council and companies such as Telstra Corporation Limited. -
What's in a Name? a Typological and Phylogenetic
What’s in a Name? A Typological and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Names of Pama-Nyungan Languages Katherine Rosenberg Advisor: Claire Bowern Submitted to the faculty of the Department of Linguistics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts Yale University May 2018 Abstract The naming strategies used by Pama-Nyungan languages to refer to themselves show remarkably similar properties across the family. Names with similar mean- ings and constructions pop up across the family, even in languages that are not particularly closely related, such as Pitta Pitta and Mathi Mathi, which both feature reduplication, or Guwa and Kalaw Kawaw Ya which are both based on their respective words for ‘west.’ This variation within a closed set and similar- ity among related languages suggests the development of language names might be phylogenetic, as other aspects of historical linguistics have been shown to be; if this were the case, it would be possible to reconstruct the naming strategies used by the various ancestors of the Pama-Nyungan languages that are currently known. This is somewhat surprising, as names wouldn’t necessarily operate or develop in the same way as other aspects of language; this thesis seeks to de- termine whether it is indeed possible to analyze the names of Pama-Nyungan languages phylogenetically. In order to attempt such an analysis, however, it is necessary to have a principled classification system capable of capturing both the similarities and differences among various names. While people have noted some similarities and tendencies in Pama-Nyungan names before (McConvell 2006; Sutton 1979), no one has addressed this comprehensively. -
Cultural Enterprise Hub
Cultural Enterprise Hub Concept Report • August 2016 PO Box 2145, Broome, Western Australia, 6725 Phone: (+61) 8 9194 0100 Fax: (+61) 8 9193 6279 Email: [email protected] Web: www.klc.org.au Kimberley Cultural Enterprise Hub Bardi Jawi Oorany Ranger Bernadette Angus – Dampier Peninsula Cultural Enterprise Hub Report 3 General disclaimers: © Kimberley Land Council 2015 Reference: Kimberley Land Council, 2015, Cultural Enterprises Hub: Concept Report - August 2015 Acknowledgements: KLC Board sub-committee for Enterprise Hub Funding from Australian Government Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet Technical expertise and support from Jawun Corporate Partnerships Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 6 The Kimberley – Innovation in a unique region of national importance .......................................... 8 The challenge facing Indigenous communities in the Kimberley ................................................... 11 How to create a place in the real economy .................................................................................. 13 The Kimberley Ranger Network – An example of successful cultural enterprises .......................... 14 The Cultural Enterprise Hub – A win-win opportunity ................................................................... 17 The Cultural Enterprise Hub – The way forward ........................................................................... 19 The Cultural Enterprise Hub – -
Review of the Roles and Functions of Native Title Organisations
Review of the Roles and Functions of Native Title Organisations March 2014 Review of the Roles and Functions of Native Title Organisations General use restriction This report is prepared solely for the use of the Australian Government Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C). The report was originally commissioned by the Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA). In September 2013 the responsibility for Indigenous Affairs was transferred to PM&C. This report is not intended to and should not be used or relied upon by anyone else and we accept no duty of care to any other person or entity. The report has been prepared to provide a review of the roles and functions of native title organisations based on input from consultations and public submissions. You should not refer to or use our name or the advice for any other purpose. Except where otherwise indicated, the opinions, comments and/or analysis expressed in this report are those of the author or authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Minister for Indigenous Affairs nor the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, and cannot be taken in any way as expressions of government policy. Deloitte Access Economics Review of Native Title Organisations Contents Glossary ..................................................................................................................................... i Acronyms ................................................................................................................................ -
Western Australia Skr Issuing Authority Based on Indigenous Peoples of Western Australia
WESTERN AUSTRALIA SKR ISSUING AUTHORITY BASED ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA 1. BE ADVISED that We, the Indigenous Tribal Peoples mentioned hereunder, as law-abiding Peoples, are invoking the Homestead principle and the Bill of Bracery (32 Hen. VIII, c.9) to stake lawful and legitimate claims upon all the gold and other precious metals present in the land and soil that we first occupied and owned for over 40,000 years prior to colonial settlements; 2. TAKE NOTICE that we did not invite European colonizers upon our land and soil. Europeans set foot upon our land and soil without valid visas and without our consent. They are yet to receive formal immigrant recognition from us as mentioned hereunder; 3. TAKE NOTICE that under customary international law and the disadvantages posed by Section 25 and Section 51(xxvi) of the Constitution of Australia, and despite the Act of Recognition of 13 February 2013 formally recognizing the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, our land and resources’ rights were pre-ordained prior to uninvited colonization; 4. TAKE NOTICE that there are 66 operating gold mines in Australia including 14 of the world's largest, 11 of which are in Western Australian making it the country's major gold producer, accounting for almost 70 per cent of Australia's total gold production. 5. TAKE NOTICE that the six biggest gold mines are Boddington (two million ounces have been mined and extracted since 2012) Fimiston, Jundee, Telfer, and Sunrise Dam. 6. TAKE NOTICE that none of us mentioned hereunder received one penny of the wealth that has been mined off our lands.