Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 134 (2013) 284–290
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Mechanisms of Ageing and Development
jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mechagedev
Conceptual developments in the causes of Cockayne syndrome
a, b a c,1
James E. Cleaver *, Vladimir Bezrookove , Ingrid Revet , Eric J. Huang
a
Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
b
Center for Melanoma Research & Treatment, California Pacific Medical Center & Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States
c
Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Article history: Cockayne syndrome is an autosomal recessive disease that covers a wide range of symptoms, from mild
Available online 18 February 2013
photosensitivity to severe neonatal lethal disorder. The pathology of Cockayne syndrome may be caused
by several mechanisms such as a DNA repair deficiency, transcription dysregulation, altered redox
Keywords: balance and mitochondrial dysfunction. Conceivably each of these mechanisms participates during a
Ultraviolet light
different stage in life of a Cockayne syndrome patient. Endogenous reactive oxygen is considered as an
Reactive oxygen
ultimate cause of DNA damage that contributes to Cockayne syndrome pathology. Here we demonstrate
Mitochondria
that mitochondrial reactive oxygen does not cause detectable nuclear DNA damage. This observation
Transcription coupled repair
implies that a significant component of Cockayne syndrome pathology may be due to abnormal
Neurodegeneration
mitochondrial function independent of nuclear DNA damage. The source of nuclear DNA damage to
central nervous system tissue most likely occurs from extrinsic neurotransmitter signaling.
ß 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Cockayne syndrome: genes and transcription coupled repair recover has been less well investigated and may be secondary to
the impact of CS mutations on RNA transcription.
Cockayne syndrome (CS) is a neurocutaneous disorder named The discovery that repair was more rapid in transcribed genes,
in the 1950s after a dermatologist who practiced in the early and regulated by CS genes, was based on a series of direct
decades of the 20th century (Marie et al., 1958). Cellular studies in measurements of photoproduct excision in selected genes (Mans-
the 1970s discovered that CS fibroblasts were sensitive to killing by bridge and Hanawalt, 1983; Venema et al., 1990). Repair in the
ultraviolet (UV) light (Schmickel et al., 1977), ushering the alpha satellite sequence, a major repeat sequence, was found to be
subsequent avalanche of studies on the molecular characterization less efficient than in the rest of the genome (Zolan et al., 1982).
of this disorder (Table 1). The UV sensitivity was shown to be Highly expressed genes (dhfr, p53) were more rapidly repaired
associated with a failure of CS cells to recover RNA and DNA than the remainder of the genome (Bohr et al., 1985; Mellon et al.,
synthesis after UV damage (Lehmann et al., 1979; Cleaver, 1982). 1986; Evans et al., 1993). Repair was faster in the transcribed
This property was used to demonstrate that there were two genes strand than in the nontranscribed strand (Bohr et al., 1985; Mellon
uniquely involved in the disease, named CSA and CSB (also ERCC8, et al., 1987). Detailed studies of photoproduct repair in one gene,
ERCC6 respectively) and that there was overlap with another UV PGK1, showed wide variation in repair rates between the
sensitive disease xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) (Lehmann, 1982). transcribed and nontranscribed strands, as well as additional
The failure of RNA synthesis to recover after irradiation was found variations depending on nucleotide position, transcription start
to correlate with loss of rapid excision repair subsequently site and the binding of transcription factors (Pfeifer et al., 1991;
discovered in actively transcribed genes (transcription coupled Gao et al., 1994).
repair, TCR (Mansbridge and Hanawalt, 1983; Venema et al., 1990; The CSB protein has a number of properties that can be
Sancar, 1996; Wood, 1997)). The arrest of RNA Pol II at a damaged demonstrated in vitro. It has a nucleotide binding site and acts as a
site is now recognized as the initiating signal for TCR (Fig. 1) DNA-dependent ATPase (Selby and Sancar, 1997; Citterio et al.,
(Lindsey-Boltz and Sancar, 2007). The failure of DNA synthesis to 1998). The CSB protein can actively wrap the DNA (Beerens et al.,
2005) and has strand-annealing capacity (Muftuoglu et al., 2006).
CSB associates with PCNA that may be the mechanism by which
CS-B cells have reduced recovery of DNA synthesis (Balajee et al.,
* Corresponding author at: Dermatology and Pharmaceutical Chemistry,
Department of Dermatology, Box 0808, Room N431, University of California San 1999). How many of these properties are directly related to the
Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0808, United States. Tel.: +1 415 476 4563; clinical disorders remains to be established. Proteins in vitro, may
fax: +1 415 476 8218.
reveal properties that are normally suppressed in vivo or lack
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (J.E. Cleaver), [email protected]
necessary modifications such as phosphorylation, polyADP-ribo-
(V. Bezrookove), [email protected] (E.J. Huang).
1 sylation or ubiquitylation that occur in vivo.
Tel.: +1 415 476 8525.
0047-6374/$ – see front matter ß 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2013.02.005
J.E. Cleaver et al. / Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 134 (2013) 284–290 285
Table 1
Cellular and in vivo consequences of Cockayne mutations.
CSA (ERCC8) CSB (ERCC6) UVSSA
Clinical features
Growth failure Yes Yes No
Aging Yes Yes No
Neurodegeneration Yes Yes No
Skin photosensitivity Yes Yes Yes
Cellular features
UV sensitivity Yes Yes Yes
a a
ROS sensitivity Yes Yes No
Transcription coupled repair Reduced Reduced Reduced
RNA synthesis recovery Reduced Reduced Reduced
a
Although most reports describe CS-A cells as being sensitive to exogenous
Fig. 1. Nuclear and mitochondrial functions of the RNA Pol II cofactors CSA, CSB,
reactive oxygen, two reports found human and mouse CS-A cells less sensitive than
UVSSA and USP7 that regulate transcription of damaged DNA and facilitate
CS-B cells (de Waard et al., 2004; D’Errico et al., 2007) and one had normal cleavage
enhanced repair of the transcribed strand. CSA and CSB are also located in the
of 8-OH-Gua in vitro whereas CS-B cells lacked this activity (D’Errico et al., 2007).
mitochondria where they play a role in autophagy and electron transport. Nuclear
s
UVSSA cells have been less intensively investigated but two UV patients with either
functions regulate gene transcription and responses to exogenous stresses.
a CSA or a UVSSA mutation showed a normal response to ROS (Nardo et al., 2009;
Mutations in mitochondrial functions may cause accumulation of damaged
Spivak and Hanawalt, 2006).
mitochondria from endogenous oxidative stress that may lead to
neurodegeneration (Wallace, 2005; Cleaver, 2012).
s
Once the association of transcription with repair was estab- (Graham et al., 2001), and the mild photosensitive UV syndrome
lished by direct measurements in a small number of genes, (Fujiwara et al., 1981; Itoh et al., 1995).
followed by the discovery of the central role of the transcription COFS syndrome is also an autosomal, recessively inherited and
factor TFIIH in nucleotide excision repair (NER) (Schaeffer et al., rapidly progressive, neurologic disorder. The disease leads to brain
1993), little attention was devoted to further direct measurement microcephaly and atrophy with calcifications, cataracts, micro-
of rates of repair in specific genes and different functional states of cornea, optic atrophy, progressive joint contractures, and growth
the genome. There has yet to be a whole genome assessment of failure. COFS appears to be a particularly severe developmental and
rates of repair. Whether additional levels of regulation beyond neurological disease with mutations in CSB, XPG, XPD or ERCC1
transcription can affect repair remains unanswered. Recent whole (Graham et al., 2001; Niedernhofer et al., 2006; Jaspers et al., 2007;
genome sequencing studies have demonstrated that most of the Laugel et al., 2008). All of these genes are associated with
genome is transcribed into RNA at some stage, raising questions of transcription regulation either as cofactors of RNA pol II or
the definition of TCR and its restriction to protein-coding regions of components of transcription factor TFIIH.
s
the genome. Some UV-sensitive patients, defined as the UV syndrome, lack
the neurological pathology of CS but their cells are UV sensitive and
defective in TCR (Table 1) (Fujiwara et al., 1981; Cleaver et al., 1992;
2. Clinical complexity of CS I, II, UVS, COFS Itoh et al., 1995). Some of these represent mild manifestations of
mutations in CSA (Nardo et al., 2009; Fei and Che, 2012) and CSB,
CS is an autosomal recessive disease in which the clinical remarkably one resulting in no detectable CSB protein (Horibata
disorders can be classified in three general areas of growth failure, et al., 2004). Others appear to be genuinely different (Itoh et al., 1994,
s
pathological aging and neurodegeneration (Nance and Berry, 1992; 1995). A gene identified as mutated in several UV patients encodes
Weidenheim et al., 2009). Symptoms involve many organ systems another RNA pol II cofactor named UVSSA (Fig. 1) (Nakazawa et al.,
leading to cachectic dwarfism, retinopathy, microcephaly, deafness, 2012; Schwertman et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012).
s
neural defects, skin photosensitivity and retardation of growth and The wide range of severity in CS, COFS and UV patients belies
development. CS patients are sun sensitive but do not develop the essential identity of their defects in TCR. Correlations between
cancers, setting this disease apart from XP which shows high levels the clinical disorder, the functional deficiency in TCR and the sites
of skin cancer associated with failure in global nucleotide excision of mutations in CSA, CSB and UVSSA have yet to be made and there
repair (NER) (Cleaver, 2005). The absence of cancer has been is no genotype–phenotype correlation at present (Laugel et al.,
s
attributed to a high level of apoptosis caused by transcription arrest 2010). The absence of neurological disease in UV patients,
after UV exposure that eliminates premalignant cells (Ljungman and however, implies that the defects in TCR are only correlated
Zhang, 1996; Balajee et al., 2000; Proietti De Santis et al., 2002). directly with the skin photosensitivity and may not be the cause of
Subsequent work, however, using both growing and confluent developmental and neurological symptoms (Cleaver, 2012). The
fibroblasts has shown that apoptosis is caused more directly by DNA cause of these symptoms must be sought in other mechanisms. The
replication on damaged templates (Carvalho et al., 2003; da Costa default explanation of neurodegeneration in CS has frequently
et al., 2008). Normal, XP-C and TTD cells were more resistant to been sensitivity to endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS),
apoptosis when confluent than when in exponential growth; CS cells often thought to be of mitochondrial origin (Youle and van der
had similar levels of apoptosis in both states, at levels that were Bliek, 2012). This explanation needs direct examination, although
between the confluent and growing levels in XP-C cells (Carvalho it has credence because only CS-A and CS-B cells and mice are
s
et al., 2003; da Costa et al., 2008). The reason for the absence of skin sensitive to ROS, but UV cells of various genotypes are not
cancer in CS patients therefore still remains an open question. (Table 1). We will address the issue of causes of CS pathology by
Cockayne syndrome was initially classified in several categories asking: is CS (a) a repair syndrome, (b) a transcription syndrome, or
according to severity of the symptoms, mainly as CS types I and II (c) a mitochondrial and ROS syndrome.
(Nance and Berry, 1992) but these clinical classifications do not
correspond to the genes CSA and CSB. Two other disorders can be 3. Is Cockayne syndrome a repair syndrome?
included as CS-related because of their common biochemical
deficiency in TCR and increased UV sensitivity: the severe neonatal CSA, CSB and UVSSA are cofactors of RNA Pol II that are involved
lethal disorder cerebro-oculo-facio-skeletal syndrome (COFS) in a deubiquitin pathway when the enzyme is blocked by
286 J.E. Cleaver et al. / Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 134 (2013) 284–290
photoproducts or other possible obstructions to transcription such transcription on conformationally abnormal template structures;
as natural pause sites due to refractory sequences or secondary in damaged cells there will be transcription blocking lesions that
structures in the template strand (Anindya et al., 2010; Cleaver, will affect both constitutively transcribed genes and those induced
2012). CSA, CSB and UVSSA coordinate a deubiquitin pathway that (e.g., fos). A failure of transcription to recover after UV irradiation
results in the displacement of RNA Pol II from transcription blocking was one of the earliest biomarkers of the CS genotype (Lehmann,
lesions (Anindya et al., 2010; Cleaver, 2012). CSA recruits UVSSA 1982). This failure of recovery represents a global down-regulation
after UV damage to form a complex with USP7 (ubiquitin specific of house-keeping genes due to the lack of recruitment of RNA pol II
protease 7) that removes ubiquitin, stabilizes the ERCC6/RNA Pol II- and basal transcription factors to their promoters (Proietti-De-
complex (Boom et al., 2004), and restores the hypophosphorylated Santis et al., 2006). Oxidative stress similarly causes a wide-spread
form of RNA Pol II (Fei and Che, 2012). After RNA Pol II displacement, downregulation of transcription, involving genes for DNA repair,
as a result of deubiquitylation, the transcription-stalling damage is transcription, signal transduction and ribosomal function (Kyng
m/m /
removed, allowing transcription to resume. Excision of the stalling et al., 2003). In vivo we found that preweaned Csb .Xpc mice
lesion involves the later stages in the NER mechanism. The global showed a specific effect on the transcription of myelin by
recognition proteins DDB2 and XPC are not needed and excision oligodendroglia leading to a dysmyelination phenotype (Revet
proceeds with XPA (DNA damage binding), TFIIH (unwinding), XPG et al., 2012). Oligodendroglia are major players in neurodegenera-
and XPF/ERCC1 (excision nucleases) tion in ALS (Lee et al., 2012).
Defective repair of UV damage in CS cells appears to be specific One mechanism by which CSB regulates transcription is by
for cyclobutane dimers, with normal repair for [6–4] photopro- competing with p53 in regulating damage inducible genes
ducts (Barrett et al., 1991; Parris and Kraemer, 1993) and DNA (Proietti-De-Santis et al., 2006; Filippi et al., 2008; Frontini and
single strand breaks (Spivak and Hanawalt, 2006). One explanation Proietti-De-Santis, 2009; Lake et al., 2011). CSA and CSB both
for this specificity may be kinetic: rapid recognition and excision of mediate the transcription response to hypoxia via association with
[6–4] photoproducts by the global genome pathway (GGR) may p53 (Filippi et al., 2008) (D’Errico et al., 2007). CSB and p53 directly
remove them before significant transcription arrest occurs, leaving interact, such that p53 association with chromatin is enhanced by
cyclobutane dimers to be the arresting culprits. This kinetic CSB at low p53 concentrations. In contrast, at high concentrations
explanation may also apply to the mouse strains in which Cs-b p53 excludes CSB (Lake et al., 2011).
mutant mice were crossed with Xp-c or Xp-a mutants (van der A genome wide array study demonstrated that CSB deficiency
Pluijm et al., 2006; Laposa et al., 2007; Revet et al., 2012). The has similar effects on a panoply of genes as had inhibitors of
additional repair deficiencies in the double knockout mice result in histone deacetylase, DNA methylation, and poly(ADP-ribose)-
loss of excision capacity of a broad range of substrates, thereby polymerase, and suggested a general role for CSB protein in
increasing the number of transcription blocking lesions. maintenance and remodeling of chromatin structure (Newman
Strong evidence for a repair-dependent mechanism underlying et al., 2006). Chromatin remodeling involves ATP hydrolysis by CSB
m/m
CS comes from a conditional mouse mutant in which a Csb and subsequent conformational change in CSB structure that
mouse was crossed with a mouse in which an exon in the Xpa gene overcomes an inhibitory effect of its N terminus (Lake et al., 2010,
was flanked with Cre sites allowing elimination of Xpa in neurons 2011). In one of our own studies we compared differential gene
m/m
of Csb mice post weaning (Jaarsma et al., 2011). This strain expression in CSB, child and mother pairs, and found very limited
showed progressive neuronal deficiencies suggesting, in the differences in base-line gene expression (Cleaver et al., 2007);
authors’ words ‘‘. . .that adult neurons in rodents are vulnerable dysregulation was suggestive for p21, collagen XV and latrophilin
to endogenous DNA lesions when deficient in both NER and TCR, but we were unable confirm that these were a direct consequence
but are able to cope with these lesions when either the TCR or NER of CSB mutation in CS-B fibroblasts complemented with CSB cDNA
pathway are defective. . .’’ (Jaarsma et al., 2011). This elegant work (Revet et al., 2012).
demonstrates the importance of DNA repair, but as emphasized
further in this review, does not identify the origin or nature of 5. Is Cockayne syndrome a mitochondrial and ROS syndrome?
endogenous lesions.
Consistent with a repair mechanism for CS, DNA adducts of An unanticipated recent discovery has been the localization of
oxidative origin have been identified in human and mouse tissues: CSA and CSB in the mitochondria, and their involvement in repair
cyclodA accumulated in tissues of Cs-b mice (Brooks, 2007; Kirkali of mitochondrial DNA damage and in the electron transport chain
et al., 2009); G[8–5m]T, accumulated in healthy human and mouse (Aamann et al., 2010; Kamenisch et al., 2010; Pascucci et al., 2012;
tissues and was elevated in human XP-A and Ercc1 mice (Wang Scheibye-Knudsen et al., 2012; Sykora et al., 2012). Mutations in
et al., 2012b). Interestingly, the latter study did not detect the kinds CSA and CSB consequently influence the redox balance and
of single base lesions that would be typical of ROS damage, which mediate hypersensitivity to oxidative agents (Pascucci et al., 2012).
m/m
could be due to their rapid repair by endogenous glycosylases Mitochondrial content is increased in Csb mouse cells due to
(Wang et al., 2012b). In vitro studies using plasmids with defined reduced autophagy and the residual mitochondria are highly
lesions showed that CS cells repair apurinic sites and single strand abnormal resulting in increased free radical production (Fig. 2)
breaks normally but are defective at repair of oxidized bases (Scheibye-Knudsen et al., 2012). The failure of autophagy has been
(Spivak and Hanawalt, 2006). linked to neurodegeneration (Komatsu et al., 2006). The observa-
m/m
In these studies the question remains concerning the sources of tion of specific abnormalities in the Purkinje cells of Csb mice
DNA damage in vivo and whether they are intrinsic to neuronal (Laposa et al., 2007) may be related to this mitochondrial function.
cells or arise from neurotransmitter signaling or extrinsic The accumulation of damaged mitochondria in Purkinje cells can
circulating agents. block the numerous branching extensions that establish up to
150,000 synaptic neuronal connections for each Purkinje cell
4. Is Cockayne syndrome a transcription syndrome? (Girard et al., 2012) leading to Purkinje cell degeneration (Laposa
et al., 2007). The observation of mitochondrial functions for CSA
The association of CSA and B proteins with RNA Pol II clearly and CSB puts Cockayne syndrome into context with many other
points to their role in transcription regulation. Such regulation may human neurodegenerative diseases that have abnormal mitochon-
occur in ostensibly undamaged cells or after deliberate exposure to drial functions, some caused by mutations in mitochondrial DNA
damaging agents. In undamaged cells CS proteins may affect (Lax et al., 2011; Lenzken et al., 2011).
J.E. Cleaver et al. / Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 134 (2013) 284–290 287
Fig. 3. Increased reactive oxygen caused by the mitochondrial complex I inhibitor
rotenone causes cell death but no detectable DNA damage. Cells harvested 4 h after