DOCSLIB.ORG

Northeast Eurasia As Historical Center: Exploration of a Joint Frontier

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northeast Eurasia As Historical Center: Exploration of a Joint Frontier Volume 13 | Issue 44 | Number 2 | Article ID 4392 | Nov 02, 2015 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Northeast Eurasia as Historical Center: Exploration of a Joint Frontier Nianshen Song Summary: Russia and Asia.2 This paper focuses on the transborder region encompassed by the Russian Far East, northeast China, eastern In this paper I use a transborder Mongolia, northern Korea, and the Sea of lens to investigate the region Japan. I call it a “joint frontier” in that it is encompassed by the Russian Far viewed as an outer and peripheral region in East, northeast China, eastern political, economic, and social terms by all Mongolia, northern Korea, and the surrounding nation states. To understand the Sea of Japan. We need to historical dynamics of this frontier, I argue, we transcend the framework of nation- should view it not as an isolated and divided states and restore the region’s space at the margins of nation states but historical agency in a broader restore its historical agency in a broader geographic, geopolitical, and geographic, geopolitical, and economic context. economic context. We also need to We also need to view the socioeconomic view the socioeconomic transformation of the area as a process development of the area in terms encompassing at least 500 years, if not more, of a protracted process in which with multiple indigenous groups, state and various indigenous groups played nonstate actors alike, playing crucial roles in crucial roles. Recognizing the local development and interchanges. Realizing historical dynamic of this region the historical dynamic of this region will help helps to reconceptualize its us reconsider its contemporary and future present and future development. development and its place in the geopolitics of the wider region. Key Words: Northeast Eurasia, Russian Far Boundaries and Nation-Centered East, the greater Amur River region, Hunchun, Narratives Greater Tumen Initiative (GTI) The geographic area I am focusing on Since 2000, Russia has increasingly turned its encompasses the Russian Far East (including gaze eastward emphasizing the economic Sakhalin Island), northeast China, eastern potential of Siberia and the Far East. From Mongolia, northern Korea, and the Japanese 2014, international tensions in the wake of the island of Hokkaidō. We have no common name Ukraine crisis have further reinforced Russia’s to refer to this vast borderland in the “pivot to Asia,” a policy that emphasizes northeastern part of the Eurasian Continent. cooperation between its Far East and the East The modern phrase “Far East,” which was Asian countries.1 This move brought world popularly used before the 1960s, typically attention to the northeast part of the Eurasian referred to Eastern Asia (including northeast continent, a long overlooked region that is a Asia and sometimes southeast Asia). Today, substantial and conceptual “frontier” for both “Far East” as a fixed geopolitical term is 1 13 | 44 | 2 APJ | JF arguably only officially used in Russia (Dal’niy been a center of human activity, a place where Vostok), referring to the eastern territory multiple state influences intersect. Indigenous comprising the Far Eastern Federal District. inhabitants long shared a similar nomadic or Since Russia is not normally considered an seminomadic lifestyle of hunting, fishing, and Asian nation, few scholars discuss the Russian gathering. It was not until the nineteenth Far East within the framework of Asia (and vice century that these modes of production versa).3 By the same token, none of the gradually diversified with timbering, mining, indigenous terms used in Asian countries agriculture and eventually industry brought by captures this vast land stretching from the immigrant settlers. Local histories, not always Tumen River region all the way to the Chukchi in written form, largely concentrated on this Peninsula. relatively warmer part of the frontier. Likewise, if we look at today’s Russian Far East, leaving aside other parts of the region, it is clear that the local population is concentrated in its southern part. A significantly greater portion of economy in this federal district (90 percent of agricultural production, heavy industry, consumer goods production, and food processing) is in the five bordering administrative units of Amur Oblast, Jewish Autonomous Oblast, Khabarovsk Krai, Primorsky Krai, and Sakhalin Oblast. Vladivostok and Khabarovsk, the two largest cities in the Russian Far East (their populations far outnumbering that of the third largest city, Komsomolsk-on-Amur6), are both border cities and transportation hubs. Their strategic importance comes precisely from their location as gateways connecting the Russian Far East to The Northeast Eurasian Region (Revised by author the surrounding areas. from the “Relief Map of Far Eastern Federal District” in Wikimedia Commons. “J. A. O.” is the “Jewish Autonomous Oblast.”) This puzzle – there is no common name to identify this vast and geographically integrated realm – is related to another problem: the Scholars refer to the Russian Far East as a obstinate habit of understanding all space from “frozen frontier” or “the last frontier.”4 The the perspective of the modern state. Historians extremely harsh climate and mountainous and political scientists tend to look at this topography, with its diverse ecological systems, peripheral region from various “centers” and make it one of the few areas in the Eurasian with a contemporary sense of international continent that has not been fully developed by boundaries. The very term “Far East,” of modern states. The Russian Far East is of course, betrays a deep-seated Eurocentrism. In course not an isolated space. Its ecology and Anglophone scholarship, “northeast Eurasia” is geography were shared with the largernot an independent category of Asian studies geoecological realm surrounding it. Thebut only partly overlaps with “inner Asian southern part of this area (including the frontiers,” which includes (greater) Manchuria greater Amur River region5 and the Sea of as well as (greater) Mongolia, Chinese Japan) deserves special attention, as it has long Turkistan (Xinjiang), and Tibet.7 Until recently, 2 13 | 44 | 2 APJ | JF written histories in Russia, China, Korea, and centered perspective. The most typical example Japan all describe indigenous peoples (most of is the history of Russia’s eastward expansion them nomadic tribes) as “barbarian.”8 into Siberia from the late sixteenth century, Moreover, the surrounding states, recognizing which usually starts like this: spurred by the only their own parts of the region, divided this thought of the profitable fur trade, the powerful ecological and historical unit into several Stroganov merchant family, with the support of separate subregions: the Russian Far East and Tsar Ivan the Terrible (r. 1533-1584), recruited Siberia, China’s northeast three provinces and Cossack mercenaries led by Yermak eastern Inner Mongolia, northeast Korea, Timofeyevich (? -1584) to conquer Siberia in eastern Mongolia, and northern Japan. Such a the name of the tsar. With their more advanced view ignores, even denies, the historical weaponry, Yermak and his army of 840 Cossack interactions among local peoples. It also turns soldiers invaded and overthrew the Kuchum a blind eye to the longue durée development of Khan of Sibir in 1582. From this point, Moscow this land by inhabitants of multiple cultures for vigorously expanded its military power east to thousands of years before the coming of the Ural Mountains, establishing numerous modern imperial and national states. It is fortresses to solidify the new Russian colonies perhaps not far-fetched to draw an analogy in this terra incognita. In 1647 the Russians between this region and what scholars of built Okhotsk, their first fortress on the Pacific Southeast Asia, notably James Scott, call coast and what was to become the most “Zomia,” the highland region stretching from strategic Russian base in the Far East until the the Indochinese Peninsula and southwest China Amur Acquisition in 1860. It is not surprising to northern India: both are divided by modern that Russia’s eastward march is frequently seen international borders and are home to diverse as parallel to the Anglo-American westward indigenous peoples that all neighboring states conquest at the other end of the Pacific in the regard as “marginal.”9 nineteenth century.10 Historian Alan Wood reminds us of the speed of Russia’s expansion: “If one accepts the date of Yermak’s original foray as 1582, then Russia’s early pioneers had traversed the entire continent from the Urals to the Pacific in the space of only 65 years.”11 The story of the Russian expedition, important as it is, has nevertheless been presented as a one-sided colonial narrative, much like its American counterpart of Manifest Destiny. While highlighting the continuity of Russian empire/nation-building, it ignores the internal momentum of regional development over a much more protracted historical period. It compresses history to a brief moment – a mere 65 years – relegating the long durée to the status of prologue to the consolidation of the The Greater Amur River Region (Source: Wikimedia Russian state. Another problem of the Russia- Commons) centered narrative is that it isolates the eastward movement from its global context. Any historical narrative about this jointSuch a movement is depicted as an frontier, then, can hardly be immune to a state- “occasional” event due mainly to the initiative 3 13 | 44 | 2 APJ | JF of certain “national heroes” (as Yermak is of the Qing-Russian border wars (1652–1689), portrayed in modern Russian historiography). the Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895), the Russo- The impulse of capital accumulation and the Japanese War (1904-1905), the Siberian desire to join a global competition forIntervention (1918-1922), the Soviet-Japanese commercial interest are largely separated from border conflicts (1932-1945), and the PRC- the story of frontier exploitation. Soviet border war (1969), to name a few. It is no surprise, then, that being a gateway or The Russian version of frontier historiography “meeting ground”15 of different cultures and is hardly unique.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic
    water Review Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic Valentina S. Artamonova 1, Ivan N. Bolotov 2,3,4, Maxim V. Vinarski 4 and Alexander A. Makhrov 1,4,* 1 A. N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Molecular Ecology and Phylogenetics, Northern Arctic Federal University, 163002 Arkhangelsk, Russia; [email protected] 3 Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 163000 Arkhangelsk, Russia 4 Laboratory of Macroecology & Biogeography of Invertebrates, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Analysis of zoogeographic, paleogeographic, and molecular data has shown that the ancestors of many fresh- and brackish-water cold-tolerant hydrobionts of the Mediterranean region and the Danube River basin likely originated in East Asia or Central Asia. The fish genera Gasterosteus, Hucho, Oxynoemacheilus, Salmo, and Schizothorax are examples of these groups among vertebrates, and the genera Magnibursatus (Trematoda), Margaritifera, Potomida, Microcondylaea, Leguminaia, Unio (Mollusca), and Phagocata (Planaria), among invertebrates. There is reason to believe that their ancestors spread to Europe through the Paratethys (or the proto-Paratethys basin that preceded it), where intense speciation took place and new genera of aquatic organisms arose. Some of the forms that originated in the Paratethys colonized the Mediterranean, and overwhelming data indicate that Citation: Artamonova, V.S.; Bolotov, representatives of the genera Salmo, Caspiomyzon, and Ecrobia migrated during the Miocene from I.N.; Vinarski, M.V.; Makhrov, A.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion on the Early History of the Formation of Beijing Mandarin Wei
    2017 3rd International Conference on Education and Social Development (ICESD 2017) ISBN: 978-1-60595-444-8 Discussion on the Early History of the Formation of Beijing Mandarin Wei-Wei LI College of International Exchange, Bohai University, Jinzhou, Liaoning, China [email protected] Keywords: Beijing Mandarin Area, Early History, Ethnic Fusion, Language Contact. Abstract. Beijing Mandarin is more than a thousand year ago Yan Yan dialect, based on the integration of the Central Plains Han and northern ethnic minority language components gradually formed. Beijing Mandarin before the formal formation of a long period of gestation, revealing the Sui and Tang dynasties before the formation of the Beijing Mandarin area early human history, for the understanding of Beijing Mandarin language situation is very important. Introduction In this article, "Beijing Mandarin area" means including Beijing urban and suburban county, Hebei Chengde area, much of the northeast in addition to Liaodong peninsula, and parts of Chifeng, Inner Mongolia autonomous region, the general area (Lin Tao, 1987; Zhang Shifang, 2010). "From the northeast to Beijing, in history, there are two common characteristics: one is the ethnic group for a long time, and second, the population flow, this kind of situation lasted nearly one thousand years, the development of northeast dialect and Beijing dialect is extremely far-reaching influence."[1] Beijing dialect and northeast dialect in one thousand to influence each other, eventually forming a Beijing mandarin, including large areas of the northeast and Beijing area. The formation of Beijing mandarin has experienced a long historical process, is more than one thousand years ago YouYan dialect, on the basis of constantly fusion of han nationality and composition of gradually formed in the northern minority languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchuria Documents to Examine
    Source 1 Source Information: The Legacy of the Soviet Union Offensives of August 1945 https://amti.csis.org/the-legacy-of-the-soviet-offensives-of-august-1945/ ____________________________________________________________________________ THE LEGACY OF THE SOVIET OFFENSIVES OF AUGUST 1945 BY JEFF MANKOFF | AUGUST 13, 2015 JAPAN, RUSSIA, UNITED STATES The Second World War was an unparalleled calamity for the Soviet Union. As many as 27 million Soviet soldiers and civilians died as a result of the conflict that started with the German invasion of Poland in September 1939 and ended with the Japanese surrender in August 1945. Consumed by this existential struggle along its western border, the Soviet Union was a comparatively minor factor in the Pacific War until the very end. Yet Moscow’s timely intervention in the war against Japan allowed it to expand its influence along the Pacific Rim. With the breakdown of Allied unity soon heralding the onset of the Cold War, Soviet gains in Asia also left a legacy of division and confrontation, some of which endure into the present. By the 1930s, Stalin’s Soviet Union and Imperial Japan both viewed themselves as rising powers with ambitions to extend their territorial holdings. In addition to a strategic rivalry dating back to the 19th century, they now nursed an ideological enmity born of the Bolshevik Revolution and the ultraconservative military’s growing hold on Japanese politics. In 1935, Japan signed the AntiComintern Pact with Hitler’s Germany, laying the foundation for the creation of the Axis (Fascist Italy would join the following year). The two militaries engaged in a series of skirmishes along the frontier between Soviet Siberia and Japanese-occupied Manchuria (Manchukuo) during the late 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I Author(S): Hugh M
    Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I Author(s): Hugh M. Raup Source: Botanical Review, Vol. 7, No. 3, Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I (Mar., 1941), pp. 147-208 Published by: Springer on behalf of New York Botanical Garden Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4353246 Accessed: 15-12-2017 21:12 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Springer, New York Botanical Garden Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Botanical Review This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:12:58 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms THE BOTANICAL REVIEW VOL. VII MARCH, 1941 No. 3 BOTANICAL PROBLEMS IN BOREAL AMERICA. I HUGH M. RAUP Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ................ ........................... 148 Acknowledgments . ........................................... 150 Exploration .............. ............................. 151 Physiographic History ........................................... 161 Climate ........................................................... 169 Origin and Distribution of the Flora Speciation and Endemism .173 The Theory of Persistence The Darwin-Hooker Concept ............................... 178 The Nunatak Hypothesis .......... .......... 181 Conservatism vs. Aggressiveness ............................. 184 Wynne-Edwards' Criticism of the Nunatak Hypothesis . 186 Discussion of Wynne-Edwards' Criticism .188 Hulten's Studies of Arctic and Boreal Biota Statement of the Problem .198 Plastic vs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Summary of Japanese-Ainu Relations and the Depiction of The
    The road from Ainu barbarian to Japanese primitive: A brief summary of Japanese-ainu relations in a historical perspective Noémi GODEFROY Centre d’Etudes Japonaises (CEJ) “Populations Japonaises” Research Group Proceedings from the 3rd Consortium for Asian and African Studies (CAAS) “Making a difference: representing/constructing the other in Asian/African Media, Cinema and languages”, 16-18 February 2012, published by OFIAS at the Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, p.201-212 Edward Saïd, in his ground-breaking work Orientalism, underlines that to represent the “Other” is to manipulate him. This has been an instrument of submission towards Asia during the age of European expansion, but the use of such a process is not confined to European domination. For centuries, the relationship between Japan and its northern neighbors, the Ainu, is based on economical domination and dependency. In this regard, the Ainu’s foreignness, impurity and “barbaric appearance” - their qualities as inferior “Others” - are emphasized in descriptive texts or by the regular staging of such diplomatic practices as “barbarian audiences”, thus highlighting the Japanese cultural and territorial superiority. But from 1868, the construction of the Meiji nation-state requires the assimilation and acculturation of the Ainu people. As Japan undergoes what Fukuzawa Yukichi refers to as the “opening to civilization” (文明開化 bunmei kaika) by learning from the West, it also plays the role of the civilizer towards the Ainu. The historical case study of the relationship between Japanese and Ainu from up to Meiji highlights the evolution of Japan’s own self-image and identity, from an emerging state, subduing barbarians, to newly unified state - whose ultramarine relations are inspired by a Chinese-inspired ethnocentrism and rejection of outside influence- during the Edo period, and finally to an aspiring nation-state, seeking to assert itself while avoiding colonization at Meiji.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchu Grammar (Gorelova).Pdf
    HdO.Gorelova.7.vw.L 25-04-2002 15:50 Pagina 1 MANCHU GRAMMAR HdO.Gorelova.7.vw.L 25-04-2002 15:50 Pagina 2 HANDBOOK OF ORIENTAL STUDIES HANDBUCH DER ORIENTALISTIK SECTION EIGHT CENTRAL ASIA edited by LILIYA M. GORELOVA VOLUME SEVEN MANCHU GRAMMAR HdO.Gorelova.7.vw.L 25-04-2002 15:50 Pagina 3 MANCHU GRAMMAR EDITED BY LILIYA M. GORELOVA BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON • KÖLN 2002 HdO.Gorelova.7.vw.L 25-04-2002 15:50 Pagina 4 This book is printed on acid-free paper Die Deutsche Bibliothek – CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Gorelova, Liliya M.: Manchu Grammar / ed. by Liliya M. Gorelova. – Leiden ; Boston ; Köln : Brill, 2002 (Handbook of oriental studies : Sect.. 8, Central Asia ; 7) ISBN 90–04–12307–5 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gorelova, Liliya M. Manchu grammar / Liliya M. Gorelova p. cm. — (Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section eight. Central Asia ; vol.7) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 9004123075 (alk. paper) 1. Manchu language—Grammar. I. Gorelova, Liliya M. II. Handbuch der Orientalis tik. Achte Abteilung, Handbook of Uralic studies ; vol.7 PL473 .M36 2002 494’.1—dc21 2001022205 ISSN 0169-8524 ISBN 90 04 12307 5 © Copyright 2002 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by E.J. Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910 Danvers MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • In Koguryo Dynasty the State-Formation History Starts from B
    International Journal of Korean History(Vol.6, Dec.2004) 1 History of Koguryŏ and China’s Northeast Asian Project 1Park Kyeong-chul * Introduction The Koguryŏ Dynasty, established during the 3rd century B.C. around the Maek tribe is believed to have begun its function as a centralized entity in the Northeast Asia region. During the period between 1st century B.C. and 1st century A.D. aggressive regional expansion policy from the Koguryŏ made it possible to overcome its territorial limitations and weak economic basis. By the end of the 4th century A.D., Koguryŏ emerged as an empire that had acquired its own independent lebensraum in Northeast Asia. This research paper will delve into identifying actual founders of the Koguryŏ Dynasty and shed light on their lives prior to the actual establishment of the Dynasty. Then on, I will analyze the establishment process of Koguryŏ Dynasty. Thereafter, I will analyze the history of Koguryŏ Dynasty at three different stages: the despotic military state period, the period in which Koguryŏ emerged as an independent empire in Northeast Asia, and the era of war against the Sui and Tang dynasty. Upon completion of the above task, I will illustrate the importance of Koguryŏ history for Koreans. Finally, I attempt to unearth the real objectives why the Chinese academics are actively promoting the Northeast Asian Project. * Professor, Dept. of Liberal Arts, Kangnam University 2 History of Koguryŏ and China’s Northeast Asian Project The Yemaek tribe and their culture1 The main centers of East Asian culture in approximately 2000 B.C. were China - by this point it had already become an agrarian society - and the Mongol-Siberian region where nomadic cultures reign.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2020 1(4)
    What’s in this issue Welcome Message Eye on Japan Tokyo Days – report by Nadine Willems Piece of Japan Upcoming Events General Links Editor: Oliver Moxham, CJS Project Coordinator CJS Director: Professor Simon Kaner Contact Us Header photo by editor Welcome Message CJS ニュースレターへようこそ！ Welcome to the first May edition of the CJS e-newsletter. This week we are happy to bring you positive news from Japan on handling of the pandemic as infection rates continue to slow after a thankfully quiet Golden Week and the government finally accepts that the virus may not simply disappear by the end of May. We have inspiring stories of human kindness in Japan to keep spirits up, a brand new article from Nadine Willems on the trials of acquiring masks in lockdown Tokyo and a raft of cultural goodies on the theme of humanity versus nature in our Piece of Japan segment. You can find a message from CJS Director Professor Simon Kaner on the Sainsbury Institute for the Study of Japanese Arts and Cultures website and hear more from our SISJAC colleagues on their monthly e-bulletin. We hope you enjoy reading and as ever look forward to hearing from you on what you would like to see in future issues. Written by Oliver Moxham, CJS Project Coordinator and editor Editor’s note: Japanese names are given in the Japanese form of family name first i.e. Matsumoto Mariko Eye on Japan: Quiet Golden Week|Flattening the Curve|Castles in the Spotlight 日本の最新情報 As Golden Week passes by with World Heritage Sites on high alert for daring sightseers, it would seem that most heeded the calls to at least not travel, if not stay indoors.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Regents Review Packet 16-B
    GLOBAL REGENTS REVIEW PACKET NUMBER 16-B - PAGE 1 of 24 THIS IS GLOBAL REGENTS REVIEW PACKET NUMBER 16-B THE TOPICS OF STUDY IN THIS PACKET ARE: • JAPAN’S TOKUGAWA SHOGUNATE • THE MEIJI RESTORATION • JAPANESE IMPERIALISM GLOBAL REGENTS REVIEW PACKET NUMBER 16-B - PAGE 2 of 24 JAPAN’S TOKUGAWA SHOGUNATE The Tokugawa shogunate created a FEUDAL government in Japan; FEUDALISM provided SOCIAL STABILITY; Know the social structure of feudal Japan: (Emperor>Shogun>Daimyo>Samurai>Peasants & Artisans>Merchants); Samurai = WARRIORS, they followed the CODE OF BUSHIDO; The Tokugawa shoguns ISOLATED JAPAN; geographic isolation often leads to the strengthening of traditional culture; Japanese isolation ended when Commodore Matthew Perry forced Japan to open up trade with the West. • The Tokugawa shoguns gained control of Japan in the 1600s. Tokugawa = the name of the family that ruled Japan from 1603 – 1868 shogun = the leader of Japanʼs military—this job was hereditary (it was inherited) The term shogunate refers to the Japanese government during the era it was ruled by Tokugawa shoguns. • The Tokugawa shogunate created a FEUDAL government in Japan. Feudalism is a system in which land is exchanged for military service and loyalty. FEUDALISM can be described as a DECENTRALIZED POLITICAL SYSTEM that also provides SOCIAL STABILITY (or social structure). For this reason, feudalism is sometimes referred to as a both a political system and a social system. The Global Regents Exam often compares Japanese (Tokugawa) feudalism to Medieval European feudalism. In both Japan and Europe, emperors and kings were to weak to prevent invasions or stop internal disputes. Feudalism provided a way for rulers to preserve law and order (see Regents Review Packet #5 for more on European feudalism).
    [Show full text]
  • Crania Japonica: Ethnographic Portraiture, Scientific Discourse, and the Fashioning of Ainu/Japanese Colonial Identities
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Fall 1-7-2020 Crania Japonica: Ethnographic Portraiture, Scientific Discourse, and the Fashioning of Ainu/Japanese Colonial Identities Jeffrey Braytenbah Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Asian History Commons, and the Asian Studies Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Braytenbah, Jeffrey, "Crania Japonica: Ethnographic Portraiture, Scientific Discourse, and the ashioningF of Ainu/Japanese Colonial Identities" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5356. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7229 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Crania Japonica: Ethnographic Portraiture, Scientific Discourse, and the Fashioning of Ainu/Japanese Colonial Identities by Jeff Braytenbah A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Thesis Committee: Kenneth J. Ruoff, Chair Laura Robson Jennifer Tappan Portland State University 2019 © 2019 Jeff Braytenbah Abstract Japan’s colonial activities on the island of Hokkaido were instrumental to the creation of modern Japanese national identity. Within this construction, the indigenous Ainu people came to be seen in dialectical opposition to the 'modern' and 'civilized' identity that Japanese colonial actors fashioned for themselves. This process was articulated through travel literature, ethnographic portraiture, and discourse in scientific racism which racialized perceived divisions between the Ainu and Japanese and contributed to the unmaking of the Ainu homeland: Ainu Mosir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moon Bear As a Symbol of Yama Its Significance in the Folklore of Upland Hunting in Japan
    Catherine Knight Independent Scholar The Moon Bear as a Symbol of Yama Its Significance in the Folklore of Upland Hunting in Japan The Asiatic black bear, or “moon bear,” has inhabited Japan since pre- historic times, and is the largest animal to have roamed Honshū, Shikoku, and Kyūshū since mega-fauna became extinct on the Japanese archipelago after the last glacial period. Even so, it features only rarely in the folklore, literature, and arts of Japan’s mainstream culture. Its relative invisibility in the dominant lowland agrarian-based culture of Japan contrasts markedly with its cultural significance in many upland regions where subsistence lifestyles based on hunting, gathering, and beliefs centered on the mountain deity (yama no kami) have persisted until recently. This article explores the significance of the bear in the upland regions of Japan, particularly as it is manifested in the folklore of communities centered on hunting, such as those of the matagi, and attempts to explain why the bear, and folklore focused on the bear, is largely ignored in mainstream Japanese culture. keywords: Tsukinowaguma—moon bear—matagi hunters—yama no kami—upland communities—folklore Asian Ethnology Volume 67, Number 1 • 2008, 79–101 © Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture nimals are common motifs in Japanese folklore and folk religion. Of the Amammals, there is a wealth of folklore concerning the fox, raccoon dog (tanuki), and wolf, for example. The fox is regarded as sacred, and is inextricably associated with inari, originally one of the deities of cereals and a central deity in Japanese folk religion. It has therefore become closely connected with rice agri- culture and thus is an animal symbol central to Japan’s agrarian culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Style of Traditional Manchu Residence in Liaoning Province, China
    Architectural Style of Traditional Manchu Residence in Liaoning Province, China Dan Yang 1, Yao Fu 2and Mahito Nakazono 3 1 Doctoral Course, Graduate School of Science and Eng., Yamaguchi Univ. 2 Professor, Collage of Architecture and Planning, Shenyang Jianzhu Univ. Dr. Architecture 3 Professor, Graduate School of Science and Eng., Yamaguchi Univ., Dr. Eng Abstract This paper defines the characteristics of traditional Manchu residence in Liaoning Province of China, and the ultimate purpose is providing the construction rules and theoretical basis for the retention and inheritance. Through the search of literatures and fieldworks, the rules of housing layout and architectural characteristics of traditional residence are defined. Firstly, site selection principle is setting the backside of house against the mountain and the face of one towards water. Courtyard layout looks simple and one longitudinal axis controls the spatial sequence, green can adjust micro-climate. Secondly, Pocket House that has a heating brick bed named Wanzi Kang is main plan style, so the cross sea chimney stands on the ground by the house sides. Wooden pillars are wrapped in mud wall and ceiling shape is like boat bottom. Keywords: Liaoning Province, Traditional Manchu residence, Architectural style 1. Introduction Paleolithic age. And the National feature of forming Manchu culture is an important part of the a inhabit characteristic is that the Han nationality Chinese culture and its birthplace is Liaoning and national minority live together. Manchu Province. Manchu people have been living in cold population is the second largest in the 55 minorities mountainous area since ancient times and deeply in China. China has 12 Manchu Autonomous influenced by Shamanism, which formed their Counties and Liaoning province includes 7 that original residential style.
    [Show full text]