DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2019 Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2019 Contents ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS 01 Vision & Mission 02 Corporate Profile 04 Chairman’s Message 08 Operational & Financial Highlights 12 Operational & Financial Review 16 Corporate Milestones 18 Board Of Directors 20 Key Management 21 Sustainability & Corporate Social Responsibility Report 39 Corporate Governance 59 Annual Financial Statements 142 Shareholders' Information 144 Notice Of Annual General Meeting 149 Proxy Form IBC Corporate Information OUR VISION To be a leading CPO producer through continuous improvement; focus on productivity, cost efficiency, sustainability and growth. OUR MISSION To enhance shareholder’s value; to improve the benefits and quality of life of our employees; to improve the welfare of the local communities and the environment. BUMITAMA AGRI LTD. ANNUAL REPORT 2019 01 CORPORATE PROFILE Bumitama Agri Ltd. (“Bumitama” or the remains firmly committed to seven RSPO certificates as at 31 “Group”), founded in 1996 and listed sustainability. Bumitama is a member December 2019, and is on track on the Singapore Exchange in 2012, is of the voluntary and internationally- towards securing RSPO certification one of the leading producers of crude recognised Roundtable on Sustainable for all mills and plasma smallholder palm oil (“CPO”) and palm kernel (“PK”) Palm Oil (“RSPO”) non-governmental schemes by 2024. Apart from achieving in Indonesia. The Group is principally organisation, and also adheres to certification for its own plantations engaged in the cultivation of oil palm the mandatory requirements of the and mills, Bumitama actively engages trees, as well as the harvesting and Ministry of Agriculture’s Indonesian and guides independent smallholders processing of fresh palm fruit bunches Sustainable Palm Oil certification towards obtaining such certifications as (“FFB”) into CPO and PK, which are then scheme. Bumitama has achieved part of its social responsibility efforts. sold to refineries in Indonesia. Bumitama manages a total planted area of 187,567 hectares of which 29.3% are allocated for plasma smallholders, located across the Indonesian provinces of Central Kalimantan, West Kalimantan and Riau. The Group’s oil palm trees are relatively matured, with a weighted average age of 10.6 years as at 1 January 2020. With 90.7% of the planted area in the mature category as at 31 December 2019, Bumitama is poised to take advantage of production growth opportunities as the oil palm trees mature and achieve peak production. The Group places strong emphasis on achieving better yields and extraction rates through investments in research and development, and good agricultural practices. To ensure the timely processing of FFBs, and to maintain a high-quality CPO output, Bumitama operates 14 CPO mills that are strategically located in close proximity to its plantations, with a total FFB processing capacity of 5.85 million metric tonnes per annum. The advantageously-located CPO mills also allow the Group to Office reduce transportation costs as well Plantation as its carbon footprint, embodying CPO Mill Bumitama’s sustainability objectives. As one of the first few oil palm growers in Southeast Asia to adopt a “No Deforestation, No Peat and No Exploitation” policy, the Group 02 BUMITAMA AGRI LTD. ANNUAL REPORT 2019 The Group is honoured to have Awards — Most Outstanding Investor Relations (2015, 2016), Best received numerous awards and Company in Singapore for the for Corporate Social Responsibility accolades over the years. These decade (2010-2019), Overall Most (2015, 2016), Best Managed Small include being listed in Forbes Asia’s Outstanding Company in Singapore Cap Company (2016), Best for 200 Best Under a Billion list (2013), (2018), Most Outstanding Company Disclosure and Transparency (2016), Frost & Sullivan Indonesia Excellence in Singapore (Small Cap) (2018, Best for Shareholders’ Rights and Award (2014), The Edge Billion Dollar 2019), Most Outstanding Company Equitable Treatment (2016) and Club — Most Profitable Company in Singapore (Consumer Staple) Best for Responsibilities of (Agriculture Sector) (3 years in a row (2018), Best Overall for Corporate Management and the Board of in 2017, 2018, 2019), Asiamoney Governance (2015, 2016), Best for Directors (2016). BUMITAMA AGRI LTD. ANNUAL REPORT 2019 03 CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE Gunawan H. Lim Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer DEAR SHAREHOLDERS, and Malaysia, and the weak oil palm Financial and Operating production arising from extremely dry Performance On behalf of the Board, I am pleased and hot weather pushed palm prices to present the FY2019 Annual Report above MYR 2,500 per MT. Volatility in For the fiscal year under review, for Bumitama Agri Ltd. (“Bumitama” palm prices has become the new norm, the Group recorded revenue of IDR or “the Group”). deviating from the widely accepted 10 7,691 billion, an 8.2% reduction from year commodity price cycle. IDR 8,377 billion in FY2018. This was The Year in Review largely due to weaker palm oil prices This was also the year that Indonesia attributable to oversupply in the first Sentiment for the year 2019 was held its Presidential Election. The half of the year. Fortunately, there was subdued with the International general Indonesian public and the a respite towards the end of the year Monetary Fund indicating 3.0 business community were especially as prices rose due to a supply shortfall percent global growth, its lowest relieved with the Constitutional Court’s in Indonesia and Malaysia. since 2008-2009. The slowdown decision in June 2019, upholding the was attributed to rising trade and election results, ending months of The Group’s gross profit fell 27.4% geopolitical tensions which took a toll political and economic uncertainty. from FY2018 at IDR 1,733 billion. on business confidence, investment, EBITDA followed closely with a 29.3% global manufacturing and trade. Despite these challenges, we remain drop to IDR 1,694 billion as compared positive on the long-term outlook of to the IDR 2,395 billion of the prior This less than optimal global business the industry. The year 2019 was a year financial year. Meanwhile, net profit environment and expectation of that we demonstrated our resilience fell by 35.1% to IDR 840 billion. Despite growth in palm supply had kept palm by continuing to grow the Group’s the challenges that we faced in 2019, prices subdued in 2019. Prices fell potential to sustainably create value Bumitama remained profitable. to MYR 1,951 per MT in the second for our stakeholders in face of a volatile quarter. Conversely in December 2019, palm oil price, lower production and Bumitama’s balance sheet was healthy the falling palm stock in Indonesia severe weather. while generating strong positive cash 04 BUMITAMA AGRI LTD. ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Despite the immense challenge resulting in a softer performance, Bumitama remains profitable and maintained a healthy balance sheet with a positive cash flow. flow. The Group’s robust financial lower, due to the effects of dry and offers significant long-term upside in position augurs well for strategic hot weather. FFB yield fell by 6.4% to production growth. investment opportunities and 19.1 MT per hectare, while CPO yield provides a safety net for challenges in dipped 4.4% to 4.3 MT per hectare. Maintaining Financial Stability the business environment. However, the extraction rates for both CPO and palm kernel (“PK”) did For the year under review, Bumitama In 2019, the Group has strategically improve with the CPO extraction issued MYR 700 million of Islamic reviewed its investments and initiated rate edging up to 22.7% from Medium-Term Notes. The net the sale of 28% interest in each of 22.1% and the PK extraction rate at proceeds were mainly used to PT Sawit Nabati Agro and PT Berkat 4.7%, up from 4.4%. These higher refinance existing debt. The well- Agro Sawitindo to Oleander Capital extraction rates can be attributed to timed issuance of these notes Resources Pte Ltd., an associate of IOI improvements in our mills processes. allowed us access to funding at a Corporation Berhad. This divestment competitive rate. As sukuk valuation will allow the Group to refocus We have expanded the Group’s is based on the value of assets its resources and attention on its total planted area by 1.3% or 2,402 backing them, it is a testament to subsidiaries. hectares to 187,567 hectares. our strong financial position. In However, going forward, expansion addition, RAM Ratings has reaffirmed The Group’s internal FFB production with large hectarage will be Bumitama’s AA3 rating with a stable stayed almost flat at 3.3 million metric challenging given the country’s outlook. tonnes (“MT”) in 2019. This accounts moratorium on the issuance of for 71.6% of total production with new permits for plantations. As of Share Buyback external FFB production at 1.3 million 1 January 2020, the Group’s oil palm MT. trees have a weighted average age In connection with 2019 Share of 10.6 years with 7,000 hectares Buyback Mandate (as of 19 March From a yield perspective, both FFB of planted area reaching maturity. 2020), the Group bought back and crude palm oil (“CPO”) yield were Our relatively young palm age profile 2,107,800 shares representing 0.12% BUMITAMA AGRI LTD. ANNUAL REPORT 2019 05 CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE of the total outstanding shares. This will form collaborations with expert Coronavirus outbreak, the US-China programme underlines the Group’s organisations and local communities. trade war, uncertainty in crude oil confidence in the prospect of our We will continue to innovate and due to breakdown of pact between business. improve towards the achievement of Russia and OPEC, and a more intense our sustainable development goals. dry season due to a possible El Nino Our Commitment to Sustainability effect) can all have a huge impact on Dividends the global economy and the palm This past year represented industry.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acop Digest 2012 / 2013
    ACOP DIGEST 2012 / 2013 A Snapshot of RSPO Members’ Annual Communications of Progress DISCLAIMER EDITED BY: This material and accompanying data is based on submissions from RSPO members Communications Division, which has not been independently verified and is provided by the RSPO and authors RSPO Secretariat without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. By making use of this material you do so at your own risk and you accept that the author shall not be liable for any claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses of any kind arising. CONCEPT & DESIGN: Data from this report can be explored interactively on the RSPO website: Catalyze Sustainability Communications www.rspo.org/en/acop_2012-2013 OPENING ADDRESS he RSPO is once again pleased to publish the RSPO ACOP Digest (RAD) prior to RT11 based upon the data collated from the Annual Communications T of Progress (ACOP) reports that were submitted by its members. There was a significant increase in report submissions in tandem with the increased number of members in the RSPO, thus continuing the ascending inclination of compliancy towards the requirement to submit the ACOP reports. For this year, as per the Code of Conduct, only Ordinary and Affiliate Members that joined RSPO before the first of June 2012 were obligated to submit their respective ACOP reports. Members from all seven stakeholder categories were required to submit their ACOP 2012/2013 reports with the questions varying for each category to appropriately reflect the actual activities, distinctive contributions and level of commitment of each organization towards sustainable palm oil. The Time-Bound Plan (TBP) has always been an essential aspect within the ACOP process which will enable us to gauge the commitment by key stakeholders towards 100 percent RSPO certified sustainable palm oil, providing an indication on the pace of the RSPO toward achieving our vision of transforming markets to make sustainable palm oil the norm.
    [Show full text]
  • How Dirty Palm Oil Is Feeding the Climate and Extinction
    DYING FOR A COOKIE HOW DIRTY PALM OIL IS FEEDING THE CLIMATE AND EXTINCTION CRISIS ‘Wearetakingstepstoensurethatthepalmoilwebuyisproduced onlegallyheldland,doesnotleadtodeforestationorlossofpeat land,respectshumanrights,includinglandrights,anddoesnot useforcedorchildlabor.’ Mondelēz International Palm Oil Action Plan, June 2014 11 December 2016, PT Ladang Sawit Mas, 1°32’20.856”S 110°18’58.122”E: ©Ifansasti/Greenpeace Cover and right: March 2013, PT Ladang Sawit Mas:One of several orangutan rescue attempts by International Animal Rescue Indonesia in the Bumitama oil palm concession. ‘Theunsustainable useofnatural resourceshas causedadramatic declineofBornean orangutans[...]Our findingssuggest thatmorethan 100,000individuals havebeenlostinthe 16yearsbetween 1999and2015.’ Maria Voigt, researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, September 2017 CONTENTS CALLING TIME ON MONDELēZ 1 EYES WIDE SHUT: HOW CONSUMER BRANDS AND THE RSPO SUPPORT THE TRADE IN DIRTY PALM OIL 2 BUMITAMA AND ITS DIRTY SECRETS 5 Bumitama’s ownership, structure and landbank 4 Quantifying Bumitama’s forest loss liability 7 Bumitama’s and IOI’s response 7 CRUNCH TIME FOR MONDELĒZ AND THE PALM OIL SECTOR 8 BUMITAMA’S LAUNDERING OF A TOXIC LEGACY 12 Associated parties 13 Citro Utomo 13 Djoni Rusmin and Tommy Santoso 14 Nita Gartika and Janta Halim 16 CASE STUDIES 20 PT Gunajaya Harapan Lestari (PT GHL), West Kalimantan 20 PT Hatiprima Agro (PT HPA), Central Kalimantan 22 PT Golden Youth Plantation Indonesia (PT GYP) and PT Ladang Sawit Mas (PT LSM),
    [Show full text]
  • The Green Tigers
    The Green Tigers Which Southeast Asian Companies Will Prosper in the New Age of Forest Conservation? UPDATE OCTOBER 2014 Which Southeast Asian companies will prosper in the new age of forest conservation? © DeanBirinyi / istockphoto.com THE GREEN TIGERS Which Southeast Asian companies will prosper in the new age of forest conservation? By Glenn Hurowitz Southeast Asia’s economies are roaring. The rise of the so-called “Asian tiger” economies has been one of the most profound developments in global business over the past half-century. But even as the region grows, the manner of its growth is imperiling its future prosperity. Too much of Asia’s growth has relied upon defor- estation and pollution. Instead of pursuing lasting development, many countries and companies in the region have favored “spreadsheet development” that prioritizes goosing national gross domestic prod- uct numbers at the expense of making a positive impact on the communities where it occurs. Southeast Asia is by no means unique in pursuing this model, but it is possibly the place where it is followed most energetically—and with the most visible consequences. Too many companies are still putting the region’s environment and economy at risk through continued deforestation and other irresponsible practices. But some countries and companies are choosing a different path. They are adapting to the revolutionized global market by evolving to ensure that their growth does not come at the expense of forests. These are the Green Tigers – and they are set to roar for decades to come. There is great urgency behind this corporate evolution: Deforestation for palm oil and paper plantations has turned the region into a tinderbox.
    [Show full text]
  • The Green Tigers
    The Green Tigers Which Southeast Asian Companies Will Prosper in the New Age of Forest Conservation? SEPTEMBER 2014 Which Southeast Asian companies will prosper in the new age of forest conservation? © DeanBirinyi / istockphoto.com THE GREEN TIGERS Which Southeast Asian companies will prosper in the new age of forest conservation? By Glenn Hurowitz Southeast Asia’s economies are roaring. The rise of the so-called “Asian tiger” economies has been one of the most profound developments in global business over the past half-century. But even as the region grows, the manner of its growth is imperiling its future prosperity. Too much of Asia’s growth has relied upon defor- estation and pollution. Instead of pursuing lasting development, many countries and companies in the region have favored “spreadsheet development” that prioritizes goosing national gross domestic prod- uct numbers at the expense of making a positive impact on the communities where it occurs. Southeast Asia is by no means unique in pursuing this model, but it is possibly the place where it is followed most energetically—and with the most visible consequences. Too many companies are still putting the region’s environment and economy at risk through continued deforestation and other irresponsible practices. But some countries and companies are choosing a different path. They are adapting to the revolutionized global market by evolving to ensure that their growth does not come at the expense of forests. These are the Green Tigers – and they are set to roar for decades to come. There is great urgency behind this corporate evolution: Deforestation for palm oil and paper plantations has turned the region into a tinderbox.
    [Show full text]
  • Unilever Palm Oil Mill List
    2017 Palm Oil Mills No. Mill Name Parent Company RSPO Certified Country Province District Latitude Longitude 1 ABDI BUDI MULIA PKS 1 AATHI BAGAWATHI MANUFACTURING SDN BHD No Indonesia Sumatera Utara Labuhan Batu 2.0512694 100.252339 2 ABEDON OIL MILL KRETAM HOLDING BERHAD Yes Malaysia Sabah Kinabatangan 5.312106 117.9741 3 ACEITES CIMARRONES SAS ACEITES S.A. Yes Colombia Meta Puerto Rico 3.035593889 -73.11146556 4 ACEITES MANUELITA YAGUARITO CI BIOCOSTA Yes Colombia Meta San Carlos de Guaroa 3.882933 -73.341206 5 ACEITES MORICHAL CI BIOCOSTA No Colombia Meta San Carlos de Guaroa 3.92985 -73.242775 6 ADELA POM FELDA No Malaysia Johor Kota Tinggi 1.552768 104.1873 7 ADHYAKSA DHARMASATYA ADHYAKSA DHARMASATYA No Indonesia Kalimantan Tengah Kotawaringin Timur -1.588931 112.861883 8 ADITYA AGROINDO AGRINDO No Indonesia Kalimantan Barat Ketapang -0.476029 110.151418 9 ADOLINA PTPN IV No Indonesia Sumatera Utara Serdang Bedagai 3.568533 98.94805 10 ADONG MILL WOODMAN GROUP No Malaysia Sarawak Miri 4.541035 114.119098 11 AEK BATU WILMAR No Indonesia Sumatera Utara Labuhan Batu 1.850583 100.1457 12 AEK LOBA SOCFIN INDONESIA Yes Indonesia Sumatera Utara Asahan 2.651389 99.617778 13 AEK NABARA RAJA GARUDA MAS Yes Indonesia Sumatera Utara Labuhan Batu 1.999722222 99.93972222 14 AEK NABARA SELATAN PTPN III Yes Indonesia Sumatera Utara Labuhan Batu 2.058056 99.955278 15 AEK RASO PTPN III Yes Indonesia Sumatera Utara Labuhan Batu 1.703883 100.172217 16 AEK SIBIRONG MAJU INDO RAYA No Indonesia Sumatera Utara Tapanuli Selatan 1.409317 98.85825 17 AEK SIGALA-GALA
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Business Potential and Major Players of CPO Industry In
    Hubungi Kami : 021 31930 108 021 31930 109 021 31930 070 [email protected] il palm industry is feasible to be decided as a perform plantation expansions and add total oil palm plants strategic commodity since it has given great (PKS) in order to raise the production capacity. Great role is O contribution towards the state income, to provide also played by PTPN and farmers’ oil palm plantations. job opportunities to 4 million heads of family or more than 16 million people. Therefore, Indonesian government Foreign exchanges produced from oil palm industry can actually should have provided its support for this business be increased more if Indonesia is able to raise oil palm advancement and protection from the attack of other productivity which is considered to be low since there are many parties. As the world largest producer of Crude Palm Oil old oil palm trees which need regeneration. Oil palm with production of 32 million tons and Palm Kernel Oil regeneration program through the assistance of fine seedling (PKO) of 3 million tons, Indonesia has a vast role to supply will produce additional value which is estimated to reach world’s foods and energy. Rp. 125 trillion per annum. Based on a research of CDMI that in the last six years Until 2017 from some 4.7 million hectares of farmers’ oil palm (2012 – 2017) the export of CPO and PKO kept on plantations, some 2.5 million hectares were less productive. increasing with fluctuating prices. In 2012, the export of Realizing this condition, the government has committed to CPO and PKO reached 20.30 million tons valued US$ 19.11 assist the farmers through the financing provided by Plantation billion while the export of CPO and PKO in 2017 amounted Fund Management Body (BPDP) of Oil Palm reaching Rp.
    [Show full text]
  • NDPE Policies Cover 83% of Palm Oil Refineries; Implementation at 72%
    NDPE Policies Cover 83% of Palm Oil Refineries; Implementation at 72% April 2020 Chain Reaction Research is a coalition Palm oil refiners are a strategic bottleneck in the global supply chain. Since of Aidenvironment, Profundo and Climate Advisers. 2014, the largest refiners have adopted No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation (NDPE) policies, the strongest private instrument to cut the direct Contact: link between deforestation and palm oil. Refiners commit to NDPE policies that cover their own plantations and the plantations of their third-party suppliers. www.chainreactionresearch.com; This market mechanism functions best when the entire industry follows [email protected] commitments. However, non-cooperating refiners continue to leak unsustainable palm oil into the market. Authors: Albert ten Kate, Aidenvironment Key Findings: Barbara Kuepper, Profundo Matt Piotrowski, Climate Advisers • As of April 2020, NDPE policies cover 83 percent of palm oil refining With contributions from: capacity in Indonesia and Malaysia. In November 2017, this percentage Tim Steinweg, Aidenvironment stood at 74 percent. The increase is the result of six company groups with Gerard Rijk, Profundo large refining capacity adopting NDPE policies. • Because of weak implementation, effective NDPE coverage falls to 72 percent. Due to lagging transparency and grievance processes, three of the eleven largest refiners in Indonesia and Malaysia remain part of the leakage market. • The seven largest leakage refiners in Indonesia and Malaysia are FGV Holdings, Permata Hijau Group, Salim Group, BEST Group, Tunas Baru Lampung, Darmex Agro and the Wings Group. In India, the world’s largest importer of crude palm oil, there are three leakage refiners: Emami Agrotech, Patanjali Ayurved and Gokul Agro Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • RM New Entries 2016 Mar.Pdf
    International Plant Nutrition Institute Regional Office • Southeast Asia Date: March 31, 2016 Page: 1 of 88 New Entries to IPNI Library as References Roberts T. L. 2008. Improving Nutrient Use Efficiency. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 32:177-182. Reference ID: 21904 Notes: #21904e Abstract: Public interest and awareness of the need for improving nutrient use efficiency is great, but nutrient use efficiency is easily misunderstood. Four indices of nutrient use efficiency are reviewed and an example of different applications of the terminology show that the same data set might be used to calculate a fertilizer N efficiency of 21% or 100%. Fertilizer N recovery efficiencies from researcher managed experiments for major grain crops range from 46% to 65%, compared to on-farm N recovery efficiencies of 20% to 40%. Fertilizer use efficiency can be optimized by fertilizer best management practices that apply nutrients at the right rate, time, and place. The highest nutrient use efficiency always occurs at the lower parts of the yield response curve, where fertilizer inputs are lowest, but effectiveness of fertilizers in increasing crop yields and optimizing farmer profitability should not be sacrificed for the sake of efficiency alone. There must be a balance between optimal nutrient use efficiency and optimal crop productivity. Souza L. F. D.and D. H. Reinhardt. 2015. Pineapple. Pages 179-201 IPO. Reference ID: 21905 Notes: #21905e Abstract: Pineapple is one of the tropical fruits in greatest demand on the international market, with world production in 2004 of 16.1 million mt. Of this total, Asia produces 51% (8.2 million mt), with Thailand (12%) and the Philippines (11%) the two most productive countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Bumitama Agri Ltd. MEDIUM RISK
    INITIATING COVERAGE 15 October 2014 Bumitama Agri Ltd. MEDIUM RISK Oil palm plantation ISIN: SG2E67980267| SGX: P8Z | Bloomberg: BAL:SP BUMITAMA AGRI LTD. MEDIUM RISK Summary Warding off Sustainability Risk This Chain Reaction Research (CRR) report analyzes the financial risk profile of Bumitama Agri Ltd. (BAL:SP), a rapidly growing palm oil company. We looked at sustainability risks associated with the group’s 204,000 hectare (ha) land bank in Kalimantan, Indonesia – an area that the company identifies as available for plantation development. Detailed analysis of 16 of the group’s 18 plantation subsidiaries shows that Bumitama has been involved in significant deforestation, peatland development and legal irregularities since the group entered the plantation business in 1998. Continuation of such practices places the group at serious risk of losing its two major customers. Wilmar International and Golden Agri-Resources (GAR) together purchase approximately 90 percent of Bumitama’s palm oil supply. As of early 2014, both companies have adopted stringent sourcing policies that disqualify third-party suppliers who engage in deforestation, peat development and social exploitation. In the months since, Bumitama has taken several steps that may mitigate some of the worst risks. In this report, CRR reviews how Bumitama accumulated its sustainability risk profile over the years, and assesses the potential financial consequences should the group fail to duly address its sustainability risk exposure. An earlier version of this report was sent to Bumitama Agri for review, and this final report integrates information from its response. Contested Land Bank: 41% At the core of our Sustainability Risk Assessment (SRA) is an analysis of how much of a company’s land bank may be “contested land” – i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • PRINCIPLES and CRITERIA for Sustainable Palm Oil Production 2018
    RSPO Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA For Sustainable Palm Oil Production 2018 The Indonesia National Interpretation 1 Draft 1 – National Interpretation RSPO Principles & Criteria 2018 Preface Sustainable palm oil production comprises legal, economically viable, environmentally appropriate and socially beneficial management and operations. This is delivered through the application of the following set of Principles and Criteria ("P&C") herein and the accompanying Indicators and Guidance. The first set of RSPO P&C, Indicators and Guidance (RSPO P&C 2007) have been applied since November 2007. These had been subject to trial implementation from November 2005 to November 2007 and, in a number of countries, to a subsequent process of National Interpretation process (NI). After five years of application by RSPO members, RSPO P&C 2007 were reviewed in 2012-2013, leading to the RSPO P&C 2013. After a five years of application, RSPO P&C 2013 were reviewed and revised in 2017-2018 by the RSPO Principles and Criteria Review Task Force. The objective of each review and revision is to improve the relevance and effectiveness of the Principles and Criteria for RSPO members, and in achieving the shared vision and mission to make sustainable palm oil the norm. More specifically, this most recent revision sought to align the Principles and Criteria with the RSPO Theory of Change (ToC) and increase accessibility by making so these Principles and Criteria are more relevant and practical. The review process went beyond International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling (ISEAL) best practices, including two public consultation periods of 60 days each, and with 17 physical consultation workshops in 10 countries around the world, as well as 6 physical Task Force meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Illegalities in Forest Clearance for Large-Scale Commercial Plantations
    Indonesia: Illegalities in Forest Clearance for Large-Scale Commercial Plantations Eric Wakker, Aidenvironment Asia June 2014 With Support from: Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Oil Palm ................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Project History and Key Developing Institutions ................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Major Companies Involved ................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 Forest Loss ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Main Expansion Areas ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 2.5 Future Expansion Plans ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Industrial Tree Plantations .................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 History ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Buku Prospektus Astra Agro Lestari (Indonesia).Pdf
    PENAWARAN UMUM TERBATAS (PUT I) PT ASTRA AGRO LESTARI TBK KEPADA PARA PEMEGANG SAHAM PERSEROANDALAM RANGKA PENERBITAN HAK MEMESAN EFEK TERLEBIH DAHULU (HMETD) TAHUN 2016 HAK MEMESAN EFEK TERLEBIH DAHULU (HMETD) TAHUN PENERBITAN PEMEGANG SAHAM PERSEROANDALAM RANGKA PARA TBK KEPADA AGRO LESTARI ASTRA (PUT I) PT UMUM TERBATAS PENAWARAN JADWAL Tanggal Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa (RUPSLB) : 11 April 2016 'LVWULEXVL6HUWL¿NDW%XNWL+0(7' : 10 Juni 2016 7DQJJDO3HUQ\DWDDQ3HQGDIWDUDQ+0(7'PHQMDGL(IHNWLI : 0HL 7DQJJDO3HQFDWDWDQ6DKDPGL%XUVD(IHN,QGRQHVLD : 13 Juni 2016 7DQJJDO7HUDNKLU3HQFDWDWDQ Recording Date XQWXNPHPSHUROHK+0(7' : 9 Juni 2016 3HULRGH3HUGDJDQJDQ+0(7' : 13 - 17 Juni 2016 7DQJJDO7HUDNKLU3HUGDJDQJDQ6DKDP'HQJDQ+0(7' &XP5LJKW 3HULRGH3HQGDIWDUDQ3HPED\DUDQGDQ3HODNVDQDDQ+0(7' : 13 - 17 Juni 2016 3DVDU5HJXOHUGDQ3DVDU1HJRVLDVL : 6 Juni 2016 3HULRGH3HQ\HUDKDQ6DKDP+DVLO3HODNVDQDDQ+0(7' : 15 - 21 Juni 2016 Pasar Tunai : 9 Juni 2016 7DQJJDO7HUDNKLU3HPED\DUDQ3HPHVDQDQ6DKDP7DPEDKDQ : 21 Juni 2016 7DQJJDO0XODL3HUGDJDQJDQ6DKDP7DQSD+0(7' ([5LJKW 7DQJJDO3HQMDWDKDQ : 22 Juni 2016 3DVDU5HJXOHUGDQ3DVDU1HJRVLDVL : 7 Juni 2016 7DQJJDO3HPEHOL6LDJD0HODNVDQDNDQ.HZDMLEDQQ\D : 23 Juni 2016 Pasar Tunai : 10 Juni 2016 Tanggal Pengembalian Uang Pemesanan : 24 Juni 2016 OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN (“OJK”) TIDAK MEMBERIKAN PERNYATAAN MENYETUJUI ATAU TIDAK MENYETUJUI EFEK INI, TIDAK JUGA MENYATAKAN KEBENARAN ATAU KECUKUPAN ISI PROSPEKTUS INI. SETIAP PERNYATAAN YANG BERTENTANGAN DENGAN HAL-HAL TERSEBUT ADALAH PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM. PROSPEKTUS INI PENTING DAN PERLU
    [Show full text]