2019-2020 Biennial Budget

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2019-2020 Biennial Budget City of Sammamish, Washington 2019-2020 Biennial Budget Sammamish Farmer’s Market Table of Contents INTRODUCTORY SECTION Budget Award ............................................................................................................................................ 2 City Council ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Staff .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Organization Chart .................................................................................................................................... 5 Boards and Commissions ......................................................................................................................... 6 Community Profile ..................................................................................................................................... 7 BUDGET MESSAGE Budget Message ..................................................................................................................................... 11 BUDGET PROCESS Budget Process and Policies ...................................................................................................................... 17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Summary of Sources and Uses .............................................................................................................. 31 Revenues ................................................................................................................................................ 44 Fund Balances ........................................................................................................................................ 55 Salaries and Benefits .............................................................................................................................. 58 Authorized Full-time Equivalent Positions ............................................................................................... 60 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET General Fund Revenue and Expenditure Summary ............................................................................... 65 City Council ............................................................................................................................................. 67 City Manager ........................................................................................................................................... 69 Administration Division ........................................................................................................................ 72 Communication Division ...................................................................................................................... 74 Legal Services ......................................................................................................................................... 75 Finance Department ................................................................................................................................ 77 Administrative Services Department ....................................................................................................... 80 Administrative Division ........................................................................................................................ 84 City Clerk Division ............................................................................................................................... 85 Human Resources Division ................................................................................................................. 86 Social and Human Services Department ................................................................................................ 87 Facilities Department .............................................................................................................................. 89 Fire Services ........................................................................................................................................... 92 Police Services ......................................................................................................................................... 94 Emergency Management ......................................................................................................................... 97 Public Works Department ....................................................................................................................... 99 Administration Division ...................................................................................................................... 102 Engineering Division ......................................................................................................................... 103 Community Development Department .................................................................................................. 105 Planning Division ............................................................................................................................... 109 Building Division ................................................................................................................................ 111 Permit Center Division ....................................................................................................................... 113 Parks and Recreation Department ........................................................................................................ 115 Administration Division ...................................................................................................................... 120 Arts and Culture Division .................................................................................................................. 121 Planning Division ............................................................................................................................... 122 Recreation Division ........................................................................................................................... 123 Maintenance Division ........................................................................................................................ 125 Non-departmental.................................................................................................................................. 127 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND OPERATING BUDGET Street Fund ............................................................................................................................................ 130 Administration Division ...................................................................................................................... 135 Engineering Division ......................................................................................................................... 136 Maintenance Division ........................................................................................................................ 138 DEBT SERVICE FUND OPERATING BUDGET Debt Service Fund................................................................................................................................. 141 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS SUMMARY BY FUND General Government CIP Fund ............................................................................................................ 143 Parks CIP Fund ..................................................................................................................................... 145 Transportation CIP Fund ....................................................................................................................... 150 ENTERPRISE FUNDS SUMMARY BY FUND Surface Water Management Fund ........................................................................................................ 156 Administration Division ...................................................................................................................... 161 Engineering Division ......................................................................................................................... 162 Maintenance Division ........................................................................................................................ 164 Surface Water Management Capital Fund ............................................................................................ 166 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS SUMMARY BY FUND Equipment Rental and Replacement Fund ........................................................................................... 172 Technology Replacement Fund ............................................................................................................ 175 Risk Management Fund ........................................................................................................................ 179 DETAILED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES 2019-2020 Adopted Budget Ordinance ................................................................................................ 182 Table A-Total Adopted 2019-2020 Budget ........................................................................................... 184 Line Item Budget ................................................................................................................................... 185 LONG TERM FINANCIAL FORECAST ..................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Historic Context Statement City of Benicia February 2011 Benicia, CA
    Historic Context Statement City of Benicia February 2011 Benicia, CA Prepared for City of Benicia Department of Public Works & Community Development Prepared by page & turnbull, inc. 1000 Sansome Street, Ste. 200, San Francisco CA 94111 415.362.5154 / www.page-turnbull.com Benicia Historic Context Statement FOREWORD “Benicia is a very pretty place; the situation is well chosen, the land gradually sloping back from the water, with ample space for the spread of the town. The anchorage is excellent, vessels of the largest size being able to tie so near shore as to land goods without lightering. The back country, including the Napa and Sonoma Valleys, is one of the finest agriculture districts in California. Notwithstanding these advantages, Benicia must always remain inferior in commercial advantages, both to San Francisco and Sacramento City.”1 So wrote Bayard Taylor in 1850, less than three years after Benicia’s founding, and another three years before the city would—at least briefly—serve as the capital of California. In the century that followed, Taylor’s assessment was echoed by many authors—that although Benicia had all the ingredients for a great metropolis, it was destined to remain in the shadow of others. Yet these assessments only tell a half truth. While Benicia never became the great commercial center envisioned by its founders, its role in Northern California history is nevertheless one that far outstrips the scale of its geography or the number of its citizens. Benicia gave rise to the first large industrial works in California, hosted the largest train ferries ever constructed, and housed the West Coast’s primary ordnance facility for over 100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • She-Loves-Me-2020-Village-Theatre
    JANUARY 2020 Artistic Directors: Mara Vinson & Oleg Gorboulev Photography Alante Credit: Photo Oba-Muschiana & Ryan Sims, Yuka The Sleeping Beauty January 2020 | Volume 19, No. 3 Join us for this beautiful fairy-tale! Choreography by Mara Vinson & Oleg Gorboulev after Sleeping BeautyThe Marius Petipa, music by Pyotr Tchaikovsky. EDMONDS Center for the Arts March 28, 2pm March 29, 5pm EVERETT Performing Arts Center April 4, 2pm TICKETS OlympicBallet.Org 425-774-7570 Funded in part by the Made possible in part City of Edmonds Arts by assistance from the Commission Tourisim Snohomish County Hotel- Promotion Fund through Motel Tax Fund. City of Edmonds181220 Lodging Crossroads Village Theater 4.75x4.875 f.pdf 1 12/20/18 10:24 AM PAUL HEPPNER President Tax Funds MIKE HATHAWAY Senior Vice President KAJSA PUCKETT Vice President, Sales & Marketing GENAY GENEREUX Accounting & Office Manager Production SUSAN PETERSON Vice President, Production JENNIFER SUGDEN Assistant Production Manager ANA ALVIRA, STEVIE VAN BRONKHORST Production Artists and Graphic Designers Sales MARILYN KALLINS, TERRI REED San Francisco/Bay Area Account Executives Stage Manager BRIEANNA HANSEN, SHERRI JARVEY, ANN MANNING Seattle Area ANNE L. HITT* Account Executives CAROL YIP Sales Coordinator Marketing SHAUN SWICK Brand & Creative Manager CIARA CAYA Marketing Coordinator Encore Media Group 425 North 85th Street • Seattle, WA 98103 800.308.2898 • 206.443.0445 [email protected] encoremediagroup.com Encore Arts Programs and Encore Stages are published monthly by Encore Media Group to serve performing arts events in the San Francisco Bay Area and Greater Seattle Area. All rights reserved. ©2019 Encore Media Group. Reproduction without written permission is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • This City of Ours
    THIS CITY OF OURS By J. WILLIS SAYRE For the illustrations used in this book the author expresses grateful acknowledgment to Mrs. Vivian M. Carkeek, Charles A. Thorndike and R. M. Kinnear. Copyright, 1936 by J. W. SAYRE rot &?+ *$$&&*? *• I^JJMJWW' 1 - *- \£*- ; * M: . * *>. f* j*^* */ ^ *** - • CHIEF SEATTLE Leader of his people both in peace and war, always a friend to the whites; as an orator, the Daniel Webster of his race. Note this excerpt, seldom surpassed in beauty of thought and diction, from his address to Governor Stevens: Why should I mourn at the untimely fate of my people? Tribe follows tribe, and nation follows nation, like the waves of the sea. It is the order of nature and regret is useless. Your time of decay may be distant — but it will surely come, for even the White Man whose God walked and talked with him as friend with friend cannot be exempt from the common destiny. We may be brothers after all. Let the White Man be just and deal kindly with my people, for the dead are not powerless. Dead — I say? There is no death. Only a change of worlds. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE 1. BELIEVE IT OR NOT! 1 2. THE ROMANCE OF THE WATERFRONT . 5 3. HOW OUR RAILROADS GREW 11 4. FROM HORSE CARS TO MOTOR BUSES . 16 5. HOW SEATTLE USED TO SEE—AND KEEP WARM 21 6. INDOOR ENTERTAINMENTS 26 7. PLAYING FOOTBALL IN PIONEER PLACE . 29 8. STRANGE "IFS" IN SEATTLE'S HISTORY . 34 9. HISTORICAL POINTS IN FIRST AVENUE . 41 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Legal Counsel
    OPINIONS OF THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CONSISTING OF SELECTED MEMORANDUM OPINIONS ADVISING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, AND OTHER EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN RELATION TO THEIR OFFICIAL DUTIES EDITOR Nathan A. Forrester VOLUME 26 2002 WASHINGTON 2012 227-329 VOL_26_PROOF.pdf 1 10/22/12 11:13 AM 227-329 VOL_26_PROOF.pdf 2 10/22/12 11:13 AM Attorney General John D. Ashcroft Assistant Attorney General Office of Legal Counsel Jay S. Bybee Deputy Assistant Attorneys General Office of Legal Counsel Sheldon Bradshaw Joan L. Larsen Patrick F. Philbin M. Edward Whelan III John C. Yoo iii 227-329 VOL_26_PROOF.pdf 3 10/22/12 11:13 AM OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL Attorney-Advisers (2002) Jonathan G. Cedarbaum Jeffery P. Kehne Paul P. Colborn Jennifer L. Koester Robert. J. Delahunty Daniel L. Koffsky John A. Eisenberg Caroline D. Krass Curtis E. Gannon Martin S. Lederman Rosemary A. Hart Herman Marcuse James C. Ho Nick Quinn Rosenkranz Clare Huntington Leslie A. Simon Gregory F. Jacob George C. Smith Steffen J. Johnson Robert W. Werner iv 227-329 VOL_26_PROOF.pdf 4 10/22/12 11:13 AM FOREWORD The Attorney General has directed the Office of Legal Counsel to publish selected opinions on an annual basis for the convenience of the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches of the government, and of the professional bar and the general public. The first twenty-five volumes of opinions published covered the years 1977 through 2001. The present volume covers 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • OIE) Indian Education Professional Development Program (84.299B
    The Office of Indian Education (OIE) Indian Education Professional Development Program (84.299B) State: Arizona State LEA Average Percent of AIAN Students: 6.94 Source: 2018-19 Common Core of Data Local Education Agency (School District) Universe Survey Data Number Total Percent of AIAN Student of AIAN LEA Name LEA City Students Population Students A Center For Creative Education Cottonwood 2 65 3.08 Academy Del Sol Inc. Tucson 14 792 1.77 Academy Of Building Industries Inc. Fort Mohave 3 119 2.52 Academy Of Mathematics And Science Inc. Phoenix 2 1,132 0.18 Academy Of Mathematics And Science Inc. Tucson 11 528 2.08 Academy Of Mathematics And Science South Inc. Tucson 5 1,475 0.34 Academy Of Tucson Inc. Tucson 5 632 0.79 Academy With Community Partners Inc Mesa 3 135 2.22 Accelerated Elementary And Secondary Schools Tucson 0 167 0.00 Accelerated Learning Center Inc. Phoenix 3 179 1.68 Acclaim Charter School Phoenix Data Not Available Acorn Montessori Charter School Prescott Valley 9 488 1.84 Agua Fria Union High School District Avondale 61 7,979 0.76 Aguila Elementary District Aguila 0 163 0.00 Aibt Non-Profit Charter High School - Phoenix Phoenix 3 101 2.97 Aibt Non-Profit Charter High School Inc. Phoenix 0 14 0.00 Ajo Unified District Ajo 28 454 6.17 Akimel O Otham Pee Posh Charter School Inc. Coolidge 15 16 93.75 Akimel O'otham Pee Posh Charter School Inc. Coolidge 10 12 83.33 Alhambra Elementary District Phoenix 221 12,551 1.76 All Aboard Charter School Phoenix 1 134 0.75 Allen-Cochran Enterprises Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Lake Washington Sockeye Salmon: What Can Genetic Data Tell
    The Origins of Lake Washington Sockeye Salmon: What Can Genetic Data Tell Us? Eric C. Anderson Interdisciplinary Program in Quantitative Ecology and Resource Management Box 351720, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 Currently, four well-established populations of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) spawn in the Lake Washington basin. These include beach spawners (primarily at Pleasure Point), and populations spawning in the Cedar River, Issaquah Creek, and the Sammamish River tributaries (principally Bear Creek). The origin of the Bear Creek population (i.e., native or non-native) is uncertain. Historical records of sockeye in Bear Creek are limited, and the genetic data, though suggestive of a native origin, are not conclusive. Early reports (Evermann and Meek 1898; Rathbun 1900; Evermann and Goldsborough 1907) indicate that O. nerka spawned in Lake Washington’s tributaries at the turn of the century. Most of these reports are now believed to be of kokanee, the nonanadromous form of O. nerka (Shaklee et al. 1996). The presence of kokanee suggests that anadromous sockeye must have inhabited the basin at some time in the past (Wood and Foote 1996), perhaps even in the early 1900’s. Nonetheless, these populations may not have survived the dramatic changes to the watershed following the 1916 completion of the Lake Washington ship canal, which permanently dried the lake’s former outlet (the Black River, a tributary of the Duwamish) and established the Ship Canal as the watershed’s only link to the Pacic. Such changes might reasonably have had negative impacts on any contemporary, anadromous sockeye populations, and, indeed, the few historical records from that period suggest that anadromous sockeye were not present in the Lake Washington drainage during the 1920’s and ‘30’s (Cobb 1927; Rounsefell and Kelez 1938).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Sammamish Water Quality Response to Land Use Change
    Lake Sammamish Water Quality Response to Land Use Change December 2014 Alternate Formats Available Cover photo: Top right corner: 2013 Pictometry. The dataset consists of tiled orthogonal imagery produced from nadir images captured by Pictometry International. This ortho-mosaic is a visualization product and is not intended or valid for authoritative or definitive use. Bottom left corner: 1936 Aerial Photos for western King County panchromatic imagery. The source is the original hardboard-mounted aerial prints. The original 0.5 foot pixel resolution was resampled to 1 foot pixel. The purpose of the imagery is historical comparison and archiving original documents. Lake Sammamish Water Quality Response to Land Use Change Submitted by: Eugene B. Welch Emeritus Professor, University of Washington Consulting Limnologist Debra Bouchard King County Science and Technical Support Section Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks Seattle, WA 98104 Lake Sammamish Water Quality Response to Land Use Change Acknowledgements Water quality sampling and analysis was conducted by the King County Environmental Laboratory. We would like to thank Jeff Droker and Jean Power for their help sifting through boxes of historical data records and for describing detailed sampling protocols. We are also grateful to Katherine Bourbonais for her assistance coordinating our data needs and making sure our questions were answered. We would like to thank staff in the King County Science and Technical Support Section for their help. Rachael Gravon and Andrew Miller provided help with data analysis. Sally Abella, Curtis DeGasperi, Jim Simmonds, and Kate O’Laughlin provided significant contributions with their technical review. A special thank-you goes to Jonathan Frodge with Save Lake Sammamish for his technical review.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthquakes 1932
    UNITED. STATES EARTHQUAKES 1932 SERIAL No. 563 arthiento! Phyks U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY - WASHINGTON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Daniel C. Roper, Secretary COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY R. S. PATTON, Director Serial No. 563 UNITED STATES EARTHQUAKES 1932 BY FRANK NEUMANN Mathematician UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1934 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. --- Price S cents CONTENTS Page Introduction i Earthquake activity in the various States 4 Northeastern region 5 Eastern region 5 Central region 5 Western mountain region 5 California and western Nevada 6 Washington and Oregon 15 Alaska 17 Hawaiian Islands 18 Philippine Islands 18 Puerto Rico 18 Panama Canal Zone 18 Instrumental reports 19 Summary of instrumental results 19 Miscellaneous seismological activity 21 ILLUSTRATIONS Pig. Earthquake epicenters, 1932 4 Area affected by the Nevada earthquake of December 20 10-11 Areas affected by the California shocks of June 6 and 14, July 25, October 24, and November 3 14 Areas affected by the shocks of January 5, July 17, and August 6 16 n UNITED STATES EARTHQUAKES, 1932 INTRODUCTION This publication is a summary of earthquake activity in the United States and the regions under its jurisdiction for the calendaryear 1932.The period up to1927for the United States is covered (for all except minor earthquakes), by Special Publication No.149of this bureau, Earthquake History of the United States Exclusive of the Pacific Region, and by several publications for the Pacificregion. These include the Holden and McAdie catalogs' anda forthcoming publication of the Seismological Society of America which will extend the record through1927.
    [Show full text]
  • Haerno. CA-297 4G-\/Ftll. CARQUINEZ BRIDGE
    HAERNo. CA-297 4g-\/ftLL. CARQUINEZ BRIDGE . ' Interstate 80 Spanning Carquinez Strait / — Vallejo Solano County California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service •■ -s Department of the Interior ' San Francisco, California I f #- VMJL HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD Carquinez Bridge HAERNo.CA-297 Location: Crossing the Carquinez Strait between the City of Vallejo, Solano County, and the unincorporated village of Crockett, Contra Costa County, California USGS 7.5 Minute Series - Benicia, Calif. UTM Coordinates: 10'5tf9Ct2£).4212660 Date of Construction: 1923-27 Engineers: Charles Derleth, chief engineer William Burr, consulting engineer David Steinman, design engineer Present Owner: State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Present Use: Highway bridge Significance: The Carquinez Bridge is a cantilever truss structure which carries three lanes of westbound Interstate-80 traffic across the Carquinez Strait. (Eastbound 1-80 traffic is carried by a parallel structure, erected in 1958.) The 1927 bridge was the first major auto bridge in the San Francisco Bay Area, predating by a decade the Golden Gate and San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridges. Replacing an auto ferry across the Carquinez Strait, the bridge was an important link in north-south traffic from the Bay Area to Northern California and the Pacific Northwest, as well as connecting the Bay Area to Sacramento and points east. The bridge's importance as a north-south link diminished somewhat with the opening of the Golden Gate Bridge in 1937, but it remains a critical highway link between the Bay Area and Sacramento, carrying an average of more than fifty thousand vehicles per day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Status of Kokanee in the Greater Lake Washington Watershed
    The Current Status of Kokanee in the Greater Lake Washington Watershed Lewis Creek Kokanee October 2003 Hans B. Berge and Kollin Higgins King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division 201 S. Jackson Street, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98104 This report should be cited as: Berge, H.B., and K. Higgins. 2003. The current status of kokanee in the greater Lake Washington Watershed. King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Water and Land Resources Division. Seattle, Washington. 50pp. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................................i INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................................................1 LAKE WASHINGTON/SAMMAMISH WATERSHED.................................................................................................... 3 EARLY-RUN/ISSAQUAH CREEK................................................................................................................................. 6 MIDDLE-RUN/SAMMAMISH RIVER TRIBUTARIES AND WALSH LAKE................................................................. 6 LATE-RUN/LAKE SAMMAMISH TRIBUTARIES........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • King County Streams Monitoring Update for September 2018
    King County Streams Monitoring Update for September 2018 The Sammamish River (seen here looking downstream at the York Bridge in Redmond) and its corridor have undergone a substantial transformation since colonization in the late 19th century. The river has been dredged and straightened. What once was a network of wetland and meanders has been replaced with productive croplands with agricultural ditches. Thank you for your interest in the Streams Monitor, a monthly update from King County's Routine Stream and River Monitoring Program, which samples water quality at 74 sites on streams each month. This month the focus is on the Sammamish River. The Sammamish is one of the major rivers of King County. It runs from the north end of Lake Sammamish to the north end of Lake Washington. The Sammamish River watershed spans 13 cities and two counties and drains a variety of landscapes from the Issaquah Alps in the south to the Sammamish Plateau in the east to Lynnwood in the north. October 24, 2018 The Taming of the Slough – A Brief History of the Sammamish River Prior to European colonization, the Sammamish River corridor was a system of vast willow-infested wetlands with a narrow, meandering channel. The complex system of emergent, shrub, and forested wetland provided ideal habitat for fish, large and small mammals, and birds. Authors Stickney and McDonald described “dense forest [that] clothed the land and shut in the winding waterway.” October 24, 2018 A major Native American winter village, tlah-WAH-dees, was located at the mouth of the Sammamish River, which was occupied by the ssts'p-abc (“meander dwellers”) and s-tah- PAHBSH (“willow people”).
    [Show full text]
  • Historic and Scenic Corridors Project
    Historic and Scenic Corridors Project Final Report Front cover image: West side road along Snoqualmie Valley near Vincent (now West Snoqualmie Valley Road), looking north, n.d. Courtesy of King County Archives Back cover image: West Snoqualmie Valley Road near Vincent, looking north, 2009. Photo by Ned Ahrens, King County Historic and Scenic Corridors Project Final Report Prepared for King County in collaboration with 4Culture For more information, please call King County Road Services Division at 206-296-6590 or visit our Web site at www.kingcounty.gov/roads printed on recycled paper Acknowledgements Department of Transportation Harold S. Taniguchi, Director Road Services Division Linda Dougherty, Division Director Jennifer Lindwall, Capital Improvement Program and Planning Section Manager Jay Osborne, Acting Capital Improvement Program and Planning Section Manager This project is a collaboration between the King County Road Services Divison, King County Historic Preservation Program and 4Culture. Funding is provided by a grant from the Federal Transportation Enhancement Program. Project Team Margo Christianson, Road Services Division Ruth Harvey, Road Services Division Julie Koler, Historic Preservation Program Flo Lentz, 4Culture Brandi Link, 4Culture Fennelle Miller, FDM Consultants Tom Minichillo, Road Services Division Charlie Sundberg, Historic Preservation Program Katelyn Wright, University of Washington Intern Thank you to ENTRIX for contributions to Chapter IV. Photos by Brandi Link unless otherwise noted. Alternative Formats
    [Show full text]