Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. James and Literacies: Ideology in Dis- Social Linguistics and Literac

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. James and Literacies: Ideology in Dis- Social Linguistics and Literac Social Linguistics and Literacies: Gee provides further proof of Ideology in Discourses. James literacy's ties to social behaviour. Paul Gee. Bristol, PA: The Pal- He also acknowledges that the mer Press, 1990. xxi + 203 pp. indivisible bonds linking language use and social interaction have serious consequences, especially Many people in "literate" societies, when literacy is deployed to wreak when asked to define literacy, al- injustice on individuals or groups. most always do so in terms of read- Like earlier "New Literacy" re- ing and writing abilities. This searchers, Gee exposes the covert narrow interpretation of literacy, an function of reductionist literacy offspring of reductionist psychol- paradigms, namely their justifica- ogy, has reigned supreme in many tion of educational practices that academic and educational contexts are party to social, economic, and for decades, greatly shaping political inequities. literacy theories and classroom Despite these similarities, practices. Within the past ten years, Social Linguistics and Literacies however, a large body of multidis- (henceforth, SL&L) departs from ciplinary research has begun to un- other "New Literacy Studies" in the dermine the authority of this specific theoretical and pedagogi- perspective by situating literacy in cal alternatives it proposes. Ac- larger social practices. cording to Gee, this volume Support for this emerging "...constitutes an overt theory of interdisciplinary perspective has literacy and socially-based linguis- grown, and an increasing emphasis tics" (Introduction: xx) that has been placed on the interplay counters traditional views and between language, educational frames literacy in terms of abilities practice, and societal features of to display various social identities. power and domination. A "cutting Just as actors need more than lines edge" exemplar of such work can to convincingly depict their charac- be found in a series of monographs, ters, Gee argues that all humans anthologies, and textbooks entitled engaged in any sort of social "Critical Perspectives on Literacy interaction must successfully in- and Education." Social Linguistics tegrate specific attitudes, beliefs, and Literacies: Ideology in Dis- behaviours, thoughts and uses of courses, the hook reviewed here, is language. Moreover, humans must the introduction to this collection. be able to combine these elements Firmly located within the paradigm in a myriad of ways in order to of "social" approaches to literacy, exhibit different social identities. or what Gee calls the "New Consequently, literacy as a mass Literacy Studies," this volume term gives way to literacies as a validates many previous research count term. findings and also makes some These ideas are thought- unique contributions. provoking and controversial, yet Ilha do Desterro 29, 1993 pp 139-146 1 40 Reviews / Resenhas rife with implications for language Two, "Introduction to a Social education. Despite the wall of Linguistics -, and finishing with the denial erected by psychological close of part Three, "A Theory of reductionism, many academic re- Discourses". The visual metaphor searchers have grappled with these is that of a pyramid viewed from issues and even tried to offer the bottom up. The first part, educational solutions. SL&L takes covering the greatest range of on this dualistic function of issues, is akin to the base of this criticism and suggestions for pyramid. Moving upwards, the change. Other North American second part resembles the narrow- researchers attempting this task ing of the pyramid as the author include the "Critical Pedagogy" zeroes in on the particulars of devotees of Freire's emancipatory language. Part Three, the literacy philosophy (cf. McLaren, pyramid's apex, consists of Gee's 1989; Giroux, 1988). In the eyes of precise and straightforward theory practitioners, many of these re- of Discourses and literacies. Aural- searchers succeed as critics yet fail ly, one is reminded of a jazz score to be constructive. played live where different phases Gee may be an exception are evident, yet certain chords and here, too, given his efforts to sequences are repeated throughout maximize comprehension and min- the song. Major themes and issues imize frustration by avoiding ex- resonate throughout the three parts, cessive technical jargon, cryptic albeit at different tempos and in references, and abstract theorizing different keys, complementing the devoid of concrete examples. Gee's hierarchy of these parts. project is all the more distinctive The rationale for the volume because of the deftness with which as a whole is rare indeed as it stems he coherently synthesizes issues from a moral mandate to reconcep- from a diverse range of perspec- tualize language use, social tives, some of which include theories, and educational practices. literary criticism, formal linguistic The mandate draws its strength theory, poststructuralist social largely from a careful historical theory, comparative education, cul- analysis of literacy undertaken in tural anthropology, and critical Part One. This history, according to language studies. Gee, is a story of people's attempts The rhetorical layout of this to resolve literacy's fundamental volume gives it an unusual struc- contradiction: regardless of its ture. To appreciate its inherent oppressive or liberating capacities, logic, readers will need to focus on literacy cannot be immune to the the volume's three parts, not the sociopolitical influences of human seven chapters that go into these relations. Specifically, interpreta- parts. Impressionistically, at least tions, definitions, and expectations to this reviewer, the structuring of governing literacy are always these parts takes on both a visual subject to the vagaries of human and aural flavor when going from motives for solidarity and status. part One, "Background", to part Gee sees no easy resolution to Reviews I Resenhas 141 this contradiction, unlike those book, and the moral principle who seize upon solutions which rip concerned with their explication is literacy from its social and political one Gee dubs a "Conceptual origins. Gee claims that these are Principle Governing Human Dis- "facile" attempts spurred on by the course." parade of "myths" about literacy's Part One goes beyond the great potential for improving theoretical realm to provide con- political systems, social relations, temporary evidence in support of and even individual intellectual the moral basis behind Gee's "overt abilities. What has sustained these theory of literacy." Shirley Brice- myths so far, especially in educa- Heath's Ways with Words is a tion both in North America and seminal example of this current abroad, are "scientific" distinctions work. Heath's work stresses the between oral and literate cultures socially situated nature of literacy (see for example Goody, 1977; practices, advocating not a singular Ong, 1982; and Havelock, 1963) literacy of the mind, but multiple Beneath the fanfare and "facts," literacies of the various social however, lurks a darker side where milieus. Heath's now-classic study literacy's capacity to oppress is has served as both a "New Literacy very real to those labelled "il- Studies" attack on the "oral- literate" or "functionally literate." literate" distinction as well as an By confronting this con- insightful glimpse into the connec- tradiction, Gee discloses many tions between home-based lan- unpleasant moments in literacy's guage practices and one's later history that continually reappear. success or failure at school. Their eradication is the goal behind Because of its clarity and the "moral basis" of Gee's efforts. relevance, Heath's study is useful Because terms like literacy are for illustrating the major issues in often implicated in the larger social this volume. inequities of "literate" societies, For those not familiar with the author claims that any attempt this research, Heath conducted an to designate "human" in the ethnography of the home-based honorific sense must render the interactions existing in three dif- how's and why's behind their use ferent Carolina Piedmont com- of these terms as overtly as munities: 1) Trackton, a black possible. He adds that such an working class community; 2) endeavour should be the primary Roadville, a white working class, function of education given that (in strongly Fundamentalist com- "literate" societies) one's level of munity; and 3) the mainstream academic success often strongly middle-class residents of Main- corresponds to one's social and town. The outstanding element in economic standing later in life. The Heath's study was her comparison generalizations and reasons we of language practices in these employ to make sense of concepts homes with those of the school. like social relations and language Hcr findings vividly depict use are called ideologies in this how schools can function to 142 Reviews / Resenhas marginalize "non-mainstream" assumed to be. Much of what populations even at the level of insures conformity to the norms of seemingly insignificant talk. The some groups and not others is the Piedmont schools mirrored many perpetual need Gee claims we all of the language practices, including have for status and solidarity with reading and writing behaviours, others. found in the mainstream homes. The teachers in Heath 's study This large overlap in early home- could be described as having and school-based language prac- cultural models often at odds with tices ensured that mainstream the non-mainstream pupils.
Recommended publications
  • Text, Orality, Literacy, Tradition, Dictation, Education, and Other Paradigms of Explication in Greek Literary Studies
    Oral Tradition, 15/1 (2000): 96-125 Text, Orality, Literacy, Tradition, Dictation, Education, and Other Paradigms of Explication in Greek Literary Studies Barry B. Powell By now we might hope for some kind of consensus on the genesis of the Homeric poems, but the plot seems as muddled as ever. In the history of Homeric studies we find our truest exemplum of cultural myopia. We don’t know what to do with Homer because we think he is just like us. As we change, he changes too. Our present myopia is, in my experience, bound up with a set of terms that mean too many things, or contradictory things, to too many people, creating the illusion that we have grasped something when we haven’t. From a longer list of similar terms, I have selected six to discuss in this article: text, orality, literacy, tradition, dictation, and education. I do not hope to present a universal or historical description of how such terms have been used, but to show how they have come to be mixed up with each other in a perplexing chaos, presenting a distorted description of the nature and origin of early Greek literature. Text Let us begin by thinking about Homer, who, whatever else, is a text and always has been a text (Fig. 1). Homer is a physical object first, with look and texture and graphemes capable of interpretation. One sometimes hears phrases like “oral text” or similar metaphors, but these I reject out of hand. The Homeric Question is directed to the problem of how this physical object, this text, came into being.
    [Show full text]
  • Translating Mimesis of Orality
    Translating mimesis of orality: Robert Frost’s poetry in Catalan and Italian Marcello Giugliano TESI DOCTORAL UPF / ANY 2012 DIRECTORS DE LA TESI Dra. Victòria Alsina Dr. Dídac Pujol DEPARTAMENT DE TRADUCCIÓ I CIÈNCIES DEL LLENGUATGE Ai miei genitori Acknowledgements My first thank you goes to my supervisors, Dr. Victòria Alsina and Dr. Dídac Pujol. Their critical guidance, their insightful comments, their constant support and human understanding have provided me with the tools necessary to take on the numerous challenges of my research with enthusiasm. I would also like to thank Dr. Jenny Brumme for helping me to solve my many doubts on some theoretical issues during our long conversations, in which a smile and a humorous comment never failed. My special thanks are also for Dr. Luis Pegenaute, Dr. José Francisco Ruiz Casanova, and Dr. Patrick Zabalbeascoa for never hiding when they met me in the corridors of the faculty or never diverting their eyes in despair. Thank you for always being ready to give me recommendations and for patiently listening to my only subject of conversation during the last four years. During the project, I have had the privilege to make two research stays abroad. The first, in 2009, in Leuven, Belgium, at the Center for Translation Studies (CETRA), and the second in 2010 at the Translation Center of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, USA. I would like to give a heartfelt thank you to my tutors there, Dr. Reine Meylaerts and Dr. Maria Tymoczko respectively, for their tutoring and for offering me the chance to attend classes and seminars during my stay there, converting that period into a fruitful and exciting experience.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effectiveness of Reflection in Developing Students' Oracy at The
    Mansoura University Faculty of Education Dept. of Curriculum & Instruction THE EFFECTIVENESS OF REFLECTION IN DEVELOPING STUDENTS' ORACY IN ENGLISH AT THE FACULTIES OF TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY A Dissertation Submitted for the Degree of Ph. D. in Education Curriculum & Instruction (TEFL) By Jihan El-Sayed Ahmed Zayed English Language Instructor, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality, Suez Canal University Supervisors Prof. Badran A. Hassan Dr. Adel A. Al-Sheikh Professor of Curriculum & Instruction (English) Associate Professor of Curriculum & Instruction (English) Faculty of Education, Faculty of Education, Mansoura University Mansoura University 2009 The Researcher’s Curriculum Vitae Name: Jihan El-Sayed Ahmed Zayed Birth Date: 20/4/1973 Birth Place: Tanta, El-Gharbeiah Governorate Qualifications: 1. B.A. in Literature and Education, Dept. of English, Faculty of Education, Tanta University, May 1995 2. Special Diploma in Education, Faculty of Education, Tanta University, September 1997 3. M.A. in Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Mansoura University, July 2003 Previous Position: English Language Teacher, Sammanoud Prep School for Girls (1995- 2005) Current Position: English Language Instructor, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality, Suez Canal University ii Acknowledgments It is my pleasure to thank all people whose thoughts, ideas, suggestions, reassurance, and support shaped this piece of research. First, I would like to thank Almighty Allah for continuously blessing me with persistence, health, and faith to complete my Ph. D. Degree. All gratitude must be extended to Prof. Zeinab Al-Naggar who honored me when she graciously accepted examining my dissertation. Her precise opinions, scientific remarks, and creative ideas have greatly enriched it. May Allah grant her more health and science and help her dispense them to His Contentment.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Orality-Literacy Relationship and Its Implications for English Language Teaching in Bangladesh
    IIUC Studies 14(2) DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/iiucs.v14i2.39883 Revisiting the orality-literacy relationship and its implications for English language teaching in Bangladesh Md. Maksud Ali Department of English Language & Literature International Islamic University Chittagong (IIUC), Bangladesh Abstract This paper focuses on different concepts of literacy and their implications for TESOL (Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages). Taking a critical perspective, the study examines the traditional concept of literacy and illuminates how a narrow approach to literacy may lead to a conflict between national policy text and the actual pedagogic practices. Therefore, the author advocates for situating contemporary TESOL pedagogy within a broader concept. In addition, the study examines how literacy is embedded with orality, and whether the link between them has any implications for English language education in Bangladesh. It is argued here that since different cultures and societies do not adhere to a single set of literacy practices, an awareness of learners’ and other stakeholders’ socio-cultural concepts of literacy in a society is essential for TESOL practitioners in order for their materials and methods to be socio-culturally responsive. The study has implications for policy makers, materials writers and TESOL practitioners. Keywords Literacy, Orality, TESOL, Socio-cultural background, Bangladesh Paper type Review paper 1. Introduction Literacy, as many will agree, has always been one of the much talked-about issues in educational discourse. However, the term itself is difficult to be defined easily. The conventional view of literacy is confined to reading and writing (Hopkins, 2009), thus, labelling those illiterate who cannot read or write (Jeffries, 1967).
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME ED 280 080 AUTHOR the Dynamics Of
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 280 080 CS 210 396 AUTHOR Squire, James R., Ed. TITLE The Dynamics of Language Learning: Research in Reading and English. INSTITUTION ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills, Urbana, Ill.; National Conference on Research in English. SPONS AGENCY Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8141-1276-5 PUB DATE 87 CONTRACT 400-86-0045 NOTE 420p.; Papers commissioned for the Mid-Decade Seminar on the Teaching of Reading and English (Chicago, IL, March 29-31, 1985). For the seminar's discussions of these papers, see ED 274 967. AVAILABLE FROMNational Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL 61801 (Stock No. 12765, $20.00 member, $25.00 nonmember). PUB TYPE Information Analyses - ERIC Information Analysis Products (071) y (1Collected Works - Conference Proceedings (021) -- Reports - Descripti EDRS PRICE MF01/PC17 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Classroom Environment; Classroom Research; Classroom Techniques; Cognitive Development; Computer Uses in Education; Educational Trends; Elementary Education; Evaluation Methods; *Language Processing; Literacy; Literature Appreciation; Oral Language; Reader Text Relationship; Reading Comprehension; Reading Instruction; Reading Processes; *Reading Research; *Reading Writing Relationship; *Research Opportunities; *Technological Advancement; Writing Instruction; Writing Processes; *Writing Research; Written Language IDENTIFIERS Process Product Relationship; *Research Trends; Text Structure Focusing on future directions for English and reading ABSTRACT research, the papers presented in this book examine thecomplex interplay of skills, processes, and classroomconditions that 4nfluence the development of children'scompetence in reading, writing, and the language arts. The titlesand authors of the essays are as follows: (1) "Reading and Wri :ng Relations: Assumptionsand Directions (Lames Flood and Diana L,pp); (2) "The CognitiveBase of Reading and Writing" (Stephen B.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “ Missing Page(s)” . I f it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along w ith adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image o f the page can be found in the adjacent frame. I f copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin film ing at the upper le ft hand comer o f a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again-beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
    [Show full text]
  • PREDYS: Supporting Children at Risk of Dyslexia at the Transition Period from Pre- Primary to Primary (No 2019-1-ES01-KA201-065691)
    PREDYS: supporting children at risk of dyslexia at the transition period from pre- primary to primary (No 2019-1-ES01-KA201-065691) PEDAGOGICAL FRAME REPORT Information summarized by Latvia 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1. Research on the practice in other European countries 5 1.1. Poland 6 1.2. United Kingdom 8 1.3. Austria 12 1.4. Hungary 14 1.5. Denmark 15 2. Summary of previous projects in partner countries 16 2.1. Spain 16 2.2. Bulgaria 18 2.3. Greece 21 2.4. Latvia 22 2.5. Turkey 24 2.6. Portugal 25 3. Pre-requisites for a succesfull school start 29 4. Summary of the dyslexia situation in the project countries 37 5. Summary of literature and sources 47 2 INTRODUCTION The first task of schooling is to help a child to exquisite the literacy, in other words: to learn to read, write and do arithmetical operations. It sounds easy after hundreds of years in which millions of children all over the world have been taught to do so. But in fact this task is very complicated. In order to learn to read, write, do math, each child must pass through a series of successive steps deployed in time; at every stage, to acquire a new skill which would facilitate him/her in achieving the ultimate goal associated not only with formal recognition of letters, words, numbers but with consolidation of the ability to understand, proceed, store and interpret the information. If the child has a rich vocabulary and can express himself/herself well verbally, it does not mean a child will naturally and easily learn to read and/or write.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of the Approach to L1 Oracy in Polish and Portuguese Early Education Curricula
    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE APPROACH TO L1 ORACY IN POLISH AND PORTUGUESE EARLY EDUCATION CURRICULA MICHAŁ DASZKIEWICZ*, OTÍLIA SOUSA**/***, MARTA ŁOCKIEWICZ*, DALILA LINO**, MARTYNA PIECHOWSKA*, MARINA FUERTES**, MAGDALENA WAWRZYNIAK-ŚLIWSKA*, TERESA COSTA-PEREIRA*** *University of Gdańsk **Lisbon Polytechnic Institute ***University of Lisbon Abstract The aim of our paper is to describe and examine the approach to oracy in core curricula in two European countries: Poland and Portugal. In the paper, we examine kindergarten and early education L1 curricula, identifying their strengths and weaknesses, similarities and differences, and discuss theoretical positions that support the guiding documents of the educational activities in the two countries. Though Polish and Portuguese early education recommendations and obligations include teaching ora- cy, the importance they put on its development is quite dissimilar. Polish legislation focuses on teaching literacy. The term “oracy” is not used, and oracy itself is treated as a sub-category with specific require- ments concerning most elementary forms of expression, e. g. naming or answering questions. Portu- guese legislation lists orality among four main educational components, together with reading and writ- ing, literary education, and grammar. The term “orality” corresponds to oracy, and is treated as a tool for both expression and comprehension, and a prerequisite for advanced cognitive skills. We think that the development of oracy in early education should be considered a priority, together with the development of literacy, taking into account its importance for the children’s future academic achievement and active citizenship. Keywords: oracy, Poland, Portugal, curriculum, early childhood education 1 Daszkiewicz, M., Sousa,O., Łockiewicz, M., Lino, D., Piechowska, M., Fuertes, M., Wawrzyni- ak-Śliwska, M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Word in Africa: Orality and Literacy in Achebe's Things Fall Apart, Arrow of God, and No Longer at Ease
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Honors Program Senior Projects WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Fall 1999 The Word in Africa: Orality and Literacy in Achebe's Things Fall Apart, Arrow of God, and No Longer at Ease Matthew Taggart Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors Part of the African Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Taggart, Matthew, "The Word in Africa: Orality and Literacy in Achebe's Things Fall Apart, Arrow of God, and No Longer at Ease" (1999). WWU Honors Program Senior Projects. 313. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors/313 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Honors Program Senior Projects by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Word in Africa: Orality and Literacy in Achebe's Things Fall Apart, Arrow of God, and No Longer at Ease By Matthew Taggart HONORS THESIS In presenting this Honors paper in partial requirements for a bachelor's degree at Western Washington University, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood that any publication of this thesis for commercial purposes or for financial ain shall not be allowed without m written Date Preface: I picked up Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart, on a whim, as a quick summer read.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Conference Abstracts
    Keynote speaKers Acoustic Cosmopolitanism: Echoes of Multilingualism Professor Sneja Gunew, University of British Columbia [email protected] Encounters with Derrida taught us that Voice, orality, privileged the authority of ‘presence’ whereas writing was perceived as a type of second-order, mediated communication where stable meaning receded even further. In his later work (Monolingualism and the Prosthesis of Origins) Derrida accentuated the fact that the enunciative split means that no-one may claim to own language, to fully control its meaning (‘the hegemony of the homogeneous’). At the same time that he demonstrated the instability of language and meaning Derrida, an Algerian Jew, confessed to his intolerance of accents in relation to his own French monolingualism. He points out that such accents are not detectable in writing. In her recent perceptive book Not Like a Native Speaker, Rey Chow demonstrates that if one looks at language in relation to colonialism an argument could be made that the colonised, in their linguistic subjugation, understood far more consciously than the colonisers that the hegemony of the homogeneous does not exist. Building on such explorations, my paper examines the oral dimensions of multilingualism in Australia. To what extent does this hum or ‘presence’ of other languages (Indigenous as well as others) fundamentally destabilize the authority that English appears to enjoy within a national culture that perpetuates its colonial monolingualism? To what extent do they merely create ‘accents’ that reinstate a yearning for homogeneous origins? Sneja Gunew (FRSC) BA (Melbourne), MA (Toronto), PhD (Newcastle, NSW) has taught in England, Australia and Canada. She has published widely on multicultural, postcolonial and feminist critical theory and is Professor Emerita of English and Women's and Gender Studies at the University of British Columbia, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Social Uses of Orality and Functional Literacy: a Narrative Approach
    Reading & Writing - Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa ISSN: (Online) 2308-1422, (Print) 2079-8245 Page 1 of 7 Original Research Cultural and social uses of orality and functional literacy: A narrative approach Author: Lesotho’s educational system and development are largely influenced by missionaries and 1 Lineo R. Johnson colonisers who taught the three ‘Rs’ (reading, writing and numeracy skills) to the Basotho. Affiliation: Most of those enlightened Basotho were to carry on the duties of either educating others or as 1Department of Adult missionary workers. Some became clerks, interpreters, police officers, nurses and Sunday Education and Youth school teachers. This article is an account of a functionally literate Mosotho male adult learner Development, University of who was herding livestock and taught himself reading and writing skills. In his narrative, South Africa, South Africa Hlalefang (not his real name) compares literacy to money and a watch or a clock. He further Corresponding author: expresses how people like him have managed to muster some basic and restructure the Lineo Johnson, cognitive and oral history and archival memories, through intuitiveness. The story is based on [email protected] the work of Paulo Freire where culture influences the discourse of literacy. A qualitative Dates: narrative story-telling approach was used to relate Hlalefang’s lived-experiences as he Received: 05 Oct. 2015 navigated his ways and challenges using orality acquired through various life encounters. Accepted: 11 July 2016 This inspirational cultural narrative demonstrates that culture and social uses are imperatives Published: 26 Oct. 2016 in functional literacy. The article challenges those in adult education, literacy, development How to cite this article: practitioners and policy-makers to consider some aspects of culture and to be innovative in Johnson, L.R., 2016, ‘Cultural their approaches to multi-literacies.
    [Show full text]
  • Orality, Literacy and Reading: Differences and Complexities Facing the Public School
    Oralidade, alfabetização e leitura: enfrentando diferenças e complexidades na escola pública* Claudemir Belintane Universidade de São Paulo Resumo Apresenta-se o relato de uma pesquisa, na área de ensino da leitura e da escrita, realizada em duas séries de primeiros anos do ensino fundamental, em uma escola pública da cidade de São Paulo. A partir de diagnósticos baseados na cultura oral de alunos que apresentavam dificuldades de aprendizagem de leitura mesmo após três ou quatro anos de escolarização, procurou-se criar, ministrar e monitorar um programa de ensino baseado na transição entre cultura oral e cultura escrita. Trata-se de uma pesquisa de natureza qualitativa, cuja preocupação é lidar com a heterogeneidade da sala de aula em seu processo e em sua complexidade. O viés teórico é multidisciplinar, incluindo áreas de pesquisas sujeitas às influências da linguística, da psicanálise e da educação e, ainda, dos estudos de pesquisadores da área que se convencionou chamar “equação oralidade-escrita” (Havelock,1995). Os resultados trazem dados, relatos de intervenções e reflexões que podem subsidiar programas de ensino para a faixa etária estudada e questiona ainda o foco excessivo que as metodologias construtivistas põem sobre o ato de escrever ou sobre a própria escrita. Propõe uma nova perspectiva de enlaçamento entre a cultura oral dos alunos e letramento escolar, assumindo uma ambiência de oralidade, alfabetização e leitura que inclui o suporte eletrônico e uma organização mais coletiva do trabalho escolar nas séries iniciais, sobretudo na articulação (“dobradiça”) entre o ensino infantil e o fundamental I. Palavras-chave Oralidade — Alfabetização — Leitura — Novos suportes — Infantil. Correspondência: Claudemir Belintane Faculdade de Educação-USP Av.
    [Show full text]