Spacex Says No Starship Launch on Monday 29 March 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

SpaceX says no Starship launch on Monday 29 March 2021 before returning to the ground for a soft vertical landing. SN8 and SN9, which launched in December and February respectively, crash landed and exploded, while SN10 successfully landed then blew up a few minutes later during its test on March 3. Despite the previous failures, analysts say SpaceX is gathering valuable data that will help it to accelerate its development timeline. Eventually, SpaceX plans to combine the Starship This screengrab made from SpaceX's live webcast spaceship with a Super Heavy rocket, creating a shows the Starship SN10 prototype during a test flight fully reusable system. after engines were ignited just before the test was aborted This final version will stand 394 feet (120 meters) tall and will be able to carry 100 metric tonnes into Earth orbit—the most powerful launch vehicle ever developed. SpaceX has postponed the latest test flight of its prototype interplanetary Starship rocket from the © 2021 AFP company's south Texas facility, Elon Musk said Monday. "FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) inspector unable to reach Starbase in time for launch today," the company's founder and CEO tweeted. "Postponed to no earlier than tomorrow." No launch window has so far been provided for Tuesday. The company is hoping to finally perform a successful test flight after the last three attempts ended in spectacular explosions, and had been granted a five hour window for spaceflight activities by local authorities on Monday. SN11 is the 11th prototype of Starship, which SpaceX hopes will one day be able to fly crewed missions to the Moon, Mars and beyond. It will be the fourth to conduct a test flight, ascending to an altitude of six miles (10 kilometers) 1 / 2 APA citation: SpaceX says no Starship launch on Monday (2021, March 29) retrieved 2 October 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2021-03-spacex-starship-monday.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only. 2 / 2 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects
Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects NASA Grant No. NNX17AE81G First Year Report Prepared by: Marc G. Millis, Jeff Greason, Rhonda Stevenson Tau Zero Foundation Business Office: 1053 East Third Avenue Broomfield, CO 80020 Prepared for: NASA Headquarters, Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Washington, DC 20546 June 2018 Millis 2018 Grant NNX17AE81G_for_CR.docx pg 1 of 69 ABSTRACT Progress toward developing an evaluation process for interstellar propulsion and power options is described. The goal is to contrast the challenges, mission choices, and emerging prospects for propulsion and power, to identify which prospects might be more advantageous and under what circumstances, and to identify which technology details might have greater impacts. Unlike prior studies, the infrastructure expenses and prospects for breakthrough advances are included. This first year's focus is on determining the key questions to enable the analysis. Accordingly, a work breakdown structure to organize the information and associated list of variables is offered. A flow diagram of the basic analysis is presented, as well as more detailed methods to convert the performance measures of disparate propulsion methods into common measures of energy, mass, time, and power. Other methods for equitable comparisons include evaluating the prospects under the same assumptions of payload, mission trajectory, and available energy. Missions are divided into three eras of readiness (precursors, era of infrastructure, and era of breakthroughs) as a first step before proceeding to include comparisons of technology advancement rates. Final evaluation "figures of merit" are offered. Preliminary lists of mission architectures and propulsion prospects are provided.
[Show full text]
Available Online Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2019, 6(11):202-215 Research Article Theoretical
Available online www.jsaer.com Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2019, 6(11):202-215 ISSN: 2394-2630 Research Article CODEN(USA): JSERBR Theoretical Consideration of Star Trek's Space Navigation Yoshinari Minami Advanced Space Propulsion Investigation Laboratory (ASPIL), (Formerly NEC Space Development Division), Japan, E-Mail: [email protected] Abstract As is well known, Star Trek is a masterpiece that has been known worldwide since 1966 as a science fiction set in the famous galaxy universe. A starship (Enterprise) arrives at a star system in a short period of time to a star system that is tens, hundreds and thousands of light years away from the Earth. This method of making a starship reach a distant star system is skillfully expressed in the movie using images. Unfortunately, however, there is no concrete explanation from the physical point of view of the propulsion method of the starship and the principle of warp navigation, that is, the space propulsion theory and the space navigation theory. This paper is an attempt to explain Star Trek's space navigation by applying the hyper-space navigation theory to the field propulsion theory that the author has published in international conferences and peer-reviewed journals since 1993 [1]. Since this paper mainly describes the concept of the principle, most of the mathematical expressions are reduced. See the references for theoretical formulas [1- 6]. Keywords Star Trek; starship; galaxy; space-time; interstellar travel; star flight; navigation; field propulsion; space drive; imaginary time; hyperspace; wormhole; time hole; astrophysics 1. Introduction Space development in the 21st century, unless there is a groundbreaking advance in the space transportation system, the area of activity of human beings will be restricted to the vicinity of the Earth forever and new knowledge cannot be obtained.
[Show full text]
Teaching Speculative Fiction in College: a Pedagogy for Making English Studies Relevant
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University English Dissertations Department of English Summer 8-7-2012 Teaching Speculative Fiction in College: A Pedagogy for Making English Studies Relevant James H. Shimkus Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_diss Recommended Citation Shimkus, James H., "Teaching Speculative Fiction in College: A Pedagogy for Making English Studies Relevant." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2012. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_diss/95 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of English at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TEACHING SPECULATIVE FICTION IN COLLEGE: A PEDAGOGY FOR MAKING ENGLISH STUDIES RELEVANT by JAMES HAMMOND SHIMKUS Under the Direction of Dr. Elizabeth Burmester ABSTRACT Speculative fiction (science fiction, fantasy, and horror) has steadily gained popularity both in culture and as a subject for study in college. While many helpful resources on teaching a particular genre or teaching particular texts within a genre exist, college teachers who have not previously taught science fiction, fantasy, or horror will benefit from a broader pedagogical overview of speculative fiction, and that is what this resource provides. Teachers who have previously taught speculative fiction may also benefit from the selection of alternative texts presented here. This resource includes an argument for the consideration of more speculative fiction in college English classes, whether in composition, literature, or creative writing, as well as overviews of the main theoretical discussions and definitions of each genre.
[Show full text]
Ringworld 01 Ringworld Larry Niven CHAPTER 1 Louis Wu
Ringworld 01 Ringworld Larry Niven CHAPTER 1 Louis Wu In the nighttime heart of Beirut, in one of a row of general-address transfer booths, Louis Wu flicked into reality. His foot-length queue was as white and shiny as artificial snow. His skin and depilated scalp were chrome yellow; the irises of his eyes were gold; his robe was royal blue with a golden steroptic dragon superimposed. In the instant he appeared, he was smiling widely, showing pearly, perfect, perfectly standard teeth. Smiling and waving. But the smile was already fading, and in a moment it was gone, and the sag of his face was like a rubber mask melting. Louis Wu showed his age. For a few moments, he watched Beirut stream past him: the people flickering into the booths from unknown places; the crowds flowing past him on foot, now that the slidewalks had been turned off for the night. Then the clocks began to strike twenty-three. Louis Wu straightened his shoulders and stepped out to join the world. In Resht, where his party was still going full blast, it was already the morning after his birthday. Here in Beirut it was an hour earlier. In a balmy outdoor restaurant Louis bought rounds of raki and encouraged the singing of songs in Arabic and Interworld. He left before midnight for Budapest. Had they realized yet that he had walked out on his own party? They would assume that a woman had gone with him, that he would be back in a couple of hours. But Louis Wu had gone alone, jumping ahead of the midnight line, hotly pursued by the new day.
[Show full text]
Simone Caroti – the Generation Starship in Science Fiction
Book Review: The Generation Starship In Science Fiction A Critical History, 1934-2001 Simone Caroti reviewed by John I Davies Dr Simone Caroti has now delivered his presentation on The Generation Starship In Science Fiction to students taking the i4is-led interstellar elective at the International Space University in both 2020 and 2021. Here John Davies reviews his 2011 book based on his PhD work at Purdue University*. Within an overall chronological plan the major themes in Dr Caroti's book seem to me to be - ■ The conflict between the two conceptions of a worldship. Is it a world which happens have an artificial "substrate" or is it a ship with a mission which happens to require a multi-generation crew. ■ How can the vision of dreamers like Tsiolkovsky, J D Bernal and Robert Goddard be made to inspire the source civilisation, for whom this is a massive enterprise, the initial travellers, their intermediate descendants and those who must make a new world at journeys end? ■ And, more practically, how can culture, science and technology be sufficiently preserved over many generations? Opening Chapters The book sees the development of the worldship as a fictional theme in six overlapping eras - the first worldship ideas (not all as fiction), Published: McFarland 2011 mcfarlandbooks.com The Gernsback Era, 1926-1940 , The Campbell Era, 1937-1949, The Image credit: Bill Knapp,Arrival Birth of the Space Age, 1946-1957, The New Wave and Beyond, www.artprize.org/bill-knapp 1957-1979 and The Information Age, 1980-2001. Caroti read a lot of science fiction and speculative non-fiction before beginning his PhD at Purdue University.
[Show full text]
SW Adventure Template
VEHICLE OPS: Star Journeys INTRODUCTION Travel amongst the stars is a complex business, whether it be for trade, pleasure, or adventure. Vehicle Ops: Star Journeys, details astrogation, sublight travel, & starports a ship crew may encounter during their travels. TABLE OF CONTENTS CREDITS Starports p. 2 Source material by Fantasy Flight Games In-System Ops p. 5 Original material by Sturn of FFG Forums Arrival p. 5 Operational Costs by Dave “RebelDave” Approach p. 5 Brown. Primary inspiration & initial source. METOSP p. 6 Customs p. 7 Hyperspace description by Ryoden of FFG Docking p. 8 Forums. Departure p. 8 Editing & review by BradKnowles of FFG Astrogation p. 9 Forums. Navigation Data p. 12 Hyperspace Tricks p. 14 Consolidated Tables p. 17 VEHICLE OPS SERIES This is a portion of the greater Vehicle Ops series of fan-made supplements. Each tries to provide greater detail to vehicle operations while not changing any core book rules, if possible. While each may be used separately, these supplements will sometimes refer to each other. See Sturn’s Stuff for more. EDGE OF THE EMPIRE STARPORTS The most important location for any world within the Star Wars galaxy is its starport. A world’s starport is a nexus of trade and travel. A good port of call is a blessing for any starship crew as a large variety of needed services may be available. The Empire rates starports by a letter grade and a more descriptive title. The five grades of starports are described below using the following descriptors: Docking: Facilities for landing, storage, and unloading cargo.
[Show full text]
Accelerating Martian and Lunar Science Through Spacex Starship Missions
Accelerating Martian and Lunar Science through SpaceX Starship Missions Jennifer L. Heldmann, NASA Ames Research Center, Division of Space Sciences & Astrobiology, Planetary Systems Branch, Moffett Field, CA 94035, 650-604-5530, [email protected] Ali M. Bramson, Purdue University, [email protected] Shane Byrne, University of Arizona, [email protected] Ross Beyer, SETI Institute, [email protected] Peter Carrato, Bechtel Corp., [email protected] Nicholas Cummings, SpaceX, [email protected] Matthew Golombek, Jet Propulsion Lab, [email protected] Tanya Harrison, Outer Space Institute, [email protected] James Head, Brown University, [email protected] Kip Hodges, Arizona State University, [email protected] Keith Kennedy, Bechtel Corp., [email protected] Joe Levy, Colgate University, [email protected] Darlene S.S Lim, NASA Ames Research Center, [email protected] Margarita Marinova, Independent Consultant, [email protected] Alfred McEwen, University of Arizona, [email protected] Gareth Morgan, Planetary Science Institute, [email protected] Asmin Pathare, Planetary Science Institute, [email protected] Nathaniel Putzig, Planetary Science Institute, [email protected] Steve Ruff, Arizona State University, [email protected] Juliana Scheiman, SpaceX, [email protected] Hanna Sizemore, Planetary Science Institute, [email protected] Nathan Williams, Jet Propulsion Lab, [email protected] David Wilson, Bechtel Corp., [email protected] Paul Wooster, SpaceX, [email protected] Kris Zacny, Honeybee Robotics, [email protected] Abstract SpaceX is developing the Starship vehicle for both human and robotic flights to the surface of the Moon and Mars. This two-stage vehicle offers unprecedented payload capacity and the promise of lowering the cost of surface access due to its full reusability.
[Show full text]
On the Legality of Mars Colonisation
Joshua Fitzmaurice* and Stacey Henderson** ON THE LEGALITY OF MARS COLONISATION ‘Humanity will not remain on the earth forever, but in pursuit of light and space it will at first timidly penetrate beyond the limits of the atmosphere, and then conquer all the space around the sun.’1 ABSTRACT Recent technological advancements made by governmental agencies and private industry have raised hopes for the future of human space flight beyond the Moon. These advancements are increasing the feasibil- ity of endeavours to establish a permanent human habitat on Mars, as a safeguard for our species, for scientific endeavours, and for commercial purposes. This article analyses some of the legal issues associated with Mars colonisation, focusing on the lawfulness of such a venture and the legal status of colonists. I INTRODUCTION ecent technological advancements made by governmental agencies and private industry have raised hopes for the future of human space flight beyond Rthe Moon. The United States’ National Aeronautics and Space Administration (‘NASA’) is developing a new generation of launch and crew systems that will enable * Surveillance of Space Capability Officer, Royal Australian Air Force; MSc (Physics, Space Operations) RMC Canada. Email: [email protected]. The views expressed in this article are personal views and should not be interpreted as an official position. ** Lecturer, Adelaide Law School, The University of Adelaide; PhD (Adel). Email: [email protected]. 1 Letter from Konstantin Tsiolkovsky to Boris Vorobiev, 12 August 1911. See, eg, Rex Hall and David Shayler, The Rocket Men: Vostok & Voskhod: The First Soviet Manned Space-flights (Springer, 2001).
[Show full text]
State of the Space Industrial Base 2020 Report
STATE OF THE SPACE INDUSTRIAL BASE 2020 A Time for Action to Sustain US Economic & Military Leadership in Space Summary Report by: Brigadier General Steven J. Butow, Defense Innovation Unit Dr. Thomas Cooley, Air Force Research Laboratory Colonel Eric Felt, Air Force Research Laboratory Dr. Joel B. Mozer, United States Space Force July 2020 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this report reflect those of the workshop attendees, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the US government, the Department of Defense, the US Air Force, or the US Space Force. Use of NASA photos in this report does not state or imply the endorsement by NASA or by any NASA employee of a commercial product, service, or activity. USSF-DIU-AFRL | July 2020 i ABOUT THE AUTHORS Brigadier General Steven J. Butow, USAF Colonel Eric Felt, USAF Brig. Gen. Butow is the Director of the Space Portfolio at Col. Felt is the Director of the Air Force Research the Defense Innovation Unit. Laboratory’s Space Vehicles Directorate. Dr. Thomas Cooley Dr. Joel B. Mozer Dr. Cooley is the Chief Scientist of the Air Force Research Dr. Mozer is the Chief Scientist at the US Space Force. Laboratory’s Space Vehicles Directorate. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS FROM THE EDITORS Dr. David A. Hardy & Peter Garretson The authors wish to express their deep gratitude and appreciation to New Space New Mexico for hosting the State of the Space Industrial Base 2020 Virtual Solutions Workshop; and to all the attendees, especially those from the commercial space sector, who spent valuable time under COVID-19 shelter-in-place restrictions contributing their observations and insights to each of the six working groups.
[Show full text]
Science Fiction and Folk Fictions at NASA
Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 5 (2019), 135-159 DOI:10.17351/ests2019.315 “All these worlds are yours except …”: Science fiction and folk fictions at NASA JANET VERTESI1 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Abstract Although they command real spacecraft exploring the solar system, NASA scientists refer frequently to science fiction in the course of their daily work. Fluency with the Star Trek series and other touchstone works demonstrates membership in broader geek culture. But references to Star Trek, movies like 2001 and 2010, and Dr. Strangelove also do the work of demarcating project team affiliation and position, theorizing social and political dynamics, and motivating individuals in a chosen course of action. As such, science fiction classics serve as local folk fictions that enable embedded commentary on the socio-political circumstances of technoscientific work: in essence, a form of lay social theorizing. Such fiction references therefore allow scientists and engineers to openly yet elliptically discuss their social, political, and interactional environment, all the while maintaining face as credible, impartial, technical experts. Keywords science fiction; politics of science; lay sociology Introduction Planning for NASA’s new mission to Jupiter’s moon Europa is underway at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), a Caltech facility near Los Angeles that operates contracts for robotic spaceflight. Based in a recently-opened building that is all concrete, steel and turquoise glass, the floor that houses the nascent project is a modern open office with beige cubicles, blonde wood conference tables, and brushed metal door signs. Early in the summer of 2016, I walk into one of the offices that ring the open floor, set down my bag and bring out my notebook in preparation for a meeting with the mission’s chief scientist.
[Show full text]
Afro-Futuretyping Generation Starships and New Earths 05015 C.E
International Journal of Communication 10(2016), Forum 5749–5762 1932–8036/2016FRM0002 Afro-Futuretyping Generation Starships and New Earths 05015 C.E. LONNY J AVI BROOKS (provocateur) California State University, East Bay, USA DANIEL SUTKO California State University, Fullerton, USA ARAM SINNREICH American University, USA RYAN WALLACE California State University, East Bay, USA We are slaves in the sense that we depend for our daily survival upon an expand-or- expire agro-industrial empire—a crackpot machine—that the specialists cannot comprehend and the managers cannot manage. Which is, furthermore, devouring world resources at an exponential rate. Edward Abbey (Bishop, 2010, p. 36) The Long Now Clock hit 05015 C.E. (Common Era) on Earth, and trillions celebrated as the signal was relayed across starships and space colonies now arrayed across a rather small part of the galaxy, but considered miraculous, nonetheless, as faster-than-light travel now added some capability similar to a Prius and its combination of gas and electricity. Some received the signal earlier than others as Earth’s year moved further from 5015 by the time the last human space outpost signaled back. A dazzling combination of human speciation, various forms and futuretypes of humanity challenged what we originally thought humans could be. In addition, the tired notions of command and control systems shrunk as a percentage of how to live aboard and run a starship and/or space colony. The limiting assumptions for circulating stories of space exploration perpetuate, confirm, and challenge our assumptions about gender, cultural, and racial identity. One rampant assumption is the perpetuation of segregation simply by virtue of how the crew and its generation starship will be constructed.
[Show full text]
HLS Decision One Pager V24 National Team JE
NASA’s Decision to Eliminate Competition from the Human Landing System Program Wrong for America’s Leadership in Space ON APRIL 16, 2021, NASA abruptly altered a course supported by Congress by selecting a sole concept and awardee – SpaceX’s Starship – for the Human Landing System (HLS) Program. From the program’s inception, NASA had correctly planned to select two distinct providers for the next generation crewed lunar lander. Two providers ensure greater safety and mission success, promote competition, and control costs. Despite this, NASA ran a flawed acquisition and ignored the significant risks of a one provider model. WHY ONLY ONE PROVIDER? NASA Blames Lack of Funding — Even though Congress appropriated nearly $1.5 billion for HLS in just two fiscal years, including $850 million in FY21, NASA’s source selection rationale improperly justifies the selection of a lone provider as a result of “anticipated future funding for the HLS Program.”1 Unfortunately, this justification lacks precedence and is light on facts, particularly for firm-fixed price, milestone-based programs like HLS. With funding appropriated on an annual basis, the agency frequently makes awards without clarity of out-year funding and with much less funding certainty and significantly less Congressional support than exists in HLS. NASA Ran an Inconsistent and Unfair Competition — NASA’s source selection process was different for each bidder. For example, SpaceX was offered the opportunity to re-price based on new budget information supplied by NASA that was not provided to the other bidders. The National Team was not given this opportunity, despite evidence in the Base Period proposal of its ability to reduce its price to meet a NASA budget constraint.
[Show full text]