DOCSLIB.ORG

Exo-S Interim Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exo-S Interim Report Exo-S: Starshade Probe-Class Exoplanet Direct Imaging Mission Concept Interim Report April 28, 2014 CL#14-1548 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Exo-S: Starshade Probe-Class Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Exoplanet Direct Imaging Mission Concept Interim Report ExoPlanet Exploration Program Astronomy, Physics and Space Technology Directorate Jet Propulsion Laboratory for Astrophysics Division Science Mission Directorate NASA April 28, 2014 Science and Technology Definition Team Sara Seager, Chair (MIT) JPL Design Team: M. Turnbull (GCI) D. Lisman, Lead W. Sparks (STSci) D. Webb S. Shaklan and M. Thomson (NASA-JPL) R. Trabert N.J. Kasdin (Princeton U.) D. Scharf S. Goldman, M. Kuchner, and A. Roberge (NASA-GSFC) S. Martin W. Cash (U. Colorado) J. Henrikson E. Cady The cost information contained in this document is of a budgetary and planning nature and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute a commitment on the part of JPL and Caltech. © 2014. All rights reserved. Exo-S STDT Interim Report Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Scientific Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 The Diversity of Exoplanets ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Exoplanet Atmospheres ............................................................................................................... 1-3 1.1.3 An Anticipated Diversity for Planet Habitability and Biosignature Gases ..................................... 1-4 1.1.4 Why Space-Based Direct Imaging? ............................................................................................. 1-5 1.1.5 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2 Technical Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1-5 1.2.1 Starshade Conceptual Introduction ............................................................................................. 1-5 1.2.2 History ......................................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.3 Starshade Strengths .................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.2.4 Programmatic Challenges ........................................................................................................... 1-8 1.2.5 Technical Challenges .................................................................................................................. 1-8 1.2.6 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1-9 1.3 The Exoplanet Science Landscape in 2024 ............................................................................................. 1-9 1.3.1 Indirect Detections Using Stellar Reflex Motion ........................................................................... 1-9 1.3.2 Transits ...................................................................................................................................... 1-10 1.3.3 Exoplanet Imaging Detections ................................................................................................... 1-10 1.3.4 Disk Imaging .............................................................................................................................. 1-11 1.3.5 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1-12 2 Science Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Science Goals .......................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Detailed Description of Science Objectives .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2.1 Identifying Exoplanets .................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2.2 Characterizing Exoplanets via Spectroscopy ............................................................................... 2-2 2.2.3 Known Giant Planets ................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.2.4 Circumstellar Disk Science .......................................................................................................... 2-6 2.3 Astrophysical Contaminants ..................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.3.1 Exozodiacal Clumps and Background Objects ............................................................................ 2-8 2.3.2 Scattered Light from Companion Stars ........................................................................................ 2-9 2.3.3 Background Stars ...................................................................................................................... 2-10 2.3.4 Extragalactic Sources ................................................................................................................ 2-10 2.3.5 Summary of Observing Protocols .............................................................................................. 2-11 2.3.6 Summary of Preparatory Science Recommendations ............................................................... 2-12 3 Design Reference Mission ................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Key System Performance Parameters ..................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Integration Times ..................................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 Target Lists .............................................................................................................................................. 3-4 3.3.1 Candidate Earth Twins ................................................................................................................ 3-4 3.3.2 Known RV Planets ....................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.3.3 Jupiter Twin Survey ..................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.4 Observing Sequence ................................................................................................................................ 3-6 3.5 Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 3-7 i Exo-S STDT Interim Report Table of Contents 4 Baseline Design ................................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Mission Design ......................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Telescope Spacecraft .............................................................................................................................. 4-3 4.2.1 Telescope .................................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.2.2 Instrument .................................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.2.3 Formation Sensing and Control ................................................................................................... 4-5 4.2.4 Telescope Bus ............................................................................................................................. 4-6 4.3 Starshade Spacecraft Design................................................................................................................... 4-7 4.3.1 Starshade Optical Design ............................................................................................................ 4-7 4.3.2 Starshade Beacon ....................................................................................................................... 4-8 4.3.3 Starshade Mechanical Design ..................................................................................................... 4-8 4.3.4 Starshade Bus ........................................................................................................................... 4-13 5 Baseline Implementation .....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Agb Newsletter
    THE AGB NEWSLETTER An electronic publication dedicated to Asymptotic Giant Branch stars and related phenomena Official publication of the IAU Working Group on Red Giants and Supergiants No. 276 — 1 July 2020 https://www.astro.keele.ac.uk/AGBnews Editors: Jacco van Loon, Ambra Nanni and Albert Zijlstra Editorial Board (Working Group Organising Committee): Marcelo Miguel Miller Bertolami, Carolyn Doherty, JJ Eldridge, Anibal Garc´ıa-Hern´andez, Josef Hron, Biwei Jiang, Tomasz Kami´nski, John Lattanzio, Emily Levesque, Maria Lugaro, Keiichi Ohnaka, Gioia Rau, Jacco van Loon (Chair) Figure 1: The Cat’s Eye Planetary Nebula imaged by Mark Hanson at Stan Watson Observatory with a 24′′ f6.7 teelescope. It includes 23 hours worth of [O iii]. The best known part, the “eye” is just the small object in the middle, while the messy halo extends much further. Notice also the bowshock on the right. (Suggestion by Sakib Rasool.) 1 Editorial Dear Colleagues, It is a pleasure to present you the 276th issue of the AGB Newsletter. Note that IAU Symposium 366 (”The Origin of Outflows in Evolved Stars”) has been postponed until November next year, while in June 2021 there will be a 4-week programme of workshops on stellar astrophysics in the Gaia era, in Munich (Germany). See the announcements for both meetings at the end of the newsletter. Unfortunately our proposal for a Focus Meeting at next year’s IAU General Assembly was not successful. One of the reasons given was: ”Some evaluators commented that Most of the topics in this proposal could have been made 10 or 20 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets
    Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets1 R. P. Butler2, J. T. Wright3, G. W. Marcy3,4, D. A Fischer3,4, S. S. Vogt5, C. G. Tinney6, H. R. A. Jones7, B. D. Carter8, J. A. Johnson3, C. McCarthy2,4, A. J. Penny9,10 ABSTRACT We present a catalog of nearby exoplanets. It contains the 172 known low- mass companions with orbits established through radial velocity and transit mea- surements around stars within 200 pc. We include 5 previously unpublished exo- planets orbiting the stars HD 11964, HD 66428, HD 99109, HD 107148, and HD 164922. We update orbits for 90 additional exoplanets including many whose orbits have not been revised since their announcement, and include radial ve- locity time series from the Lick, Keck, and Anglo-Australian Observatory planet searches. Both these new and previously published velocities are more precise here due to improvements in our data reduction pipeline, which we applied to archival spectra. We present a brief summary of the global properties of the known exoplanets, including their distributions of orbital semimajor axis, mini- mum mass, and orbital eccentricity. Subject headings: catalogs — stars: exoplanets — techniques: radial velocities 1Based on observations obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated jointly by the Uni- versity of California and the California Institute of Technology. The Keck Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. arXiv:astro-ph/0607493v1 21 Jul 2006 2Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institute of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, DC 20015-1305 3Department of Astronomy, 601 Campbell Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132 5UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 6Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping.
    [Show full text]
  • Starshade Exoplanet Data Challenge
    Starshade exoplanet data challenge a,b, a,c a Renyu Hu , * Sergi R. Hildebrandt , Mario Damiano, a a a Stuart Shaklan , Stefan Martin , and Doug Lisman a Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States b California Institute of Technology, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, Pasadena, California, United States c California Institute of Technology, Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, Pasadena, California, United States Abstract. Starshade in formation flight with a space telescope is a rapidly maturing technology that would enable imaging and spectral characterization of small planets orbiting nearby stars in the not-too-distant future. While performance models of starshade-assisted exoplanet imaging have been developed and used to design future missions, their results have not been verified from the analyses of synthetic images. Following a rich history of using community data challenges to evaluate image-processing capabilities in astronomy and exoplanet fields, the Starshade Technology Development to TRL5 (S5), a focused technology development activity managed by the NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program, is organizing and implementing a starshade exo- planet data challenge. The purpose of the data challenge is to validate the flow down of require- ments from science to key instrument performance parameters and to quantify the required accuracy of noisy background calibration with synthetic images. This data challenge distin- guishes itself from past efforts in the exoplanet field in that (1) it focuses on the detection and spectral characterization of small planets in the habitable zones of nearby stars, and (2) it devel- ops synthetic images that simultaneously include multiple background noise terms—some observations specific to starshade—including residual starlight, solar glint, exozodiacal light, detector noise, as well as variability resulting from starshade’s motion and telescope jitter.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrophysics Division Astrophysics Douglas Hudgins Program Scientist, Exoplanet Exploration Program Key NASA/SMD Science Themes
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA and the Search for Life on Planets around Other Stars A presentation to the National Academies Committee on Exoplanet Science Strategy 6 March 2018 Paul Hertz Director, Astrophysics Division Astrophysics Douglas Hudgins Program Scientist, Exoplanet Exploration Program Key NASA/SMD Science Themes Protect and Improve Life on Earth Search for Life Elsewhere Discover the Secrets of the Universe 2 Talk summary 3 NASA’s Exoplanet Exploration Program Space Missions and Mission Studies Public Communications Kepler, WFIRST Decadal Studies K2 Starshade Coronagraph Supporting Research & Technology Key Sustaining Research NASA Exoplanet Science Institute Technology Development Coronagraph Masks Large Binocular Keck Single Aperture Telescope Interferometer Imaging and RV High-Contrast Deployable Archives, Tools, Sagan Fellowships, Imaging Starshades Professional Engagement NN-EXPLORE https://exoplanets.nasa.gov 4 Foundational Documents for the NASA’s Astrophysics Division 5 NASA’s cross-divisional Search for Life Elsewhere ASTROPHYSICS • Exoplanet detection and Planetary SCIENCE/ characterization ASTROBIOLOGY • Stellar characterization • Comparative planetology • Mission data analysis • Planetary atmospheres Hubble, Spitzer, Kepler, • Assessment of observable TESS, JWST, WFIRST, biosignatures etc. • Habitability EARTH SCIENCES • GCM • Planets as systems PLANETARY SCIENCE RESEARCH HELIOPHYSICS • Exoplanet characterization • Stellar characterization • Protoplanetary disks • Stellar winds • Planet formation • Detection of planetary • Comparative planetology magnetospheres 6 Exoplanet Exploration at NASA 2007 - present 7 The Spitzer Space Telescope For the last decade, the Spitzer Space Telescope has used both spectroscopic and photometric measurements in the mid-IR to probe exoplanets and exoplanetary systems. • Spitzer follow up observations of known transiting systems have revealed additional, new planets and helped refine measurements of the size and orbital dynamics of known planets as small as the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Brief History of Beiji (Northern Culmen)”
    “A Brief History of Beiji (Northern Culmen)” (Prepared for the 4th International Conference on the Inspiration of Astronomical Phenomena INSAP IV, Oxford University, August 3-9, 2003.) David W. Pankenier Lehigh University Abstract: In ancient Chinese astral lore, the imperial nomenclature associated with the circumpolar stars in the Palace of Purple Tenuity points to the crucial importance of the north-pole in astrological, calendrical, and spiritual contexts. But preoccupation with this numinous region has a history far longer than the Chinese empire, founded in 221 BCE. This paper briefly surveys what is known about the pre-imperial history of the region of the ‘Northern Culmen,’ with particular reference to spiritual and metaphysical conceptions relating to the Northern Dipper, and to the void at the pivot of the heavens which lacked a pole star throughout much of the formative period of classical Chinese civilization. The discussion concludes with a hypothesis about the astral origins of the ancient form of the character used to denote the High God di. Chinese preoccupation with astronomical orientation has a very long history. Archaeological evidence from the 5th millennium BCE Neolithic cultures of North China shows that burials and dwellings were already being oriented with particular attention to the diurnal and seasonal variations in the Sun’s position.1 By the early Bronze Age in the early 2nd millennium BCE and the inception of early state formation, such concepts had progressed to the point where ritually and politically important structures were uniformly quadrilateral in shape, and cardinally oriented, with the longitudinal axis aligned with some precision in a north-south direction.2 Palatial structures and royal tombs from the earliest dynastic states in the 2nd millennium BCE, that is, Xia, Shang, and Zhou, consistently display such orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2105.11583V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 2 Jul 2021 Keck-HIRES, APF-Levy, and Lick-Hamilton Spectrographs
    Draft version July 6, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The California Legacy Survey I. A Catalog of 178 Planets from Precision Radial Velocity Monitoring of 719 Nearby Stars over Three Decades Lee J. Rosenthal,1 Benjamin J. Fulton,1, 2 Lea A. Hirsch,3 Howard T. Isaacson,4 Andrew W. Howard,1 Cayla M. Dedrick,5, 6 Ilya A. Sherstyuk,1 Sarah C. Blunt,1, 7 Erik A. Petigura,8 Heather A. Knutson,9 Aida Behmard,9, 7 Ashley Chontos,10, 7 Justin R. Crepp,11 Ian J. M. Crossfield,12 Paul A. Dalba,13, 14 Debra A. Fischer,15 Gregory W. Henry,16 Stephen R. Kane,13 Molly Kosiarek,17, 7 Geoffrey W. Marcy,1, 7 Ryan A. Rubenzahl,1, 7 Lauren M. Weiss,10 and Jason T. Wright18, 19, 20 1Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2IPAC-NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 4Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 5Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 6Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA 7NSF Graduate Research Fellow 8Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 9Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 10Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai`i,
    [Show full text]
  • Exep Science Plan Appendix (SPA) (This Document)
    ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 1 of 61 Created By: David A. Breda Date Program TDEM System Engineer Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Nick Siegler Date Program Chief Technologist Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Concurred By: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology EXOPDr.LANET Douglas Hudgins E XPLORATION PROGRAMDate Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program ScienceScience Plan Mission DirectorateAppendix NASA Headquarters Karl Stapelfeldt, Program Chief Scientist Eric Mamajek, Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 JPL Document No: 1735632 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 2 of 61 Approved by: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager, Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory Dr. Douglas Hudgins Date Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters Created by: Dr. Karl Stapelfeldt Chief Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Eric Mamajek Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. © 2018 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 3 of 61 Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlations Between the Stellar, Planetary, and Debris Components of Exoplanet Systems Observed by Herschel⋆
    A&A 565, A15 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323058 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Correlations between the stellar, planetary, and debris components of exoplanet systems observed by Herschel J. P. Marshall1,2, A. Moro-Martín3,4, C. Eiroa1, G. Kennedy5,A.Mora6, B. Sibthorpe7, J.-F. Lestrade8, J. Maldonado1,9, J. Sanz-Forcada10,M.C.Wyatt5,B.Matthews11,12,J.Horner2,13,14, B. Montesinos10,G.Bryden15, C. del Burgo16,J.S.Greaves17,R.J.Ivison18,19, G. Meeus1, G. Olofsson20, G. L. Pilbratt21, and G. J. White22,23 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 15 November 2013 / Accepted 6 March 2014 ABSTRACT Context. Stars form surrounded by gas- and dust-rich protoplanetary discs. Generally, these discs dissipate over a few (3–10) Myr, leaving a faint tenuous debris disc composed of second-generation dust produced by the attrition of larger bodies formed in the protoplanetary disc. Giant planets detected in radial velocity and transit surveys of main-sequence stars also form within the protoplanetary disc, whilst super-Earths now detectable may form once the gas has dissipated. Our own solar system, with its eight planets and two debris belts, is a prime example of an end state of this process. Aims. The Herschel DEBRIS, DUNES, and GT programmes observed 37 exoplanet host stars within 25 pc at 70, 100, and 160 μm with the sensitiv- ity to detect far-infrared excess emission at flux density levels only an order of magnitude greater than that of the solar system’s Edgeworth-Kuiper belt. Here we present an analysis of that sample, using it to more accurately determine the (possible) level of dust emission from these exoplanet host stars and thereafter determine the links between the various components of these exoplanetary systems through statistical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Today in Astronomy 106: Exoplanets
    Today in Astronomy 106: exoplanets The successful search for extrasolar planets Prospects for determining the fraction of stars with planets, and the number of habitable planets per planetary system (fp and ne). T. Pyle, SSC/JPL/Caltech/NASA. 26 May 2011 Astronomy 106, Summer 2011 1 Observing exoplanets Stars are vastly brighter and more massive than planets, and most stars are far enough away that the planets are lost in the glare. So astronomers have had to be more clever and employ the motion of the orbiting planet. The methods they use (exoplanets detected thereby): Astrometry (0): tiny wobble in star’s motion across the sky. Radial velocity (399): tiny wobble in star’s motion along the line of sight by Doppler shift. Timing (9): tiny delay or advance in arrival of pulses from regularly-pulsating stars. Gravitational microlensing (10): brightening of very distant star as it passes behind a planet. 26 May 2011 Astronomy 106, Summer 2011 2 Observing exoplanets (continued) Transits (69): periodic eclipsing of star by planet, or vice versa. Very small effect, about like that of a bug flying in front of the headlight of a car 10 miles away. Imaging (11 but 6 are most likely to be faint stars): taking a picture of the planet, usually by blotting out the star. Of these by far the most useful so far has been the combination of radial-velocity and transit detection. Astrometry and gravitational microlensing of sufficient precision to detect lots of planets would need dedicated, specialized observatories in space. Imaging lots of planets will require 30-meter-diameter telescopes for visible and infrared wavelengths.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet.Eu Catalog Page 1 # Name Mass Star Name
    exoplanet.eu_catalog # name mass star_name star_distance star_mass OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L b 13.6 OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L 4500.0 0.048 11 Com b 19.4 11 Com 110.6 2.7 11 Oph b 21 11 Oph 145.0 0.0162 11 UMi b 10.5 11 UMi 119.5 1.8 14 And b 5.33 14 And 76.4 2.2 14 Her b 4.64 14 Her 18.1 0.9 16 Cyg B b 1.68 16 Cyg B 21.4 1.01 18 Del b 10.3 18 Del 73.1 2.3 1RXS 1609 b 14 1RXS1609 145.0 0.73 1SWASP J1407 b 20 1SWASP J1407 133.0 0.9 24 Sex b 1.99 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 24 Sex c 0.86 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 2M 0103-55 (AB) b 13 2M 0103-55 (AB) 47.2 0.4 2M 0122-24 b 20 2M 0122-24 36.0 0.4 2M 0219-39 b 13.9 2M 0219-39 39.4 0.11 2M 0441+23 b 7.5 2M 0441+23 140.0 0.02 2M 0746+20 b 30 2M 0746+20 12.2 0.12 2M 1207-39 24 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1207-39 b 4 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1938+46 b 1.9 2M 1938+46 0.6 2M 2140+16 b 20 2M 2140+16 25.0 0.08 2M 2206-20 b 30 2M 2206-20 26.7 0.13 2M 2236+4751 b 12.5 2M 2236+4751 63.0 0.6 2M J2126-81 b 13.3 TYC 9486-927-1 24.8 0.4 2MASS J11193254 AB 3.7 2MASS J11193254 AB 2MASS J1450-7841 A 40 2MASS J1450-7841 A 75.0 0.04 2MASS J1450-7841 B 40 2MASS J1450-7841 B 75.0 0.04 2MASS J2250+2325 b 30 2MASS J2250+2325 41.5 30 Ari B b 9.88 30 Ari B 39.4 1.22 38 Vir b 4.51 38 Vir 1.18 4 Uma b 7.1 4 Uma 78.5 1.234 42 Dra b 3.88 42 Dra 97.3 0.98 47 Uma b 2.53 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma c 0.54 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma d 1.64 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 51 Eri b 9.1 51 Eri 29.4 1.75 51 Peg b 0.47 51 Peg 14.7 1.11 55 Cnc b 0.84 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc c 0.1784 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc d 3.86 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc e 0.02547 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc f 0.1479 55
    [Show full text]
  • Ghost Imaging of Space Objects
    Ghost Imaging of Space Objects Dmitry V. Strekalov, Baris I. Erkmen, Igor Kulikov, and Nan Yu Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109-8099 USA NIAC Final Report September 2014 Contents I. The proposed research 1 A. Origins and motivation of this research 1 B. Proposed approach in a nutshell 3 C. Proposed approach in the context of modern astronomy 7 D. Perceived benefits and perspectives 12 II. Phase I goals and accomplishments 18 A. Introducing the theoretical model 19 B. A Gaussian absorber 28 C. Unbalanced arms configuration 32 D. Phase I summary 34 III. Phase II goals and accomplishments 37 A. Advanced theoretical analysis 38 B. On observability of a shadow gradient 47 C. Signal-to-noise ratio 49 D. From detection to imaging 59 E. Experimental demonstration 72 F. On observation of phase objects 86 IV. Dissemination and outreach 90 V. Conclusion 92 References 95 1 I. THE PROPOSED RESEARCH The NIAC Ghost Imaging of Space Objects research program has been carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech. The program consisted of Phase I (October 2011 to September 2012) and Phase II (October 2012 to September 2014). The research team consisted of Drs. Dmitry Strekalov (PI), Baris Erkmen, Igor Kulikov and Nan Yu. The team members acknowledge stimulating discussions with Drs. Leonidas Moustakas, Andrew Shapiro-Scharlotta, Victor Vilnrotter, Michael Werner and Paul Goldsmith of JPL; Maria Chekhova and Timur Iskhakov of Max Plank Institute for Physics of Light, Erlangen; Paul Nu˜nez of Coll`ege de France & Observatoire de la Cˆote d’Azur; and technical support from Victor White and Pierre Echternach of JPL.
    [Show full text]