DOCSLIB.ORG

A Global Catalog of Primary Reptile Type Specimens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Title A global catalog of primary reptile type specimens Authors Campbell, P; Uetz, P; CHERIKH, SAMI; Shea, G; Ineich, I; Doronin, I; ROSADO, J; WYNN, A; TIGHE, KA; MCDIARMID, R; Lee, JL; KÖHLER, G; Ellis, R; Doughty, P; RAXWORTHY, CJ; SCHEINBERG, L; RESETAR, A; SABAJ, M; SCHNEIDER, G; Franzen, M; Glaw, F; BÖHME, W; SCHWEIGER, S; GEMEL, R; COUPER, P; AMEY, A; DONDORP, E; OFER, G; MEIRI, S; WALLACH, V Date Submitted 2019-12 See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337197148 A global catalog of primary reptile type specimens Article in Zootaxa · November 2019 DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4695.5.2 CITATIONS READS 0 100 30 authors, including: Peter Uetz Glenn Shea Virginia Commonwealth University The University of Sydney 244 PUBLICATIONS 11,003 CITATIONS 95 PUBLICATIONS 1,050 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Patrick Campbell Justin L. Lee Natural History Museum, London University of Maryland, College Park 57 PUBLICATIONS 177 CITATIONS 16 PUBLICATIONS 21 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Systematics and Ecology of Guibemantis tree frogs from Madagascar View project Amphibians and reptiles of La Gamba, Costa Rica View project All content following this page was uploaded by Justin L. Lee on 15 November 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Zootaxa 4695 (5): 438–450 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4695.5.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:63068E23-DA14-418F-A9C3-B25AEA3DEF9D A global catalog of primary reptile type specimens PETER UETZ1,22, SAMI CHERIKH1, GLENN SHEA2, IVAN INEICH3, PATRICK D. CAMPBELL4, IGOR V. DORONIN5, JOSÉ ROSADO6, ADDISON WYNN7, KENNETH A. TIGHE7, ROY MCDIARMID7, JUSTIN L. LEE7, GUNTHER KÖHLER8, RYAN ELLIS9, PAUL DOUGHTY9, CHRISTOPHER J. RAXWORTHY10, LAUREN SCHEINBERG11, ALAN RESETAR12, MARK SABAJ13, GREG SCHNEIDER14, MICHAEL FRANZEN15, FRANK GLAW15, WOLFGANG BÖHME16, SILKE SCHWEIGER17, RICHARD GEMEL17, PATRICK COUPER18, ANDREW AMEY18, ESTHER DONDORP19, GALI OFER20, SHAI MEIRI20 & VAN WALLACH21 1Center for Biological Data Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 1 William St, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia, and Sydney School of Veteri- nary Science B01, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (MNHN), CNRS, Sorbonne Université, ISYEB (UMR 7205 MNHN/CNRS/UPMC/EPHE), Insti- tut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (Reptiles), 57 rue Cuvier, CP 30, 75251 Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected] 4The Natural History Museum (NHMUK), London SW7 5BD, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 5Department of Herpetology, Zoological Institute (ZISP), Russian Academy of Sciences, St.Petersburg 199034 Universitetskaya nab. 1, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 6Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ), 26 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 7Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013- 7012, USA. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 8Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Senckenberg (SMF), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt a.M., Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 9Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum (WAM), 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, Western Australia, 6016, Australia. E-mail:[email protected], [email protected] 10American Museum of Natural History (AMNH), Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024-5192, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 11California Academy of Sciences (CAS), 55 Music Concourse Drive, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 12Field Museum (FMNH), 1400 S. Lake Shore Dr., Chicago, IL 60605, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 13The Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University (ANSP), 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 14Research Museum Center, University of Michigan (UMMZ), 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 15Zoologische Staatssammlung München (ZSM-SNSB), Münchhausenstraße 21, 81247 München, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 16Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig (ZFMK), Section of Herpetology, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 17Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (NMW), Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 18Biodiversity, Queensland Museum (QM), PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 19Naturalis Biodiversity Center (RMNH), Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR Leiden, Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] 20School of Zoology and Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel-Aviv University (TAU), Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel. E-mail: [email protected] 214 Potter Park, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. 22Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We present information on primary type specimens for 13,282 species and subspecies of reptiles compiled in the Reptile Database, that is, holotypes, neotypes, lectotypes, and syntypes. These represent 99.4% of all 13,361 currently recognized taxa (11,050 species and 2311 subspecies). Type specimens of 653 taxa (4.9%) are either lost or not located, were never designated, or we did not find any information about them. 51 species are based on iconotypes. To map all types to physical 438 Accepted by S. Carranza: 23 Aug. 2019; published: 12 Nov. 2019 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 collections we have consolidated all synonymous and ambiguous collection acronyms into an unambiguous list of 364 collections holding these primary types. The 10 largest collections possess more than 50% of all (primary) reptile types, the 36 largest collections possess more than 10,000 types and the largest 73 collections possess over 90% of all types. Of the 364 collections, 107 hold type specimens of only 1 species or subspecies. Dozens of types are still in private collections. In order to increase their utility, we recommend that the description of type specimens be supplemented with data from high-resolution images and CT-scans, and clear links to tissue samples and DNA sequence data (when available). We request members of the herpetological community provide us with any missing type information to complete the list. Key words: syntype, holotype, neotype, lectotype, herpetological collections, squamata, serpentes, sauria, testudines Introduction Over the past 260+ years at least 22,000 reptile species and subspecies have been described. Of these, 13,361 taxa are considered valid today (11,050 species and 2,311 subspecies, not counting nominate subspecies) (Uetz et al. 2019; Uetz & Stylianou 2018). Under the rules of the International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature, for a new species to be considered valid it must have at least one type specimen (ICZN Articles 71–75, see also Du- bois 2017), even though other kinds of specific documentation such as illustrations (“iconotypes”), photographs or DNA-based information have been used and are extensively discussed in the literature (Chaladze 2017; Donegan 2008; Faundez 2017; Grandcolas 2017; Shatalkin & Galinskaya 2017; Zhang 2017). Nevertheless, physical type specimens remain a cornerstone and the gold standard of systematic biology, even as the type concept evolves with the addition of genome-sequence (Giribet 2016) or CT-microscan data (Broeckhoven et al. 2016). Early species descriptions often did not clearly identify a primary type specimen, a problem that continues to produce taxonomic confusion to the present day. Later, especially at the end of the 19th century, several type speci- mens of equal status (“syntypes”) were commonly used. This latter practice is now rarely used, due to the confu- sion arising when a series of syntypes was a composite of multiple species (a surprisingly common occurrence e.g. Böhme 2005). Currently, best taxonomic practice requires that a single specimen be designated as a holotype (typi- cally a voucher specimen, ideally with a tissue sample for DNA analysis), that is deposited in a public institution to guarantee easy scientific access. Ideally, additional specimens (paratypes) are nominated to represent ontogenetic, sexual, and intraspecific variation within a species, but paratypes are not considered here. Even when holotypes were designated and are still extant, older descriptions were often brief and insufficient by today’s standards, especially when species are later added to the same genus. Consequently, the original types must be revisited and often require redescription. While a type specimen provides a physical representation of the morphology of a species, an increasing num- ber of new species are described primarily based on DNA sequences and molecular phylogenetic methods, with a physical description being provided but not necessarily allowing distinction in the field or even in a collection. An evolutionary species concept may delineate separate populations that are morphologically diagnosable, but it says little
Recommended publications
  • Herpetological Journal SHORT NOTE

    Herpetological Journal SHORT NOTE

    Volume 28 (April 2018), 93-95 SHORT NOTE Herpetological Journal Published by the British Intersexuality in Helicops infrataeniatus Jan, 1865 Herpetological Society (Dipsadidae: Hydropsini) Ruth A. Regnet1, Fernando M. Quintela1, Wolfgang Böhme2 & Daniel Loebmann1 1Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Vertebrados. Av. Itália km 8, CEP: 96203-900, Vila Carreiros, Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil 2Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany Herein, we describe the first case of intersexuality in the are viviparous, and interestingly, H. angulatus exhibits Hydropsini tribe. After examination of 720 specimens both reproductive modes (Rossman, 1984; Aguiar & Di- of Helicops infrataeniatus Jan, 1865, we discovered Bernardo, 2005; Braz et al., 2016). Helicops infrataeniatus one individual that presented feminine and masculine has a wide distribution that encompasses south- reproductive features. The specimen was 619 mm long, southeastern Brazil, southern Paraguay, North-eastern with seven follicles in secondary stage, of different shapes Argentina and Uruguay (Deiques & Cechin, 1991; Giraudo, and sizes, and a hemipenis with 13.32 and 13.57 mm in 2001; Carreira & Maneyro, 2013). At the coastal zone of length. The general shape of this organ is similar to that southernmost Brazil, H. infrataeniatus is among the most observed in males, although it is smaller and does not abundant species in many types of limnic and estuarine present conspicuous spines along its body. Deformities environments (Quintela & Loebmann, 2009; Regnet found in feminine and masculine structures suggest that et al., 2017). In October 2015 at the Laranjal beach, this specimen might not be reproductively functional. municipality of Pelotas, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (31°46’S, 52°13’W), a remarkable aggregation of reptiles Key words: Follicles, hemipenis, hermaphroditism, water and caecilians occurred after a flood event associated to snake.
  • Supplemental Information Biological Conservation No Safe Haven: Protection Levels Show Imperilled South African Reptiles Not

    Supplemental Information Biological Conservation No Safe Haven: Protection Levels Show Imperilled South African Reptiles Not

    Supplemental Information Biological Conservation No safe haven: protection levels show imperilled South African reptiles not sufficiently safe- guarded despite low average extinction risk Krystal A. Tolley, Joshua Weeber, Bryan Maritz, Luke Verburgt, Michael F. Bates, Werner Conradie, Margaretha D. Hofmeyr, Andrew A. Turner, Jessica M. da Silva, Graham J. Alexander Supplemental Figures S1-S3 Figure S1. Species richness of threatened and Near Threatened reptiles in South Africa. 1 Figure S2. Reptile species richness in South Africa (darker shades indicate higher richness), with the current protected area network indicated by the black outlines. 2 Figure S3. Reptile species richness in South Africa (darker shades indicate higher richness), with the current protected area network indicated by the grey shaded polygons and the protected area expansion network indicated by black polygon outlines. 3 Appendix S1. Protocol for Measuring Protection Level for South African Reptiles The following process was applied to measure the level of protection for each species, using the interpreted distributions for the species (see main text). We evaluated the effectiveness of South Africa’s protected area network in ensuring that minimum viable populations of reptiles are protected. We set a conservation target for protection of at least 10 fragments of protected habitat, each with areas greater than 10 km2 (1000 ha) for a total of 100 km2 for each species. The fragment size was considered to be the minimum area that would support viable populations, with the total area considered to be the total area needed to safeguard the species survival into the future. The interpreted distributions for each species were then intersected with South Africa’s protected area network (Government of South Africa, 2010).
  • The Global Distribution of Tetrapods Reveals a Need for Targeted Reptile

    The Global Distribution of Tetrapods Reveals a Need for Targeted Reptile

    1 The global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for targeted reptile 2 conservation 3 4 Uri Roll#1,2, Anat Feldman#3, Maria Novosolov#3, Allen Allison4, Aaron M. Bauer5, Rodolphe 5 Bernard6, Monika Böhm7, Fernando Castro-Herrera8, Laurent Chirio9, Ben Collen10, Guarino R. 6 Colli11, Lital Dabool12 Indraneil Das13, Tiffany M. Doan14, Lee L. Grismer15, Marinus 7 Hoogmoed16, Yuval Itescu3, Fred Kraus17, Matthew LeBreton18, Amir Lewin3, Marcio Martins19, 8 Erez Maza3, Danny Meirte20, Zoltán T. Nagy21, Cristiano de C. Nogueira19, Olivier S.G. 9 Pauwels22, Daniel Pincheira-Donoso23, Gary Powney24, Roberto Sindaco25, Oliver Tallowin3, 10 Omar Torres-Carvajal26, Jean-François Trape27, Enav Vidan3, Peter Uetz28, Philipp Wagner5,29, 11 Yuezhao Wang30, C David L Orme6, Richard Grenyer✝1 and Shai Meiri✝*3 12 13 # Contributed equally to the paper 14 ✝ Contributed equally to the paper 15 * Corresponding author 16 17 Affiliations: 18 1 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX13QY, UK. 19 2 Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, 20 Ben-Gurion University, Midreshet Ben-Gurion 8499000, Israel. (Current address) 21 3 Department of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel. 22 4 Hawaii Biological Survey, 4 Bishop Museum, Honolulu, HI 96817, USA. 23 5 Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA. 24 6 Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus Silwood Park, 25 Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK 26 7 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, UK. 27 8 School of Basic Sciences, Physiology Sciences Department, Universidad del Valle, Colombia.
  • An Inventory of Online Reptile Images

    An Inventory of Online Reptile Images

    Zootaxa 0000 (0): 000–000 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.0000.0.0 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:00000000-0000-0000-0000-00000000000 An inventory of online reptile images BENJAMIN MICHAEL MARSHALL1*, PAUL FREED2, LAURIE J. VITT3, PEDRO BERNARDO4, GERNOT VOGEL5, SEBASTIAN LOTZKAT6, MICHAEL FRANZEN7, JAKOB HALLERMANN8, RICHARD D. SAGE9, BRIAN BUSH10, MARCELO RIBEIRO DUARTE11, LUCIANO JAVIER AVILA12, DAVID JANDZIK13, BORIS KLUSMEYER14, BRAD MARYAN15, JIŘÍ HOŠEK16, PETER UETZ17* 1Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9554-0605 2Scotts Mills, Oregon 97375, USA. �[email protected] 3Sam Noble Museum, Norman, Oklahoma 73072, USA. �[email protected] 4Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, ON, Canada. �[email protected] 5Society for Southeast Asian Herpetology, Heidelberg, Germany �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-518X 6Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8171-9321 7Zoologische Staatssammlung München (ZSM-SNSB), 81247 München, Germany. �[email protected] 8Universität Hamburg, Centrum für Naturkunde, Hamburg, Germany �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8835-9303 9Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, and Sociedad Naturalista Andino Patagónica (SNAP), S. C. de Bariloche, Río Negro, 8400, Argentina. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0897-6927 10Stoneville, WA, Australia. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3487-6620 11Instituto Butantan, Laboratório de Coleções Zoológicas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S

    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S

    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
  • Reptile Rap Newsletter of the South Asian Reptile Network ISSN 2230-7079 No.15 | January 2013 Date of Publication: 22 January 2013 1

    Reptile Rap Newsletter of the South Asian Reptile Network ISSN 2230-7079 No.15 | January 2013 Date of Publication: 22 January 2013 1

    Reptile Rap Newsletter of the South Asian Reptile Network No.15 | January 2013 ISSN 2230-7079 Date of publication: 22 January 2013 1. Crocodile, 1. 2. Crocodile, Caiman, 3. Gharial, 4.Common Chameleon, 5. Chameleon, 9. Chameleon, Flap-necked 8. Chameleon Flying 7. Gecko, Dragon, Ptychozoon Chamaeleo sp. Fischer’s 10 dilepsis, 6. &11. Jackson’s Frill-necked 21. Stump-tailed Skink, 20. Gila Monster, Lizard, Green Iguana, 19. European Iguana, 18. Rhinoceros Antillean Basilisk, Iguana, 17. Lesser 16. Green 15. Common Lizard, 14. Horned Devil, Thorny 13. 12. Uromastyx, Lizard, 34. Eastern Tortoise, 33. 32. Rattlesnake Indian Star cerastes, 22. 31. Boa,Cerastes 23. Python, 25. 24. 30. viper, Ahaetulla Grass Rhinoceros nasuta Snake, 29. 26. 27. Asp, Indian Naja Snake, 28. Cobra, haje, Grater African 46. Ceratophrys, Bombina,45. 44. Toad, 43. Bullfrog, 42. Frog, Common 41. Turtle, Sea Loggerhead 40. Trionychidae, 39. mata Mata 38. Turtle, Snake-necked Argentine 37. Emydidae, 36. Tortoise, Galapagos 35. Turtle, Box 48. Marbled Newt Newt, Crested 47. Great Salamander, Fire Reptiles, illustration by Adolphe Millot. Source: Nouveau Larousse Illustré, edited by Claude Augé, published in Paris by Librarie Larousse 1897-1904, this illustration from vol. 7 p. 263 7 p. vol. from 1897-1904, this illustration Larousse Librarie by published in Paris Augé, Claude by edited Illustré, Larousse Nouveau Source: Millot. Adolphe by illustration Reptiles, www.zoosprint.org/Newsletters/ReptileRap.htm OPEN ACCESS | FREE DOWNLOAD REPTILE RAP #15, January 2013 Contents A new record of the Cochin Forest Cane Turtle Vijayachelys silvatica (Henderson, 1912) from Shendurney Wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala, India Arun Kanagavel, 3–6pp New Record of Elliot’s Shieldtail (Gray, 1858) in Seshachalam Biosphere Reserve, Eastern Ghats, Andhra Pradesh, India M.
  • Reptiles and Amphibians of the Goegap Nature Reserve

    Reptiles and Amphibians of the Goegap Nature Reserve

    their time underground in burrows. These amphibians often leave their burrows after heavy rains that are seldom. Reptiles And Amphibians Of The There are reptiles included in this report, which don’t occur here in Goegap but at the Augrabies Falls NP. So you can find here also the Nile monitor and the flat liz- Goegap Nature Reserve ard. Measuring reptiles By Tanja Mahnkopf In tortoises and terrapins the length is measured at the shell. Straight along the mid- line of the carapace. The SV-Length is the length of head and body (Snout to Vent). In lizards it easier to look for this length because their tail may be a regenerated one Introduction and these are often shorter than the original one. The length that is mentioned for the The reptiles are an ancient class on earth. The earliest reptile fossils are about 315 species in this report is the average to the maximum length. For the snakes I tried to million years old. During the aeons of time they evolved a great diversity of extinct give the total length because it is often impossible to say where the tail begins and and living reptiles. The dinosaurs and their relatives dominated the earth 150 million the body ends without holding the snake. But there was not for every snake a total years ago. Our living reptiles are remnants of that period or from a period after the length available. dinosaurs were extinct. Except of the chameleons (there are only two) you can find all reptiles in the appen- Obviously it looks like reptiles are not as successful as mammals.
  • Description of a New Flat Gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique

    Description of a New Flat Gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320043814 Description of a new flat gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique Article in Zootaxa · September 2017 DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4324.1.8 CITATIONS READS 2 531 8 authors, including: William R Branch Jennifer Anna Guyton Nelson Mandela University Princeton University 250 PUBLICATIONS 4,231 CITATIONS 7 PUBLICATIONS 164 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Andreas Schmitz Michael Barej Natural History Museum of Geneva Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiver… 151 PUBLICATIONS 2,701 CITATIONS 38 PUBLICATIONS 274 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Monitoring and Managing Biodiversity Loss in South-East Africa's Montane Ecosystems View project Ad hoc herpetofauna observations View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jennifer Anna Guyton on 27 September 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Zootaxa 4324 (1): 142–160 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4324.1.8 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B4FF9A5F-94A7-4E75-9EC8-B3C382A9128C Description of a new flat gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique WILLIAM R. BRANCH1,2,13, JENNIFER A. GUYTON3, ANDREAS SCHMITZ4, MICHAEL F. BAREJ5, PIOTR NASKRECKI6,7, HARITH FAROOQ8,9,10,11, LUKE VERBURGT12 & MARK-OLIVER RÖDEL5 1Port Elizabeth Museum, P.O. Box 13147, Humewood 6013, South Africa 2Research Associate, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, P.O.
  • Diversity and Conservation of Amphibians and Reptiles in North Punjab, Pakistan

    Diversity and Conservation of Amphibians and Reptiles in North Punjab, Pakistan

    Diversity and conservation of amphibians and reptiles in North Punjab, Pakistan. MUHAMMAD RAIS, SARA BALOCH, JAVERIA REHMAN, MAQSOOD ANWAR, IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN AND TARIQ MAHMOOD Department of Wildlife Management, PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Corresponding Author: Muhammad Rais, Visiting Scholar, Department of Biology, Indiana-Purdue University Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT - Amphibians and reptiles are the most neglected and least studied wildlife groups in Pakistan. The present study was conducted in the selected areas of districts Rawalpindi, Islamabad and Chakwal, North Punjab, Pakistan, to obtain data on herpetofaunal species richness and abundance from February, 2010 to January, 2011 using area-constrained searches. A total of 35 species of amphibians and reptiles (29 genera, 16 families, four orders) were recorded from the study area. Of the recorded species, 30 were reptiles (25 genera, 13 families, three orders) and five were amphibians (four genera, three families and a single order). A total of 388 individuals belonging to 11 recognizable taxonomic units (RTUs) with a population density of 0.22 individuals/ ha. and 4.10 encounters were recorded. Of the recorded RTUs, two (lacertids and skinks) were rated as uncommon, seven (hard-shell turtles, soft-shell turtles, agamids, gekkonids, medium and large-sized lizards, non-venomous snakes and venomous snakes) as frequent and two (toads and frogs) as common. Districts Rawalpindi/ Islamabad had higher species richness while District Chakwal had relatively higher species diversity and evenness. Threatened species of the area included the Narrow-headed Soft-shell Turtle (Chitra indica), Indian Soft-shell Turtle (Nilssonia gangetica), Peacock Soft-shell Turtle (Aspideretes hurum), and Brown River Turtle (Pangshura smithii).
  • Preliminary Notes on the Monitor Lizards (Family: Varanidae) Within the National Zoological Gardens (NZG) Dehiwala, Colombo District, Sri Lanka

    Preliminary Notes on the Monitor Lizards (Family: Varanidae) Within the National Zoological Gardens (NZG) Dehiwala, Colombo District, Sri Lanka

    Biawak. 2008. 2(3): 109-118 © 2008 by International Varanid Interest Group Preliminary Notes on the Monitor Lizards (Family: Varanidae) within the National Zoological Gardens (NZG) Dehiwala, Colombo District, Sri Lanka D.M.S. SURANJAN KARUNARATHNA 1, A.A. THASUN AMARASINGHE 2, and ASHA DE VOS 3 1 The Young Zoologists’ Association of Sri Lanka, Department of National Zoological Gardens, Anagarika Dharmapala Mawatha, Dehiwala, Sri Lanka [email protected] 2 Taprobanica Nature Conservation Society, No: 146, Kendalanda, Homagama, Sri Lanka [email protected] 3 IUCN – International Union for Conservation of Nature, Sri Lanka Country office, No: 53, Horton place, Colombo 07, Sri Lanka [email protected] Introduction The monitor lizards, family Varanidae, are the largest of the extant lizards and show a uniformity of structure not seen in the other groups (Daniel, 2002; De Silva, 1998). The genus Varanus holds all 70 described species (De Lisle, pers. comm.; Halliday and Adler, 2002; Reptile Database, 2008). Monitors are distinguished by their long and flattened body, long tail, long neck and extremely elongated, slender, forked tongue similar to that of snakes (Pough et al., 2004). They have well developed eyelids and most have recurved teeth. Their head is covered with small scales, body covered with small round or oval scales and ventral scales arranged in regular rows (De Silva, 1996). Monitor lizards also have well developed limbs and their digits are armed with strong claws (Deraniyagala, 1953). They can be found in both aquatic and terrestrial habitats such as swamps, ditches, home gardens, streams, reservoirs, ponds, arboreal areas and mangroves (Gaulke and De Silva, 1997; Karunarathna et al., 2008a).
  • 2008 Board of Governors Report

    2008 Board of Governors Report

    American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Board of Governors Meeting Le Centre Sheraton Montréal Hotel Montréal, Quebec, Canada 23 July 2008 Maureen A. Donnelly Secretary Florida International University Biological Sciences 11200 SW 8th St. - OE 167 Miami, FL 33199 [email protected] 305.348.1235 31 May 2008 The ASIH Board of Governor's is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, 23 July 2008 from 1700- 1900 h in Salon A&B in the Le Centre Sheraton, Montréal Hotel. President Mushinsky plans to move blanket acceptance of all reports included in this book. Items that a governor wishes to discuss will be exempted from the motion for blanket acceptance and will be acted upon individually. We will cover the proposed consititutional changes following discussion of reports. Please remember to bring this booklet with you to the meeting. I will bring a few extra copies to Montreal. Please contact me directly (email is best - [email protected]) with any questions you may have. Please notify me if you will not be able to attend the meeting so I can share your regrets with the Governors. I will leave for Montréal on 20 July 2008 so try to contact me before that date if possible. I will arrive late on the afternoon of 22 July 2008. The Annual Business Meeting will be held on Sunday 27 July 2005 from 1800-2000 h in Salon A&C. Please plan to attend the BOG meeting and Annual Business Meeting. I look forward to seeing you in Montréal. Sincerely, Maureen A. Donnelly ASIH Secretary 1 ASIH BOARD OF GOVERNORS 2008 Past Presidents Executive Elected Officers Committee (not on EXEC) Atz, J.W.
  • Tigerpaper 38-4.Pmd

    Tigerpaper 38-4.Pmd

    REGIONAL OFFICE FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC (RAP), BANGKOK October-December 2011 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Regional Quarterly Bulletin on Wildlife and National Parks Management Vol. XXXVIII : No. 4 Featuring Focus on Asia-Pacific Forestry Week 2011 Vol. XXV: No. 4 Contents Pakke Tiger Reserve: An Overview...................................... 1 Scientific approach for tiger conservation in the Sundarbans... 5 A dragon-fly preys on dragonflies.........................................9 Study on commercially exported crab species and their ecology in Chilika Lake, Orissa, Sri Lanka.........................12 Urban wildlife: legal provisions for an interface zone..............16 Study of the reptilian faunal diversity of a fragmented forest patch in Kukulugala, Ratnapura district, Sri Lanka..............19 Status and distribution of Grey-crowned prinia in Chitwan National Park, Nepal....................................................... 28 REGIONAL OFFICE FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC TIGERPAPER is a quarterly news bulletin China hosts 24th session of the Asia-Pacific Forestry dedicated to the exchange of information Commission and 2nd Forestry Week................................. 1 relating to wildlife and national parks Opening Address by Eduardo Rojas-Briales.......................... 7 management for the Daily newsletter at Forestry Week........................................10 Asia-Pacific Region. Asia-Pacific Forestry Week Partner Events...........................12 ISSN 1014 - 2789 - Reflection Workshop of Kids-to-Forests