DOCSLIB.ORG

Fifteen Case Studies Undertaken As Part of the Scishops.Eu Horizon 2020 Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fifteen Case Studies Undertaken As Part of the Scishops.Eu Horizon 2020 Project ENHANCING THE RESPONSIBLE AND SUSTAINABLE EXPANSION OF THE SCIENCE SHOPS ECOSYSTEM IN EUROPE D2.2 Existing RRI tools and successful participatory community-based research case studies report This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No 741657. D2.2 Existing RRI tools and successful participatory community-based research case studies report 2 Project Acronym: SciShops.eu Title: Enhancing the Responsible and Sustainable Expansion of the Science Shops Ecosystem in Europe Coordinator: SYNYO GmbH Reference: 741657 Type: Research and Innovation Action Program: HORIZON 2020 Theme: Participatory research and innovation via Science Shops Start: 01. September 2017 Duration: 30 months Website: project.scishops.eu Consortium: SYNYO GmbH (SYNYO), Austria Handelsblatt Research Institute GmbH, Germany University of Hohenheim, Germany KPMG Limited, Cyprus The National Unions of Students in Europe, Belgium Institute of Social Innovations, Lithuania University of Oxford, United Kingdom Katholieke Universiteit, Belgium Universidad Carlos III De Madrid, Spain Universitatea Politehnica Din Bucuresti, Romania Universitá degli Studi di Brescia, Italy Universiteit Leiden, Netherlands International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Spain Institute Jozef Stefan, Slovenia Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Germany Vetenskap & Allmänhet, Sweden Bay Zoltán Nonprofit Ltd. For Applied Research, Hungary SciCo Cyprus, Cyprus © 2018 SciShops | Horizon 2020 – SwafS-01-2016 | 741657 D2.2 Existing RRI tools and successful participatory community-based research case studies report 3 Deliverable Number: D2.2 Title: Existing RRI tools and successful participatory community-based research case studies report Lead beneficiary: VA (Public & Science) Work package: WP2 Dissemination level: Public (PU) Nature: Report (RE) Due date: 31.01.2018 Submission date: 31.01.2018 Authors: Helen Garrison, VA Contributors: Ingrida Gečienė, SII Laima Nevinskaitė, SII Jan Kleibrink, HRI Review: Giovanna Grossi, UNIBS Martin Bergman, VA Acknowledgement: This project has received Disclaimer: The content of this publication is the funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 sole responsibility of the authors, and in no way Research and Innovation Programme under Grant represents the view of the European Commission or Agreement No 700583. its services. © 2018 SciShops | Horizon 2020 – SwafS-01-2016 | 741657 D2.2 Existing RRI tools and successful participatory community-based research case studies report 4 Executive summary In order to be able to develop new science shops, it is important to learn from existing models and practices in community-based participatory research. At the core of this report are fifteen case studies undertaken as part of the SciShops.eu Horizon 2020 project. The fifteen case studies represent a broad range of different models of community-based participatory research. The selection includes different types of organisations (non-profit, university-based, research institutes) from different parts of Europe and beyond at different stages of establishment (from young, new initiatives to well-established ones). Some feature traditional science shops, others work with innovative formats such as a pop-up model and an e-science shop based at an online university. Some organisations do not call themselves science shops but undertake community-based participatory research too. The case studies investigate aspects such as business models, how the organisations undertake community-based participatory research, examples of research projects, relationships with community organisations and other stakeholders, how work and impact is monitored and evaluated, as well as Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) practices. Most importantly, the interviews explore factors that determine the success of community-based participatory research as well as challenges faced by the organisations. The case studies are based on one-hour interviews undertaken with representatives of the fifteen organisations. An interview guide was used to guide the conversations. Sustainability remains the greatest challenge science shops face, mainly due to funding insecurity and changing circumstances. Science shops need to be prepared to adapt and find new funding sources and partners if required. The case studies demonstrate a wide range of research interests, business models, regions and practices that reflect the variety of work undertaken by science shops in Europe and beyond. A key learning from this is that there is no single model a science shop must adopt in order to operate successfully but science shops should build on their own strengths and existing resources. The report also contains a set of RRI (Responsible Research and Innovation) tools of relevance to science shops and provides context to the RRI agenda in relation to science shops. The tools are categorised according to key dimensions of RRI (such as ethics, gender equality, open access, public engagement, science education and governance) as well as the various activities undertaken by science shops as part of community-based participatory research, including project definition and implementation, evaluation and dissemination. A core source of tools has been the RRI Toolkit, developed as part of the EU RRI Tools FP7-project. By investigating the current RRI practices of science shops through the case studies as well as the diverse range of RRI resources and tools available, it is clear that there are opportunities for science shops to embrace more RRI methodologies and practices to make their community-based participatory research even more participatory and responsible. © 2018 SciShops | Horizon 2020 – SwafS-01-2016 | 741657 D2.2 Existing RRI tools and successful participatory community-based research case studies report 5 Table of Content 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Approach and methodology for case studies .................................................................................. 8 3 Case Studies ..................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Science Shop Language, Culture, Communication, University of Groningen, the Netherlands ................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.2. European University Cyprus Science Shop ............................................................................ 13 3.3. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC) Science Shop, Spain ............................................... 17 3.4. InterMEDIU Bucharest, Romania .......................................................................................... 19 3.5. UTS Shopfront Community Program, Australia ..................................................................... 22 3.6. Interchange, Liverpool, UK .................................................................................................... 27 3.7. Adam Mickiewicz University’s Science Shop Poznań, Poland ............................................... 30 3.8. Malmö University’s Pop-Up Science Shop, Sweden .............................................................. 33 3.9. The Research Shop, University of Guelph, Canada ............................................................... 37 3.10. Living Lab for Health, Spain ................................................................................................... 42 3.11. Bonn Science Shop, Germany ................................................................................................ 46 3.12. Wissenschaftsladen Potsdam, Germany ............................................................................... 50 3.13. Institut für gesellschaftswissenschaftliche Forschung, Bildung & Information (FBI), Austria... ............................................................................................................................................... 54 3.14. Institute of Social Innovations Science Shop, Lithuania ........................................................ 57 3.15. Ibercivis Foundation, Spain ................................................................................................... 60 4 Conclusions from case studies ...................................................................................................... 65 4.1. Business models .................................................................................................................... 65 4.2. Research process and relationship with stakeholders .......................................................... 67 4.3. Future developments ............................................................................................................ 69 5 RRI and SciShops.eu ...................................................................................................................... 70 5.1. What is RRI? ........................................................................................................................... 70 5.2. The relevance of RRI to science shops and community-based participatory research......... 71 5.3. Public engagement ................................................................................................................ 71 5.4. Science education and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BRINGING RESEARCH INTO the CLASSROOM T H E C I T I Z E N S C I E N C E a P P R O a C H I N S C H O O L S a SCIENTIX OBSERVATORY REPORT - APRIL 2019
    BRINGING RESEARCH INTO THE CLASSROOM THE CITIZEN SCIENCE APPROACH IN SCHOOLS A SCIENTIX OBSERVATORY REPORT - APRIL 2019 B R T E C Scientix, the community for science education in Europe, facilitates regular dissemination and sharing of know-how and best practices in science education across the European Union (http://scientix.eu). In order to help the development and dissemination of different science education projects Scientix has set up the Scientix observatory which provides overviews on the state of play of different topics related to science education (http://www.scientix.eu/observatory). Publisher: European Schoolnet Please cite this publication as: Nistor, A. et al. (2019). Bringing Research into the Classroom – The Citizen Science approach in schools. Scientix Observatory report. April 2019, European Schoolnet, Brussels Keywords: Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM); Citizen Science; Participatory Science; School Education Authors: Nistor, A., Clemente-Gallardo, J., Angelopoulos, T., Chodzinska, K., Clemente-Gallardo, M., Gozdzik, A. , Gras-Velazquez, A., Grizelj, A., Kolenberg, K., Mitropoulou, D., Micallef Gatt, A. D., Tasiopoulou, E., Brunello, A., Echard, P., Arvaniti, V., Carroll, S., Cindea, N., Diamantopoulos, N., Duquenne, N. , Edrisy, S., Ferguson, E., Galani, L., Glezou, K., Kameas, A., Kirmaci, H., Koliakou, I., Konomi, E., Kontopidi, E., Kulic, S., Lefkos, I., Nikoletakis, G., Siotou, E., Šimac, A., Sormani, F., Tramonti, M., Tsapara, M., Tsourlidaki, E., Vojinovic, M. Design/DTP: Vanessa James Picture credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay Print run: 500 ISBN: 9789492913852 Published in April 2019. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of EUN Partnership AISBL or the European Commission. The work presented in this document is supported by the European Commission’s Erasmus+ programme – project BRITEC, coordinated by the Institute of Geophysics, PAS and by the European Union’s H2020 research and innovation programme – project Scientix 3 (Grant agreement N.
    [Show full text]
  • EDGES Project Meeting
    International Desktop Grid Federation - Support Project Contract number: FP7-312297 Desktop Grids for e-Science Road Map Project deliverable: D5.5.1 Due date of deliverable: 2013-10-31 Actual submission date: 2013-12-27 Lead beneficiary: AlmereGrid Workpackage: WP5 Dissemination Level: PU Version: 1.2 (Final) IDGF-SP is supported by the FP7 Capacities Programme under contract nr FP7-312297. D5.5.1 – Desktop Grids for e-Science Road Map CopyriGht (c) 2013. MemBers of IDGF-SP consortium, see http://IDGF-SP.eu for details on the copyriGht holders. You are permitted to copy and distriBute verBatim copies of this document containinG this copyriGht notice But modifyinG this document is not allowed. You are permitted to copy this document in whole or in part into other documents if you attach the followinG reference to the copied elements: ‘Copyright (c) 2013. Members of IDGF-SP consortium - http://IDGF-SP.eu’. The commercial use of any information contained in this document may require a license from the proprietor of that information. The IDGF-SP consortium memBers do not warrant that the information contained in the deliveraBle is capaBle of use, or that use of the information is free from risk, and accept no liaBility for loss or damaGe suffered By any person and orGanisation usinG this information. WP3 © 2013. Members of IDGF-SP consortium - http://IDGF-SP.eu 2/8 D5.5.1 – Desktop Grids for e-Science Road Map Table of Contents 1 Status and ChanGe History .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Science for Environmental Policy: Development of an EU-Wide Inventory and Analysis of Selected Practices
    Citizen science for environmental policy: Development of an EU-wide inventory and analysis of selected practices Bio Innovation Service, in collaboration with Fundación Ibercivis and The Natural History Museum Citizen science for environmental policy Disclaimer The information and views set out in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Project team Shailendra Mugdal (BIO Innovation Service) Anne Turbe (BIO Innovation Service) Francisco Sanz (Ibercivis) Jorge Barba (Ibercivis) Maite Pelacho (Ibercivis) Fermin Serrano-Sanz (Ibercivis) Lucy Robinson (Natural History Museum) Margaret Gold (Natural History Museum) Acknowledgments We would like to express our sincere thanks to all citizen science projects that invested their precious time in answering our questions, this study would not have been possible without their support. We also thank the colleagues at the European Commission: Sven Schade and Chrysi Tsinarki (JRC), José Miguel Rubio Iglesias (EEA); Marjan Van Merloo (DG RTD); Izabela Freytag (EASME); Liam Cashman (DG ENV); for their support and comments and Elena Montani (DG ENV) for overall guidance. Citation Bio Innovation Service (2018) Citizen science for environmental policy: development of an EU-wide inventory and analysis of selected practices. Final report for the European Commission, DG Environment under the contract 070203/2017/768879/ETU/ENV.A.3, in collaboration with Fundacion Ibercivis and The Natural History Museum, November 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Spotting – Let’S Fight Cancer Together!
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio Universidad de Zaragoza Image courtesy of the National Institutes Health (NIH) Scanning electron micrograph of an apoptotic HeLa cell Cell spotting – let’s fight cancer together! “Tell me and I forget, teach me and I HeLa cells may remember, involve me and I learn,” HeLa cells are a special hu- Benjamin Franklin once said. Make that man cell line. They originate from a woman called Hen- quote yours and involve your students in a rietta Lacks, who died from cervical cancer in 1951. Her real cancer-research project that will teach doctor took some cells from them more than just genetics and cell death. her tumour and managed to grow them in a culture me- dium, developing the first human cell line. HeLa cells By António J Monteiro, Cândida cells without harming healthy cells. are the most widely used G Silva and José C Villar Existing chemotherapy treatments human cells in biology labs have failed to reach that ideal level of BACKGROUND across the world. fficient cancer drugs need to selectivity, but many research teams E selectively destroy tumour continue to look for compounds that 46 I Science in School I Issue 31 : Spring 2015 www.scienceinschool.org Teach could become the effective and side- the response of HeLa cells to different Biology effect-free drugs of tomorrow. chemical compounds. Biology The search for suitable compounds The Cell Spotting project Technology is performed primarily by robotic Ages 14–18 The Cell Spotting team is testing systems that quickly test and identify This article describes a stu- more than 14 000 chemical com- millions of candidate chemical com- dent-centred activity that pounds in HeLa cells and observing pounds: they put cancer cells together introduces the concept of their reaction using advanced optical with potential drugs and observe efficient cancer drugs and microscopy techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Crowdsourced Drug Discovery: Start-Up of the Volunteer Computing Project Sidock@Home
    Toward crowdsourced drug discovery: start-up of the volunteer computing project SiDock@home Natalia Nikitina1[0000-0002-0538-2939] , Maxim Manzyuk2[000-0002-6628-0119], Marko Juki´c3;4[0000-0001-6083-5024], Crtomirˇ Podlipnik5[0000-0002-8429-0273], Ilya Kurochkin6[0000-0002-0399-6208], and Alexander Albertian6[0000-0002-6586-8930] 1 Institute of Applied Mathematical Research, Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk, Russia, [email protected] 2 Internet portal BOINC.ru, Moscow, Russia, [email protected] 3 Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia 4 Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia [email protected] 5 Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, [email protected] 6 Federal Research Center \Computer Science and Control" of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. In this paper, we describe the experience of setting up a computational infrastructure based on BOINC middleware and running a volunteer computing project on its basis. We characterize the first series of computational experiments and review the project's development in its first six months. The gathered experience shows that BOINC-based Desktop Grids allow to to efficiently aid drug discovery at its early stages. Keywords: Desktop Grid · Distributed computing · Volunteer comput- ing · BOINC · Virtual drug screening · Molecular docking · SARS-CoV-2 1 Introduction Among the variety of high-performance computing (HPC) systems, Desktop Grids hold a special place due to their enormous potential and, at the same time, high availability.
    [Show full text]
  • Desktop Grids for Escience
    Produced by the IDGF-SP project for the International Desktop Grid Federation A Road Map Desktop Grids for eScience Technical part – December 2013 IDGF/IDGF-SP International Desktop Grid federation http://desktopgridfederation.org Edited by Ad Emmen Leslie Versweyveld Contributions Robert Lovas Bernhard Schott Erika Swiderski Peter Hannape Graphics are produced by the projects. version 4.2 2013-12-27 © 2013 IDGF-SP Consortium: http://idgf-sp.eu IDGF-SP is supported by the FP7 Capacities Programme under contract nr RI-312297. Copyright (c) 2013. Members of IDGF-SP consortium, see http://degisco.eu/partners for details on the copyright holders. You are permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document containing this copyright notice but modifying this document is not allowed. You are permitted to copy this document in whole or in part into other documents if you attach the following reference to the copied elements: ‘Copyright (c) 2013. Members of IDGF-SP consortium - http://idgf-sp.eu’. The commercial use of any information contained in this document may require a license from the proprietor of that information. The IDGF-SP consortium members do not warrant that the information contained in the deliverable is capable of use, or that use of the information is free from risk, and accept no liability for loss or damage suffered by any person and organisation using this information. – 2 – Preface This document is produced by the IDGF-SP project for the International Desktop Grid Fe- deration. Please note that there are some links in this document pointing to the Desktop Grid Federation portal, that requires you to be signed in first.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Service and Desktop Grids for Scientific Computing
    Integrated Service and Desktop Grids for Scientific Computing Robert Lovas Computer and Automation Research Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary [email protected] Ad Emmen AlmereGrid, Almere, The Nederlands [email protected] RI-261561 GRID 2010, DUBNA Why Desktop Grids are important? http://knowledgebase.ehttp://knowledgebase.e--irg.euirg.eu RI-261561 GRID 2010, DUBNA Introduction RI-261561 WP4 Author: Robert Lovas, Ad Emmen version: 1.0 Prelude - what do people at home and SME’s think about grid computing Survey of EDGeS project Questionnaires all across Europe Get an idea of the interest in people and SMEs to donate computing time for science to a Grid Get an idea of the interest in running a Grid inside an SME RI-261561 GRID 2010, DUBNA Survey amongst the General Public and SME’s RI-261561 GRID 2010, DUBNA Opinions about Grid computing RI-261561 GRID 2010, DUBNA Survey - Conclusions Overall: there is interest in Desktop Grid computing in Europe. However, that people are willing to change their current practice and say that they want to participate in Grid efforts does not mean that they are actually going to do that. Need to generate trust in the organisation that manages the Grid. People want to donate computing time for scientific applications, especially medical applications. They do not like to donate computing time to commercial or defense applications. People want feedback on the application they are running. No clear technical barriers perceived by the respondents: so this does not need much attention. Overall the respondents were rather positive about donating computing time for a Grid or about running applications on a Grid.
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Volunteer Computing for Distributed Cryptanalysis
    ysis SecureVolunteer Computing for Distributed Cryptanal Nils Kopal Secure Volunteer Computing for Distributed Cryptanalysis ISBN 978-3-7376-0426-0 kassel university 9 783737 604260 Nils Kopal press kassel university press ! "# $ %& & &'& #( )&&*+ , #()&- ( ./0 12.3 - 4 # 5 (!!&& & 6&( 7"#&7&12./ 5 -839,:,3:3/,2;1/,2% ' 5 -839,:,3:3/,2;13,3% ,' 05( (!!<& &!.2&.81..!")839:3:3/2;133 "=( (!!, #& !(( (2221,;2;13/ '12.97 # ?@7 & &, & ) ? “With magic, you can turn a frog into a prince. With science, you can turn a frog into a Ph.D. and you still have the frog you started with.” Terry Pratchett Abstract Volunteer computing offers researchers and developers the possibility to distribute their huge computational jobs to the computers of volunteers. So, most of the overall cost for computational power and maintenance is spread across the volunteers. This makes it possible to gain computing resources that otherwise only expensive grids, clusters, or supercomputers offer. Most volunteer computing solutions are based on a client-server model. The server manages the distribution of subjobs to the computers of volunteers, the clients, which in turn compute the subjobs and return the results to the server. The Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC) is the most used middleware for volunteer computing. A drawback of any client-server architecture is the server being the single point of control and failure. To get rid of the single point of failure, we developed different distribution algorithms (epoch distribution algorithm, sliding-window distribution algorithm, and extended epoch distribution algorithm) based on unstructured peer-to-peer networks. These algorithms enable the researchers and developers to create volunteer computing networks without any central server.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Map (Update)
    International Desktop Grid Federation - Support Project Contract number: FP7-312297 Desktop Grids for e-Science Road Map (Update) Project deliverable: D5.5.2 CHAPTER 3 IDGF-SP is supported by the FP7 Capacities Programme under contract nr FP7-312297. D5.5.2 –Desktop Grids for e-Science Road Map Due date of deliverable: 2015-01-31 Actual submission date: 2015-01-31 Lead beneficiary: AlmereGrid Workpackage: WP5 Dissemination Level: PU Version: 1.0 (Draft) CHAPTER 3 Copyright (c) 2015. Members of IDGF-SP consortium, see http://IDGF-SP.eu for details on the copyright holders. You are permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document containing this copyright notice but modifying this document is not allowed. You are permitted to copy this document in whole or in part into other documents if you attach the following reference to the copied elements: ‘Copyright (c) 2015. Members of IDGF-SP consortium - http://IDGF-SP.eu’. The commercial use of any information contained in this document may require a license from the proprietor of that information. The IDGF-SP consortium members do not warrant that the information contained in the deliverable is capable of use, or that use of the information is free from risk, and accept no liability for loss or damage suffered by any person and organisation using this information. WP5 © 2015. Members of IDGF-SP consortium - http://IDGF-SP.eu 2/38 D5.5.2 –Desktop Grids for e-Science Road Map Table of Contents 1Communicating Crowd computing.........................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Projects on BONIC?
    PRESENTED BY: SAJIN GEORGE PRIYANKA ANGADI Overview of the talk ● GRID and Cluster computing and what are their differences. ● What is BOINC and how it works ? ● Key features of BOINC. ● Power consumption and Energy consumption. ● Projects that are currently using BOINC ● BONIC interface and Client Software. ● How to setup your own BOINC. GRID COMPUTING A distributed computing environment that uses its own resources to handle computational tasks. Grid VS Cluster Loosely coupled Tightly coupled systems (Decentralization) Single system image Diversity and Dynamism Centralized Job Distributed Job management & scheduling Management & scheduling system Volunteer computing. Volunteer computing is an arrangement in which people (volunteers) provide computing resources to projects, which use the resources to do distributed computing and/or storage. ● Volunteers are typically members of the general public who own Internet-connected PCs. Organizations such as schools and businesses may also volunteer the use of their computers. ● Projects are typically academic (university-based) and do scientific research. But there are exceptions; for example, GIMPS and distributed.net (two major projects) are not academic www.bonic.com What is B.O.I.N.C ? is a massive open-source grid computing tool by the university of berkeley. How BOINC works ? How the software works CREDIT The project's server keeps track of how much work your computer has done; this is called credit. To ensure that credit is granted fairly, most BOINC projects work as follows: ● Each task may be sent to two computers. ● When a computer reports a result, it claims a certain amount of credit, based on how much CPU time was used.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Home Teaching
    How many schools Spring 2015 Issue 31 and teachers do you reach – worldwide? In this issue: The challenging logistics of lunar exploration Also: Taking teaching home Advertising in Science in School · Choose between advertising in the quarterly print journal or on our website. · Website: reach over 50 000 global science educators per month. · In print: target over 5000 European science educators every quarter. · Distribute your flyers, brochures, CD-ROMs or other materials to our subscribers. For more details, see www.scienceinschool.org/advertising Published by EIROforum: ISSN: 1818-0353 Subscribe (free in Europe): www.scienceinschool.org Published and funded by EIROforum Editorial About Science in School The European journal for science teachers Science in School is the only teaching journal to cover all sciences and target the whole of Eu- st rope and beyond. Contents include cutting-edge Welcome to the 31 issue science, teaching materials and much more. Brought to you by Europe’s top scientific research institutes of Science in School Science in School is published and funded by EIROforum (www.eiroforum.org), a partnership between eight of Europe’s largest intergovern- mental scientific research organisations. ow the delighted mother of healthy twin boys, Inspiring science teachers worldwide I’m also happy to be back at Science in School, N The Science in School website offers articles working with Laura and Isabelle to continue their good in 30+ languages and is read worldwide. The work on the new design of our journal. free quarterly journal is printed in English and distributed across Europe. What is the purpose of Science in School? For the past nine years, we have aimed to inform, inspire and sup- Advertising: tailored to your needs port science teachers in Europe and beyond – and our Choose between advertising in our print journal, new website reflects just that.
    [Show full text]
  • Response Time Optimization of Multi-User BOINC Projects
    Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble UMR 5217 - CNRS, INPG, INRIA, UJF, UPMF Adresse : Inria Grenoble Rh^one-Alpes Inovall´ee T´el´ephone : (+33) 4 76 61 20 64 655 avenue de l'Europe T´el´ecopie : (+33) 4 76 61 20 99 Montbonnot Saint Martin Adresse ´electronique : mailto:[email protected] 38334 St Ismier Cedex France Arnaud Legrand, CNRS researcher INRIA MESCAL project, LIG Laboratory Proposal for a M2R internship Fair Response Time Optimization of Multi-User BOINC Projects Advisors: Arnaud Legrand Required Skills: • C programming, UNIX, shell, ssh, git • Basics of experiment analysis/workload characterization with R and fundamentals of scheduling are a plus 1 Context Recent evolutions in inter-networking technology and the decreasing cost-performance ratio of computing components have enabled Volunteer Computing (VC) systems. Among these platforms, BOINC (Berkley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing)[And04] is the most representative, with over 580,000 hosts that deliver over 2,300 TeraFLOP per day and many projects deployed. In such platforms, volunteers usually donate their machines' CPU idle time to scientific projects and indicate some preferences on how to share their processing power among them. BOINC projects usually have hundreds of thousands of independent CPU- bound tasks and are interested in overall throughput, i.e., maximize the total number of tasks completed per day. Each project has its own server which is responsible for distributing work units to clients, recovering results and validating them. To handle this complexity, BOINC implements a simple and robust distributed protocol which ensures that local shares and volunteer priorities are respected.
    [Show full text]