Heatwaves Diminish the Survival of a Subtidal Gastropod Through
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Limited Effects of Grazer Exclusion on the Epiphytes of Posidonia Sinuosa
Aquatic Botany 78 (2004) 3–14 Limited effects of grazer exclusion on the epiphytes of Posidonia sinuosa in South Australia Dominic Keuskamp∗ School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University of South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia Received 8 August 2002; received in revised form 10 July 2003; accepted 22 August 2003 Abstract The role of grazing in regulating the abundance and biomass of epiphytes of the seagrass Posidonia sinuosa Cambridge et Kuo was investigated at an oligotrophic site in lower Spencer Gulf, South Australia. Prosobranch gastropods >7 mm in size were excluded from 0.25 m2 plots of seagrass for 3 months with four steel mesh cages, compared with four partial cages used to control for cage artefacts, and also four uncaged control plots. Abundances of epiphytic algae, invertebrates and epiphytic mass (DW, AFDW and calcium carbonate) were recorded regularly. The indirect effect of grazer exclusion on seagrass leaf mortality (necrosis) was also measured. Grazing effects on the epiphytic assemblage were detected despite some cage artefacts. Filamentous algal abundance and epiphytic biomass (AFDW) increased in response to grazer exclusion. Caging per se reduced crustose coralline algal cover and calcium carbonate during the experimental period but, after 3 months, no artefact or treatment effect was discernible. Abundances of invertebrate taxa were little affected by grazer exclusion although caging per se reduced the density of spirorbid polychaetes. Grazer exclusion did not affect seagrass necrosis. In comparison with similar studies and given the duration of exclusion, the sum of treatment effects on epiphytes and seagrass was small. Rather, the role of epiphyte grazing in this nutrient-poor area appears to be limited to the maintenance of an epiphytic assemblage that is free of filamentous algae and dominated by crustose corallines. -
A Somogy Megyei Múzeum Puhatestű (Mollusca) Gyűjteményének Gyarapodása I
Natura Somogyiensis 9 79-129 Kaposvár, 2006 A Somogy Megyei Múzeum puhatestű (Mollusca) gyűjteményének gyarapodása I. HÉRA ZOLTÁN H-7400 Kaposvár Tamási Áron utca 9, Hungary, e-mail:[email protected] HÉRA Z.: Enrichment of the malacological (Mollusca) collection in Somogy County Museum I. Abstract: A small but old collection of mollusc from Dr. Wiesinger's legacy got to the collection of the Natural History Department of Somogy County Museum. Altogether 2600 items, 18000 specimens can be found in the revised collection, the bigger part of the collection (Tolnai's coll.) date from the first part of 20th century. Now the author published the date of Tolnai's collection in this paper. There are collection materials not only from Dr. Tolnai but also his famous contemporary malacologists: Streda R., H. Barthelmes, Geyer, Hässlein, W. Klemm, Schlickum, W. R., Jaeckel, S., Modell, H. Waldén, H. W. Keywords: Mollusca, malacological history, malacological collection, Hungary Bevezetés 2004. évben a Somogy Megyei Múzeumok Igazgatósága Természettudományi Osztá- lya különleges puhatestű gyűjteménnyel gyarapodott. Előző birtokosa Juhász György az újpesti Lepkemúzeum tulajdonosa volt, aki gazdag lepkegyűjteményén kívül sok egyéb mellett látványos és értékes puhatestű ritkaságot is bemutat a látogatóknak. Az örökö- söktől még ajándékozással továbbkerülő kollekció többször gazdát cserélt, mígnem vá- sárlás révén a Lepkemúzeumba kerülhetett. Juhász György Dr. Mészáros Zoltán profesz- szor úr közbenjárására, akinek szívességéből az SMMI Természettudományi Osztályá- nak gyűjteménye már eddig is számos különleges rovarcsoporttal és csigaanyaggal gya- rapodott, a kollekció nagyobbik hányadát a múzeum gyűjteményének (Kaposvár) aján- dékozta, azzal a kéréssel, hogy az anyag egy részét a feldolgozás és határozás után a Lepkemúzeumban helyezzük el. -
(Approx) Mixed Micro Shells (22G Bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22G Bag Provides Hours of Fun; Some Interesting Foraminifera Also Included
Special Price £ US$ Family Genus, species Country Quality Size Remarks w/o Photo Date added Category characteristic (€) (approx) (approx) Mixed micro shells (22g bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22g bag provides hours of fun; some interesting Foraminifera also included. 17/06/21 Mixed micro shells Ischnochitonidae Callistochiton pulchrior Panama F+++ 89mm € 1,80 £1,55 $2,10 21/12/16 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Chaetopleura lurida Panama F+++ 2022mm € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 Hairy girdles, beautifully preserved. Web 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Ischnochiton textilis South Africa F+++ 30mm+ € 4,00 £3,45 $4,68 30/04/21 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Ischnochiton textilis South Africa F+++ 27.9mm € 2,80 £2,42 $3,27 30/04/21 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Stenoplax limaciformis Panama F+++ 16mm+ € 6,50 £5,61 $7,60 Uncommon. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura gemmata Philippines F+++ 25mm+ € 2,50 £2,16 $2,92 Hairy margins, beautifully preserved. 04/08/17 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura gemmata Australia F+++ 25mm+ € 2,60 £2,25 $3,04 02/06/18 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura granulata Panama F+++ 41mm+ € 4,00 £3,45 $4,68 West Indian 'fuzzy' chiton. Web 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura granulata Panama F+++ 32mm+ € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 West Indian 'fuzzy' chiton. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F+++ 44mm+ € 5,00 £4,32 $5,85 Caribbean. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F++ 35mm € 2,50 £2,16 $2,92 Caribbean. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F+++ 29mm+ € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 Caribbean. -
Download Full Article 2.0MB .Pdf File
Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria 12 April 1971 Port Phillip Bay Survey 2 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1971.32.08 8 INTERTIDAL ECOLOGY OF PORT PHILLIP BAY WITH SYSTEMATIC LIST OF PLANTS AND ANIMALS By R. J. KING,* J. HOPE BLACKt and SOPHIE c. DUCKER* Abstract The zonation is recorded at 14 stations within Port Phillip Bay. Any special features of a station arc di�cusscd in �elation to the adjacent stations and the whole Bay. The intertidal plants and ammals are listed systematically with references, distribution within the Bay and relevant comment. 1. INTERTIDAL ECOLOGY South-western Bay-Areas 42, 49, 50 By R. J. KING and J. HOPE BLACK Arca 42: Station 21 St. Leonards 16 Oct. 69 Introduction Arca 49: Station 4 Swan Bay Jetty, 17 Sept. 69 This account is basically coneerncd with the distribution of intertidal plants and animals of Eastern Bay-Areas 23-24, 35-36, 47-48, 55 Port Phillip Bay. The benthic flora and fauna Arca 23, Station 20, Ricketts Pt., 30 Sept. 69 have been dealt with in separate papers (Mem Area 55: Station 15 Schnapper Pt. 25 May oir 27 and present volume). 70 Following preliminary investigations, 14 Area 55: Station 13 Fossil Beach 25 May stations were selected for detailed study in such 70 a way that all regions and all major geological formations were represented. These localities Southern Bay-Areas 60-64, 67-70 are listed below and are shown in Figure 1. Arca 63: Station 24 Martha Pt. 25 May 70 For ease of comparison with Womersley Port Phillip Heads-Areas 58-59 (1966), in his paper on the subtidal algae, the Area 58: Station 10 Quecnscliff, 12 Mar. -
Download (862Kb)
59 ON SOME TASMANIAN TBOCHIDjE. By the Eev. J. E. Tenison-Woods, F.a.S., F.L.S., Corr. Mem. Eoy. Soc. Tas., KS.W., Yict., and N. Z. Inste. [Bead 12th August, 1879.] In tlie Proceedings for 1877 this Society did me the honor to publish in its pages a Census of the Marine Shells of the Tasmanian coasts. In that list I discussed some of the claims of certain species, but a great many questions con- nected with the classification I was obliged to leave untouched. I now propose to deal with the names of some of the Trocliidce, and the validity of certain genera as regards those Tasmanian species which are included in them. It will be observed that in many cases I have remarked in the Census that I did not consider certain genera as very reliable. I do not know any family to which this is so applicable as to the TrochidcB, and for the present I shall confine my remarks to them. The family of Trochidce, as defined by Messrs. H. and A. Adams, and whose divisions I shall follow, is meant to include animals with an elongate tongue, median teeth broad, laterals five, denticulated ; uncini very numerous, slender with hooked points ; head proboscidiform ; tentacles subulate, somewhat ciHated ; eyes on free peduncles on their outer base, two more or less developed head-lobes between the tentacles, gill single, long, linear. Sides of the foot with a large neck-lappet near the eye peduncle, continuous with a conspicuous side membrane bearing on its free margin, from three to five tapering filaments. -
Ecklonia Radiata) by Seagrass- Associated Mesograzers in Temperate South-Western Australia
Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses : Honours Theses 2007 The use of detached kelp (Ecklonia radiata) by seagrass- associated mesograzers in temperate South-Western Australia Christopher Doropoulos Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Doropoulos, C. (2007). The use of detached kelp (Ecklonia radiata) by seagrass-associated mesograzers in temperate South-Western Australia. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/1076 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/1076 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. Where the reproduction of such material is done without attribution of authorship, with false attribution of authorship or the authorship is treated in a derogatory manner, this may be a breach of the author’s moral rights contained in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Courts have the power to impose a wide range of civil and criminal sanctions for infringement of copyright, infringement of moral rights and other offences under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. -
Living Costs of Ocean Acidification and Warming in Herbivorous Gastropods
LIVING COSTS OF OCEAN ACIDIFICATION AND WARMING IN HERBIVOROUS GASTROPODS AND THEIR ADAPTATIONS JONATHAN YU SING LEUNG Presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences The University of Adelaide February 2018 Cover image: Nerita atramentosa (black) and Austrocochlea concamerata (black with white stripes). Photo credit: Jonathan Yu Sing Leung II DECLARATION I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name, in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission in my name for any other degree or diploma in any university or tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint award of this degree. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The author acknowledges that copyright of published works contained within this thesis resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University’s digital research repository, the Library Search and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time. -
Vetigastropoda, Neritimorpha Y Conoidea)
Mitogenómica y filogenia de linajes de gasterópodos altamente diversificados (Vetigastropoda, Neritimorpha y Conoidea) Juan Esteban Uribe Arboleda 2016 MITOGENÓMICA Y FILOGENIA DE LINAJES DE GASTERÓPODOS ALTAMENTE DIVERSIFICADOS (VETIGASTROPODA, NERITIMORPHA Y CONOIDEA) Juan Esteban Uribe Arboleda Tesis doctoral 2016 Mitogenómica y filogenia de linajes de gasterópodos altamente diversificados (Vetigastropoda, Neritimorpha y Conoidea) PROGRAMA DE DOCTORADO EN BIOLOGÍA Y CIENCIAS DE LA ALIMENTACIÓN MEMORIA PRESENTADA POR JUAN ESTEBAN URIBE ARBOLEDA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTOR POR LA UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID DIRECTORES: RAFAEL ZARDOYA SAN SEBASTIÁN JOSÉ TEMPLADO GONZÁLEZ TUTOR: ÁNGEL ANTONIO LUQUE DEL VILLAR ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Para mi madre y mis abuelos ! 3! AGRADECIMIENTOS Muchas personas e instituciones han contribuido a esta tesis doctoral, en un sentido u otro, y quiero en estas líneas agradecerles: Inicialmente agradezco a mis directores de tesis, que además de grandes personas son excelentes profesionales con un gran don para enseñar. Gracias de verdad, esto ha sido un experiencia enriquecedora, que seguro, recordaré toda mi vida. A mi tutor de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Ángel Luque, que siempre estuvo dispuesto a ayudarme y a corregirme. Al Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales de Madrid, por facilitar todo para que nosotros los becarios hagamos lo que hacemos. Incluyendo a todo el personal humano: investigadores, directivos, técnicos, servicios generales, a todos, gracias. Al Ministerio de España por la financiación de esta tesis doctoral a partir de los proyectos (CGL2010-18216;! CGL2013- 45211-C2-2-P) y la beca FPI (BES-2011-051469). Como también, al Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle de París, institución que me ha recibido en tres ocasiones para hacer mis estancias de investigación que tanto han enriquecido mi formación. -
Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania
26 CENSUS ; WITH BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS OF THE. MARINE SHELLS OF TASMANIA AND THE ADJACENT ISLANDS. By THE Rev. J. E. Tenison-Woods, F.L.S., F.G.S., F.R.G.S., CoK. Mem. of Roy. Soc. ofN.S.W., Tas., Victoria, Etc. [Bead Idth March, 1877.] Note.—All the measurements are given in French millimetres, and the greatest measurement in each direction is always meant. The letters N., S., E., and W. will be \;sed to denote, the north, south, east, and west coasts of the island respectively ; B. St., Bass' Straits ; S.E.A., South-east Australia, as far as Port Jackson inclusive ; E.A., the whole of the East Australian coast ; S.A., the whole of the South Australian coast as far as Spencer's Gulf ; W.A., Western Australia, as far as Swan River ; V. will mean Victoria from Cape Howe to Portland Bay. Class Cephalapoda. Argonauta oryzata. Meush. Miis. Gev. 252, 133. This well-known shell, the " Paper Nautilus " of collectors is rarely found in Tasmania. Two species are found in E.A., not uncommon in S.A. Spirula l^vis. Graij, Cat. Moll. Brit. Mus. Pt. 1, it. 116. S.A., E.A., and W.A., rather uncommon. Sepia. Two species at least, not determined, and others of Octopus, Cistopus, Onychoteuthis, etc. Class Gasteropoda. MuREx TRiFORMis. Reeve, Icon. 2^1. '^^,Ji!J- 53. Somewhat common but generally worn and imperfect specimens only. The shell seems as if its growth were stunted by its southern habitat, while in South AustraKa the varices expand into beautiful and delicate frills. -
Information Product 3
CHAPTER 5 HABITATS AS SURROGATES FOR FAUNAL AND FLORAL ASSEMBLAGES ASSOCIATED WITH ROCKY REEFS ALONG THE VICTORIAN COAST Tim O’Hara Habitats as Surrogates for Faunal and Floral Assemblages Chapter 5 CHAPTER 5 HABITATS AS SURROGATES FOR FAUNAL AND FLORAL ASSEMBLAGES ASSOCIATED WITH ROCKY REEFS ALONG THE VICTORIAN COAST 5.1 Introduction This chapter investigates if ‘habitat’ categories based on dominant vegetation types are effective surrogates for determining presence/absence of associated species. In this way the benefit of using dominant vegetation types as attributes for habitat mapping can be assessed as a useful method for representing marine biodiversity. The study targets smaller sessile and slow moving benthic fauna and flora (excluding fish) that use the canopies and holdfasts of larger dominant vegetation for primary shelter. The study also examines association patterns at various taxonomic scales in relation to different geographic locations and environmental variables. 5.1.1 Habitats as Biodiversity Surrogates The terms ‘habitats’, ‘communities’ and ‘assemblages’ have been used for over a century in the marine environment as a way of understanding and describing spatial patterns of flora and fauna (Erwin 1983). The concept of describing communities began with the recognition that there appeared to be regularly occurring suites of marine animals that exist together (Petersen 1911). Jones (1950) suggested that environmental factors might determine which suite of animals was present. For this chapter the term ‘assemblage’ is used as a synonymous term for ‘community’ that describe suites of species existing together, while the term ‘habitat’ refers to dominant flora and physical variables that provide suitable refuge and niches for other species. -
Marine Invertebrates of the Northern and Yorke Nrm Region: Results of 2013-2014 Field Work, Including Records of New Species
MARINE INVERTEBRATES OF THE NORTHERN AND YORKE NRM REGION: RESULTS OF 2013-2014 FIELD WORK, INCLUDING RECORDS OF NEW SPECIES J. Baker1, A. Falconer2, D. Kinasz3, A. Futterer4, H. Crawford5, K. Puxley6, J. Baker-Johnson7, S. Ruxton8, A. Newton9, K. Hart10, B. Moffat11, A. Strous12, M. Sutcliffe13, W. Butvila14, J. Santiago15, L. Baade16 and D. Aston17 1 Janine L. Baker, Marine Ecologist, Founder and Manager of South Australian Conservation Research Divers (SACReD) Email: [email protected] 2 A. Falconer, Marine Research Group of the Fields Naturalists Club of Victoria, associate of SACReD, and associate of Museum Victoria 3 D. Kinasz, Marine Photographer, fieldwork assistant, member of Adelaide University SCUBA Club, associate of SACReD 4 A. Futterer, Marine Photographer, member of Adelaide University SCUBA Club and M.E. Dive Club, member of SACReD 5 H. Crawford, Marine Photographer, member of SACReD, member of MLSSA 6 K. Puxley, Marine Photographer, member of M.E. Dive Club, associate of SACReD 7 J. Baker-Johnson, SCUBA diver and fieldwork assistant; member of SACReD 8 S. Ruxton, Marine Photographer, associate of SACReD 9 A. Newton, Marine Photographer and Videographer at A&K Diving; associate of SACReD 10 K. Hart, Marine Photographer and Videographer at A&K Diving, associate of SACReD 11 B. Moffat, Marine Photographer, member of Wallaroo and Districts Dive Club 12 A. Strous, Marine Photographer, Marine Biology student and member of Adelaide University SCUBA Club 13 M. Sutcliffe, Marine Photographer, member of Adelaide University SCUBA Club 14 W. Butvila, Marine Photographer; Founder and Manager of M.E. Dive Club 15 J. Santiago, Marine Photographer 16 L. -
Infaunal Monitoring 2009
Winter Report Infaunal Monitoring 2009 Ana Glavinic [This document contains the report for the winter season of the Kira Beattie Adelaide Desalination Plant Infaunal Monitoring Program undertaken by Flinders University.] Kirsten Benkendorff Sabine Dittmann Infaunal Monitoring Preliminary Report 2009 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 5 Sampling sites ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Site description ................................................................................................................................... 5 Suction Sampling ................................................................................................................................. 7 Dredge Sampling ................................................................................................................................. 7 Sorting and Identification ................................................................................................................... 7 Data Analyses ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Results ........................................................................................................................................