DOCSLIB.ORG

Recovery Plan for Twelve Threatened Orchids in the Lofty Block Region of South Australia 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2010 Citation Quarmby, J. P. (2010) Recovery Plan for Twelve Threatened Orchids in the Lofty Block Region of South Australia 2010. Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia. This recovery plan was prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Note: This recovery plan sets out the actions necessary to stop the decline of, and support the recovery of, the listed threatened species or ecological community. The Australian Government is committed to acting in accor- dance with the plan and to implementing the plan as it applies to Common- wealth areas. The plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a broad range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. © Department for Environment and Heritage ISBN 1 921238 80 1 FIS 90534 Department for Environment and Heritage Cover photographs: Top left: Caladenia macroclavia (J. Quarmby); top cen- Adelaide and Mount Lofty Natural tre: volunteers caging (D. Bickerton); top right: volunteers weeding (P. Clark); Resource Management Board bottom left: Pterostylis sp. ‘Halbury’ (J.Quarmby); bottom right: Caladenia Northern and Yorke Natural Resource woolcockiorum (J. Quarmby). Management Board Acknowledgements Firstly the author would like to thank the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resource Management Board, Northern and Yorke Natural Resource Management Board, and the South Australian Government Department for Environment and Heritage for funding the Lofty Block Threatened Orchid Recovery Project. Thanks also to the numerous community groups that have volunteered their time, skills and expertise to the project, particularly members of the Threatened Plant Action Group, Native Orchid Society of South Australia, Friends of Parks groups, and Trees for Life. The contribution of all members of the Lofty Block Threatened Orchid Recovery Teams to the preparation of this recovery plan is gratefully acknowledged, including: Andrew Allanson, Rob Bates, Stuart Beinke, Doug Bickerton, Heather Bryant, Pat Clark, Peter Clark, Peter Copley, Jackie Crampton, Erik Dahl, Leah Egan, Ian Falkenberg, Guy Fishlock-Smith, Kate Greenhill, Tom Hands, Cathy Houston, Malcolm Houston, Amelia Hurren, Tim Jury, Janine Kraehenbuehl, Graham Lawrie, Peter McCauley, Phil McNamara, Rosemary Pedler, Jen Pitman, Andy Sharp, Jenny Skinner, Wendy Stubbs, Steve Taylor, Thai Te, Jean Turner and Andrew West. Special thanks to Roman Urban for providing GIS support, including the preparation of all maps. Finally the author would like to sincerely thank all of the other people that have contributed to this recovery plan or have been involved in the Lofty Block Threatened Orchid Recovery Project over the years. Photographic Credits Thanks to Doug Bickerton and Pat Clark for the use of their photographs of volunteers on the cover, and to Rob Bates for his photograph of Caladenia xantholeuca on page 87. All other photographs were taken by the author. Thanks also to Gilbert Dashorst (State Herbarium of South Australia) for his line drawing of Caladenia argocalla (pp. 1, 29, 121 and 141). i ii Executive Summary This plan provides the framework for the recovery of twelve nationally threatened orchid species that occur in the Lofty Block region of South Australia (refer to Table A). It was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The plan is intended to guide the implementation of recovery actions. Table A: Summary information for twelve threatened orchid species in the Lofty Block region. Species EPBC Act Listing Est. Population Size No. of sub-populations Extent of Occurrence (km²) Key Threats Caladenia argocalla Endangered 1800 13 1666 Weed invasion, herbivory, lack of pollination and recruitment, road (White Beauty Spider-orchid) and track management Caladenia behrii Endangered 3440 32 598 Herbivory, weed invasion, lack of recruitment (Pink-lipped Spider-orchid) Caladenia gladiolata Endangered 780 4 317 Weed invasion, herbivory, lack of pollination (Bayonet Spider-orchid) Caladenia intuta Critically 400 2 2.7 Weed invasion, grazing, vegetation Endangered clearance, trampling (Ghost Spider-orchid) Caladenia macroclavia Endangered 35 5 382 Herbivory, weed invasion, grazing, lack of pollination (Large-club Spider-orchid) Caladenia rigida Endangered 5500 24 458 Herbivory, weed invasion, lack of recruitment (White Spider-orchid) Caladenia woolcockiorum Vulnerable 5400 9 13 Weed invasion, herbivory, track management (Woolcock’s Spider-orchid) Caladenia xantholeuca Endangered Possibly - - Lack of recruitment, weed invasion extinct (Flinders Ranges Spider-orchid) Pterostylis bryophila Critically 1140 3 72 Weed invasion, herbivory, fire, Endangered trampling (Hindmarsh Valley Greenhood) Pterostylis cucullata Vulnerable 6380 5 366 Weed invasion, herbivory, fire, recreation (Leafy Greenhood) Pterostylis despectans Endangered 600 4 79 Lack of pollination, grazing, weed invasion (Lowly Greenhood) Pterostylis sp. Halbury Endangered 9000 2 17 Weed invasion, herbivory, trampling (Halbury Greenhood) Note: The population and extent of occurrence data is based on 2006 figures. Conservation Status All twelve species in this recovery plan are listed as nationally threatened under the EPBC Act, and as threatened in South Australia under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 (refer to Table A). The conservation status of each species has also been reviewed using IUCN Red List Criteria Version 3.1 (IUCN 2001) as part of this planning process (refer to Table 1). General species information All of the species in this recovery plan have restricted and fragmented distributions (refer to Table A). Many of the species also have small population sizes and/or a limited number of sub-populations. Detailed information on the current distribution, population size, habitat, and ecology of each of the species is provided in Part B of this plan. iii All of the species in this plan are at risk from numerous threats including climate change, vegetation clearance, weed invasion, herbivory, lack of pollination and recruitment, and road and track management activities (refer to Table A). The current threats to each species are also described in detail in Part B. Recovery objectives and performance criteria The overall recovery objective for each species in this recovery plan is to improve the conservation status within a specified timeframe, e.g. from Endangered to Vulnerable within 30 years (refer to Part B). The following recovery objectives have been developed for the species in this plan: 1. To increase the known extent of occurrence of the species. 2. To increase the number of known sub-populations. 3. To maintain or increase the size of each sub-population. 4. To maintain or increase the area of occupancy of the species. 5. To maintain or improve quality of habitat critical to survival. 6. To safeguard against the risk of sub-population extinctions. 7. To increase the knowledge of the biology and ecology of the species. 8. To maintain or increase the level of community participation in the recovery process. Each recovery objective is supported by performance criteria, which provide targets for measuring the achievement of recovery objectives (refer to Table 6). Specific recovery objectives and performance criteria for each species are listed in Part B of this plan. Recovery strategies and actions The following recovery strategies have been developed for the species in this plan: A. Determine population size and trends. B. Determine current extent of occurrence and number of sub-populations. C. Mitigate the threats to sub-populations. D. Protect and manage habitat critical to survival. E. Preserve germplasm and mycorrhizal fungi in vitro. F. Determine the feasibility of translocation and implement translocation proposals. G. Undertake research related to the species. H. Inform, encourage and support landholders and the community. Each recovery strategy is supported by a number of recovery actions (refer to Table 7), which are justified and described in Section 3.3. Specific recovery actions for each species are listed in Part B of this plan, with associated timelines and delivery groups. Each recovery action may contribute to achieving more than one recovery objective and performance criterion. The relationship between recovery objectives, performance criteria and recovery actions is shown in Appendix E. Costs and evaluation The resources required to implement this plan are estimated to be $968800, with an average cost of $138400 per year. The budget for the plan is outlined in Part C. Funding will be sought from Natural Resource Management Boards, the South Australian Department for Environment and Heritage, Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, community grants, and other available sources. Annual progress towards achieving the specific recovery objectives for each species in this recovery plan will be reported by the Lofty Block Threatened Orchid Recovery Teams. A major independent review of the recovery process will occur after the plan has been in operation for five years.
Recommended publications
  • North Central Native Vegetation Plan

    North Central Native Vegetation Plan

    © North Central Catchment Management Authority 2005 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the North Central Catchment Management Authority. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Community Engagement, North Central Catchment Management Authority, PO Box 18, Huntly Vic 3551. Telephone: 03 5448 7124 ISBN 0 9578204 0 2 Front cover images: David Kleinert, North Central Catchment Management Authority Back cover images: Adrian Martins, Paul Haw, David Kleinert All other images: North Central Catchment Management Authority North Central Catchment Management Authority PO Box 18 Huntly Vic 3551 Telephone: 03 5448 7124 Facsimile: 03 5448 7148 www.nccma.vic.gov.au Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the North Central Catchment Management Authority (CMA) and its employees do not guarantee that the information contained in this publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes. The North Central Catchment Management Authority therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on the contents of this publication. The North Central CMA Native Vegetation Plan is Ministerially endorsed. The plan outlines the framework for native vegetation management in the North Central region, describes the strategic direction for native vegetation and includes the regional approach to Net Gain. ii Acknowledgements The completion of the North Central Native Vegetation Plan has been assisted by funding from the Catchment and Water Division of DSE (formerly NRE) and Environment Australia through the Natural Heritage Trust (Bushcare).
  • National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972.PDF

    National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972.PDF

    Version: 1.7.2015 South Australia National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 An Act to provide for the establishment and management of reserves for public benefit and enjoyment; to provide for the conservation of wildlife in a natural environment; and for other purposes. Contents Part 1—Preliminary 1 Short title 5 Interpretation Part 2—Administration Division 1—General administrative powers 6 Constitution of Minister as a corporation sole 9 Power of acquisition 10 Research and investigations 11 Wildlife Conservation Fund 12 Delegation 13 Information to be included in annual report 14 Minister not to administer this Act Division 2—The Parks and Wilderness Council 15 Establishment and membership of Council 16 Terms and conditions of membership 17 Remuneration 18 Vacancies or defects in appointment of members 19 Direction and control of Minister 19A Proceedings of Council 19B Conflict of interest under Public Sector (Honesty and Accountability) Act 19C Functions of Council 19D Annual report Division 3—Appointment and powers of wardens 20 Appointment of wardens 21 Assistance to warden 22 Powers of wardens 23 Forfeiture 24 Hindering of wardens etc 24A Offences by wardens etc 25 Power of arrest 26 False representation [3.7.2015] This version is not published under the Legislation Revision and Publication Act 2002 1 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972—1.7.2015 Contents Part 3—Reserves and sanctuaries Division 1—National parks 27 Constitution of national parks by statute 28 Constitution of national parks by proclamation 28A Certain co-managed national
  • Intro Outline

    Intro Outline

    THE REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY OF TWO TERRESTRIAL ORCHIDS, CALADENIA RIGIDA AND CALADENIA TENTACULATA RENATE FAAST Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Adelaide, South Australia December, 2009 i . DEcLARATION This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution to Renate Faast and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The author acknowledges that copyright of published works contained within this thesis (as listed below) resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University's digital research repository, the Library catalogue, the Australasian Digital Theses Program (ADTP) and also through web search engines. Published works contained within this thesis: Faast R, Farrington L, Facelli JM, Austin AD (2009) Bees and white spiders: unravelling the pollination' syndrome of C aladenia ri gída (Orchidaceae). Australian Joumal of Botany 57:315-325. Faast R, Facelli JM (2009) Grazrngorchids: impact of florivory on two species of Calademz (Orchidaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 57:361-372. Farrington L, Macgillivray P, Faast R, Austin AD (2009) Evaluating molecular tools for Calad,enia (Orchidaceae) species identification.
  • Major Threats to Endangered Orchids of Victoria, Australia

    Major Threats to Endangered Orchids of Victoria, Australia

    Selbyana 26(1,2): 189-195. 2005. MAJOR THREATS TO ENDANGERED ORCHIDS OF VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA MICHAEL DUNCAN* Flora Ecology Research, Arthur Rylah Institute, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia 3084. Email: [email protected] ANDREW PRITCHARD Department of Sustainability and Environment, 78 Henna Street, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia 3280. FIONA COATES Flora Ecology Research, Arthur Rylah Institute, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia 3084. ABSTRACT. Endangered terrestrial orchids in the public network of parks and reserves, on private land, along roadsides, and in small vegetation remnants in Victoria, Australia, face a range of threats. These include weed invasion, grazing by invertebrates and native and introduced herbivores, road maintenance, and small population size resulting from habitat fragmentation. In addition, these areas have been affected often and adversely by altered fire regimes or hydrology, introduced pathogens, mini ng and forestry activ­ ities, recreational activities, and site disturbance. Many species are under threat of illicit collection, and many suffer from inadequate public understanding of basic orchid biology, of conditions required for seedling recruitment, and of the need to maintain specific pollinators and mycorrhizal fungi. Key words: Orchidaceae, threats, endangered, Victoria, conservation INTRODUCTION facing terrestrial orchids in Victoria include land clearing, habitat fragmentation and small popu­ The state of Victoria, in the southeast corner lation size, weed invasion, grazing by inverte­ of Australia, contains a diverse orchid flora with brates and native and introduced herbivores, site more than 370 taxa recognized. Orchids are disturbance, mining, forestry, recreational activ­ among Victoria's natural treasures and must be ities, altered fire regimes or hydrology, and in­ counted among its most threatened assets (Back­ troduced pathogens, These threats are com­ house & Jeanes 1995).
  • Intro Outline

    Intro Outline

    THE REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY OF TWO TERRESTRIAL ORCHIDS, CALADENIA RIGIDA AND CALADENIA TENTACULATA RENATE FAAST Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Adelaide, South Australia December, 2009 . DEcLARATION This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution to Renate Faast and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The author acknowledges that copyright of published works contained within this thesis (as listed below) resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University's digital research repository, the Library catalogue, the Australasian Digital Theses Program (ADTP) and also through web search engines. Published works contained within this thesis: Faast R, Farrington L, Facelli JM, Austin AD (2009) Bees and white spiders: unravelling the pollination' syndrome of C aladenia ri gída (Orchidaceae). Australian Joumal of Botany 57:315-325. Faast R, Facelli JM (2009) Grazrngorchids: impact of florivory on two species of Calademz (Orchidaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 57:361-372. Farrington L, Macgillivray P, Faast R, Austin AD (2009) Evaluating molecular tools for Calad,enia (Orchidaceae) species identification.
  • Conservation Advice Pterostylis Despectans Lowly Greenhood

    Conservation Advice Pterostylis Despectans Lowly Greenhood

    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister’s delegate approved this Conservation Advice on 16/12/2016 . Conservation Advice Pterostylis despectans lowly greenhood Conservation Status Pterostylis despectans (lowly greenhood) is listed as Endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act). The species is eligible for listing as prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as Endangered under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). Species can also be listed as threatened under state and territory legislation. For information on the listing status of this species under relevant state or territory legislation, see http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl The main factors that are the cause of the species being eligible for listing in the Endangered category are its restricted and fragmented distribution; and its declining population due to continuing threats. Description The lowly greenhood (Orchidaceae) is a herbaceous perennial geophyte that remains dormant underground as a tuber from late summer into early winter. In late winter (May to June) it develops a rosette of six to ten basal leaves and three or four stem-sheathing bract-like leaves above (DSE 2014; OEH 2014; Quarmby 2010). The rosette leaves are 10 - 20 mm long and 6 - 9 mm wide. The flower stem is produced between late October and December and the leaves shrivel up by the time the flowers mature. The flower stem is up to 80 mm tall, though often only reaching 20 - 30mm, with scaly bracts.
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project

    Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project

    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
  • Australian Natural History Australian Natural History Published Quarterly by the Australian Museum, 6-8 College Street, Sydney

    Australian Natural History Australian Natural History Published Quarterly by the Australian Museum, 6-8 College Street, Sydney

    AUSTRALIAN NATURAL HISTORY AUSTRALIAN NATURAL HISTORY PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM, 6-8 COLLEGE STREET, SYDNEY. TRUST PRESIDENT, JOE BAKER. MUSEUM DIRECTOR, DESMOND GRIFFIN VOLUM E 20 NUMBER 6 1981 This sun orchid, known as Thelymitra Altocumulus developed from a sheet of altostratus provided this memorable dawn near Mt Watt, truncata, is thought to be a natural hybrid Central Australia. Photo Robert Jones. between two commoner species, T. ixioides and T. pauciflora (or T. nuda). Obviously hybridisation is an uncommon or local phenomenon, or the parent species would lose their distinctness. Photo D. McAlpine. EDITOR CONTENTS Roland Hughes FROM THE INSIDE 173 ASSISTANT EDITOR Editorial Barbara Purse CIRCULATION PAGEANTRY IN THE SKIES 175 Bruce Colbey by Julian Hollis AMAZING ORCHIDS OF SOUTHERN AUSTRALIA 181 by David McAlpine Annual Subscription: Australia, $A8.00; New MAMMALS FOR ALL SEASONS 185 Zealand, $NZ11.50; other countries, $A9.50. by Roland Hughes Single copies: Australia, $A2.20, $A2.65 posted; New Zealand, $NZ3.00; other countries, $A3.40. COMMON BENT-WING BAT, Miniopterus schreibersii 187 For renewal or subscription please forward the Centrefold appropriate cheque/money order or bankcard number and authority made payable to Australian Natural History, the Australian Museum, PO Box A LOOK AT THE DINGO 191 A285, Sydney South 2001. by Bob Harden New Zealand subscribers should make cheque or money order payable to the New Zealand Govern­ DINOSAUR DIGGING IN VICTORIA 195 ment Printer, Private Bag, Wellington. by Timothy Flannery and Thomas Rich Subscribers from other countries please note that moneys must be paid in Australian currency. IN REVIEW 199 Opinions expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the policies or GOOD THINGS GROW IN GLASS 201 views of the Australian Museum.
  • Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids

    Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids

    SURVEY GUIDELINES FOR AUSTRALIA’S THREATENED ORCHIDS GUIDELINES FOR DETECTING ORCHIDS LISTED AS ‘THREATENED’ UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999 0 Authorship and acknowledgements A number of experts have shared their knowledge and experience for the purpose of preparing these guidelines, including Allanna Chant (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Allison Woolley (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment), Andrew Brown (Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation), Annabel Wheeler (Australian Biological Resources Study, Australian Department of the Environment), Anne Harris (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), David T. Liddle (Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, and Top End Native Plant Society), Doug Bickerton (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), John Briggs (New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage), Luke Johnston (Australian Capital Territory Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate), Sophie Petit (School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia), Melanie Smith (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Oisín Sweeney (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), Richard Schahinger (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment). Disclaimer The views and opinions contained in this document are not necessarily those of the Australian Government. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and while reasonable care has been taken in its compilation, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document.
  • JABG22P101 Barker

    JABG22P101 Barker

    JOURNAL of the ADELAIDE BOTANIC GARDENS AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL FOR AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY flora.sa.gov.au/jabg Published by the STATE HERBARIUM OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA on behalf of the BOARD OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS AND STATE HERBARIUM © Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Adelaide, South Australia © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia All rights reserved State Herbarium of South Australia PO Box 2732 Kent Town SA 5071 Australia © 2008 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 22 (2008) 101 –104 © 2008 Department for Environment & Heritage, Government of South Australia NOTES & SH ORT COMMUNICATIONS New combinations in Pterostylis and Caladenia and other name changes in the Orchidaceae of South Australia R.M. Barker & R.J. Bates State Herbarium of South Australia, Plant Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 2732, Kent Town, South Australia 5071 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Combinations are provided in Pterostylis and Caladenia (Orchidaceae) for new species initially described in the segregate genera Arachnorchis, Bunochilus and Oligochaetochilus. Recircumscription of existing species has led to some new species being recognised for South Australia and Prasophyllum sp. West Coast (R.Tate AD96945167) is now known as Prasophyllum catenemum D.L.Jones. Introduction within Pterostylis2 R.Br. will not be adopted. Both In the past, when there have been disagreements genera in the wider sense are recognised as monophyletic between botanists about the level at which species (Hopper & Brown 2004; Jones & Clements 2002b) should be recognised, the arguments have not impinged and for the practical purpose of running Australia’s particularly on the outside community.
  • Recovery Plan for Twelvve Threatened Spider-Orchid Caledenia R. Br. Taxa

    Recovery Plan for Twelvve Threatened Spider-Orchid Caledenia R. Br. Taxa

    RECOVERY PLAN for TWELVE THREATENED SPIDER-ORCHID CALADENIA R. Br. TAXA OF VICTORIA AND SOUTH AUSTRALIA 2000 - 2004 March 2000 Prepared by James A. Todd, Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria Flora and Fauna Statewide Programs Recovery Plan for twelve threatened Spider-orchid Caladenia taxa of Victoria and South Australia 2000-2004 – NRE, Victoria Copyright The Director, Environment Australia, GPO Box 636, Canberra, ACT 2601 2000. This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying or other, without the prior permission of the Director, Environment Australia. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this document are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Environment Australia, the Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria, the Department of Environment and Heritage, South Australia or Parks Victoria. Citation Todd, J.A. (2000). Recovery Plan for twelve threatened Spider-orchid Caladenia taxa (Orchidaceae: Caladeniinae) of Victoria and South Australia 2000 - 2004. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne. The Environment Australia Biodiversity Group, Threatened Species and Communities Section funded the preparation of this Plan. A Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity
  • Ecology of Pyrmont Peninsula 1788 - 2008

    Ecology of Pyrmont Peninsula 1788 - 2008

    Transformations: Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula 1788 - 2008 John Broadbent Transformations: Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula 1788 - 2008 John Broadbent Sydney, 2010. Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula iii Executive summary City Council’s ‘Sustainable Sydney 2030’ initiative ‘is a vision for the sustainable development of the City for the next 20 years and beyond’. It has a largely anthropocentric basis, that is ‘viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and values’(Macquarie Dictionary, 2005). The perspective taken here is that Council’s initiative, vital though it is, should be underpinned by an ecocentric ethic to succeed. This latter was defined by Aldo Leopold in 1949, 60 years ago, as ‘a philosophy that recognizes[sic] that the ecosphere, rather than any individual organism[notably humans] is the source and support of all life and as such advises a holistic and eco-centric approach to government, industry, and individual’(http://dictionary.babylon.com). Some relevant considerations are set out in Part 1: General Introduction. In this report, Pyrmont peninsula - that is the communities of Pyrmont and Ultimo – is considered as a microcosm of the City of Sydney, indeed of urban areas globally. An extensive series of early views of the peninsula are presented to help the reader better visualise this place as it was early in European settlement (Part 2: Early views of Pyrmont peninsula). The physical geography of Pyrmont peninsula has been transformed since European settlement, and Part 3: Physical geography of Pyrmont peninsula describes the geology, soils, topography, shoreline and drainage as they would most likely have appeared to the first Europeans to set foot there.