DOCSLIB.ORG

Host Range and Distribution of Predatory Stink Bug Andrallus Spinidens (F.) in Uttarakhand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Indian Journal of Entomology 83(2021) Online published Ref. No. e20163 DoI No.: 10.5958/0974-8172.2021.00011.0 HOST RANGE AND DISTRIBUTION OF PREDATORY STINK BUG ANDRALLUS SPINIDENS (F.) IN UTTARAKHAND BHOJENDRA*, RAVI PRAKASH MAURYA, LATIKA BRIJWAL, HIMANSHU PATWAL AND PARUL SUYAL Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar 263145, U.S. Nagar, Uttarakhand *Email: [email protected] (corresponding author) ABSTRACT This study is on the host range and geographical distribution of Andrallus spinidens (F.) in the agroecosystems of Kumaon region of Uttarakhand. Predatory bug was surveyed in selected locations from all six districts in Kumaon region of Uttarakhand from March 2018 to February 2019. The bug occurs invariably in all the locations on wheat, soybean, maize, pigeonpea, gram, rice, beans and cowpea crops and associated with lepidopteran pests. The preferred preys were found to be the instars larvae of Mythimna separata and Helicoverpa armigera in wheat, Spodoptera litura in soybean and cabbage, Cnaphalocrosis medinalis in rice, Maruca vitrata and H. armigera in pigeonpea, S. litura and M. vitrata in beans, H. armigera in okra and gram, and Chilo partellus on maize. Key words: Andrallus spinidens, predator, prey, host range and distribution, agroecosystems, wheat, rice, pigeonpea, gram, beans, cowpea, lepidopterans Uttarakhand in the north western Himalaya (28º43’- agents is relatively insignificant in IPM (Guillion, 31º 27’N, 77º34’- 81º02’E has 86% area is under 2008; Ehlers, 2010, 2011). Important natural enemies hills (210- 7817 masl), and has diverse agroclimatic of insect and mite pests include predators, parasites, conditions, cultivating agricultural and horticultural and pathogens (De Bach, 1964). Among these. crops, with 13% area under agriculture (Anonymous, predatory insects of various orders are used (Waage 2013). The major constraints are the insect pest and Greathead, 1988; Metcalf and Luckmann, 1994). problems. In India crop losses due to insect pests amount Order Hemiptera includes a diverse group of predaceous to 15.7% and annual loss of about US$ 36 billion species in subfamily Asopinae (367 species within (Dhaliwal et al., 2015). Major crops in Uttarakhand are 63 genera) under the family Pentatomidae (Thomas, rice, wheat, millets, soybean, pulses and vegetable crops 1992, 1994; Grazia et al., 2015) and have unique mode which are attacked by large number of lepidopteran of predation (Ho et al., 2003), but only little has been pests viz., Helicoverpa armigera, Mythimna separata, emphasized (De Clercq, 2008). The Asopinae bug Plutella xylostella, Pieris brassicae, Spodoptera Andrallus spinidens (F.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) litura and Trichoplusia orichalcea. These pests are is free living generalist predator associated with responsible for serious damage to the crops (Gupta, agricultural environment where it feeds on lepidopteran 2006; Sharma et al., 2013; Patel and Tiwari, 2016; Suyal larvae (Shylesha and Sravika, 2018). Much is known of et al., 2018). Pesticides are used to maintain the crop A. spinidens morphology (Ghate et al., 2012; Javadi et production, but these harm the sustainable agriculture al., 2006), biology (Singh and Singh, 1989; Lam, 2000), and environment (Martenies and Perry, 2013; Pimental reproduction on live and frozen prey (Mohaghegh and and Burgess, 2014; Bourguet and Guillemaud, 2016). Maafi, 2007), predatory behaviour (Khodaverdi et al., There is a need for devising ecofriendly ways, and one 2012; Uematsu, 2006), functional response (Shanker of these is biological control (Carson, 1962; Wilson et et al., 2017), bionomics (Rao and Rao, 1979), mass al., 1991). rearing (Ebadi and Ghaninia, 2003), seasonal occurrence and diapause (Shintani et al., 2010), enzymatic Planned introduction of the various natural activity (Zibaee et al., 2011), and also distribution and enemies of crop pests such as predators, parasitoids abundance in rice field (Claver and Jaiswal, 2013). This and microorganisms as biological control is a versatile bug is widely distributed (Distant, 1902; Thomas, 1992, alternative in IPM (Anonymous, 1995; Ehlers, 2011; 1994), and in Uttarakhand, it is known as predator of Altieri, 1995). The rate of faith on biological control Zygograma bicolorata (Pandey et al., 2002) and S. litura 2 Indian Journal of Entomology 83(2021) Online published Ref. No. e20163 infesting pulses (Maurya and Sharma, 2014). Details of has wide distribution- occurs in India, Malaya, China, its predation, host range, distribution from Uttarakhand Turkey, Greece, Africa, Syria, Madagascar, Australia, is lacking. The diversity of any population depends on North and Central America (Distant, 1908; Thomas, its phenotypic and environmental flexibility (Dingle and 1992, 1994), West Malaysia (Manley, 1982), Tropical Hegmann, 1982; Tauber et al., 1986). Environmental and warm temperate zone of Japan (Tomokuni et al., condition also having complex interaction with in insect 1993), Southern Japan (Uematsu, 2006), Northern Iran population and change in geographical condition will (Najafi-Navaee et al., 1998; Mohaghegh and Maafi, also affect their morphology, feeding, reproduction, 2007). In India it is reported in Assam, Sikkim, Ranchi, predatory efficiency mortality, fecundity, prey selection Khassi hills, West Bengal, Karnataka (Distant, 1902) and longevity of insect (Gatehouse, 1989; Dempster and and Himachal Pradesh (Pawar, 1976). McLean, 1999; Sokolowski, 2001). The present study is on the host range and distribution of A. spinidens at Andralla spinidens is a predator of many lepidopteran various locations in Kumaon region of Uttarakhand. larvae infesting Sesbania bispnidens (Cherian and Brahmachari, 1941); on Parnara mathias (Rao, 1965), MATERIALS AND METHODS H. armigera in lucerne and pigeon pea (Rajendra and Patel, 1971); Melanitis leda in rice (Manley, 1982); To study the distribution and host range of A. in soybean on Rivulia sp. (Singh and Singh, 1989); spinidens, several selected locations were visited and lepidopterans in rice (Najafi-Navaee et al., 1998; covering all six districts of Kumaon region of Mohaghegh and Maafi, 2007; Claver and Jaiswal, 2013) Uttarakhand, sufficiently away from each other and and on caterpillar of lepidopteron larvae (Uematsu, a representative of the major crop ecosystem of that 2006; Shintani et al., 2010). The present study provides location. Widespread surveys/ collection trips were done its host range and distribution in the Kumaon region. from March 2018 to February 2019, and observations on the prey and host plants were made (Oliver and ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Beattie, 1996). The authors acknowledge the Science and RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Engineering Research Board, New Delhi for financial assistance and Department of Entomology and The observations given in Table 1 reveal that during Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, G.B. Pant March locations in Udham Singh Nagar, Champawat University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar and Nanital district, the predator was found preying for providing facilities. on army worm (M. separata) in wheat and gram pod borer (H. armigera) in gram. Locations in Udham Singh REFERENCES Nagar, Nainital and Almora district surveyed during April sowed its occurrence on M. separata) in wheat, S. Altieri M A. 1995. Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. Boulder. West view Press. Part three: development, climate and litura in soybean and on C. partellus in maize. During rights 238: 12052-57. May, it was found preying on S. litura in soybean, okra Anonymous. 1995. Human Development Report 1995. NewYork/ and cabbage; and M. vitrata on gram. During June, it Oxford. was found on S. litura in beans and okra, M. vitrata in Anonymous. 2013. Uttarakhand at a glance. Directorate of economics cowpea and on H. armigera in okra. Surveys in July and statistics, Govt. of Uttarakhand. Dehradun. revealed it predation on H. armigera in pigeonpea; Bourguet D, Guillemaud T. 2016. The hidden and external costs of S. litura in urdbean and M. vitrata in mungbean. OIn pesticide use. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. Springer, Cham. 35-120 pp. August, it was seen in rice with C. medinalis, S. litura Carson, R. 1962. Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. in soybean, M. vitrata and H. armigera in pigeon Cherian M L, Brahmachari K. 1941. Notes on the three predators pea and bean; during September it was occurring Homoptera from South India. Indian Journal of Entomology 3: on C. medinalis in rice, S. litura in urd, moong and 110-119. soybean, M. vitrata in beans and on H. armigera in Claver M A, Jaiswal P. 2013. Distribution and abundance of two predatory pigeonpea. In October againt it was found preying stink bugs (Pentatomidae: Hemiptera) associated with rice field. on C. medinalis in rice, M. vitrata in pigeonpea, and Academic Journal of Entomology 6 (1): 33-36. S. litura in soybean; and in November, on S. litura in De Clercq P. 2008. Predatory stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae, Asopinae). Encyclopedia of insects - 2nd Edition. Dortrecht, Kluwer soybean, with occurrence becoming sparse, and absent Academic Publishers. pp. 3042-3045. in December- February. These observations revealed DeBach, P. 1964. Biological control of insect pests and weeds. New its wide distribution in Kumaon region. This predator York, Reihold. 266 pp. Host range and distribution of predatory stink bug Andrallus spinidens (F.) in Uttarakhand 3 Bhojendra et al. Table 1. Distribution and prey
Recommended publications
  • Arboreal Arthropod Assemblages in Chili Pepper with Different Mulches and Pest Managements in Freshwater Swamps of South Sumatra, Indonesia

    Arboreal Arthropod Assemblages in Chili Pepper with Different Mulches and Pest Managements in Freshwater Swamps of South Sumatra, Indonesia

    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 22, Number 6, June 2021 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 3065-3074 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d220608 Arboreal arthropod assemblages in chili pepper with different mulches and pest managements in freshwater swamps of South Sumatra, Indonesia SITI HERLINDA1,2,3,♥, TITI TRICAHYATI2, CHANDRA IRSAN1,2,3, TILI KARENINA4, HASBI3,5, SUPARMAN1, BENYAMIN LAKITAN3,6, ERISE ANGGRAINI1,3, ARSI1,3 1Department of Plant Pests and Diseases, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sriwijaya. Jl. Raya Palembang-Prabumulih Km 32, Indralaya, Ogan Ilir 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia. Tel.: +62-711-580663, Fax.: +62-711-580276, ♥email: [email protected] 2Crop Sciences Graduate Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sriwijaya. Jl. Padang Selasa No. 524, Bukit Besar, Palembang 30139, South Sumatra, Indonesia 3Research Center for Sub-optimal Lands, Universitas Sriwijaya. Jl. Padang Selasa No. 524, Bukit Besar, Palembang 30139, South Sumatra, Indonesia 4Research and Development Agency of South Sumatera Province. Jl. Demang Lebar Daun No. 4864, Pakjo, Palembang 30137, South Sumatra, Indonesia 5Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sriwijaya. Jl. Raya Palembang-Prabumulih Km 32, Indralaya, Ogan Ilir 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia 6Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sriwijaya. Jl. Raya Palembang-Prabumulih Km 32, Indralaya, Ogan Ilir 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia Manuscript received: 13 April 2021. Revision accepted: 7 May 2021. Abstract. Herlinda S, Tricahyati T, Irsan C, Karenina T, Hasbi, Suparman, Lakitan B, Anggraini E, Arsi. 2021. Arboreal arthropod assemblages in chili pepper with different mulches and pest managements in freshwater swamps of South Sumatra, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22: 3065-3074. In the center of freshwater swamps in South Sumatra, three different chili cultivation practices are generally found, namely differences in mulch and pest management that can affect arthropod assemblages.
  • Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest

    Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest

    INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS This page intentionally left blank INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS EDITED BY LAWRENCE I. GILBERT SARJEET S. GILL Amsterdam • Boston • Heidelberg • London • New York • Oxford Paris • San Diego • San Francisco • Singapore • Sydney • Tokyo Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BU, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA ª 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved The chapters first appeared in Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, edited by Lawrence I. Gilbert, Kostas Iatrou, and Sarjeet S. Gill (Elsevier, B.V. 2005). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (þ44) 1865 843830, fax (þ44) 1865 853333, e-mail [email protected]. Requests may also be completed on-line via the homepage (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Insect control : biological and synthetic agents / editors-in-chief: Lawrence I. Gilbert, Sarjeet S. Gill. – 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests–Control. 2. Insecticides. I. Gilbert, Lawrence I. (Lawrence Irwin), 1929- II. Gill, Sarjeet S. SB931.I42 2010 632’.7–dc22 2010010547 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 Cover Images: (Top Left) Important pest insect targeted by neonicotinoid insecticides: Sweet-potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci; (Top Right) Control (bottom) and tebufenozide intoxicated by ingestion (top) larvae of the white tussock moth, from Chapter 4; (Bottom) Mode of action of Cry1A toxins, from Addendum A7.
  • Florida Predatory Stink Bug (Unofficial Common Name), Euthyrhynchus Floridanus(Linnaeus) (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)1 Frank W

    Florida Predatory Stink Bug (Unofficial Common Name), Euthyrhynchus Floridanus(Linnaeus) (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)1 Frank W

    EENY157 Florida Predatory Stink Bug (unofficial common name), Euthyrhynchus floridanus (Linnaeus) (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)1 Frank W. Mead and David B. Richman2 Introduction Distribution The predatory stink bug, Euthyrhynchus floridanus (Lin- Euthyrhynchus floridanus is primarily a Neotropical species naeus) (Figure 1), is considered a beneficial insect because that ranges within the southeastern quarter of the United most of its prey consists of plant-damaging bugs, beetles, States. and caterpillars. It seldom plays a major role in the natural control of insects in Florida, but its prey includes a number Description of economically important species. Adults The length of males is approximately 12 mm, with a head width of 2.3 mm and a humeral width of 6.4 mm. The length of females is 12 to 17 mm, with a head width of 2.4 mm and a humeral width of 7.2 mm. Euthyrhynchus floridanus (Figure 2) normally can be distinguished from all other stink bugs in the southeastern United States by a red- dish spot at each corner of the scutellum outlined against a blue-black to purplish-brown ground color. Variations occur that might cause confusion with somewhat similar stink bugs in several genera, such as Stiretrus, Oplomus, and Perillus, but these other bugs have obtuse humeri, or at least lack the distinct humeral spine that is present in adults of Euthyrhynchus. In addition, species of these genera Figure 1. Adult of the Florida predatory stink bug, Euthyrhynchus known to occur in Florida have a short spine or tubercle floridanus (L.), feeding on a beetle. situated on the lower surface of the front femur behind the Credits: Lyle J.
  • Highlights in the History of Entomology in Hawaii 1778-1963

    Highlights in the History of Entomology in Hawaii 1778-1963

    Pacific Insects 6 (4) : 689-729 December 30, 1964 HIGHLIGHTS IN THE HISTORY OF ENTOMOLOGY IN HAWAII 1778-1963 By C. E. Pemberton HONORARY ASSOCIATE IN ENTOMOLOGY BERNICE P. BISHOP MUSEUM PRINCIPAL ENTOMOLOGIST (RETIRED) EXPERIMENT STATION, HAWAIIAN SUGAR PLANTERS' ASSOCIATION CONTENTS Page Introduction 690 Early References to Hawaiian Insects 691 Other Sources of Information on Hawaiian Entomology 692 Important Immigrant Insect Pests and Biological Control 695 Culex quinquefasciatus Say 696 Pheidole megacephala (Fabr.) 696 Cryptotermes brevis (Walker) 696 Rhabdoscelus obscurus (Boisduval) 697 Spodoptera exempta (Walker) 697 Icerya purchasi Mask. 699 Adore tus sinicus Burm. 699 Peregrinus maidis (Ashmead) 700 Hedylepta blackburni (Butler) 700 Aedes albopictus (Skuse) 701 Aedes aegypti (Linn.) 701 Siphanta acuta (Walker) 701 Saccharicoccus sacchari (Ckll.) 702 Pulvinaria psidii Mask. 702 Dacus cucurbitae Coq. 703 Longuiungis sacchari (Zehnt.) 704 Oxya chinensis (Thun.) 704 Nipaecoccus nipae (Mask.) 705 Syagrius fulvitarsus Pasc. 705 Dysmicoccus brevipes (Ckll.) 706 Perkinsiella saccharicida Kirk. 706 Anomala orientalis (Waterhouse) 708 Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki 710 Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) 710 690 Pacific Insects Vol. 6, no. 4 Tarophagus proserpina (Kirk.) 712 Anacamptodes fragilaria (Grossbeck) 713 Polydesma umbricola Boisduval 714 Dacus dorsalis Hendel 715 Spodoptera mauritia acronyctoides (Guenee) 716 Nezara viridula var. smaragdula (Fab.) 717 Biological Control of Noxious Plants 718 Lantana camara var. aculeata 119 Pamakani,
  • Comparison of Pheromone Trap Design and Lures for Spodoptera Frugiperda in Togo and Genetic Characterization of Moths Caught

    Comparison of Pheromone Trap Design and Lures for Spodoptera Frugiperda in Togo and Genetic Characterization of Moths Caught

    DOI: 10.1111/eea.12795 Comparison of pheromone trap design and lures for Spodoptera frugiperda in Togo and genetic characterization of moths caught Robert L. Meagher Jr1* ,KomiAgboka2, Agbeko Kodjo Tounou2,DjimaKoffi3,Koffi Aquilas Agbevohia2,Tomfe€ı Richard Amouze2, Kossi Mawuko Adjevi2 &RodneyN. Nagoshi1 1USDA-ARS CMAVE, Insect Behavior and Biocontrol Research Unit, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA , 2Ecole Superieure d’Agronomie, UniversitedeLome, 01 BP 1515, Lome 1, Togo , and 3Africa Regional Postgraduate Programme in Insect Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana Accepted: 29 November 2018 Key words: fall armyworm, monitoring, host strain markers, maize, Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, integrated pest management, IPM, rice, Leucania loreyi, COI gene, Tpi gene Abstract Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a pest of grain and vegetable crops endemic to the Western Hemisphere that has recently become widespread in sub- Saharan Africa and has appeared in India. An important tool for monitoring S. frugiperda in the USA is pheromone trapping, which would be of value for use with African populations. Field experiments were conducted in Togo (West Africa) to compare capture of male fall armyworm using three com- mercially available pheromone lures and three trap designs. The objectives were to identify optimum trap 9 lure combinations with respect to sensitivity, specificity, and cost. Almost 400 moths were captured during the experiment. Differences were found in the number of S. frugiperda moths cap- tured in the various trap designs and with the three pheromone lures, and in the number of non-tar- get moths captured with each lure. The merits of each trap 9 lure combination are discussed with respect to use in Africa.
  • Armyworms Factsheet

    Armyworms Factsheet

    Fact sheet Plant biosecurity: ENT-15 Armyworms There are a number of armyworms and loopers commonly found in the Northern Territory (NT), these include cluster caterpillar (Spodoptera litura), day-feeding armyworm (Spodoptera exempta), lawn-feeding armyworm (Spodoptera Mauritia) and Oriental armyworm (Mythimna separata). They are not to be confused with fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda), which is an exotic species. This group of insects is commonly called ‘armyworm’ because they will often ‘march’ in large numbers to find foo. Distribution • Cluster caterpillar (Spodoptera litura): Asia (widespread), Africa (Ghana, Réunion), North America (USA), Europe (France, Portugal, Russian Federation) and Oceania (widespread). • Day-feeding armyworm (Spodoptera exempta): Asia (widespread), Africa (widespread), • Lawn-feeding armyworm (Spodoptera Mauritia): Asia (widespread), Africa (widespread), North America (USA) and Oceania (widespread). • Northern armyworm (Mythimna separate): Asia (widespread), Europe (Russian Federation) and Oceania (widespread). • Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda): North America (widespread), South America (widespread), Africa (widespread), Asia (widespread) and, recently, Australia (Torres Strait and Queensland). Appearance Cluster caterpillar (Spodoptera litura) Eggs are spherical, pale pink and 0.6mm in diameter. They are laid in clusters of up to 300 and are covered in a layer of pale-brown ‘furry or cottony’ hair-like scales. Young larvae have a partly translucent green body with a dark thorax and head. Half-grown larvae are variable in colour and have a red and yellow pattern with green lines and black spots running along each side of the body. There is a dark patch on the ‘hump’ behind the head. Mature larvae are brown with three thin, pale yellow/orange lines running down the length of the body.
  • Introduction to Fall Armyworm

    Introduction to Fall Armyworm

    Introduction to fall armyworm: background, introduction to Africa, its identification and management options Srinivasan Ramasamy (SRINI) Flagship Program Leader – Safe & Sustainable Value Chains, and Lead Entomologist World Vegetable Center (WorldVeg) Shanhua, Tainan, Taiwan [email protected] Armyworms • Genus Spodoptera, in the family Noctuidae • Known to contain 31 species worldwide (Pogue, 2002) Armyworms in Africa Seven Spodoptera species known to occur • Spodoptera exigua (Beet armyworm) • Spodoptera littoralis (African cotton leafworm) • Spodoptera mauritia (Lawn armyworm) • Spodoptera exempta (African armyworm) • Spodoptera triturata (Lawn worm) • Spodoptera cilium (Dark Mottled Willow) • Spodoptera malagasy (Madagascar armyworm) (Pogue, 2002; Brown & Dewhurst, 1975) Spodoptera exigua Spodoptera littoralis http://www.pyrgus.de/Spodoptera_exigua_en.html http://www.pyrgus.de/Spodoptera_littoralis_en.html Spodoptera Spodoptera mauritia exempta Wikipedia © Buck Richardson Spodoptera Spodoptera triturata cilium © Nick Dean © Jim Hodgkinson Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) • Native to Americas - the tropical regions of the Americas from the United States to Argentina and the Caribbean region (Pogue, 2002) Fall armyworm in Africa Season Crop Location Country January 2016 Maize Rainforest zone of South-West Nigeria and IITA (Ibadan & Ikenne) February – Maize --- Northern Nigeria, March 2016 Benin, Togo April 2016 Maize --- São Tomé and Príncipe June 2016 Maize Edo and some adjacent states Nigera in the South West • Subsequently,
  • Predation by Podisus Maculiventris on Different Life Stages of Nezara Viridula

    Predation by Podisus Maculiventris on Different Life Stages of Nezara Viridula

    De Clercq et al.: Predation by Podisus on Nezara 197 PREDATION BY PODISUS MACULIVENTRIS ON DIFFERENT LIFE STAGES OF NEZARA VIRIDULA PATRICK DE CLERCQ1, KRIS WYCKHUYS1, HARLEY N. DE OLIVEIRA2 AND JOHANNETTE KLAPWIJK3 1Department of Crop Protection, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium 2Department of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, 36571-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil 3Koppert BV, P.O.Box 155, NL-2650 AD Berkel en Rodenrijs, The Netherlands ABSTRACT Predation capacity of fourth instars and male and female adults of Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on the different life stages of the southern green stinkbug Nezara viridula (L.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) was measured in the laboratory. Both nymphal and adult predators displayed high predation rates on eggs, nymphs and adults of the southern green stinkbug. However, developmental times of fourth instar P. maculiven- tris on eggs or nymphal instars of N. viridula were longer than on fifth instars of the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), suggesting that N. viridula is suboptimal prey for the spined soldier bug. Preference experiments in which fourth instar P. maculiventris were given a choice between fourth instars of N. viridula and fifth instars of S. littoralis indicated that the stinkbugs were less vulnerable to predation than the caterpillars, mainly because of their greater agility. The potential role of P. macu- liventris in augmentation or conservation biological control of the southern green stinkbug in greenhouse and field crops is discussed. Key Words: Nezara viridula, Podisus maculiventris, Asopinae, predator, biological control RESUMEN La capacidad de depredación de cuartos instares y macho y hembra adultos de Podisus ma- culiventris (Say) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) sobre los diferentes estados del chinche verde hediondo sureño Nezara viridula (L.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) fue medida en el labora- torio.
  • THE APPARENT METAMORPHOSIS and RELATED DEFENSE REACTIONS of HAEMOCYTES in the LAWN ARMYWORM, SPODOPTERA MAURITIA ACRONYCTOIDES (Guene'e)

    THE APPARENT METAMORPHOSIS and RELATED DEFENSE REACTIONS of HAEMOCYTES in the LAWN ARMYWORM, SPODOPTERA MAURITIA ACRONYCTOIDES (Guene'e)

    oIII o... ell r0­ oO Z (I) (I) TE CHNICAL BULLE TIN No. 104 FEB RUARY 1980 (I) :l :::> ~ :0 THE APPARENT METAMORPHOSIS AND RELATED DEFENSE REACTIONS OF HAEMOCYTES IN THE LAWN ARMYWORM, SPODOPTERA MAURITIA ACRONYCTOIDES (Guene'e) GERALD H. TAKEI AND MINORU TAMASHIRO HAWAII AGRICULTURAL ExPERIMENT STATION, UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII THE AUTHORS Gerald H. Ta kc i is current ly with the Hawaii Epidemiologic Studies Program , Pacific Biomedical Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa. Minoru Tam ashiro is Professor of En tomology an d Entomo logist, Dep artment of Entomology, Co llege o f Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii. CONTENTS Page /\ BST RACT 2 INT RO DUCTI O N 3 MATER IA LS AN D METHODS. .. .. .... .. .. 5 RESULTS G Hacmocyt cs in Control S. mauritia G Hacmocy tcs in Armywo rm s Subject ed to Treatments of Pathogen s 19 SU~ IMARY AN D DISCUSS ION 27 R EF ERENCES 38 ABSTRACT Ph ysiop athol ogi cal studies in vo lvin g t he law n ar m y w orm, Spodoptcra m auri u a ac ro nyctoidcs [Gu en ce} and tw o pa t hogen s fo u nd asso ciated w ith it ill Ha ioai i, a nu clear poly hedr osis virus (N P V) and a microsporidian , Vairimorpha, have revealed th at th e hue m ocy tes in th is host ins ect change ill quantit y, f orm , and act iuit y ioith. growt h and devel opment du ring the larval and early pupal st ages.
  • Heteroptera: Hemiptera ) from Chhattisgarh, India

    Heteroptera: Hemiptera ) from Chhattisgarh, India

    BISWAS et al.: On an account of Pentatomoidea.....from Chhattisgarh, India ISSN 0375-1511211 Rec. zool. Surv. India : 114(Part-2) : 211-231, 2014 ON AN ACCOUNT OF PENTATOMOIDEA (HETEROPTERA: HEMIPTERA ) FROM CHHATTISGARH, INDIA B. BISWAS, M. E. HASSAN, KAILASH CHANDRA, SANDEEP KUSHWAHA** AND PARAMITA MUKHERJEE Zoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata-700053, India ** Zoological Survey of India, Central Zone Regional Centre, Vijay Nagar, Jabalpur-482002 INTRODUCTION SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNT The pentatomids are commonly known as Family I PENTATOMIDAE “shield bugs” or “stink bugs” as their bodies are Subfamily PENTATOMINAE usually covered by a shield shaped scutellum covering more than half of the abdomen, tibia with Tribe ANTESTINI weak or no spine, 5 segmented antennae which Genus 1. Antestia Stal, 1864 gives its family name and most of them emit an 1. Antestia anchora (Thunberg) unpleasant odour, offensive in nature, produced by a pair of glands in the thorax and is released through *2. Antestia cruciata (Fabricius) openings in the metathorax. Although majority Genus 2. Plautia Stal, 1867 of these bugs are plant sucking, the members *3. Plautia crossota (Fabricius) belonging to the family Asopinae are wholly or partially predaceous. Pentatomoidea is one of the Tribe AGONOSCELIDINI largest superfamilies of Heteroptera comprising of Genus 3. Agonoscelis Spin, 1837 1301 genera and 7182 species distributed in sixteen 4. Agonoscelis nubilis (Fabricius) families all over the world (Henry, 2009). Of these, family Pentatomidae alone represents 896 genera Tribe CARPOCORINI and 4722 species distributed in eight subfamilies Genus 4. Gulielmus Distant, 1901 (Pentatominae, Asopinae, Podopinae, Edessinae, 5. Gulielmus laterarius Distant Phyllocephalinae, Discocephalinae, Cyrtocorinae and Serbaninae).
  • Great Lakes Entomologist the Grea T Lakes E N Omo L O G Is T Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Vol

    Great Lakes Entomologist the Grea T Lakes E N Omo L O G Is T Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Vol

    The Great Lakes Entomologist THE GREA Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Vol. 45, Nos. 3 & 4 Fall/Winter 2012 Volume 45 Nos. 3 & 4 ISSN 0090-0222 T LAKES Table of Contents THE Scholar, Teacher, and Mentor: A Tribute to Dr. J. E. McPherson ..............................................i E N GREAT LAKES Dr. J. E. McPherson, Educator and Researcher Extraordinaire: Biographical Sketch and T List of Publications OMO Thomas J. Henry ..................................................................................................111 J.E. McPherson – A Career of Exemplary Service and Contributions to the Entomological ENTOMOLOGIST Society of America L O George G. Kennedy .............................................................................................124 G Mcphersonarcys, a New Genus for Pentatoma aequalis Say (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) IS Donald B. Thomas ................................................................................................127 T The Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) of Missouri Robert W. Sites, Kristin B. Simpson, and Diane L. Wood ............................................134 Tymbal Morphology and Co-occurrence of Spartina Sap-feeding Insects (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) Stephen W. Wilson ...............................................................................................164 Pentatomoidea (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae, Scutelleridae) Associated with the Dioecious Shrub Florida Rosemary, Ceratiola ericoides (Ericaceae) A. G. Wheeler, Jr. .................................................................................................183
  • Modeling Hydroprene Effects on Eggs and 5 Instar Wandering Phase Larvae of the Indianmeal Moth, Plodia Interpunctella

    Modeling Hydroprene Effects on Eggs and 5 Instar Wandering Phase Larvae of the Indianmeal Moth, Plodia Interpunctella

    MODELING HYDROPRENE EFFECTS ON EGGS AND 5th INSTAR WANDERING PHASE LARVAE OF THE INDIANMEAL MOTH, PLODIA INTERPUNCTELLA (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) by SIVAKUMAR MOHANDASS B.Sc., (Agriculture) Mahathma Phule Agriculture University, 1998 __________________________________________________________ A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Entomology College of Agriculture KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2005 ABSTRACT The control of Indianmeal moth [Plodia interpunctella (Hübner)], a commonly found serious stored product pest around the world, relies mainly upon chemical control methods. Because of recent changes in the laws and regulations governing pesticide usage in the United States, there is an increasing need for finding safer chemicals to control insect pests. Hydroprene, an insect growth regulator, is considered to be a safe alternative. In this study, I quantified the effects of hydroprene on two critical life stages of Indianmeal moth, the eggs and 5th instar wandering phase larvae. Maximum development time in the untreated controls was 13.6 ± 0.6 d at 16°C and minimum development time was 2.3 ± 0.4 d at 32°C. At 20°C and 24°C, the effect of hydroprene on egg development became more evident; development time generally increased with exposure interval, with some variability in the data. The mean egg mortality among all temperatures was 7.3 ± 4.6%. Among the treatments, mortality of eggs increased as the exposure periods increased within any given temperature, with a dramatic increase in mortality with increase in temperature. Egg mortality was lowest at 16°C when exposed for 1 h (0 ± 3%), but mortality gradually increased up to 32 ± 3% when exposed for 18 h.