DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Pocahontas County, West Virginia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Pocahontas County, West Virginia United States In cooperation with Department of West Virginia Agricultural Soil Survey of Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station; United States Natural Department of Agriculture, Pocahontas County, Resources Forest Service; and Conservation Pocahontas County West Virginia Service Commission 3 How to Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is the color map preceding the detailed soil maps, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps follow the general soil map. These maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets, which precedes the soil maps. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map units symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. 4 This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1990. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1992. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1992. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service; the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station; the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; and the Pocahontas County Commission. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Greenbrier Valley Soil Conservation District. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250 or call 1-800-245-6340 (voice) or 202-720-1127 (TDD). USDA is an equal employment opportunity employer. Cover: A variety of landforms and land uses in the vicinity of Hillsboro, looking northeastward from the lookout tower at Droop Mountain Battlefield State Park. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available on the Natural Resources Conservation Service home page on the World Wide Web. The address is http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. 5 Contents Cover.......................................................................1 BaC—Belmont silt loam, 8 to 15 percent How to Use This Soil Survey..................................3 slopes....................................................31 Contents..................................................................5 BaD—Belmont silt loam, 15 to 25 percent Foreword.................................................................9 slopes....................................................32 General Nature of the County.................................11 BbC—Belmont silt loam, 3 to 15 percent Settlement..........................................................11 slopes, very rocky..................................33 Farming..............................................................12 BbE—Belmont silt loam, 15 to 35 percent Physiography, Relief, and Drainage....................12 slopes, very rocky..................................35 Climate...............................................................12 BbF—Belmont silt loam, 35 to 55 percent Geology..............................................................13 slopes, very rocky..................................36 How This Survey Was Made...................................16 BeB—Berks channery silt loam, 3 to General Soil Map Units........................................19 8 percent slopes....................................37 Dominantly Mesic Soils Formed in Alluvium BeC—Berks channery silt loam, 8 to Derived From Sandstone, Siltstone, Shale, 15 percent slopes..................................37 Limestone, or Chert............................................19 BeD—Berks channery silt loam, 15 to 1.Potomac-Tioga-Holly.............................19 25 percent slopes..................................38 2.Allegheny-Atkins....................................19 BeE—Berks channery silt loam, 25 to Dominantly Mesic Soils Formed in 35 percent slopes..................................39 Material Derived From Level-Bedded BfC—Berks channery silt loam, 3 to Sandstone, Siltstone, Shale, Limestone, 15 percent slopes, very stony................40 or Chert..............................................................20 BfE—Berks channery silt loam, 15 to 3.Duffield-Lodi-Belmont............................20 35 percent slopes, very stony................41 4.Cateache-Shouns-Belmont....................20 BfF—Berks channery silt loam, 35 to Dominantly Mesic Soils Formed in Material 55 percent slopes, very stony................42 Derived From Folded Sandstone, Siltstone, BgC—Berks-Dekalb complex, 3 to Shale, Limestone, or Chert.................................21 15 percent slopes, very stony................43 5.Blackthorn-Faywood-Berks....................21 BgE—Berks-Dekalb complex, 15 to 6.Calvin-Shouns.......................................21 35 percent slopes, very stony................44 7.Berks-Weikert........................................23 BgF—Berks-Dekalb complex, 35 to 8.Dekalb-Calvin-Mertz-Elliber...................23 55 percent slopes, very stony................45 Dominantly Frigid Soils Formed in Material BhG—Berks, Weikert, and Calvin soils, Derived From Level-Bedded Sandstone, 55 to 80 percent slopes, very stony.......46 Siltstone, and Shale...........................................24 BlC—Blackthorn channery loam, 3 to 9.Mandy-Snowdog-Gauley.......................24 15 percent slopes, extremely stony.......47 10.Mandy...................................................24 BlE—Blackthorn channery loam, 15 to Detailed Soil Map Units........................................27 35 percent slopes, extremely stony.......48 Soil Descriptions................................................28 BlF—Blackthorn channery loam, 35 to AlB—Allegheny loam, 3 to 8 percent 55 percent slopes, extremely stony.......49 slopes....................................................28 BoB—Blairton silt loam, 3 to 8 percent AlC—Allegheny loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes....................................................49 slopes....................................................29 BrF—Briery-Rock outcrop complex, very At—Atkins silt loam........................................29 steep.....................................................50 BaB—Belmont silt loam, 3 to 8 percent CaC—Calvin channery silt loam, 8 to slopes....................................................30 15 percent slopes..................................51 6 CbC—Calvin channery silt loam, 3 to DuC—Duffield silt loam, 8 to 15 percent 15 percent slopes, very stony ................ 52 slopes .................................................... 76 CbE—Calvin channery silt loam, 15 to ElF—Elliber extremely channery silt loam, 35 percent slopes, very stony ................ 54 35 to 55 percent slopes ......................... 77 CbF—Calvin channery silt loam, 35 to FaC—Faywood silt loam, 3 to 15 percent 55 percent slopes, very stony ................ 55 slopes, very rocky.................................. 77 CdC—Calvin-Dekalb-Berks complex, 3 to FaE—Faywood silt loam, 15 to 35 percent 15 percent slopes, very stony ................ 56 slopes, very rocky.................................. 78 CdE—Calvin-Dekalb-Berks complex, 15 to FaF—Faywood silt loam, 35 to 55 percent 35 percent slopes, very stony ................ 57 slopes, very rocky.................................. 79 CdF—Calvin-Dekalb-Berks complex, 35 to GaC—Gauley channery sandy loam, 3 to 55 percent slopes, very stony ................ 58 15 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 80 CeB—Cateache channery silt loam, 3 to GaE—Gauley channery sandy loam, 15 to 8 percent slopes .................................... 59 35 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 81 CeC—Cateache channery silt
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West Virginia Trail Inventory
    West Virginia Trail Inventory Trail report summarized by county, prepared by the West Virginia GIS Technical Center updated 9/24/2014 County Name Trail Name Management Area Managing Organization Length Source (mi.) Date Barbour American Discovery American Discovery Trail 33.7 2009 Trail Society Barbour Brickhouse Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.55 2013 Barbour Brickhouse Spur Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 2.73 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Shortcut Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.46 2013 Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.02 2013 Connector Barbour Double Dip Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.2 2013 Barbour Hospital Loop Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.29 2013 Barbour Indian Burial Ground Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Kid's Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.4 2011 Resources Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.07 2011 Access Resources Barbour Prologue Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.63 2013 Barbour River Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.26 2013 Barbour Rock Cliff Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.21 2011 Resources Barbour Rock Pinch Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.51 2013 Barbour Short course Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.1 2013 Barbour
    [Show full text]
  • “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long
    STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE i “A people who have not the pride to record their History will not long have virtues to make History worth recording; and Introduction no people who At the rear of Old Main at Bethany College, the sun shines through are indifferent an arcade. This passageway is filled with students today, just as it was more than a hundred years ago, as shown in a c.1885 photograph. to their past During my several visits to this college, I have lingered here enjoying the light and the student activity. It reminds me that we are part of the past need hope to as well as today. People can connect to historic resources through their make their character and setting as well as the stories they tell and the memories they make. future great.” The National Register of Historic Places recognizes historic re- sources such as Old Main. In 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office Virgil A. Lewis, first published Historic West Virginia which provided brief descriptions noted historian of our state’s National Register listings. This second edition adds approx- Mason County, imately 265 new listings, including the Huntington home of Civil Rights West Virginia activist Memphis Tennessee Garrison, the New River Gorge Bridge, Camp Caesar in Webster County, Fort Mill Ridge in Hampshire County, the Ananias Pitsenbarger Farm in Pendleton County and the Nuttallburg Coal Mining Complex in Fayette County. Each reveals the richness of our past and celebrates the stories and accomplishments of our citizens. I hope you enjoy and learn from Historic West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of West Virginia
    Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig­ inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer­ son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Outdoor Recreation Resource Amenity Indices for West Virginia
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2008 Development of outdoor recreation resource amenity indices for West Virginia Jing Wang West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Wang, Jing, "Development of outdoor recreation resource amenity indices for West Virginia" (2008). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 2680. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/2680 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Development of Outdoor Recreation Resource Amenity Indices for West Virginia Jing Wang Thesis submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Consumer Sciences At West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Recreation, Parks, and Tourism Resources Jinyang Deng, Ph.D., Chair Chad
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of the Law Books
    THE BATTLE OF THE LAW BOOKS Mark W. Podvia† LMOST ALL AMERICANS ARE FAMILIAR with such Civil War bat- tles as Gettysburg, Antietam, Bull Run, Shiloh, Chickamauga, Chancellorsville, and Fredericksburg. However, most have never heard of an 1863 battle that was fought between Union Aand Confederate forces in Greenbrier County, located in what is now southeastern West Virginia. The battle was known alternatively as The Battle of White Sulphur Springs, The Battle of Dry Creek, The Battle of Rocky Gap, and The Battle of Howard’s Creek.1 The clash has one addi- tional name: The Battle of the Law Books.2 During the 1830-31 legislative year, the Virginia General Assembly adopted three acts that reorganized the Commonwealth’s judicial system. As part of the reorganization, the legislature determined that the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals should, in addition to sitting in the state capitol (Richmond), † Mr. Podvia is University Librarian at the West Virginia University College of Law. He is a member of the Emeritus Faculty of The Pennsylvania State University. Copyright 2019 Mark W. Podvia. 1 ERIC J. WITTENBERG, THE BATTLE OF WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS: AVERELL FAILS TO SECURE WEST VIRGINIA 16 (2011). 2 Id. It was not unusual for Civil War battles to have two or more names. Union troops tended to name battles after natural features, while Confederate soldiers usually named them after towns or buildings. 23 GREEN BAG 2D 43 Mark W. Podvia The Greenbrier County Courthouse (pictured here circa 1908) was built in 1837 and still stands (and serves) today at 912 Court Street North in Lewisburg, West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • 'O'er Mountains and Rivers': Community and Commerce
    MCCARTNEY, SARAH ELLEN, Ph.D. ‘O’er Mountains and Rivers’: Community and Commerce in the Greenbrier Valley in the Late Eighteenth Century. (2018) Directed by Dr. Greg O’Brien. 464 pp. In the eighteenth-century Greenbrier River Valley of present-day West Virginia, identity was based on a connection to “place” and the shared experiences of settlement, commerce, and warfare as settlers embraced an identity as Greenbrier residents, Virginians, and Americans. In this dissertation, I consider the Greenbrier Valley as an early American place participating in and experiencing events and practices that took place throughout the American colonies and the Atlantic World, while simultaneously becoming a discrete community and place where these experiences formed a unique Greenbrier identity. My project is the first study of the Greenbrier Valley to situate the region temporally within the revolutionary era and geographically within the Atlantic World. For many decades Greenbrier Valley communities were at the western edge of Virginia’s backcountry settlements in what was often an “ambiguous zone” of European control and settlers moved in and out of the region with the ebb and flow of frontier violence. Settlers arriving in the region came by way of the Shenandoah Valley where they traveled along the Great Wagon Road before crossing into the Greenbrier region through the mountain passes and rivers cutting across the Allegheny Mountains. Without a courthouse or church, which were the typical elements of community in eighteenth- century Virginia society, until after the American Revolution, Greenbrier settlers forged the bonds of their community through other avenues, including the shared hardships of the settlement experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study
    Appalachian Forest Heritage Area Feasibility Study Examination of Future Directions and Feasibility / Suitability for National Heritage Area Designation Credits Scott Gerloff, CEO Potomac Heritage Partnership and Historic Connections, LLC, Consultant for the Feasibility Study. Phyllis Baxter, AFHA Senior Project Coordinator Jeremy Morris, AFHA Associate Project Coordinator AFHA Principal Investigators: Steven Selin, PhD. Professor Recreation, Parks, and Tourism Resources Program, West Virginia University David McGill, PhD. Associate Professor, Forest Management Program, West Virginia University Kenneth E. Martin, Ph.D., Extension Professor and Director Center for Community, Economic and Workforce Development, West Virginia University Extension Service George Constantz, PhD. Manager of the Education Program, Canaan Valley Institute Photo Credits: Stanley J. Anderson, Augusta Heritage Center, Ruth Barrho, Phyllis Baxter, David Clark, Lenna Hinkle, David McGill, Steven Selin, U.S. Forest Service, WV Wood Technology Center Partial funding was furnished by the West Virginia University Institute of Technology EDA University Center from funds received from the Economic Development Agency Department of Commerce. Additional funding from the West Virginia Cultural Heritage Tourism Program, which is overseen by Preservation Alliance of West Virginia and West Virginia Development Office, from funds received from the Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation. Additional funding from the National Forest Foundation. Support for Maryland meetings provided by Potomac Heritage Partnership. Staff, faculty, and students from the AFHA project at the WVU Division of Forestry and WVU Extension Service funded by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No. 2001- 36201-11282. (Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Walk Across West Virginia Route Descriptions
    WWAALLKK AACCRROOSSSS WWEESSTT VVIIRRGGIINNIIAA RROOUUTTEE DDEESSCCRRIIPPTTIIOONNSS Few of us have the time to actually Walk Across West Virginia (WAWV), but we can do a virtual Walk Across West Virginia by walking a distance equal to walking across the state. On the following pages are descriptions of five routes across West Virginia. Two are existing trails, two are hypothetical straight line routes through the geographical center of the state and one is a combination of trails and public roads. The longest route across the state is 281 miles. If you walked 5.5 miles a week or 21.5 miles a month, in your local neighborhood, you would equal the longest distance in less than a year. So why not set a personal goal of Walking Across West Virginia this year! Record the date you reach a specific mileage point on one of the routes to track your progress. You can use the mileage tracking chart found on the WAWV website to track your accumulated miles. Include your family members in your trip. You might enhance the “virtual” experience by actually walking parts of the existing trails nearest you, or by visiting some of the areas traversed by the hypothetical routes. The West to East route across the state also includes “trivia questions” about West Virginia. See how much you know about West Virginia.! Allegheny Trail Milage Listing Date Mileage Elevation Description _____ 0.0 2182 Pennsylvania/West Virginia State Line close to Bruceton Mills on Local Route 4 _____ 8.0 1495 Cross under I-68 _____ 13.3 1693 Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • "Impracticable, Inhospitable, and Dismal Country": an Examination of the Environmental Impact on Civil War Military Op
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2018 "Impracticable, inhospitable, and dismal country": An examination of the environmental impact on Civil War military operations in West Virginia John Martin McMillan [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Military History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation McMillan, John Martin, ""Impracticable, inhospitable, and dismal country": An examination of the environmental impact on Civil War military operations in West Virginia" (2018). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. 1147. https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/1147 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. “IMPRACTICABLE, INHOSPITABLE, AND DISMAL COUNTRY”: AN EXAMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ON CIVIL WAR MILITARY OPERATIONS IN WEST VIRGINIA A thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In History by John Martin McMillan Approved by Dr. Michael E. Woods, Committee Chairperson Dr. Kevin Barksdale Dr. Robert Deal MARSHALL UNIVERSITY MAY 2018 © 2018 John Martin McMillan ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii DEDICATION To Big For trips in the “Gray Van” to Shiloh and Lookout Mountain, I am continually thankful. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Enjoying the process is a necessity for any worthwhile endeavor – a master’s thesis is one such exertion. With the completion of this thesis, I owe much thanks to many people.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Monterey Quadrangle
    DESCRIPTION OF THE MONTEREY QUADRANGLE. GEOGRAPHY. York to Alabama, and the lowlands of Tennessee, ing the lesser valleys along the outcrops of the Fork of Cheat River, which has considerable vol­ Kentucky, and Ohio. Its northwestern boundary softer rocks. These longitudinal streams empty ume at an altitude of 4000 feet and flows north | General relations. The Monterey quadrangle is indefinite, but may be regarded as into a number of larger, transverse rivers, which with moderate declivity, out of the northwestern | embraces the quarter of a square degree which an arbitrary line coinciding with the cross one or the other of the barriers limiting the corner of the quadrangle. I division. lies between parallels. 38° and 38° 30' north lati­ mlennessee V».Kiver from» northeasti '-*/Mis­ - valley. In the northern portion of the province The principal mountain ranges of the Monterey j tude and meridians 79° 30' and 80°. It measures sissippi to its mouth, and then crossing the States they form the Delaware, Susquehanna, Potomac, quadrangle are Warm Spring Mountain, Jack | approximately 34.5 miles from north to south and of Indiana and Ohio to western New York. Its James, and Roanoke rivers, each of which passes Mountain, Back Creek Mountain, Little 27.3 miles from east to west, and its area is about eastern boundary is defined by the Allegheny through the Appalachian Mountains in a narrow Mountain, Allegheny Mountain, and 942 square miles. In Virginia it comprises the Front and the Cumberland escarpment. The gap and flows eastward to the sea. In the cen­ Back Allegheny Mountains. In the greater part of Bath County and the Locationof rocks of this division are almost entirely of sedi­ tral portion of the province, in Kentucky and southeastern corner of the quadrangle are Chest­ western portion of Highland County.
    [Show full text]
  • Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report
    ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE and DOMINION ENERGY TRANSMISSION, INC. SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT Implementation Plan EC26 Attachment 1 Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report Dominion ACP Augusta, Bath and Highland Counties, Virginia & Pocahontas and Randolph Counties, West Virginia August 30, 2017 19955 Highland Vista Drive, Suite 170 Ashburn, Virginia 20147 703-726-8030 19955 Highland Vista Dr., Suite 170 Ashburn, Virginia 20147 (703) 726-8030 www.geoconcepts-eng.com August 30, 2017 Colin Olness, PE Contractor Atlantic Coast Pipeline - Construction 99 Edmiston Way Buckhannon, WV 26201 Subject: Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report Dominion ACP, Augusta, Bath and Highland Counties, Virginia & Pocahontas and Randolph Counties, West Virginia (GeoConcepts Project No. 11002.04) Dear Mr. Olness: GeoConcepts Engineering, Inc. (GeoConcepts) is pleased to present this fracture analysis and existing dye trace report for the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Sincerely, GEOCONCEPTS ENGINEERING, INC. Joshua D. Valentino, PhD Robert K. Denton Jr., CPG, LPSS Senior Staff Geologist Senior Geologist [email protected] [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 1 Scope of Services ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia)
    Summits on the Air W8V (West Virginia) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S80.1 Issue number 1.0 Date of issue 01-July-2012 Participation start date 01-September-2012 Authorised Date: 01-September-2012 Association Manager John Huggins KX4O mailto:[email protected] Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Summits on the Air – ARM for W8V West Virginia Table of contents 1 CHANGE CONTROL .............................................................................................................. 3 2 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA...................................................................................... 4 2.1 PROGRAMME DERIVATION ................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Summit Qualification .................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Point Banding ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Border Summits ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 GENERAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]