DOCSLIB.ORG

'O'er Mountains and Rivers': Community and Commerce

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'O'er Mountains and Rivers': Community and Commerce MCCARTNEY, SARAH ELLEN, Ph.D. ‘O’er Mountains and Rivers’: Community and Commerce in the Greenbrier Valley in the Late Eighteenth Century. (2018) Directed by Dr. Greg O’Brien. 464 pp. In the eighteenth-century Greenbrier River Valley of present-day West Virginia, identity was based on a connection to “place” and the shared experiences of settlement, commerce, and warfare as settlers embraced an identity as Greenbrier residents, Virginians, and Americans. In this dissertation, I consider the Greenbrier Valley as an early American place participating in and experiencing events and practices that took place throughout the American colonies and the Atlantic World, while simultaneously becoming a discrete community and place where these experiences formed a unique Greenbrier identity. My project is the first study of the Greenbrier Valley to situate the region temporally within the revolutionary era and geographically within the Atlantic World. For many decades Greenbrier Valley communities were at the western edge of Virginia’s backcountry settlements in what was often an “ambiguous zone” of European control and settlers moved in and out of the region with the ebb and flow of frontier violence. Settlers arriving in the region came by way of the Shenandoah Valley where they traveled along the Great Wagon Road before crossing into the Greenbrier region through the mountain passes and rivers cutting across the Allegheny Mountains. Without a courthouse or church, which were the typical elements of community in eighteenth- century Virginia society, until after the American Revolution, Greenbrier settlers forged the bonds of their community through other avenues, including the shared hardships of the settlement experience. Beginning in 1771, a store established by brothers Sampson and George Mathews, who were merchants in Staunton, Virginia, in partnership with Greenbrier settler John Stuart formed a hub around which community developed as the store served as a place for Greenbrier settlers to exchange goods as well as a place to meet for social gatherings. Greenbrier settlers were active participants in the 1774 frontier expedition known as Lord Dunmore’s War as the Greenbrier Valley served as the rendezvous point for the army before they marched across miles of Appalachian terrain and faced the Shawnees on the banks of the Ohio River at Point Pleasant. Although Dunmore’s War strengthened settlers’ connections to place, the years of the American Revolution further cemented their communities as they sought to defend the region physically from the threat of Native American and British foes. The experience of violence and warfare during the Revolutionary War reinforced the bonds of community as settlers embraced an identity as Americans in addition to being Greenbrier settlers and Virginians. In the midst of the American Revolution, the process of community formation also resulted in settlers seeking legal recognition and protection for their homes as they petitioned to be recognized as a new Virginia county, named Greenbrier, which allowed them easier access to county courts where they could legitimize their land claims. At the end of the American Revolution, Greenbrier was still considered a backcountry; however, much had changed as a result of the revolutionary era and the region became a gateway for America’s western expansion. ‘O’ER MOUNTAINS AND RIVERS’: COMMUNITY AND COMMERCE IN THE GREENBRIER VALLEY IN THE LATE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY by Sarah Ellen McCartney A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Greensboro 2018 Approved by _____________________________ Committee Chair © 2018 Sarah Ellen McCartney To my Parents and Grandparents I am eternally grateful for the love, encouragement, and support you have given me in every task I have undertaken and every new adventure on which I have embarked. Thank you for helping develop in me a love of learning and a love of history. ii APPROVAL PAGE This dissertation written by Sarah Ellen McCartney has been approved by the following committee of the Faculty of The Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Committee Chair________________________________ Committee Members________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ____________________________ Date of Acceptance by Committee __________________________ Date of Final Oral Examination iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people supported me during the research and writing of this project, and without them it would not be complete today. While there are far too many to acknowledge individually, I hope to begin to express my appreciation here. I am truly grateful for my committee and their support and encouragement throughout this process. My advisor Greg O’Brien offered direction and enthusiasm for my project, as well as the camaraderie of being a Virginian living in North Carolina. Mark Elliott helped me to see the interconnectedness between my topic and the broader world and pushed me to better articulate the significance of my work. Linda Rupert’s enthusiasm for my scholarship encouraged me as she consistently challenged me to grapple with my sources and ask deeper questions. Lisa Tolbert provided an ah-ha moment for me as a new instructor, and I owe much of my approach to teaching, which overflows into research, to her as well as the reminder to “imagine Sisyphus happy.” Beyond my dissertation committee, numerous faculty in the UNCG History Department encouraged me along the journey. Special thanks also go to Kristina Wright, Laurie O’Neill, and Dawn Avolio for knowing the answers to all of my questions and for everything they do to keep the UNCG History Department running smoothly. This research would not have been possible without funding, and I was grateful to receive an Allen W. Trelease Graduate Fellowship and Graduate Student Travel Grants from the UNCG History Department. I am also grateful for support from the Virginia Museum of History and Culture (formerly the Virginia Historical Society) for a Betty Sams Christian Fellowship. iv In Lewisburg, West Virginia, Larry Heffner, Greenbrier Historical Society volunteer, was one of my greatest cheerleaders. He helped me sort through boxes of uncatalogued documents and track down pertinent locations on the landscape, while he and his wife Loretta opened their home to me during my research trips. Greenbrier Historical Society archivists James Talbert and Samuel Hale were enthusiastic about my project, directed me to sources, and kept me abreast of the latest archival findings. Archaeologists Stephen and Kim McBride were incredibly generous with their time and extensive knowledge of the Greenbrier Valley as they helped plot land surveys and toured me through the region’s revolutionary-era forts. Beyond Greenbrier County, archivists, librarians, scholars, and friends across several states have been vital to this project. The Augusta County Genealogical Society oriented me to the Augusta County Clerk’s Office in Staunton, Virginia. Neal Hurst, a Journeyman Tailor and Associate Curator of Costume and Textiles at the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, and public historians Anna Gruber Kiefer and Jason Melius answered long-distance questions about the practical side of clothing and supplying a backcountry militia. Scot and Connie Daniels, Jason and Katelyn Burton, Felicia Abrams, and Alaina Guerry, opened their homes to me during research trips. James Whittenburg, Carolyn Whittenburg, David Corlett, Jennifer Fox, Julie Richter, and myriad instructors and staff at the National Institute of American History and Democracy’s Pre-College Summer Program at the College of William and Mary have provided a yearly reminder of why I study and teach history in the first place. v I appreciate the support and encouragement of many colleagues at UNCG. I am deeply grateful to Jamie Mize for her friendship and support, as well as her willingness to read chapters and offer feedback. Justina Licata, Eric Oakley, and Hannah Dudley Shotwell were some of my first friends at UNCG, and I am thankful for their friendship over many years and their camaraderie through the writing process. Jeff Colbert and the lunch group were faithful supporters who made me laugh and kept things in perspective. I am also grateful for Laura-Michal Balderson, James Findley, Brian Lee, Ian Michie, Steven Peach, Robin Ritter, Joseph Ross, Deborah Russell, Jason Stroud, Virginia Summey, Jess Usher, Monica Ward, and Margaret Williams Carmack. Friendships that began during my Master’s degree at the College of William and Mary provided a sounding board for both research and life throughout this project. Elizabeth Cook went through the entire graduate school experience with me, beginning with our Master’s coursework and apprenticeships in the Colonial Williamsburg archaeology lab. Words cannot express my appreciation for her friendship through the years as well as her insights in research and writing. Drew Gruber and Katherine Egner Gruber are two of the most supportive people I know, and I am grateful for their friendship as well as their extensive expertise in many topics relevant to this project. Kaitlyn Gardy and Kathryn Lasdow cheered me along the journey and were only a text or email away for a quick brainstorm or question. Kristina Poznan and Leslie Waters were wonderful housemates for many summers, and discussions of research and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • X001132127.Pdf
    ' ' ., ,�- NONIMPORTATION AND THE SEARCH FOR ECONOMIC INDEPENDENCE IN VIRGINIA, 1765-1775 BRUCE ALLAN RAGSDALE Charlottesville, Virginia B.A., University of Virginia, 1974 M.A., University of Virginia, 1980 A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Corcoran Department of History University of Virginia May 1985 © Copyright by Bruce Allan Ragsdale All Rights Reserved May 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: 1 Chapter 1: Trade and Economic Development in Virginia, 1730-1775 13 Chapter 2: The Dilemma of the Great Planters 55 Chapter 3: An Imperial Crisis and the Origins of Commercial Resistance in Virginia 84 Chapter 4: The Nonimportation Association of 1769 and 1770 117 Chapter 5: The Slave Trade and Economic Reform 180 Chapter 6: Commercial Development and the Credit Crisis of 1772 218 Chapter 7: The Revival Of Commercial Resistance 275 Chapter 8: The Continental Association in Virginia 340 Bibliography: 397 Key to Abbreviations used in Endnotes WMQ William and Mary Quarterly VMHB Virginia Magazine of History and Biography Hening William Waller Hening, ed., The Statutes at Large; Being� Collection of all the Laws Qf Virginia, from the First Session of the Legislature in the year 1619, 13 vols. Journals of the House of Burgesses of Virginia Rev. Va. Revolutionary Virginia: The Road to Independence, 7 vols. LC Library of Congress PRO Public Record Office, London co Colonial Office UVA Manuscripts Department, Alderman Library, University of Virginia VHS Virginia Historical Society VSL Virginia State Library Introduction Three times in the decade before the Revolution. Vir­ ginians organized nonimportation associations as a protest against specific legislation from the British Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of James Mathews Sr
    Descendants of James Mathews Sr. Greg Matthews Table of Contents .Descendants . .of . .James . .Mathews . .Sr. 1. .First . Generation. 1. .Source . .Citations . 2. .Second . Generation. 3. .Source . .Citations . 9. .Third . Generation. 15. .Source . .Citations . 32. .Fourth . Generation. 47. .Source . .Citations . 88. .Fifth . Generation. 115. .Source . .Citations . 147. .Sixth . Generation. 169. .Source . .Citations . 192. Produced by Legacy Descendants of James Mathews Sr. First Generation 1. James Mathews Sr. {M},1 son of James Mathews and Unknown, was born about 1680 in Surry County, VA and died before Mar 1762 in Halifax County, NC. Noted events in his life were: • First appearance: First known record for James is as a minor in the Court Order Books, 4 Jun 1688, Charles City County, Virginia.2 Record mentions James and brother Thomas Charles Matthews and that both were minors. Record also mentions their unnamed mother and her husband Richard Mane. • Militia Service: Was rank soldier on 1701/2 Charles City County militia roll, 1702, Charles City County, Virginia.3 • Tax List: Appears on 1704 Prince George County Quit Rent Roll, 1704, Prince George County, Virginia.4 • Deed: First known deed for James Mathews Sr, 28 Apr 1708, Surry County, VA.5 On 28 Apr 1708 James Mathews and wife Jeane sold 100 acres of land to Timothy Rives of Prince George County. The land was bound by Freemans Branch and John Mitchell. Witnesses to the deed were William Rives and Robert Blight. • Deed: First land transaction in North Carolina, 7 May 1742, Edgecombe County, NC.6 Was granted 400 acres in North Carolina by the British Crown in the first known deed for James in NC.
    [Show full text]
  • Leedstown.Lwp
    Leedstown and Fincastle Jim Glanville Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Blue links in the footnotes are clickable The Winter 2010 Newsletter of the Northern Neck of Virginia Historical Society announced a February 27th, 2010 reenactment of the 243rd anniversary of the Leedstown Resolutions1 saying: "History will come to life along the streets of Tappahannock as NNVHS and the Essex County Museum and Historical Society combine to present dramatic reenactments of the famous 1766 Tappahannock Demonstrations to enforce the Leedstown Resolutions, against the wealthy and insolent Archibald Ritchie2 and the Scotsman Stamp Collector, Archibald McCall, who was tarred and feathered for his refusal to comply." Because I am interested in, and have written about, the pre-revolutionary-period Virginia County Resolutions I decided to attend. This article tells about the 1766 Leedstown Resolutions (adopted in Westmoreland County) and their February 2010 reenactment in Tappahannock. It also tells about the role of Richard Henry Lee during the buildup to revolution in Virginia and explores the connections between Westmoreland County and Fincastle County, which existed briefly from 1772-1776. Reenacting an event of 244 years earlier, Richard Henry Lee Richard Henry Lee confronts Archibald McCall (portrayed (portrayed by Ted Borek) acting on behalf of the Westmoreland by Dan McMahon) and his wife (portrayed by Judith Association confronts Archibald Ritchie (portrayed by Bob Bailey) Harris) on the steps of the extensively restored at Ritchie's front door in Tappahannock. Samuel Washington Brockenbrough-McCall House4 that is today a part of (portrayed by John Harris) stands with a cane. Bailey as Ritchie present day St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macroeconomic Effects of Banking Crises Evidence from the United Kingdom, 1750-1938 Kenny, Seán; Lennard, Jason; Turner, John D
    The Macroeconomic Effects of Banking Crises Evidence from the United Kingdom, 1750-1938 Kenny, Seán; Lennard, Jason; Turner, John D. 2017 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Kenny, S., Lennard, J., & Turner, J. D. (2017). The Macroeconomic Effects of Banking Crises: Evidence from the United Kingdom, 1750-1938. (Lund Papers in Economic History: General Issues; No. 165). Department of Economic History, Lund University. Total number of authors: 3 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Lund Papers in Economic History No. 165, 2017 General Issues The Macroeconomic Effects of Banking Crises: Evidence from the United Kingdom, 1750-1938 Seán Kenny, Jason Lennard & John D.
    [Show full text]
  • William Preston and the Revolutionary Settlement
    Journal of Backcountry Studies EDITOR’S NOTE: This is the third and last installment of the author’s 1990 University of Maryland dissertation, directed by Professor Emory Evans, to be republished in JBS. Dr. Osborn is President of Pacific Union College. William Preston and the Revolutionary Settlement BY RICHARD OSBORN Patriot (1775-1778) Revolutions ultimately conclude with a large scale resolution in the major political, social, and economic issues raised by the upheaval. During the final two years of the American Revolution, William Preston struggled to anticipate and participate in the emerging American regime. For Preston, the American Revolution involved two challenges--Indians and Loyalists. The outcome of his struggles with both groups would help determine the results of the Revolution in Virginia. If Preston could keep the various Indian tribes subdued with minimal help from the rest of Virginia, then more Virginians would be free to join the American armies fighting the English. But if he was unsuccessful, Virginia would have to divert resources and manpower away from the broader colonial effort to its own protection. The other challenge represented an internal one. A large number of Loyalist neighbors continually tested Preston's abilities to forge a unified government on the frontier which could, in turn, challenge the Indians effectivel y and the British, if they brought the war to Virginia. In these struggles, he even had to prove he was a Patriot. Preston clearly placed his allegiance with the revolutionary movement when he joined with other freeholders from Fincastle County on January 20, 1775 to organize their local county committee in response to requests by the Continental Congress that such committees be established.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide
    Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide Guide to the educational resources available on the GHS website Theme driven guide to: Online exhibits Biographical Materials Primary sources Classroom activities Today in Georgia History Episodes New Georgia Encyclopedia Articles Archival Collections Historical Markers Updated: July 2014 Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide Table of Contents Pre-Colonial Native American Cultures 1 Early European Exploration 2-3 Colonial Establishing the Colony 3-4 Trustee Georgia 5-6 Royal Georgia 7-8 Revolutionary Georgia and the American Revolution 8-10 Early Republic 10-12 Expansion and Conflict in Georgia Creek and Cherokee Removal 12-13 Technology, Agriculture, & Expansion of Slavery 14-15 Civil War, Reconstruction, and the New South Secession 15-16 Civil War 17-19 Reconstruction 19-21 New South 21-23 Rise of Modern Georgia Great Depression and the New Deal 23-24 Culture, Society, and Politics 25-26 Global Conflict World War One 26-27 World War Two 27-28 Modern Georgia Modern Civil Rights Movement 28-30 Post-World War Two Georgia 31-32 Georgia Since 1970 33-34 Pre-Colonial Chapter by Chapter Primary Sources Chapter 2 The First Peoples of Georgia Pages from the rare book Etowah Papers: Exploration of the Etowah site in Georgia. Includes images of the site and artifacts found at the site. Native American Cultures Opening America’s Archives Primary Sources Set 1 (Early Georgia) SS8H1— The development of Native American cultures and the impact of European exploration and settlement on the Native American cultures in Georgia. Illustration based on French descriptions of Florida Na- tive Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Conflicting Visions: England's Seventeenth-Century Colonies
    C H A P T E R 2 CONFLICTING VISIONS: ENGLAND’S SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY COLONIES SUMMARY In the seventeenth century, different and sometimes disparate groups of English settlers established several colonies in North America. The English way of colonization differed from that of the Spanish in that English colonization did not emanate from a desire to create a centralized empire in the New World. Breaking Away English migration to the New World was part of a larger pattern of mobility—the New World was just another destination. Some Englishmen migrated to the New World for economic reasons, leaving poverty and seeking land. Others came seeking religious opportunity or to avoid political strife and conflict in England. The Chesapeake: Dreams of Wealth In the early to mid-seventeenth century, the English established two successful but diverse colonies around the Chesapeake Bay—Virginia and Maryland. Entrepreneurs in Virginia In 1607, the London Company, a joint stock company, built Jamestown in Virginia. This colony, however, experienced numerous problems arising from a hostile natural environment, conflict with local Native Americans, the colonists’ failure to work for the common good, and unclear goals. Spinning Out of Control To save the colony, Captain John Smith took over the management of the town and imposed military order. The London Company also restructured the government and sent more people to keep the colony going. “Stinking Weed” One key to the eventual success of Virginia was the development by John Rolfe of tobacco as a commercial crop. London Company directors further attracted settlers by giving land grants (headrights), establishing elective local government (the House of Burgesses), and bringing women to the colony.
    [Show full text]
  • POINT PLEASANT 1774 Prelude to the American Revolution
    POINT PLEASANT 1774 Prelude to the American Revolution JOHN F WINKLER ILLUSTRATED BY PETER DENNIS © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CAMPAIGN 273 POINT PLEASANT 1774 Prelude to the American Revolution JOHN F WINKLER ILLUSTRATED BY PETER DENNIS Series editor Marcus Cowper © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 The strategic situation The Appalachian frontier The Ohio Indians Lord Dunmore’s Virginia CHRONOLOGY 17 OPPOSING COMMANDERS 20 Virginia commanders Indian commanders OPPOSING ARMIES 25 Virginian forces Indian forces Orders of battle OPPOSING PLANS 34 Virginian plans Indian plans THE CAMPAIGN AND BATTLE 38 From Baker’s trading post to Wakatomica From Wakatomica to Point Pleasant The battle of Point Pleasant From Point Pleasant to Fort Gower THE AFTERMATH 89 THE BATTLEFIELD TODAY 93 FURTHER READING 94 INDEX 95 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com 4 British North America in1774 British North NEWFOUNDLAND Lake Superior Quebec QUEBEC ISLAND OF NOVA ST JOHN SCOTIA Montreal Fort Michilimackinac Lake St Lawrence River MASSACHUSETTS Huron Lake Lake Ontario NEW Michigan Fort Niagara HAMPSHIRE Fort Detroit Lake Erie NEW YORK Boston MASSACHUSETTS RHODE ISLAND PENNSYLVANIA New York CONNECTICUT Philadelphia Pittsburgh NEW JERSEY MARYLAND Point Pleasant DELAWARE N St Louis Ohio River VANDALIA KENTUCKY Williamsburg LOUISIANA VIRGINIA ATLANTIC OCEAN NORTH CAROLINA Forts Cities and towns SOUTH Mississippi River CAROLINA Battlefields GEORGIA Political boundary Proposed or disputed area boundary
    [Show full text]
  • The Present State of Virginia, Rev. Hugh Jones, 1724, Excerpts
    National Humanities Center Resource Toolbox Becoming American: The British Atlantic Colonies, 1690-1763 Library of Congress “capable of great Improvements still” * Rev. Hugh Jones The Present State of VIRGINIA 1724__EXCERPTS Hugh Jones was an English clergyman called to serve in Virginia for two years as a “Mathe- matickal Professor” in the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg. On his return to England he discovered that “few people . have correct notions of the true state of the Herman Moll, A New Map of the North Parts of America , 1720, detail plantations [colonies].” Thus in 1724 he Herman Moll, A New Map of the North Parts of America, 1720, detail published The Present State of Virginia to “few people in England . have correct Notions inform his English audience of the colony’s “few people in England . have correct Notions government, peoples, economic and religious of the true State of the Plantations” of the true State of the Plantations” state, etc., and to promote his plan to transport the English “poor and vagabonds” to Virginia as a non-African labor supply. INTRODUCTION_____ When I considered the great Benefit that arises to the Public from the large colony of Virginia, I observed that though it be thus advantageous, yet it is capable of great Improvements still, and requires several Alterations, both with Regard to its own Welfare, and the Interest of Great Britain. Observing moreover, that few people in England (even many concerned in public affairs of this kind) have correct Notions of the true State of the Plantations, and having been eagerly applied to frequently by Persons of the greatest Figure, Experience and Judgment in political and national Concerns, for Information concern- ing all the Circumstances of Virginia, I was requested to digest methodically and publish what I knew and thought of these Matters; and being in a great Measure enjoined to it by a noble Patron, I have here complied with his Commands, with the best of my Knowledge and Judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Public Comments to State Water Control Board Adequacy of NWP 12 to Ensure Compliance with State Standards
    Summary of Public Comments to State Water Control Board Adequacy of NWP 12 to Ensure Compliance with State Standards Prepared by Wild Virginia Dominion Pipeline Monitoring Coalition (DPMC) August 15, 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary . 7 I. Overall Body of Comments and Organization of the Online Records . 10 II. Waterbodies Discussed . 12 Mountain Valley Pipeline New River Basin Kimballton Branch . 14 (tributary to Stony Creek) Stony Creek . 15 (aka Big Stony Creek - tributary to New River) Little Stony Creek . 15 (tributary to New River) Doe Creek . 16 (tributary to New River) Greenbriar Branch . 17 (tributary to Sinking Creek) Unnamed Tributary to Grass Run . 17 (tributary to Grass Run) Sinking Creek . 18 (tributary to New River) James River Basin Craig Creek . 19 (tributary to James River) Roanoke River Basin Bottom Creek, Mill Creek, and Tributaries . 20 (tributary to South Fork Roanoke River) South Fork Roanoke River . 22 (tributary to Roanoke River) Mill Creek (Montogomery Co.) . 23 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) Bottom Spring . 24 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) Salmon Spring . 24 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) 2 Bradshaw Creek . 25 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) Flatwoods Branch . 25 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) North Fork Roanoke River . 25 (tributary to Roanoke River) North Fork Blackwater River . 26 (tributary to Blackwater River) Green Creek . 27 (tributary to South Fork Blackwater River) Teels Creek . 27 (tributary to Little Creek) Little Creek . 28 (tributary to Blackwater River) Blackwater River . 28 (tributary to Roanoke River - Smith Mtn. Lake) Pigg River . 29 (tributary to Roanoke River - Leesville Lake) Roanoke River .
    [Show full text]
  • Dot 16550 DS1.Pdf
    DRAFT NOTES ON THE SEMINOLE TRAIL (U.S . 29) Ill VIRGIBU Howard Newloa, Jr. October 28, 1976 According to McCary the indians that inhabited Virginia prior to English settlement were linguistically Algonquian, 'Iroquoian and Siouan- The general areas are indicated on his map attached as Figure 1.") Harrison in his extensive work on Old Prince William which extended as far west as Fauquier County likewise describes the indians as Algonquian and Iroquois. Specific tribes associated with Piedmont Virginia are largeiy Sapoai, Hanahuac, Tutelo, and Occaneechi. No mention is made in any county or state histories consulted of habitation or travel in the Virginia area by Seminoles. Despite this, U.S. 29 between Warrenton and the Horth Carolina line in 1928 was designated "TIie Seminole Trail". This designation was apprwed as Senate Bill 64 on February 16, 1928, which stated 1. Be it enacted by the general assembly of Virginia that that part of the Virginia State highway system, beginning at the Borth Carolina line and leading through Danville , Chatham, Alta Vista, Lynchburg, Amherst, Lovingston, Charlottesville, Ruckersville, Nadison and Culpeper to Warrenton, be, and is hereby designated and shall. be, here- after , known as the "Seminole Trail.". No supporting arguments were found in the Senate Journal or other public documents in the University of Virginia Library. Like- wise no documentation or descriptions were found in tourist oriented publications. Thus a question remains as to the origin and validity of the designation. Attempts to find supporting evidence in published sources on American Indians were likewise unsuccessful. The mo8t extensive -1- documentation of Southeastern indian trails was published by Myer in 1928!3) His map is attached as Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Trail Inventory
    West Virginia Trail Inventory Trail report summarized by county, prepared by the West Virginia GIS Technical Center updated 9/24/2014 County Name Trail Name Management Area Managing Organization Length Source (mi.) Date Barbour American Discovery American Discovery Trail 33.7 2009 Trail Society Barbour Brickhouse Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.55 2013 Barbour Brickhouse Spur Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 2.73 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Shortcut Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.46 2013 Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.02 2013 Connector Barbour Double Dip Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.2 2013 Barbour Hospital Loop Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.29 2013 Barbour Indian Burial Ground Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Kid's Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.4 2011 Resources Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.07 2011 Access Resources Barbour Prologue Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.63 2013 Barbour River Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.26 2013 Barbour Rock Cliff Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.21 2011 Resources Barbour Rock Pinch Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.51 2013 Barbour Short course Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.1 2013 Barbour
    [Show full text]