History of the Potomac Highlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of the Potomac Highlands PPartart 11:: HHistoryistory ooff tthehe PPotomacotomac HHighlandsighlands BBYY BBETHETH SSEEEE IINTRODUCTIONNTRODUCTION OOFF HHIGHLANDIGHLAND HHISTORYISTORY “The mountains are calling and I must go.” - John Muir The land that makes up the Potomac Highlands of West Virginia encompassing the Allegheny Mountains and the Monongahela National Forest is all about extensive mountain views, raging water falls, winding, scenic roads and the wonders they bring. Charming mountain towns offer art galleries, historic museums, music, good food and lodging. The mountains and waters were vital for those first settlers as they made their homes and forged out a living. Today, they provide a great escape from a busy world. Many locals and tourists reap the joy and sustenance provided by the rivers and mountains as they revel in the abundant beauty of this part of West Virginia. The Potomac Highlands - bordering Maryland and Virginia - is a unique region with a distinct personality formed by a mixture of exuberance and practicality. First settled by Native Americans, it was primarily used as hunting grounds with some areas used for agricultural purposes. Later, it was inherited by the Tuscarora who migrated northward to New York and in 1712 became the sixth nation to formally be admitted to the Iroquois Confederacy. Following the French and Indian War, King George III feared more tension between Native Americans and settlers and issued the Proclamation of 1763 which prohibited settlement west of the Allegheny Mountains. Much of the Potomac Highlands is used for hunting and farming today. There were originally five counties of the Potomac Highlands: Grant, Hampshire, Hardy, Mineral, and Pendleton. These counties are in the upper Potomac River watershed and the mountainous uplands of the Eastern Panhandle and drained by the Potomac headwaters. Because of geographical proximity, topography, landscapes, culture 1 kluhiluilnnnand history, Pocahontas, Randolph, and Tucker counties are also part of the Potomac Highlands. The western edges of Grant and Mineral counties lie west of the Allegheny Front and are a part of the Allegheny Mountains. All the otherterritory is east of the Allegheny Front and a part of the Ridge and Valley system. This Potomac Highlands region of 2,722 square miles has many of the state’s most spectacular features. See Appendix A1: Places to Visit, pg A1 WWESTEST VVIRGINIAIRGINIA CCOUNTIESOUNTIES OOFF TTHEHE PPOTOMACOTOMAC HHIGHLANDSIGHLANDS 2 County Named For Founded County Seat Grant Ulysses Simpson February 14, 1866 Petersburg Grant Hampshire Hampshire County, December 13, 1753 Romney England Hardy Samuel Hardy December 10, 1785 Moorefield Mineral Minerals located in the February 1, 1866Keyser county Pendleton Edmund Pendleton December 4, 1787 Franklin Pocahontas Pocahontas of the 1821 Marlinton Powhatan Native American people Randolph Edmund Jennings 1787 Elkins Randolph Tucker Henry St. George 1856 Parsons Tucker, Sr. The eight county region in the Potomac Highlands Virginia has a population of approximately 117,000 with Hampshire County the oldest. The Highland people today are mostly rural nonfarm residents, with Elkins in Randolph County and Keyser in Mineral County the largest urban places in the region. Agriculture (especially poultry and livestock), tourism, forestry products, and manufacturing are the primary economic pursuits in the Potomac Highlands. In the late nineteenth century, this highland region was the scene of timbering, farming and mining industries and immigrants from at least 18 different countries settled in this part of the state to obtain work. With these immigrants came a culture and lifestyle that still carries on today (see Section 2, Ethnic Groups of the Highlands). Some groups made a stronger impact than others depending on the industry and the number of people involved. Lumber camps was an industry responsible for creating diverse communities in the early history of this region, with many Polish working in the camps. 2 Image Credit: Chance Hanna, https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/29236bd81edc42378eedf92e3286979c TTHEHE HHIGHLANDIGHLAND CCOUNTIESOUNTIES ((ININ AALPHABETICALLPHABETICAL OORDER)RDER) GRANT COUNTY Grant County, created from the western part of Hardy County in 1866, was named for Civil War General and the 18th president of the United States, Ulysses S. Grant. However, the history of the region dates back farther than that. Prior to becoming an official county, the area drew settlers because of its fertile land along the Potomac River’s south branch. The many streams that spread from the River made an excellent area for farming. Surrounding these valley regions were virgin forests, which soon Image Credit: transformed into a logging industry. https://www.familysearch.org/ Petersburg, the county seat, was first settled by German immigrants around 1745, making it one of the first settlements in the South Branch Valley, at a time when most 3 of what is now West Virginia was still a virgin wilderness. The city was named for Jacob Peterson, who owned and operated the first general merchandising store in the community. As word of the resources in the area spread, so did the population. Petersburg, WV The peril of Indian raids was severe Imgae Credit: is http://www.historicpublishing.org enough that George Washington and others planned a string of forts along the fringes of the settlements to which settlers could retreat for protection. Forts George and Mulligan were erected near Petersburg, Fort Peterson was built near North Mill Creek, and Fort Shobe was located near the junction of North and South Mill Creek. Union Colonel James A. Mulligan, from Illinois, along with his 23rd Illinois troops and more from Ohio, Pennsylvania and western Virginia, built in 1863 Fort Mulligan which overlooks Petersburg. The fort is still regarded as one of the best preserved fortifications in West Virginia. The logging industry continued to push the economy of Grant County through the 1900s. While the economy has diversified, today the area is known for its abundant natural resources. HAMPSHIRE COUTNY Hampshire County is steeped in English history. When Lord Fairfax, who owned a Royal Grant to the area, came upon some very large hogs and inquired where they had been raised, he was told they were from the South Branch of the Potomac Valley (now Hampshire County). He was so impressed with these hogs that he said that when a county was formed west of Frederick, he would name it after Hampshire County, England, famous for its Image Credit: very fat hogs. https://www.familysearch.org/ During the 1700s, Lord Fairfax sent a surveying party, including 16 year old George Washington, to survey his lands along the Potomac and South Branch rivers. Washington spent three summers and falls surveying Lord Fairfax’s estate, including present day Hampshire County. George W. Washington, a descendent of a brother of President George Washington, built a 19th-century Greek Revival plantation house, George W. Washington’s house “Ridgedale” Ridgedale, outside of Romney overlooking the Image credit: http://www.historichampshire.org South Branch River. 4 In 1762, Lord Fairfax had a survey to lay out Pearsell’s Flats into 100 half-acre lots. He renamed the town Romney in honor of a port city on the English Channel. The Virginia General Assembly recognized the town’s formation on December 23, 1762. As settlers continued to enter the county, Virginia decided to build a state road from Winchester to Romney along present day Route 50. This road was a boon to economic development as stage lines began operations, providing settlers more access to eastern markets. By 1786, a state road had been completed from Winchester to Romney. The Northwestern Turnpike was constructed in the mid-1830s, connecting Winchester to Clarksburg via Romney, and eventually on to Parkersburg on the Ohio River. As the frontier of the new nation moved westward, more roads were required to serve the expanding nation. The opening of the Northwestern Turnpike, a toll road connecting Winchester, Romney and Moorefield to further west was a major event in Hampshire County. By 1845, daily stage and mail service was established between Winchester and Parkersburg. Romney was a popular rest stop along the Turnpike, and a number of inns and taverns were built to accommodate travelers passing through the area. Romney changed hands at least 56 times during the war, placing second behind Winchester in changing hands the most during the Civil War. On June 11, 1861, Romney changed hands twice the same day. Some historians speculate that Romney actually changed hands more times than Winchester. In the late 1860s, Professor Howard H. Johnson of Franklin, Virginia (now Pendleton County, West Virginia), a blind teacher, was instrumental in bringing a school for the deaf and blind to Romney. In 1870, the West Virginia State Legislature appropriated $8,000 for the creation of the school. Many towns lobbied for the school’s location, but Romney was chosen when it offered the buildings and grounds of the Romney Literary Society. The school opened on September 29, 1870. Shepherdstown (then known as Mecklenburg) and Romney were chartered by the Virginia General Assembly on December 23, 1762. Romney claims it is older because its incorporation was listed before Shepherdstown in the Virginia Statutes at Large and its earliest settlers arrived in 1725 while Shepherdstown’s earliest settlers did not arrive until 1727. HARDY COUNTY Hardy County was formed from the southern portion of Hampshire County, Virginia in 1786. It was named after Samuel Hardy, who had served as a member of the Virginia House of Delegates, as the Lieutenant Governor in 1782, and as a delegate to the Continental Congress. There are two incorporated towns Imgage Credit: westvirginiahometownlocator.com 5 in the county, Moorefield and Wardensville. Moorefield, in the South Branch Valley, was formed in 1777 and named for Conrad Moore. It is the county seat. Among the earliest known inhabitants were Shawnee, who cleared land north of Moorefield in the “Indian Old Fields”, now referred to as “Old Fields”.
Recommended publications
  • 02070001 South Branch Potomac 01605500 South Branch Potomac River at Franklin, WV 01606000 N F South Br Potomac R at Cabins, WV 01606500 So
    Appendix D Active Stream Flow Gauging Stations In West Virginia Active Stream Flow Gauging Stations In West Virginia 02070001 South Branch Potomac 01605500 South Branch Potomac River At Franklin, WV 01606000 N F South Br Potomac R At Cabins, WV 01606500 So. Branch Potomac River Nr Petersburg, WV 01606900 South Mill Creek Near Mozer, WV 01607300 Brushy Fork Near Sugar Grove, WV 01607500 So Fk So Br Potomac R At Brandywine, WV 01608000 So Fk South Branch Potomac R Nr Moorefield, WV 01608070 South Branch Potomac River Near Moorefield, WV 01608500 South Branch Potomac River Near Springfield, WV 02070002 North Branch Potomac 01595200 Stony River Near Mount Storm,WV 01595800 North Branch Potomac River At Barnum, WV 01598500 North Branch Potomac River At Luke, Md 01600000 North Branch Potomac River At Pinto, Md 01604500 Patterson Creek Near Headsville, WV 01605002 Painter Run Near Fort Ashby, WV 02070003 Cacapon-Town 01610400 Waites Run Near Wardensville, WV 01611500 Cacapon River Near Great Cacapon, WV 02070004 Conococheague-Opequon 01613020 Unnamed Trib To Warm Spr Run Nr Berkeley Spr, WV 01614000 Back Creek Near Jones Springs, WV 01616500 Opequon Creek Near Martinsburg, WV 02070007 Shenandoah 01636500 Shenandoah River At Millville, WV 05020001 Tygart Valley 03050000 Tygart Valley River Near Dailey, WV 03050500 Tygart Valley River Near Elkins, WV 03051000 Tygart Valley River At Belington, WV 03052000 Middle Fork River At Audra, WV 03052450 Buckhannon R At Buckhannon, WV 03052500 Sand Run Near Buckhannon, WV 03053500 Buckhannon River At Hall, WV 03054500 Tygart Valley River At Philippi, WV Page D 1 of D 5 Active Stream Flow Gauging Stations In West Virginia 03055500 Tygart Lake Nr Grafton, WV 03056000 Tygart Valley R At Tygart Dam Nr Grafton, WV 03056250 Three Fork Creek Nr Grafton, WV 03057000 Tygart Valley River At Colfax, WV 05020002 West Fork 03057300 West Fork River At Walkersville, WV 03057900 Stonewall Jackson Lake Near Weston, WV 03058000 West Fork R Bl Stonewall Jackson Dam Nr Weston 03058020 West Fork River At Weston, WV 03058500 W.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 Markings Colonial -1865, Which, While Not Comprehen- Sive, Has the Advantage of Including Postal Markings As by Len Mcmaster Well As Early Postmasters6
    38 Whole Number 242 Hampshire County West Virginia Post Offices Part 2 Markings Colonial -1865, which, while not comprehen- sive, has the advantage of including postal markings as By Len McMaster well as early postmasters6. Previously I discussed a little of the history of Hamp- Thus I have attempted to identify the approximate shire County, described the source of the data and the location and dates of operation of the post offices es- conventions used in the listings, and began the listing of tablished in Hampshire County, explaining, where pos- the post offices from Augusta through Green Valley sible, the discrepancies or possible confusion that ex- Depot. The introduction is repeated here. ists in the other listings. Because of the length of the material, it has been broken up into three parts. This Introduction part will include the balance of the Hampshire county Several people have previously cataloged the Hamp- post office descriptions starting with Hainesville, and shire County West Virginia post offices, generally as the third part will include descriptions of the post of- part of a larger effort to list all the post offices of West fices in Mineral County today that were established in Virginia. Examples include Helbock’s United States Post Hampshire County before Mineral County was split off, Offices1 and Small’s The Post Offices of West Vir- and tables of all the post offices established in Hamp- ginia, 1792-19772. Confusing this study is that Hamp- shire County. shire County was initially split off from Virginia with Individual Post Office Location the establishment of many early post offices appearing in studies of Virginia post offices such as Abelson’s and History of Name Changes 3 Virginia Postmasters and Post Offices, 1789-1832 Hainesville (Haines Store) and Hall’s “Virginia Post Offices, 1798-1859”4; and that Hampshire County was itself eventually split into all or Hainesville was located near the crossroads of Old parts of five West Virginia counties, including its present Martinsburg Road (County Route 45/9) and Kedron day boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cacapon Settlement: 1749-1800 31
    THE CACAPON SETTLEMENT: 1749-1800 31 THE CACAPON SETTLEMENT: 1749-1800 31 5 THE CACAPON SETTLEMENT: 1749-1800 The existence of a settlement of Brethren families in the Cacapon River Valley of eastern Hampshire County in present day West Virginia has been unknown and uninvestigated until the present time. That a congregation of Brethren existed there in colonial times cannot now be denied, for sufficient evidence has been accumulated to reveal its presence at least by the 1760s and perhaps earlier. Because at this early date, Brethren churches and ministers did not keep records, details of this church cannot be recovered. At most, contemporary researchers can attempt to identify the families which have the highest probability of being of Brethren affiliation. Even this is difficult due to lack of time and resources. The research program for many of these families is incomplete, and this chapter is offered tentatively as a basis for additional research. Some attempted identifications will likely be incorrect. As work went forward on the Brethren settlements in the western and southern parts of old Hampshire County, it became clear that many families in the South Branch, Beaver Run and Pine churches had relatives who had lived in the Cacapon River Valley. Numerous families had moved from that valley to the western part of the county, and intermarriages were also evident. Land records revealed a large number of family names which were common on the South Branch, Patterson Creek, Beaver Run and Mill Creek areas. In many instances, the names appeared first on the Cacapon and later in the western part of the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland's 2016 Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards
    Maryland’s 2016 Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards EPA Approval Date: July 11, 2018 Table of Contents Overview of the 2016 Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards ............................................ 3 Nationally Recommended Water Quality Criteria Considered with Maryland’s 2016 Triennial Review ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Re-evaluation of Maryland’s Restoration Variances ...................................................................... 5 Other Future Water Quality Standards Work ................................................................................. 6 Water Quality Standards Amendments ........................................................................................... 8 Designated Uses ........................................................................................................................... 8 Criteria ....................................................................................................................................... 19 Antidegradation.......................................................................................................................... 24 2 Overview of the 2016 Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards The Clean Water Act (CWA) requires that States review their water quality standards every three years (Triennial Review) and revise the standards as necessary. A water quality standard consists of three separate but related
    [Show full text]
  • Area Information
    AREA INFORMATION The area is known as the Potomac Highlands. The Allegheny Mountains run right through the region which is the highest watershed for the Potomac River, the largest river feeding into the Chesapeake Bay. The region is renowned for amazing views, high elevation blueberry and spruce stands, dense rhododendron thickets, hundreds of Brook Trout streams, and miles of backcountry trails. Much of the Potomac Highlands is within the one million acre Monongahela National Forest which features National Wilderness areas like Otter Creek, Dolly Sods, Cranberry Glades, Roaring Plains West, and Laurel Fork North. The region is ideal for hiking, rock climbing, skiing, kayaking, canoeing, fishing, and hunting which are all popular activities in the area. The Shavers Fork is a stocked trout stream and maintained by WV Division of Natural Resources, as are many other rivers in the area. Wonderful skiing can be experienced at Timberline, Canaan Valley, Whitegrass Nordic Center Ski areas and Snowshoe Mountain Resort, which are all less than 40 miles from our door. State Parks and forests in the area include Blackwater Falls, Canaan Valley, Audra, Kumbrabow, Seneca, and Cathedral. Federal Recreation areas include Spruce Knob & Seneca Rocks management area, Smoke Hole Canyon, Stuarts Recreation Area, Gaudineer Knob, and Spruce Knob Lake. The region is within 5 hours of half of the nation’s population yet offers a mountain playground second to none. Elkins deserves its high ranking in America's Best Small Art Towns. Elkins is home to Davis and Elkins College and the Augusta Heritage Arts Center, The Mountain State Forest Festival and our thriving Randolph County Community Arts Center (www.randolpharts.org).
    [Show full text]
  • WV Hunting & Trapping Regulations
    WEST VIRGINIA A N HUNTING D TRAPPING Regulations Summary JULY 2019 ‒ JUNE 2020 wvdnr.gov From the Director Access to viable hunting areas and land has long been identified in nationwide surveys as a limitation for those people wanting to hunt. While West Virginia has been blessed with approximately one million acres of National Forest land and another 500,000 acres of state-owned or managed land, one region of the State has had limited public land available to outdoor enthusiasts—until now! Over the past year, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources officials have partnered with The Conservation Fund to acquire 31,218 acres of public land in the west-central region of the state. These efforts have resulted in the creation of seven new wildlife management areas (WMAs), as well as expansion of three other WMAs. The new properties are in Calhoun, Doddridge, Jackson, Pleasants, Ritchie, Wirt and Wood counties. Funds from various sources were used in this land acquisition project, including hunting license monies, Wildlife Restoration Program federal funds, as well as contributions from various pipeline development companies and non-governmental organizations. I would like to thank Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc., and TC Energy for their monetary donations. The contributions are a result of an agreement between the pipeline development companies and the DNR to provide conservation measures for forest-dependent wildlife and their associated habitats affected as a result of development of natural pipeline projects. Our staff will manage these new lands to enhance essential wildlife habitat for a variety of forestland species.
    [Show full text]
  • New River Crayfish Range Wide Status Assessment
    New River Crayfish Range Wide Status Assessment William T. Russ, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, Division of Inland Fisheries, 645 Fish Hatchery Road, Marion, NC 28752 Zach J. Loughman, West Liberty University, Department of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Campus Service Center Box 139, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV 26074 Roger F. Thoma, Midwest Biodiversity Institute, Inc., 4673 Northwest Parkway, Hilliard, OH 43026 Brian T. Watson, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, 1132 Thomas Jefferson Road, Forest, VA 24551 Todd D. Ewing, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, Division of Inland Fisheries, 1721 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 Abstract: The New River crayfish, (Cambarus chasmodactylus), was described in 1966 from the East Fork of the Greenbrier River, West Virginia, and historically occurred throughout the New River Basin from the Greenbrier River sub-basin in West Virginia, upstream through Virginia, and into the headwaters of the South Fork New River in North Carolina. The New River crayfish was part of a federal listing species petition in 2010 and it is cur- rently being evaluated for listing as either threatened or endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act. In order to understand the current distribution and status of this species, a range-wide assessment was undertaken by various organizations and agencies in West Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina. Biological information was summarized, including species description, habitat use, life history, and current distribution. All historical and recent collections were compared and spatially displayed using GIS software. The New River crayfish was collected in three 8-digit hydrologic unit codes (HUCs) and 14 counties in three states, with the majority of occurrences in the Upper New and Greenbrier River sub-basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Crayfishes of the Cheat River Watershed in West Virginia and Pennsylvania
    CRAYFISHES OF THE CHEAT RIVER WATERSHED IN WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA. PART II. OBSERVATIONS UPON ECOLOGICAL FACTORS RELATING TO DISTRIBUTION1 FRANK J. SCHWARTZ AND WILLIAM G. MEREDITH Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, Maryland and Ml. St. Mary's College, Emmittsburg, Maryland Schwartz and Meredith (1960) presented as Part I the localities and species of crayfishes (Decapoda) currently found throughout the Cheat River watershed of West Virginia and Pennsylvania. These records indicated that two species, Cambarus bartoni and Orconectes obscurus, now occupy the Cheat system. Litera- ture records occur for Cambarus bartoni carinirostris (Faxon, 1914; Ortmann, 1931) and Cambarus carolinus (Ortmann, 1931) in addition to the forms mentioned. Bick et al. (1953) have reviewed the meager literature relating to the ecology of acid mine streams. Bowden (1961) has called attention to the effects of strip mines on faunal ecologies. The former have also shown the detrimental effects to the fauna and ecology of a Louisiana acid stream after it was altered by channel dredging. A casual scanning of the data will reveal peculiarities in the distributions of the present species. C. bartoni, although taken at 138 stations of the 233 sampled (fig. 1), is absent today from the central portion and a number of the tributaries of the Cheat system. The greatest number of collections was made in the head- waters of the system. 0. obscurus (fig. 2) occurs in only a few of the lower elevation streams, and was absent from the headwaters and central zone of the watershed. C. b. carinirostris (fig. 1), a species once described from the Cheat system and whose center of abundance was believed to be in the Cheat system streams of Randolph, Tucker, and Pocahontas counties (Faxon, 1914), was not found during the present study.
    [Show full text]
  • GAULEY RIVER Ifjj
    D-1 IN final wild and scenic river study ~ORA GE ' auoust 1983 GAULEY RIVER ifjJ WEST VIRGINIA PLEASE RETURN TO: TECHNICAL ltfFORMATION CENTER DENVER SERVICE CE'NTER NATIONAL PARK SERVICE UNITED S'm.TES DEPARIMENT CF 'lHE INI'ERIOR/NATICNAL PARK SERVICE As the Nation's principal conservation a· gency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environ­ mental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through out­ door recreation. The Oepartmer:t assesses our energy and min· eral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories un­ der U. S. administration. FINl\L REPORT GAULEY RIVER WILD AND SCENIC RIVER S'IUDY WEST VIRGINIA August 1983 Prepared by: Mid-Atlantic Regional Office National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior ,. OONTENTS I. SUMMAm' OF FINDINGS / 1 I I • CDNDUCT' OF 'llIE S'IUDY I 6 Purpose I 6 Background I 6 Study Approach I 6 Public Involvement I 7 Significant Issues / 8 Definitions of Terms Used in Report I 9 III. EVAWATION I 10 Eligibility I 10 Classification I 12 Suitcbility / 15 IV. THE RIVER ENVIOONMENT I 18 Natural Resources / 18 Cultural Resources / 29 Existing Public Use / 34 Status of Land OWnership arrl Use / 39 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Mon River Trail
    Upper Monongahela River Water Trail Map and Guide Water trails are recreational waterways on a lake, river, or ocean between specific locations, containing access points and day-use and/or camping sites for the boating public. Water trails emphasize low-impact use and promote stewardship of the resources. Explore this unique West Virginia and Pennsylvania water trail. For your safety and enjoyment: Always wear a life jacket. Obtain proper instruction in boating skills. Know fishing and boating regulations. Be prepared for river hazards. Carry proper equipment. THE MONONGAHELA RIVER The Monongahela River, locally know as “the Mon,” forms at the confluence of the Tygart and West Fork Rivers in Fairmont West Virginia. It flows north 129 miles to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where it joins the Allegheny River to form the Ohio River. The upper section, which is described in this brochure, extends 68 miles from Fairmont to Maxwell Lock and Dam in Pennsylvania. The Monongahela River formed some 20 million years ago. When pioneers first saw the Mon, there were many places where they could walk across it. The Native American named the river “Monongahela,” which is said to mean “river with crumbling or falling banks.” The Mon is a hard-working river. It moves a large amount of water, sediment, and freight. The average flow at Point Marion is 4,300 cubic feet per second. The elevation on the Upper Mon ranges from 891 feet in Fairmont to 763 feet in the Maxwell Pool. PLANNING A TRIP Trips on the Mon may be solitary and silent, or they may provide encounters with motor boats and water skiers or towboats moving barges of coal or limestone.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Trail Inventory
    West Virginia Trail Inventory Trail report summarized by county, prepared by the West Virginia GIS Technical Center updated 9/24/2014 County Name Trail Name Management Area Managing Organization Length Source (mi.) Date Barbour American Discovery American Discovery Trail 33.7 2009 Trail Society Barbour Brickhouse Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.55 2013 Barbour Brickhouse Spur Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 2.73 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Shortcut Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.46 2013 Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.02 2013 Connector Barbour Double Dip Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.2 2013 Barbour Hospital Loop Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.29 2013 Barbour Indian Burial Ground Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Kid's Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.4 2011 Resources Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.07 2011 Access Resources Barbour Prologue Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.63 2013 Barbour River Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.26 2013 Barbour Rock Cliff Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.21 2011 Resources Barbour Rock Pinch Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.51 2013 Barbour Short course Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.1 2013 Barbour
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Assistance to States Jennings Randolph Lake Scoping Study Phase II Report
    ~ ~ U. S. Army Corps Interstate Commission of Engineers on the Potomac River Basin Planning Assistance to States Jennings Randolph Lake Scoping Study Phase II Report APRIL 2020 Prepared by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District Laura Felter and Julia Fritz and Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Cherie Schultz, Claire Buchanan, and Gordon Michael Selckmann Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Study Authority ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Congressional Authorizations and Project Objectives .................................................................. 3 1.4 Study Area Management .............................................................................................................. 4 2 Scoping Studies ..................................................................................................................................... 7 3 Watershed Conditions Analysis ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]