DOCSLIB.ORG

Claim of Right for Scotland on Tuesday 6 September 2016 at Material 4 2.30Pm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Claim of Right for Scotland on Tuesday 6 September 2016 at Material 4 2.30Pm DEBATE PACK Number 2016-0158, 2 September 2016 Claim of Right for By Sarah Priddy Scotland Contents 1. Background to the Summary 1989 Claim of Right 2 Debate Pack prepared ahead of the Westminster Hall debate initiated by Patrick 2. Parliamentary Grady on the Claim of Right for Scotland on Tuesday 6 September 2016 at material 4 2.30pm. 3. Press Articles 6 Subject Specialist: Paul Bowers 4. Further reading and useful links 9 Appendix - Signatories to the 1989 Claim of Right The House of Commons Library prepares a briefing in hard copy and/or online for most non-legislative debates in the Chamber and Westminster Hall other than half-hour debates. Debate Packs are produced quickly after the announcement of parliamentary business. They are intended to provide a summary or overview of the issue being debated and identify relevant briefings and useful documents, including press and parliamentary material. More detailed briefing can be prepared for Members on request to the Library. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Number 2016-0158, 2 September 2016 1. Background to the 1989 Claim of Right The following is taken from the Commons Library briefing on Citizens’ Assemblies and Constitutional Conventions. CBP 07143, 18 July 2016 1.1 Scottish Constitutional Convention 1989 The establishment of a constitutional convention had been a recommendation of the 1988 report, A Claim of Right for Scotland. The report recommended that a convention should be established to draw up a scheme for a Scottish Assembly or Parliament. In January 1989, a cross-party meeting was held to consider proposals for a convention. The constitutional convention for Scotland, which was grass roots led rather than established by Government, held its first meeting on 30 March 1989, with Canon Kenyon Wright as the Executive Chairman, and reaffirmed the Claim of Right. The Claim of Right stated that the will of the Scottish people was sovereign. Members of the Scottish Constitutional Convention included the Scottish Labour Party, the Scottish Liberal Democrats, the Scottish Democratic Left, the Orkney and Shetland Movement, the Scottish Green Party, the Scottish Trades Union Congress, Regional, District and Island Councils, and the Campaign for a Scottish Parliament. Membership also included the main Scottish Churches, the Federation of Small Businesses, ethnic minority representatives and the Scottish Women's Forum. At the initial cross party meeting on establishing a convention, the Scottish National Party had expressed their concern that the convention would not consider the issue of Scottish independence, and later withdrew. The Conservative Party had already made it clear that they would take no part in the proposed convention, as they were not in favour of a devolved Parliament for Scotland. As the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee noted in its report, Do we need a constitutional convention for the UK?, the Scottish Constitutional Convention’s report in 1995 formed the basis of proposals which were brought forward in a White Paper, Scotland’s Parliament, by the Government in 1997. Those proposals received considerable support in a referendum on 11 September 1997, with 74% of those voting favouring the Government's proposals for a Scottish Parliament. The Committee stated that: 23. The Scottish Constitutional Convention was highly successful in achieving its aim. The Convention had a clearly defined remit of making the case for an Assembly or Parliament for Scotland. Claim of Right for Scotland 3 Nonetheless, the example of the Scottish Constitutional Convention shows that there is a need for clarity about the questions that the convention would seek to answer. Although the Scottish Constitutional Convention did not initially have support from all the political parties, support for its proposals grew over the course of the Convention’s six years of deliberations. 1.2 Text of the1989 Claim of Right We, gathered as the Scottish Constitutional Convention, do hereby A copy of the 1989 acknowledge the sovereign right of the Scottish people to determine Claim of Right and the form of Government best suited to their needs, and do hereby signatories is added declare and pledge that in all our actions and deliberations their as an appendix at the interests shall be paramount. back of this document. We further declare and pledge that our actions and deliberations shall be directed to the following ends: To agree a scheme for an Assembly or Parliament for Scotland; To mobilise Scottish opinion and ensure the approval of the Scottish people for that scheme; and To assert the right of the Scottish people to secure implementation of that scheme. 4 Number 2016-0158, 2 September 2016 2. Parliamentary material 2.1 UK Parliament - Debates Westminster Hall debate on EU Exit: Devolved Governments HC Deb 21 July 2016 On the motion: That this House has considered devolved governments and negotiations on the UK leaving the EU. Westminster Hall debate on the renegotiation of EU Membership (Devolved Administrations) HC Deb 10 Nov 2015 cc 66-84 On the motion: That this House has considered the role of devolved administrations in UK renegotiation of EU membership 2.2 UK Parliament – Select Committee Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Do we need a constitutional convention for the UK? HC 371 2012-13 The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee conducted an inquiry into whether there is a need for a constitutional convention for the UK. The inquiry looked at how a convention might allow a debate on the future of the Union as a whole, rather than piecemeal through a focus on specific issues or nations. Written evidence submitted by Professor James Mitchell (CC 21) Professor James Mitchell is Head of the School of Government and Public Policy, University of Strathclyde. [Extract] 11. The Scottish Constitutional Convention (SCC) is often referred to in debates in the UK. The SCC was founded on a ‘Claim of Right’ which proved less certain than its founders hoped. [6] While participants signed up to the Claim, it was a political rather than justiciable claim to ‘sovereignty of the Scottish people’. The SCC was an important non-authoritative body for cross- and non-party deliberation on aspects of devolution. There was a conscious effort to ensure that in form and in substantive conclusions it would be an open, participatory form of decision-making. The Convention highlights both the strengths and limitations of open, participatory constitutionalism. 2.3 Scottish Parliament – written question Question on the Claim of Rights Act 1689 2 October 2014 (S4W-22401) Jean Urquhart (Highlands and Islands) (Independent): To ask the Scottish Government whether the provisions of the Claim of Rights Act 1689 in relation to the right to appeal to the monarch against perceived Claim of Right for Scotland 5 judicial injustice remain in force and, if not, what information it has on when these were revoked and for what reason. Kenny MacAskill: The provisions of the Claim of Right Act 1689 in relation to the right to appeal to the monarch against perceived judicial injustice remain in force to the extent that the right is now exercisable via appeal to the United Kingdom Supreme Court, in accordance with the usual rules of court, and civil procedure. The Claim of Right Act 1689 provided a right for a person to appeal a decision of the Court of Session to the Parliament of Scotland (the ‘monarch in Parliament’) and not necessarily directly to the sovereign as an individual. Following the Acts of Union and the abolition of the Scottish Parliament, this right was effectively transferred to the House of Lords, meaning that decisions of the Court of Session could be appealed to the House of Lords. In 2009 the appellate jurisdiction of the House of Lords was transferred to the new United Kingdom Supreme Court, including appeals from the Court of Session. The right contained in the 1689 Act has evolved into the right of appeal to the Supreme Court and is not a parallel right of appeal alongside the normal rules of civil procedure. The Scottish Government’s understanding is that the 1689 Act concerned proceedings of the Court of Session and does not entitle an individual to challenge a conviction or sentence of a Scottish criminal court by petitioning the sovereign or the government on Her Majesty’s behalf. The House of Lords never assumed appellate jurisdiction for criminal cases following the Union. The mechanism for challenging a conviction or sentence of a criminal court is by appeal in accordance with the normal rules of criminal procedure. An individual who remains dissatisfied with the outcome of that appeal can ask the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission to consider investigating whether a miscarriage of justice has occurred, which can in certain circumstances result in the case being referred back to the appeal court. 2.4 Scottish Parliament - Debate Debate on the Claim of Right 26 January 2012, c5805 Nicola Sturgeon: Presiding officer, the motion for this afternoon’s debate is deliberately simple. It states that “This Parliament acknowledges the sovereign right of the Scottish people to determine the form of Government best suited to their needs, and declares and pledges that in all its actions and deliberations their interests shall be paramount.” 6 Number 2016-0158, 2 September 2016 3. Press Articles Nicola Sturgeon launches new debate on Scottish independence New Statesman 2 September 2016 Replace House of Lords with elected senate, urges Gordon Brown Ex-PM says Brexit vote means UK should rethink constitutional structures to weaken case for Scottish independence The Guardian, Severin Carrell 29 August 2016 In a speech at the Edinburgh book festival, written in collaboration with Scottish Labour leaders and policy staff, Brown said Holyrood should be given powers currently controlled by the EU.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oxford DNB: January 2021
    Oxford DNB: January 2021 Welcome to the seventieth update of the Oxford DNB, which adds biographies of 241 individuals who died in the year 2017: 224 with their own entries and seventeen added to existing entries as 'co-subjects'. Of these new inclusions, the earliest born is the journalist Clare Hollingworth (1911-2017) and the latest born is the artist and photographer Khadija Saye (1992- 2017). Hollingworth is one of five centenarians included in this update, and Saye one of thirty-four new subjects born after the Second World War. The vast majority (169, or over 70%) were born in the 1920s and 1930s. Sixty-three of the new subjects who died in 2017 (or just over 26% of the cohort) are women. Twenty of the new subjects were themselves contributors to the dictionary. Forty-five of the new articles include portrait images. From January 2021, the Oxford DNB offers biographies of 64,071 men and women who have shaped the British past, contained in 61,745 articles. 11,870 biographies include a portrait image of the subject—researched in partnership with the National Portrait Gallery, London. As ever, we have a free selection of these new entries, together with a full list of the new biographies. Most public libraries across the UK subscribe to the Oxford DNB, which means you can access the complete dictionary for free via your local library. Libraries offer 'remote access' that enables you to log in at any time at home (or anywhere you have internet access). Elsewhere the Oxford DNB is available online in schools, colleges, universities, and other institutions worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Do We Need a Constitutional Convention for the UK?
    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Do we need a constitutional convention for the UK? Written Evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee and accepted by the Committee as evidence for the inquiry are included. Ordered to be published 14, 21 and 28 June, 10 and 12 July, 6 September, 15, 18 and 30 October and 8 and 29 November 2012 1 List of written evidence Page 1 Canon Kenyon Wright CBE (CC 01, 01A) 3, 6 2 Professor Matthew Flinders (CC 02) 11 3 Constitution Society (CC 03) 14 4 Dr Claire Sutherland (CC 04) 20 5 Dr Alan Renwick (CC 05) 21 6 Graham Pearce and Sarah Ayres (CC 06) 23 7 Michael Gordon and Brian Thompson (CC 07) 29 8 Unlock Democracy (CC 08) 35 9 Democratic Audit (CC 09) 44 10 Professor Iain McLean (CC 10) 53 11 Rt Hon Carwyn Jones AM, First Minister of Wales (CC 11) 57 12 Andrew RT Davies, Leader of the Opposition & Welsh Conservative Assembly Group, Assembly Member for South Wales Central (CC 12) 62 13 Leanne Wood AM, Leader of Plaid Cymru and South Wales Central Assembly Member (CC 13) 65 14 Kirsty Williams AM, Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats and Assembly Member for Brecon and Radnorshire (CC 14) 66 15 James Ware (CC 15) 70 16 Ruth Davidson MSP, Leader of the Scottish Conservatives (CC 16) 72 17 Professor James Mitchell (CC 21) 74 18 Law Society of Scotland (CC 17) 80 19 Sir Merrick Cockell, Chairman, Local Government Association (CC 18) 81 20 Esther A Roberton (CC 19) 83 21 SOLACE (CC 20) 86 22 Simon Cramp (CC 22) 89 23 Nicola Sturgeon MSP, Deputy First Minister, Scottish Parliament (CC 23) 90 24 Karen Ghose, Chief Executive, The Electoral Reform Society (CC 24) 92 25 Dr Robin Wilson (CC 25) 103 26 Nigel Smith, Director, Voxscot (CC 26) 105 27 Cabinet Office (CC 27) 106 28 Sir Edward Lister, Chief of Staff and Deputy Mayor for Policy and Planning (CC 28) 114 2 Written evidence submitted by Canon Kenyon Wright CBE (CC 01) SCOTLAND AND UK CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE “Our constitution is wearing out” Lord Hailsham 1.
    [Show full text]
  • After the Referendum Alan Renwick the CONSITTUTION SOCIETY AFTER the REFERENDUM OPTIONS for a CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION
    Report Options For a For Options Constitutional Convention After Referendum the After Alan Renwick Renwick Alan After the Referendum Alan Renwick THE CONSITTUTION SOCIETY AFTER THE REFERENDUM OPTIONS FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION Alan Renwick First published in Great Britain in 2014 by The Constitution Society Top Floor, 61 Petty France London SW1H 9EU www.consoc.org.uk © The Constitution Society ISBN: 978-0-9928904-0-7 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. AFTER THE REFERENDUM 3 Contents About the Author 5 Summary 6 Part 1: Constitution-Making: The Building Blocks 6 Part 2: Constitution-Making around the World 8 Part 3: How Should the Options be Judged? 9 Part 4: Designs for Constitution-Making in the UK 10 Acknowledgement 13 Introduction 14 Part 1: Constitution-Making: The Building Blocks 17 1.1 What are the Purposes of the 17 Constitution-Making Process? 1.2 Who is Represented? 19 1.3 What Basic Structures are Available? 21 1.4 Who can Influence the Constitution-Making 25 Body’s Deliberations? 1.5 What are the Constitution-Making Body’s 26 Operational Procedures? 1.6 What Happens to the Proposals that are Made? 27 4 AFTER THE REFERENDUM Part 2: Constitution-Making around the World 30 2.1 Expert
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Scotland's Future in Scotland's Hands
    Scotland’s Right to Choose Putting Scotland’s Future in Scotland’s Hands What if that other voice we all know so well responds by saying, 'We say no, and we are the state'? Well we say yes – and we are the people. Canon Kenyon Wright Putting Scotland’s Future in Scotland’s Hands Introduction by the First Minister of Scotland Nicola Sturgeon First Minister of Scotland The Scottish Government believes the best future for Scotland is to be an independent country in order to build a fairer, more prosperous society. It is a fundamental democratic principle that The Scottish Government is a strong advocate the decision on whether or not Scotland of the values of human dignity, freedom, becomes independent should rest with the democracy, equality, the rule of law, and people who live in Scotland. respect for human rights. There has been a significant and material We are therefore committed to an agreed, change in circumstances since the 2014 legal process which adheres to and celebrates referendum and therefore, in line with the those values, and which will be accepted as mandate received in the 2016 Holyrood legitimate in Scotland, the UK as a whole, and election, and reinforced in subsequent UK by the international community. general elections—most recently in December 2019—the Scottish Government believes Scotland is not a region questioning its place people in Scotland have the right to consider in a larger unitary state; we are a country in a their future once again. voluntary union of nations. Our friends in the rest of the UK will always be our closest allies The decision on whether a new referendum and neighbours but in line with the principle of should be held, and when, is for the Scottish self-determination, people in Scotland have the Parliament to make – not a Westminster right to determine whether the time has come government which has been rejected by the for a new, better relationship, in which we can people of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Kenyon Wright: India's Swaraj and the Scottish Parliament
    Swaraj and the Scottish Parliament Home / Issue 7 January 2018/ Parliament Liberation theology from India influenced the work of Canon Kenyon Wright in setting up the Scottish Parliament. At the first anniversary of his death, Alastair McIntosh explores the largely hidden internationalism behind grassroots Scottish politics in the 1990s. When Canon Kenyon Wright died a year ago, on 11 January 2017 at the age of 84, Nicola Sturgeon had been its political executive of the Scottish Constitutional Convention, his gift had been to build consensus, mapping out fresh openings of the way where others could see only tangled briars. Less we while a missionary in West Bengal. I learned of the importance of this while working closely with him twenty years ago. We were engaged in a process that we called People and Parliament, but I had already come to appreciate Kenyon while climate change was climbing up the agenda in the late 1980s and 1990s. He had chaired the Scottish Environmental Forum as preparation for the Rio Earth Summit in 1991. He had played a founding role in Eco-Congregation Scotland in 2001, a network that today exceeds 400 member churches. And although his American-published book, Cosmic Crisis and Creation: the Search for Meaning, did not appear until 2012, he had been a pioneer of ecotheology from at least as early as 1975. That year, at a conference in Tennessee, he had set out his hallmark theme. The In what follows, I want to map out some of the background to the politics of Scotland in the 1990s, culminating in Scot often miss the academic and the mainstream eye.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Constitutional Convention (1995) Scotland’S Parliament: Scotland’S Right (Edinburgh: Convention of Scottish Local Authorities)
    Scottish Constitutional Convention (1995) Scotland’s Parliament: Scotland’s Right (Edinburgh: Convention of Scottish Local Authorities) [note from Paul Cairney: this is a PDF of the copy/pasted text from the SCC’s no-longer- there webpage] Welcome to the new Home page of the Scottish Constitutional Convention. This site has been setup to co-incide with the launch of its new report to the Scottish People, the site has a feedback facility to enable you to send in your comments to us, also included are links to other relevant sites. http://www.almac.co.uk/business_park/scc/ Joint Chairs: Lord Ewing of Kirkford Rt. Hon. Sir David Steel MP Chair of Executive Committee: Canon Kenyon Wright SCOTTISH CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Formation of the Scottish Constitutional Convention The proposal to establish a Constitutional Convention came from a committee of prominent Scots who in July 1988 in their report "A Claim of Right for Scotland" recommended that a Convention should be established to draw up a scheme for a Scottish Assembly or Parliament. The Committee itself was created following the result of the 1987 General Election as they believed action had to be taken on the way Scotland was governed. The Committee met between January and June of 1988, chaired by Professor Sir Robert Grieve with a former senior Scottish Office civil servant Jim Ross as secretary. In January 1989 a cross party meeting was held to consider proposals for a Convention at which the Scottish National Party expressed their reservations concerning a Convention and later withdrew. The Conservative Party had already made it clear they would take no part in the proposed Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedures Committee
    PROCEDURES COMMITTEE Tuesday 27 November 2001 (Morning) Session 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2001. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Tuesday 27 November 2001 Col. CONSULTATIVE STEERING GROUP PRINCIPLES INQUIRY ............................................................................ 1017 STANDING ORDERS (PUBLIC BILLS) ....................................................................................................... 1074 MEMBERS’ BUSINESS........................................................................................................................... 1077 PARLIAMENT AND THE EXECUTIVE (PROTOCOLS) ..................................................................................... 1079 PRESIDING OFFICER AND DEPUTY PRESIDING OFFICERS (ELECTIONS) ........................................................ 1080 PROCEDURES COMMITTEE th 12 Meeting 2001, Session 1 CONVENER *Mr Murray Tosh (South of Scotland)
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation Between Party and Civil Society（2）
    Title Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation between party and civil society（2） Author(s) Shoji, Seita Citation 北大法学論集, 71(5), 307-365 Issue Date 2021-01-28 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80334 Type bulletin (article) File Information lawreview_71_5_10_Shoji.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP 研究ノート Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation between party and civil society（2） Seita Shoji Part 1 1 Chapter 1-Introduction The question of electoral system formation in the Scottish Parliament Literature Review on the electoral system formation of Scottish Parliament Territorial parties and their principles Case and methods Theories on electoral system change Modern Scottish politics research and ‘new politics’ 2 Chapter 2-UK and Scotland: The meaning of territory and demand for autonomy Devolution to Scotland and the request of autonomy On actors―Labour and the SCC The Additional Member System (AMS) 3 Chapter 3 -Consensus building for the establishment of the Scottish Parliament and Labour (1989-1990) Establishment of the SCC and its operation Addressing Home Rule and acceptance of proportional representation （Ⅰ） 北法71（5・307）1269 Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation between party and civil society（2） Part 2 Chapter 4- Constitutional Commission and implementation of AMS (1991-1995) The advancement of the Scottish Constitutional Commission The acceptance and final construction of the completed report Chapter 5 Discussion: Logics of political parties in territory and cooperation Cooperation between Labour and the SCC: logic of autonomy Labour’s inherent logic: logic of union Chapter 6 Conclusion （Ⅱ） A brief comment should also be mentioned with regards to this article (Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995 Cooperation between party and civil society (2)) as part two of further articles which will be in previous volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Convention's Campaign
    Scottish Government Yearbook 1992 Scottish Government Yearbook 1992 Labour Party's Shadow Chancellor, Malcolm Bruce, Leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats, Norman Shanks, Convener of the Church of Scotland's CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION'S CAMPAIGN Church and Nation Committee, Jean McFadden, President of the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, Campbell Christie, General Secretary of the STUC and Isobel Lindsay, Convener of the Campaign for a Scottish Harry Conroy Assembly. The St Andrew's Day event was also seen as the start of the second phase By mid summer 1990, the Scottish Constitutional Convention was nearing of the Convention's work and 100,000 copies of an eight page tabloid completion of the first task set for it by the "Claim of Right for Scotland" newspaper "Scotland's Voice" were produced to both publicise the proposals document which was to "draw up a scheme for a Scottish Assembly." and inform the public. The Convention members then began to look ahead to the next stage A leaflet summarising the main Convention proposals was also published outlined in the "Claim of Right" which was to "mobilise Scottish opinion by the Campaign office which carried for the first time the "Scotland's behind that scheme." Parliament- We Say Yes" logo designed to identify the Campaign. To help achieve this objective the Campaign for a Scottish Assembly The publicity material was an integral part of the Campaign strategy received funding from the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust to pay for a which was agreed by the Convention's Executive in the run-up to the St Campaign Director for the Convention until the next General Election.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation Between Party and Civil Society (1)
    Title Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation between party and civil society (1) Author(s) Shoji, Seita Citation 北大法学論集, 71(4), 127-184 Issue Date 2020-11-27 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/79809 Type bulletin (article) File Information lawreview_71_4_06_Shoji.pdf () Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP 研究ノート Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation between party and civil society（1） Seita Shoji Part 1 1 Chapter 1-Introduction The question of electoral system formation in the Scottish Parliament Literature Review on the electoral system formation of the Scottish Parliament Territorial parties and their principles Case and methods Theories on electoral system change Modern Scottish politics research and ‘new politics’ 2 Chapter 2-UK and Scotland: The meaning of territory and demand for autonomy Devolution to Scotland and the request of autonomy On actors―Labour and the SCC The Additional Member System (AMS) 3 Chapter 3 -Consensus building for the establishment of the Scottish Parliament and Labour (1989-1990) Establishment of the SCC and its operation Addressing Home Rule and acceptance of proportional representation （Ⅰ） 北法71（4・127）759 Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation between party and civil society（1） Part 2 Chapter 4- Constitutional Commission and implementation of AMS (1991-1995) The advancement of the Scottish Constitutional Commission The acceptance and final construction of the completed report Chapter 5 Discussion: Logics of political parties in territory and cooperation Cooperation between Labour and the SCC: logic of autonomy Labour’s inherent logic: logic of union Chapter 6 Conclusion （Ⅱ） A brief comment should also be mentioned with regards to this article (Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995 Cooperation between party and civil society (1)) as part one of further articles which will be in subsequent volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultative Steering Group
    CONSULTATIVE STEERING GROUP REFLECTIONS ON 20 YEARS OF THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT October 2019 FOREWORD In November 1997, the then Secretary of State for Scotland asked us to create a blueprint for the Scottish Parliament that was to be established in 1999. Our remit was: To bring together views on and consider the operational needs and working methods of the Scottish Parliament To develop proposals for the rules of procedure and Standing Orders which the Parliament might be invited to adopt To prepare a report to the Secretary of State by the end of 1998, to inform the preparation of Standing Orders Our report, Shaping Scotland’s Parliament, was published a little over a year later and, as well as providing the new Parliament with founding principles to guide its operations, it formed the basis of the procedures and practices that have been followed by the Parliament in its first 20 years. We were delighted to be asked by the current Presiding Officer, the Right Hon. Ken Macintosh MSP, to consider our report in light of the experiences of the Parliament over the intervening years. We have all been involved, either directly or indirectly, in the Parliament’s growth and development over those two decades and have seen it evolve into a central and permanent part of Scottish life. We are pleased, therefore, to offer our reflections on how the Parliament has lived up to our aspirations for what Donald Dewar called back then this “new voice in the land”. Before doing so, however, we wish to acknowledge the massive part played – not only in the work of the Consultative Steering Group but in their contributions on a number of fronts over many decades – by two of our members who are no longer with us: Dr Campbell Christie CBE and Canon Kenyon Wright.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributors to Time for Reflection Session 1
    CONTRIBUTORS TO TIME FOR Scottish REFLECTION: Parliament SESSION 1 Fact sheet This fact sheet provides a list of contributors to Time for Reflection in the Scottish Parliament during Session 1. It is arranged by date, with Parliamentary the most recent date and Official Report reference appearing first. It Business: Historical also includes the name and religious affiliation of the contributor, and Series additional information about the contributor. The first Time for Reflection took place on 27 October 1999. 10 August 2009 Time for Reflection is normally the first item of business at a meeting of the Parliament each week on Wednesday. A speaker addresses the meeting for up to 4 minutes. Invitations to address the Parliament at Time for Reflection are issued by the Presiding Officer on advice from the Parliamentary Bureau. The pattern of speakers reflects the balance of beliefs in Scotland (based on the Census). In general, nominations for contributors are proposed to the Presiding Officer by MSPs or by the religions or faiths directly. There have been occasions when individuals have written to the Presiding Officer with nominations for contributors. 1 Date Contributor Religion/Faith/Belief Comments SP OR 26 March Reverend Samuel Church of Scotland Ettrick and Yarrow 2003 Široký Parish SP OR 19 March Reverend William Roman Catholic Vice-Rector of Scotus 2003 McFadden College, Glasgow SP OR 12 March Reverend Donald Reid Episcopalian Director of the 2003 Scottish Civic Forum. Diocese of Glasgow and Galloway SP OR 05 March Proceedings started 2003 late because of a power cut. The Presiding Officer apologised on behalf of Father Boles who had to attend another engagement.
    [Show full text]