DOCSLIB.ORG

CORRECTED TRANSCRIPT of ORAL EVIDENCE to Be Published As HC 371-V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CORRECTED TRANSCRIPT of ORAL EVIDENCE to Be Published As HC 371-V CORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 371-v HOUSE OF COMMONS ORAL EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE POLITICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM COMMITTEE DO WE NEED A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE UK? THURSDAY 18 OCTOBER 2012 LORD MACLENNAN OF ROGART and CANON KENYON WRIGHT Evidence heard in Public Questions 296 - 343 USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT 1. This is a corrected transcript of evidence taken in public and reported to the House. The transcript has been placed on the internet on the authority of the Committee, and copies have been made available by the Vote Office for the use of Members and others. 2. The transcript is an approved formal record of these proceedings. It will be printed in due course. 1 Oral Evidence Taken before the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee on Thursday 18 October 2012 Members present: Mr Graham Allen (Chair) Mr Christopher Chope Sheila Gilmore Fabian Hamilton Simon Hart Tristram Hunt Mrs Eleanor Laing Stephen Williams ________________ Examination of Witness Witnesses: Lord Maclennan of Rogart, Co-Chair of the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Party Committee, gave evidence. Q296 Chair: Good morning. I saw you performing in the House of Lords, Bob, leading your debate, so you are well warmed up for today’s session. Welcome. Would you like to say a few words before we ask you questions? Lord Maclennan of Rogart: First of all, I think this Committee has taken a most important step in promoting a discussion about a nationwide constitutional convention because my view is that piecemeal reform is showing no signs of leading to the sort of changes that might be desirable, and, furthermore, it is a matter for you to look at these issues in the round because change in one part can have unexpected consequences in another part of the constitution. So I think this is a most valuable study. Q297 Mrs Laing: I think the Committee all agree that the piecemeal approach is a fact and given the drawbacks to it that you have just outlined—and have previously mentioned in other fora—do you consider there is a case for establishing a constitutional convention for the UK as a whole in advance of the referendum that is going to take place in Scotland in 2014? Lord Maclennan of Rogart: Yes, I do. I strongly support that notion because I believe that it is important that the Scots, in casting their votes in the referendum, are not persuaded that there is nothing between separation and the status quo. They need to be clear that serious thought is being given to alternatives. To me, that is highly desirable, and I think that having a discussion about alternatives as a back drop to the referendum would be very valuable. Q298 Mrs Laing: Thank you for that. Taking that forward and given the piecemeal reform to which you referred and that this Committee has been looking at, do you consider that there is a need for a convention to clarify the way in which our unwritten constitution has evolved and developed over the last 15 years of piecemeal changes? Lord Maclennan of Rogart: We have lived with an unwritten constitution for a long time. Where there is legal dubiety it can usually be resolved by the courts. I think the time has 2 come to recognise that we need equitable treatment of all the nations of the United Kingdom but that the English question is very important. To answer your question more specifically, yes I think it would make sense to try to rationalise and relate the different changes that have been made. Decentralisation has come and gone; localisation is in a bit of a mess. We need to do this as soon as possible because it will take a long time. I also think that politicians must play their part in this, but if the public is to be convinced and to move towards a consensus on the whole, it would be highly desirable for them to play a part and to look at what has been done, and where there is a consensus that it is not right, then to move on. Q299 Mrs Laing: Would you draw a distinction between the process that was known as the constitutional convention in Scotland in the late 80s and early 90s—in which I know you are well versed because you lived through Scottish politics in that time, as did some of us here—and the kind of constitutional convention that might now look at the development of the unwritten constitution? Lord Maclennan of Rogart: Yes, I would draw a difference. Canon Kenyon Wright is giving evidence later and he will perhaps speak with more authority on this, but I think the Scottish convention was most clearly directed towards the establishment of a Scottish Parliament. We have a much wider agenda for the United Kingdom constitution. We have to consider how to ensure that the best, or at least the possibility of the best, applies across the board to all citizens. It seems to me that some of the changes conform with a modern constitution, such as the Constitution Reform Act 2005, which separated legal decision makers from legislators. That seems to me to be a modern move. We need to bring it all into the spectrum of discussion. It is unsatisfactory—and this is something we consider in other fora—that our constitutional law is not clearly distinguished from other law, so that we have no procedures for amendment which are inherent in making those changes. We sometimes have debates in Committee and sometimes in a Committee of the whole House, but it seems to me that that decision is not taken with an eye to any objective criteria. It is worth considering whether, if we get it right, we want stability that would perhaps make it necessary to have rather larger majorities for a constitutional change, for example. Q300 Mrs Laing: This is a question that the Committee has been exploring and various witnesses have helped us with. Do you consider there ought to be a laid-down, agreed mechanism for distinguishing between constitutional legislation and other legislation? Lord Maclennan of Rogart: Yes I do, and there could be several ways of approaching that. As things stand, the conformity of the legislation with the Human Rights Act is declared on the face of a bill. I am not sure that letting the Government decide—whoever the Government are—whether legislation is a constitutional measure is necessarily the right way to approach it. We could look at the possibility of having advisory committees; we have constitutional advisory committees in Parliament and we could perhaps strengthen those with the addition of senior judges. Q301 Mrs Laing: Right. Would you like to elaborate on that? You mentioned a moment ago that it might be that the constitutional legislation requires more than a mere simple majority to pass. Lord Maclennan of Rogart: It is one way of ensuring that there is closer to a consensus in the country. To me, it is extremely important that, in terms of constitutional matters, people should feel that they own this, that it is theirs and take pride in their constitutional settlement, as is the case in some other countries. 3 Q302 Mrs Laing: That is a salient point that goes to the very heart of what we have been talking about, so I am merely asking this again for the sake of emphasis to get it on the record. You consider that for constitutional matters—rather than simply one side having so many votes and the other side having fewer votes, therefore this is the law that is passed— there should be a mechanism, even within Parliament itself, to try to reach more of a consensus so that most people will go along with it and feel pride in the new settlement? Lord Maclennan of Rogart: Yes, I agree with that completely. Mrs Laing: That is very helpful. Thank you very much. Q303 Tristram Hunt: Is the end point a written text or document, which would then have to be subscribed to by the different assemblies and parliaments? Lord Maclennan of Rogart: That would be an end point quite far down the track I suspect, but nonetheless I think a desirable one. Q304 Tristram Hunt: But even if the process is part of the end point in itself, that would be the finality to be agreed via a referendum, for example. Lord Maclennan of Rogart: Yes. The referendum is a separate question, but yes perhaps. Q305 Tristram Hunt: In a sense the question is, is it a credible process within the parameters of the modern Union? The difference with the Scottish convention was that there seemed to be a degree of corporate consensus about elements of it. Within the Union, it strikes me as far more of a zero sum game within the competing parts. There is certainly some academic literature that suggests that you simply would not be able to square some of the circles, but I suppose the answer is, if we had enough time, you would simply get around that problem. Lord Maclennan of Rogart: I think that it is desirable to try to get around that problem. I think there is far more interest now in England in the shape of our constitution. There is a great deal of interest and discussion about how we relate to the European Union, and how we should relate, as well as about why the Scots are getting so much more out of the Barnett formula, and could we not find a better way of doing it.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oxford DNB: January 2021
    Oxford DNB: January 2021 Welcome to the seventieth update of the Oxford DNB, which adds biographies of 241 individuals who died in the year 2017: 224 with their own entries and seventeen added to existing entries as 'co-subjects'. Of these new inclusions, the earliest born is the journalist Clare Hollingworth (1911-2017) and the latest born is the artist and photographer Khadija Saye (1992- 2017). Hollingworth is one of five centenarians included in this update, and Saye one of thirty-four new subjects born after the Second World War. The vast majority (169, or over 70%) were born in the 1920s and 1930s. Sixty-three of the new subjects who died in 2017 (or just over 26% of the cohort) are women. Twenty of the new subjects were themselves contributors to the dictionary. Forty-five of the new articles include portrait images. From January 2021, the Oxford DNB offers biographies of 64,071 men and women who have shaped the British past, contained in 61,745 articles. 11,870 biographies include a portrait image of the subject—researched in partnership with the National Portrait Gallery, London. As ever, we have a free selection of these new entries, together with a full list of the new biographies. Most public libraries across the UK subscribe to the Oxford DNB, which means you can access the complete dictionary for free via your local library. Libraries offer 'remote access' that enables you to log in at any time at home (or anywhere you have internet access). Elsewhere the Oxford DNB is available online in schools, colleges, universities, and other institutions worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Do We Need a Constitutional Convention for the UK?
    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Do we need a constitutional convention for the UK? Written Evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee and accepted by the Committee as evidence for the inquiry are included. Ordered to be published 14, 21 and 28 June, 10 and 12 July, 6 September, 15, 18 and 30 October and 8 and 29 November 2012 1 List of written evidence Page 1 Canon Kenyon Wright CBE (CC 01, 01A) 3, 6 2 Professor Matthew Flinders (CC 02) 11 3 Constitution Society (CC 03) 14 4 Dr Claire Sutherland (CC 04) 20 5 Dr Alan Renwick (CC 05) 21 6 Graham Pearce and Sarah Ayres (CC 06) 23 7 Michael Gordon and Brian Thompson (CC 07) 29 8 Unlock Democracy (CC 08) 35 9 Democratic Audit (CC 09) 44 10 Professor Iain McLean (CC 10) 53 11 Rt Hon Carwyn Jones AM, First Minister of Wales (CC 11) 57 12 Andrew RT Davies, Leader of the Opposition & Welsh Conservative Assembly Group, Assembly Member for South Wales Central (CC 12) 62 13 Leanne Wood AM, Leader of Plaid Cymru and South Wales Central Assembly Member (CC 13) 65 14 Kirsty Williams AM, Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats and Assembly Member for Brecon and Radnorshire (CC 14) 66 15 James Ware (CC 15) 70 16 Ruth Davidson MSP, Leader of the Scottish Conservatives (CC 16) 72 17 Professor James Mitchell (CC 21) 74 18 Law Society of Scotland (CC 17) 80 19 Sir Merrick Cockell, Chairman, Local Government Association (CC 18) 81 20 Esther A Roberton (CC 19) 83 21 SOLACE (CC 20) 86 22 Simon Cramp (CC 22) 89 23 Nicola Sturgeon MSP, Deputy First Minister, Scottish Parliament (CC 23) 90 24 Karen Ghose, Chief Executive, The Electoral Reform Society (CC 24) 92 25 Dr Robin Wilson (CC 25) 103 26 Nigel Smith, Director, Voxscot (CC 26) 105 27 Cabinet Office (CC 27) 106 28 Sir Edward Lister, Chief of Staff and Deputy Mayor for Policy and Planning (CC 28) 114 2 Written evidence submitted by Canon Kenyon Wright CBE (CC 01) SCOTLAND AND UK CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE “Our constitution is wearing out” Lord Hailsham 1.
    [Show full text]
  • After the Referendum Alan Renwick the CONSITTUTION SOCIETY AFTER the REFERENDUM OPTIONS for a CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION
    Report Options For a For Options Constitutional Convention After Referendum the After Alan Renwick Renwick Alan After the Referendum Alan Renwick THE CONSITTUTION SOCIETY AFTER THE REFERENDUM OPTIONS FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION Alan Renwick First published in Great Britain in 2014 by The Constitution Society Top Floor, 61 Petty France London SW1H 9EU www.consoc.org.uk © The Constitution Society ISBN: 978-0-9928904-0-7 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. AFTER THE REFERENDUM 3 Contents About the Author 5 Summary 6 Part 1: Constitution-Making: The Building Blocks 6 Part 2: Constitution-Making around the World 8 Part 3: How Should the Options be Judged? 9 Part 4: Designs for Constitution-Making in the UK 10 Acknowledgement 13 Introduction 14 Part 1: Constitution-Making: The Building Blocks 17 1.1 What are the Purposes of the 17 Constitution-Making Process? 1.2 Who is Represented? 19 1.3 What Basic Structures are Available? 21 1.4 Who can Influence the Constitution-Making 25 Body’s Deliberations? 1.5 What are the Constitution-Making Body’s 26 Operational Procedures? 1.6 What Happens to the Proposals that are Made? 27 4 AFTER THE REFERENDUM Part 2: Constitution-Making around the World 30 2.1 Expert
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Scotland's Future in Scotland's Hands
    Scotland’s Right to Choose Putting Scotland’s Future in Scotland’s Hands What if that other voice we all know so well responds by saying, 'We say no, and we are the state'? Well we say yes – and we are the people. Canon Kenyon Wright Putting Scotland’s Future in Scotland’s Hands Introduction by the First Minister of Scotland Nicola Sturgeon First Minister of Scotland The Scottish Government believes the best future for Scotland is to be an independent country in order to build a fairer, more prosperous society. It is a fundamental democratic principle that The Scottish Government is a strong advocate the decision on whether or not Scotland of the values of human dignity, freedom, becomes independent should rest with the democracy, equality, the rule of law, and people who live in Scotland. respect for human rights. There has been a significant and material We are therefore committed to an agreed, change in circumstances since the 2014 legal process which adheres to and celebrates referendum and therefore, in line with the those values, and which will be accepted as mandate received in the 2016 Holyrood legitimate in Scotland, the UK as a whole, and election, and reinforced in subsequent UK by the international community. general elections—most recently in December 2019—the Scottish Government believes Scotland is not a region questioning its place people in Scotland have the right to consider in a larger unitary state; we are a country in a their future once again. voluntary union of nations. Our friends in the rest of the UK will always be our closest allies The decision on whether a new referendum and neighbours but in line with the principle of should be held, and when, is for the Scottish self-determination, people in Scotland have the Parliament to make – not a Westminster right to determine whether the time has come government which has been rejected by the for a new, better relationship, in which we can people of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Claim of Right for Scotland on Tuesday 6 September 2016 at Material 4 2.30Pm
    DEBATE PACK Number 2016-0158, 2 September 2016 Claim of Right for By Sarah Priddy Scotland Contents 1. Background to the Summary 1989 Claim of Right 2 Debate Pack prepared ahead of the Westminster Hall debate initiated by Patrick 2. Parliamentary Grady on the Claim of Right for Scotland on Tuesday 6 September 2016 at material 4 2.30pm. 3. Press Articles 6 Subject Specialist: Paul Bowers 4. Further reading and useful links 9 Appendix - Signatories to the 1989 Claim of Right The House of Commons Library prepares a briefing in hard copy and/or online for most non-legislative debates in the Chamber and Westminster Hall other than half-hour debates. Debate Packs are produced quickly after the announcement of parliamentary business. They are intended to provide a summary or overview of the issue being debated and identify relevant briefings and useful documents, including press and parliamentary material. More detailed briefing can be prepared for Members on request to the Library. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Number 2016-0158, 2 September 2016 1. Background to the 1989 Claim of Right The following is taken from the Commons Library briefing on Citizens’ Assemblies and Constitutional Conventions. CBP 07143, 18 July 2016 1.1 Scottish Constitutional Convention 1989 The establishment of a constitutional convention had been a recommendation of the 1988 report, A Claim of Right for Scotland. The report recommended that a convention should be established to draw up a scheme for a Scottish Assembly or Parliament. In January 1989, a cross-party meeting was held to consider proposals for a convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Kenyon Wright: India's Swaraj and the Scottish Parliament
    Swaraj and the Scottish Parliament Home / Issue 7 January 2018/ Parliament Liberation theology from India influenced the work of Canon Kenyon Wright in setting up the Scottish Parliament. At the first anniversary of his death, Alastair McIntosh explores the largely hidden internationalism behind grassroots Scottish politics in the 1990s. When Canon Kenyon Wright died a year ago, on 11 January 2017 at the age of 84, Nicola Sturgeon had been its political executive of the Scottish Constitutional Convention, his gift had been to build consensus, mapping out fresh openings of the way where others could see only tangled briars. Less we while a missionary in West Bengal. I learned of the importance of this while working closely with him twenty years ago. We were engaged in a process that we called People and Parliament, but I had already come to appreciate Kenyon while climate change was climbing up the agenda in the late 1980s and 1990s. He had chaired the Scottish Environmental Forum as preparation for the Rio Earth Summit in 1991. He had played a founding role in Eco-Congregation Scotland in 2001, a network that today exceeds 400 member churches. And although his American-published book, Cosmic Crisis and Creation: the Search for Meaning, did not appear until 2012, he had been a pioneer of ecotheology from at least as early as 1975. That year, at a conference in Tennessee, he had set out his hallmark theme. The In what follows, I want to map out some of the background to the politics of Scotland in the 1990s, culminating in Scot often miss the academic and the mainstream eye.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Constitutional Convention (1995) Scotland’S Parliament: Scotland’S Right (Edinburgh: Convention of Scottish Local Authorities)
    Scottish Constitutional Convention (1995) Scotland’s Parliament: Scotland’s Right (Edinburgh: Convention of Scottish Local Authorities) [note from Paul Cairney: this is a PDF of the copy/pasted text from the SCC’s no-longer- there webpage] Welcome to the new Home page of the Scottish Constitutional Convention. This site has been setup to co-incide with the launch of its new report to the Scottish People, the site has a feedback facility to enable you to send in your comments to us, also included are links to other relevant sites. http://www.almac.co.uk/business_park/scc/ Joint Chairs: Lord Ewing of Kirkford Rt. Hon. Sir David Steel MP Chair of Executive Committee: Canon Kenyon Wright SCOTTISH CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Formation of the Scottish Constitutional Convention The proposal to establish a Constitutional Convention came from a committee of prominent Scots who in July 1988 in their report "A Claim of Right for Scotland" recommended that a Convention should be established to draw up a scheme for a Scottish Assembly or Parliament. The Committee itself was created following the result of the 1987 General Election as they believed action had to be taken on the way Scotland was governed. The Committee met between January and June of 1988, chaired by Professor Sir Robert Grieve with a former senior Scottish Office civil servant Jim Ross as secretary. In January 1989 a cross party meeting was held to consider proposals for a Convention at which the Scottish National Party expressed their reservations concerning a Convention and later withdrew. The Conservative Party had already made it clear they would take no part in the proposed Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedures Committee
    PROCEDURES COMMITTEE Tuesday 27 November 2001 (Morning) Session 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2001. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Tuesday 27 November 2001 Col. CONSULTATIVE STEERING GROUP PRINCIPLES INQUIRY ............................................................................ 1017 STANDING ORDERS (PUBLIC BILLS) ....................................................................................................... 1074 MEMBERS’ BUSINESS........................................................................................................................... 1077 PARLIAMENT AND THE EXECUTIVE (PROTOCOLS) ..................................................................................... 1079 PRESIDING OFFICER AND DEPUTY PRESIDING OFFICERS (ELECTIONS) ........................................................ 1080 PROCEDURES COMMITTEE th 12 Meeting 2001, Session 1 CONVENER *Mr Murray Tosh (South of Scotland)
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation Between Party and Civil Society（2）
    Title Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation between party and civil society（2） Author(s) Shoji, Seita Citation 北大法学論集, 71(5), 307-365 Issue Date 2021-01-28 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80334 Type bulletin (article) File Information lawreview_71_5_10_Shoji.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP 研究ノート Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation between party and civil society（2） Seita Shoji Part 1 1 Chapter 1-Introduction The question of electoral system formation in the Scottish Parliament Literature Review on the electoral system formation of Scottish Parliament Territorial parties and their principles Case and methods Theories on electoral system change Modern Scottish politics research and ‘new politics’ 2 Chapter 2-UK and Scotland: The meaning of territory and demand for autonomy Devolution to Scotland and the request of autonomy On actors―Labour and the SCC The Additional Member System (AMS) 3 Chapter 3 -Consensus building for the establishment of the Scottish Parliament and Labour (1989-1990) Establishment of the SCC and its operation Addressing Home Rule and acceptance of proportional representation （Ⅰ） 北法71（5・307）1269 Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation between party and civil society（2） Part 2 Chapter 4- Constitutional Commission and implementation of AMS (1991-1995) The advancement of the Scottish Constitutional Commission The acceptance and final construction of the completed report Chapter 5 Discussion: Logics of political parties in territory and cooperation Cooperation between Labour and the SCC: logic of autonomy Labour’s inherent logic: logic of union Chapter 6 Conclusion （Ⅱ） A brief comment should also be mentioned with regards to this article (Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995 Cooperation between party and civil society (2)) as part two of further articles which will be in previous volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Convention's Campaign
    Scottish Government Yearbook 1992 Scottish Government Yearbook 1992 Labour Party's Shadow Chancellor, Malcolm Bruce, Leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats, Norman Shanks, Convener of the Church of Scotland's CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION'S CAMPAIGN Church and Nation Committee, Jean McFadden, President of the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, Campbell Christie, General Secretary of the STUC and Isobel Lindsay, Convener of the Campaign for a Scottish Harry Conroy Assembly. The St Andrew's Day event was also seen as the start of the second phase By mid summer 1990, the Scottish Constitutional Convention was nearing of the Convention's work and 100,000 copies of an eight page tabloid completion of the first task set for it by the "Claim of Right for Scotland" newspaper "Scotland's Voice" were produced to both publicise the proposals document which was to "draw up a scheme for a Scottish Assembly." and inform the public. The Convention members then began to look ahead to the next stage A leaflet summarising the main Convention proposals was also published outlined in the "Claim of Right" which was to "mobilise Scottish opinion by the Campaign office which carried for the first time the "Scotland's behind that scheme." Parliament- We Say Yes" logo designed to identify the Campaign. To help achieve this objective the Campaign for a Scottish Assembly The publicity material was an integral part of the Campaign strategy received funding from the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust to pay for a which was agreed by the Convention's Executive in the run-up to the St Campaign Director for the Convention until the next General Election.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation Between Party and Civil Society (1)
    Title Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation between party and civil society (1) Author(s) Shoji, Seita Citation 北大法学論集, 71(4), 127-184 Issue Date 2020-11-27 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/79809 Type bulletin (article) File Information lawreview_71_4_06_Shoji.pdf () Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP 研究ノート Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation between party and civil society（1） Seita Shoji Part 1 1 Chapter 1-Introduction The question of electoral system formation in the Scottish Parliament Literature Review on the electoral system formation of the Scottish Parliament Territorial parties and their principles Case and methods Theories on electoral system change Modern Scottish politics research and ‘new politics’ 2 Chapter 2-UK and Scotland: The meaning of territory and demand for autonomy Devolution to Scotland and the request of autonomy On actors―Labour and the SCC The Additional Member System (AMS) 3 Chapter 3 -Consensus building for the establishment of the Scottish Parliament and Labour (1989-1990) Establishment of the SCC and its operation Addressing Home Rule and acceptance of proportional representation （Ⅰ） 北法71（4・127）759 Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995: Cooperation between party and civil society（1） Part 2 Chapter 4- Constitutional Commission and implementation of AMS (1991-1995) The advancement of the Scottish Constitutional Commission The acceptance and final construction of the completed report Chapter 5 Discussion: Logics of political parties in territory and cooperation Cooperation between Labour and the SCC: logic of autonomy Labour’s inherent logic: logic of union Chapter 6 Conclusion （Ⅱ） A brief comment should also be mentioned with regards to this article (Electoral System Formation in Scottish Parliament 1989-1995 Cooperation between party and civil society (1)) as part one of further articles which will be in subsequent volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultative Steering Group
    CONSULTATIVE STEERING GROUP REFLECTIONS ON 20 YEARS OF THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT October 2019 FOREWORD In November 1997, the then Secretary of State for Scotland asked us to create a blueprint for the Scottish Parliament that was to be established in 1999. Our remit was: To bring together views on and consider the operational needs and working methods of the Scottish Parliament To develop proposals for the rules of procedure and Standing Orders which the Parliament might be invited to adopt To prepare a report to the Secretary of State by the end of 1998, to inform the preparation of Standing Orders Our report, Shaping Scotland’s Parliament, was published a little over a year later and, as well as providing the new Parliament with founding principles to guide its operations, it formed the basis of the procedures and practices that have been followed by the Parliament in its first 20 years. We were delighted to be asked by the current Presiding Officer, the Right Hon. Ken Macintosh MSP, to consider our report in light of the experiences of the Parliament over the intervening years. We have all been involved, either directly or indirectly, in the Parliament’s growth and development over those two decades and have seen it evolve into a central and permanent part of Scottish life. We are pleased, therefore, to offer our reflections on how the Parliament has lived up to our aspirations for what Donald Dewar called back then this “new voice in the land”. Before doing so, however, we wish to acknowledge the massive part played – not only in the work of the Consultative Steering Group but in their contributions on a number of fronts over many decades – by two of our members who are no longer with us: Dr Campbell Christie CBE and Canon Kenyon Wright.
    [Show full text]