T JOIDES PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING 10-12
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
JOIDES PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING 10-12 April 1987 Washington, D.C. AGENDA t Page No. Friday. 10 Aoril 1987 8:30 a.m. [Salmon] Green A. Welcome and Introductions B. Minutes of PCOM Meeting, 19-23 January 1987 181 C. BCOM Report [2] D. NSF Report E. JOI, Inc. Report F. Science Operator Report G. Wireline Logging Services Report H. Indian Ocean Planning . [4] . 27 1. Legs 119 & 120: Kerguelen Saturday. 11 April 1987 8:30 a.m. t H. Indian Ocean Planning (continued) ^ ; 2. Leg 115: Mascarene Plateau/Carbonate Diss. [6] . 35 • 3. Leg 116: Intraplate Deformation & N90*E Ridge . [7] 4. Leg 117: Neogene Package . [8] 5. Leg 118: SWIR .[8] 6. Leg 121: Broken Ridge / 90'E Ridge .... [9] ) 7. Leg 122: Exmouth Plateau [9] . 41 8. Leg 123: Argo Abyssal Plain [10]. 41 \ 9. Co-Chief Recommendations for Indian Ocean Legs [11] i I. Western Pacific Planning [12]. 45 j J. Central and Eastern Pacific Planning [16]. 89 1 K. PCOM Liaisons [18] - ; Sunday. 12 April 1987 8:30 a.m. L. Prioritization of DMP Development Recommendations . [20 ! M. Panel Membership [22^ N. Arctic Drilling [23]. 91 ; 0. ODP Proceedings .[24 1. Citation 2. Incorporation of ^Auxiliary Science' P. Changes to PCOM terms-of-reference and long term planning/ budget input Q. Any Other Business 1. Happy Easter Egg Hunt! Attachments Minutes of 9-11 March 1987 SOHP Meeting 123 V Geochemistry Memo (K.Kvenvolden) 145 Minutes of 13-15 January 1987 SSP Meeting 149 > Western Pacific Panel Third Prospectus 257 002 Item C: BCOM REPORT BUDGET COMMITTEE MEETING 25-26 February 1987 San Franci SCO, CA The Budget Committee (BCOM) met on the 25th and 26th of February in San Francisco to discuss the FY88 draft program plan and budget. The BCOM has made recommendations to JOI based on the following suppositions: a) The target base budget is $35.5 million dollars with enhancements of $1M, based on seven non-U.S. partner members. ' b) The FY88 drilling program, as presented by PCOM, can be accomplished at this budget level. c) The program presented by PCOM (which includes additional expenses for an ice support vessel and drilling one hard-rock site) is representative of the operations to be expected in a normal year. d) A balance between FY88 objectives and long term objectives of the Ocean Drilling Program must be achieved in the budget process. For future BCOM meetings the committee recommends that: a. Copies of the PCOM plan summarized from the annual PCOM meeting and submitted to JOI should also be distributed to the BCOM in advance of their first meeting. [At this BCOM meeting a summary of PCOM's plans was presented orally.] b. Provision for an additional BCOM meeting after the contractors respond to BCOM recommendations and before "administrative review" by NSF should be considered. This meeting would be held if there is a marked disagreement between BCOM recommendations and contractors budget adjustments. c. In the future, the contractors are asked to present all budgets with the following information: the program plan budget, operating budget, (to include carryover from previous years), expenditures and carryovers from previously completed fiscal year (FY86); program plan and operating budget for the present fiscal year (FY87); and proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year (FY88). This data should be arranged in seven vertical columns on each budget sheet. 003 Item C: BCOM Report (continued) The draft program plan should be transmitted to the PCOM at their spring meeting. e. The program plan budget should contain three primary elements: i) Standard Operating Expenses it) Special Operati ng Expenses iii) Enhancements. The Special Operating Expenses would include special operations cost such as ice support vessels; expenses associated with drilling in difficult formations (e.g. bare- rock drilling) and other "large ticket" items such as replacement drilling string. Any deferred expenses from previous years which may be included in this category should be noted. The BCOM strongly recommends that the "base" budget be defined as the sum of both the standard operations + the special operations budget. The BCO'K feels that this budget breakdown provides a very useful ra-anagement tool for planning, especially for the PCOM. The PCOM will have a better understanding of the impact of planning decisions and will provide better guidance on how many special operations should be considered within a fiscal year. To achieve the budget target of $35.5M the BCOM has made specific recommendations to JOI which will be forwarded to the subcontractors. A fall report of the BCOM meeting will be presented at the next EXCON meeting. BUDGET FY88 004 Item H: INDIAN OCEAN PLANNING i 1. Legs 119 & 120: KERGUELEN see report p. 27-33 For the moment the Kerguelen/Prydz Bay program is scheduled as Legs 119 & 120, beginning 7 December 1987 and ending 11 April 1988. i On request of PCOM, the Kerguelen WG met again (11-12 March). The main results are listed below: * Regarding Prydz Bay, two (additional) parallel lines were made available by D.Falvey, BMR/Austral i.a. The four proposed sites seem to be drillable. Implication: Ice boat needed. * It is recommended that one site in the Southern Kerguelen be | deepened to basement in order to achieve more basement ! objecti ves, \ * Weather windows of Kerguelen and Prydz Bay do not [based necessarily match; at a given time either S-Kerguelen or on Prydz Bay seem to be ice free. The optimal weather window Jj^ited for Prydz Bay is the second half of January through the datal first half of February. This is in conflict with the existing schedule. The Kerguelen WG recommends the following compromise, considered to best protect all objectives in these areas {R.Larson, who attended the K-WG meeting as PCOM liaison, may explain details): A. Delay the beginning of Kerguelen drilling by two weeks! [Note: Previous plans always considered the beginning of Kerguelen drilling as a fixpoint (early December)] B. Leg 119 should consist of seven sites: two N-Kerguelen sites (KHP-1, KHP-3 re-entry), one Central-Kerguelen site (SKP-1 to basement and the four Prydz Bay sites (which would be drilled in late January); drilling time approximately 40 days, total length of leg 65 days. C. Leg 120 should consist of five S-Kerguelen sites (SKP-2, SKP-3 re-entry, SKP-4a re-entry, SKP-6a, SKP-8); drilling time 38.6 days, total length of leg 62 days. PCOM IS ASKED TO: i. DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT PRYDZ BAY SITES WILL/CAN BE PART OF THE KERGUELEN DRILLING. A DECISION ON AN ICE BOAT (WHICH IS REQUIRED FOR PRYDZ BAY) CANNOT BE POSTPONED /;^i/Nfui.^^'fr-MAuRITIus..^^; .""('y^' 11^ f \ ^ /--^^e^^V %KHP-3- N«nd I SKP-1 AFRICAN-ANTARCTIC SKP-4A^^SKP-3 BASIN SKP-6B SKP-8 ANTARCTICA Nlft SITES RECOMMENDED BY THE KERGUELEN WORKING GROUP, 11.-12. MARCH 1987 006 Item H: Indian Ocean Planning (continued) ii. REVIEW WHETHER THE KERGUELEN WG PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTABLE REGARDING: (1) BALANCE OF OBJECTIVES (2) LEG COMPOSITION AND LENGTH (3) DELAYING THE BEGINNING OF KERGUEbEN DRILMG BY TWO WEEKS iii. DISCUSS HOW THE PROPOSED SHIFTING OF THE KERGUELEN DRILLING AFFECTS THE ^REST' OF THE INDIAN OCEAN PLANNING (two weeks .'gained' before the Kerguelen) iv. [IF ACCEPTED] HOW THE TWO 'GAINED' WEEKS PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF KERGUELEN DRILLING COULD BEST BE USED Options: add to SWIR; add two days to Leg 115 (see SOHP recommendations); lengthen Leg 116 to assure N90'E Ridge site; addition to Legs 115 & 116 would help Leg 117 with the monsoon season) V. CONSIDER ICE BOAT SUPPORT FOR S-KERGUELEN (in addition to Prydz Bay!) AND ITS IMPACT ON THE BUDGET . 2. Leg 115: MASCARENE PLATEAU / CARBONATE DISSOLUTION (p.35-39) Two co-chiefs have been named: R.Duncan & J.Bachmann (ESF) Note: In Hawaii PCOM decided that Leg 115 will consist of three Mascarene Plateau sites (MP-1: Mascarene Plateau; MP-2: Cargados Bank; MP-3: Nazareth Bank) and a transect of four carbonate, dissolution sites (CARB-1: 1600 m; CARB-2: 3000 m; CARB-3: 3800 m; CARB-4: 4600 m). The DROXLER site M-lwas considered to be a back-up site. A. Regarding the Carbonate Dissolution Transect, SOHP has.made the following recommendations: * Sites CARB 2-4 should be shifted to shallower water depth (saves about one day drilling time) * The broxler site,.MLD-2 (see page37f^, should be added to the first priority objectives of the Carbonate Dissolution Transect (needs about two days drilling time, no steaming) Second priority is to add site MLD-1. Third priority is HPC at Mascarene Plateau site MP-1 at 18'S (200 m sediment) 007 Item H: Indian Ocean Planning (continued) B. Since mid-March the British research vessel, HMS DARWIN, is conducting a site survey at the Mascarene Plateau; Bob Duncan is attending. According to his recent telexes to the JOIDES Office, moving sites CARB 2-4 to alternate sites would cause problems, as the survey encountered slumps and channels. (The site survey cruise will end about the time of the PCOM meeting; we hope that a summary of the results , will be available at the meeting, see p. 35__) C. ' Comments of the lOP (which meets 31 March-1 April) on this leg might be available at the PCOM meeting. D. There is a slight chance that PCOM will decide to delay the beginning of the Kerguelen drilling (see item H.4-^6) by two weeks. If a few days could be added to this leg, SOHP's recommendations of first priority objectives (Droxler sites) could be incorporated.