DOCSLIB.ORG

Workers Without Health Insurance: Who Are They and How Can Policy Reach Them?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Workers Without Health Insurance: Who Are They and How Can Policy Reach Them? WORKERS WITHOUT HEALTH INSURANCE: WHO ARE THEY AND HOW CAN POLICY REACH THEM? A Series of Community Voices Publications BY Bowen Garrett • Len M. Nichols • Emily K. Greenman www.communityvoices.org Opinions and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. WORKERS WITHOUT HEALTH INSURANCE: WHO ARE THEY AND HOW CAN POLICY REACH THEM? BY Bowen Garrett • Len M. Nichols • Emily K. Greenman This research was supported by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. We thank Linda Blumberg and John Holahan for many helpful comments. Any opinions expressed are those of the authors alone, and should not be attributed to the Urban institute, its trustees, or its sponsors. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................1 I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................2 II. BACKGROUND AND PRIOR RESEARCH ..........................................................................................................3 III. DATA AND METHODS ........................................................................................................................................4 IV. FINDINGS ..............................................................................................................................................................5 Basic Facts About Uninsured Workers ................................................................................................................5 A Closer Look At ESI Sponsorship, Eligibility, Take-Up, and Coverage ........................................................8 Effectiveness and Efficiency of Targeting Health Insurance Subsidies to Uninsured Workers ..................18 V. P OLICY OPTIONS .............................................................................................................................................22 Individual Tax Credits .........................................................................................................................................23 Employer Tax Credits ..........................................................................................................................................25 Public Program Expansions ................................................................................................................................25 VI. IMPLICATIONS OF POLICY OPTIONS AND FINDINGS ................................................................................26 Individual or Employer Subsidies .....................................................................................................................26 Tax Credits vs. Public Program Expansions .....................................................................................................27 VII. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................................................28 REFERENCES ...........................................................................................................................................................29 APPENDIX .................................................................................................................................................................31 i LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLES 1. Insurance coverage rates of workers by firm size 2. Insurance coverage rates of workers by industry 3. Insurance coverage rates of workers by family status 4. Insurance coverage rates of workers by wages 5. Insurance coverage rates of workers by wages and firm size 6. Insurance coverage rates of workers by income 7. Insurance coverage rates of workers by income and family status 8. Insurance coverage rates of workers by hours worked 9. Insurance coverage rates of workers by voluntary/involuntary part-time status 10. (a) Insurance coverage rates of regular workers by job tenure 10. (b) Insurance coverage rates of contingent workers by job tenure 11. Insurance coverage rates of workers by gender 12. Insurance coverage rates of workers by race/ethnicity 13. Target effectiveness and efficiency by wages and firm size 14. Target effectiveness and efficiency by income and firm size 15. Target effectiveness and efficiency by income and wages 16. Target effectiveness and efficiency by family status and income Appendix Table 1. Composition of uninsured workers vs. the overall workforce FIGURES 1. Distribution of uninsured workers by industry 2. Distribution of uninsured workers by firm size 3. Distribution of uninsured workers by hours worked per week 4. Distribution of uninsured workers by job tenure 5. Distribution of uninsured workers by hourly wage 6. Distribution of uninsured workers by family income as percentage of FPL 7. Distribution of uninsured workers by family status 8. Distribution of uninsured workers by gender 9. Distribution of uninsured workers by race/ethnicity 10. Reasons for not having ESI among uninsured workers 11. Relationship between sponsorship and take-up rates across industries ii Income is more important than family type as a determi- XECUTIVE UMMARY E S nant of sponsorship, eligibility, and take-up. Income and wages are highly correlated, though not perfectly, Most of the uninsured are either workers or family mem- and more of either is associated with higher sponsor- bers of workers, and most Americans who are covered ship, eligibility, and take-up. Eligibility is not contin- get their health insurance through the workplace. These gent on race, suggesting that anti-discrimination laws facts motivate our study of two questions: Why do appear to be working in this regard. Hispanics are less some workers have employer-sponsored health insurance likely to have offers of health insurance from their while others do not? What policy initiatives are best suit- employers (due to being less likely to work for a firm ed to the specific conditions of most uninsured workers? that sponsors a health plan), but conditional on offer, all We survey the literature on the working uninsured and races are equally likely to take-up the employer-spon- use 1999 Current Population Survey data to paint a more sored health insurance offer they receive. Blacks are less detailed portrait of the working uninsured that can likely than whites to have spousal coverage, which leads inform policy discussions. We report some relatively them to have lower overall coverage rates than whites familiar findings. Workers in small firms, and those who despite being equally likely to have employer-sponsored work in retail, construction, and service firms, are dispro- insurance from their own employer. portionately likely to be uninsured. Workers who earn We define an effective policy as one that would reach low wages, work part-time, have short job tenure, and many uninsured workers, and an efficient policy as one who live in households with low incomes are also among that would extend eligibility to more uninsured than to the more likely to be uninsured. Single workers and the already insured. Workers who work in small firms, workers married to non-workers are more likely to be for low wages, and who live in households with low uninsured than members of two-earner couples. Men are incomes are the natural targets of coverage expansion slightly more likely to be uninsured than women, and policies for the working uninsured. In general, we show blacks and especially Hispanics are more likely than that targeting subsidy dollars to low-income workers whites to be uninsured. More than half of uninsured would be the most efficient policy, since they are the workers (59 percent) work for an employer that does not most likely to be uninsured. Although targeting low- sponsor health insurance, 21 percent are not eligible for wage workers is the most effective option, it is less effi- their employer’s plan, and 20 percent decline the cover- cient than targeting low-income workers because many age they are offered at work. low-wage workers are married to higher-wage workers, We explore deeper and more policy-relevant charac- live in households with higher incomes, and are already teristics of the working uninsured through a series of insured. Targeting workers in small firms is the least two-dimensional cross-tabulations. The first important efficient of the three options, since many high-wage, finding is that workers in larger firms have higher spon- high-income, and already insured workers also work in sorship, eligibility, and take-up rates in every industry. small firms. Among low-income workers, all family Thus, even though there is considerable inter-industry types are similarly efficient to target, because low- variation, firm size is more important than industry as a income workers are much less likely to have coverage determinant of coverage possibilities for workers. for all family types. Because nearly half of uninsured Across industries, sponsorship rates vary more than workers are single and without children, the most effec- take-up rates, which vary more than eligibility rates. tive policies will need to include these workers. Sponsorship and take-up are correlated, which implies Employer or individual subsidies could expand cover- that underlying worker demand—and willingness to age considerably if designed and implemented properly, pay—for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Non State Employer Group Employee Guidebooks
    STATE EMPLOYEE HEALTH PLAN NON-STATE GROUP EMPLOYEES BENEFIT GUIDEBOOK PLAN YEAR 2020 - 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS VENDOR CONTACT INFORMATION .............................................................................................................. 2 MEMBERSHIP ADMINISTRATION PORTAL .................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 4 GENERAL DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 EMPLOYEE ELIGIBILITY ................................................................................................................................ 7 OTHER ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS UNDER THE SEHP .................................................................................... 9 ANNUAL OPEN ENROLLMENT PERIOD ...................................................................................................... 16 MID-YEAR ENROLLMENT CHANGES .......................................................................................................... 17 LEAVE WITHOUT PAY AND RETURN FROM LEAVE WITHOUT PAY …………………………………………22 FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT(FMLA), FURLOUGHS AND LAYOFFS ……………………………………….23 HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT (HIPAA) ............................................ 24 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT PROGRAM - 2021 ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unemployment, Health Insurance, and the COVID-19 Recession
    Support for this research was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation. Unemployment, Health Insurance, and the COVID-19 Recession Anuj Gangopadhyaya and Bowen Garrett Timely Analysis of Immediate Health Policy Issues APRIL 2020 Introduction for many given their reduced income. and the economy, we examine the The sharp reduction in US economic Those losing their jobs and employer- kinds of health insurance unemployed activity associated with public health sponsored health insurance (ESI) would workers have and how coverage efforts to slow the spread of the be able to purchase individual health patterns have shifted over time under the COVID-19 virus is likely to result in insurance (single or family coverage) ACA. Workers who lose their jobs may millions of Americans losing their jobs through the marketplaces established by search for employment or might leave and livelihoods, at least temporarily. the Affordable Care Act (ACA), possibly the labor market entirely. After a while, The global economy is likely already in with access to subsidies (tax credits) unemployed workers searching for jobs recession.1 Economic forecasts suggest depending on their family income. Under may become discouraged and they could that job losses in the second quarter of current law, they must enroll in nongroup also leave the labor market. We compare 2020 could exceed those experienced coverage within 60 days of the qualifying health insurance coverage for working- during the Great Recession.2 Whereas event (e.g., job, income, or coverage age, unemployed adults with that for the monthly U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Erosion of Retiree Health Benefits and Retirement Behavior
    The number of companies The Erosion of Retiree Health Benefits offering health benefits to early retirees is declining, and Retirement Behavior: Implications although reductions in the percentage of early retirees for the Disability Insurance Program covered by health insurance have been only slight to date. by Paul Fronstin* In general, workers who will be covered by health insur Summary year gap between eligibility for DI and ance are more likely than Medicare. In fact, persons with suffi The effects of retiree health insurance other workers to retire before cient means to retire early could use the the age of 65, when they be on the decision to retire have not been income from Disability Insurance to buy come eligible for Medicare. examined until recently. It is an area of COBRA coverage during the first 2 What effect that will have on increasing significance because of rising years of DI coverage. claims under the Disability health care costs for retirees, the uncer Determining the effect of the erosion Insurance program is not yet tain future of Medicare, and increased of retiree health benefits on DI must clear. life expectancy. In general, studies account properly for the role of other Acknowledgments: An earlier suggest that individual retirement deci factors that affect DI eligibility and version of this paper was sions are strongly responsive to the participation. The financial incentives of presented at the symposium on availability of retiree health insurance. Social Security, pension plans, retire Disability, Health, and Retire- Early retiree benefits and retirement ment Age: Challenges for Social ment savings programs, health status, the behavior are also important because they Security Policy, cosponsored by availability of health insurance, and may affect the Social Security Disability the Social Security Administra- other factors influencing retirement tion and the National Academy of Insurance (DI) program.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Health Insurance on Retirement
    BRIGITTE C. MADRIAN Harvard University The Effect of Health Insurance on Retirement FOR DECADES health insurancein the United States has been provided to most nonelderlyAmericans through their own or a family member's employment. This system of employment-basedhealth insurance has evolved largelybecause of the substantialcost advantagesthat employ- ers enjoy in supplyinghealth insurance. By pooling largenumbers of in- dividuals, employers face significantlylower administrativeexpenses thando individuals.In addition,employer expenditures on healthinsur- ance are tax deductible,but individualexpenditures are generallynot. I Despite these cost advantages, there is widespread dissatisfaction with this system of employment-basedhealth insurance. Many people are excluded because not all employersprovide health insurance and not all individualslive in households in which someone is employed. An es- timated 36 million Americans were uninsured in 1990.2 Even among those fortunate enough to have employer-providedhealth insurance, there is mountingconcern that it discourages individuals with preex- isting conditionsfrom changingjobs and, for those who do changejobs, it often means findinga new doctor because insuranceplans vary from firmto firm. I wish to thankGary Burtless, David Cutler, Jon Gruber,Jerry Hausman, Jim Poterba, andAndrew Samwick for theircomments and suggestions. 1. Undercurrent tax law, there are two circumstancesin which individualsmay de- duct theirexpenditures on healthinsurance: (1) those who are self-employedand who do not have
    [Show full text]
  • Kelly Gates, Sr V. Utah Labor Commission and George M
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Utah Court of Appeals Briefs 2001 Kelly Gates, Sr v. Utah Labor Commission and George M. Anderson : Reply Brief Utah Court of Appeals Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2 Part of the Law Commons Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. J. MacArthur Wright; Gallain, Westfall, Wilcox & Welker; counsel for petitioner. Alan Hennebold; Aaron J. Prisbrey; counsel for respondent. Recommended Citation Reply Brief, Gates v. Utah Labor Commission, No. 20010934 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2001). https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/3564 This Reply Brief is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Court of Appeals Briefs by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. Policies regarding these Utah briefs are available at http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/utah_court_briefs/policies.html. Please contact the Repository Manager at [email protected] with questions or feedback. IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS KELLY GATES, SR., No. 20010934-CA Plaintiff/Appellant, v. UTAH LABOR COMMISSION and GEORGE M. ANDERSON, Defendants/Appellee. REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT KELLY GATES, SR. Appeal from the decision of the Utah Labor Commission dated June 28, 2001, reversing the Decision of the Administrative Judge Aaron J. Prisbrey #6968 J. MacArthur Wright #3564 1071 East 100 South GALLIAN, WESTFALL, WILCOX Building D, Suite 3 & WELKER St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of an Employer Health Insurance Mandate On
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO WORKING PAPER SERIES The Effect of an Employer Health Insurance Mandate on Health Insurance Coverage and the Demand for Labor: Evidence from Hawaii Thomas C. Buchmueller University of Michigan John DiNardo University of Michigan Robert G. Valletta Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco April 2011 Working Paper 2009-08 http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/papers/2009/wp09-08bk.pdf The views in this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Effect of an Employer Health Insurance Mandate on Health Insurance Coverage and the Demand for Labor: Evidence from Hawaii Thomas C. Buchmueller Stephen M. Ross School of Business University of Michigan 701 Tappan Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Email: [email protected] John DiNardo Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy and Department of Economics University of Michigan 735 S. State St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Email: [email protected] Robert G. Valletta Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 101 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 email: [email protected] April 2011 JEL Codes: J32, I18, J23 Keywords: health insurance, employment, hours, wages The authors thank Meryl Motika, Jaclyn Hodges, Monica Deza, Abigail Urtz, Aisling Cleary, and Katherine Kuang for excellent research assistance, Jennifer Diesman of HMSA for providing data, and Gary Hamada, Tom Paul, and Jerry Russo for providing essential background on the PHCA. Thanks also go to Nate Anderson, Julia Lane, Reagan Baughman, and seminar participants at Michigan State University, the University of Hawaii, Cornell University, and the University of Illinois (Chicago and Urbana-Champaign) for helpful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 NJSBA Mid-Year Meeting Labor and Employment
    2017 NJSBA Mid-Year Meeting Labor and Employment - A Paella of Issues Whether your client is the Barber of Seville or one of his employees, don’t miss the latest court law, procedures and opinions from both sides of labor and employment law. This seminar will also include a presentation from a Spain-based labor and employment attorney to explain some of the key differences between Spanish and U.S. employment laws. Moderator/Speaker: Peter L. Frattarelli, Esq. Archer & Greiner, PC, Haddonfield Speakers: Paulette Brown, Esq., Immediate Past President of the American Bar Association Locke Lord, LLP, Morristown Miguel Pastur, Partner Bird & Bird, Madrid John L. Shahdanian, II, Esq. Chasan Lamparello Mallon & Cappuzzo, LLC, Jersey City User Name: PETER FRATTARELLI Date and Time: Friday, October 6, 2017 9:25:00 AM EDT Job Number: 54544418 Document (1) 1. ABS Group Servs. v. Board of Review, 2016 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 989 Client/Matter: 999-999-613 | About LexisNexis | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Copyright © 2017 LexisNexis PETER FRATTARELLI Neutral As of: October 6, 2017 1:25 PM Z ABS Group Servs. v. Board of Review Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division February 1, 2016, Resubmitted; April 27, 2016, Decided DOCKET NO. A-1847-12T3 Reporter 2016 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 989 * ABS GROUP SERVICES, INC., Appellant, v. BOARD ABS Group Services, Inc. (ABS) appeals from a final OF REVIEW and ROBERT PRICE, Respondents. agency decision of the Board of Review (Board) that found claimant Robert Price was an ABS employee, Notice: NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE making ABS liable for charges to the State plan for APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION.
    [Show full text]
  • Juneteenth, the Commemoration of the End of Slavery in the United States, Is Celebrated by Black Americans Every June 19Th
    To the LSU SVM Community, We recognize the pain and suffering of many of the black members of our SVM family. We are celebrating Juneteenth, and in light of the recent events, Stephanie Johnson has compiled a list of resources here for those in need (see below for a full list). We see you, we care and we are listening to your needs. Juneteenth, the commemoration of the end of slavery in the United States, is celebrated by Black Americans every June 19th. Read More About Juneteenth Juneteenth, the commemoration of the end of slavery in the United States, will be celebrated by Black Americans on Friday, June 19th amid a national reckoning on race prompted by the police killing of George Floyd and the sweeping demonstrations that followed. Here is information about the holiday, reprinted from the news article "What to know about Juneteenth, the emancipation holiday" by NBC News correspondent Daniella Silva. The article can be read in full here. On June 19, 1865, Gen. Gordon Granger arrived with Union soldiers in Galveston, Texas, and announced to enslaved Africans Americans that the Civil War had ended and they were free — more than two years after President Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation. At the time Lincoln issued the proclamation, there were minimal Union troops in Texas to enforce it, according to Juneteenth.com. But with the surrender of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee two months earlier and the arrival of Granger’s troops, the Union forces were now strong enough to enforce the proclamation. The holiday, which gets its name from the combination of June and Nineteenth, is also known as Emancipation Day, Juneteenth Independence Day and Black Independence Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Seininrto Ai.1R Prbemns Slt Ol He U
    I- v,, \_-Y Vol. 17-e 24I 1W4 UNIVERSITY Of CALIFON IIA -j4lr FED PARLEY JULY 20 IN S.F. |u" Seininr to Ai.1r Prbemns Slt ol he u %-p r v %is I§91Ib 1 1 1 v V Dt*IA ifLV The California AFL-CIO called for thie dis- "The Dumke administration persists in de- A special seminlar on prob- whlich included Sigmund Ary- mssal of Glenn S. ChanceUor of lems confonting women in the witz, chaimn; Loretta Riley Dumke, thie nyinig fundamental employment rights thiat have work force will be held at thie and James Booe, all Federa- California State Unversity and Colleges system long been commonplace for Ameri'can workers Jack Tar Hotel in San Fran- tion vice presidents, and Mary yestlerday, charging thiat Dumnke has shown ill bothi public and priv'ate employment. cisco, Saturday, July 20, 1974. Bergan, legislative advocate "scon-tempt and indifference" toward faculty ef- "Chancellor Dumke refuses to allow negotia- for thie Callfornia Federation of forts to set up fai grievance procedures. tions on grievance procedures wfit representa- Topics at the seminar wil tives of the Unitd Professors of Californa or be limited to two broad areas: Teachers. Asserting that Dumk has "failed his public thie California Labor Federation, 1 Other members of. the special trust and should be removed from office," thie AFL-CIO, rep- -Contractural, -legislative committee are Harold Shean, Executive Council of the -Californa Labor Fed- resenting more thian 1.6 milon Californa work- and legal, questions involvinlg ers. and, also a Federation vice presi- eration, AFL-CIO, adopted thie following state- maternity; dent, and Gwen Newvton of.
    [Show full text]
  • DET-18335-P, Job Center of Wisconsin Business Services
    Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development BUSINESS SERVICES WHERE TALENT & OPPORTUNITY MEET In-person & Online EMPLOYERS CONTACT BUSINESS SERVICES FOR WISCONSIN WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS TO: 1. Recruit qualified workers 2. Retain well-trained and productive employees 3. Access workforce planning resources 4. Build staff diversity through broad pool of skilled job candidates JobCenterofWisconsin.com Recruit and Retain Talent JOB CENTER OF WISCONSIN: Contact Business Services at your local Job Center to access effective, low and no-cost talent development solutions available through the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development and local partners. Let staff help you: post job openings online, recruit talent, coordinate onsite recruitments, collect applications, screen job candidates, administer pre-employment assessments, access hiring incentives and tax credits and more. JobCenterofWisconsin.com/directory Logon to Wisconsin's online public labor exchange to connect with talent at no cost. Build job descriptions based on skills to expand your search for qualified talent. Make informed employment decisions using enhanced tools and MyLMI widgets to access and save integrated labor market information. JobCenterofWisconsin.com COLLEGE INTERNS: Recruit college interns on WisConnect, a free online resource that matches college students with internships by location, college major and key skills. Sign in to develop a company profile, build programs, post internships and search for interns. InternshipWisconsin.com INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES: National workforce studies show that employees with disabilities often have higher than average attendance, job performance, safety and retention rates. Tap into highly reliable, qualified job applicants who are ready to put their diverse abilities to work for you. dwd.wisconsin.gov/dvr/business VETERANS: Seek military experience to build an innovative, resourceful and reliable workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • Tragedy & Remedy: Reparations for Disparities in Black Health
    Boston University School of Law Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2005 Tragedy & Remedy: Reparations for Disparities in Black Health Kevin Outterson Boston Univeristy School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons Recommended Citation Kevin Outterson, Tragedy & Remedy: Reparations for Disparities in Black Health, 9 DePaul Journal of Health Care Law 735 (2005). Available at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/399 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRAGEDY AND REMEDY: REPARATIONS FOR DISPARITIES IN BLACK HEALTH ∗ Kevin Outterson INTRODUCTION The Tragedy of American health care is the stubborn persistence of disparities in Black health,1 140 years after Emancipation, and more than four decades after the passage of Title VI. Formal legal equality has not translated into actual health equality. This Tragedy is deeper and older than mere legal forms; it has been supported by powerful social institutions, including some governments, charities, market participants, religions, ideologies, and cultures. Black health disparities interact with other vestiges of slavery such as disparities in wealth, education, employment and housing. They have permeated the American health experience. Efforts to eliminate Black health disparities will require something more transformative than Title VI. The history of oppression in America is laid bare by Black disparities in health.
    [Show full text]
  • HLA Guide to Appeals
    Guide to Appeals One Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110 Phone +1-617-338-5241 │ Fax +1 617-338-5242 www.healthlawadvocates.org This guide was made possible by funding from the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector Authority. HLA is a public interest law firm dedicated to providing pro bono legal representation to low- income residents experiencing difficulty accessing or paying for needed medical services. Please note: this information is not legal advice. The contents are intended for general purposes only. Table of Contents ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Your Appeal ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Step 1 – Getting Organized ................................................................................................................. 2 Step 2 – Do Your Homework .............................................................................................................. 2 Step 3 – Understanding Your Insurance Plan ............................................................................... 2 Step 4 – Requesting the Claim File ................................................................................................... 5 Step 5 – Talk to Your Doctor ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]