The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OFECONOMICS Vol. CXVI May 2001 Issue 2 THEIMPACT OFLEGALIZED ABORTION ONCRIME* JOHN J. DONOHUE III AND STEVEN D. LEVITT Weoffer evidence that legalized abortion has contributed signi cantly to recentcrime reductions. Crime began to fall roughly eighteen years after abortion legalization.The vestates that allowed abortion in 1970 experienced declines earlierthan the rest of the nation, which legalized in 1973 with Roe v. Wade. Stateswith high abortion rates in the 1970s and 1980s experienced greater crime reductionsin the 1990s. In high abortion states, only arrests of those born after abortionlegalization fall relative to low abortion states. Legalized abortion ap- pearsto account for as muchas 50 percent of therecent drop incrime. I. INTRODUCTION Since1991, theUnited States has experiencedthe sharpest drop inmurderrates since the end of Prohibitionin 1933. Homi- ciderates have fallen morethan 40 percent.Violent crime and propertycrime have each declined more than 30 percent.Hun- dreds ofarticles discussing this changehave appeared in the academicliterature and popular press. 1 Theyhave offered an array ofexplanations:the increasing use of incarceration,growth *Wewouldlike to thank Ian Ayres, Gary Becker, CarlBell, Alfred Blumstein, JonathanCaulkins, Richard Craswell,George Fisher, Richard Freeman,James Heckman,Christine Jolls, Theodore Joyce, Louis Kaplow, Lawrence Katz, John Kennan,John Monahan, Casey Mulligan, Derek Neal,Eric Posner,Richard Posner,Sherwin Rosen, Steve Sailer, Jose ´ Scheinkman,Peter Siegelman, Kenji Yoshino,and seminar participants too numerous to mention for helpful comments anddiscussions. Craig Estesand Rose Francis provided exceptionally valuable researchassistance. Correspondence can be addressed to either John Donohue, Crown Quadrangle,Stanford Law School,Stanford, CA 94305,or StevenLevitt, Departmentof Economics,University of Chicago, 1126 E. 59thStreet, Chicago, IL 60637.Email: [email protected]; [email protected]. 1.For a samplingof the academic literature, see Blumstein and Wallman [2000]and the articles appearing in the 1998 Summer issue (Volume 88) of the Journalof Criminal Law andCriminology, especiallyBlumstein and Rosenfeld [1998],Kelling and Bratton [1998], and Donohue [1998]. See Butter eld [1997a, © 2001by thePresident and Fellowsof Harvard Collegeand theMassachusetts Institute of Technology. The Quarterly Journal ofEconomics, May 2001 379 380 QUARTERLY JOURNALOF ECONOMICS in thenumber of police, improved policing strategiessuch as thoseadopted in NewYork, declines in thecrack cocaine trade, thestrong economy, and increasedexpenditures on victim pre- cautionssuch as securityguards and alarms. Noneof these factors, however, can providean entirelysat- isfactoryexplanation forthe large, widespread, and persistent drop in crimein the1990s. Someof these trends, such as the increasingscale of imprisonment,the rise in police,and expendi- tureson victim precaution, have been ongoing for over two de- cades,and thus cannotplausibly explain therecent abrupt im- provementin crime.Moreover, the widespread natureof the crimedrop arguesagainst explanations suchas improvedpolicing techniquessince many cities that havenot improved their police forces(e.g., Los Angeles) have nonetheless seen enormous crime declines.A similarargument holds forcrack cocaine. Many areas ofthecountry that havenever had apronouncedcrack trade (for instance,suburban and ruralareas) havenonetheless experi- encedsubstantial decreasesin crime.Finally, although a strong economyis supercially consistentwith thedrop in crimesince 1991, previousresearch has established onlya weaklink between economicperformance and violentcrime [Freeman 1995] and in onecase even suggested that murderrates might vary procycli- cally [Ruhm 2000]. Whileacknowledging that all ofthesefactors may have also servedto dampen crime,we consider a novelexplanation forthe sudden crimedrop ofthe1990s: thedecision to legalize abortion overa quartercentury ago. 2 TheSupreme Court’ s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade legalizing abortionnationwide potentially ts the criteriafor explaining alarge,abrupt, and continuingdecrease in crime.The sheer magnitude of thenumber of abortionsperformed satises the rstcriterion that any shockunderlying the recent drop in crimemust be substantial. Sevenyears after Roe v. Wade, over1.6 millionabortions were being performed annually— al- mostone abortion for every two live births. Moreover, the legal- 1997b,1999] for a selectionof articles appearing in The New YorkTimes and Fletcher[2000] for a recentarticle in The Washington Post. 2.We areunaware of anyscholarly article that has examined this effect. We haverecently learned, however, that the former police chief of Minneapolis has writtenthat abortion is “ arguablythe only effective crime-prevention device adoptedin thisnation since the late 1960s” [Bouza 1990]. In hissubsequent 1994 gubernatorialcampaign, Bouza was attacked forthis opinion [Short 1994].Im- mediatelyafter Bouza’ s viewwas publicized just prior to the election, Bouza fell sharplyin the polls. LEGALIZED ABORTION AND CRIME 381 ization ofabortionin vestates in 1970, and thenfor the nation as awholein 1973, wereabrupt legaldevelopments that might plausibly havea similarlyabrupt inuence 15– 20 yearslater whenthe cohorts born in thewake of liberalized abortionwould start reachingtheir high-crime years. Finally, any inuence of a changein abortionwould impact crimecumulatively as succes- siveaffected cohortsentered into their high-crime late adolescent years,providing areasonwhy crimehas continuedto fall year after year. Legalizedabortion may lead toreducedcrime either through reductionsin cohortsizes or through lower per capita offending ratesfor affected cohorts.The smaller cohort that resultsfrom abortionlegalization meansthat whenthat cohortreaches the lateteens and twenties,there will befewer young males in their highest-crimeyears, and thus lesscrime. More interesting and importantis thepossibility that childrenborn after abortion legalization mayon averagehave lower subsequent rates of crim- inality foreither of tworeasons. First, women who have abortions arethose most at riskto give birth tochildren who would engage in criminalactivity. Teenagers, unmarried women, and theeco- nomicallydisadvantaged areall substantially morelikely to seek abortions[Levine et al.1996]. Recentstudies havefound children bornto these mothers to beat higherrisk for committing crime in adolescence[Comanor and Phillips 1999]. Gruber,Levine, and Staiger[1999], in thepaper mostsimilar to ours, document that theearly life circumstancesof those children on the margin of abortionare dif cult along many dimensions: infant mortality, growingup in asingle-parent family,and experiencingpoverty. Second,women may use abortion to optimize the timing of child- bearing.A givenwoman’ s ability toprovidea nurturingenviron- mentto a child can uctuateover time depending onthewoman’ s age,education, and income,as wellas thepresence of afatherin thechild’ s life,whether the pregnancy is wanted,and any drug or alcoholabuse both in uteroand afterthe birth. Consequently, legalized abortionprovides a womanthe opportunity to delay childbearing if thecurrent conditions are suboptimal. Even if lifetimefertility remainsconstant for all women,children are borninto better environments, and futurecriminality is likelyto be reduced. Anumberof anecdotalempirical facts support theexistence and magnitudeof thecrime-reducing impact ofabortion.First, we seea broad consistencywith thetiming of legalization ofabortion 382 QUARTERLY JOURNALOF ECONOMICS and thesubsequent drop in crime.For example, the peak ages for violentcrime are roughly 18 –24, and crimestarts turningdown around1992, roughlythe time at whichthe rstcohort born following Roe v. Wade would hit its criminalprime. Second, as we laterdemonstrate, the vestates that legalized abortionin 1970 saw drops in crimebefore the other 45 statesand theDistrict of Columbia,which did notallow abortionsuntil theSupreme Court decisionin 1973. Third,our more formal analysis showsthat higherrates of abortionin astatein the1970s and early1980s arestrongly linkedto lower crime over the period from 1985 to1997. This nding is trueafter controlling for a varietyof factorsthat inu- encecrime, such as thelevel of incarceration, the number of police,and measuresof the state’ s economicwell-being (the un- employmentrate, income per capita, and povertyrate). The esti- matedmagnitude of the impact oflegalized abortionon crime is large.According to our estimates, as shownon Table II, states with high ratesof abortionhave experienced roughly a 30 percent drop in crimerelative to low-abortion regions since 1985. While onemust be cautious in extrapolatingour results out of sample, theestimates suggest that legalized abortioncan accountfor abouthalf theobserved decline in crimein theUnited States between1991 and 1997. Anumberof factorslead ustobelieve that thelink between abortionand crimeis causal.First, there is norelationship be- tweenabortion rates in themid-1970s and crimechanges be- tween1972 and 1985 (prior tothe point whenthe abortion- affected cohortshave reached the age of signi cant criminal involvement).Second, virtually all ofthe abortion-related crime decreasecan beattributed toreductions in crimeamong the cohortsborn after abortion legalization. There is littlechange in crimeamong older cohorts. Weshould emphasizethat ourgoal is tounderstand why crimehas fallen sharply in the1990s, and toexplore the contri-
Recommended publications
  • Does Large Family Size Predict Political Centrism? Benjamin Schmidt
    Sigma: Journal of Political and International Studies Volume 33 Article 8 2016 Does Large Family Size Predict Political Centrism? Benjamin Schmidt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sigma Part of the International and Area Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Schmidt, Benjamin (2016) "Does Large Family Size Predict Political Centrism?," Sigma: Journal of Political and International Studies: Vol. 33 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sigma/vol33/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sigma: Journal of Political and International Studies by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Does Large Family Size Predict Political Centrism? by Benjamin Schmidt Introduction Suggesting that voting might be correlated with the number of children vot­ ers have has been rare but not unheard of in the last decade. In a 2004 article for American Conservative, Steve Sailer noted a correlation between states with higher birth rates among white voters and the support for incumbent Republican Presi­ dent George W. Bush. Sailer recognized that Bush won the nineteen states with the highest white fertility while Senator John Kerry won the sixteen with the lowest (2004). He also suggested that the lifestyle preferences of white, conservative par­ ents might be to blame for the apparent Republican tilt among states with higher birth rates. A similar trend occurred again in 2012 when majorities in every state with fertility rates higher than 70 per 1,000 women went to Mitt Romney, while all states with fertility rates below 60 per 1,000 women went to Barack Obama (Sandler 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • The Demise of the African American Baseball Player
    LCB_18_2_Art_4_Standen (Do Not Delete) 8/26/2014 6:33 AM THE DEMISE OF THE AFRICAN AMERICAN BASEBALL PLAYER by Jeffrey Standen* Recently alarms were raised in the sports world over the revelation that baseball player agent Scott Boras and other American investors were providing large loans to young baseball players in the Dominican Republic. Although this practice does not violate any restrictions imposed by Major League Baseball or the MLB Players Association, many commentators have termed this funding practice of dubious ethical merit and at bottom exploitative. Yet it is difficult to distinguish exploitation from empowerment. Refusing to lend money to young Dominican players reduces the money invested in athletes. The rules of baseball and the requirements of amateurism preclude similar loans to American-born baseball players. Young ballplayers unlucky enough to be born in the United States cannot borrow their training expenses against their future earning potential. The same limitations apply in similar forms to athletes in other sports, yet baseball presents some unique problems. Success at the professional level in baseball involves a great deal of skill, attention to detail, and supervised training over a long period of time. Players from impoverished financial backgrounds, including predominately the African American baseball player, have been priced out of the game. American athletes in sports that, like baseball, require a significant commitment of money over time have not been able to fund their apprenticeships through self-generated lending markets. One notable example of self-generated funding is in the sport of golf. To fund their career goals, American golfers raise money through a combination of debt and equity financing.
    [Show full text]
  • PSEUDO-DEMOCRACY in a POST-RULE of LAW ERA David Barnhizer, Cleveland State University Daniel D
    Cleveland State University From the SelectedWorks of David Barnhizer 2019 PSEUDO-DEMOCRACY IN A POST-RULE OF LAW ERA David Barnhizer, Cleveland State University Daniel D. Barnhizer, Michigan State University College of Law Available at: https://works.bepress.com/david_barnhizer/128/ PSEUDO-DEMOCRACY IN A POST-RULE OF LAW ERA David Barnhizer and Daniel Barnhizer We are immersed in the ongoing transformation of a system that at best can be described as a pseudo-democracy in a Post-Rule of Law era in which formerly quasi-democratic systems— including the US--are devolving into unprincipled, fragmented and authoritarian surveillance societies. The challenge is how to inhibit what is occurring and protect and preserve the best of what we have had while shaping and incorporating the changes that must be accepted. The answer to our dilemma is far from clear. In using the term pseudo-democracy we are bringing to the surface the idea that we often use the language of democracy too loosely in arguing about the political system we tend to think, or at least assert, exists in the United States. The reality of what Aristotle and the Greek political philosophers meant when using that term bears no resemblance to the system under which we operate in America, a system roughly one thousand times larger than that of Athens and far more complex, diverse and territorially vast than Aristotle could have imagined. In The Politics, Aristotle warned against radical changes to a city-state that would result from growing beyond the size and composition needed for a dynamic but self-contained community.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Economics Imperialism Versus Multidisciplinarity John B
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Economics Faculty Research and Publications Economics, Department of 1-1-2016 Review of Economics Imperialism versus Multidisciplinarity John B. Davis Marquette University, [email protected] Accepted version. History of Economic Ideas, Vol. 24, No. 3 (2016): 77-94. DOI. © 2016 Fabrizio Serra Editore. Used with permission. Forthcoming in History of Economic Ideas Economics imperialism versus multidisciplinarity John B. Davis, Marquette University and University of Amsterdam 2015 STOREP Conference Plenary Lecture Shifting Boundaries: Economics in the Crisis and the Challenge of Interdisciplinarity June 11-13, 2015 Abstract: This paper examines the implications of Chicago School economist Edward Lazear’s 2000 defense of economics imperialism using standard trade theory. It associates that defense with interdisciplinarity or the idea that the sciences are relatively autonomous, but treats this defense as a mask for a more conventional imperialist strategy of promoting Chicago School neoclassicism. Lazear’s argument actually created a dilemma for Chicago regarding how it could espouse interdisciplinarity while operating in a contrary way. I argue that the solution to this dilemma was for neoclassicism to rebuild economics imperialism around neoclassicism as a theory that sees the world in its own image in a performative manner. This strategy, however, suffers from a number of problems, which upon examination ultimately lead us to multidisciplinarity or the idea that the sciences can have transformative effects on one another. This latter conception can be associated with a complexity economics approach as an alternative view of the relation between the sciences. The paper argues that this view provides a basis for pluralism in economics.
    [Show full text]
  • Freakonomics: a Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything
    Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything By Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner New York City, William Morrow 2005 242pp, $51.95, ISBN 0 06 073132X The University of Chicago has a tradition of producing economists that push the boundaries of the discipline. This is the school that nurtured innovative and iconoclastic thinkers such as Milton Friedman (on macroeconomic stabilisation policy), Robert Lucas (on the use of ‘rational’ rather than Keynesian ‘adaptive’ expectations) and Gary Becker (on the economics of the family). Steven Levitt and his journalist co-author, Stephen Dubner, appear to be following this tradition by publishing a book that deals with a range of topics that do not fall within the realm of mainstream economics—hence the book’s title. Freakonomics can best be described as a sort of Bill Bryson guide to applied social science. It considers a number of disparate behavioural phenomena and seeks to make sense of them, sometimes drawing on economic hypotheses but always relying heavily on data. It is the emphasis on data that is the book’s strongest feature. Levitt and Dubner discuss innovative techniques for identifying match-rigging by sumo wrestlers, cheating by Chicago school teachers, the impact of parents on children’s school test scores and other diverse topics. The approach used to test sumo match-rigging is especially fascinating and is compulsory reading for anyone planning to sit a graduate job interview for McKinsey. Levitt and Dubner explain that the top wrestlers compete in tournaments six times a year. Each tournament comprises fifteen matches.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Racism Topic Paper
    CEDA Topic Paper Anti-Racism Proposal 2016-17 Policy Debate Claudette Colvin C.T. Vivian Chase Iron Eyes T. R. M. Howard Yuri Kochiyama Reies López Tijerina Daisy Lee Gatson Bates Anti-Racism Topic Paper April 2016 Janet Escobedo, Georgia State University; Samuel Hanks, Georgia State University; Nadia Hussein, Georgia State University; and Dr. Kevin Kuswa, Berkeley Preparatory in Tampa, Florida. —with advice and feedback from Rashad Evans, University of Puget Sound and Dr. Tim Barouch, Georgia State University Page 1 of 161 “Paradigms, however, are like frost crystals that disappear on exposure to the sun. As soon as one starts talking about a paradigm, its days are numbered,” R. Delgado, ’12 “We’re living in more chains today -- through lockdowns, ankle bracelets, halfway houses,… -- than we were in the early 1800’s. That’s something to think about.” Frank W. Wilderson, ‘14 CEDA Topic Paper Anti-Racism Proposal 2016-17 Policy Debate Table of Contents Anti-Racism Topic Area Proposal .................................................................................................................................................... 4 I. “Anti-Racial Exclusion” Phrasing ........................................................................................................................ 9 Racial Disparity ............................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Racial Inequality .............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gary Becker's Early Work on Human Capital: Collaborations and Distinctiveness
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Teixeira, Pedro Article Gary Becker's early work on human capital: Collaborations and distinctiveness IZA Journal of Labor Economics Provided in Cooperation with: IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Suggested Citation: Teixeira, Pedro (2014) : Gary Becker's early work on human capital: Collaborations and distinctiveness, IZA Journal of Labor Economics, ISSN 2193-8997, Springer, Heidelberg, Vol. 3, pp. 1-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40172-014-0012-2 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/152338 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence
    [Show full text]
  • By Ralph De Toledano the Last Published Work of the Late, Great Conservative Writer and Historian
    Election though all newborns look alike. Pictures of the new twins from the most cele- Maternal Flame brated breeding stock—Jolie and Brad Pitt—went for a reported $14 million. Sarah Palin’s family-friendly appeal. An obsession in politics with breeding is both very old (hereditary monarchy) By Steve Sailer and very contemporary. The main quali- fications of the current president and WHY, IN ONE UPROARIOUS week of with a broken arm after being thrown 70 this year’s Democratic runner-up are that American politicking that not even H.L. feet. Did I mention he’s part Eskimo? they are, respectively, the scion and con- Mencken would have expected, has the Mrs. Palin’s instant ascent to frontier sort of ex-presidents. More subtly, obscure governor of Alaska, Sarah folk hero explains some of the unhinged Obama launched himself at the 2004 Palin, outraged roughly one half of the hatred felt by Obama supporters. They’d Democratic convention by devoting the country and overjoyed the other? been fantasizing about their genetically first 380 words of his famous speech to What intrigues people about elections nuanced man of the future, their political detailing the two stocks from which he aren’t the platform planks. Deep down, Tiger Woods, when they were blindsided was crossbred. He implied that, like the political contests are about picking sym- by a figure out of America’s buried past, a heir to a dynastic merger of yore—think bolic champions. Just as Barack Obama, merrily comic Wild West character in the King Henry VIII, offspring of a Lancaster- recently of the Illinois legislature, has tradition of Annie Oakley and Calamity York marriage that ended the War of the excited tens of millions by his emphasis Jane.
    [Show full text]
  • Coase Theorem” Asserts That in the Absence of Transaction Costs, Parties to an Externality Will Bargain to an Efficient Outcome
    Abstract The \Coase theorem" asserts that in the absence of transaction costs, parties to an externality will bargain to an efficient outcome. It also claims that the resulting level of externality-generating is inde- pendent of initial assignment of rights. It is well-known that Coase's second claim is true if utility is quasi-linear so that the valuation of externalities does not depend on wealth. This paper finds a class of preferences for which Coase's second claim is true when there are wealth effects. It presents a necessary and sufficient condition for Coase's second claim and discusses applications of this result. 1 When Was Coase Right? Ted Bergstrom∗ Economics Department, University of California Santa Barbara [email protected] June 21, 2017 ∗This paper is dedicated to the memory of Richard Cornes and Leo Hurwicz, with whom it was my privilege to share thoughts and puzzlements about this topic. I am grateful to Di Wang of UCSB for useful discussions and for steering me to the Chipman-Tian paper, and also to Guoqiang Tian for helpful discussions. 1 Ronald Coase [7] argued that the amount of damage that one party causes to another typically depends on the actions of both parties. Coase maintained that, regardless of the way that the law assigns liability, if the perpetrator and recipient are able to bargain freely, they are likely to reach an efficient outcome. Coase's paper consists of a series of examples and insightful discussions. He made no claims of a formal theorem based on explicit assumptions. The term \Coase Theorem" seems to originate with George Stigler, who explained Coase's ideas in his textbook The Theory of Price [13], pp 110-114.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Impact of Crack Cocaine
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MEASURING THE IMPACT OF CRACK COCAINE Roland G. Fryer, Jr. Paul S. Heaton Steven D. Levitt Kevin M. Murphy Working Paper 11318 http://www.nber.org/papers/w11318 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 May 2005 We would like to thank Jonathan Caulkins, John Donohue, Lawrence Katz, Glenn Loury, Derek Neal, Bruce Sacerdote, Sudhir Venkatesh, and Ebonya Washington for helpful discussions on this topic. Elizabeth Coston and Rachel Tay provided exceptional research assistance. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Sherman Shapiro, the American Bar Foundation, and the National Science Foundation. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. ©2005 by Roland G. Fryer, Paul S. Heaton, Steven D. Levitt, and Kevin M. Murphy. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Measuring the Impact of Crack Cocaine Roland G. Fryer, Paul S. Heaton, Steven D. Levitt, and Kevin M. Murphy NBER Working Paper No. 11318 May 2005 JEL No. J00 ABSTRACT A wide range of social indicators turned sharply negative for Blacks in the late 1980s and began to rebound roughly a decade later. We explore whether the rise and fall of crack cocaine can explain these patterns. Absent a direct measure of crack cocaine’s prevalence, we construct an index based on a range of indirect proxies (cocaine arrests, cocaine-related emergency room visits, cocaine- induced drug deaths, crack mentions in newspapers, and DEA drug busts).
    [Show full text]
  • N\/FRTYDISCUSSION P'--./ V L- "I · I PAPERS
    151-72 'J> NST TUTE FOR jl . r I RESEARCH ON n\/FRTYDISCUSSION P'--./ v l- "I · I PAPERS ECONOMICS OF ETHNIC DISCRIMINATION, INTEGRATION, . AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME Ubadigbo Okonkwo f;.~,~;,#' )1\.." }J?". ;)4'.',.', '.. ; ~ I ' ,:' t':J), ~!;.~ll;1': , ,,< t, t. ,"1 UNIVERSllY OF WISCONSIN -MADISON llU ,10 ECONOMICS OF ETHNIC DISCRIMINATION, INTEGRATION, AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME Ubadigbo Okonkwo The author is a graduate student at The University of Rochester, 'Rochester, New York. The research for this paper was completed in,the summer of 1972 when the author was a Summer Research Fellow of the Black Economists' Development Project (at U.C.L.A., California). The fellowship was held at the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Financial assistance and research support are gratefully acknowledged from the Project., This research was also supported by funds granted to the Poverty Institute by' the Office of Economic Opportunity pursuant to,the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964. The paper was.presented at the third annual workshop of,the,Caueus,of Black Economists held at Atlanta University, Atlanta, Georgia, September 1972. The paper has also greatly benefited from helpful comments and criticisms, on earlier versions, by friends and teachers, especially Professors Sherwin Rosen, Ronald W. Jones, Rudolph G. Penner and Donald J. O'Hara of the University of Rochester, and Professors Robert Haveman, Glen Cain, Stanley Masters and Irwin Garfinkel of the Poverty Institute. The above mentioned institutions and individuals are, of course, not responsible for any errors, in analysis and opinion, that remain. December 1972 ABSTRACT This paper critically examines some of the better known economic models of ethnic discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICA's CHALLENGE: Domestic Security, Civil Liberties, and National Unity After September 11
    t I l AlLY r .... )k.fl ~FS A Ot:l ) lO~Ol R.. Muzaffar A. Chishti Doris Meissner Demetrios G. Papademetriou Jay Peterzell Michael J. Wishnie Stephen W. Yale-Loehr • M I GRAT i o~]~In AMERICA'S CHALLENGE: Domestic Security, Civil Liberties, and National Unity after September 11 .. AUTHORS Muzaffar A. Chishti Doris Meissner Demetrios G. Papademetriou Jay Peterzell Michael J. Wishnie Stephen W . Yale-Loehr MPI gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton in the preparation of this report. Copyright © 2003 Migration Policy Institute All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior permission in writing from the Migration Policy Institute. Migration Policy Institute Tel: 202-266-1940 1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 300 Fax:202-266-1900 Washington, DC 20036 USA www.migrationpolicy.org Printed in the United States of America Interior design by Creative Media Group at Corporate Press. Text set in Adobe Caslon Regular. "The very qualities that bring immigrants and refugees to this country in the thousands every day, made us vulnerable to the attack of September 11, but those are also the qualities that will make us victorious and unvanquished in the end." U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson Speech to the Federalist Society, Nov. 16, 2001. Mr. Olson's wife Barbara was one of the airplane passengers murdered on September 11. America's Challenge: Domestic Security, Civil Liberties, and National Unity After September 1 1 Table of Contents Foreword
    [Show full text]