DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 156

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 156 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 156 / Wednesday, August 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules 48331 i.e., NVOCCs and ocean carriers regulation, if adopted, would have hearing, Sonya Cruse, 202–622–4693 handling the importer’s/consignee’s presented a considerable challenge to (not toll-free’’. shipments. CBP agrees that the statute is administrative efficiency for both CBP Cynthia E. Grigsby, designed to protect the identities of and importers and consignees. Chief, Regulations Unit, Associate Chief importers and consignees (and their Dated: August 7, 2003. shippers if desired) for reasons that are Counsel (Procedure and Administration). Robert C. Bonner, related to their own competitive well [FR Doc. 03–20666 Filed 8–12–03; 8:45 am] being, not for reasons related to the Commissioner, Customs and Border BILLING CODE 4830–01–P Protection. competitive well being of the NVOCCs and ocean carriers filing manifest [FR Doc. 03–20567 Filed 8–12–03; 8:45 am] information in accordance with the ‘‘24- BILLING CODE 4820–02–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION hour rule.’’ AGENCY Thus, upon review of the comments 40 CFR Part 300 and further review of the matter, CBP DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY recognizes that allowing these other [FRL–7542–8] parties to file confidentiality requests Internal Revenue Service for their importer and consignee clients National Oil and Hazardous will not further the intent of the law’s 26 CFR Part 1 Substances Pollution Contingency confidentiality provision to protect the Plan; National Priorities List interests of the importers/consignees, [REG–209377–89] but will instead serve the interests of AGENCY: Environmental Protection these other parties at the expense of RIN 1545–BA69 Agency. users of manifest information whose ACTION: Notice of intent to partially interest this law is also intended to At-Risk Limitations; Interest Other delete the Monticello Mill Tailings serve. Importers and consignees already Than That of a Creditor; Correction (USDOE) Superfund Site from the enjoy the benefits of this law through National Priorities List. AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the current regulation, which allows Treasury. SUMMARY: confidentiality requests to be made by The Environmental Protection their authorized employees, attorneys, ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed Agency (EPA) Region 8 is issuing a or officials. rulemaking. notice of intent to partially delete the Moreover, CBP is further persuaded Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) SUMMARY: by several of the other comments This document contains a Superfund Site (the Site) located in opposing the proposed amendment and correction to a notice of proposed Monticello, Utah, from the National submits that the weight of these other rulemaking relating to the treatment, for Priorities List (NPL) and requests public comments, taken together, provides purposes of the at-risk limitations, of comments on this notice of intent. The additional support for a decision to amounts borrowed from a person who NPL, promulgated pursuant to section abandon the NPRM. Primary among has an interest in an activity other than 105 of the Comprehensive these other reasons against adoption of that of a creditor or from a person Environmental Response, the proposal are that the proposal, if related to a person (other than the Compensation, and Liability Act adopted, would cause some degree of borrower) with such an interest. (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is found harm to certain elements of the trade FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara at appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 of the community without producing a P. Volungis (202) 622–3080 (not a toll- National Oil and Hazardous Substances beneficial impact on the law’s free number). Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). The beneficiaries or achieving a result SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has determined that all appropriate mandated by law; the proposal would response actions under CERCLA, other create an unacceptable operational Background than operation and maintenance and burden on CBP; and it would create The proposed regulations that are the five-year reviews, have been completed. additional operational burdens on all subject of this correction are under However, this partial deletion does not involved parties, including the section 465 of the Internal Revenue preclude future actions under importers and consignees who may Code. Superfund. The State of Utah, through request confidentiality under the the Utah Department of Environmental current regulation without preparing a Need for Correction Quality (UDEQ), concurs with the power of attorney or authorization As published, the proposed decision for partial deletion of the Site letter. Also, the proposed amendment regulations REG–209377–89, contains from the NPL provided that no adverse raised a number of significant questions, an error that may prove to be misleading comments are received during the as made clear by the comments for and and is in need of clarification. public comment period. against, and as discovered by CBP In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ Correction of Publication during its further review of the matter, section of today’s Federal Register, we indicating that amending the process as Accordingly, the publication of the are publishing a direct final notice of proposed is more complicated and proposed regulations REG–209377–89, partial deletion of the Site without prior problematic than initially contemplated. which is the subject of FR Doc. 03– notice of intent to partially delete This recommends to an additional 17090, is corrected as follows: because we view this as a extent abandonment of the project. 1. On page 40583, column 3, in the noncontroversial revision and anticipate In summary, it is clear that there is no preamble, under the paragraph heading no adverse comments. We have consensus among members of the trade FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT explained our reasons for this partial community on the value of adopting the paragraph 1, lines 4 and 5, the language deletion in the preamble to the direct proposed regulation and that the greater ‘‘requests for a public hearing, [Insert final partial deletion. If we receive no weight of the comments is persuasively Name], 202–622–7180 (not toll-free’’ is adverse comments on this notice of against adoption. Also, the proposed corrected to read ‘‘requests for a public intent to partially delete or the direct VerDate jul<14>2003 15:39 Aug 12, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13AUP1.SGM 13AUP1 48332 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 156 / Wednesday, August 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules final notice of partial deletion, we will List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 petition before the Board to use its not take further action on this notice of Environmental protection, Air exemption authority under 49 U.S.C. intent to partially delete. If we receive pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous 10502. Petitioners ask the Board to adverse comments, we will withdraw waste, Hazardous substances, adopt a new class exemption for use by the direct final notice of partial deletion Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, small carriers in abandoning rail lines. and it will not take effect. In such case, Reporting and recordkeeping Petitioners claim that the proposal would eliminate current regulatory we will, as appropriate, address all requirements, Water pollution control, incentives for small carriers to delay public comments in a subsequent final Water supply. partial deletion notice based on this abandonment while letting the traffic notice of intent to partially delete. We Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. base and physical condition of low- 9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, will not institute a second comment density lines deteriorate; subject exit 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, and entry to the rail industry to market period on this notice of intent to 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193. partially delete. Any parties interested forces; and increase the dissemination in commenting must do so at this time. Dated: July 31, 2003. of commercial information to facilitate For additional information, see the Robert E. Roberts, the offer of financial assistance (OFA) direct final notice of partial deletion Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA Region 8. procedures. In addition, petitioners which is located in the ‘‘Rules and [FR Doc. 03–20431 Filed 8–12–03; 8:45 am] claim that the proposal would reduce Regulations’’ section of this Federal BILLING CODE 6560–50–P the administrative burdens on the Register. Board. The proposal would allow small carriers to file a notice of exemption DATES: Comments concerning this Site DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION must be received by September 12, whenever they make the business 2003. Surface Transportation Board decision that a given line was no longer economically viable. Petitioners argue ADDRESSES: Written comments should 49 CFR Part 1152 that their proposal would eliminate be addressed to: Mr. Paul Mushovic delays in the abandonment process and (8EPR–F), Remedial Project Manager, [STB Ex Parte No. 647] allow small carriers to quickly redeploy U.S. EPA Region 8, 999 18th Street, limited assets. This, petitioners Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80202– Class Exemption for Expedited maintain, would facilitate maintenance 2466, [email protected], (303) Abandonment Procedure for Class II and infrastructure upgrades necessary 312–6662 or 1–800–227–8917. and Class III Railroads for small carriers to continue in operation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ACTION: Advance notice of proposed For The proposed notices of exemption rulemaking. information regarding Site deletion, would include 36-months of traffic and contact Mr. Paul Mushovic (8EPR–F), revenue information, a description of Remedial Project Manager, U.S. EPA SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board (Board) has received a proposal to the current physical condition of the Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite 300, line, an estimate of rehabilitation, the Denver, Colorado 80202–2466, create a class exemption under 49 [email protected], (303) 312– U.S.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks
    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • Midville Mahrt
    Rochester Buffalo Silver Springs Erie Mt. Jewett PENNSYLVANIA Driftwood New Castle Peoria Homer City Pittsburg Havana ILLINOIS York Springfield ILLINOIS MISSOURI KENTUCKY Murray Elizabethton Paris Johnson City Dresden Henry ETRY Bruceton McKenzie Cumnock Sanford ARKANSAS ATW Chattanooga TENNESSEE NORTH CAROLINA Danville Chickamauga East Greenville Little Rock Hedges Rock CCKY CPDR HR Laurens T Berryton Hartsville RR Darlington GN SCRF Florence Bishopville Amory Fordyce Atlanta Fordyce ABR R FC WR GR Banks Greenwood West Point Belk RC GW Eupora LXVR Hermitage Fernbank Talladega Columbus SCS EARY Greenville Sylacauga Crosset Crossett Gantts Quarry SA N AGR LW SOUTH Midville CAROLINA Bastrop GEORGIA Macon NS GM R Operated by Pioneer Demopolis GC GM Selma Columbus R Nunez Meridian Montgomery Dublin Linden CCH GSWR Monroe MNBR Nuckols GMR ALABAMA Garden City GC SAPT Mahrt Helena Vidalia Savannah NS Americus Kimbrough Cordele White Preston CSX GeorgetownGITW Oak Genesee & Wyoming Railroads Troy Smithville Richmond Hill Hybart Eufaula HOG HOG Heart of Georgia Railroad COEH GSWR Dawson CSX Goshen BAYL The Bay Line Railroad, L.L.C. Cuthbert CCH Columbus & Chattahoochee Railroad, Inc. RSOR GC Georgia Central Railway, L.P. MISSISSIPPI Georgiana Riceboro Abbeville Albany GSWR Georgia Southwestern Railroad, Inc. HAL Hilton & Albany Railroad, Inc. LOUISIANA HAL GFRR Dashed line indicates Trackage Rights. Waterford BAYL Gray line indicates Out of Service. Arlington TNHR WGCR 07/2017 Andalusia Enterprise Grime s Hilton SMWR R CIRR FR Dothan G GFRR Saffold G F Atmore RR GITM Lynn Bainbridge Seals Cottondale CS Valdosta X Chattahoochee CS X Kingsland SM Mobile VR Clyattville Cantonment FCRD Fernandina Yulee GFRR Jacksonville Pensacola FLORIDA Lake Charles Lafayette TTR New Iberia AN FE Panama C City Port St.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight and Intermodal
    Kentucky Statewide Rail Plan 2015 CHAPTER 2: FREIGHT AND INTERMODAL This chapter defines the Kentucky rail system by describing the major characteristics of each operating freight railroad and details key system‐wide trends and conditions. It also depicts major types and quantities of goods shipped from, to, and through Kentucky, including descriptions of some of the multimodal linkages. Rail transportation is a safe and efficient mode for transporting freight. Figure 2‐1 provides a graphic comparison of cargo carrying capacity by various modes. All modes have advantages and disadvantages in the movement of freight. The choice between modes is often tied to the location, type of commodity, price of shipment, and connections to other modes. In comparing the cargo capacity of each mode in terms of energy, safety, and environmental impacts, freight rail transportation typically ranks better than trucking but usually does not perform as well as barging.6 Figure 2‐1: Comparison of Cargo Carrying Capacity by Mode Source: http://www.iowadot.gov/compare.pdf, 2014 6 http://www.aclines.com/site/safety‐sustain/environmental‐benefits‐of‐barging.html, 2014 Page 2‐1 Kentucky Statewide Rail Plan 2015 2.1 FREIGHT RAILROAD COMPANIES OPERATING IN KENTUCKY AND THE REGION The connection between Kentucky’s rail system and the Eastern and Middle United States’ Class I railroad system from the east coast to just west of the Mississippi River is displayed in Figure 2‐2. The Kentucky rail system, shown in Figure 2‐3, is comprised of 23 railroads (owning, operating, or having trackage rights), including one port railroad and five museum/tourist railroads, three of which operate on private track.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Georgia State Rail Plan
    State Rail Plan Georgia State Rail Plan Final Report Master Contract #: TOOIP1900173 PI # 0015886 State Rail Plan Update – FY 2018 4/6/2021 State Rail Plan Contents 1. The Role of Rail in Statewide Transportation ......................................................................................... 1-7 1.1. Purpose and Content ...................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.2. Multimodal Transportation System Goals ...................................................................................... 1-8 1.3. Role of Rail in Georgia’s Transportation Network .......................................................................... 1-8 1.4. Role of Passenger Rail in Georgia Transportation Network ......................................................... 1-16 1.5. Institutional Governance Structure of Rail in Georgia ................................................................. 1-19 1.6. Role of Federal Agencies .............................................................................................................. 1-29 2. Georgia’s Existing Rail System ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1. Description and Inventory .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2. Trends and Forecasts ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports
    FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety •3 DOT/FRA/RRS-22 Effective: January 1997 FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports CONTENTS Introduction Chapter 1 Overview of Accident/Incident Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Chapter 2 Definitions Chapter 3 Form FRA F 6180.55 - Railroad Injury and Illness Summary Chapter 4 Form FRA F 6180.98 - Railroad Employee Injury and/or Illness Record Chapter 5 Form FRA F 6180.97 - Initial Rail Equipment Accident/Incident Record Chapter 6 Form FRA F 6180.55a - Railroad Injury and Illness Summary (Continuation Sheet) Chapter 7 Form FRA F 6180.54 - Rail Equipment Accident/Incident Report Chapter 8 Form FRA F 6180.81 - Employee Human Factor Attachment Chapter 9 Form FRA F 6180.78 - Notice to Railroad Employee Involved in Rail Equipment Accident/Incident Attributed to Employee Human Factor Employee Statement Supplementing Railroad Accident Report Chapter 10 Form FRA F 6180.57 - Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Accident/Incident Report Chapter 11 Form FRA F 6180.56 - Annual Railroad Report of Employee Hours and Casualties by State APPENDICES Appendix A Railroad Codes Appendix B State Codes Appendix C Train Accident Cause Codes Appendix D Employee Job Codes FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports CONTENTS - Continued Appendix E Injury and Illness Codes Appendix F Circumstance Codes Appendix G FRA Regional Offices and Headquarters Appendix H Forms Appendix I Model Internal Control Plans, including Model Statement of Policy against Harassment and Intimidation and Model Complaint Procedures FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/lncident Reports INTRODUCTION A railroad is required by Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) regulations at Title 49, Part 225 of the Code of Federal Regulations to use the current FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/lncident Reports (“Guide” or “reporting guide”) when preparing its monthly report.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 172/Wednesday, September 5
    Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2012 / Notices 54655 identified and considered early in the determination, and its finding may be FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Section 106 review process. rebutted by filings and evidence Jonathon Binet, (202) 245–0368. submitted into the record for this [Assistance for the hearing impaired is VII. Definitions proceeding. The Board will give careful available through the Federal If not specifically addressed below, consideration to any claims that the Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– terms used within this Program Transaction would have anticompetitive 800–877–8339.] Comment shall be defined consistent effects that are not apparent from the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: GWI is a application itself. with the definitions provided in 36 CFR publicly traded, noncarrier holding part 800. DATES: The effective date of this company. RailAmerica is a publicly Common Bridge is, for purposes of decision is September 5, 2012. Any traded, noncarrier holding company. this Program Comment, a common post- person who wishes to participate in this See Appendix B for a complete list of 1945 bridge or culvert of a type proceeding as a party of record (POR) each company’s relevant holdings. identified in Section V. must file, no later than September 19, Program Comment is an alternative to 2012, a notice of intent to participate. Applicants state that, pursuant to an Section 106 review that allows a Federal All comments, protests, requests for agreement and plan of merger agency to request the ACHP to comment conditions, and any other evidence and (Agreement), Jaguar Acquisition Sub, on a category of undertakings in lieu of argument in opposition to the primary Inc., a newly formed, wholly owned conducting individual reviews under application and related filings, noncarrier subsidiary of GWI, would Sections 800.4 through 800.6 of the including filings by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 125 / Thursday, June 27, 1996 / Notices
    33580 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 125 / Thursday, June 27, 1996 / Notices Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board through his purchase of Green Bay under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed may not use its exemption authority to Packaging, Inc.'s (GBP) ownership at any time. The filing of a petition to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory interests in the aforementioned entities reopen will not automatically stay the obligation to protect the interests of its and railroads. Currently, Durden and transaction. An original and 10 copies of employees. Section 11326(c), however, GBP each hold a 49.5% interest and all pleadings, referring to STB Finance does not provide for labor protection for RMC holds a 1% interest in Partners, a Docket No. 32947 (Sub-No. 2), must be transactions under sections 11324±25 Delaware limited partnership; Durden filed with the Office of the Secretary, that involve only Class III rail carriers. and GBP each own a 50% interest in Case Control Branch, Surface Because this transaction involves Class RMCC, a non-carrier holding company; Transportation Board, 1201 Constitution III rail carriers only, the Board, under and Durden and GBP each own a 50% Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20423. In the statute, may not impose labor interest in each of the railroads in the addition, a copy of each pleading must protective conditions for this RMCC Railroad Group. By this be served on Edward J. McAndrew, transaction. transaction, Durden will acquire 100% Slover & Loftus, 1224 Seventeenth If the verified notice contains false or ownership and control in Partners, Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 157 / Thursday, August 14, 1997 / Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 157 / Thursday, August 14, 1997 / Notices 43577 addition, CCPN will acquire incidental Corpus Christi Authority of Nueces of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 trackage rights over lines of UP between County, Texas, Union Pacific Railroad K Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20423± milepost 145.9 and milepost 149.0, Company, Southern Pacific 0001. In addition, a copy of each together with the ``loop'' trackage off of Transportation Company, The Texas pleading must be served on Eric M. the main line, all in the terminal area of Mexican Railway Company and The Hocky, Esq., Gollatz, Griffin & Ewing, Corpus Christi, TX, a distance of Burlington Northern and Santa Fe P.C., 213 West Miner Street, West approximately 3.1 miles. Railway Company, wherein CCPN seeks Chester, PA 19381±0796. The transaction was expected to be to acquire and operate certain rail lines Decided: August 5, 1997. from Port of Corpus Christi Authority of consummated on or after August 1, By the Board, David M. Konschnik, 1997. Nueces County, Texas. Director, Office of Proceedings. GWI directly controls one existing This transaction is related to STB Vernon A. Williams, Finance Docket No. 33437, Genesee & Class II rail carrier subsidiary: Buffalo & Secretary, Wyoming Inc.ÐContinuance in Control Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc., operating in ExemptionÐCorpus Christi Terminal New York and Pennsylvania. GWI [FR Doc. 97±21548 Filed 8±13±97; 8:45 am] Railroad, Inc., wherein the Genesee & directly controls 11 existing Class III rail BILLING CODE 4915±00±P Wyoming Inc. has concurrently filed a carrier subsidiaries: Genesee & verified notice to continue in control of Wyoming Railroad Company, Inc., DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CCPN, upon its becoming a Class III rail operating in western New York; Dansville and Mount Morris Railroad carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • RIC 6004 Supplement 30
    SUPPLEMENT TO FT RIC 6004 SUPPLEMENT 30 TO FREIGHT TARIFF RIC 6004 (Supplement 30 cancels Supplement 29) (Supplement 30 contains all changes) NAMING GENERAL CAR DEMURRAGE RULES AND CHARGES As provided in Section 1 herein STORAGE RULES AND CHARGES As provided in Section 2 herein SPECIAL CAR DEMURRAGE RULES AND CHARGES As provided in Section 3 herein CAR DEMURRAGE RULES AND CHARGES ON COAL AND COAL PRODUCTS As provided in Section 4 herein APPLYING AT ALL POINTS ON CARRIERS SHOWN AS PARTICIPANTS HEREIN (Except as otherwise provided) This tariff is also applicable on intrastate traffic, except where expressly provided to the contrary in connection with particular items. ISSUED: February 1, 2016 EFFECTIVE: March 1, 2016 ISSUED BY RAILINC, AGENT 7001 WESTON PARKWAY, SUITE 200 CARY, NC 27513 Copyright 2008 © RAILINC SUPPLEMENT 30 TO FT RIC 6004 ITEM 2.10 [PA] ITEM 2.10 [PA] LIST OF PARTICIPATING CARRIERS LIST OF PARTICIPATING CARRIERS ALPHABETIZED BY STANDARD CARRIER ALPHABETIZED BY STANDARD CARRIER ABBREVIATION ABBREVIATION (See Note, this item) (See Note, this item) CARRIER CARRIER NAME ITEMS CARRIER CARRIER NAME ITEMS ABBR ABBR AKDN - Acadiana Railway Company ..……………..37, 38 PR - Palmetto Railways………………………2325 [A-3] AR - Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company..[D-10] PTR - Port Terminal Railroad of South Carolina [D-8] AUAR - Austin Area Terminal Railroad [D] BCLR - Bay Colony Railroad Corporation PUCC - Port Utilities Commission of Charleston, S.C, The...[D-8] BJRY - Burlington Junction Railway [D-13] PW - Providence and Worcester Railroad BRC - Belt Railway Company of Chicago, The [D] Company..385-A CBRW - Columbia Basin Railroad Company, Inc. [D] SCTR - South Central Tennessee Railroad Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • 1085 Old River Road BLOOMINGDALE, GEORGIA 31302
    1085 Old River Road BLOOMINGDALE, GEORGIA 31302 PROPERTY DETAILS Size > ±40.75 Acres (Total) ±26.94 Upland Acres Use > Manufacturing and Commercial GEORGIA CENTRAL RAILWAY Jurisdiction > Bloomingdale, GA County > Effingham County, GA A HIGHLIGHTS ± 10 AC OLD RIVER ROAD • Two parcels of land totaling ±40.75 AC • Located 19.3 miles from the Port of Savannah B • ±1,828 feet of frontage along Old River Road ± 30.75 AC • Premier site for manufacturing and commercial uses • Direct access to I-16, 10.5 miles from I-95 • Georgia Central Railway - 1,435’ of potential railroad access FACTS & STATS 1.5 • Four-hour drive to Major Markets: Atlanta, Orlando and Charlotte MILES TO • Connector to two Class 1 Railroads with on-dock rail and line haul BAY ROAD services (CSX & Norfolk Southern) I-16 • Immediate Access to Two Major Interstates: I-16 (East/West) and I-95 (North/South) SEBASTIAN FINDLAY PRICING: Colliers International | Savannah Colliers International | Savannah FOR SALE > Please Inquire 545 E. York Street 912 483 6160 Savannah, GA 31401 [email protected] www.colliers.com/savannah 1085 Old River Road BLOOMINGDALE, GEORGIA 31302 ZONING ZONING I-1 - Light Industrial (10 Acres) - The purpose of this district shall be to create and protect areas for those industrial uses which do not create excessive noise, odors, smoke and dust I-1 and which do not possess other objectionable characteristics which might be detrimental to AR-1 surrounding neighborhoods or to the other uses permitted in this district. AR-1 - Agricultural Residential (30.75 Acres) - This district is established to allow agricultural GEORGIA CENTRAL RAILWAY areas to be developed in a manner consistent with the retention of agriculture and forestry and the preservation of rural character.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, December 22, 2020
    7.9 To the Honorable Council December 22, 2020 City of Norfolk, Virginia From: Robert Carteris Subject: Commonwealth Railway Director of Utilities Marshalling Yard Agreement Reviewed: Ward/Superward: N/A Wynter C. Benda, Chief Deputy City Manager Approved: Item Number: Dr. Larry H. Filer II, City Manager I. Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance II. Applicant: City of Norfolk Department of Utilities III. Description: This agenda item is an ordinance authorizing the City of Norfolk to enter into a sub- agreement with the Virginia Port Authority for relocation of municipal water lines in Suffolk, Virginia out of railroad property. IV. Analysis: The Virginia Port Authority received a grant from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation to expand rail service to the Virginia International Gateway Terminal in Portsmouth, Virginia. The area designated for the track expansion is encumbered by two water lines belonging to Norfolk and Portsmouth. This sub- agreement with the Virginia Port Authority allows them to use grant funding to reimburse Norfolk for 70% of the cost of the water main relocation. V. Financial Impact: The Department of Utilities will use existing authorizations to pay for the design and construction; 30% of the total project costs or approximately $5.8M will be funded by Norfolk. Packet Pg. 462 7.9 VI. Environmental: There may impacts to wetlands during construction; applicable permits and mitigations will be determined during the design process. VII. Community Outreach/Notification: Public notification for this agenda item was conducted through the City’s agenda notification process. VIII. Board/Commission Action: N/A IX. Coordination/Outreach: This letter and ordinance have been coordinated with the City Attorney’s Office.
    [Show full text]