Phenolic Compound Production and Biological Activities from in Vitro Regenerated Plants of Gherkin (Cucumis Anguria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phenolic Compound Production and Biological Activities from in Vitro Regenerated Plants of Gherkin (Cucumis Anguria EJBT-00103; No of Pages 7 Electronic Journal of Biotechnology xxx (2015) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 1 Phenolic compound production and biological activities from in vitro regenerated 2 plants of gherkin (Cucumis anguria L.) 3Q3 Muthu Thiruvengadam, Ill-Min Chung ⁎ 4 Department of Applied Bioscience, College of Life and Environmental Science, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea 5 article info abstract 6 Article history: Background: The effect of polyamines (PAs) along with cytokinins (TDZ and BAP) and auxin (IBA) was induced by 17 7 Received 8 January 2015 the multiple shoot regeneration from leaf explants of gherkin (Cucumis anguria L.). The polyphenolic content, 18 8 Accepted 2 May 2015 antioxidant and antibacterial potential were studied from in vitro regenerated and in vivo plants. 19 9 Available online xxxx Results: Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 3% sucrose containing a combination of 3.0 μM 20 TDZ, 1.0 μMIBAand75μM spermidine induced maximum number of shoots (45 shoots per explant) was 21 10 Keywords: achieved. Regenerated shoots elongated in shoot elongation medium containing 1.5 μMGA and 50 μM 22 11 Biological activities 3 μ 23 12 Cucumis anguria spermine. The well-developed shoots were transferred to root induction medium containing 1.0 M IBA and μ 24 13 Multiple shoot induction 50 M putrescine. Rooted plants were hardened and successfully established in soil with a 95% survival rate. 14 Plant growth regulators Twenty-five phenolic compounds were identified by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) 25 15 Polyamines analysis The individual polyphenolic compounds, total phenolic and flavonoid contents, antioxidant and 26 16 Polyphenolic content antibacterial potential were significantly higher with in vitro regenerated plants than in vivo plants. 27 Conclusions: Plant growth regulators (PGRs) and PAs had a significant effect on in vitro plant regeneration and 28 also a biochemical accumulation of flavonols, hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives in 29 C. anguria. Due to these metabolic variations, the antioxidant and antibacterial activities were increased with 30 in vitro regenerated plants than in vivo plants. This is the first report describing the production of phenolic 31 compounds and biological activities from in vitro and in vivo regenerated plants of C. anguria. 32 33 34 ©2015Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 353638 37 39 1. Introduction Anthraquinones and saponins that are present in C. anguria are 56 used for antibacterial and antifungal activity [3]. Plant secondary 57 40 Cucumis anguria L. commonly known as bur cucumber, bur gherkin, metabolites are unique sources for pharmaceuticals, food additives, 58 41 and West Indian gherkin is an important cucurbit vegetable and flavors, and industrially important biochemicals. Plant growth 59 42 conventional medicinal crop. It is mainly cultivated and used in Africa, regulators (PGRs) are one of the most important factors affecting 60 43 Brazil, Cuba, India, United States and Zimbabwe [1]. The fruits and cell growth, differentiation and metabolite formation [4].Thetype 61 44 leaves of gherkin are consumed as boiled, fried, stewed, pickled and and concentration of PGRs especially auxins and/or cytokinins have 62 45 also used as fresh in salads and hamburgers [2]. Additionally, the been shown to modify the shikimate/phenylpropanoid pathways in 63 46 fruits, roots and seeds of gherkins are used for traditional medicine to the biochemical synthesis of phenolic acids, probably by regulating 64 47 treat stomach ache, jaundice, hemorrhoids and preventing stone the enzyme activity of phenylalanine ammonia lyase and chalcone 65 48 formation in the kidney. Since there is a growing worldwide demand synthase [5]. The capacity for plant cell, tissue and organ cultures 66 49 for pickled gherkins, many food companies have started to explore to produce and accumulate many of the same valuable chemical 67 50 opportunities for producing gherkins [2]. Phytochemists have reported compounds as the parent plant in nature has been recognized since 68 51 a number of importantUNCORRECTED medicinal components of cucurbitacin B, the inception ofPROOFin vitro technology. Previously, many valuable 69 52 cucurbitacin D and cucurbitacin G from C. anguria; the cucurbitacin B compounds are produced by in vitro plant cell cultures [6,7,8]. 70 53 have been used for cancer prevention [2].Gherkinconsistsofmany Polyamines (PAs), a diamine putrescine, a triamine spermidine 71 54 useful compounds such as flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids, saponins and a tetraamine spermine, are ubiquitous in the animal and plant 72 55 and steroids that contained a high level of antioxidant activity. kingdom. PAs have been associated with many important cellular 73 processes such as cell division, protein synthesis, DNA replication, 74 response to abiotic stress, regulation of rhizogenesis, embryogenesis, 75 ⁎ Corresponding author. fl 76 E-mail address: [email protected] (I.-M. Chung). senescence, oral development and fruit ripening [9]. The exogenous Peer review under responsibility of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. application of PAs has shown a positive effect in the micropropagation 77 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.05.005 0717-3458/© 2015 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Please cite this article as: Thiruvengadam M, Chung I-M, Phenolic compound production and biological activities from in vitro regenerated plants of gherkin (Cucumis anguria L.), (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.05.005 2 M. Thiruvengadam, I.-M. Chung / Electronic Journal of Biotechnology xxx (2015) xxx–xxx 78 of several species such as Withania somnifera [10] and Glycine max 2.4. Transplantation and acclimatization 135 79 [11]. PAs have been successfully used in a variety of morphogenic 80 processes in horticultural crops [12]. Very few studies reported in Rooted plantlets were washed thoroughly with tap water to remove 136 81 cucurbits the effect of exogenous PAs have been enhanced for somatic agar and transplanted to plastic pots containing a mixture of autoclaved 137 82 embryogenesis in Momordica dioica [9], multiple shoot regeneration sand, red soil, and vermiculite (1:1:1 v/v/v). Potted plants were grown 138 83 from leaf explants of Momordica charantia [13] and shoot tip explants in a growth chamber (Sanyo, Tokyo, Japan) at 85% relative humidity 139 84 of Cucumis sativus [14].Anefficient plant regeneration protocol is a for 2–3 weeks, and then moved to a greenhouse for 3 weeks before 140 85 prerequisite for biotechnological breeding of economically important transferring to the field. The survival percentage was calculated after 141 86 crops like cucurbits. Recently, we established the plant regeneration 4 weeks in the greenhouse. After, 4 weeks of acclimatization, plants 142 87 from petiole derived callus [15], and direct somatic embryogenesis were transplanted to field. 143 88 from hypocotyl and leaf explants of gherkin [2]. However, there is no 89 report describing the effect of PGRs and PAs on in vitro regeneration 2.5. Sample preparation 144 90 in gherkin. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate 91 the synergistic effect of PAs (spermidine, spermine, and putrescine) Nine-week-old leaf derived from in vitro regenerated plants and 145 92 with different PGRs for high-frequency multiple shoot regeneration in vivo-grown seed-derived from plants (one-month-old) of C. anguria 146 93 systematically, via direct organogenesis using leaf explants. In were oven dried at 50°C to constant weight. The dried fine powder 147 94 addition, the variations of total polyphenolic content, individual samples (0.1 g) were extracted with 10 mL 80% methanol in a 148 95 polyphenols, antioxidant and antibacterial activities on in vitro and sonication bath for 30 min. The methanolic extracts were then filtered 149 96 in vivo regenerated plants of C. anguria. under vacuum through Whatman No. 1 filter paper, and the filtrates 150 were dried under vacuum using Rotary evaporator of crude extract. 151Q6 The extracts obtained were dissolved in the methanol immediately 152 97 2. Materials and methods used for the determination of total phenolics, flavonoids, antioxidant 153 and antibacterial activity. 154 98 2.1. Plant material 2.6. Determination of total phenolic (TPC) and flavonoid (TFC) contents 155 99 Seeds of gherkin (C. anguria L.) were obtained from Nunhems Seeds 100 Pvt. Ltd. (Bangalore, India). Seeds were surface sterilized following our The TPC and TFC contents of the samples were analyzed by following 156 101 previous reports [2], and were inoculated with the hormone free MS our previous procedure [18]. The concentration of the TPC and TFC was 157 102 [16] basal salt mixture + B5 vitamins [17] (MSB5) supplemented with determined as mg of gallic acid and quercetin equivalent respectively. 158 103 0.8% (w/v) agar and 3% (w/v) sucrose. The seedlings were grown 104 fl μ -2 -1 under white uorescent light (40 moL·m ·s ) at a photoperiod of 2.7. Extraction of phenolic compounds and analysis by ultra-performance 159 105 16/8 h of light/dark and temperature 25 ± 2°C. The leaf explants were liquid chromatography (UPLC) 160 106 trimmed into appropriate sizes (0.5 cm2) to obtain 10 d old in vitro 107 seedlings. One gram of dried plant powder was extracted as described in the 161 procedure [8].Thefiltrate was used for analysis using a Thermo Accela 162 163 108 2.2. Multiple shoot induction UPLC (Thermo, New York, USA) system. The separation was achieved using a HALO C18 (2.7 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm) column and the absorbance 164 was measured at 280 nm. The mobile phases were 0.1% glacial acetic 165 109Q4 The shoot bud initiation media which consisted of MSB5 166 110 medium with 3% (w/v) sucrose and solidified with 0.8% (w/v) acid in distilled water (solvent A) and 0.1% glacial acetic acid in 167 111 agar supplemented with different concentrations (1.0–4.0 μM) of acetonitrile (solvent B).
Recommended publications
  • Origin of Plant Originated from Some Had Possibly Changed Recognise Original Wild Species. Suggested a Relationship with Pr
    The possible origin of Cucumis anguria L. by A.D.J. Meeuse (National Herbarium, Pretoria) (Issued Oct. 2nd, 1958) Cucumis India Gherkin” “Bur anguria L., the “West or Gherkin”, is a cultigen known to have occurred in the West Indies in a cultivated or more or less adventitious state since before 1650 when the first accounts of this plant were published (1, 2). The occurrence of a single species of this old world genus — which is mainly African but extends through South West Asia to India — in America, combined with the fact that it is almost exclusively found in cultivation or as an escape, makes one feel suspicious about its being truly indigenous in the New World. Naudin (4) discussed the history of this plant and suggested that it introduced from West Africa whence slaves were was originally negro brought to the New World. However, he admittedly did not know any wild African species of Cucumis which resembles C. anguria sufficiently to deserve consideration as its probable ancestor. J. D. Hooker (5) also discussed the origin of the West Indian plant and was inclined to agree that it originated from some wild African ancestral form which had possibly changed so much through cultivation that it would be somewhat difficult to recognise the original wild species. He suggested a relationship with Cucumis prophetarum and “C. figarei” but he cautiously stated that these two species are perennial, whereas C. anguria is a typical annual. A. de Candolle (6) pointed out that although C. anguria was generally assumed to be a native of the Antilles, more particularly of Jamaica, two facts plead against this idea.
    [Show full text]
  • By W. G. D'arcy Issued by the SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN No. 139 THE ISLAND OF ANEGADA AND ITS k'LORA by W. G. D'Arcy Issued by THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Washington, D. C., U. S. A. February 16, 1971 THE ISLAND OF ANEGADA AND ITS nORA The island of Anegada in the British Virgin Islands is of interest because of its isolated location in relation to the Antillean island arc, its unusual topography amongst the Virgin Islands, and also the fact that it has received very little scientific attention. It now seems destined to join the list of islands which have succumbed to modern "development". This checklist combines past published reports with the writer's own collections and attempts to correct the nomenclature formerly applied to this flora. THE ISLAND Anegada is the northeasternmost of the British Virgin Islands and of the entire West Indian arc for that matter, vying with the rocky lighthouse, Sombrero, well to the southeast, as the closest Antillean approach to Europe. Its geographic coordinates are 18'45'N and 64°20'W, and it encompasses 14.987 square miles (Klumb and Robbins 1960) or about 33 square km. In shape it is a rather lumpy crescent with its long axis running approximately west by north and east by south. The nearest land, Virgin Gorda, some thirteen miles (ca 22 km) to the south and slightly west, is a prominent feature on the horizon (Fig. I), as is the mass of the other Virgins--Tortola, Camanoe and Jost Van Dyke-- further to the southwest. To the north and east there is no land for a long way.
    [Show full text]
  • Cucumis Anguria Var. Anguria Click on Images to Enlarge
    Species information Abo ut Reso urces Hom e A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Cucumis anguria var. anguria Click on images to enlarge Family Cucurbitaceae Scientific Name Cucumis anguria L. var. anguria Flower and leaves. Copyright CSIRO Meeuse, A.D.J. (1958) Blumea Supplementary Series 4: 200. Common name West Indian Gherkin Weed * Fruit. Copyright K.R. McDonald Stem A slender trailing or climbing annual herb, all parts densely hispid; stems ribbed, to 3 m long x 4 mm diameter. Tendrils simple, clothed in hispid hairs; tendrils leaf-opposed. Leaves Leaf blades broadly ovate, cordate at base, deeply 3-5 lobed; blades about 35-95 x 40-90 mm, petioles about 15-60 mm long; both upper and lower leaf surfaces and the petioles densely clohted in hispid hairs. Flowers Inflorescences unisexual. Male flowers: solitary or borne in fascicles of 2-10 flowers, or in pedunculate Habit, leaves and fruit. Copyright K.R. McDonald groups; flowers about 8 mm diam; calyx tube (hypanthium) about 3-3.5 mm long, lobes linear about 0.5-2 mm long; corolla lobes ovate about 3.8-6 mm long, yellow; stamens 3, two stamens with 2-locular anthers and one stamen with a unilocular anther. Female flowers: solitary; pedicels 10-95 mm; ovary 7-9 mm long, bristly. Fruit Fruit ellipsoidal, 35-60 x 20-28 mm, densely and shortly prickly or warted, green with paler bands, ripening yellow; seeds 4-6 mm long.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization of Conditions for Callus Induction and Indirect Organogenesis of Cucumis Anguria L
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 2015, 5(11):53-61 ISSN : 2249-7412 CODEN (USA): AJPSKY Optimization of conditions for callus induction and indirect organogenesis of Cucumis anguria L. 1J. Jerome Jeyakumar * and 2L. Vivekanandan 1Department of Biotechnology, Pavendar Bharathidasan College of Arts & Science, Mathur, Pudukottai Road, Tiruchchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India 2Plant Physiology and Biotechnology Division, UPASI TRF, Tea Research Institute, Nirar Dam P.O., Valparai, Tamil Nadu, India _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT An efficient procedure has been developed for callus induction and indirect organogenesis of Cucumis anguria L. Seedlings were grown under in vitro conditions and selection was carried out between the leaf and nodal segments for the explants in the seedlings. Different parameters like the explant source, hormones and sugars were checked for the optimization of cultures. Leaf explants which showed the maximum response to callus induction (42.0%) was thus, selected for the study. MS medium supplemented with 4.0 mg L -1 2,4-D and 4.0 mg L -1 NAA proved to be the most efficient hormone in promoting callus development from the leaf explants with 42.0% response and was the most favorable medium. Apart from the type of explant and growth regulators, different sugars and their concentrations were also checked for the induction of callus. 3% glucose produced highest rate of callus in the culture. In response to MS medium with 3.0 mg L -1 BAP and 0.5 mg L -1 Kn, best response of shoot induction was evoked with an average number of 5.02±0.76 shoots per callus.
    [Show full text]
  • Cucurbit Seed Production
    CUCURBIT SEED PRODUCTION An organic seed production manual for seed growers in the Mid-Atlantic and Southern U.S. Copyright © 2005 by Jeffrey H. McCormack, Ph.D. Some rights reserved. See page 36 for distribution and licensing information. For updates and additional resources, visit www.savingourseeds.org For comments or suggestions contact: [email protected] For distribution information please contact: Cricket Rakita Jeff McCormack Carolina Farm Stewardship Association or Garden Medicinals and Culinaries www.carolinafarmstewards.org www.gardenmedicinals.com www.savingourseed.org www.savingourseeds.org P.O. Box 448, Pittsboro, NC 27312 P.O. Box 320, Earlysville, VA 22936 (919) 542-2402 (434) 964-9113 Funding for this project was provided by USDA-CREES (Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service) through Southern SARE (Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education). Copyright © 2005 by Jeff McCormack 1 Version 1.4 November 2, 2005 Cucurbit Seed Production TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope of this manual .............................................................................................. 2 Botanical classification of cucurbits .................................................................... 3 Squash ......................................................................................................................... 4 Cucumber ................................................................................................................... 15 Melon (Muskmelon) .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Phenolic Compound Production and Biological Activities from in Vitro Regenerated Plants of Gherkin ( Cucumis Anguria
    Electronic Journal of Biotechnology E-ISSN: 0717-3458 [email protected] Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Chile Thiruvengadam, Muthu; Chung, Ill-Min Phenolic compound production and biological activities from in vitro regenerated plants of gherkin ( Cucumis anguria L.) Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 18, núm. 4, 2015, pp. 295-301 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Valparaíso, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=173341112006 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 18 (2015) 295–301 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Electronic Journal of Biotechnology Phenolic compound production and biological activities from in vitro regenerated plants of gherkin (Cucumis anguria L.) Muthu Thiruvengadam, Ill-Min Chung ⁎ Department of Applied Bioscience, College of Life and Environmental Science, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea article info abstract Article history: Background: The effect of polyamines (PAs) along with cytokinins (TDZ and BAP) and auxin (IBA) was induced by Received 8 January 2015 the multiple shoot regeneration from leaf explants of gherkin (Cucumis anguria L.). The polyphenolic content, Accepted 2 May 2015 antioxidant and antibacterial potential were studied from in vitro regenerated and in vivo plants. Available online 30 May 2015 Results: Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 3% sucrose containing a combination of 3.0 μM TDZ, 1.0 μMIBAand75μM spermidine induced maximum number of shoots (45 shoots per explant) was Keywords: achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico
    THE JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO Issued quarterly by the Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of Puerto Rico, for the publi­ cation of articles by members of its personnel, or others, dealing with any of the more technical aspects of scientific agriculture in Puerto Rico or the Caribbean Area. Vol. XLVII July 1963 No. 3 A Strain of Squash-Mosaic Virus and other Cucurbit Viruses Found in Puerto Rico, During 1958-62 J. Enrique Pérez1 INTRODUCTION Cucurbit viruses reported from Puerto Rico so far include virus "A" and virus "B", described and characterized by Adsuar and Cruz Miret (l)2. These authors found virus "B" to be a strain of cucumber virus 1 by cross- protection tests with Price's No. 6 strain in zinnia (2) and host-range studies. They found that virus "A" infected only cucurbitaceous hosts and that it had similar dilution and inactivation end-points as virus "B". Since that time no additional reports have been made on new virus diseases of cucurbits in Puerto Rico. Occasional reports have been made on appearance of viruslike symptoms on cucurbits, but no detailed studies of these condi­ tions have been made. In May 1958, observations made in an experimental plantation of musk- melon Cucumis meló L. var. Smith Perfect at the Solis farm led to a pre­ liminary diagnosis of virus disease. The leaves of a large number of plants were mottled showing blisterlike areas of dark-green color and deformation of the younger leaves. Many plants were seen to be stunted (8).
    [Show full text]
  • National Exotic Fruit Fly Detection Trapping Guidelines Some Processes, Equipment, and Materials Described in This Manual May Be Patented
    National Exotic Fruit Fly Detection Trapping Guidelines Some processes, equipment, and materials described in this manual may be patented. Inclusion in this manual does not constitute permission for use from the patent owner. The use of any patented invention in the performance of the processes described in this manual is solely the responsibility of the user. APHIS does not indemnify the user against liability for patent infringement and will not be liable to the user or to any third party for patent infringement. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of any individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. When using pesticides, read and follow all label instructions. First Edition Issued 2015 Contents Exotic Fruit
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Toxic to Horses
    Plants Toxic to Horses Adam-and-Eve (Arum, Lord-and-Ladies, Wake Robin, Starch Root, Bobbins, Cuckoo Plant) | Scientific Names: Arum maculatum | Family: Araceae African Wonder Tree () | Scientific Names: Ricinus communis | Family: Alocasia (Elephant's Ear) | Scientific Names: Alocasia spp. | Family: Araceae Aloe () | Scientific Names: Aloe vera | Family: Liliaceae Alsike Clover () | Scientific Names: Trifolium hybridum | Family: Leguminosae Amaryllis (Many, including: Belladonna lily, Saint Joseph lily, Cape Belladonna, Naked Lady) | Scientific Names: Amaryllis spp. | Family:Amaryllidaceae Ambrosia Mexicana (Jerusalem Oak, Feather Geranium) | Scientific Names: Chenopodium botrys | Family: Chenopodiaceae American Bittersweet (Bittersweet, Waxwork, Shrubby Bittersweet, False Bittersweet, Climbing Bittersweet) | Scientific Names: Celastrus scandens| Family: Celastraceae American Holly (English Holly, European Holly, Oregon Holly, Inkberry, Winterberry) | Scientific Names: Ilex opaca | Family: Aquifoliaceae American Mandrake (Mayapple, Indian Apple Root, Umbrella Leaf, Wild Lemon, Hog Apple, Duck's Foot, Raccoonberry) | Scientific Names:Podophyllum peltatum | Family: Berberidaceae American Yew (Canada Yew, Canadian Yew) | Scientific Names: Taxus canadensus | Family: Taxaceae Andromeda Japonica (Pieris, Lily-of-the-Valley Bush) | Scientific Names: Pieris japonica | Family: Ericaceae Angelica Tree (Hercules' Club, Devil's Walking Stick, Prickly Ash, Prickly Elder) | Scientific Names: Aralia spinosa | Family: Araliaceae Apple (Includes crabapples)
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Manual Some Processes, Equipment, and Materials Described in This Manual May Be Patented
    Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Manual Some processes, equipment, and materials described in this manual may be patented. Inclusion in this manual does not constitute permission for use from the patent owner. The use of any patented invention in the performance of the processes described in this manual is solely the responsibility of the user. APHIS does not indemnify the user against liability for patent infringement and will not be liable to the user or to any third party for patent infringement. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of any individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communciation of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. When using pesticies, read and follow all label instructions. Second Edition Issued 2012 Contents Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Manual
    [Show full text]
  • Anguilla Invasive Species Strategy 2008
    Giant African snail Corn snake Burr grass Cuban Tree frog Black rat Acacia Prepared by Rhon A. Connor (2008) Co-ordinator, Environment and Sustainable development Department of Environment Anguilla, WI Anguilla Invasive Species strategy (2008) draft 1 Important Note Please note that this document is an attempt at creating an Invasive Species Strategy for Anguilla. It is hope that this document will be constructively assessed, and that it will set the framework for a National Invasive Species strategy and policy for the island of Anguilla. * The document was drafted / patterned based on the Palau and Bahamas Invasive species Strategy; Table of Content 1.0 Introduction: An Overview of Invasive Species 2.0 Pathways of Entry 3.0 Potential Impact of Invasive Species 4.0 Mechanisms to Manage and Control Invasive Species 1: Prevention 2: Early Detection and Rapid Response 3. Control and Management 4. Rehabilitation and Restoration 5.0 Recommendations on Invasive Species 1. Ports of Entry 2. New invasive species 3. Management of established Invasive Species 4. Involvement of the Community 5. Invasive species Committee 6. Assessment of the Marine Environment 6.0 Glossary of Terms 7.0 Appendices 8.0 References Anguilla Invasive Species strategy (2008) draft 2 Appendices I. The Public and Implementation of the Strategy II. Plant and Animal Species Recommended for Eradication III. Plant and Animal Species Recommended for Control IV. Draft Policy on Invasive Species V. Code of Conduct for Government VI. Voluntary Code of Conduct for Botanical Gardens VII. Voluntary Code of Conduct for Landscape Architects VIII. Voluntary Code of Conduct for the Gardening Public IX.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Garden History Plant Lists
    Southern Plant Lists Southern Garden History Society A Joint Project With The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation September 2000 1 INTRODUCTION Plants are the major component of any garden, and it is paramount to understanding the history of gardens and gardening to know the history of plants. For those interested in the garden history of the American south, the provenance of plants in our gardens is a continuing challenge. A number of years ago the Southern Garden History Society set out to create a ‘southern plant list’ featuring the dates of introduction of plants into horticulture in the South. This proved to be a daunting task, as the date of introduction of a plant into gardens along the eastern seaboard of the Middle Atlantic States was different than the date of introduction along the Gulf Coast, or the Southern Highlands. To complicate maters, a plant native to the Mississippi River valley might be brought in to a New Orleans gardens many years before it found its way into a Virginia garden. A more logical project seemed to be to assemble a broad array plant lists, with lists from each geographic region and across the spectrum of time. The project’s purpose is to bring together in one place a base of information, a data base, if you will, that will allow those interested in old gardens to determine the plants available and popular in the different regions at certain times. This manual is the fruition of a joint undertaking between the Southern Garden History Society and the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. In choosing lists to be included, I have been rather ruthless in expecting that the lists be specific to a place and a time.
    [Show full text]