Budget Overview
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Beating the Pull of Bright Lights, Big City
NUMBER 2 • 19 JULY 2010 MJACareers THE MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA Beating the pull of bright lights, big city MONEY can buy a lot of things but it “bundling” incentives was likely can’t always buy long-term commitment. to yield better results. Despite programs to tempt doctors to Co-author of the report, C1 take up posts in far-fl ung locations, the Professor John Humphreys, lure of big dollars to work in remote from the School of Rural Health rural practices is often not suffi cient to at Monash University, says it is retain health care workers once they important for health services to have fulfi lled the initial terms of their help strike a balance for doctors, appointment. allowing them to be productive Indeed, there are lessons to be learnt and happy. Better work–life from other industries, such as mining, balance had become a mantra to entice doctors and other health for all. workers to stay on. Improving day-to- “Because doctors are intelligent day living comfort and job satisfaction by people, they look for packages Professor Humphreys also says it is maintaining access to professional support, that meet their greater needs. Retention often not the most remote communities offering city visits and access to childcare grants are a starting point. But there need that have the biggest trouble retaining and air-conditioned housing can be as to be options beyond those,” he says. doctors, but country towns that are in important as a substantial pay packet. The report, a project of the Australian overall decline, with empty shopfronts So say the authors of the report, Retention Primary Health Care Research Institute, and an air of despair about them. -
FFA-Cup-2019 Competition-Guide
1 FFA Cup 2019 Competition Guide CONTENTS Page Information, fixtures, results 2 Clubs 5 History and records 25 FFA CUP Web: www.theffacup.com.au Facebook: facebook.com/ffacup Twitter: @FFACup The FFA Cup is a national knockout competition run by Football Federation Australia (FFA) in conjunction with the State and Territory Member Federations. A total of 737 clubs entered the FFA Cup 2019, a number that has significantly grown from the first edition of the FFA Cup in 2014, when 617 clubs entered. The FFA Cup 2019 started in February with the Preliminary Rounds to determine the 21 clubs from the semi-professional and amateur tiers. These clubs joined ten of the Hyundai A-League clubs (Western United FC will not participate in this edition) and the reigning National Premier Leagues Champions (Campbelltown City SC) in the Final Rounds. The FFA Cup Final 2019 will be played on Wednesday 23 October with the host city to be determined by a live draw. Each cup tie must be decided on the day, with extra time to decide results of matches drawn after 90 minutes, followed by penalties if required. At least one Member Federation club is guaranteed to progress to the Semi Finals. Previous winners of the FFA Cup are Adelaide United (2014 and 2018), Melbourne Victory (2015), Melbourne City FC (2016) and Sydney FC (2017). Broadcast partners – FOX SPORTS FOX SPORTS will again provide comprehensive coverage of the FFA Cup 2019 Final Rounds. The FFA Cup’s official broadcaster will show one LIVE match per match night from the Round of 32 onwards, while providing coverage and updates, as well as live streams, of non-broadcast matches. -
Human Rights Law Centre-5.Pdf
1 Shahleena Musk Senior Policy Advocate Human Rights Law Centre Ltd Level 17, 461 Bourke Street Melbourne VIC 3000 T: + 61 3 8636 4460 E: [email protected] W: www.hrlc.org.au The Human Rights Law Centre protects and promotes human rights in Australia and beyond through a strategic mix of legal action, advocacy, research, education and UN engagement. It is an independent and not-for-profit organisation and donations are tax-deductible. Follow us at http://twitter.com/rightsagenda Join us at www.facebook.com/HumanRightsLawCentreHRLC/ The Human Rights Law Centre has made two previous submissions to the Royal Commission – the first submission on 28 October 2016 and the second, a joint submission with Aboriginal Peak Organisations NT and Danila Dilba Health Service, on 4 November 2016. This third submission has been prepared by Shahleena Musk, Senior Policy Advocate at the Human Rights Law Centre. It draws from extensive research and Shahleena’s significant experience as a senior youth justice lawyer with the North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency in Darwin. 2 The Northern Territory (NT) youth justice system has been ineffective in its response to children who commit crimes and fails to make communities safer. In particular, it fails those most vulnerable, compounding the disadvantage and trauma of those held in youth detention. The current system is contributing to increasing numbers of children coming into contact with the youth justice system. Inappropriate and ineffective laws and policies, including an overreliance on a punitive detention system, contributes to some of our most vulnerable and disadvantaged children becoming enmeshed in this system. -
NRETAS Annual Report 2011-12 Performance Reporting
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT, THE ARTS AND SPORT Performance Reporting Performance Reporting Protected Areas and Conservation Parks Joint Management Programs Output Group: Protected Areas and Output: Parks Joint Management Programs Conservation Parks Joint Management Programs establishes equitable joint Protected areas in the Territory are made up of many land holding and management partnerships with local Traditional Owners to manage, management agreements. National Parks and Reserves declared under maintain and protect the biodiversity of Parks and Reserves. the Territory Parks and Wildlife Act, serve a conservation and public enjoyment outcome. Indigenous Protected Areas are Indigenous-owned Performance Measures: Parks Joint Management Programs land or sea where Traditional Owners have entered into agreements with Key Deliverables 08–09 09–10 10–11 11–12 11–12 12–13 the Australian Government to promote biodiversity and conservation. Actual Actual Actual Estimate Actual Budget Private landholders who have signed agreements or covenants for their Operational Joint 7 7 8 14 152 233 Management Plans1 land also contribute to the make-up of protected areas in the Territory. Active joint management 5 8 10 15 115 186 The outcomes of this Output Group are protection of the natural and committees4 cultural assets in the Territory’s parks estate and creation of educational and recreational opportunities based on these assets with increased Explanatory Notes to the Table community involvement in protected areas management and wildlife 1. Joint Management Plans are statutory documents prepared under conservation across the Territory. the Territory Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act. They set out the This Output Group is attributed $58.3 million of the Department’s directions of management and governance for the Park under joint $192.4 million budget. -
Dear AHRC This Is a Brief Submission by the Criminal Lawyers Association of the Northern Territory
From: Russell Goldflam <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 21 July 2017 5:38 PM To: Humanrights Commissioner Subject: OPCAT Consultations Attachments: F.pdf; D.pdf; E.pdf Dear AHRC This is a brief submission by the Criminal Lawyers Association of the Northern Territory (CLANT) in response to the AHRC OPCAT Consultation Paper. Regrettably, we only became aware of the Consultation process today, the deadline for submissions. Accordingly, CLANT is only in a position to make a brief general submission, and we are unable to address the seven specific questions in the Consultation Paper. CLANT has for several years publicly called for the ratification of OPCAT. Those activities are conveniently summarised in my Statement dated 24 November 2016 to the Royal Commission into the Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory, in which I said: [O]n 2 October 2014, on behalf of CLANT I was one of 11 signatories to a statement (annexed hereto and marked ‘D’) calling for, among other things, an Independent Custodial Inspector. On 2 June 2015, CLANT endorsed a statement issued by the Making Justice Work Coalition (annexed hereto and marked ‘E’) renewing that call. On 30 May 2016, I wrote on behalf of CLANT to the National Children’s Commissioner (annexed hereto and marked ‘F’) urging the immediate ratification of the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture (OPCAT), which would provide a mechanism for independent oversight of youth detention facilities in the Northern Territory. The associated Bill then before the Northern Territory was however allowed to lapse. … I welcome the indication that has been provided by the recently elected Northern Territory government that an Independent Custodial Inspectorate will be established. -
Berrimah Farm and Berrimah Prison Biting Insect Assessment
Berrimah Farm and Berrimah Prison Biting Insect Assessment Study undertaken on behalf of the Northern Territory Department of Planning and Infrastructure Medical Entomology Centre for Disease Control Department of Health and Families Northern Territory Government September 2009 Berrimah Farm and Berrimah Prison Biting Insect Assessment Study undertaken on behalf of the Northern Territory Department of Planning and Infrastructure Allan Warchot and Peter Whelan Medical Entomology Centre for Disease Control Department of Health and Families September 2009 Berrimah Farm and Prison final report.doc Page 2 Table of contents List of Figures 5 List of Tables 5 List of Appendices 5 1.0 Introduction 6 2.0 Aims 7 3.0 Methods 9 4.0 Results 10 4.1 Biting midges 10 4.1.1 Adult biting midge trapping 10 4.2 Mosquitoes 12 4.2.1 Adult mosquito trapping 12 4.2.2 Larval mosquito survey 18 October 2008 and 7 July 2009 14 4.2.3 Berrimah Farm drainage line to Hudson Creek. Survey 14th August 2009 20 th 4.2.4 Berrimah Prison Sewage Ponds survey 28 August 2009 20 4.2.5 Desktop assessment of potential mosquito breeding sites 22 5.0 Discussion 24 5.1 Biting midges 24 5.1.1 Species present 24 5.1.2 Culicoides ornatus breeding sites 24 5.1.3 Spatial abundance and dispersal 25 5.1.4 Seasonal abundance 26 5.1.5 Pest problems 27 5.1.6 Biting midge control 27 5.1.7 Biting midges and planning aspects 28 5.1.8 Biting midge avoidance and personal protection 28 5.2 Mosquitoes 29 5.2.1 Species present 29 5.2.2 Mosquito borne disease 33 5.2.3 Mosquito breeding and development aspects 35 5.2.4 Mosquito breeding site rectification 38 5.2.5 Mosquito monitoring and control 41 6.0 Conclusions 43 6.1 Biting midges 43 6.2 Mosquitoes 44 7.0 Recommendations 46 7.1 Biting midges 46 7.2 Mosquitoes 46 8.0 Acknowledgements 49 9.0 References (Cited and uncited) 50 Figures 56 Berrimah Farm and Prison final report.doc Page 3 Tables 57 th Appendix 1 – Berrimah Prison Sewage Ponds survey 28 August 2009 58 Appendix 2 – Biting midges or ‘sandflies’ in the Northern Territory. -
2009 Annual Report
Annual Report 2009 discovery for a healthy tomorrow The Menzies School of Health Research was established in 1985 as a body corporate of the Northern Territory (NT) Government under the Menzies School of Health Research Act 1985 (Menzies Act). This Act was amended in 2004 to formalise the relationship with Charles Darwin University (CDU). Menzies is now a school within CDU’s Institute of Advanced Studies. In the spirit of respect, the Menzies School of Health Research acknowledges the people and elders of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Nations, who are the Traditional Owners of the land and seas of Australia. For the purposes of this document, ‘Indigenous’ refers to Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Contents 3 Contents Who we are and what we do... 4 Where and how we work 5 Menzies Strategic Plan 6 Vision 7 Values 7 Goals 7 The Year at a Glance 8 Financial and Corporate Overview 12 A Message from the Chair 14 A Message from the Director 16 A Message from the Manager, Menzies Indigenous Development Unit 18 Child Health Division 21 Healing and Resilience Division 29 International Health Division 35 Preventable Chronic Diseases Division 41 Services, Systems and Society Division 47 Tropical and Emerging Infectious Diseases Division 53 Education and Training Division 59 Corporate and Research Administration Division 63 Supporters, Donors and Sponsors in 2009 68 Governance 70 Honorary Appointees 73 Research Funding 74 Publications 84 Collaborators 91 Who we are and what we do... 4 Who we are and what we do... Through scientific excellence, education and research the team at Working within our seven Divisions our expertise includes: Menzies is discovering ways to reduce the impact of disease and • Child Health – we are working to combat ear, lung and skin improve the health and well-being of people living in Australia infections that affect the healthy development of Indigenous and beyond. -
Seniors and Disability Services Directory Introduction
Seniors and Disability Services Directory Introduction Welcome to the 2015 edition of the City of Darwin’s ‘Seniors and Disability Services Directory’. The directory provides information on services available to people with a disability and people over the age of 50 living in the Darwin community. While considerable care has been taken to ensure that information contained in this Directory is correct at the time of printing, Council takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. The Directory can also be accessed and additional copies downloaded via City of Darwin’s website www.darwin.nt.gov.au Please advise Council’s Community and Cultural Services Department if any changes are necessary on telephone 08 8930 0409. For general enquiries regarding Council services, contact: Customer Service Centre City of Darwin Harry Chan Avenue Darwin NT 0800 GPO Box 84 Darwin NT 0801 Telephone 08 8930 0300 Facsimile 08 8930 0311 Email [email protected] Website www.darwin.nt.gov.au Published by Community & Cultural Services Department, City of Darwin Publication printed by Zip Print ISBN: 978-0-9578904-3-5 i Contents ACCOMMODATION .................................................................................. 1 ADVISORY/PEAK BODY .............................................................................. 3 ADVOCACY ................................................................................................ 9 AGED CARE SERVICES ............................................................................. 12 CHILDREN’S SERVICES ............................................................................. -
Northern Territory Safe Streets Audit
Northern Territory Safe Streets Audit Prepared by the Northern Institute at Charles Darwin University and the Australian Institute of Criminology Anthony Morgan Emma Williams Lauren Renshaw Johanna Funk Special report Northern Territory Safe Streets Audit Prepared by the Northern Institute at Charles Darwin University and the Australian Institute of Criminology Anthony Morgan Emma Williams Lauren Renshaw Johanna Funk Special report aic.gov.au © Australian Institute of Criminology 2014 ISBN 978 1 922009 72 2 (Print) 978 1 922009 73 9 (Online) Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Inquiries should be addressed to the publisher. Published by the Australian Institute of Criminology GPO Box 2944 Canberra ACT 2601 Tel: (02) 6260 9200 Fax: (02) 6260 9299 Email: [email protected] Website: aic.gov.au Please note: minor revisions are occasionally made to publications after release. The online versions available on the AIC website will always include any revisions. Disclaimer: This research report does not necessarily reflect the policy position of the Australian Government. Edited and typeset by the Australian Institute of Criminology A full list of publications in the AIC Reports series can be found on the Australian -
Greater Darwin Region Land Use Plan Towards 2030
Greater Darwin Region Land Use Plan Towards 2030 Consultation Paper Published by the Department of Lands and Planning © Northern Territory Government 2011. Apart from any use permitted under the Australian Copyright Act no part of this document may be reproduced without written permission from the Northern Territory Government through the Department of the Chief Minister. ISBN 978-1-921728-05-1 Enquiries should be made to: Department of Lands and Planning GPO Box 1680 Darwin NT 0801 www.growingnt.nt.gov.au Throughout this document the term Indigenous is used to refer to both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. NAME OF SECTION GREATER DARWIN REGION LAND USE PLAN Greater Darwin Region Land Use Plan Towards 2030 Consultation Paper CONSULTATION The Greater Darwin Region Land Use Plan – Towards 2030 Consultation Paper is placed on public exhibition to seek community input and support. Minister for Lands and Planning A message from the Hon Gerry McCarthy MLA The Greater Darwin Region is unlike anywhere else in the country, and the Territory Government is planning for its future with the Greater Darwin Region Land Use Plan – Towards 2030. The region’s economy and population are growing. Young Territorians are taking advantage of the job opportunities on offer and raising their families here, more people are moving from interstate to enjoy our lifestyle, and older Territorians are choosing to retire here. The economic future is bright, supported by Government’s record infrastructure program, and its commitment to securing major projects like INPEX, a Marine Supply Base and new mines. The Territory 2030 strategic plan sets a roadmap for the future, including targets for affordable housing and the community’s desire for new and sustainable urban design. -
[2004] NTSC 60 PARTIES: the QUEEN V LEACH, Martin TITLE of COURT
The Queen v Leach [2004] NTSC 60 PARTIES: THE QUEEN v LEACH, Martin TITLE OF COURT: SUPREME COURT OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY JURISDICTION: SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY EXERCISING TERRITORY JURISDICTION FILE NO: 8312499 DELIVERED: 12 November 2004 HEARING DATES: 26 & 27 July and 26 & 27 October 2004 JUDGMENT OF: MARTIN (BR) CJ CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW Sentencing – murder – rape – life imprisonment – Sentencing (Crime of Murder) Parole Reform Act 2003 – Part 5 Transitional Provisions – application by the Director of Public Prosecutions pursuant to s 19(5) – whether to refuse to fix a non-parole period – level of culpability. CRIMINAL LAW Evidence – matters relating to proof – future probabilities – likelihood of re-offending – whether determination of fact. STATUTES Act of Parliament – interpretation – Sentencing (Crime of Murder) Parole Reform Act 2003 – s 19(5) – whether community interest to be assessed at time of application. Sentencing (Crime of Murder) Parole Reform Act 2003, s 18 and s 19 Tepper v Kelly (1987) 45 SASR 340 at 343; Tepper v Kelly (1988) 47 SASR 271 at 273; R v Harris (2000) 50 NSWLR 409 at 419, R v Coulston [1997] 2 CR 446 p 463; The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; applied. Veen v The Queen [No 1] (1979) 143 CLR 458; Veen v The Queen [No 2] (1988) 164 CLR 465, p 473, 475; R v Sione Penisini [2003] NSWSC 892, para 82; R v Bell (1985) 2 NSWLR 466; Bugmy v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 525; considered. R v SLD [2003] NSWCCA 310; R v McNamara [2004] NSWCCA 42 at [25]; not followed [in part]. -
Joint Statement
JOINT STATEMENT Berrimah Prison is not good enough for Territory’s most vulnerable kids We call for urgent action from the Northern Territory Government to improve youth detention facilities and commission a purpose-built youth detention facility. We are extremely concerned that children and young people in the Northern Territory are being subjected to unsafe, developmentally inappropriate detention that contravenes National and International protocols. In August 2014, six youths allegedly involved in a ‘riot’ were subjected to tear gas, then removed from Darwin’s Don Dale Youth Detention Centre to the punishment unit of Darwin Correctional Centre (‘Berrimah’). The boys are aged between 14 and 16. Amnesty International called for an independent investigation into the incident and there have been indications that the Northern Territory’s Children’s Commissioner, Dr Howard Bath is investigating. Since that time, the Northern Territory Government announced that the Don Dale centre would be immediately closed and all youths in detention moved first to the Complex Behaviours Unit at the new Darwin Correctional Precinct, and when adult prisoners were moved to the new prison, to Berrimah Prison. On 13 and 14 September 2014, five youths allegedly damaged cells in the new Complex Behaviours Unit, with some also getting onto the roof of the facility. These youths were then transferred to the maximum security unit until the damaged areas were repaired. Berrimah Prison At a coronial inquest in 2011, the Commissioner of Northern Territory Correctional Services, Ken Middlebrook said that Berrimah prison was so run down that it should be bulldozed. 1 Amnesty International’s Rodney Dillon urged that Berrimah Prison not be used as a youth detention centre: “Berrimah’s not child-appropriate.